|
01-01 |
Risk Management Plan for Hazardous or Liquid Industrial Wastes with Environmental Compliance Approval
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste, at a facility other than a landfill or transfer station, is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste, at a facility other than a landfill or transfer station, is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required.
For existing facilities, the expansion or improvement of an existing hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste facility, or the establishment of a new storage facility, the Risk Management Plan shall include the following requirements: storage, which should include, but not be limited to: run-off containment measures, appropriate buffer zones from watercourses, water bodies or wells, if present and not located over existing piping or drainage, leak and spill prevention measures, secondary containment measures,
record keeping spills plan, which should include a pollution prevention assessment.
For properties where the person engaging in the activity has or intends to obtain, an Environmental Compliance Approval as per the Environmental Protection Act, the person engaging in the activity may be deemed to be exempt from the requirement for a Risk Management Plan if the process described in O.Reg. 287/07, s. 61, is followed.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
01-02 |
Risk Management Plan for Hazardous or Liquid Industrial Wastes without Environmental Compliance Approval
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste as defined in Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act, which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
Refer to the Tables of Drinking Water Threats and online Threats Tool for site specific features and chemicals.
The storage of waste as described may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan and is therefore designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required.
For existing facilities, the expansion or improvement of an existing facility, or the establishment of a new storage facility, the Risk Management Plan shall include the following requirements:
1. storage, which should include but not be limited to:
a) run-off containment measures,
b) appropriate buffer zones from watercourses, water bodies or wells, if present, and not located over existing piping or drainage,
c) leak and spill prevention measures,
d) secondary containment measures
2. record keeping
3. spills plan, which should include a pollution prevention assessment.
For properties where the person engaging in the activity has or intends to obtain, an Environmental Compliance Approval as per the Environmental Protection Act, the person engaging in the activity may be deemed to be exempt from the requirement for a Risk Management Plan if the process described in O.Reg. 287/07, s. 61, is followed.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
01-03 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the following waste disposal activities are significant drinking water threats (existing activity):
1. land disposal of petroleum refining waste within the meaning of clause (d) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General – Waste Management) R.R.O. 1990 made under the Environmental Protection Act
2. land disposal of hazardous waste, liquid industrial waste, or processed liquid industrial waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and (b) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347, R.R.O. 1990 (General – Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
3. land disposal of liquid industrial waste within the meaning of clause (c) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General – Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
4. land disposal of industrial waste or commercial waste within the meaning of clause (c) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
5. land disposal of municipal waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and (b) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General – Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
6. storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines
7. storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste
8. application of untreated septage to land
The policy applies to the following provincial instruments related to waste disposal activities as described in clauses (1) to (8) above:
A. approvals of waste disposal sites;
B. approvals of renewable energy facilities; and
C. approvals of sewage works
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall:
1. Review all existing approvals as described in clauses (A) to (C) above;
2. Determine whether the approvals as described in clauses (A) to (C) above contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the waste disposal activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, with particular consideration given to the monitoring, collection and treatment of leachate into groundwater and/or runoff into surface water; and
3. Where the Ministry is of the opinion that the terms, conditions and measures contained in an approval as described in clauses (A) to (C) above are not adequate, make such amendments to the approval so as to ensure that the waste disposal activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
Existing approvals shall be reviewed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. Where amendments are deemed necessary, the existing approval shall be amended within 12 months of the review, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities.
Monitoring policy MP-01 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
01-04 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the following waste disposal activities would be significant drinking water threats (future activity):
1. land disposal of petroleum refining waste within the meaning of clause (d) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General – Waste Management) R.R.O. 1990 made under the Environmental Protection Act
2. land disposal of hazardous waste, liquid industrial waste, or processed liquid industrial waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and (b) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347, R.R.O. 1990 (General – Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
3. land disposal of liquid industrial waste within the meaning of clause (c) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General – Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
4. land disposal of industrial waste or commercial waste within the meaning of clause (c) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
5. land disposal of municipal waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and (b) of the definition of "land disposal" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General – Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
6. storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines
7. storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste
8. application of untreated septage to land
The policy applies to the following approvals from the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change related to waste disposal activities as described in clauses (1) to (8) above :
A. approvals of waste disposal sites;
B. approvals of renewable energy facilities; and
C. approvals of sewage works
No new waste disposal sites as described in clauses (1) to (8) above shall be established (future activity).
For existing waste disposal sites, approval for an expansion or the renewal/updating of a previous approval may be given where:
i. the waste disposal site is one described by clauses (1) to (7) above; and
ii. the waste disposal site existed on the property as of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan; and
iii. the approval contains appropriate terms and conditions and requires adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the waste disposal activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
Monitoring policy MP-03 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
01-05 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act related to the storage of PCB waste at a PCB waste disposal site is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change should review all Director's instructions provided under O. Reg. 362 of the Environmental Protection Act within the affected vulnerable areas.
The Ministry should determine whether any PCBs stored on properties within the affected vulnerable areas can be moved to locations outside of the vulnerable areas so as to remove this significant drinking water threat. Where PCBs can be safely moved, the Ministry should require such movement to occur within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan, or such other date as the Director determines.
Where the Ministry is of the opinion that the movement of the stored PCBs is not a viable option, the Ministry should ensure adequate measures are in place so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity). The storage of additional PCBs at an existing site and the establishment of new PCB waste storage sites shall be prohibited in all vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
Existing approvals should be reviewed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities.
Monitoring policy MP-31 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
01-06 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the following waste disposal activities would be significant drinking water threats (future activity):
land disposal of petroleum refining waste within the meaning of clause (d) of the definition of ""land disposal"" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) R.R.O. 1990 made under the Environmental Protection Act
land disposal of hazardous waste, liquid industrial waste, or processed liquid industrial waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and (b) of the definition of ""land disposal"" in section 1 of Regulation 347, R.R.O. 1990 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
land disposal of liquid industrial waste within the meaning of clause (c) of the definition of ""land disposal"" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
land disposal of industrial waste or commercial waste within the meaning of clause (c) of the definition of ""land disposal"" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
land disposal of municipal waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and (b) of the definition of ""land disposal"" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act
The municipality shall prohibit, through the official plan and zoning by-law, the establishment of waste disposal sites as a land use under the circumstances listed in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats for a significant drinking water threat.
This policy applies to all land use designations and zones described in the municipality's official plan and zoning by-law, as amended from time to time.
The Municipality shall:
- Adopt the official plan, or official plan amendment as the case may be, and:
submit the plan to the appropriate approval authority; or
give a notice of adoption; and
- Adopt the zoning by-law, or zoning by-law amendment as the case may be, and give a notice of adoption.
For Section 40(2) of the Clean Water Act, the official plan and zoning by-law must be amended within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan or at the time of the next official plan and zoning by-law conformity exercise as per Section 26 of the Planning Act.
Furthermore, the municipality shall give due consideration to amending the official plan and zoning by-law so as to apply the prohibition on the establishment of waste disposal sites as listed in clauses (1) to (5) above to all WHPA-A and WHPA-B vulnerable areas.
Monitoring policy MP-21 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
01-07 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the land disposal of municipal waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and (b) of the definition of ""land disposal"" in section 1 of Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act , is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity).
Municipalities shall give due consideration to waste diversion measures that would:
reduce the total quantity of waste that must be disposed; and
reduce the toxicity of this waste.
Monitoring policy MP-19 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-01 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a septic system is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity).
Municipalities with a sewer line in a vulnerable area or within 100 metres of a vulnerable area shall enact a sewer connection by-law. The by-law shall:
- apply to all properties in vulnerable areas where:
the establishment, operation or maintenance of a septic system is a significant drinking water threat; and
a municipal sewer line is located on a right-of-way that abuts a property; and
the linear distance between the sewer line and the point from which plumbing exits a structure on the property is less than 100 metres; and
sufficient capacity exists in the municipal sewage system to handle the effluent from the property;
require connection to the municipal sewer line;
require decommissioning of the on-site sewage system at the time of connection to the municipal sewer line;
establish a deadline not later than five years after the effective date of the Source Protection Plan for the connection to be completed.
At the discretion of the municipality, the by-law may also contain an exemption for properties where the estimated cost of the sewer connection exceeds three times the estimated cost of an advanced septic system that is sized appropriately for the calculated daily design flow.
The process to enact the by-law shall be initiated within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan and the by-law enacted within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-11 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-02-QUINTE |
In areas where existing private onsite sewage systems are identified as significant drinking water threats, the municipality is required by the Ontario Building Code to implement a mandatory inspection program. The municipality shall:
1) Follow the ‘On-Site Sewage Maintenance Inspection’ document dated March, 2011 as amended from time to time, developed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, to ensure a consistent approach to inspecting onsite systems across the province; and
2) Prioritize the inspections based on location, age of septic systems and other factors which would result in identifying systems that may need to be improved.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) – Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed;
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) – Picton, Point Anne and Ameliasburgh; and
c) Issues Contributing Area – Madoc.
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26(1)(iv) of Ontario Regulation 287/07. Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List E)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect and in accordance with the Ontario Building Code. Note: The Ontario Building Code allows municipalities to start
inspections upon approval of an Assessment Report. Each septic system in these zones must be inspected every five years.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F): The municipality shall prepare a report for the previous calendar year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year summarizing:
a) The number of inspections conducted;
b) The number and location of septic systems identified as noncompliant using the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing On-Site Sewage Management Inspection protocol; and
c) A description of any identified deficiencies in the private sewage systems, and the compliance and enforcement action taken to achieve compliance. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-02-SGSNBP |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a septic system would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity).
The policy applies to approvals from the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change related to the establishment, operation or maintenance of an on-site sewage system as regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act.
It is recommended that the Ministry review all Environmental Compliance Approvals for on-site sewage systems to determine whether:
a) the system contains design standards that provide reductions in the level of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the treatment unit effluent;
b) the conditions include requirements for an emergency plan in the event of a failure of the system; and
c) the conditions include requirements for onsite monitoring to ensure that the system is functioning as designed and require the proponent to have the system inspected regularly using a standard equal to or greater than the inspection protocols of the “On-Site Sewage Maintenance Inspection” document dated March 2011 as amended from time to time, developed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-03 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a septic system would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The policy applies to approvals from the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change related to the establishment, operation or maintenance of an on-site sewage system as regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act.
A. Installation of an on-site sewage system is not permitted in locations where a municipal by-law made pursuant to Policy Text ID 02-01 applies.
B. Installation of a treatment unit and associated leaching bed system, or alternative, is permitted provided that the approval contains appropriate terms and conditions and requires adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the on-site sewage system never becomes a significant drinking water threat. It is recommended that:
a) the system contain design standards that provide reductions in the level of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in the treatment unit effluent;
b) the conditions include requirements for an emergency plan in the event of a failure of the system; and
c) the conditions include requirements for onsite monitoring to ensure that the system is functioning as designed and require the proponent to have the system inspected regularly using a standard equal to or greater than the inspection protocols of the “On-Site Sewage Maintenance Inspection” document dated March 2011 as amended from time to time, developed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
C. A class 5 on-site sewage system, i.e. a holding tank, may only be permitted in cases where:
a) the Ministry:
i. deems that an approval is necessary to address a temporary or otherwise unsafe situation; and
ii. provides an approval for a one-time period of use; and
iii. sets an approval period that does not exceed 12 months; or
b) the Ministry:
i. determines that other treatment options cannot be utilized because the footprint of the principal building does not allow adequate space for siting of other treatment options on the property; and
ii. ensures that the holding tank installation meets all applicable requirements; and
iii. ensures that the approval contains appropriate terms and conditions and requires adequate measures to be in place so that the holding tank never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
02-04 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a septic system is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
As per the Building Code (Ontario Regulation 332/12 under the Building Code Act), the local principal authority shall implement a mandatory on-site sewage maintenance inspection program within their areas of jurisdiction.
It is recommended that the inspection program:
follow inspection guidelines produced by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing; and
determine whether all greywater or blackwater drains that exit buildings on the property connect to an on-site sewage system; and
prioritize systems that are:
located closest to the municipal drinking water wellhead; or
lacking documentation of a prior license, permit or approval; or
more than 10 years old; or
all other remaining systems.
Where an on-site sewage system is found to be failing or in violation of the current Building Code provisions, the system shall be repaired or replaced so as to be compliant with current Building Code requirements.
Initially, inspections for any systems existing as of January 24, 2012 must be completed by January 24, 2017.
Monitoring policy MP-15 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-05 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a septic system would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
New lots created either through severance or subdivision under the Planning Act shall only be permitted by the planning approval authority where the lots will be serviced by a municipal sewage system or where an on-site septic system could be located outside of a vulnerable area with a vulnerability score of 10.
Monitoring policy MP-14 applies.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
02-06 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a septic system would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing shall give due consideration to making changes to the Ontario Building Code and other such legislation related to on-site sewage systems (future activity).
The legislative changes would include provisions that would:
- Set standards under the Ontario Building Code to define advanced systems, including, but not necessarily limited to, standards for Nitrate and Phosphorous levels in effluent; and
- Require that advanced septic systems be required for new installations in vulnerable areas where an on-site sewage system is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
For the purposes of determining which systems achieve Nitrogen and Phosphorous reduction, it is suggested that reference could be made to the CAN/BNQ 3680-600 standard ""Onsite Residential Wastewater Treatment Technologies ; as established by the Bureau de normalisation du Quebec (BNQ), or an equivalent standard.
Monitoring policy MP-09 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
02-07 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the following activities related to the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage are significant drinking water threats (existing activity):
1. industrial effluent discharge
2. sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water
3. storage of sewage (e.g. treatment plant tanks)
4. sewage treatment plant effluent discharge (including lagoons)
The policy applies to provincial instruments related to approvals to establish, alter, extend or replace existing sewage works as described in clauses (1) to (4) above.
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall:
A. Review all existing approvals as described above;
B. Determine whether the approvals contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the sewage works ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; and
C. Where the Ministry is of the opinion that the terms, conditions and measures contained in an approval are not adequate, make such amendments to the approval so as to ensure that the sewage works ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
Existing approvals shall be reviewed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. Where amendments are deemed necessary, the existing approval shall be amended within 12 months of the review, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities.
Monitoring policy MP-01 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-08 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the following activities related to the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage would be significant drinking water threats (future activity):
1. industrial effluent discharge
2. sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water
3. storage of sewage (e.g. treatment plant tanks)
4. sewage treatment plant effluent discharge (including lagoons)
The policy applies to approvals from the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change related to approvals to establish, alter, extend or replace new or existing sewage works as described in clauses (1) to (4) above.
No new sewage works as described in clauses (1) to (4) above shall be established (future activity).
Approval for an expansion of an existing sewage works or the renewal/updating of a previous approval for an existing sewage works may be given where:
i. the sewage works is one described by clauses (1) to (4) above; and
ii. the sewage works existed on the property as of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan; and
iii. the approval is either:
a. a renewal of a previous approval related to a site as described by clause (i) and (ii); or
b. a new approval related to a site as described by clause (i) and (ii); and
iv. the approval contains appropriate terms and conditions and requires adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the sewage works ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
Monitoring policy MP-03 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
02-09 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
Municipalities shall inspect and maintain municipal sanitary sewers and related pipes so as to uphold high standards of performance and minimize the risk of leakage.
Existing sewage lines shall be inspected within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan and at regular intervals thereafter.
Monitoring policy MP-19 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-10 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
Municipalities shall give due consideration to establishing or continuing a program that would:
a) collect information and document the location of sewage lines
b) document whether properties were serviced by municipal sewage lines or other sewage systems, such as septic systems
c) be in digital format and contain GPS coordinates
An initial review shall be completed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-19 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-11 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage is a significant drinking water threat, in particular the discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility (existing activity).
Municipalities shall give due consideration to evaluating existing stormwater management facilities in vulnerable areas. If found to be deficient, due consideration shall be given to implementing measures that would improve the functioning of the facilities with respect to water quality.
An initial review shall be completed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-19 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-12 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage is a significant drinking water threat, in particular:
combined sewer discharge to surface water (existing activity)
sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water (existing activity)
Municipalities shall give due consideration to establishing or continuing programs that separate combined sewers, as much as is feasible, to alleviate the amount of wastewater transported to the wastewater treatment plants.
An initial review shall be completed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-19 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-13 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage is or would be a significant drinking water threat, in particular:
- sanitary sewers and related pipes (existing activity or future activity)
- discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility (existing activity or future activity)
Municipalities shall give due consideration to establishing or continuing programs that reduce infiltration of waste water into groundwater aquifers that are used as drinking water sources.
An initial review shall be completed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-19 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
02-14 |
The policy applies in all wellhead protection area zones where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage would be a significant drinking water threat, in particular the discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility (future activity).
The municipality shall give due consideration to design standards for stormwater management facilities that would:
- minimize infiltration to groundwater from stormwater detention ponds, constructed wetlands, vegetated swales and other similar stormwater management components
- prohibit the use of infiltration trenches, infiltration galleries and other similar sub-surface components of the system that allow for the direct infiltration of the collected stormwater.
Monitoring policy MP-19 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
03-01 |
The policy applies in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the application of agricultural source material to land would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The application of agricultural source material shall be prohibited.
Therefore, the application of agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
03-02 |
The policy applies in:
all vulnerable areas where the application of agricultural source material to land is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity); and
all vulnerable areas, except WHPA-A, where the application of agricultural source material to land would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity)
The application of agricultural source material to land may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the application of agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The plan shall meet the guidelines with respect to the contents of a nutrient management plan established under Part III of O.Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act.
It is recommended that NMAN software or similar be utilized to assist in calculations.
The calculations shall be reviewed annually and the Risk Management Plan updated so that it accurately reflects the anticipated operation on the farm unit during the following year.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
For properties where the person engaging in the activity has or intends to obtain, a nutrient management plan approval as per the Nutrient Management Act, the person engaging in the activity may be deemed to be exempt from the requirement for a Risk Management Plan if the process described in O.Reg. 287/07, s. 61, is followed.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
04-01 |
The policy applies in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the storage of agricultural source material is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The expansion of an existing permanent nutrient storage facility, or the establishment of a new permanent nutrient storage facility, for agricultural source material shall be prohibited.
The expansion of an existing temporary field nutrient storage site, or the establishment of a new temporary field nutrient storage site, for agricultural source material shall be prohibited.
Therefore, the storage of agricultural source material is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
For clarity, the improvement of an existing permanent nutrient storage facility is allowed where it is determined that such improvements would provide additional measures to protect sources of drinking water.
Any material within temporary field nutrient storage sites existing as of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan shall be removed within 240 days of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
As of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan, no new material may be added to a temporary field nutrient storage site existing as of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
04-02 |
The policy applies in:
all vulnerable areas where the storage of agricultural source material in a permanent nutrient storage facility is a significant drinking water threat, except for the expansion of an existing permanent nutrient storage facility within WHPA-A (existing activity or future activity); and
all vulnerable areas where the storage of agricultural source material in a permanent nutrient storage facility would be a significant drinking water threat, except for the establishment of a new permanent nutrient storage facility within WHPA-A(future activity).
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. Agricultural source material may only be stored in a permanent nutrient storage facility in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the storage of agricultural source material in a permanent nutrient storage facility is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
The Risk Management Plan shall satisfy the following provisions:
The Risk Management Plan shall follow the guidelines with respect to the contents of a nutrient management strategy established under Part III of O.Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act. It is recommended that NMAN software or similar be utilized to assist in calculations. The calculations shall be reviewed annually and the Risk Management Plan updated so that it accurately reflects the anticipated operation on the farm unit during the following year.
The Risk Management Plan shall state:
the capacity of nutrient storage facilities on the property at the time of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan; and
the number of nutrient units that would normally be housed on the property at the time of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan
The Risk Management Plan shall not allow for the expansion of an existing permanent nutrient storage facility, or the establishment of a new permanent nutrient storage facility, for agricultural source material unless:
the expansion or new facility would provide the capacity necessary for a minimum of 240 days of storage for the number of nutrient units housed on the property; and
sufficient land base to accommodate the application of the stored agricultural source material is documented elsewhere in the Risk Management Plan; and
the expansion or new facility would be constructed to the following design standards, as a minimum:
for a liquid storage system, a synthetic liner, as defined by O. Reg. 267/03 s. 1; or
for a dry storage system, reinforced concrete floor and reinforced concrete walls; and
installation, material, engineering, setbacks and other such standards as specified under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002, and its regulations
It is strongly encouraged that consideration be given to having a capacity for 365 days of storage for the number of nutrient units housed on the property.
For clarity, the improvement of an existing permanent nutrient storage facility is allowed where it is determined that such improvements would provide additional measures to protect sources of drinking water.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
For properties where the person engaging in the activity has or intends to obtain, a nutrient management strategy approval as per the Nutrient Management Act, the person engaging in the activity may be deemed to be exempt from the requirement for a Risk Management Plan if the process described in O.Reg. 287/07, s. 61, is followed.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
04-03 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas, except WHPA-A, where the storage of agricultural source material in a temporary field nutrient storage site is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. Agricultural source material may only be stored in a temporary field nutrient storage site in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the storage of agricultural source material in a temporary field nutrient storage site is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
The Risk Management Plan shall satisfy the following provisions:
The Risk Management Plan shall follow the guidelines with respect to the contents of a nutrient management strategy established under Part III of O.Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act. It is recommended that NMAN software or similar be utilized to assist in calculations. The calculations shall be reviewed annually and the Risk Management Plan updated so that it accurately reflects the anticipated operation on the farm unit during the following year.
The Risk Management Plan shall not allow for the expansion of an existing temporary field nutrient storage site.
The Risk Management Plan shall not allow for the establishment of a new temporary field nutrient storage site for agricultural source material unless:
the temporary field site is identified in the Risk Management Plan; and
prior to the use of a site, a notice is obtained from the Risk Management Official that specifies the location of the site and limits the period of use to not more than 30 days, or a lesser time period if deemed appropriate; and
sufficient land base to accommodate the application of the stored agricultural source material is documented elsewhere in the Risk Management Plan.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
For properties where the person engaging in the activity has or intends to obtain, a nutrient management strategy approval as per the Nutrient Management Act, the person engaging in the activity may be deemed to be exempt from the requirement for a Risk Management Plan if the process described in O.Reg. 287/07, s. 61, is followed.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
04-04 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the storage of agricultural source material is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The policy applies to provincial instruments under the Nutrient Management Act
A nutrient management strategy shall satisfy the following provisions:
The nutrient management strategy shall not permit the expansion of an existing permanent nutrient storage facility, or the establishment of a new permanent nutrient storage facility, for agricultural source material in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The nutrient management strategy shall not permit the expansion of an existing temporary field nutrient storage site, or the establishment of a new temporary field nutrient storage site, for agricultural source material in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The nutrient management strategy shall not allow for the expansion of an existing permanent nutrient storage facility, or the establishment of a new permanent nutrient storage facility, for agricultural source material within the affected vulnerable areas, excluding WHPA-A, where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity) unless:
the expansion or new facility would provide the capacity necessary for a minimum of 240 days of storage for the number of nutrient units housed on the property; and
sufficient land base to accommodate the application of the stored agricultural source material is documented elsewhere in the nutrient management strategy; and
the expansion or new facility would be constructed to the following design standards, as a minimum:
for a liquid storage system, a synthetic liner, as defined by O. Reg. 267/03 s. 1; or
for a dry storage system, reinforced concrete floor and reinforced concrete walls; and
installation, material, engineering, setbacks and other such standards as specified under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002, and its regulations
The nutrient management strategy shall not allow for the expansion of an existing temporary field nutrient storage site, or the establishment of a new temporary field nutrient storage site, for agricultural source material within the affected vulnerable areas, excluding WHPA-A, where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity) unless:
the location of the temporary field site is identified in the nutrient management strategy; and
the period of use is restricted to not more than 30 days, or a lesser time period if deemed appropriate.
It is strongly encouraged that consideration be given to having capacity in the permanent nutrient storage facility for 365 days of storage for the number of nutrient units housed on the property.
For clarity, the improvement of an existing permanent nutrient storage facility is allowed where it is determined that such improvements would provide additional measures to protect sources of drinking water.
The Ministry of the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall:
Review all existing nutrient management strategies and nutrient management plans in all vulnerable areas where the storage of agricultural source material is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity);
Determine whether the approvals as described in clause (A) contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to satisfy clauses (1) to (4) above; and
Where the Ministry is of the opinion that the terms, conditions and measures contained in an approval as described in clause (B) are not adequate, cause such amendments to be made to the nutrient management strategy or nutrient management plan so as to satisfy clauses (1) to (4) above.
Existing approvals shall be reviewed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. Where amendments are deemed necessary, the existing approval shall be amended within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-07 and MP-08 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
06-01 |
The policy applies in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the application of non-agricultural source material to land is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The application of non-agricultural source material to land shall be prohibited. Therefore, the application of non-agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
06-02 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the application of non-agricultural source material to land is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The policy applies to the following provincial instruments:
- non-agricultural source material plans under the Nutrient Management Act
- environmental compliance approvals under the Environmental Protection Act
For all parts of properties located in WHPA-A where the application of non-agricultural source material is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity of future activity) and where the property is required to have a non-agricultural source material plan as per Part II of the Nutrient Management Act, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall:
a) review all existing non-agricultural source material plans and ensure all parts of the property within WHPA-A are excluded as an area where the application of non-agricultural source material could occur (existing activity); and
b) cause an amendment to be made to any existing non-agricultural source material plans that do not contain a provision as noted in clause (a) above (existing activity); and
c) ensure that any new non-agricultural source material plans specifically exclude all parts of the property within WHPA-A as an area where the application of non-agricultural source material could occur (future activity).
Environmental compliance approvals shall be reviewed in the same manner as clauses (a) to (c) above.
For all parts of properties located where the application of non-agricultural source material is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity of future activity), but not WHPA-A, and where a property is required to have a non-agricultural source material plan as per Part II of the Nutrient Management Act, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall:
1. Review all existing non-agricultural source material plans (existing activity);
2. Determine whether the approvals as described in clause 1 contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the application of non-agricultural source material ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; and
3. Where the Ministry is of the opinion that the terms, conditions and measures contained in an approval as described in clause 1 are not adequate, make such amendments to the approval so as to ensure that the application of non-agricultural source material ceases to be a significant drinking water threat;
4. Ensure that any new non-agricultural source material plans contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the application of non-agricultural source material never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Environmental compliance approvals shall be reviewed in the same manner as clauses (1) to (4) above.
Existing approvals shall be reviewed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan, or, in the case of environmental compliance approvals, such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. Where amendments are deemed necessary, the existing approval shall be amended within 12 months of the review, or, in the case of environmental compliance approvals, such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities.
Monitoring policies MP-07 and MP-08 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
07-01 |
The policy applies in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material shall be prohibited. Therefore, the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
07-02 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The policy applies to the following provincial instrument:
- non-agricultural source material plans under the Nutrient Management Act
For all parts of properties located in WHPA-A where the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity of future activity) and where the property is required to have a non-agricultural source material plan as per Part II of the Nutrient Management Act, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall:
a) review all existing non-agricultural source material plans and ensure all parts of the property within WHPA-A are excluded as an area where the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material could occur (existing activity); and
b) cause an amendment to be made to any non-agricultural source material plans that do not contain a provision as noted in clause (a) above (existing activity); and
c) ensure that any new non-agricultural source material plans specifically exclude all parts of the property within WHPA-A as an area where the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material could occur (future activity).
For all parts of properties located where the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity of future activity), but not WHPA-A, and where a property is required to have a non-agricultural source material plan as per Part II of the Nutrient Management Act, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall:
1. Review all existing non-agricultural source material plans (existing activity);
2. Determine whether the approvals as described in clause 1 contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; and
3. Where the Ministry is of the opinion that the terms, conditions and measures contained in an approval as described in clause 1 are not adequate, make such amendments to the approval so as to ensure that the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material ceases to be a significant drinking water threat;
4. Ensure that any new non-agricultural source material plans contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Existing approvals shall be reviewed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. Where amendments are deemed necessary, the existing approval shall be amended within 12 months of the review.
Monitoring policies MP-07 and MP-08 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
08-01 |
The policy applies in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the application of commercial fertilizer to land would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The application of commercial fertilizer to land shall be prohibited.
Therefore, the application of commercial fertilizer to land is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
08-02 |
The policy applies in:
all vulnerable areas where the application of commercial fertilizer to land is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity); and
all vulnerable areas, except WHPA-A, where the application of commercial fertilizer to land would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity)
The application of commercial fertilizer to land may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the application of commercial fertilizer to land is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The plan shall meet the guidelines with respect to the contents of a nutrient management plan established under Part III of O.Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act.
It is recommended that NMAN software or similar be utilized to assist in calculations. The calculations shall be reviewed annually and the Risk Management Plan updated so that it accurately reflects the anticipated operation on the farm unit during the following year
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
For properties where the person engaging in the activity has or intends to obtain, a nutrient management plan approval as per the Nutrient Management Act, the person engaging in the activity may be deemed to be exempt from the requirement for a Risk Management Plan if the process described in O.Reg. 287/07, s. 61, is followed.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
09-01 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall address:
1) product handling
2) product storage
3) record keeping
4) disposal methods
5) spills plan.
For the expansion or improvement of an existing commercial fertilizer storage facility, or the establishment of a new storage facility, the Risk Management Plan shall include the following requirements:
For liquid fertilizer:
A secondary containment system consisting of either :
A double-walled tank; and a reinforced concrete pad that extends one metre beyond the edges of the tank; and a visible interstitial alarm; or
A total containment system with a berm and liner capable of containing 120% of the volume of the stored material; and
Other such measures so as to comply with applicable regulations or meet best management practices
For solid fertilizer:
A roofed structure so as to prevent exposure to precipitation; and
A reinforced concrete pad that extends one metre beyond the edges of the stored material; and
Other such measures so as to comply with regulations or meet best management practices.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
1-1-F |
New or expanding (future) waste disposal sites as defined in Part V of the Environmental Protection Act are prohibited where they would be a significant drinking water threat in the applicable areas. Policy 1-3-F is a complementary land use planning policy to this Prescribed Instrument policy.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A, B and C (vulnerability score of 8 or greater) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
b) IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Belleville, Picton, Ameliasburgh, Point Anne, Deseronto and Napanee.
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Section 39(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must conform (See Appendix C, List C)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The Ministry of the Environment shall prepare an annual summary by February 1st, of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcome of the policy and make that report available to the Quinte Source Protection Authority. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
1-2-E |
Where an existing waste disposal site is in an area where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the waste disposal site includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the waste disposal site ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. If no Environmental Compliance Approval is in place for the waste disposal site (e.g. closed landfill) an instrument shall be used to identify any monitoring and remedial action measures necessary to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A, B and C (vulnerability score of 8 or greater) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
b) IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Belleville, Picton, Ameliasburgh, Point Anne, Deseronto and Napanee.
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Section 43(1) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List C)
Effective Date: Within three years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The Ministry of the Environment shall prioritize annual compliance inspections based on proximity to drinking water systems where significant threats are being managed through the use of Prescribed Instruments. The Ministry of the Environment shall provide a report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year summarizing actions taken on the implementation of this policy, during the previous calendar year. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1-3-F |
The municipality shall prohibit future waste disposal sites or the expansion of an existing waste disposal site where the following types of waste disposal sites would be significant drinking water threats:
Application of untreated septage to land;
Storage, treatment, and discharge of tailings from mines;
Land farming of petroleum refining waste;
Land filling of hazardous waste;
Land filling of municipal waste;
Land filling of solid, non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste;
Liquid industrial waste injection into a well;
PCB (Polychlorinated biphenyl) waste storage;
Storage of hazardous waste at disposal sites; and
Storage of certain hazardous wastes.
Implementer: Municipality (Land Use Planning)
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A, B and C (vulnerability score of 8 or greater) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
b) IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Belleville, Picton, Ameliasburgh, Point Anne, Deseronto and Napanee.
Tools: Land Use Planning pursuant to Section 39(1)(a) of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and the Planning Act.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The Municipality shall submit to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year a summary of how this policy was implemented during the previous calendar year. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
1-4-E |
The Ministry of the Environment shall issue appropriate instruments (e.g. Environmental Compliance Approvals, Provincial Officers Orders and Directors Orders) that include a requirement for a detailed environmental monitoring plan for the applicable landfill sites identified as conditions in Belleville and Picton. The instruments shall also identify any remedial action measures to adequately manage the risk.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Belleville IPZ 1 and 2 (Zwicks Park)
b) Picton IPZ 2 (Delhi Park)
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Section 39(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List C)
Effective Date: Within three years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The ministry shall prepare an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection policy and make that report available to the Source Protection Authority. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1-5-E |
The municipality shall collect raw water samples quarterly from the Belleville and Picton intakes for monitoring of parameters indicative of landfill leachate. The results are to be compared with the results of the monitoring of any offsite contamination from the former landfill sites to assist in determining if contaminants leaching from the two former landfills are present at the drinking water system intakes.
If it is determined that contaminants are reaching the intake, the municipality shall take the appropriate remedial action to prevent contamination from the former landfill site from reaching the intake and verify that the treatment processes are adequate.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Belleville IPZ 1 and 2 (Zwicks Park)
b) Picton IPZ 2 (Delhi Park)
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26(1)(v) of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List E)
Effective Date: Within three years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall:
1) Provide a report prepared by a qualified professional to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year summarizing the results and analysis of the water quality monitoring, during the previous calendar year;
2) Analyze the results of the monitoring as required by Policy 1-4-E and this policy to assess if impact from the landfill site on the drinking water system is occurring. These results for the previous calendar year are to be reviewed to determine if remedial action is required. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1-6-E&F |
Where a waste disposal site (existing and/or future) could be a moderate or low drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment should ensure that existing instruments that govern the waste disposal site include appropriate terms and conditions to make sure that:
1) The waste disposal site (existing) is a managed drinking water threat; or
2) The waste disposal site (future) never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The Ministry of the Environment should consider the location of vulnerable areas for the protection of drinking water when issuing Environmental Compliance Approvals for new or expanding waste disposal sites.
If prescribed instruments are not in place for the waste disposal site (e.g. closed landfill) the Ministry should identify any monitoring and remedial action measures necessary to ensure the activity is not a threat to drinking water.
Note: For existing sites the policy applies when decisions are made on amendments to the Environmental Compliance Approval associated with changes to the waste site or operations.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
The Quinte Source Protection Region
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Sections 39(7) and 43(1) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Have Regard To (See Appendix C, List D)
Effective Date: Within five years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J):
The ministry shall prepare an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection policy and make that report available to the Source Protection Authority. |
Quinte |
Low, Moderate |
Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
1-7-E & F |
Existing and future waste disposal sites that do not require approval under the Environmental Protection Act (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval) are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where they could be significant drinking water threats. This policy addresses the following threat sub categories:
Waste Disposal Site - PCB Waste Storage;
Waste Disposal Site - Storage Of Hazardous Waste At Disposal Sites;
Waste Disposal Site - Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t)
or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste under Ontario Regulation 347/09.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
Waste Disposal Site - PCB Waste Storage, Waste Disposal Site - Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste:
WHPA A and B, and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Picton, and Ameliasburgh.
Waste Disposal Site - Storage Of Hazardous Waste At Disposal Sites:
WHPA A and B, IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Belleville (IPZ 1), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Napanee (IPZ 1) and Point Anne (IPZ 1 and WHPA and B).
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
1-8-E & F |
Policy 1-8-E & F: Restricted Land Use Risk Management Plans for Waste Disposal Sites Not Regulated by Ontario Regulation 347/09
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where waste disposal sites require Risk Management Plans (Policy 1-7-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
Waste Disposal Site - PCB Waste Storage, Waste Disposal Site - Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste:
WHPA A and B, and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Picton, and Ameliasburgh.
Waste Disposal Site - Storage Of Hazardous Waste At Disposal Sites:
WHPA A and B, IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Belleville (IPZ 1), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Napanee (IPZ 1) and Point Anne (IPZ 1 and WHPA and B).
Note that in these areas this policy is applicable to commercial sites but not residential properties.
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.01 |
Education and Outreach programs designed to increase awareness and understanding of drinking water threats, and promote best management practices as a means of reducing the risks to drinking water sources, shall be developed and implemented collaboratively by Municipal/Conservation Authority/Provincial partners with the Conservation Authority providing a lead role.
The programs shall address low, moderate and significant drinking water threats with the priority placed on significant drinking water threats and activities which may contribute to an issue. The focus should be on incorporating Drinking Water Source Protection messaging into existing education and outreach materials and programs as a first priority. New education and outreach materials and programs may also be developed and implemented, if deemed necessary and/or appropriate, and be subject to available funding.
Municipalities and Conservation Authorities, in collaboration with the Province (Ministry of Environment), should consider options for the long-term support of education and outreach programs. The program scope shall be subject to available funding. MECP was here. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.02 |
In accordance with Section 22 (7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of Environment as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design signage, to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPA) and Intake Protection Zones (IPZ). The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial highways within WHPAs with a vulnerability score of 10, within IPZs with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher, or within an IPZ-3 (event based areas). |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.03 |
As part of an overall education and outreach program within each Source Protection Area (SPA), Municipalities shall consider placing signage, where municipal arterial roads are located within Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPA) with a vulnerability score of 10, within Intake Protection Zones (IPZ) with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher, or within an IPZ-3 (event based areas). Municipalities would be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of signs consistent with the design developed by the Province in collaboration with the SPA in accordance with policy 1.02. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.04 |
Organizations including but not limited to Municipalities and Conservation Authorities, in collaboration with the Province (Ministry of Environment) and other bodies where possible, shall consider supporting existing incentive programs and/or where deemed necessary or appropriate, support the development and implementation of new incentive programs directed at existing significant drinking water threats with a priority on existing threats contributing to an issue.
Such incentive programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, assisting with the costs of implementing risk mitigation practices and transport pathway maintenance and decommissioning and shall be subject to available funding.
Incentives shall only be considered for existing significant drinking water threats as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07. However, incentives shall not be considered for the application of untreated septage; the storage of mine tailings; the application of non-agricultural source material (NASM); the handling and storage of NASM; and the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.05 |
The Province (Ministry of Environment) is encouraged to continue funding the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program, as outlined in Section 97 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and Section 69 of O. Reg. 287/07, to adequately fund risk management practices for existing significant drinking water threats with a priority on existing threats contributing to an issue. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.06 |
All planning decisions shall be in conformity with those policies that address significant drinking water threats as per Section 39 (1) (a) of
the Clean Water Act. All planning decisions shall have regard to those policies that address low and moderate drinking water threats as per
Section 39 (1) (b) of the Clean Water Act.
At minimum, the Municipalities shall amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws to:
a. Identify the vulnerable areas in which a significant drinking water threat could occur;
b. Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that
is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to
conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as
such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by the
policies contained in the Source Protection Plan;
c. Identify the significant drinking water threats that are prohibited
through Prescribed Instruments, or Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, in
accordance with the significant drinking water threat-specific policies
contained in this Source Protection Plan;
d. Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the
significant drinking water threat specific land use policies or to have regard for the low and/or moderate
threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection
Plan; and,
e. Incorporate a cross-reference indicating an applicant cannot make a planning application unless it includes a notice issued by the risk management official, as set out in Section 59(1) of the CWA and Section 62 of O. Reg, 287/07. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
1.07 |
In areas where Sections 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act applies, all land uses identified within the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-laws, with the exception of residential uses, are hereby designated for the purposes of Section 59 (Restricted Land Uses). Activities identified as significant drinking water threats through event-based modelling are exempted from this policy (as they are covered by policy 1.08).
Within these designated land use categories and areas, a notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with Section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act shall be required prior to approval of any Planning Act or Building Permit application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site-specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site-specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as the case may be, is satisfied that:
* The application complies with the written direction from the Risk Management Official; and
* The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.08 |
For any commercial, agricultural and industrial land uses, identified within municipal Official Plans and/or Zoning By-laws, that are located in areas where event-based modelling has identified activities as significant drinking water threats, Sections 57 and 58 of the Clean Water Act apply. These areas are hereby designated for the purposes of Section 59 (Restricted Land Use).
Within these designated areas, a notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with Section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act shall be required prior to approval
of any Planning Act or Building Permit application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site-specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific-land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as the case may be, is satisfied that:
* The application complies with the situations specified in the written direction from the Risk Management Official; and
* The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in by the application. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.09 |
Except as set out below, within another policy within this Source Protection Plan, or as otherwise prescribed by the Clean Water Act, the policies contained in the Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
1. Policies written pursuant to Section 22(6) of the Clean Water Act (other contents), shall be implemented within two (2) years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
2. Policies written pursuant to Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act (incentive programs, education and outreach) programs shall be implemented within two (2) years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
3. Policies written pursuant to Section 40(2) and Section 42 of the Clean Water Act (deadlines for Official Plan and Zoning by-law conformity through policy 1.06), shall establish the following implementation timing:
a. Updates to Official Plans shall be initiated as soon as possible after the effective date of the Source Protection Plan with the goal of being adopted within three (3) years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan; and
b. Updates to zoning By-laws shall be initiated as soon as possible after the effective date of the Source Protection Plan and be adopted within three (3) years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan or, where amendments to the Official Plan are required to implement the SPP policies, within three (3) years of the effective date of those Official Plan amendments.
4. Policies written pursuant to Section 43(2) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) (prescribed instrument), regarding the amendment to the prescribed instruments shall conform to the Source Protection Plan within three (3) years of the effective date of the Plan.
5. If an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan takes effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location (as per Sec. 58(4) of the CWA, 2006), the policies written pursuant to Section 58 shall apply on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date the notice is given. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.10 |
1. Despite the definition of existing, where development is being proposed by one or more of the following applications:
a. A site-specific amendment to a zoning by-law under Subsection 34(10) of the Planning Act;
b. A site plan under Subsection 41(4) of the Planning Act; or
c. A building permit under the Building Code Act,
a significant drinking water threat activity that is to be established as part of the proposed development may be considered existing for the purposes of complying with the applicable significant drinking water
threat policies, provided that:
* The application was deemed to be complete by the applicable approval authority as of the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect; and
* The applicant has certified to the satisfaction of the implementing body named in the applicable significant drinking water threat policy that a particular significant drinking water threat activity is
specifically intended to be undertaken as a part of the proposed development.
Where further development approvals are required to establish the development and related significant drinking water threat activity
proposed by such application, that activity may also be considered as existing for the purposes of determining whether those subsequent
approvals comply with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies.
The above noted transition provisions shall cease to apply where any of the approvals or applications required to implement the proposed development have been denied by the applicable approval authority
and/or, where applicable, the relevant appeal body, or have lapsed or been withdrawn.
2. Despite the definition of existing, where a significant drinking
water threat activity is directly related to a land use permitted by
existing zoning and does not require any approvals under
the Planning Act or Ontario Building Code Act to be lawfully established
on a property, such activity shall be considered existing for the
purposes of compliance with the applicable significant drinking water
threat policies. This provision shall cease to apply at such a time as a Risk
Management Official or Inspector has conducted a property-specific
assessment and documented the significant drinking water threat
activities undertaken or established on a property as of that point in
time, following which any significant drinking water threat activity not so documented
shall be considered as new or future from that point forward.
3. Despite the definition of existing, where a significant drinking
water threat activity is being proposed by way of a new or amended
prescribed instrument, it shall be considered existing for the purposes
of complying with the applicable significant drinking water threat
policies provided that the application for the new or amended prescribed
instrument was deemed to be complete by the applicable approval
authority as of the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
1.11 |
Where a policy in this Source Protection Plan refers to future, new or existing, the following definitions shall apply:
Existing: Means undertaken or established as of the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Future or New: Means not existing as defined in this Source Protection Plan. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
10-01 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the application of pesticide to land is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The policy applies to the following provincial instrument:
- permits for land exterminations
- under the Pesticides Act
The application of pesticides to land shall only occur in accordance with any permit requirements as set out in the Pesticides Act and Ontario Regulation 63/09.
Monitoring policy MP-03 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
10-02 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the application of pesticide to land is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity) and the person engaging in the activity does not require a permit under the Pesticides Act and Ontario Regulation 63/09. The application of pesticides to land may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the application of pesticides to land is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The plan shall meet the guidelines with respect to the contents of an approval under the Pesticides Act and Ontario Regulation 63/09.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
10-1-E&F |
The existing and future application of pesticide to land for non-agricultural uses is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited where it could be a significant threat in the WHPA A.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Tweed, Peats Point and Point Anne.
Tools: Prohibition pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (see Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
10-2-E&F |
The existing and future application of pesticides for non-agricultural uses where it could be a significant threat is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and requires a risk management plan. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the application of pesticides in the applicable areas. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) Best management practices for the application of pesticides;
2) Requirements for records for pesticide applications;
3) Requirements for accreditation with the Integrated Pest Management Council of Canada;
4) Considerations for natural areas and increasing buffer zones along water courses;
5) Requirements for appropriate training of any personnel applying pesticides;
6) Any other measure deemed necessary to reduce the risk of a release to the environment;
7) The timing of plan implementation;
8) Monitoring and reporting;
9) A reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA B (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
b) IPZ 1 and 2 and WHPA E (vulnerability score of 8.1 or greater) - Belleville (IPZ 1 and 2), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Napanee (IPZ 1 and 2), Point Anne (IPZ 1), Madoc (WHPA E) and Peats Point (WHPA E).
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
10-3-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where the application of pesticides for non-agricultural uses is prohibited (Policy 10-2-E & F) or requires a risk management plan (Policy 10-3-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Prohibition:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
b) Risk Management Plans:
WHPA B (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
IPZ 1 and 2 and WHPA E (vulnerability score of 8.1 or greater) - Belleville (IPZ 1 and 2), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Napanee (IPZ 1 and 2), Point Anne (IPZ 1), Madoc (WHPA E) and Peats Point (WHPA E).
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next 5-year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
11-01 |
The policy applies in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of pesticide would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The expansion of existing handling or storage facilities for pesticides beyond the capacity existing as of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan shall be prohibited.
The establishment of new handling or storage facilities for pesticides shall be prohibited.
Therefore, the handling and storage of pesticide is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
11-02 |
The policy applies in:
all vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of pesticide is a significant drinking water threat, except for the expansion of existing handling or storage facilities for pesticides within WHPA-A (existing activity or future activity); and
all vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of pesticide would be a significant drinking water threat except for the establishment of new handling or storage facilities for pesticides within WHPA-A (future activity).
The handling and storage of pesticide may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan where:
the handling and storage is an existing activity for all vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat; or
the handling and storage is a proposed activity for all vulnerable areas, except WHPA-A, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. Therefore, the handling and storage of pesticide is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall contain:
1) product handling;
2) product storage;
3) record-keeping;
4) disposal methods;
5) spills response plan.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
11-1-E&F |
The handling and storage of pesticides for non-agricultural uses is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited in the applicable areas where it could be a significant drinking water threat.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Prohibition pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
11-2-E&F |
The existing and future handling and storage of pesticides for non-agricultural uses is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore requires a risk management plan where it could be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the storage and handling of pesticides in the applicable areas. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) Adequate measures for safe storage including proper storage facilities, leak detection and containments;
2) An emergency contingency plan;
3) Requirements for appropriate training of personnel handling and storing pesticides;
4) Any other measure deemed necessary to reduce the risk of a release to the environment;
5) The timing of plan implementation;
6) Monitoring and reporting;
7) A reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA B (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
b) IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9) - Picton (IPZ 2), Belleville (IPZ 1), Deseronto (IPZ 1) and Napanee (IPZ 1).
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Plan (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
11-3-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where the handling and storage of pesticides for non-agricultural uses are prohibited (Policy 11-1-E & F) or require risk management plans (Policy 11-2-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Prohibition:
WHPA A and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
b) Risk Management Plan:
WHPA B (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9) - Picton (IPZ 2), Belleville (IPZ 1), Deseronto (IPZ 1) and Napanee (IPZ 1).
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
12-01 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the application of road salt is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The application of road salt may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan and is therefore designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act, where the following applies:
a) Where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
b) Salt is or could be applied to the property;
c) The salt application area is equal to or greater than 200 square metres or 8 parking spots; and
d) The property is used for any land uses except residential consisting of four units or fewer.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall:
a) follow best management practices consistent with those used across Canada;
b) employ the latest winter maintenance technologies;
c) identify actions to improve practices in the general use of road salts.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
Notwithstanding the above, a Risk Management Plan will also be required for any municipal properties where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established within five years of the amendment to the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
12-02 |
Where the application of road salt is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the municipality shall review and, if necessary, revise or issue new Salt Management Plans for the application of salt on roadways in all Wellhead Protection Areas. The Salt Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location to reduce the potential for salt-related surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration and meet the objectives of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for Environmental Management of Road Salts including the salt vulnerable area mapping to include areas where significant threats can occur.
All locations for Salt Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established within five years of the amendment to the Source Protection Plan taking effect
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
12-03 |
To ensure any existing or new application of road salt, where road salt application is or would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Transportation should review and, if necessary, revise or issue new Salt Management Plans for the application of salt on roadways in all Wellhead Protection Areas.
The Salt Management Plan should include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location reduce the potential for salt-related surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration and meet the objectives of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for Environmental Management of Road Salts including the salt vulnerable area mapping to include areas where significant threats can occur.
All locations for Salt Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established within five years of the amendment to the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
12-04 |
To ensure any existing or new application of road salt, where road salt application is or would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be or never becomes a significant threat, the municipality and / or the Public Health Unit shall develop and implement an education initiative addressing the application of road salt. The education program shall encourage the implementation of best management practices that form the core of the Smart About Salt or similar accreditation program to reduce the impact of winter de-icing activities. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
12-1-E&F |
Where the existing and future application of road salt is a significant drinking water threat, municipalities shall prepare or, review and update their salt management plan to ensure compliance with the most up-to-date Environment Canada's Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salts and Transportation Association of Canada documents. Where the application of road salt is a moderate or low threat the municipality should follow the same procedure.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Significant: Picton (IPZ 1)*
b) Moderate and Low:
WHPA A, B, C and D and IPZ 1, 2 and 3(a) Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Belleville, Point Anne, Deseronto, Napanee, Ameliasburgh, Picton and Bayside. *
* Refer to Impervious Surface Area Maps in the Updated Assessment
Report, 2011 to determine exact areas where policies apply. For Bayside refer to the Trent Conservation Coalition's Assessment Report, 2011.
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26 of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (for significant) - See Appendix C, List E, Strategic (for moderate and low) - See Appendix C, List J
Effective Date: Within two years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Plan (See Appendix C, List F and J):
For areas where the application of road salt is a significant threat the Municipality shall provide an up-to-date copy of their Salt Management Plan to the Quinte Source Protection Authority and shall report by February 1st if updates/changes are made to the Plan during the previous calendar year. Where the application of road salt is a moderate or low threat the municipality should follow the same procedure. |
Quinte |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
12-2-E&F |
Where the application of road salt is a significant, moderate, or low drinking water threat the Ministry of Transportation should ensure their salt management plan is up-to-date to comply with Environment Canada's Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salts and Transportation Association of Canada documents.
Implementers: Ministry of Transportation
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Significant: Picton (IPZ 1)*
b) Moderate and Low:
WHPA A, B, C and D and IPZ 1, 2 and 3(a) Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Belleville, Point Anne, Deseronto, Napanee, Ameliasburgh, Picton and Bayside. *
* Refer to Impervious Surface Area Maps in the Updated Assessment Report, 2011 to determine exact areas where policies apply. For Bayside refer to the Trent Conservation Coalition's Assessment Report, 2011.
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26 of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J and K)
Effective Date: Within one year of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The Ministry of Transportation should provide an up-to-date copy of their Salt Management Plan to the Quinte Source Protection Authority and shall report by February 1st if updates/changes are made to the Plan during the previous calendar year. |
Quinte |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
12-3-E&F |
Where the existing and future application of road salt for commercial use is a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore requires a risk management plan. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the application of road salt. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) Any existing risk management measures already in place;
2) The measures most suitable to reduce the risk posed by the activity;
3) Provisions for consideration of the following:
Vulnerable areas,
Water courses,
Storage facilities (permanent and temporary) for salt,
Site drainage;
4) Protocols and emergency measures to be followed in the event of a spill and any other measures deemed necessary to reduce the risk of a release to the environment;
5) Requirements for appropriate training of any personnel applying road salt;
6) The timing of plan implementation;
7) Monitoring and reporting requirements;
8) A provision that the risk management official is to be notified of any changes in operation such that the Plan can be updated;
9) A provision in reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating that the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to parking lots on commercial properties and roads in the following areas:
IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) Picton *
* Refer to Impervious Surface Area Maps in the Updated Assessment Report, 2011 to determine exact areas where policies apply.
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When takes effect for future activities and within two years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit an annual report by February
1st to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory
requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
12-4-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where the application of road salt requires a risk management plan (Policy 12-3-E & F), all paved areas in commercial land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
Picton IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10)
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
13-01 |
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The handling and storage of road salt may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan and is therefore designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
For clarity, a Risk Management Plan is required where the following applies:
a) Where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
b) Salt is handled or stored on the property; and
c) The property is used for any land uses except residential consisting of four units or fewer.
The risk management plan, at a minimum, will include terms and conditions that mirror a salt management plan, and comply with contemporary standards to ensure the handling and storage of road salt ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established within five years of the amendment to the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
13-02 |
To ensure any existing or new handling and storage of road salt, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be or never becomes a significant threat, the municipality and / or the Public Health Unit shall develop and implement an education initiative addressing the handling and storage of road salt. The education program shall encourage the implementation of best management practices that form the core of the Smart About Salt or similar accreditation program to reduce the impact of winter de-icing activities. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
13-1-E&F |
Where it could be a significant drinking water threat, the existing and future handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9) - Where the quantity of road salt is greater than 5,000 tonnes (Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Belleville IPZ 1, Deseronto IPZ 1, Napanee IPZ 1, Ameliasburgh IPZ 2 and Picton IPZ 2).
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Where the quantity of road salt is
greater than 500 tonnes (Ameliasburgh, Point Anne and Picton).
Tools: Prohibition pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within one year for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
13-2-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where the handling and storage of road salt are prohibited (Policy 13-1-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9) - Where the quantity of road salt is greater than 5,000 tonnes (Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Belleville IPZ 1, Deseronto IPZ 1, Napanee IPZ 1, Ameliasburgh IPZ 2 and Picton IPZ 2).
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Where the quantity of road salt is greater than 500 tonnes (Ameliasburgh, Point Anne and Picton).
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
14-01 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the storage of snow is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The storage of snow shall be prohibited under the following conditions:
the snow is stored at or above grade and the storage area is:
more than 1 but not more than 5 hectares; or
more than 5 hectares
the snow is stored below grade and the storage area is:
- at least 0.01 but not more than 0.5 hectares; or
- more than 0.5 but not more than 1 hectare; or
- more than 1 but not more than 5 hectares; or
- more than 5 hectares.
Therefore, the storage of snow is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Notwithstanding clause (A.1) above, the storage of snow is not prohibited where:
- the snow storage constitutes the snowbanks immediately adjacent to a travelled roadway; and
- the snow storage is contained within the road allowance for the travelled roadway.
With regards to any snow storage sites existing as of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan, the policy takes effect eight months following the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
14-02 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the storage of snow is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The storage of snow may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan under the following conditions:
the storage of snow where the snow is stored at or above grade and the storage area is at least 0.01 but not more than 0.5 hectares; or
the storage of snow where the snow is stored at or above grade and the storage area is more than 0.5 but not more than 1 hectare.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. Therefore, the storage of snow is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall address:
1) runoff management;
2) implementation of best management practices;
3) consideration of alternative sites outside of the affected vulnerable area
Notwithstanding clause (A) and (B) above, a Risk Management Plan is not required where:
the snow storage constitutes the snowbanks immediately adjacent to a travelled roadway; and
the snow storage is contained within the road allowance for the travelled roadway.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
14-1-E&F |
Where it could be a significant drinking water threat the storage area of snow is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan any future activity involving the storage of snow in vulnerable areas. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) The measures most suitable to reduce the risk posed by the activity as available through the Transportation Association of Canada best management practices manual;
2) Provisions for consideration of the following:
Vulnerable areas,
Water courses,
Site selection and preparation,
Site drainage,
Off-season maintenance,
Monitoring and record keeping,
Site decommissioning;
3) Monitoring and reporting requirements;
4) The timing of plan implementation;
5) Requirements for appropriate training of any personnel handling and removing snow;
6) An appropriate inspection cycle to monitor compliance with and effectiveness of the Plan;
7) Include a reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to private and public parking lots and roads in the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) Ameliasburgh, Picton and Point Anne - where the storage area is larger than 0.01 hectares.
b) IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability
score of 9) Ameliasburgh (IPZ 2), Picton (IPZ2), Belleville (IPZ1),
Deseronto (IPZ1), and Napanee (IPZ1) - where the storage area is larger
than 1 hectare.
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st
of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the
mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in
Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
14-2-E & F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where storage of snow requires a risk management plan (Policy 14-1-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to private and public parking lots and roads in the following areas:
WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) Ameliasburgh, Picton and Point Anne.
IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9) Ameliasburgh (IPZ 2), Picton (IPZ2), Belleville (IPZ1), Deseronto (IPZ1) and Napanee (IPZ1).
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
15-01 |
The policy applies in:
- all Wellhead Protection Areas where the handling and storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity); and
- all Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 10 where the handling and storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
Furthermore, the policy applies under the following circumstances:
the quantity of fuel is more than 2,500 L; or
the quantity of fuel is more than 250 L but not more than 2,500 L and where the facility is a bulk plant or a facility that manufacturers or refines fuel
The expansion of an existing facility is permitted, if it can be proven to the Risk Management Official's satisfaction that the expansion provides greater integrity to the system and reduces the risk to the drinking water supply.
The establishment of a new facility shall be prohibited.
Therefore, the handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
15-02 |
The policy applies in:
1. all Wellhead Protection Areas where the handling and storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity); and
2. all Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 10 where the handling and storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
Furthermore, the policy applies under the following circumstances:
A. the quantity of fuel is more than 250 L but not more than 2,500 L; and where the facility is not a bulk plant or a facility that manufacturers or refines fuel
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The handling and storage of fuel may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan and is therefore designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall contain:
1) a requirement for an annual inspection as per Section 14 of the CAN/CSA-B139-00 Installation Code for Oil Burning Equipment that includes an inspection of the storage tank; or
2) requirements for record keeping and documentation, including the annual inspection report and a copy of the ten-year comprehensive inspection by the fuel oil distributor;
3) provisions for the proper disposal of unused fuel;
4) a spills response plan;
5) requirements for the following containment measures:
i. a double-walled storage tank;
ii. a visible interstitial leak alarm;
iii. if the tank is situated near a floor drain, sump, indoor well, or cracks in the floor, then an electronic monitoring system for spills and leaks with a visible and audible alarm;
6) a deadline for the containment measures identified in clause (5) to be in place within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
A Risk Management Plan shall not be approved unless the Risk Management Plan contains provisions requiring:
a) an impervious floor surface in the vicinity of the tank; and
b) the body of the tank and any supply lines to not be in direct contact with the ground.
For clarity, the policy only applies to storage located inside a building.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
15-03 |
The policy applies in:
all Wellhead Protection Areas where the handling and storage of fuel is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity); and
all Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 10 where the handling and storage of fuel is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity).
Furthermore, the policy applies under the following circumstances:
the quantity of fuel is more than 2,500 L; or
the quantity of fuel is more than 250 L but not more than 2,500 L and where the facility is a bulk plant or a facility that manufacturers or refines fuel
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The handling and storage of fuel may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall address:
1) product handling;
2) product storage;
3) record keeping and documentation, including any inspection reports;
4) disposal methods;
5) spills response plan; and
6) containment measures.
The expansion of an existing facility is permitted, if it can be proven to the Risk Management Official’s satisfaction that the expansion provides greater integrity to the system and reduces the risk to the drinking water supply.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
15-04 |
The policy applies where storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity) within the following areas:
1. for Events-based Area for the Kincardine Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.1.K.K.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 3,000 L or more (EBA-3000);
2. for Event-based Area for the Meaford Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.2.M.M.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 2,000 L or more (EBA- 2000)
The establishment of new fuel storage shall be prohibited. The expansion or replacement of existing fuel storage is permitted, and shall be governed by Policy 15-05, if it can be demonstrated to the Risk Management Official�s satisfaction that the expansion or replacement will provide greater integrity. The establishment of any new fuel storage at a new location in the Meaford EBA- 2000, which is being constructed to replace any existing storage to service the marina in Meaford is not prohibited and is therefore designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act and governed by Policy 15-05.
Therefore, the storage of fuel is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act. Monitoring policy MP-23 applies
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
15-05 |
The policy applies where the storage of fuel is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity) within the following areas:
1. for Events-based Area for the Kincardine Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.1.K.K.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 3,000 L or more (EBA-3000);
2. for Events-based Area for the Meaford Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.2.M.M.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 2,000 L or more (EBA-2000)
The policy applies where the storage of fuel is a significant drinking water threat (existing and future activity) within the following areas:
1. for Events-based Area for the Kincardine Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.1.K.K.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 5,000 L or more (EBA-5000), and 10,000 L or more (EBA-10000);
2. for Events-based Area for the Meaford Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.2.M.M.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 5,000 L or more (EBA-5000), and 12,000 L or more (EBA-12000);
3. for Events-based Area for the Wiarton Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.2.SBP.W.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 5,000 L or more (EBA-5000), and 8,000 L or more (EBA-8000);
4. for Events-based Area for the Lion’s Head Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.3.NBP.LH.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 5,000 L or more (EBA-5000), 7,500 L or more (EBA-7500), and 22,500 L or more (EBA-22500);
5. for Events-based Area for the Owen Sound Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.2.OS.RN.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 15,000 L or more (EBA-15000), 25,000 L or more (EBA-25000), and 50,000 L or more (EBA-50000);
6. for Events-based Area for the Southampton Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.1.SS.S.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 13,000 L or more (EBA-13000), and 22,500 L or more (EBA-22500);
7. for Events-based Area for the Thornbury Drinking Water System (as shown on Map 5.2.BM.T.1) where fuel is stored in a quantity of 50,000 L or more (EBA-50000), and 100,000 L or more (EBA-100000)
8. For Events-based Area for the East Linton Drinking Water System (as shown on map) where fuel stored in a quantity of 2,500L or more (EBA-2500), 5,000L or more (EBA-5000), and 10,000L or more (EBA-10000)
The capacity of existing fuel storage shall be determined and recorded within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
The expansion or replacement of existing fuel storage is permitted, if it can be demonstrated to the Risk Management Official’s satisfaction that the expansion or replacement will provide greater integrity.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The storage of fuel may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the storage of fuel is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall address:
1) product handling;
2) product storage;
3) record keeping and documentation, including any inspection reports;
4) disposal methods;
5) spills response plan; and
6) containment measures.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
15-1-F |
The future handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
The installation of new fuel storage tanks (greater than 250 and less than 2,500 litres) partially below and below grade is prohibited where they would be significant in WHPA A. The installation of new fuel storage tanks (greater than 2,500 litres) below or above grade is prohibited where they would be significant in WHPA A and B and IPZ 1.
The replacement of existing tanks is exempt.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Fuel tanks of between 250 and 2,500 litres capacity installed partially below and completely below grade (Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed),
b) WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Fuel tanks larger than 2,500 litres capacity installed below or above grade (Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Picton and Ameliasburgh).
Tools: Prohibition pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
15-2-E&F |
Where an 'at' or 'above' grade fuel storage tank (greater than 250 and less than 2,500 litres) could be a moderate drinking water threat, the municipality should require that tanks be replaced or installed in accordance with the Canadian Standards Association Code (B139, 2009) with a minimum requirement for a leak detection device and either double bottom or double walled tanks.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Fuel tanks of between 250 and 2,500 litres capacity installed at or above grade (Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed).
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Sections 32 and 26(1) of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future and within three years for existing.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit a report for the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year to include:
a) Copies of any bylaws established to require double bottom or double walled tanks with leak detection;
b) The number of fuel tanks that have been replaced and number of tanks that need to be upgraded to comply with the policy. |
Quinte |
Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
15-3-E |
Where the existing handling and storage of fuel in tanks greater than 2,500 litres is a significant drinking water threat and is therefore designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the handling and storage of fuel. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) Consideration to current approvals, precautionary measures and procedures;
2) Any changes deemed necessary to existing operating and maintenance practices;
3) Annual inspection protocols;
4) Measures for spill and secondary containments;
5) Emergency spill contingency measures;
6) Contaminant management plans where required;
7) Requirements for training and licensing;
8) The timing of plan implementation;
9) Monitoring programs and record keeping;
10) Reporting requirements;
11) A reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
The risk management plan will address any deficiencies in the existing measures that do not adequately manage the significant threat. Such measures would be developed in accordance with best management practices, the Ministry of the Environment Risk Management Catalogue, and relevant regulations and codes such as the Technical Standards and Safety Authority Liquid Fuel Handling Code 2007 as amended from time to time.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Risk Management Plans pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: Within one year of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
15-4-E |
The existing handling and storage of fuel in tanks of greater than 250 and less than 2,500 litres is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 where it is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the handling and storage of fuel. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) Requirements for an annual maintenance Inspection by a qualified licensed inspector (e.g. licensed oil burner technician by TSSA);
2) Requirements for correction of any deficiencies identified through the inspection;
3) Requirements to address any deficiencies in the existing measures that do not adequately manage the existing significant threat in accordance with best management practices, the Ministry of the Environment Risk Management Catalogue, and relevant regulations and codes such as Section 13 of the Canadian Standards Association Ontario Installation Code for Oil Burning Equipment (Based on CSA B139, with Ontario Amendments) 1st edition/200 as amended from time to time.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed.
Tools: Risk Management Plans pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: Within two years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy: (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
15-5-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where handling and storage of fuel is prohibited (Policy 15-1-F) or require risk management plans (Policy 15-3-E and 15-4-E), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
15-6-E |
Where the handling and storage of fuel at a facility as defined in Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 213/01 is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the Ministry of Consumer Services and the Ministry of the Environment are strongly encouraged to consider source water protection during the next scheduled code review.
In addition, the TSSA is strongly encouraged to continue to include information regarding new code requirements and leak resistant technology in its communications products, and request
fuel suppliers to:
Promote to their customers the importance of regular maintenance as described in Section 13 of the Ontario Installation Code for Oil-burning Equipment to increase awareness of and compliance with this requirement (this could be accomplished by
printing a reminder on the fuel bill).
Implementer: The Ministry of Consumer Services, Technical Standards and Safety Authority and Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) – Deloro, Madoc, Peats
Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Specify Action – Ministry of Consumer Services, Technical Standards and Safety Authority and Ministry of the Environment (Section 33 of the Clean Water Act, 2006).
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
16-01 |
The policy applies in WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) shall be prohibited where the total quantity of liquid product(s) is greater than 25 litres and contains any amount of any of the following:
Dioxane-1,4; or
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs); or
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE); or
Trichloroethylene or another DNAPL that could degrade to Trichloroethylene; or
Vinyl chloride or another DNAPL that could degrade to vinyl chloride.
Therefore, the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
16-02 |
The policy applies to the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) for all vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity) and in the WHPA-C (future activity).
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan where the total quantity of liquid product(s) is greater than 25 litres and contains any amount of any of the following:
• Dioxane-1,4
• Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
• Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
• Trichloroethylene or another DNAPL that could degrade to Trichloroethylene
• Vinyl chloride or another DNAPL that could degrade to vinyl chloride.
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. Therefore, the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall contain:
1) product handling;
2) product storage;
3) record keeping;
4) disposal methods;
5) spills response plan
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
16-03 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
A municipal by-law shall be enacted to control the disposal of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) into the municipal sewer.
The by-law shall contain the following provisions:
1) applies to all properties in a wellhead protection area zone A or B or C; and
2) comes into effect not later than two years after the effective date of the Source Protection Plan; and
3) prohibits the discharge of sewage containing:
Dioxane-1,4; or
one or more Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs); or
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE); or
Trichloroethylene or another DNAPL that could degrade to Trichloroethylene; or
Vinyl chloride or another DNAPL that could degrade to vinyl chloride.
The process to enact the by-law shall be initiated within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan and the by-law enacted within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring Policies MP-11 and MP-12 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
16-1-E&F |
Where it would be a significant threat in WHPA A, the handling and storage of DNAPLs for commercial or industrial use is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Tweed and Point Anne.
Tools: Prohibition pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
16-2-E&F |
The handling and storage of DNAPLS requires a risk management plan and is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 where it could be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the commercial and industrial storage and handling of DNAPLs in the applicable areas. The risk management official shall, as a minimum:
1) Establish adequate measures for storage safety including proper storage facilities, leak detection and containment;
2) Include an emergency contingency plan;
3) Specify appropriate training of personnel;
4) Require any other measure deemed necessary to reduce the risk of a release to the environment;
5) Include a reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA B and C - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Tweed and Point Anne.
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
16-3-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where DNAPLs are prohibited (Policy 16-1-E & F) or require risk management plans (Policy 16-2-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A, B and C - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Tweed and Point Anne.
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
17-01 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of an organic solvent would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The handling and storage of an organic solvent shall be prohibited. Therefore, the handling and storage of an organic solvent is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
17-02 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of an organic solvent is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity).
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The handling and storage of an organic solvent may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the handling and storage of an organic solvent is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
As a minimum, the Risk Management Plan shall address:
1) product handling
2) product storage
3) record keeping
4) disposal methods
5) spills response plan.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
17-03 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of an organic solvent is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
A municipal by-law shall be enacted to control the disposal of an organic solvent into the municipal sewer.
The by-law shall contain the following provisions:
1) applies to all properties in a wellhead protection area zone A or B with a vulnerability score of 10; and
2) comes into effect not later than two years after the effective date of the Source Protection Plan; and
3) prohibits the discharge of sewage containing:
Carbon tetrachloride; or
Chloroform; or
Methylene chloride (Dichloromethane); or
Pentachlorophenol.
The process to enact the by-law shall be initiated within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan and the by-law enacted within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-11 and MP-12 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
17-1-F |
The future handling and storage of organic solvents where it would be a significant drinking water threat in WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 with a vulnerability score of 10 is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited. The following tables indicate the chemical, quantity and circumstance that are significant in the applicable zones.
In WHPA A and B
Chemical
Quantity
Storage Circumstance
Carbon Tetrachloride
Greater than 25 L
Below or partially below grade
Carbon Tetrachloride
Greater than 250 L
Above Grade
Chloroform
Greater than 250 L
Below or partially below grade
Chloroform
Greater than 2,500 L
Above Grade
Methylene Chloride
(Dichloromethane)
Greater than 250 L
Below or partially below grade
Methylene Chloride
(Dichloromethane)
Greater than 2,500 L
Above Grade
Pentachlorophenol
Greater than 2,500 L
Below or partially below grade
In IPZ1 with a vulnerability score of 10
Chemical
Quantity
Storage Circumstance
Carbon Tetrachloride
Greater than 250 L
Above or below grade
Chloroform
Greater than 2,500 L
Above or below grade
Methylene Chloride
(Dichloromethane)
Greater than 2,500 L
Above or below grade
Pentachlorophenol
Greater than 2,500 L
Above or below grade
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Prohibition pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
17-2-E |
Where it is an existing significant drinking water threat, the handling and storage of organic solvents is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore requires a risk management plan. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the commercial and industrial storage and handling of organic solvents in the applicable areas. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) Consideration for existing risk management measures;
2) Best management practices for the storage and handling of organic solvents are being used;
3) Consideration of the following:
Vulnerable areas,
Water courses,
Surface drainage,
Water wells (both used and unused),
Storage facilities (location, type of containment and secondary containment),
Areas where organic solvents are handled;
4) Protocols and emergency response program to be followed in the event of spill of organic solvents and any other measures deemed necessary to reduce the risk of a release to the environment;
5) Training requirements of staff in all aspects of the risk management plan;
6) The timing of plan implementation;
7) Monitoring and reporting;
8) A reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Risk Management Plans pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: Within two years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
17-3-E&F |
Policy 17-3-E & F: Restricted Land Use for Handling and Storage of Organic Solvents
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where organic solvents are prohibited (Policy 17-1-F) or require risk management plans (Policy 17-2-E), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne, Tweed, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
18-01 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft shall be prohibited. Therefore, the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
18-1-F |
The municipality, where construction of an airport is being considered and airplane de-icing would be a significant drinking water threat, will work with Transport Canada, the airport operator, the de-icing service provider, the air carriers and companies or individuals responsible for the disposal of the used de-icing fluid to ensure that the required Airplane De-Icing Fluid Management Plan addresses concerns related the drinking water supply. The plan shall include but is not limited to:
1) Contingency plans for emergency situations such as spills;
2) Details of the area where the de-icing operation will take place and the proximity to IPZs and WHPAs;
3) Details on the storage and handling of de-icing fluids;
4) Application details including operator training;
5) How the effluent will be contained;
6) How the effluent will be disposed;
7) General information on the companies that will be operating and using the de-icing facility;
8) De-icing fluid inventory control;
9) Reporting plan - for reporting glycol use.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed;
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Belleville, Picton, Ameliasburgh, Point Anne, Deseronto and Napanee and
c) IPZ 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Picton.
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26 of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List E)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall provide a copy of a report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of every year on the action taken by the municipality, for the previous calendar year, if an airport is developed in a zone where airplane de-icing could be a significant threat |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
19-01 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where water taking activities are significant drinking water threats (existing and future activity).
The policy applies to provincial instruments related to water takings, Permits to Take Water.
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall:
1. Review all existing permits;
2. Review all future permit applications;
3. Determine whether the permits contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to ensure that the water taking activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; and
4. Where the Ministry is of the opinion that the terms, conditions and measures contained in a permit are not adequate, make such amendments to the approval so as to ensure that the water taking activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
19-02 |
The Ministry of Environment and Climate Change should consider the need for ongoing maintenance and funding of the Tier 3 Water Budget models. Ongoing
maintenance includes, but is not limited to;
1. Supporting environmental monitoring to address data gaps; and
2. Providing information to improve modelling inputs.
Monitoring policies MP-02 and MP-32 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
19-03 |
The Municipality of Brockton shall develop and implement a water management plan using the Tier 3 water budget findings and any other available data to ensure that consumptive demand does not become a significant drinking water threat.
The plan shall address;
1. Issues with water supply;
2. Future development;
3. New water supply options; and
4. Water conservation.
The municipal Official Plan must be updated or amended with the water management plan. The update or amendment to the Official Plan must be initiated within three years and completed within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-21 applies |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
19-04 |
The Municipality of Brockton shall give due consideration to collaborating with other agencies for, but not limited to, the following purposes;
- Incentive/financial assistance programs;
- Education programs/materials;
- Scientific research;
- Policy implementation; and
- Communication with the public.
Monitoring policy MP-19 applies.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2-1-E&F |
Each municipality within the Source Protection Planning area where an existing or future onsite sewage system is or could be a significant drinking water threat, and where municipal services are available, shall require connection to the municipal system.
For existing onsite sewage systems the municipality shall require the landowner to connect into the municipal sewage system and decommission the existing onsite sewage system.
Where there is no capacity in the municipal services (waste water system), private onsite sewage systems shall be managed in the interim according to (Policy 2-2-E) or a prescribed instrument (Policy 2-4-E & F) until reserve capacity is available.
For future onsite sewage systems, where municipal services are not available, Policy 2-3-F will apply.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed and
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Picton, Point Anne and Ameliasburgh.
c) Issues Contributing Area - Madoc
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26(1)(iv) of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List E)
Effective Date: Within two years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall prepare a report for the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year, summarizing for the previous calendar year, the following:
a) How this policy was implemented including copies of bylaws;
b) Number of services connected to the municipal system;
c) Decommissioning of septic systems;
d) The number of septic systems remaining to be connected to the municipal system. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2-2-E |
In areas where existing private onsite sewage systems are identified as significant drinking water threats, the municipality is required by the Ontario Building Code to implement a mandatory inspection program. The municipality shall:
1) Follow the 'On-Site Sewage Maintenance Inspection' document dated March, 2011 as amended from time to time, developed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, to ensure a consistent approach to inspecting onsite systems across the province;
2) Prioritize the inspections based on location, age of septic systems and other factors which would result in identifying systems that may need to be improved.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed and
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Picton, Point Anne and Ameliasburgh.
c) Issues Contributing Area - Madoc
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26(1)(iv) of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List E)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect and in accordance with the Ontario Building Code.
Note: The Ontario Building Code allows municipalities to start inspections upon approval of an Assessment Report. The Quinte Region Assessment Report was approved on April 5th, 2011. Each septic system in these zones must be inspected every five years.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall prepare a report for the previous calendar year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year summarizing:
a) The number of inspections conducted;
b) The number and location of septic systems identified as non-compliant using the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing On-Site Sewage Management Inspection protocol;
c) A description of any identified deficiencies in the private sewage systems, and the compliance and enforcement action taken to achieve compliance. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2-3-F |
The municipality shall prohibit or discourage development based on future private onsite sewage systems where they would be significant drinking water threats. To accomplish this each municipality shall:
1) Review its Official Plan in consultation with the Source Protection Authority for its appropriateness and completeness of dealing with the development of land holdings with sewage systems in areas where they would be significant drinking water threats;
2) Following the review of 1) above, prepare a draft official plan amendment (or include within five year update of same) that will include policies and mapping to discourage the development of new septic systems in these areas;
3) Review its comprehensive zoning by-law with the Source Protection Authority for its appropriateness and completeness for dealing with the development of land holdings with sewage systems in areas where they would be significant drinking water threats;
4) Following the review of 3) above, prepare a draft zoning by-law amendment (or include as part of an update of the by-law) that will include zone provisions and regulations and mapping to appropriately regulate development in these areas;
5) In cooperation with the Quinte Region Source Protection Authority, assess applications for development in areas where sewage systems would be a significant drinking water threat which may include the requirement of one or more of the following to be prepared by a qualified professional:
Hydrogeological study;
Engineered sewage system design; and
Best management practices and site design.
The municipality shall only approve future development of onsite sewage systems when the above steps demonstrate that a future sewage system can be adequately managed and will not adversely impact the municipal water supply.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed.
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Picton, Point Anne and Ameliasburgh.
c) Issues Contributing Area - Madoc
Tools: Land Use Planning pursuant to the Planning Act and Section 39(1)(a) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall prepare a report for the previous calendar year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year summarizing the following:
a) Documentation on how the policy was implemented;
b) Copies of applications and approvals for new sewage systems. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2-4-E&F |
Where existing and future onsite sewage systems with a design capacity greater than 10,000 litres per day that have or require a Certificate of Approval/Environmental Compliance Approval under the Ontario Water Resources Act and could be a significant threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall complete the following:
Existing Systems
If Policy 2-1-E & F cannot be met, then the Ministry shall:
1) Review and, if required, amend all existing approvals to ensure they contain adequate terms and conditions to address the drinking water threat including an emergency plan in the event of a failure of the system;
2) Review and, if required, amend all existing Approvals to include requirements for onsite monitoring to ensure that the system is functioning as designed and require the proponent to have the system inspected regularly using a standard equal to or greater than the inspection protocols of the 'On-Site Sewage Maintenance Inspection', document dated March 2011 as amended from time to time, developed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
Future Systems
If Policy 2-1-E & F cannot be met and where municipal studies have shown that an onsite sewage system can be supported by the area (Policy 2-3-F), then the Ministry shall:
1) Specify adequate terms and conditions, including an emergency plan in the event of a failure of the system, to ensure that the system does not become a significant drinking water threat;
2) Specify terms and conditions to include requirements for onsite monitoring to ensure that the system is functioning as designed and require the proponent to have the system inspected regularly using a standard equal to or greater than the inspection protocols of the'On-Site Sewage Maintenance Inspection', document dated March 2011 as amended from time to time, developed by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed and
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Picton, Point Anne and Ameliasburgh.
c) Issues Contributing Area - Madoc
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Sections 39 and 43(1) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List C)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 3 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The Ministry of the Environment shall prepare an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection policy and make that report available to the Source Protection Authority by February 1st. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2-5-E |
Where existing sewage infrastructure is a significant drinking water threat the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that the prescribed instrument (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval) include appropriate terms and conditions so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
The director shall consider including conditions within the prescribed instrument to inspect sewage infrastructure to ensure it is functioning as designed and inclusion of an Emergency Plan.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Sanitary Sewer Networks/Pipes:
WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc and Tweed and
IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Picton.
b) Pumping Stations and STP Storage Tanks:
IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or higher) - Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1), Napanee (IPZ 1) and Belleville (IPZ 1).
c) Stormwater Ponds, Effluent Discharges, and By-pass discharges:
IPZ 1, 2 and 3 (vulnerability score of 8 or higher) - Picton (IPZ 1, 2 and 3a), Deseronto (IPZ 1 and 2), Napanee (IPZ 1 and 2) ,Belleville (IPZ 1 and 2) and Bayside (IPZ 1).
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Section 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List C)
Effective Date: Within three years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The Ministry of the Environment shall prepare an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection policy and make that report available to the Source Protection Authority by February 1st. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2-6-F |
Where the establishment of future Sewage Infrastructure would be a significant drinking water threat the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure the Prescribed Instrument includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure it does not become a significant drinking water threat.
The Director shall consider the following:
1) That the proposed activity is not prohibited by Policy 2-8-F;
2) That the design includes requirements for Level 1 (as per the Ministry of the Environment's Stormwater Management and Planning Design Manual, 2003 as amended from time to time) treatment of stormwater prior to infiltration in stormwater management facilities when such a structure is being constructed in the WHPA A or B;
3) That the design includes requirements for 0.5 metre freeboard and emergency spillway to pass peak inflow without overtopping for all stormwater management facilities located in vulnerable areas that would be a significant threat;
4) Including an Emergency Plan;
5) That standby power is available at lift stations in the event of a power failure;
6) That any new sanitary sewer and associated sanitary sewer service to the property line be hydrostatic tested to ensure compliance with Ontario Provincial Standards for Roads and Public Works Section 410.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Sanitary Sewer Networks/Pipes:
WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Madoc and Tweed;
IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Picton, Point Anne and Ameliasburgh; and
Issues Contributing Area - Madoc
b) Pumping Stations and STP Storage Tanks:
WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Madoc and Tweed;
IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 9 or higher) - Picton, Ameliasburgh, Point Anne, Deseronto and Belleville;
IPZ 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or higher) - Picton; and
Issues Contributing Area - Madoc
c) Stormwater Ponds, Effluent Discharges, and By-pass discharges:
WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Madoc and Tweed;
IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 8 or higher) - Picton, Ameliasburgh, Deseronto, Point Anne, Napanee, Belleville and Bayside;
IPZ 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or higher) - Picton;
IPZ 3 (vulnerability score of 8 or higher) - Picton;
WHPA E (vulnerability score of 8.1) - Madoc and Peats Point; and
Issues Contributing Area- Madoc.
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Section 39 of the Clean Water Act,
2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List C)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The Ministry of the Environment shall prepare an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection policy and make that report available to the Source Protection Authority by February 1st. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2-7-E |
For Existing Sewage Infrastructure where there is an existing significant threat the municipality shall:
1) Establish and/or maintain a regular inspection and maintenance program of the sewage infrastructure;
2) Respond to repair or replace any deficiencies noted in the inspection;
3) Review operational guidelines for the system to reduce the risk of bypasses;
4) Immediately contact the operators of the drinking water system if a bypass takes place in the vulnerable area;
5) Upgrade any infrastructure that is deficient or failing to meet effluent targets requirements;
6) Review and, if necessary, update the emergency plan for the system annually;
7) Encourage the separation of any existing combined sewers;
8) Develop and/or continue to implement programs to reduce Inflow/infiltration to the sanitary sewer system and related infrastructure.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Sanitary Sewer Networks/Pipes:
WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc and Tweed
IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Picton and issues contributing area - Madoc
b) Pumping Stations and STP Storage Tanks: IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or higher) - Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1) and Belleville (IPZ 1).
c) Stormwater Ponds, Effluent Discharges, and By-pass discharges: IPZ 1, 2 and 3 (vulnerability score of 8 or higher) - Picton.
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26 of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List E)
Effective Date: Within one year of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
By February 1st of each year the municipality shall provide to the Quinte Source Protection Authority all records of the inspection and maintenance program and report on the measures taken to repair or replace identified deficiencies, during the previous calendar year. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2-8-F |
Sewage Treatment Plants are prohibited in the vulnerable areas where it would be a significant drinking water threat if proposed in the future.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA A and B (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Madoc and Tweed;
b) IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 8 or higher) - Picton, Ameliasburgh, Deseronto, Point Anne, Napanee, Belleville and Bayside;
c) IPZ 2 (vulnerability score of 8 or higher) - Picton, Ameliasburgh, Deseronto, Point Anne, Napanee and Belleville;
d) IPZ 3 (vulnerability score of 8 or higher) - Picton;
e) WHPA E (vulnerability score of 8.1) - Madoc and Peats Point and
f) issues contributing area - Madoc.
Tools: Land Use Planning pursuant to the Planning Act and Section 39(1)(a) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall provide records for the previous calendar year, of any proposed sewage treatment plants and provide the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year, and include mapping indicating that this proposed plant is now outside the vulnerable area. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.01 |
Land application of untreated septage shall be prohibited so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. Within vulnerable areas where it is or would be a significant threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) process. All ECAs issued following the effective date of the Source Protection Plan shall incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, would prohibit this future activity where it is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.02 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the land application of untreated septage in vulnerable areas where such activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should consider source protection information as a criterion when setting inspection targets and priorities. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.03 |
The storage, treatment or discharge of tailings from mining operations shall be prohibited so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. This policy shall apply in areas where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat.
Where this activity is subject to Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA), the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall be consistent with this policy by prohibiting this activity through existing and future ECAs.
Further, this activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act (prohibition). |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.04 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from existing waste disposal sites, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be managed so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
In these areas and where the activity is subject to Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECAs), the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall review and, if necessary, amend existing ECAs to comply with this policy.
Where any aspect of a waste disposal site is a significant drinking water threat and is not subject to an ECA, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.05 |
With the exception of the following waste disposal site threat subcategories:
storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste; or
storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste,
where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat future waste disposal sites shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act so that so that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking
Where this activity is subject to Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECAs), the Province (Ministry of Environment (MOE)) shall prohibit this activity through the ECAs. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.05.1 |
Where a future waste disposal site does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval and comprises one of the following waste disposal site threat subcategories:
storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste; or
storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste,and where such a waste disposal site would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that
it never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The requirements of the risk management plan may be based on Ministry of the Environment tools and requirements for such activities, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.06 |
The Province should consider waiving application fees in instances where Prescribed Instruments (PIs) are required to be amended for the sole reason of satisfying the policies in this Plan. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.07 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from existing stormwater management facilities in vulnerable areas where the discharge of stormwater is a significant threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage this activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. This review should also consider the impact of snow melt water and road salt on drinking water where the handling and storage of road salt and storage of snow are significant drinking water threats. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.08 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from future stormwater management facilities that would be a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) process so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.09 |
For any existing or new sanitary sewer and related pipes, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) for these activities are prepared, or, where necessary, amended to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat. The terms and conditions may include, but not necessarily be limited to, requirements for regular maintenance and inspections by the holder of the ECA. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.10 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from existing:
sewage treatment effluent discharge;
sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge; or
combined sewer discharge
where the discharge is a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall review and, where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage this activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.11 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from future:
sewage treatment effluent discharge;
sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge; or
combined sewer discharge
where the discharge would be a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) process so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.12 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from existing sewage storage in vulnerable areas where it is a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall review and, where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage this activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.13 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from future sewage storage where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.13.1 |
For a new septic system or septic system holding tank requiring an Environmental Compliance Approval, that is located within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score of 10, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit these activities through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process so that they never become significant drinking water threats. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.14 |
For existing septic systems or septic system holding tanks (including expansions, modifications or replacements) subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA), that are a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall review and, where necessary, amend the ECA to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage this activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. The terms and conditions may include, but not necessarily be limited to:
mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts;
contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected;
regular and ongoing compliance monitoring;
mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years; and
annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority on any required inspection or monitoring programs;
upgrading these septic systems to current standards, where necessary. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.15 |
For new septic systems or new septic system holding tanks, with the exception of:
those required for a municipal water supply well;
where these activities would be a significant drinking water threat, Municipalities shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to prohibit uses, buildings or structures that would require a new septic system or septic system holding tank to be located within the above noted significant drinking water threat areas so that these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.16 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from septic systems or septic system holding tanks in areas where this activity would be a significant threat, municipalities shall consider enacting and enforcing by-laws to require mandatory hook-up to municipal sanitary sewer services and decommissioning of septic systems or holding tanks, where municipal sanitary sewer services exist and where permitted by the servicing policies in the Official Plan. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.17 |
For septic systems or septic system holding tanks regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act, where such systems are:
existing (including modifications or replacements); or
new and required for a municipal supply well;
and where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the Municipalities shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required by the Ontario Building Code Act so that these activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.18 |
For septic systems or septic system holding tanks subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA), that are a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should develop a compliance monitoring program. The compliance monitoring should include inspection of the system to ensure that it:
continues to function as designed;
meets applicable design standards; and
is being properly maintained.
Priorities for the compliance monitoring program should include areas where known septic failures have been identified and areas where older systems have not recently been inspected. Systems found to be deficient are required to undertake improvements to be in compliance.
Where the system is subject to a mandatory inspection as per conditions on the ECA as outlined in policy 2.14, the compliance monitoring program may consider a certificate produced by a qualified person as proof that the system has been inspected and is properly functioning. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.19 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from existing industrial effluent discharges within those areas where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall review and, where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, will manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.20 |
Future industrial effluent discharges shall be prohibited so that this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. The Province (Ministry of Environment), through the Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECA) process shall prohibit this activity in vulnerable areas where it would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.21 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the application of agricultural source material (ASM), this activity shall be managed where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. Nutrient Management Act principles (including NMA prohibitions) shall form the basis of the Risk Management Plan provided the Risk Management Official is satisfied these principles adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Any Prescribed Instrument related to the Application of ASM that is created, amended, or used as part of a notice for the purpose of a Section 61 exemption, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions. This review is expected to include Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.21.1 |
<div>To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the application of agricultural source material (ASM), this activity shall be managed where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat.</div><div>
</div><div>This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. The Risk Management Official must be satisfied that the Risk Management Plan will adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.</div><div>
</div><div>Any Prescribed Instrument related to the Application of ASM that is created, amended, or used as part of a notice for the purpose of a Section 61 exemption, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review Prescribed Instruments that it issues under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions. </div><div>
</div><div>Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07.</div> |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.22 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the storage of agricultural source material (ASM) where ASM is or would be stored in a nutrient storage facility as defined under the Nutrient Management Act (NMA), this activity shall be managed where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. NMA principles (including NMA prohibitions) shall form the basis of the Risk Management Plan provided the Risk Management Official is satisfied these principles adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The Risk Management Plan shall not allow at or above grade temporary field nutrient storage sites as defined under the NMA.
Any Prescribed Instrument related to the Storage of ASM that is created, amended, or used as part of a notice for the purpose of a Section 61 exemption, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions. This review is expected to include Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.23 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the application of non-agricultural source material (NASM), this activity shall be prohibited where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act so that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Any Prescribed Instruments related to the Application of NASM that is created, or amended shall be consistent with this policy. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.24 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material (NASM) where NASM is stored in an existing nutrient storage facility as defined under the Nutrient Management Act (NMA), this activity shall be managed where it is a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. NMA principles (including NMA prohibitions) shall form the basis of the Risk Management Plan, provided the Risk Management Official is satisfied these principles adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
The Risk Management Plan shall not allow at or above grade temporary field nutrient storage sites as defined under the NMA.
Any Prescribed Instrument related to existing NASM Storage amended, or used as part of a notice for the purpose of a Section 61 exemption, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions. This review is expected to include Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.25 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the future handling and storage of non-agricultural source material (NASM) where NASM would be stored in a nutrient storage facility as defined under the Nutrient Management Act (NMA), this activity shall be prohibited where it would be a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Any Prescribed Instrument related to future NASM Storage that is created shall be consistent with this policy. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.26 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the application of commercial fertilizer, this activity shall be managed where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. Nutrient Management Act principles (including NMA prohibitions) shall form the basis of the Risk Management Plan, provided the Risk Management Official is satisfied these principles adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Any Prescribed Instrument related to the Application of Commercial fertilizer that is created, amended, or used as part of a notice for the purpose of a Section 61 exemption, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions. This review is expected to include Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.27 |
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer stored at existing facilities where it is sold or used for application at other sites, shall be managed so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. The activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where this activity is a significant drinking water threat. The Risk Management Plan shall not allow temporary storage of commercial fertilizers. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.28 |
The future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer that would be stored at facilities where it would be sold or used shall be prohibited so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. This activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited where it would be a significant drinking water threat. This policy shall not be applied to areas identified through event-based modelling. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.29 |
The handling and storage of nitrogen based commercial fertilizer, in event modeled quantities, shall be managed so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. The Risk Management Plan shall not allow temporary storage of nitrogen based commercial fertilizers. This policy shall apply in event modelled quantities in intake protection zone areas where event-based modelling has identified the activity as a significant threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.30 |
The application of pesticides to land shall be managed so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. This policy shall apply to pesticides identified within the Provincial Drinking Water Threats Tables, in areas where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat. Pesticide application shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
Further, all Pesticide Permits issued under the Pesticide Act (existing and new) shall prohibit the use of pesticides which would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.31 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the land application of pesticides, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should consider compliance monitoring (including inspection). This compliance monitoring should be considered for Pesticide Permits issued under the Pesticide Act, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The Ministry of Environment should consider source protection information as a criterion when setting inspection targets and priorities. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.32 |
The handling and storage of pesticides, where pesticides are stored at a facility for retail sale or use, shall be managed so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The Risk Management Plan shall not allow temporary storage of pesticides. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.33 |
The future handling and storage of pesticides at a facility where they are manufactured, distributed or processed shall be prohibited so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited where it would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.34 |
Existing handling and storage of pesticides at a facility where they are manufactured, distributed or processed shall be managed so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.35 |
The handling and storage of road salt in any form (solid, liquid, mixed with sand and including for the use as a dust suppressant) shall be prohibited so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
In areas where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall also be prohibited through the Aggregate Resources Act (ARA) by prohibiting road salt stored in sites licensed or permitted under the ARA. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.36 |
The storage of snow on-site shall be managed so that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The Risk Management Plan shall prohibit snow transported to the storage area from off site and may include other such measures or requirements as are deemed necessary by the Risk Management Official. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.37 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the storage of snow in aggregate operations, the Province (Ministry of Natural Resources) shall include conditions on Aggregate Permits and site plan approvals under the Aggregate Resources Act. Where it could be a significant drinking water threat (existing), site plans should be reviewed to ensure that they are consistent with Aggregate Resources Policy A.R.5.00.14; and where it would be a significant drinking water threat (future), that Aggregate Resources Policy A.R.5.00.14 continue to apply for the approval of future sites. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.38 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the existing handling and storage of fuel, this activity shall be managed where it is a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. The Risk Management Official must be satisfied that the Risk Management Plan will adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. Where, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, a future expansion of a facility handling and storing fuel is of such size that it cannot be managed, the Risk Management Plan may restrict the size so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
This policy shall not apply to the storage of fuel for use in back-up generators for Water Works. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.39 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the handling and storage of fuel, in event modelled quantities, this activity shall be managed where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. This policy shall apply to event modelled quantities in event based areas where modelling has identified the activity as a significant drinking water threat. The Risk Management Official must be satisfied that the Risk Management Plan will adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. Where, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, a future expansion of a facility handling or storing fuel is of such size that it cannot be managed, the Risk Management Plan may restrict the size so that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The Risk Management Plan may include but is not limited to:
details concerning how to contain fuel;
the location of fuel;
how fuel is stored.
This policy shall not apply to the storage of fuel for use in back-up generators for Water Works. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.40 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the future handling and storage of fuel this activity shall be prohibited where it would be a significant drinking water threat.
This activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
This policy shall not apply to the storage of fuel for use in back-up generators for Water Works. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.41 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the handling and storage of fuel where fuel storage is associated with aggregate operations, this activity shall be managed where it is a significant drinking water threat.
The Province (Ministry of Natural Resources) shall create, review and, where necessary, amend any required site plans to adequately manage the activity. These site plans shall incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage this activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The terms and conditions may include, but not necessarily be limited to:
- relocation of this activity to an area where the activity is not a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.42 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the handling and storage of fuel for use in back-up generators for Water Works, this activity shall be managed where it is or would be a significant threat.
The Province (Ministry of Environment) shall create, review and, where necessary, amend any required approvals, licenses or permits to adequately manage the activity such that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. These approvals, licenses or permits shall incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage the activity such that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The terms and conditions may include, but not necessarily be limited to:
require the use of double-walled tanks;
secondary containment;
regular inspection of fuel tanks and fuel handling equipment. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.43 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from fuel storage tanks located on abandoned properties where the storage of fuel is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall consider undertaking the removal of fuel storage tanks when they become aware of them. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.44 |
Existing handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs), through all phases of its life cycle including disposal, shall be managed so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where this activity is a significant drinking water threat and, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, substantial quantities and concentrations not typical of household use are being handled or stored. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.45 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids in concentrations typical of household use, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, municipalities, in collaboration with the Conservation Authority, the Ministry of Environment, and/or wherever possible other bodies, shall develop and implement an education and outreach program directed at the owners and/or occupants of such properties.
The program may include, but not necessarily be limited to, the provision of education material and information about the nature of the threat, how DNAPLs can be identified and handled and disposed of in a manner so that the activity would cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat. This policy shall be initiated within one (1) year of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.46 |
Future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs), through all phases of its life cycle including disposal, shall be managed so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, substantial quantities and concentrations not typical of household use would be handled or stored, and where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat other than in Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A or B with a vulnerability score of 10. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.47 |
Future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs), through all phases of its life cycle including disposal, shall be prohibited so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited where, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, substantial quantities and concentrations not typical of household use would be handled and stored, and where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat in Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A and B with a vulnerability score of 10. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.48 |
Existing handling and storage of organic solvents, through all phases of its life cycle including disposal, shall be managed so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. Under circumstances identified within the Provincial Drinking Water Threats Tables, in areas where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.49 |
Future handling and storage of organic solvents, through all phases of its life cycle including disposal, shall be prohibited so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. Under circumstances identified within the Provincial Drinking Water Threats Tables, in areas where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.50 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft, this activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Municipalities, through the Risk Management Official, shall work collaboratively with relevant airport authorities or operators to encourage the development of a Risk Management Plan where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The Risk Management Plan shall ensure glycol management plans are up-to-date, implemented and effective in managing the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.51 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the existing or future use of land for livestock grazing, pasturing, an outdoor confinement area, or a farm-animal yard, these activities shall be managed where they are a significant drinking water threat.
These activities shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. Nutrient Management Act principles (including NMA prohibitions) shall form the basis of the Risk Management Plan provided the Risk Management Official is satisfied these principles adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Where, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, a future livestock grazing land, pasture land, outdoor confinement area, or farm-animal yard is of such size that it cannot be managed, the Risk Management Plan may restrict the size so that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Any Prescribed Instrument related ASM Generation Through Livestock Grazing or Pasturing Land, an Outdoor Confinement Area or a Farm Animal Yard that is created, amended, or used as part of a notice for the purpose of a Section 61 exemption, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions. This review is expected to include Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
2.51.1 |
The use of land for livestock grazing, pasturing, an outdoor confinement area, or a farm-animal yard shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act so that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat in the St. Marys Wellhead Protection Area only. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.52 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from activities that are regulated under the Nutrient Management Act, where such activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Province, through the Ministry of Environment Agricultural Officer, should consider source protection information as a criterion when setting inspection targets and priorities as part of the Ministry's on-farm compliance program. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.53 |
The transportation of fuel and nitrogen based fertilizer along provincial highways, county and local roads, railways, waterways and the transportation of liquid petroleum products through pipelines have been identified as a local threat in the Assessment Reports. Event based modelling has identified these activities as significant drinking water threats within specified parts of IPZ-1, 2 and 3. In these areas, municipalities shall consider:
a) rerouting, where possible, highways and arterial roads around more vulnerable areas where opportunities arise;
b) placing road signs, consistent with policies 1.02 and 1.03, at the entrance to IPZs so emergency responders and those engaged in transportation of these materials are aware that a spill may pose a significant risk to the drinking water source;
c) reviewing their emergency response programs with regards to the ability to contain chemical spills; and
d) reviewing their water treatment plant response time, procedures and equipment. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
2.54 |
The transportation of fuel and nitrogen based fertilizer along provincial highways, county and local roads, railways, waterways and the transportation of liquid petroleum products through pipelines have been identified as local threats in some IPZ-1, 2 and 3s where event based modelling has been undertaken. Where these local threats have been identified as significant drinking water threats in the Assessment Report, the Province (Ministry of Transportation) in consultation with municipalities and relevant police services, shall consider source protection information as a criterion when establishing and reviewing Emergency Detour Routes. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
21-01 |
The policy applies in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The expansion of an existing outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard beyond the number of square metres existing as of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan shall be prohibited.
The establishment of a new outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard shall be prohibited.
Therefore, the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard is designated for the purposes of s.57 of the Clean Water Act.
Monitoring policy MP-23 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
21-02 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan. Therefore, the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
The Risk Management Plan shall satisfy the following provisions:
The Risk Management Plan shall be based on appropriate agricultural best management practices.
The Risk Management Plan shall contain measures that will prevent farm animals from accessing land that lies within three metres of the top of bank of a watercourse. A reasonable allowance can be made to provide a stream crossing where necessary.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
21-03 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity), except for:
the expansion of an existing outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard within WHPA-A (future activity); or
the establishment of a new outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard within WHPA-A (future activity).
The use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard may only occur in accordance with an approved Risk Management Plan:
for existing facilities (existing activity); or
for the expansion of an existing facility (future activity); or
for the establishment of a new facility (future activity).
Establishment of a Risk Management Plan is required. Therefore, the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard is designated for the purposes of s.58 of the Clean Water Act.
The plan shall meet the guidelines with respect to the contents of a nutrient management strategy established under Part III of O.Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act.
It is recommended that NMAN software or similar be utilized to assist in calculations. The calculations shall be reviewed annually and the Risk Management Plan updated so that it accurately reflects the anticipated operation on the farm unit during the following year.
The Risk Management Plan shall be renewed every five years or at the discretion of the Risk Management Official.
For properties where the person engaging in the activity has, or intends to obtain, a nutrient management strategy approval as per the Nutrient Management Act, the person engaging in the activity may be deemed to be exempt from the requirement for a Risk Management Plan if the process described in O.Reg. 287/07, s. 61, is followed.
All locations for Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be inventoried within three years and plans established with five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-24 and MP-25 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
21-04 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
The policy applies to the following provincial instruments:
- nutrient management strategies under the Nutrient Management Act
A nutrient management strategy shall satisfy the following provisions:
1. The nutrient management strategy shall not permit the expansion of an existing outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard beyond the number of square metres existing as of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity); and
2. The nutrient management strategy shall not permit the establishment of a new outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard in all WHPA-A vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat (future activity).
The Ministry of the Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall:
A. review all existing nutrient management strategies in all vulnerable areas where the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity); and
B. determine whether the approvals as described in clause (A) contain appropriate terms and conditions and require adequate measures to be in place to satisfy clauses (1) and (2) above; and
C. where the Ministry is of the opinion that the terms, conditions and measures contained in an approval as described in clause (B) are not adequate, cause such amendments to be made to the nutrient management strategy so as to satisfy clauses (1) and (2) above.
Existing approvals shall be reviewed within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. Where amendments are deemed necessary, the existing approval shall be amended within 12 months of the review.
Monitoring policies MP-07 and MP-08 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
3-1-E&F |
The following existing and future agricultural activities located in the WHPA A that could be significant drinking water threats are prohibited and are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act:
The application of agricultural source material (ASM);
The handling and storage of agricultural source material;
The application of non agricultural source material (NASM) (including treated septage);
The handling and storage of non agricultural source material (including treated septage);
The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
The storage of commercial fertilizer;
The application of pesticides to land;
The handling and storage of pesticides;
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Peats Point, Point Anne and Tweed.
Tools: Prohibition pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
3-2-E&F |
The following existing and future agricultural activities in IPZs and WHPAs (other than WHPA A) where they could be significant drinking water threats require a risk management plan and are therefore designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006:
The application of agricultural source material (ASM);
The handling and storage of agricultural source material;
The application of non agricultural source material (NASM) (including treated septage);
The handling and storage of non agricultural source material (including treated septage);
The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
The storage of commercial fertilizer;
The application of pesticides to land;
The handling and storage of pesticides;
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
The risk management official must establish a risk management plan for agricultural operations in the applicable areas. The risk management plan shall include, as a minimum:
1) Existing risk management measures that may already be in place. Such measures include an environmental farm plan, nutrient management plan, strategy, or other existing risk reduction measures in place to manage the activity;
2) Consideration of existing Nutrient Management Act, 2002 standards and recognized environmental agricultural practices;
3) The risk management measures most suitable to reduce the risk posed by the activity;
4) The timing of plan implementation;
5) Consideration of environmental features and the location of the following:
Vulnerable areas,
Watercourses,
Surface and subsurface drains including tile drainage and catch basins,
Water wells (both used and unused),
Livestock confinement areas,
Storage (permanent and temporary) for both agricultural and non agricultural source material,
Maintenance facilities including pesticide, fertilizer, chemical and fuel storages,
Areas for the application of pesticides, commercial fertilizers, agricultural source material and non agricultural source material;
6) Setbacks from surface water for application of ASM within IPZs and WHPA E. These setbacks are to be established in reference to requirements of the Nutrient Management Act, 2002, Best Management Practices and site conditions (e.g. land slope, soil permeability and crop type, application method and vegetated buffers);
7) Protocols and emergency response plans to be followed in the event of a spill of fuel, ASM, NASM, chemicals or pesticides, and any other measures necessary to reduce the risk of a release to the environment;
8) Monitoring and reporting requirements;
9) A procedure to address any change of activities or operations on the property that would warrant an update or change in the risk management plan;
10) An appropriate inspection cycle to monitor compliance with and effectiveness of the risk management plan; and
11) A provision in reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating that the risk management plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Application of ASM, Storage of ASM, Application of NASM, Handling and Storage of NASM, livestock grazing, pasturing, outdoor confinement:
WHPA B, E and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 8 or greater) - Deloro (WHPA B), Madoc (WHPA B and E), Peats Point (WHPA B and E), Point Anne (WHPA B and IPZ 1 and 2), Tweed (WHPA B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1 and 2), Belleville (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1 and 2), Napanee (IPZ 1 and 2) and Bayside (IPZ 1) and
c) issues contributing area - Madoc
b) Application of Pesticide to Land:
WHPA B, E and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 8.1 or greater) - Deloro (WHPA B), Madoc (WHPA B and E), Peats Point (WHPA B and E), Point Anne (WHPA B and IPZ 1), Tweed (WHPA B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Belleville (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1 and 2) and Napanee (IPZ 1 and 2).
c) Handling and Storage of Pesticide:
WHPA B and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) -
Deloro (WHPA B), Madoc (WHPA B), Peats Point (WHPA B), Point Anne (WHPA B and IPZ 1), Tweed (WHPA B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Belleville (IPZ 1), Deseronto (IPZ 1) and Napanee (IPZ 1).
d) Application of Commercial Fertilizer to Land:
WHPA B and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) -
Deloro (WHPA B), Madoc (WHPA B), Peats Point (WHPA B), Point Anne (WHPA B and IPZ 1), Tweed (WHPA B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Belleville (IPZ 1), Deseronto (IPZ 1) and Napanee (IPZ 1).
e) Handling and Storage of Commercial Fertilizer:
WHPA B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) -
Deloro (WHPA B), Madoc (WHPA B), Peats Point (WHPA B), Point Anne (WHPA B and IPZ 1), Tweed (WHPA B), Picton (IPZ 1) and Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1).
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within three years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
3-3-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where agricultural activities are prohibited (Policy 3-1-E & F) or require risk management plans (Policy 3-2-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Application of Agricultural Source Material (ASM), Storage of ASM, Application of Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM), Handling and Storage of NASM, livestock grazing, pasturing, outdoor confinement:
WHPA A, B, E and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 8 or greater) - Deloro (WHPA A and B), Madoc (WHPA A, B and E), Peats Point (WHPA A, B and E), Point Anne (WHPA A and B and IPZ 1 and 2), Tweed (WHPA A and B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1 and 2), Belleville (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1 and 2), Napanee (IPZ 1 and 2) and Bayside (IPZ 1) and
issues contributing area - Madoc.
b) Application of Pesticide to Land:
WHPA A, B, E and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 8.1 or greater) - Deloro (WHPA A and B), Madoc (WHPA A, B and E), Peats Point (WHPA A, B and E), Point Anne (WHPA A and B and IPZ 1), Tweed (WHPA A and B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Belleville (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1 and 2) and Napanee (IPZ 1 and 2).
c) Handling and Storage of Pesticide:
WHPA A, B and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) -
Deloro (WHPA A and B), Madoc (WHPA A and B), Peats Point (WHPA A and B), Point Anne (WHPA A and B and IPZ 1), Tweed (WHPA A and B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Belleville (IPZ 1), Deseronto (IPZ 1) and Napanee (IPZ 1).
d) Application of Commercial Fertilizer to Land:
WHPA A and B and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) -
Deloro (WHPA A and B), Madoc (WHPA A and B), Peats Point (WHPA A and B), Point Anne (WHPA A and B and IPZ 1), Tweed (WHPA A and B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Belleville (IPZ 1), Deseronto (IPZ 1) and Napanee (IPZ 1).
e) Handling and Storage of Commercial Fertilizer:
WHPA A and B and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) -
Deloro (WHPA A and B), Madoc (WHPA A and B), Peats Point (WHPA A and B), Point Anne (WHPA A and B and IPZ 1), Tweed (WHPA A and B), Picton (IPZ 1) and Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1).
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken in the previous year to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
3-4-E&F |
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall issue new or review and update existing Instruments for areas where existing and future agricultural activities could be a significant drinking water threat. Instruments shall contain terms and conditions to manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. Additional measures could include implementation of best management practices, increased monitoring,
and inspection frequency by the Ministry of the Environment.
Implementer: Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
Application of ASM, Storage of ASM, Application of NASM, Handling and Storage of NASM, livestock grazing, pasturing, outdoor confinement: WHPA A, B, E and IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 8 or greater) – Deloro (WHPA A and B), Madoc (WHPA A, B and E), Peats Point (WHPA A, B and E), Point Anne (WHPA A and B and IPZ 1 and 2), Tweed (WHPA A and B), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1 and 2), Belleville (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1 and 2), Napanee (IPZ 1 and 2) and Bayside (IPZ 1) and Issues Contributing Area – Madoc.
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Sections 39(7) and 43(1) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List C)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within two years for existing activities. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
3.01 |
To reduce the risk to drinking water sources from septic systems or septic system holding tanks in vulnerable areas where this activity is a low or moderate threat, the local approval agency of septic systems, under the authority of the Ontario Building Code (municipalities or the Board of Health), should consider including these septic systems as part of the discretionary maintenance inspection program outlined in O. Reg. 315/10. In considering these discretionary inspections, priority should be given to areas where septic systems are known to fail and where older septic systems are predominant. Further, special consideration should also be given to maintenance inspection of septic systems which are moderate or low drinking water threats in vulnerable areas where nitrate or phosphorous discharged from septic systems may contribute to identified issues. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Low, Moderate |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
3.02 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the land application of pesticides, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should consider reviewing and, if necessary, amending Pesticide Permits issued under the Pesticides Act, to incorporate conditions to address the protection of municipal drinking water sources where this activity is or would be a low or moderate drinking water threat. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Low, Moderate |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
3.03 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from new activities that would be:
- subject to one or more Prescribed Instruments; and,
- located in areas where the activity would be a moderate or low drinking water threat;
the province should consider incorporating terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, should manage the activity such that it does not become a Significant Drinking Water Threat. Where appropriate these terms and conditions should reduce the risk. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Low, Moderate |
Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
4.01 |
To ensure spill prevention plans, spill contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting municipal drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur along highways, or railway lines within WHPAs and IPZs, municipalities should consider incorporating the location of WHPAs and IPZs and related spill considerations into their emergency response plans. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.02 |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting municipal drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a vulnerable area, along highways, or railway lines;
a. The Ministry of Environment is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to the Spills Action Centre to assist them in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
b. The Spills Action Centre Operations and the relevant procedures cards include information on vulnerable areas and contacts for municipal water system operators with the expectation that the Spills Action Centre will take action under the circumstances to ensure that the operator is aware of the spill and the potential for impact on the drinking water system. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.03 |
The Province (Ministry of Environment), in collaboration with municipalities, shall consider developing and implementing general spills awareness programs where significant threats may occur. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.04 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from transport pathways located within vulnerable areas, the Province (Ministry of Environment) shall consider placing a greater focus on the enforcement of standards and requirements for wells to be installed by licensed installers and decommissioned according to applicable standards by qualified individuals. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.05 |
To reduce the potential for transport pathways to increase the risk to municipal drinking water sources, municipalities should consider:
a) including, as a condition for approval on relevant development applications, a record of the decommissioning of unused wells in accordance with O. Reg. 903 of the Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA);
b) the development of municipal by-laws to restrict private wells and septic systems where prescribed drinking water threats would be significant and municipal servicing is in place to provide an option for water and sewage other than the creation of potential transport pathways. The municipality, in consultation with the Risk Management Official, shall be responsible for determining exceptions to these by-laws; and
c) encouraging landowners to improve their wells to meet standards including making landowners aware of any financial incentives which may be available to assist them. If the landowner fails to take appropriate action, the Municipality should draw this deficiency to the attention of the Ministry of Environment (MOE) to enforce the standards under O. Reg. 903 of OWRA or other regulation where applicable. In drawing this deficiency to the attention of the MOE, they should indicate that the deficiency is occurring in a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) and therefore may be increasing the risk to a municipal drinking water source. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.06 |
Under Section 27(3) of the Clean Water Act, O. Reg. 287/07, municipalities shall notify the Source Protection Authority (SPA) and the Source Protection Committee (SPC) if a person applies to the municipality for the approval of a proposal to engage in any activity in a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) or Intake Protection Zone (IPZ) that may result in the creation of a new transport pathway or the modification of an existing transport pathway. This notice shall include a description of the proposal, the identity of the person responsible for the proposal, and a description of the approvals that are required to engage in the proposed activity. The notification shall be included as part of the existing planning process where possible and the proponent is required to be provided with a copy of the notification. A summary of all such notifications is required to be included as part of the annual reporting requirements identified in policy 5.01. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.07 |
The Conservation Authorities within the Source Protection Region shall work collaboratively with the municipalities of the Source Protection Region to develop guidance to identify the activities that will create transport pathways and the locations within which municipalities are required to provide notification of such new or altered transport pathways in accordance with Section 27(3) of O. Reg. 287/07 of the Clean Water Act. This guidance shall be available as soon as possible after the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.08 |
The Province (Ministry of Environment) in collaboration with municipalities and Conservation Authorities, shall consider developing a program designed to identify transport pathways within Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) A, B, C and D. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.09 |
When the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the Province (Ministry of Environment) and federal agencies, shall consider developing a notification program to ensure that the Source Protection Authority (SPA) and Source Protection Committee (SPC) are aware of new or changes to existing pathways. For this notification, they shall consider the guidance developed collaboratively by the Conservation Authorities and the municipalities which is suggested in policy 4.07. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.10 |
The Ministry of Environment (MOE) is strongly encouraged to undertake an updated risk-based program analysis of the compliance program associated with the Wells Regulation [R.R.O., 1990 Regulation 903 (Wells) as amended, made under the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O., 1990, c. ). 40].
The program analysis should consider:
Increased MOE field presence with well contractors
Complaint response prioritization where the presence of a transport pathway would endanger sources of municipal drinking water,
Focusing resources in areas where improperly constructed, maintained or abandoned wells may increase the potential threat to municipal drinking water sources. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.11 |
Municipalities should consider the effect of municipal infrastructure and development servicing on the vulnerability of a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) in order to ensure such transport pathways are appropriately managed and/or designed so that they do not increase the risk to municipal drinking water. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.12 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from activities subject to an environmental assessment (EA) in areas where the activity would be a significant, moderate or low drinking water threat the Conservation Authorities (CAs) should:
review EA documentation when circulated by the proponent;
provide available Source Protection information; and
request Source Protection Planning information (including an assessment of risks for the proposed and preferred alternatives) be included in the EA.
Participation in this program by the CAs will be contingent on funding and municipal support of the CA involvement in this program. |
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.14 |
In accordance with Section 22(2)-[7] of the Clean Water Act further monitoring and research of Microcystin is required for the Wheatley and Chatham/South Kent Surface Water Intakes to:
assist in the delineation of the issues contributing area (ICA);
identify activities contributing to the issue (via the release of Phosphorous); and,
assess whether Microcystin LR continues to be an issue.
The Chatham-Kent PUC and Essex Region Conservation Authority, in collaboration with the Province (Ministry of Environment) and other bodies where possible, should continue the support of existing water quality monitoring programs where they relate to the assessment of the Microcystin LR Issue, the delineation of an ICA or the identification of threats contributing to the Issue.
Opportunities to better coordinate monitoring efforts to characterize water quality during events, and areas contributing to the issue under the event, should be considered.
Where it is appropriate, additional water quality monitoring should be incorporated into existing programs or added as new programs.
These monitoring efforts should be directed at such things as, but not limited to: event based water quality monitoring (both blooms and runoff events), correlation between the various monitoring programs (locally and within the western Basin of Lake Erie), and contributions through transport pathways.
Participation in these monitoring programs is dependent on adequate resources (such as funding and staff capacity) being available. |
Lower Thames Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.2.1-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should evaluate the need to expand the Drinking Water Surveillance Program and review the mandate of the program to include monitoring for contaminants originating from the threat activities identified in Assessment Reports. If the program is expanded, the Ministry should seek opportunities to include additional drinking water system owners.
Action to implement this analysis should be initiated within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
The Ministry should include information about this policy in an annual summary of actions taken to achieve outcomes of source protection policies and make it available to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.2.2-NB |
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority should reach out to owners and operators of municipal residential drinking water systems to provide information about the potential benefits of enhancing raw water quality sampling at their systems and work with them to develop a location-appropriate sampling protocol that is based on operator knowledge, and the drinking water issues and prevalent drinking water threats within the wellhead protection area or intake protection zone as identified in the Assessment Report.
The dialogue needed to implement this policy should commence within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.3.1-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should update its spill prevention, spill contingency plans and emergency response plans, including procedure cards, to identify municipal wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones in the Cataraqui Source Protection Area within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
The Ministry should also undertake a program analysis to determine what, if any, procedural changes are required to ensure that drinking water sources will be protected through the Ministry's response to spills in these areas.
In order to monitor the implementation of a. and b., the Ministry should include information about this policy in an annual summary of actions taken to achieve source protection objectives and make it available to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. It is recommended that the summary include information about spills that might have an adverse impact on a source of drinking water in a wellhead protection area or intake protection zone, including a summary of any resulting contamination and the results of any site remediation required. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.3.2-CW |
The City of Kingston, Township of South Frontenac, Frontenac County, Town of Gananoque, Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands, Township of Front of Yonge, United Counties of Leeds and Grenville, Township of Elizabethtown-Kitley and the City of Brockville shall update their respective Emergency Management Plans and/or the appropriate department supplemental plans to identify the location of the Wellhead Protection Area(s) and/or Intake Protection Zone(s) within their jurisdictions, and review and update the procedures to better manage the risk to the drinking water source in the event of an emergency, spill as defined by section 91 of the Environmental Protection Act, or unauthorized discharge where the local transportation-related threat would be significant.
The updates specified in a. must occur within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.3.3-NB |
All municipalities that contain all or part of a Wellhead Protection Area or an Intake Protection Zone should review and update their respective Emergency Management Plans and/or the appropriate department supplemental plans to identify the location of these vulnerable areas within their jurisdictions to better protect the drinking water sources in the event of an emergency, spill as defined by section 91 of the Environmental Protection Act, or unauthorized discharge along highways, railway lines or shipping lanes.
The updates specified in a. should occur within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.4.1-NB |
The Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment and in consultation with Source Protection Authorities, should design a sign to meet the appropriate Provincial standards to identify the locations of wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones.
The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and within Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
The Ministry of Transportation should consider installing and maintaining the signs along Highway 33, where there is provincial jurisdiction, within the A.L. Dafoe, Bath, Fairfield and Sandhurst Shores Intake Protection Zones.
Municipalities would be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the Source Protection Authorities. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within Wellhead Protection Areas or Intake Protection Zones.
The above policy should be implemented within two years of the Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.4.2-CW |
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority shall consider coordinating its targeted efforts, as well as those of local partners, and communicate via Conservation Ontario with those provincial partners, who deliver relevant education and outreach programs so that educational resources are updated to include related drinking water source protection information for use in the wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones where significant drinking water threats can or do occur.
An initial meeting or series of meetings of local and provincial partners should occur within six months of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
The appropriate organization should develop or update programs accordingly within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, and provide the Source Protection Authority with a report describing the actions it has taken to do so.
The Source Protection Authority should prepare a report that includes a description of what steps are being taken to determine the extent to which the program has achieved its objectives, and suggestions to improve the effectiveness of the education and outreach program. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.4.3-NB |
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority should consider coordinating its targeted efforts, as well as those of local partners, and communicate, via Conservation Ontario, with those provincial partners who deliver relevant education and outreach programs so that educational resources are updated to include related drinking water source protection information for use vulnerable areas where moderate or low drinking water threats can or do occur.
Clauses b., c., and d. of policy 4.4.2-CW also apply here. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.4.4-NB |
All municipalities in the Cataraqui Source Protection Area should evaluate their waste management programs and improve them as necessary in order to reduce the impacts of improper disposal of wastes on sources of drinking water within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
The waste management programs should:
encourage landowners, tenants, and small business operators to properly dispose of waste products and
ensure that local hazardous waste collection programs are accessible and convenient, and provide information to encourage the use of non-toxic (green) household products.
If the foregoing is undertaken by the municipality, the municipality should provide the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority with a copy of the program evaluation within 60 days of its completion or after its endorsement by Council, if applicable. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.4.5-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should work with the Ontario Pesticides Education Program Committee to evaluate the need to incorporate drinking water source protection information into the education materials for the Ontario Pesticides Education Program to address the storage, handling and application of pesticides to land during the next program update, or within five years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, whichever comes first.
In order to monitor the implementation of a, the Ministry should include information about this policy in an annual summary of actions taken to achieve implementation of this policy. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.5.1-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should consider extending and expanding the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program to address the most prevalent risks to drinking water in the Province where property owner driven projects would be effective and where local stakeholder input demonstrates need for such a program. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.5.2-NB |
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority in cooperation with local stakeholder groups should consider establishing a local incentive program, within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, that would include funding to off-set the cost of the following activities in the highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas, and in the wellhead protection areas where there are moderate or low drinking water threats:
Making improvements to liquid fuel storage tanks
Replacements and repairs suggested as a result of the on-site sewage system maintenance inspection or other priorities as defined by the implementation bodies
Properly decommissioning (e.g., plugging) unused wells and upgrading wells to resolve sub-standard construction. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.5.3-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should consider developing a province-wide recognition program to officially acknowledge proactive industries and businesses that have made improvements to their properties and practices to protect and conserve the quality and quantity of source water in their communities.
The strategic action outlined in a. should occur within five years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.6.1-NB |
To assist in identifying the best risk management measures and standards to address significant, moderate and low drinking water threats related to on-site sewage systems (i.e. septic systems and holding tanks) locally, the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, the Ministry of the Environment, academic institutions and other stakeholder groups should consider conducting research to determine how effluent from on-site sewage systems is transported and attenuated in fractured bedrock environments. This research is recommended to support the improvement of risk management measures for managing effluent from on-site sewage systems in fractured bedrock environments, whether they occur in wellhead protection areas, intake protection zones, highly vulnerable aquifers or significant groundwater recharge areas.
The research should be completed within ten years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
Research findings should be:
considered by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing in future reviews of the Ontario Building Code
considered by the Ministry of the Environment in future reviews of provincial guidelines for water quality impact assessments for individual onsite sewage systems and
shared with local municipalities and health units for use in their decision-making processes. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.6.2-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, in cooperation with the Ontario Rural Wastewater Centre and the water softener industry, should consider undertaking a research study to determine the most effective method for disposing of water softener backwash in the hydrogeologic and climatic setting of the Cataraqui Source Protection Area/Eastern Ontario to add to the risk management measures available to protect drinking water sources. Discharge from a water softener can be a significant, moderate and low drinking water threat in the wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones in the CSPA.
The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing should use the study results to analyze the need for a review of the Ontario Building Code to specify how water softener backwash should be disposed.
A proposal to undertake this strategic action should occur within five years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, and be shared with the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority at that time. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.7.1-NB |
The Ministry of Transportation and their supporting de-icing contractors should continue the proactive implementation of their salt management plans and to continue the use of best management practices within wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones in the Cataraqui Source Protection Area, where the application, handling and storage of road salt and the storage of snow can be a moderate or low drinking water threat.
The Ministry should continue its on-going investigation and implementation of innovative practices and new mitigative technologies regarding the application of road salt and the management of infiltration and runoff.
The Ministry is requested to actively consider the creation of a pilot project using new practices and mitigative technologies for the application of road salt and/ or the management of runoff that could benefit drinking water sources within the Cataraqui Source Protection Area.
When various parts of this policy are implemented by the Ministry of Transportation, the Ministry should publish related information in a reasonable timeframe in a location that is readily accessible to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.7.2-NB |
All municipal road authorities in the Cataraqui Source Protection Area should review and update the salt management plans applicable to their respective jurisdictions to account for the sensitivity of the vulnerable areas within their jurisdictions. The updated plans should take into consideration the level of risk that the salt operations (i.e., application, handling and storage) and snow storage pose to the source water where these activities are moderate or low drinking water threats.
The Township of Frontenac Islands, Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands, and Township of South Frontenac should each establish a salt management plan, as per a.The plan should be consistent with the Environment Canada Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salts, as amended from time to time, and the Transport Association of Canada Salt Management Guide and Synthesis of Best Practices for Road Salt Management, as amended from time to time.
The establishment or update of the salt management plans should occur within three years of the Code of Practice being updated. If the foregoing is undertaken by the municipal road authority, a copy of the plan must be provided to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority within 60 days of its completion or after its endorsement by Council, if applicable. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.7.3-NB |
Where the application of untreated septage (i.e. hauled sewage) to land, sewage treatment plant effluent discharges and on-site sewage treatment systems (i.e. septic systems and holding tanks) are moderate or low drinking water threats, and there is limited or no capacity at local wastewater treatment facilities in the Cataraqui Source Protection Area, municipalities should consider taking the following actions to protect their sources of drinking water within five years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect:
managing the treatment or stabilization of untreated septage at existing wastewater facilities and/or
upgrading existing or constructing new facilities to handle demand and/or
encouraging the use of alternative treatment or stabilization technologies.
Where this policy is implemented by a municipality, the municipality should provide the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority with a timely update. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.7.4-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should review the Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual (2003) to determine how it could be improved to provide a greater level of protection to groundwater from the discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond, especially in wellhead protection areas, highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas.
The strategic action outlined in a. should be implemented at the next review of the design manual or within five years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, whichever comes first.
In order to monitor the implementation of a, the Ministry should include information about implementation of this policy in an annual summary of actions to achieve outcomes of source protection policies and make it available to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.7.5-NB |
Where the handling and storage of fuel at facilities defined in Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 213/01 or Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 217/01 is or would be a drinking water threat, the Ministry of Consumer Services and the Ministry of the Environment should consider source water protection during the next scheduled code review in part by considering changes such as the use of fuel handling and storage equipment (i.e. supply tanks, supply lines, etc.) that research has shown to be resistant to leaks.
The Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Consumer Services should include information about this policy in an annual summary of actions taken to achieve the outcomes of source protection policies and make it available to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.7.6-NB |
a. Where the handling and storage of fuel at facilities as defined in Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 213/01 or Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 217/01 is or would be a significant, moderate or low drinking water threat, the Ministry of Consumer Services and the Ministry of the Environment should consider the following changes such as:
i. An increase in the frequency of inspections conducted by fuel suppliers to ensure compliance with Ontario Regulation 213/01 and the Ontario Installation Code for Oil Burning Equipment.
ii. An increase in the frequency of inspections for licensed facilities to ensure compliance with Ontario Regulation 217/01 and the Liquid Fuels Handling Code.
iii. Licensing requirements or a registry for currently unlicensed (i.e. private fuel outlets) facilities under Ontario Regulation 217/01.
|
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.7.7-NB |
In instances where the expertise of the Technical Standards and Safety Authority is needed, the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority in cooperation with local risk management officials or municipalities should engage the Technical Standards and Safety Authority by requesting inspection of private fuel outlets where the storage and handling of fuel is a drinking water threat. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
4.7.8-NB |
The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs should consider amending Ontario Regulation 267/03 (General) in the future to apply to all farms in WHPAs and IPZs where the application to land, storage and management of agricultural source materials are significant drinking water threats. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
5-1-F |
The Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Natural Resources should consider the potential impact on drinking water sources prior to issuing approvals for any aquaculture facilities under the Ontario Water Resources Act in the zones where these activities would be a moderate or low threat if established in the future. These approvals should include a decommissioning plan upon closure of the facility.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment and Ministry of Natural Resources
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
Moderate
IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Belleville, Picton,
Ameliasburgh, Point Anne, Deseronto and Napanee and
IPZ 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Picton.
Low
WHPA E (vulnerability score of 8.1) - Madoc and Peats Point.
IPZ 2 (vulnerability score of 8 or 8.1) - Belleville, Point Anne, Deseronto, Napanee and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Prescribed Instrument pursuant to Section 39 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Have Regard To (See Appendix C, List D)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J):
The Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Natural Resources shall provide a report by February 1st of each year, if applications were received, to the Quinte Source Protection Authority on the number of applications and any approvals issued to aquaculture operations in the Quinte Region, for the previous calendar year. |
Quinte |
Low, Moderate |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
5.2.1-NB |
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority should share the following information with municipalities of rural settlement areas that are not currently serviced by municipal water supplies to help them consider how to proactively protect the sources of drinking water for these areas:
- the delineation of vulnerable areas as identified in the Assessment Report
- best management practices for the management of drinking water threats, including designating areas for the protection of drinking water sources in municipal planning documents.
This policy should be implemented within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
5.2.2-NB |
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority should encourage the Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, Kingston, Frontenac, Lennox and Addington (KFL&A) Public Health, and the Leeds, Grenville, Lanark and District Health Unit to develop a protocol to formalize sharing information with each other about the results of private well bacteriological sampling results within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. The Source Protection Authority should also share information gathered for the preparation of the Assessment Report with these agencies.
Any resulting determination of clusters of water quality problems identified by the Health Units should be considered for targeted education and outreach initiatives to inform well owners of best management practices to protect their sources of drinking water. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
5.2.3-NB |
The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, in consultation with the Ministry of the Environment and groundwater focused organizations, should coordinate the delivery of information sessions targeted to municipal councils and staff that would address the importance of protecting groundwater, and provide practical ideas for implementation through land use planning and development.
The information sessions should be offered to all municipalities within the Cataraqui Source Protection Area, and delivered within five years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
5.3.1-NB |
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority, in cooperation with the Ministry of the Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources, KFL&A Public Health, the Leeds, Grenville, Lanark and District Health Unit, local municipalities, and other groups, should coordinate the collection and management of groundwater data in order to be prepared to better gauge the impact of climate change on sources of drinking water within the Cataraqui Source Protection Area.
Such a program should:
establish a means by which databases may be collated, and data shared and
facilitate the identification of gaps in current groundwater monitoring programs.
These bodies should work to establish this program within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
5.3.2-NB |
The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, in cooperation with the Ministry of the Environment, should expand the existing Provincial Groundwater Monitoring Network within the jurisdiction of the Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority to ensure that data on fluctuating water levels for all main bedrock aquifer units in the Cataraqui Source Protection Area is gathered on an on-going basis to assess the impact of climate change in the highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas.
The network should be expanded to include monitoring wells in the following bedrock units and municipalities, as originally included in the monitoring network plan (Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority, 2002):
Gull River Formation: Member D in the City of Kingston
March Formation in the Township of Front of Yonge
Precambrian Shield (coarse-grained) in the Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands
The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority and the Ministry of the Environment should work to expand the network within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
5.4.1-NB |
Municipalities, in consultation with their respective principal authorities under Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code, should consider establishing on-site sewage system maintenance inspection programs consistent with the Ontario Building Code and the inspection guidelines under the Code in areas that are subject to increased risk of groundwater contamination from on-site sewage systems (i.e., septic systems and holding tanks) within the highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas where they are low drinking water threats, as prioritized to reflect local circumstances.
Consideration for establishment of the program described in a. should be done by October 6, 2016 (i.e., five years following the approval of the Assessment Report).
Any resulting program should provide information to landowners about the proper operation and maintenance of their on-site sewage systems, and the benefits of a well maintained system.
If the foregoing is implemented, the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority should be provided notice of any on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, including the applicable area, rationale, and a summary of inspection results, by February 15 of the year following program implementation. |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
5.5.1-HR |
Municipalities reviewing proposals under the Planning Act or Condominium Act for new development and for expansions to existing development located in a highly vulnerable aquifer or significant groundwater recharge area, and involving one or more of the activities listed below, should incorporate measures/management practices to adequately manage the risk to groundwater quality associated with those activities. This policy contains examples of land uses associated with these activities, which are low drinking water threats, and is not considered to be an exhaustive list.
the handling and storage of more than 25 litres of dense non-aqueous-phase liquids (DNAPLs) and/or organic solvents (e.g., metal manufacturing, electroplating and fabrication industries, automotive or equipment repair shops, furniture refinishing shops, dry cleaning establishments)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer and/or more than 250 kilograms or litres of pesticide where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed (e.g., lawn and garden centres, farm supply stores, yard maintenance contractors, golf courses)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel (e.g., gas stations)
the handling and storage of more than 500 tonnes of road salt (e.g., public or private maintenance yards)
at or above-grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare in size (e.g., public or private maintenance yards, snow dumps)
the storage of mine tailings (e.g., mineral extraction sites)
the storage of PCBs (e.g., waste transfer stations)
If there is any evidence of surface karst formations (e.g., disappearing streams, sinkholes, caves, vertical fissures) on the property, the municipality should require the developer to have a karst assessment completed by a karst specialist to determine what, if any, additional risk management measures may be required.
This requirement could be waived if the proponent can demonstrate through a site specific investigation that a property does not exhibit characteristics of a highly vulnerable aquifer and/or significant groundwater recharge area. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
5.5.3-HR |
The Ministry of the Environment, when reviewing applications for the establishment of new waste disposal sites, should incorporate available source protection information in its decision-making process, and require the incorporation of appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water as part of any environmental compliance approval. Waste disposal sites would be moderate or low drinking water threats in the highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
5.5.4-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should prioritize the preparation and implementation of closure plans for waste disposal sites in the highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas where they are moderate or low drinking water threats.
The Ministry of the Environment should include information about this policy in an annual summary of actions taken to achieve outcomes of source protection policies and make it available to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
5.5.5-HR |
The Ministry of the Environment, when reviewing applications for the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage should incorporate available source protection information in its decision-making process, and require the incorporation of appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water as part of any environmental compliance approval.
The action identified in a. applies to the following types of sewage works where they would be low drinking water threats in the highly vulnerable aquifers and significant groundwater recharge areas:
discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond
sanitary sewers and related pipes
septic systems or holding tanks
sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (including lagoons)
storage of sewage (e.g., treatment plant tanks)
Items to consider include enhanced level of quality control for stormwater, strict monitoring requirements and annual reporting. |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
5.5.7-HR |
The Ministry of Natural Resources, through its review of site plans included in applications for licences and permits for new or expanding aggregate extraction, should require terms and conditions be included to reduce the risk of groundwater contamination from a spill or leak associated with the handling and storage of liquid fuel at the site, where this activity would be a low drinking water threat. |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.1-CW |
Municipalities, in consultation with their respective principal authorities, shall develop and implement an education and awareness program for the landowners in WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10 and septic systems and holding tanks are significant drinking water threats.
The program identified in a. should provide information to landowners about the proper operation and maintenance of their on-site sewage systems (i.e. septic systems and holding tanks), and about the benefits of a well maintained system.
This program is to begin before the start of the mandatory on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program that is required by the Ontario Building Code. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.11-CW |
The Ministry of the Environment shall not permit establishment of new waste disposal sites where the following activities would be significant drinking water threats:
In Cana, Lansdowne and Miller Manor WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10:
the application of non-agricultural source material to land
the application of untreated septage (i.e., hauled sewage) to land
landfilling of petroleum refining waste
landfilling of hazardous waste
landfilling of municipal waste
landfilling of solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste
liquid industrial waste injection into a well
In Cana, Lansdowne and Miller Manor WHPA-B and WHPA-C where the vulnerability score is 8:
landfilling of municipal waste
landfilling of solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste
liquid industrial waste injection into a well
This prohibition does not apply to the application of non-agricultural source material to land in Lansdowne WHPA-B provided that the land is suitable for this activity, and any approvals incorporate appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.12-HR |
The Ministry of the Environment (MOE), when reviewing applications for the establishment of new waste disposal sites, should incorporate available source protection information in its decision-making process, and require the incorporation of appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water as part of any environmental compliance approval.
The action identified in a. applies to the following types of waste disposal sites where they would be a moderate or low drinking water threat as identified in the Assessment Report for the Cana, Lansdowne and Miller Manor Wellhead Protection Areas:
the application of non-agricultural source material to land
the application of untreated septage (i.e., hauled sewage) to land
landfarming of petroleum refining waste
landfilling of hazardous municipal and solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste
liquid industrial waste injection into a well. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.13-CW |
The Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit the establishment of new sewage works in Cana, Lansdowne and Miller Manor WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10 for the following activities that would be significant drinking water threats including: sanitary sewers and related pipes (Cana and Lansdowne only), septic systems and holding tanks, sewage treatment plant effluent discharges including lagoons, and storage of sewage.
This prohibition does not apply to the replacement, expansion or upgrade of existing sewage works or facilities provided that the design incorporates appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.14-CW |
The Ministry of the Environment, when reviewing applications for the establishment, operation or maintenance of sanitary sewers and related pipes that would be a significant drinking water threat in Miller Manor WHPA-A and WHPA-B, should require the incorporation of appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water as part of any environmental compliance approval. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.15-CW |
The Ministry of the Environment, when reviewing applications for the establishment of or improvement to on-site sewage systems (i.e. septic systems and holding tanks) where they would be significant drinking water threats in Cana, Lansdowne and Miller Manor WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10 shall incorporate available source protection information in its decision-making process, and require the incorporation of appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water as part of any environmental compliance approval. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.16-HR |
The Ministry of the Environment, when reviewing applications for the establishment of new sanitary sewers and related pipes, or for the establishment of or improvement to wastewater treatment facilities or on-site sewage systems (i.e. septic systems) where they would be a moderate or low drinking water threat as identified in the Assessment Report in the Cana, Lansdowne and Miller Manor Wellhead Protection Areas, should incorporate available source protection information in its decision-making process, and require the incorporation of appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water as part of any environmental compliance approval. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.17-CW |
Where existing on-site sewage systems (i.e. septic systems and holding tanks) are significant drinking water threats and have a certificate of approval or environmental compliance approval, the approval shall ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. The Director at the Ministry of the Environment should consider including requirements for regular maintenance inspections every 5 years using a standard equal to or greater than the On-Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspections, March 2011 guidelines for on-site sewage system maintenance inspection programs under the Ontario Building Code. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.18-NB |
a. If a municipality establishes an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program for the balance of the wellhead protection area where these systems are moderate or low drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment should also consider conducting inspections during the same timeframe, using a standard equal to or greater than the On-Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspections, March 2011 guidelines for on-site sewage system maintenance inspection programs under the Ontario Building Code.
|
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.2-NB |
Municipalities, in consultation within their respective principal authorities, should consider establishing a discretionary on-site sewage system (i.e. septic system and holding tank) maintenance inspection program under the Ontario Building Code, and extending the education and awareness program specified in 6.2.1- CW to the balance of the Wellhead Protection Areas where on-site sewage systems are moderate or low drinking water threats.
The principal authority for Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code for each of the municipalities should also provide notice of whether or not a discretionary sewage system (i.e. septic system and holding tank) maintenance inspection program(s) will be established, including the applicable areas and a rationale for the decision, by February 15 of the year following implementation. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.21-CW |
The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall not approve NASM Plans for the application to land, handling and/or storage of non-agricultural source material where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats in
Cana WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10
Lansdowne WHPA-A and WHPA-B
Miller Manor WHPA-A and WHPA-B.
This prohibition does not apply to the application of non-agricultural source material to land in Lansdowne WHPAB provided that the land is suitable for this activity, and any approvals incorporate appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.22-CW |
Approvals for revised nutrient management strategies and/or plans should be conditional on the implementation of risk management measures and/or best management practices that address the storage of agricultural source material that is a significant drinking water threat for sites in Lansdowne and Miller Manor WHPA-A and WHPA-B. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.23-HR |
Approvals for new and/or revised NASM plans or nutrient management strategies and/or plans should be conditional on the implementation of risk management measures and/or best management practices addressing the application to land and/or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material where there is a low drinking water threat for sites in:
Cana WHPA-C and WHPA-D
Lansdowne WHPA-C and WHPA-D
Miller Manor WHPA-C and WHPA-D where the vulnerability score is 6. |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.26-NB |
The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority should notify the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority and the Cataraqui Source Protection Committee of any proposals under Ontario Regulation 148/06 (Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses) to engage in activities within or in close proximity to the Cana, Lansdowne and Miller Manor Wellhead Protection Areas that may result in the creation of a new transport pathway or the modification of an existing transport pathway. This notice shall include a description of the proposal, the identity of the person responsible for the proposal and a description of the approvals the person requires to engage in the proposed activity.
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority will use the information from a. to conduct an assessment to determine the potential impact of the proposal on the delineation and or the vulnerability score of the wellhead protection area, and may make recommendations to the municipality, or propose an amendment to the Source Protection Plan that relates to the implementation of the proposal, as per subsection 48(2) of Ontario Regulation 287/07 (General).
The notification specified in a. is not required in situations where the municipality having jurisdiction provides notification to the Source Protection Authority under subsection 27(3) of Ontario Regulation 287/07 (General). |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.27-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should undertake an updated analysis of the compliance and enforcement program associated with Regulation 903 - Wells, as amended, made under the Ontario Water Resources Act.
The program analysis should consider:
increased Ministry of the Environment field presence with well contractors
prioritization of complaint response in instances where the presence of a transport pathway would endanger sources of municipal drinking water,
focusing resources in areas where improperly constructed, maintained or abandoned wells may increase the potential threat to municipal drinking water sources.
Action to implement this analysis should be initiated within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect and be completed in a timely manner. Beneficial program changes, as identified via the analysis, should follow.
The Ministry of the Environment should include information about this policy in an annual summary of actions taken to achieve outcomes of source protection policies and make it available to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.28-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should analyze the need to amend Regulation 903 (Wells) under the Ontario Water Resources Act to require well decommissioning when a replacement well is installed in a wellhead protection area, to prevent the creation of transport pathways from improperly abandoned or maintained wells.
The provision in a. would apply unless a specific exemption has been granted whereby the existing well is in good condition and will continue to be used or maintained for future use.
The Ministry of the Environment should include information about this policy in an annual summary of actions taken to achieve outcomes of source protection policies and make it available to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.5-CW |
Municipalities, via Planning Act or Condominium Act decisions, shall prohibit the following land uses in the future in WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10:
- waste disposal sites involving one or more of the following activities that would be significant drinking water threats: the application of agricultural source material, non-agricultural source material and untreated septage (i.e., hauled sewage) to land; storage of mine tailings; landfarming of petroleum refining waste; landfilling of hazardous, municipal and solid nonhazardous industrial or commercial waste; liquid industrial waste injection into a well and PCB waste storage.
- wastewater treatment facilities and related infrastructure that would be significant drinking water threats (i.e. sanitary sewers and related pipes (Cana and Lansdowne only), sewage treatment plant effluent discharges including lagoons and storage of sewage). This policy excludes the replacement, expansion or upgrade of existing facilities. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.6-CW |
Municipalities, via Planning Act or Condominium Act decisions, shall prohibit the following land uses from becoming established in the future in WHPA-B and WHPA-C where the vulnerability score is 8:
- waste disposal sites involving one or more of the following activities that would be significant drinking water threats: landfilling of municipal, solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste, and liquid industrial waste injection into a well.
- wastewater treatment facilities involving the storage of sewage (e.g., treatment plant tanks), which would be significant drinking water threats. This policy excludes the replacement, expansion or upgrade of existing facilities. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.7-HR |
Municipalities reviewing proposals under the Planning Act or Condominium Act for new development and for expansions to existing development located in WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 8, WHPA-C, WHPA-D, or in Cana WHPA-E where it does not overlap with WHPA-A and involving one or more of the activities listed below, should incorporate measures/management practices to adequately manage the risk to groundwater quality associated with those activities. This policy contains examples of land uses associated with these activities, which are moderate or low drinking water threats, and is not considered to be an exhaustive list.
the handling and storage of more than 25 litres of organic solvents (e.g., metal manufacturing, electroplating and fabrication industries, automotive or equipment repair shops, furniture refinishing shops, dry cleaning establishments)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer and/or more than 250 kilograms or litres of pesticide at a facility where it is sold or stored for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed (e.g., lawn and garden centres, farm supply stores, yard maintenance contractors, golf courses)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel (e.g., gas stations)
the handling and storage of more than 500 tonnes of road salt (e.g., public or private maintenance yards)
at or above-grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare (e.g., public or private maintenance yards, snow dumps)
the storage of PCBs (e.g., waste transfer stations).
For development proposals in WHPA-D, this policy should also apply to the handling and storage of more than 25 litres of DNAPLs (e.g., metal manufacturing, electroplating and fabrication industries, automotive or equipment repair shops, furniture refinishing shops, dry cleaning establishments). |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.2.8-HR |
Municipalities should consider how to incorporate low impact development techniques in Planning Act or Condominium Act decisions related to proposed stormwater management for new or expanding development, excluding single lot residential development, in the wellhead protection areas. These techniques should be used to reduce impervious surfaces, maintain pre-development recharge and use lot level controls to emphasize infiltration of clean water at the point of origin to improve the quality discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond that would be a moderate or low drinking water threat. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.1-CW |
The City of Kingston shall consider developing a land purchase strategy for WHPA-A and prepare a set of criteria for securing those parcels of land deemed necessary to directly control the occurrence of any significant drinking water threats.
The action specified in a. shall be implemented within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, and a copy of the strategy, if developed, shall be provided to the Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.10-NB |
The City of Kingston, in cooperation with Utilities Kingston should consider extending the education and outreach program specified in 6.3.9-CW to the balance of the area that is connected to this sanitary sewer and related pipes network, where it is a low drinking water threat. |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.11-CW |
a. The City of Kingston, in cooperation with Utilities Kingston, shall implement the Cana Wastewater Treatment Plant Annual Cleaning and Inspection Standard
Operating Procedure (WWT4-S-01), as amended from time to time, in relation to the sewage tank (i.e. sewage storage) located in WHPA-A, and ensure that if
a problem with the tank is identified that prioritization of corrective action takes into consideration the risk posed by the tank’s proximity to the Cana Supply Well.
b. The City shall provide a copy of the record of inspection and any resultant repairs to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority within 60 days of its completion.
|
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.12-NB |
Utilities Kingston should revise its Standard Operating Procedure to include a routine check of the drainage swale located approximately 20 metres south of the Cana Well Supply for any blockages to ensure that the transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply for the drinking water system.
The Standard Operating Procedure should be updated within six months of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If any blockages are observed, Utilities Kingston should advise the City of Kingston Public Works Department, and request that positive drainage be restored as soon as practical so that localized ponding does not occur. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.2-CW |
Under the following circumstances, the handling and storage of fuel are significant drinking water threats, and are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities in Cana WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10:
the existing and future below grade or partially below grade storage of more than 250 litres but less than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel, and any associated fuel handling
the existing storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel at any grade and any associated fuel handling, excluding above grade handling and storage at bulk plants and facilities that manufacture or refine fuel.
The risk management plan for the handling and storage of liquid fuel associated with oil for heating appliances (e.g., furnaces) should require, at a minimum, annual inspections by a certified Fuel Oil Burning Appliance Technician, confirmation of the repair and/or replacement of any defective equipment to the satisfaction of the certified Technician, and the implementation of best management practices as appropriate such as the installation of leak detection and spill containment equipment.
The risk management plan for the handling and storage of liquid fuel for purposes other than heating oil should consider, at a minimum, annual inspection, confirmation of repair and/or replacement of any defective equipment to the satisfaction of a TSSA inspector, and staff training.
If one or more of the activities listed in a. is engaged in immediately before the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If the activity listed in a. i. is to be engaged in after the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established before the activity becomes established. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.3-CW |
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) of any quantity in Cana WHPA-A, WHPA-B or WHPA-C and/or an organic solvent in WHPA-A or WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10, where they are significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing commercial or industrial uses.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the repair and/or replacement of defective equipment, staff training, and the implementation of best management practices as appropriate.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.4-CW |
In Cana WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10, the following drinking water threats are significant and are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act:
The storage of hazardous waste at waste disposal sites; and
The storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General -Waste Management), as amended.
Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing or future uses and planned specific storage of the wastes, as identified above, is necessary and part of normal practice.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the suitability of the storage container(s), the repair and/or replacement of defective or unsuitable storage equipment, staff training and collection of waste materials by a licensed and qualified person, as per Ministry of the Environment guidelines.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.5-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, these activities are prohibited from becoming established in the future in Cana WHPA-A:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of pesticide containing MCPA or Mecoprop on at least 1 hectare of land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing, outdoor confinement areas or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms of commercial fertilizer for the purpose of retail sale or application
the handling and storage of pesticide where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed, in the specified mass or volume and containing the specified active ingredient(s):
more than 250 kilograms containing MCPA or Mecoprop
more than 2,500 kilograms containing Dicamba, 2,4-D, 1,3 Dichloropropene, MCPA, Metalaxyl, Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of pesticide containing MCPA or Mecoprop, where it is stored at a facility where it is manufactured, distributed or processed.
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents in the volume specified and containing the specified chemical(s):
more than 25 litres containing carbon tetrachloride below or partially below grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride above grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride below or partially below grade
more than 2500 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride at any grade
more than 2500 litres containing pentachlorophenol below or partially grade
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel above, below or partially below grade, excluding above grade handling and storage at bulk plants and facilities that manufacture or refine fuel
the handling and storage of more than 5,000 tonnes of road salt in a manner that may result in its exposure to precipitation or runoff from precipitation or snow melt
below grade snow storage that is more than 0.01 hectare or at or above grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.6-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, these activities are prohibited from becoming established in the future in Cana WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing and pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs)
the handling and storage of pesticide at a facility where it is sold or stored for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed,, in the specified mass or volume and containing the specified active ingredient(s):
more than 250 kilograms containing MCPA or Mecoprop
more than 2,500 kilograms containing Dicamba, 2,4-D, 1,3 Dichloropropene, MCPA, Metalaxyl, Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents in the volume specified and containing the specified chemical(s):
more than 25 litres containing carbon tetrachloride below or partially below grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride above grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform or methylene chloride below or partially below grade
more than 2,500 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride at any grade
more than 2,500 litres containing pentachlorophenol below or partially below grade
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel above, below, or partially below grade, excluding above-grade handling and storage at bulk plants and facilities that manufacture or refine fuel
the handling and storage of more than 5,000 tonnes of road salt in a manner that may result in its exposure to precipitation or runoff from precipitation or snow melt
below grade snow storage that is more than 0.01 hectares in area or at or above grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.7-CW |
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) where it would be a significant drinking water threat is designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore this activity is prohibited from becoming established in the future in Cana WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 8, and in WHPA-C. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.8-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are included in Section 59 designations under the Clean Water Act for the Cana Wellhead Protection Area as follows:
All land uses are designated in WHPA-A and WHPA B where the vulnerability score is 10 for the handling and storage of fuel.
All land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-A where the vulnerability score is 10 for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of pesticides to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of a DNAPL
the handling and storage of pesticide
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents
the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
the handling and storage of road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous wastes at waste disposal sites
the storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General-Waste Management), as amended.
All land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10 for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
livestock grazing or pasturing, outdoor confinement areas and farm animal yards
the handling and storage of a DNAPL
the handling and storage of pesticide
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents
the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
the handling and storage of road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous wastes at waste disposal sites
the storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General-Waste Management), as amended.
All land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 8 and WHPA-C for the handling and storage of a DNAPL. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.3.9-CW |
The City of Kingston, in cooperation with Utilities Kingston, shall develop and deliver an education and outreach program to landowners in Cana WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10 that are connected to the Cana sanitary sewers and related pipe network to identify any cracks or misalignments of the sewer laterals, within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
Educational materials should identify the wellhead protection area and indicate that in order to protect the groundwater and optimize function and effluent quality at the wastewater treatment facility, it is important for landowners to repair any identified deficiencies.
The City shall provide a copy of any developed materials to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority within 60 days of its completion. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.1-CW |
The Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands shall consider developing a land purchase strategy for WHPA-A and prepare a set of criteria for securing those parcels of land deemed necessary to directly control the occurrence of any significant drinking water threats.
The action specified in a. shall be implemented within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, and a copy of the strategy, if developed, shall be provided to the Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.10-CW |
The Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands shall prepare a Standard Operating Procedures manual that outlines sewer network evaluation and repair requirements such that the entire sewer network in at least Lansdowne WHPA-A and WHPA-B is evaluated no less frequently than every ten years, and repaired as necessary, in order to prevent sewage losses to the source water since the sanitary sewers and the related pipes are a significant drinking water threat.
The Standard Operating Procedures manual specified in a. shall be prepared within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
The Township shall provide a copy of the Standard Operating Procedure and sewer network evaluations to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.11-NB |
The Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands should develop a monitoring plan for the Lansdowne Sewage Lagoons at King Street East located in WHPAC and WHPA-D to identify any sewage treatment plan effluent discharge losses to the sub-surface and take corrective action to remedy any identified concerns. The existing sewage lagoon, at current capacity, is a low drinking water threat in WHPA-C.
The action specified in a. should be implemented within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If the foregoing is undertaken by the Township, the Township should provide a copy of the monitoring plan to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority within 60 days of its completion or after its endorsement by Council, if applicable. |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.12-NB |
The Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands should prepare a master drainage plan to improve drainage in the Lansdowne Wellhead Protection Area to ensure that local drainage ceases to endanger the raw water supply of the Lansdowne drinking water system. The plan should address, at a minimum, the existing drainage ditch east and north of supply Well #2, which was identified as a transport pathway in the Assessment Report, and runoff from the recreational fields to the west. The drainage plan will consider an alternate route for the drainage ditch and will address the historical water ponding observed in the vicinity of the supply wells.
The master drainage plan should be prepared within three years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If the foregoing is undertaken by the Township, the Township should provide a copy of the master drainage plan to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority within 60 days of its completion or after its endorsement by Council, if applicable. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.13-NB |
The Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands should develop and implement a water quality monitoring program to track runoff from the municipal buildings and parking lot(s) located in WHPA-B where road salt storage and handling is a low drinking water threat to determine if additional measures are required to limit migration of road salt from the salt storage building and parking lots.
The action specified in a. should be implemented within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
The Township should provide a copy of the monitoring plan to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority within 60 days of its completion or after its endorsement by Council, if applicable; and an annual record of the water quality results by February 15 of each year. |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.14-CW |
The Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands shall maintain By-law 06-056, as amended, regarding the timely removal of agricultural source material from the subject lands in WHPA-A and WHPA-B where land is used as an outdoor confinement area and this activity is a significant drinking water threat. Monthly compliance inspections shall be performed by the Township.
The Township shall provide a record of the monthly compliance inspections to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority by February 15 of each year. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.2-CW |
Under the following circumstances, the handling and storage of liquid fuel are significant drinking water threats, and are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities in Lansdowne WHPA-A and WHPA-B:
the existing and future below grade or partially below grade storage of more than 250 litres but less than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel, and any associated fuel handling
the existing storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel at any grade and any associated fuel handling, excluding above-grade handling and storage at bulk plants and facilities that manufacture or refine fuel.
The risk management plan for the handling and storage of liquid fuel associated with oil for heating appliances (e.g., furnaces) should require, at a minimum, annual inspections by a certified Fuel Oil Burning Appliance Technician, confirmation of the repair and/or replacement of any defective equipment to the satisfaction of the certified Technician, and the implementation of best management practices as appropriate such as the installation of leak detection and spill containment equipment.
The risk management plan for the handling and storage of liquid fuel for purposes other than heating oil should consider, at a minimum, annual inspection, confirmation of repair and/or replacement of any defective equipment to the satisfaction of a TSSA inspector, and staff training.
If one or more of the activities listed in a. is engaged in immediately before the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be agreed to within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If the activity listed in a. i. is to be engaged in after the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be agreed to before the activity becomes established. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.3-CW |
The following activities, where they are significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities in the specified areas of the Lansdowne Wellhead Protection Area:
in WHPA-A:
the existing storage of agricultural source material
the existing use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard.
in WHPA-B:
the existing and future application of agricultural source material to land
the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land
the existing and future application of pesticide to land containing MCPA or Mecoprop on at least 1 hectare
the existing and future application of pesticide to land containing Atrazine, Dicamba, 2,4-D, 1,3 Dichloropropene, MCPB, Metalaxyl, Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor on at least 10 hectares
the existing and future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the existing storage of agricultural source material.
A risk management plan is not required where the activity listed in a. is already managed by a nutrient management strategy and/or plan through Ontario Regulation 267/03 (General), or through municipal By-law 06-056.
The risk management plan should be consistent with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 267/03 and agricultural best management practices, and recognize existing good management practices, as appropriate.
If one or more of these activities is engaged in immediately before the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If one or more of these activities is to be engaged in after the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established before the activity becomes established. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.4-CW |
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) of any quantity in Lansdowne WHPA-A, WHPA-B, or WHPA-C and/or an organic solvent in WHPA-A or WHPA-B, where they are significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing commercial or industrial uses.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the repair and/or replacement of defective equipment, staff training, and the implementation of best management practices as appropriate.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.5-CW |
In Lansdowne WHPA-A and WHPA-B, the following drinking water threats are significant and are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act:
the storage of hazardous waste at waste disposal sites and
the storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management), as amended.
Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing or future uses and planned specific storage of the wastes, as identified above, is necessary and part of normal practice.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the suitability of the storage container(s), the repair and/or replacement of defective or unsuitable storage equipment, staff training and collection of waste materials by a licensed and qualified person, as per Ministry of the Environment guidelines.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.6-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, these activities are prohibited from becoming established in the future in Lansdowne WHPA-A.
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of commercial fertilizer to land (this applies only to WHPA-A for Supply Well 2)
the application of pesticide containing the specified active ingredient(s) on the specified land area:
MCPA or Mecoprop on at least 1 hectare
Atrazine, Dicamba, 2,4-D, 1,3 Dichloropropene, MCPB, Metalaxyl, Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor on at least 10 hectares
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL)
the handling and storage of pesticide at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed, in the specified mass or volume and containing the specified active ingredient(s):
more than 250 kilograms or litres containing MCPA or Mecoprop
more than 2,500 kilograms or litres containing Dicamba, 2,4-D, 1,3 Dichloropropene, MCPA, Metalaxyl, Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of pesticide containing MCPA or Mecoprop, where it is stored at a facility where it is manufactured, distributed or processed
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents in the volume specified and containing the specified chemical(s)
more than 25 litres containing carbon tetrachloride below or partially below grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride above grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform or methylene chloride below or partially below grade
more than 2,500 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride at any grade
more than 2,500 litres containing pentachlorophenol below or partially below grade
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel above, below or partially below grade, excluding above grade handling and storage at bulk plants and facilities that manufacture or refine fuel
the handling and storage of more than 5,000 tonnes of road salt in a manner that may result in its exposure to precipitation or runoff from precipitation or snow melt
below-grade snow storage that is more than 0.01 hectares or at or above-grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.7-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, these activities are prohibited from becoming established in the future in Lansdowne WHPA-B:
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL)
the handling and storage of pesticides at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed, in the specified mass and containing the specified active ingredient(s):
more than 250 kilograms or litres containing MCPA or Mecoprop
more than 2,500 kilograms containing Dicamba, 2,4-D, 1,3 Dichloropropene, MCPA, Metalaxyl, Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents in the volume specified and containing the specified chemical(s):
more than 25 litres containing carbon tetrachloride below or partially below grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride above grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform or methylene chloride below or partially below grade
more than 2,500 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride at any grade
more than 2,500 litres containing pentachlorophenol
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or liters of commercial fertilizer at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 liters of liquid fuel above, below or partially below grade, excluding above grade handling and storage at bulk plants and facilities that manufacture or refine fuel
the storage and handling of road salt
below grade snow storage that is more than 0.01 hectare or at or above grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.8-CW |
The handling and storage of any volume of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) where it would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, this activity is prohibited from becoming established in the future in Lansdowne WHPA-C. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.4.9-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are included in Section 59 designations under the Clean Water Act for the Lansdowne Wellhead Protection Area as follows:
All land uses are designated in WHPA-A and WHPA B for the handling and storage of fuel.
All land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-A:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of commercial fertilizer to land (this applies to WHPA-A of Supply Well 2 only)
the application of pesticide to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of a DNAPL
the handling and storage of pesticide
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvent
the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
the handling and storage of road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous waste at waste disposal sites
the storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management), as amended.
All land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-B:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of commercial fertilizer to land
the application of pesticide to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of a DNAPL
the handling and storage of pesticide
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents
the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
the handling and storage or road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous waste at waste disposal sites
the storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management), as amended.
All land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-C for the handling and storage of a DNAPL. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.1-CW |
Under the following circumstances, the handling and storage of liquid fuel are significant drinking water threats, and are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities in Miller Manor WHPA-A and WHPA-B:
the existing and future below grade or partially below grade storage of more than 250 litres but less than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel, and any associated fuel handling.
The risk management plan for the handling and storage of liquid fuel associated with oil for heating appliances (e.g., furnaces) should require, at a minimum, annual inspections by a certified Fuel Oil Burning Appliance Technician, confirmation of the repair and/or replacement of any defective equipment to the satisfaction of the certified Technician, and the implementation of best management practices as appropriate such as the installation of leak detection and spill containment equipment.
If these activities are engaged in immediately before the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be agreed to within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If these activities are to be engaged in after the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be agreed to before the activity becomes established. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.2-CW |
The following activities, where they are or would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required in the specified areas of the Miller Manor Wellhead Protection Area:
in WHPA-A:
the existing use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard
the existing storage of agricultural source material.
in WHPA-B:
the existing and future application of agricultural source material to land
the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land for agricultural purposes
the existing and future use of land as livestock grazing and pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard.
A risk management plan is not required where the activity listed in a. is already managed by a nutrient management strategy and/or plan through Ontario Regulation 267/03 (General).
The risk management plan should be consistent with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 267/03 and agriculture best management practices, and recognize existing good management practices, as appropriate.
If one or more of the activities listed in a. is engaged in immediately before the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If one or more of the activities listed in a. ii. is to be engaged in after the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established before the activity becomes established. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.3-CW |
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) of any quantity in Miller Manor WHPA-A, WHPA-B or WHPA-C and/or an organic solvent in WHPA-A or WHPA-B, where they are significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing commercial or industrial uses.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the repair and/or replacement of defective equipment, staff training, and the implementation of best management practices as appropriate.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.4-CW |
In Miller Manor WHPA-A and WHPA-B, the following drinking water threats are significant and are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act:
the storage of hazardous waste at waste disposal sites and
the storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management), as amended.
Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing or future uses and planned specific storage of the wastes, as identified above, is necessary and part of normal practice.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the suitability of the storage container(s), the repair and/or replacement of defective or unsuitable storage equipment, staff training and collection of waste materials by a licensed and qualified person, as per Ministry of the Environment guidelines.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.5-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, these activities are prohibited from becoming established in the future in Miller Manor WHPA-A:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of commercial fertilizer to land
the application of pesticide to land containing MCPA or Mecoprop on at least 1 hectare
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard
the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs)
the handling and storage of pesticide at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed, in the specified mass or volume and containing the specified active ingredient(s):
more than 250 kilograms or litres containing MCPA or Mecoprop
more than 2,500 kilograms or litres containing Dicamba, 2,4-D, 1,3 Dichloropropene, MCPA, Metalaxyl, Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of pesticide containing MCPA or Mecoprop at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites or at a facility where it is manufactured, distributed or processed
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents in the volume specified and containing the specified chemical(s):
more than 25 litres containing carbon tetrachloride below or partially below grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride above grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform or methylene chloride below or partially below grade
more than 2,500 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform or methylene chloride at any grade
more than 2,500 litres containing pentachlorophenol below or partially below grade
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel above, below or partially below grade, excluding above grade handling and storage at bulk plants and facilities that manufacture or refine fuel
the handling and storage of more than 5,000 tonnes of road salt in a manner that may result in its exposure to precipitation or runoff from precipitation or snow melt
below grade snow storage areas that are more than 0.01 hectare in area or above grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.6-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, these activities are prohibited from becoming established in the future in Miller Manor WHPA-B:
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs)
the handling and storage of pesticide at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed, in the specified mass and containing the specified active ingredient(s):
more than 250 kilograms or litres containing MCPA or Mecoprop
more than 2,500 kilograms or litres containing Dicamba, 2,4-D, 1,3 Dichloropropene, MCPA, Metalaxyl, Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of organic solvents in the volume specified and containing the specified chemical(s):
more than 25 litres containing carbon tetrachloride below or partially below grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride above grade
more than 250 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform or methylene chloride below or partially below grade
more than 2,500 litres containing carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, methylene chloride at any grade
more than 2,500 litres containing pentachlorophenol below or partially below grade.
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer at facilities where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel above, below or partially below grade, excluding above-grade handling and storage at bulk plants and facilities that manufacture or refine fuel
the handling and storage of road salt
below-grade snow storage that is more than 0.01 hectare or above-grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.7-CW |
The handling and storage of any volume of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) where it would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore, this activity is prohibited from becoming established in the future in Miller Manor WHPA-C. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.8-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are included in Section 59 designations under the Clean Water Act for the Miller Manor Wellhead Protection Area as follows:
all land uses are designated in WHPA-A and WHPA B for the handling and storage of liquid fuel
all land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-A for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of commercial fertilizer to land
the application of pesticide to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of a DNAPL
the handling and storage of pesticides
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of an organic solvent
the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
the handling and storage of road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous waste at waste disposal sites
the storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management), as amended.
All land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-B for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of commercial fertilizer to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of a DNAPL
the handling and storage of pesticides
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of an organic solvent
the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
the storage and handling of road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous waste at waste disposal sites
the storage of wastes at waste disposal sites as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste in Ontario Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management), as amended.
All land uses except residential are designated in WHPA-C for:
the handling and storage of a DNAPL. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
6.5.9-NB |
The United Counties of Leeds and Grenville should ensure that the ditch along County Road 2 to the south of the Miller Manor Apartments supply well is properly conveying water and perform any necessary improvements to prevent water from pooling in this location, within six months of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.1-NB |
Municipalities, in consultation with their respective principal authorities under Part 8 of the Ontario Building Code, should establish an on-site sewage system (i.e. septic systems and holding tanks) maintenance inspection program consistent with the Ontario Building Code and the inspection guidelines under the Code for Sydenham, Brockville and James W. King IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 to address these moderate and low drinking water threats.
Consideration for the establishment of the program identified in a. should be done by October 6, 2016 (i.e., five years following the approval of the Assessment Report).
Any resulting program should provide information to landowners about the proper operation and maintenance of their on-site sewage systems (i.e. septic systems and holding tanks), and about the benefits of a well maintained system.
The implementation of this policy should be done with consideration for the inspection program that is encouraged in policy 5.4.1-NB, as well as previous on-site sewage system inspection programs in the area.
If the foregoing is implemented, the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority should be provided notice of any on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, including the applicable area, rationale, and a summary of inspection results, by February 15 of the year following program implementation. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.10-HR |
The Ministry of the Environment, when reviewing applications for the establishment of new waste disposal sites that would be moderate or low drinking water threats, should incorporate available source protection information in its decision-making process, and require the incorporation of appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water as part of any environmental compliance approval.
The provision in a. applies to the following types of waste disposal sites where they would be a moderate or low drinking water threat as identified in the Assessment Report:
for the Brockville and James W. King Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2 and Sydenham Intake Protection Zones 1, 2 and 3a:
landfarming of petroleum refining waste
landfilling of hazardous, municipal, or solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste
liquid industrial waste injection into a well.
for the A.L. Dafoe, Bath, Fairfield, Kingston Central, Point Pleasant, and Sandhurst Shores Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2:
the application of non-agricultural source material to land
the application of untreated septage (i.e., hauled sewage) to land
land farming of petroleum refining waste
landfilling of hazardous, municipal, solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste
liquid industrial waste injection into a well. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.11-CW |
The Ministry of the Environment shall not permit the establishment of new sewage works that collects, stores, treats or disposes of sewage in Brockville, James W. King and Sydenham Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2 where the following activities would be significant drinking water threats:
combined sewer discharges from a stormwater outlet to surface water
sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water
industrial effluent discharges
sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (including lagoons)
storage of sewage (e.g., treatment plant tanks). |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.12-HR |
The Ministry of the Environment, when reviewing applications for the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage should incorporate available source protection information in its decision-making process, and require the incorporation of appropriate risk management measures to protect the source of drinking water as part of any environmental compliance approval.
The provision in a. applies to the following types of sewage works where they would be a moderate or low drinking water threat:
for the Brockville and James W. King Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2 and Sydenham Intake Protection Zones 1, 2 and 3a:
discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond
industrial effluent discharges
management of agricultural source material where land or water is used for aquaculture
storage of sewage (e.g., treatment plant tanks)
for the A.L. Dafoe, Bath, Fairfield, Kingston Central, Point Pleasant and Sandhurst Shores Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2:
combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water
discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond
industrial effluent discharges
sanitary sewers and related pipes
sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water
sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (including lagoons)
sewage storage (e.g., treatment plant tanks)
management of agricultural source material where land or water is used for aquaculture. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.15-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should include requirements for spill contingency plans for businesses that haul septage by barge in the following areas as part of any new or amended licenses or environmental compliance approvals under the Environmental Protection Act, as appropriate, to identify the locations of the municipal intake(s) and intake protection zone(s) in relation to the business' travel routes, and to update their procedures to better manage the risk to the drinking water source(s) in the event of an emergency, spill or unauthorized discharge related to the transportation and handling of hauled sewage:
on the St. Lawrence River in Brockville IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
on the St. Lawrence River in James W. King IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
on Sydenham Lake in Sydenham IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3a.
The Ministry of the Environment should publish information to demonstrate implementation of this policy in a timely manner and in a location that is readily accessible to the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.16-NB |
The Ministry of the Environment should encourage industries that are located in and adjacent to the Intake Protection Zones (IPZ) to review and amend the applicable operational plans, spill prevention and contingency plans and pollution prevention plans, as appropriate, to identify the locations of municipal intake(s) and intake protection zone(s) in relation to their operations, and to update their procedures to better manage the risk to the drinking water source(s) in the event of an emergency, spill or unauthorized discharge.
The Ministry of the Environment should implement a. within three years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of environmental compliance approvals that govern activities that are drinking water threats. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.17-CW |
The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall not approve NASM Plans for the application to land, handling and/or storage of non-agricultural source material where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats in:
Brockville IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
James W. King IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
Sydenham IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.18-HR |
The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs should make approvals for new and/or revised NASM plans conditional on the implementation of risk management measures and/or best management practices addressing the application to land and/or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material for sites in:
A.L. Dafoe IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
Bath IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
Fairfield IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
Sandhurst Shores IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.19-CW |
Approvals for new and/or revised nutrient management strategies and/or plans should be conditional on the implementation of risk management measures and/or best management practices addressing the application to land and/or storage of agricultural source material where they are significant drinking water threats for sites in:
James W. King IPZ-2
Sydenham IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.2-CW |
The following land uses shall be prohibited from becoming established in the future in Sydenham, Brockville and James W. King IPZ-1:
- waste disposal sites involving one or more of the following activities that would be significant drinking water threats: the storage of mine tailings, land farming of petroleum refining waste, land filling of hazardous waste, land filling of municipal waste and land filling of solid non-hazardous waste
- wastewater treatment facilities and related infrastructure that would be significant drinking water threats (i.e. industrial effluent discharges, sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water, sewage treatment plant effluent discharges and the storage of sewage). |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.20-HR |
Approvals for new and/or revised nutrient management strategies and/or plans should be conditional on the implementation of risk management measures and/or best management practices addressing the application to land and/or storage of agricultural source material for sites in:
A.L. Dafoe IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
Bath IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
Fairfield IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
Sandhurst Shores IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.23-NB |
When making decisions on applications under Ontario Regulation 664/98 (Fish Licensing) of the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act for the establishment of new caged aquaculture operations in Brockville IPZ-1, James W. King IPZ-1, or Sydenham IPZ-1, IPZ-2 or IPZ-3a, the Ministry of Natural Resources should ensure that appropriate risk management measures are included in the facility design to protect these drinking water sources from the risk associated with the management of agricultural source material. |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.24-NB |
The Cataraqui Region Conservation Authority should notify the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority and the Cataraqui Source Protection Committee of any proposals under Ontario Regulation 148/06 (Development, Interference with Wetlands and Alterations to Shorelines and Watercourses) to engage in activities within or in close proximity to the A.L. Dafoe, Bath, Brockville, Fairfield, James W. King, Kingston Central, Point Pleasant, Sandhurst Shores, and Sydenham Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2 that may result in the creation of a new transport pathway or the modification of an existing transport pathway. This notice shall include a description of the proposal, the identity of the person responsible for the proposal and a description of the approvals the person requires to engage in the proposed activity.
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority will use the information from a. to conduct an assessment to determine the potential impact of the proposal on the delineation and or the vulnerability score of the intake protection zone, and may make recommendations to the municipality, or propose an amendment to the Source Protection Plan that relates to the implementation of the proposal, as per subsection 48(2) of Ontario Regulation 287/07 (General).
The notification specified in a. is not required in situations where the municipality having jurisdiction provides notification to the Source Protection Authority under subsection 27(3) of Ontario Regulation 287/07 (General). |
Cataraqui |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.3-CW |
The following land uses shall be prohibited from becoming established in the future in Sydenham, Brockville and James W. King IPZ-2:
- wastewater treatment facilities and related infrastructure that would be significant drinking water threats (i.e. sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water, industrial effluent discharges and sewage treatment plant effluent discharges). |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.4-HR |
Proposals under the Planning Act or Condominium Act for new development and for expansions to existing development located in Sydenham, Brockville and James W. King IPZ-1, and involving one or more of the activities listed below, should incorporate measures/management practices to adequately manage the risk to the community's source of drinking water that is associated with those activities. This policy contains examples of land uses associated with these activities, which are moderate or low drinking water threats, and is not considered to be an exhaustive list.
the handling and storage of more than 25 litres of dense a non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) and/or an organic solvent (e.g., metal manufacturing, electroplating and fabrication industries, automotive or equipment repair shops, furniture refinishing shops, dry cleaning establishments)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kg or litres of commercial fertilizer at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed (e.g., lawn and garden centres, farm supply stores, yard maintenance contractors, golf courses)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel (e.g., gas stations, marinas)
Proposals under the Planning Act or Condominium Act for new development and for expansions to existing development located in Sydenham, Brockville and James W. King IPZ-2 or Sydenham IPZ-3a, and involving one or more of the activities listed below that are moderate or low drinking water threats, should incorporate measures/management practices to adequately manage the risk to the community's source of drinking water that is associated with those activities. This policy contains examples of land uses associated with these activities, which are moderate or low drinking water threats, and is not considered to be an exhaustive list.
the storage of sewage associated with a sewage system or sewage works
the handling and storage of more than 250 litres of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) and/or an organic solvent (e.g., metal manufacturing, electroplating and fabrication industries, automotive or equipment repair shops, furniture refinishing shops, dry cleaning establishments)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer and/or more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of pesticide at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed, (e.g., lawn and garden centres, farm supply stores, yard maintenance contractors, golf courses)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel (e.g., gas stations, marinas)
the handling and storage of greater than 500 tonnes of road salt (e.g., public or private maintenance yards). |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.5-HR |
Proposals under the Planning Act or Condominium Act for new development and for expansions to existing development located in Point Pleasant IPZ-1, or Kingston Central, Fairfield, Bath, A.L. Dafoe or Sandhurst Shores IPZ-1 or IPZ-2, and involving one or more of the activities listed below, should incorporate measures/management practices to adequately manage the risk to the community's sources of drinking water that is associated with those activities. This policy contains examples of land uses associated with these activities, which are low drinking water threats, and is not considered to be an exhaustive list.
the handling and storage of more than 250 litres of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) and/or organic solvents (e.g., metal manufacturing, electroplating and fabrication industries, automotive or equipment repair shops, furniture refinishing shops, dry cleaning establishments)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of commercial fertilizer and/or 2,500 kilograms or litres of pesticide at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed, (e.g., lawn and garden centres, farm supply stores, yard maintenance contractors, golf courses)
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 litres of liquid fuel (e.g., gas stations, marinas)
the handling and storage of more than 500 tonnes of road salt (e.g., public or private maintenance yards)
at or above-grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare (e.g., public or private maintenance yards, snow dumps). |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.8-NB |
The municipalities should develop a strategy to address untreated stormwater runoff or inadequate treatment in IPZ-1 and IPZ-2, within their respective jurisdictions, within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. Discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond is a moderate drinking water threat in the Intake Protection Zone.
Such a strategy could include mapping existing storm sewers, catch basins and outfalls, and monitoring storm water quality, so that treatment can be incorporated at the right location(s); and ensure that road reconstruction projects include appropriate storm runoff controls.
The strategy should be implemented as funding becomes available. |
Cataraqui |
Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.2.9-CW |
The Ministry of the Environment shall not permit the establishment of new waste disposal sites where the following drinking water threats would be significant.
In Brockville, James W. King and Sydenham IPZ-1:
the application of non-agricultural source material to land
the application of untreated septage (i.e., hauled sewage) to land
landfarming of petroleum refining waste
landfilling of hazardous waste
landfilling of municipal waste
landfilling of solid non-hazardous waste and industrial or commercial waste.
In Brockville, James W. King and Sydenham IPZ-2:
the application of non-agricultural source material to land
the application of untreated septage (i.e., hauled sewage) to land. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.3.1-CW |
The following activities, where they are or would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities in Sydenham IPZ-1 and IPZ-2:
the storage of agricultural source material
the application of agricultural source material to land
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard.
A risk management plan is not required where the activity listed in a. is already managed by a nutrient management strategy and/or plan through Ontario Regulation 267/03 (General).
The risk management plan should be consistent with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 267/03 and agriculture best management practices, and recognize existing good management practices, as appropriate.
If one or more of the activities listed in a. is engaged in immediately before the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If one or more of the activities listed in a. is to be engaged in after the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established before the activity becomes established. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.3.2-CW |
The storage of hazardous waste at disposal sites in Sydenham IPZ-1, where they are significant drinking water threats are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing or future uses.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the suitability of the storage container(s), the repair and/or replacement of defective or unsuitable storage equipment, staff training and collection of waste materials by a licensed and qualified hazardous waste collector, as per Ministry of the Environment guidelines.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.3.3-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and are therefore prohibited from becoming established in Sydenham IPZ-1:
the application of pesticides to more than 1 hectare of land, containing MCPA or Mecoprop
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of pesticide containing MCPA or Mecoprop at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the handling and storage of more than 5,000 tonnes of road salt in a manner that may result in its exposure to precipitation or runoff from precipitation or snow melt
at or above-grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.3.4-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are included in Section 59 designations under the Clean Water Act for the Sydenham Intake Protection Zone as follows:
All land uses except residential are designated in IPZ-1 for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of pesticide to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of pesticides
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous wastes at waste disposal sites.
All land uses except residential are designated in IPZ-2 for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the storage of agricultural source material. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.3.5-HR |
Municipalities should require proponents to incorporate stormwater management features in accordance with best practices and that provides enhanced protection (i.e., 80 per cent suspended solids removal), into building and site plans that reduce the volume of contaminants entering storm sewer systems and roadside ditches draining to Sydenham IPZ-1 and/or IPZ-2, or directly to Sydenham Lake, where discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond is a moderate or low drinking water threat.
In addition to the municipal official plan, the requirement identified in a. should be reflected in the site plan control by-law and any development guideline documents. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.3.6-NB |
The Township of South Frontenac should establish fertilizer-free buffer zones between the sports fields in IPZ-1 and Sydenham Lake to address the moderate drinking water threat of application of commercial fertilizer to land within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.3.7-CW |
To assist in identifying the best local risk management measures to address significant drinking water threats related to agricultural runoff (i.e. the application of agricultural source material and the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard) in IPZ 1 and 2, the Township of South Frontenac shall consider undertaking a lakeshore capacity assessment for Sydenham Lake using the Ministry of the Environment Lakeshore Capacity Model, or another appropriate model, to determine the impact of on-site sewage systems, and agricultural runoff, on the water quality of Sydenham Lake.
The Township should implement the findings of this research to inform land use planning decisions and to promote best management practices.
A proposal to undertake this strategic action should occur within five years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, and be shared with the Cataraqui Source Protection Authority at that time. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.4.1-CW |
The application of pesticide to land containing MCPA to land areas more than ten (10) hectares, where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan shall be required in Brockville IPZ-2 for this activity.
The risk management plan may recognize existing best management practices and/or pesticide management plans.
If this activity is engaged in immediately before the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. If this activity is to be engaged in after the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established before the activity becomes established. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.4.2-CW |
The storage of hazardous waste at disposal sites in Brockville IPZ-1, where they are significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing or future uses.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the suitability of the storage container(s), the repair and/or replacement of defective or unsuitable storage equipment, staff training and collection of waste materials by a licensed and qualified hazardous waste collector, as per Ministry of the Environment guidelines.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.4.3-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and are therefore prohibited from becoming established in Brockville IPZ-1:
the application and/or storage of agricultural source material to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of pesticide at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of more than 5,000 tonnes of road salt in a manner that may result in its exposure to precipitation or runoff from precipitation or snow melt
at or above-grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.4.4-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and are therefore prohibited from becoming established in Brockville IPZ-2:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard
the storage of agricultural source material. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.4.5-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are included in Section 59 designations under the Clean Water Act for the Brockville Intake Protection Zone as follows:
All land uses except residential are designated in IPZ-1 for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of pesticides
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous wastes at waste disposal sites.
All land uses except residential are designated in IPZ-2 for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the application of pesticides to land
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the storage of agricultural source material. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.4.6-CW |
The Cataraqui Source Protection Authority shall provide information to agricultural operators in the Brockville Intake Protection Zone about the extent of this vulnerable area and agricultural best management practices that reduce the risk of negative source water impacts related to the following significant drinking water threats in IPZ-2:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the storage of agricultural source material. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.5.1-CW |
The following activities, where they are or would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities in James W. King IPZ-2, within the Township of Leeds and the Thousand Islands:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the storage of agricultural source material.
A risk management plan is not required where the activity listed in a. is already managed by a nutrient management strategy and/or plan through Ontario Regulation 267/03 (General).
The risk management plan should be consistent with the requirements of Ontario Regulation 267/03 and agriculture best management practices, and recognize existing management practices, as appropriate.
If one or more of the activities listed in a. is engaged in immediately before the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
If one or more of the activities listed in a. is to be engaged in after the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the risk management plan shall be established before the activity becomes established. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.5.2-CW |
The storage of hazardous waste at disposal sites in James W King IPZ-1, where they are significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act. Therefore a risk management plan is required for these activities where they relate to existing or future uses.
The risk management plan should consider, at a minimum, the suitability of the storage container(s), the repair and/or replacement of defective or unsuitable storage equipment, staff training and collection of waste materials by a licensed and qualified hazardous waste collector, as per Ministry of the Environment guidelines.
The risk management plan shall be established within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.5.3-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and are therefore prohibited from becoming established in James W. King IPZ-1:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms or litres of pesticide containing MCPA or Mecoprop at a facility where it is sold or used for application at other sites, except where it is manufactured or processed
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of more than 5,000 tonnes of road salt in a manner that may result in its exposure to precipitation or runoff from precipitation or snow melt
at or above-grade snow storage that is more than 1 hectare. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.5.4-CW |
The following activities, where they would be significant drinking water threats, are included in Section 59 designations under the Clean Water Act for the James W. King Intake Protection Zone as follows:
All land uses except residential are designated in IPZ-1 for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the handling and storage of pesticides
the storage of agricultural source material
the handling and storage of road salt
the storage of snow
the storage of hazardous wastes at waste disposal sites.
All land uses except residential are designated in IPZ-2 for:
the application of agricultural source material to land
the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
the storage of agricultural source material. |
Cataraqui |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.6.1-NB |
The City of Kingston should implement the program and policy recommendations of the Pollution Control Plan Update for the City of Kingston (July 2010) and the Sewage Infrastructure Master Plan for the City of Kingston Urban Area (September 2010), particularly to continue work to separate the downtown combined sewers, as these actions would help protect the quality of Kingston Central's source water where combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water is a moderate or low drinking water threat. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.6.2-NB |
The Ministry of Transportation (MTO) should update its Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan for the Wolfe Island Ferry such that MTO will automatically contact the operators of the King Street (Kingston Central) and Kingston West (Point Pleasant) Water Treatment Plants in the event of an emergency, a spill, as defined by section 91 of the Environmental Protection Act, or an unauthorized discharge where the local transportation of specified substances would be a low drinking water threat.
This update should occur within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Low |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
7.7.1-HR |
Loyalist Township should require proponents to incorporate stormwater management features in accordance with best practices and that provides enhanced protection (i.e., 80 per cent suspended solids removal), into building and site plans that reduce the volume of sediments and contaminants entering storm sewer systems and roadside ditches draining to Bath IPZ-1 or IPZ-2, where discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond is a moderate or low drinking water threat.
In addition to the municipal official plan, the requirement identified in a. should be reflected in the site plan control bylaw and any development guideline documents. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
7.7.2-NB |
a. Loyalist Township should determine the cause of increased sedimentation at the Bath water treatment plant by evaluating a series of samples along watercourses and storm sewers in Bath IPZ-1 and IPZ-2.
b. The Township should then work with landowners of properties in Bath IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 to reduce incidents and volumes of sedimentation. Sediment can carry contaminants associated with activities that are moderate or low drinking water threats such as the application of agricultural or non-agricultural source material, commercial fertilizer and pesticide to land, as well as the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard and waste disposal sites.
c. Some actions that may be appropriate include establishing vegetative buffers along the creek, fencing out livestock, and installing catch basins and settling ponds for tile drainage and stormwater runoff.
d. A strategy to implement the action outlined in a. should be developed within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Cataraqui |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
8-1-E&F |
The existing and future application of commercial fertilizer for non-agricultural uses is prohibited in WHPA A where it could be significant and is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Deloro, Madoc, Tweed, Peats Point and Point Anne.
Tools: Pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
8-2-E&F |
The existing and future application of commercial fertilizer for non-agricultural uses, where it could be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore requires a risk management plan. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the application of commercial fertilizer in the applicable areas. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) Soil testing requirements to determine fertilizer application rates;
2) Best management practices for the application of commercial fertilizers;
3) Consideration of the use of slow release fertilizers;
4) Consideration of naturalizing land outside of play areas and increasing buffer zones along water courses;
5) Requirement for records for fertilizer applications be maintained;
6) Requirements for appropriate training of personnel in relevant best management practices, spill response etc.;
7) Requirements for any other measure deemed necessary to reduce the risk of a chemical release to the environment;
8) The timing of plan implementation;
9) Monitoring and reporting;
10) A provision in reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating that the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) WHPA B (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
b) IPZ 1 and 2 (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Belleville (IPZ 1), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Napanee (IPZ 1) and Point Anne (IPZ 1).
Note that in these areas this policy is applicable to commercial use of fertilizers in parks, sports fields, golf courses etc. but not residential properties.
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 2 years for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
8-3-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where the application of commercial fertilizer for non-agricultural uses are prohibited (Policy 8-1-E & F) or require risk management plans (Policy 8-2-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Prohibition:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
b) Risk Management Plans:
WHPA B * (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
IPZ 1 and 2 * (vulnerability score of 9 or greater) - Belleville (IPZ 1), Picton (IPZ 1 and 2), Deseronto (IPZ 1), Ameliasburgh (IPZ 1), Napanee (IPZ 1) and Point Anne (IPZ 1).
*Excluding residential use.
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
9-1-F |
The future storage of commercial fertilizer (greater than 2,500 kilograms or 2,500 litres; Nitrogen and Phosphorus) for non-agricultural uses is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited in vulnerable areas where it would be significant.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA A and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
Tools: Prohibition pursuant to Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List G)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
9-2-E&F |
The existing and future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer (greater than 2,500 kilograms or 2,500 litres; Nitrogen and Phosphorus) for non-agricultural uses is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore requires a risk management plan where it could be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management official shall establish a risk management plan for the storage and handling of commercial fertilizer in the applicable areas. The risk management plan shall contain, as a minimum:
1) Adequate measures for storage safety including proper storage facilities, leak detection and containments;
2) An emergency contingency plan;
3) Requirements for appropriate training of any personnel handling or storing commercial fertilizer;
4) Requirements for any other measure deemed necessary to reduce the risk of a release to the environment;
5) The timing of plan implementation;
6) Monitoring and reporting;
7) A provision in reference to Section 60 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 indicating that the Plan may not be transferred to another person without the written consent of the risk management official.
Implementer: Risk Management Official - Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Existing Fertilizer Storage
WHPA A, B, and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
b) Future Fertilizer Storage
WHPA B (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
Tools: Risk Management Plan pursuant to Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List H)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect for future activities and within 1 year for existing activities.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The risk management official shall submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing the mandatory requirements for the previous calendar year, as specified in Section 65 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
9-3-E&F |
To assist the municipality with identifying areas where the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer for non-agricultural uses is prohibited (Policy 9-1-F) or require risk management plans (Policy 9-2-E & F), all land uses in the applicable areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land use) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
a) Prohibition:
WHPA A and IPZ 1 (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point, Point Anne, Picton and Ameliasburgh.
b) Risk Management Plan:
Existing Fertilizer Storage:
WHPA A (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
Existing and Future Fertilizer Storage:
WHPA B (vulnerability score of 10) - Madoc, Tweed, Deloro, Peats Point and Point Anne.
Tools: Restricted Land Use pursuant to Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Must Conform (See Appendix C, List A and I)
Effective Date: The policy will be implemented when the Plan takes effect. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next five year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F):
The municipality shall submit an annual report to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st summarizing the actions it has taken to implement the policy. |
Quinte |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
A-1 |
Applicable Activities: Any of the following activities is an existing significant drinking water threat (see Table 4.6):
a) The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
b) The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land;
c) The handling and storage of pesticide; and
d) The application of pesticide to land, where the activity does not require a Pesticide Permit under the Pesticides Act.
e) Any of the following activities where the activity does not require a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002:
i) The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
ii) The application of agricultural source material to land;
iii) The storage of agricultural source material; and
iv) The use of land as an outdoor confinement area, or a farm animal yard.
A-1(1): The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8.
A-1(2): The risk management plan required by (1) will be developed in consideration of the requirements of any applicable Prescribed Instrument, as appropriate.
A-1(3): The risk management plan required by (1) for the handling and storage of pesticide will ensure that any pesticide storage within the mandate of the Agrichemical Warehousing Standards Association obtains certification from that organization, and that documentation of the certification is provided to the Risk Management Official. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
A-2 |
Applicable Activities: Any of the following activities is an existing significant drinking water threat (see Table 4-4) and requires a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002:
a) the application of commercial fertilizer to land;
b) the application of agricultural source material to land;
c) the storage of agricultural source material; and
d) the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard.
A-2(1): Prioritize the review and inspection of properties located in the Trent source protection areas with Nutrient Management Plans or Strategies within one year.
A-2(2): The following content is recommended to be included in the report required by Policy G-2(2):
a) A summary of the prioritization exercise completed for (1).
A-2(3): Following the prioritization developed under (1), review all existing Nutrient Management Plans or Strategies related to these activities to determine if they are adequate to ensure that the associated activities are not significant drinking water threats. If they are deemed to be inadequate for this purpose, they will be amended to include additional conditions that will ensure that the activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. All amendments required by this policy must be completed within three years from the date that the Plan takes effect or such other date as the applicable Director determines based on a prioritized review of Prescribed Instruments that govern the activity.
A-2(4): Following the prioritization developed under (1), and allowing for any implementation schedules set out within the amendments completed under (3), initiate inspections of properties with Nutrient Management Plans or Strategies for compliance with these documents within three years.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
A-3 |
Applicable Activities: The application of pesticide to land is an existing significant drinking water threat (see Table 4.6) and the activity requires a Pesticide Permit under the Pesticides Act.
*In addition to the coloured areas shown above, this policy also applies in the yellow-coloured area on the Frankford policy applicability map for the application of pesticide on an area greater than 10 hectares that may result in the presence of MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid) in groundwater or surface water.
A-3: Review all existing Pesticide Permits related to the activity to determine if they are adequate to ensure that the associated activities are not significant drinking water threats. If they are deemed to be inadequate for this purpose, they will be amended to include additional conditions that will ensure that the activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. All amendments required by this policy must be carried out within three years from the date that the plan takes effect or such other date as the applicable Director determines based on a prioritized review of Prescribed Instruments that govern the activity. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
A-4 |
Applicable Activities: Any of the following activities that would be a future significant drinking water threat (see Table 4.6):
a) The application of agricultural source material to land;
b) The storage of agricultural source material;
c) The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
d) The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
e) The application of pesticide to land;
f) The handling and storage of pesticide; and
g) The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard.
A-4(1): In a WHPA-A or IPZ-1[1], the activity is prohibited and designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
A-4(2): The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8.
A-4(3): The risk management plan required by Policy A-4(2) will be developed in consideration of the requirements of any applicable Prescribed Instrument, as appropriate.
A-4(4): In a WHPA-A or IPZ-11, and where a Prescribed Instrument is required, future occurrences of the activity are not permitted.
[1] Consult the Trent Assessment Report for maps of wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.1, C.9.1 |
Within Wellhead Protection Area A, any existing or future ASM or NASM application or storage where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 as prohibited. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) the Agricultural Source Materials (ASM )application and storage in any quantity
b) the Non-Agricultural Source Materials (NASM) application and storage in any quantity
As per Section 57 (2) of the Act, where this policy applies to existing activities, the prohibition of those activities shall not take effect until 180 days after the plan takes effect. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.2, C.9.2 |
Within Wellhead Protection Area B, where the vulnerability score is 10, any existing or future application of ASM or NASM where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) Agricultural Source Materials (ASM) in any quantity,
b) the application of Non-agricultural Source Materials (NASM) where either:
i. the material is removed from a meat plant or sewage works or
ii. the livestock density (according to livestock density mapping) is greater than 1 nutrient unit / acre, or
iii. the percentage of managed land is greater than 80%.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. The RMP should also, at a minimum, set out guidelines for enhanced inspections. Enhanced inspections are considered additional inspections during periods of higher risk, such as during the spring when runoff from manure can potentially create a higher risk for contamination. Prescribed Instruments such as Nutrient Management Strategies, Nutrient Management Plans or NASM Plans are expected to form the basis of the Risk Management Plan. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.3, C.9.3 |
Within Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability score is 10, any existing storage of ASM or NASM where it is a significant threat is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) Agricultural Source Materials (ASM) in any quantity,
b) Non-Agricultural Source Materials (NASM) where either:
i. the storage is at or above grade and the mass of nitrogen is greater than 5 tonnes, or
ii. the storage is in a permanent nutrient storage facility below grade or partially above grade where the mass of nitrogen is at least 0.5 tonnes, or
iii. the NASM being stored contains material generated by a meat plant
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. Prescribed Instruments such as Nutrient Management Strategies, Nutrient Management Plans or NASM Plans are expected to form the basis of the Risk Management Plan. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.4, C.9.4 |
For those lands located within a Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability score is 10, any ASM or NASM storage where it would be a significant drinking water threat (future), is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
a) the storage of Agricultural Source Materials (ASM) in any quantity,
b) the storage of Non-agricultural Source Materials(NASM) where either:
i. the storage is at or above grade and the mass of nitrogen is greater than 5 tonnes, or
ii. the storage is in a permanent nutrient storage facility below grade or partially above grade where the mass of nitrogen is at least 0.5 tonnes, or
iii. the NASM being stored contains material generated by a meat plant. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.5, C.9.5 |
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, any existing or future commercial fertilizer or pesticide application where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) the application of commercial fertilizers where either
i. the livestock density (according to livestock density mapping) is greater than 1.0 nutrient unit/acre or
ii. the percentage of managed land is greater than 80%.
b) the application of pesticides to an area of land greater than 1 hectare resulting in the presence of chemicals listed in the MOE Table of Circumstances.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. Prescribed Instruments such as Nutrient Management Strategies or Nutrient Management Plans are expected to form the basis of the Risk Management Plan. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.6, C.9.6 |
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, any existing commercial fertilizer or pesticide storage where it is a significant drinking water threat is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) the storage of commercial fertilizers where the mass of materials, in any form, is greater than 2,500 kilograms
b) the storage of pesticides for retail sale or extermination and the mass of materials is greater than 250 kilograms or
c) the storage of pesticides where they are manufactured, processed or wholesaled and the mass of materials is greater than 2500 kilograms.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. Prescribed Instruments such as Nutrient Management Strategies or Nutrient Management Plans are expected to form the basis of the Risk Management Plan. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.7, C.9.7 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, any commercial fertilizer or pesticide storage where it would be a significant drinking water threat (future), is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
a) the storage of commercial fertilizers where the mass of materials, in any form, is greater than 2,500 kilograms
b) the storage of pesticides for retail sale or extermination and the mass of materials is greater than 250 kilograms or
c) the storage of pesticides where manufactured, processed or wholesaled and the mass of materials is greater than 2500 kilograms. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.8, C.9.8 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities, in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, and apply or store ASM, NASM, commercial fertilizer or pesticide where it is a significant drinking water threat. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) agricultural source material (ASM) in any quantity
b) non-agricultural source material (NASM) where either:
i. the storage is at or above grade and the mass of nitrogen is greater than 5 tonnes or
ii. the storage is in a permanent nutrient storage facility below grade or partially above grade where the mass of nitrogen is at least 0.5 tonnes or
iii. the NASM being stored contains material generated by a meat plant or
iv. the NASM being applied contains material generated by a meat plant or sewage works
v. the livestock density (according to livestock density mapping) is sufficient to annually apply the NASM at a rate greater than 1.0 nutrient unit per acre or
vi. the application area has a managed lands percentage of greater than 80%
c) commercial fertilizer where either:
i. it is stored for retail sale or application in quantities in excess of 2500kg or
ii. the livestock density (according to livestock density mapping) is greater than 1 nutrient unit per acre or
iii. the percentage of managed land is greater than 80%
d) pesticides where either:
i. it is used for the purposes of extermination and is stored in quantities greater than 250 kg or
ii. it is applied on lands greater than 1 ha.
The outreach and education program is intended to inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
A.9.9, C.9.9 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities, in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction who are located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, and apply or store pesticides where it is a moderate or low drinking water threat. The outreach and education program is intended to inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ADMIN-1-LB |
All land uses identified within the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act if they are located within -Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 10; or -Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10.
Within these designated land use categories and areas, a notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with Section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act shall be required prior to approval of any Planning Act application (as prescribed in Ontario Regulation 287/07 section 62) or Building Permit application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purposes of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the building official that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act will not be engaged in. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ADMIN-2-LB |
All land uses, with the exception of solely residential land uses, identified within the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act if they are located within:
Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 8, 8.1 or 9; or
Wellhead Protection Areas B; or ""C ; with a vulnerability score of 4, 6 or 8.
Within these designated land use categories and areas, a notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with Section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act shall be required prior to approval of any Planning Act application (as prescribed in Ontario Regulation 287/07 section 62) or Building Permit application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purposes of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the building official that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act will not be engaged in. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ADMIN-3-LB |
Where this Source Protection Plan specifies that Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act apply (see Appendix A, List A), the municipality shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws to conform with significant threat policies in this Source Protection Plan. Official Plans must be updated no later than the date of their next 5-year review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ADMIN-4-LB |
A drinking water threat activity that is established or commences after the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect is considered existing and is subject to policies addressing existing activities when:
The activity is related to a development proposal where an application was made or an approval was obtained under the Planning Act or the Condominium Act on a date before the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect. (Note that the activity would also be considered ""existing ; with respect to any further applications under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, or Prescribed Instruments required to implement the development proposal).
The activity is related to an application made or an approval was obtained under the Building Code Act on a date before the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect.
The activity is related to an application made or an approval was obtained for the issuance or amendment of a Prescribed Instrument on a date before the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ADMIN-5-LB |
A drinking water threat activity that resumes after an interruption or expands after the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect is considered existing and is subject to policies addressing existing activities when:
It is usually occurring on the property but has been interrupted for a maximum of 24 months due to temporary circumstances such as fire, renovation, change of ownership or due to the seasonal nature of the activity
It involves an expansion of an existing activity but the expanded activity would be more protective of drinking water sources
It involves an expansion of the existing physical space but does not result in an expansion of the existing activity (unless the expansion of the activity is more protective of drinking water sources)
It involves an expansion of the existing activity that is minor such that:
it does not require regulatory or planning approvals; and
it is not part of, or was not preceded by, an expansion of the physical space that required regulatory or planning approvals. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
AG-1 |
Where the following activities are or could be an existing or future significant threat, the threat shall be managed though the Nutrient Management Act, 2002 (as amended):
storage and application of agricultural source material;
the handling, storage, and application of non-agricultural source material;
the use of land for an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard; and
the application of commercial fertilizer to land.
The Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs will work with farmers to review existing and future Nutrient Management Plans, Strategies, and Non-Agricultural Source Material Plans to ensure that they contain best management practices to ensure that agricultural activities are not, or do not, become a significant drinking water threat. Instruments that exist before the day the Source Protection Plan takes effect must be reviewed and, if necessary, amended within three years.
Note: Additional policies apply. See MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
AG-2 |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (Risk Management Plan), where the activity is or could be a significant drinking water threat for activities that are not subject to the requirements of the Nutrient Management Act, 2002 (as amended):
the storage and application of agricultural source material (ASM);
the use of land for livestock grazing/pasturing or outdoor confinement area/farm-animal yard; and
the handling, storage, and application of commercial fertilizer.
The Risk Management Plan will be based upon the same principles as the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy or Environmental Farm Plan. The Risk Management Plan will include these conditions where appropriate:
Requiring soil samples be done at least once every five years (the default value of 101 ppm of plant available phosphorus and 251 ppm of plant available potassium can be used in place of the first soil test)
Based on soil samples, fertilizer and ASM shall be used at the appropriate rates
Requiring the establishment of minimum vegetative buffers from surface water
Requiring structural or management alterations needed to meet current best management practices (i.e. nutrient management standards for runoff)
No ASM or fertilizer shall be spread within the WHPA-A (100 m around the wellhead)
Risk Management Plans or voluntary Nutrient Management Plans/Strategies prepared by a person certified by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs under the Nutrient Management Act which meet the expectations of Section 58 (15) of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and Source Protection Plan shall be accepted by the Risk Management Official.
Note: Additional policies apply. See MONITORING-1, GENERAL-5, and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
Ag1EF-EO |
The City of Greater Sudbury and the Municipality of Markstay-Warren shall create and deliver an education and outreach program to all of the vulnerable areas where the following threats could be significant:
Application to land and storage of agricultural source material;
Use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard;
Application to land and handling and storage of non-agricultural source material; and
Application to land and handling and storage of commercial fertilizer.
The education and outreach program may include, but is not limited to, the following:
Descriptions of the threat activities and why they pose a risk to drinking water;
Source Protection Plan content related to the above threats to inform residents of the new restrictions in effect and the location of the vulnerable areas; and
The proper application of commercial fertilizers and best management practices.
Monitoring policy M4 applies |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
Ag2F-s57 |
The following threats are prohibited and therefore designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where they could be significant within the City of Greater Sudbury:
Application to land and storage of agricultural source material (future);
Use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard (future); and
Application to land and handling and storage of non-agricultural source material (future).
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the above listed threats would be significant.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
Ag3E-RMP |
The following threats are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act requiring Risk Management Plans where they could be significant:
Application to land and storage of agricultural source material (existing);
Use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard (existing);
Application to land and handling and storage of non-agricultural source material (existing); and
Handling and storage of commercial fertilizer (existing and future)
In the Ramsey Lake Issue Contributing Area, section 58 risk management plans are required where 2,500 kg and greater of commercial fertilizer is stored. Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the above listed threats could be significant.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
Ag4EF-RMP |
Where it could be a significant threat within the City of Greater Sudbury, the application to land of commercial fertilizer (existing and future) is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans. In the Ramsey Lake Issue Contributing Area, this policy applies only to those properties that have a minimum of 1 hectare of land to which commercial fertilizer could be applied. Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 restricted land uses under the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the application of commercial fertilizer (existing and future) could be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
AIR1 |
Prior to the installation or operation of any de-icing facility to be located where the threat could be significant, the airport authority/operator should have in place an appropriate glycol management plan. Said plan should manage the risk posed by runoff from de-icing operations or a spill. The authority/operator should also have in place an emergency response plan to ensure continued protection of the environment in the event of an emergency.
Where the operator/authority is a Municipality, the Municipality shall comply with this policy.
The airport authority/operator should provide notice to the Source Protection Authority when a glycol management plan has been prepared in the areas where this policy applies. This policy shall come into effect on the effective date of the Source Protection Plan and shall apply in the following vulnerable areas:
Callander IPZ-1;
* Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1;
* South River IPZ-1. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
AirD1EF-EO |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall inform regulating authorities, including the airport authority or operator, of the vulnerable areas where runoff containing de-icing materials from a regional or national airport would be a significant threat. This education and outreach policy requires a one-time communication - it is not an ongoing, annual requirement.
Monitoring policy M16 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
All IPZ s (E&O) |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority will initiate and lead Education and Outreach when the Source Protection Plan takes effect, by building on existing Education and Outreach programs to promote best management practices to protect drinking water sources for moderate and low drinking water threats. Implementation will be conditional on availability of funding.
The E & O will be targeted for implementation within three to five years after the Plan takes effect, and will continue as needed based on a review at that time.
The above applies to the existing and future, moderate and low, various threats (listed below) in all IPZs within the Essex Region Source
Protection Area:
The handling and storage of road salt
The storage of snow
The handling and storage of fuel
Waste disposal sites
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects,
stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid
The handling and storage of an organic solvent
The application of pesticide to land
The handling and storage of pesticide
The application of commercial fertilizer to land
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
The application of agricultural source material to land
The storage of agricultural source material
The management of agricultural source material
The application of non-agricultural source material to land
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
|
Essex |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
All IPZs, HVAs, SGRAs, Wells –1 (Stewardship/Incentive) |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority (ERCA) will apply for funding assistance from the Ministry of the Environment, when the Source Protection Plan takes effect, in order to undertake a stewardship and incentive program, funded by the Province, to encourage the use of risk mitigation practices and assist with the implementation costs of these practices for moderate and low threats to drinking water sources.
Implementation will be conditional on availability of funding.
The above applies to the existing and future, moderate and low, various threats (listed below) in all IPZs, HVAs and SGRAs and rural areas with
private wells in the Essex Region Source Protection Area:
The handling and storage of road salt
The storage of snow
The handling and storage of fuel
Waste disposal sites
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects,
stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid
The handling and storage of an organic solvent
The application of pesticide to land
The handling and storage of pesticide
The application of commercial fertilizer to land
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
The application of agricultural source material to land
The storage of agricultural source material
The management of agricultural source material
The application of non-agricultural source material to land
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material. |
Essex |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
All123-handlestorefuel-1 (Clean Water Act) |
Commercial, Agricultural and Industrial land uses identified within the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws where the policies of the Source Protection Plan indicate the handling and storage of fuel in quantities described above are subject to Section 57 or Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses, with the exception of residential uses. Within these designated land uses and areas, a written notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with Section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit or Planning Act application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the circumstances under which a Planning Act Approval Authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the Planning Act Approval Authority or building official, as the case may be, is satisfied that:
The application complies with the circumstances specified in the written direction from the Risk Management Official; and
The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
All123-transportcorridor-1(Specify Action) |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority (ERCA) will provide information on drinking water threats (the transportation of various quantities of organic solvents, dense non-aqueous phase liquids, fuels, pesticides/herbicides and fertilizers) and vulnerable areas (through maps) to various parties and organizations, and encourage them to include this information in their spills response, prevention and/or emergency plans.
The various parties and organizations include municipalities (various departments), Ministry of Transportation Ontario (MTO), Ministry of Environment (MOE), Hazmat, Environment Canada, railways, Transport Canada, Chemistry Industry Association of Canada, Regional Environmental Emergencies Team (REET), Canadian Coast Guard, Port Authorities, harbours/marinas, ferry operators, Ambassador Bridge authority, local distributors and dispatchers, Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) and other emergency responders. Information on the drinking water threats and vulnerable areas may also be sent to other relevant parties and organizations that the ERCA may become aware of. The information will assist in responding to spills (such as reporting and containment), and preventing spills on transportation corridors within the Intake Protection Zones in the Essex Region watershed. The information will be sent by the ERCA to the various parties and organizations within 1(one) year of the date of the approval of the Source Protection Plan.
Further, the ERCA will encourage marinas within or near the Intake Protection Zones to refer to best management practices in the Clean Marine Program related to fuel and other relevant substances, and will encourage marinas to participate in the Clean Marine Program.
These specified actions apply to the existing and future, moderate and low threats of the transportation of organic solvents, dense non-aqueous
phase liquids (DNAPLs), fuels, pesticides/herbicides and fertilizers in the vulnerable areas of:
All IPZ-1s, IPZ-2s and IPZ-3s.
The date of compliance is within 1 (one) year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Essex |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
All123-transportcorridor-3(Specify Action) |
The Ministry of Transportation (MTO), in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standard, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within the Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or within an Intake Protection Zones or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
Municipalities will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the SPAs. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within a Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or an Intake Protection Zone or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
The above policy will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan within each Source Protection Area. This policy, in conjunction with additional education and outreach policies, should be implemented within 2 years after the effective date of the plan. The implementing bodies are MTO, MOE and the municipalities. |
Essex |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
AQUA-1-LB-PI-HR |
Where the use of land or water for aquaculture (existing and/or future) is or would be a moderate drinking water threat as described in Appendix B and requires a Prescribed Instruments (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval or Permit to Take Water under the Ontario Water Resources Act), the MOE shall ensure:
a) Amendments to an existing instrument includes appropriate terms and conditions that address the threat and protect drinking water sources; or
b) The future instrument includes appropriate terms and conditions that address and threat and protect drinking water sources. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Moderate |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
AQUA-2-NLB |
The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources is strongly encouraged to consider the proximity to and potential impact on drinking water sources during their review of applications for future aquaculture facilities subject to approvals under the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act and the aquaculture regulations. This policy applies where the use of land or water for aquaculture is a moderate threat to drinking water (an Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 9 or 10). When approving a location for a new facility, preference should be given to locations outside of these zones. Action to implement this policy should be initiated within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
ASM(APP)-1 |
The existing and future application of agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan for areas outside of WHPA-A and IPZ-1 for those not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, reflect appropriate nutrient management practices, and ensure the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(App)-2 |
Where the Nutrient Management Act does not require an approval, the existing and future application of agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited within WHPA-A and IPZ-1, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(App)-3 |
The existing and future application of agricultural source material to land is prohibited within WHPA-A and IPZ-1, for those phased in under the Nutrient Management Act. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(App)-4 |
Where the existing and future application of agricultural source material to land is in an area where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat outside of WHPA-A or IPZ-1, and the activity requires an approval under the Nutrient Management Act, OMAFRA shall ensure that the nutrient management plan or strategy that governs the application of agricultural source material to land includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(ICA)-1 |
The existing and future storage and application of agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and therefore requires a risk management plan where the vulnerability score is less than 10 and the activities are or would be significant drinking water threats. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, reflect appropriate nutrient management practices, and ensure the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(ICA)-2 |
Where the Nutrient Management Act does not require an approval, the existing and future storage and application of agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the vulnerability score is 10, and the activities would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(ICA)-3 |
Where the existing and future storage and application of agricultural source material to land is in an area where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat and the vulnerability score is less than 10, and the activity requires an approval under the Nutrient Management Act, OMAFRA shall ensure that the nutrient management plan or strategy that governs the storage and application of agricultural source material to land incorporates terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(ICA)-4 |
The existing and future storage and application of agricultural source material to land is prohibited where the vulnerability score is 10 and the activities would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(STORE)-1 |
The existing storage of agricultural source material is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan for those not phased in under the nutrient management act, where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, reflect appropriate nutrient management practices, and ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(Store)-2 |
Where the Nutrient Management Act does not require an approval, the future storage of agricultural source material is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(Store)-3 |
Where the existing storage of agricultural source material is in an area where the activity is a significant drinking water threat, and the activity requires an approval under the Nutrient Management Act, OMAFRA shall ensure that the nutrient management plan or strategy that governs the storage of agricultural source material to land includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
ASM(Store)-4 |
The future storage of agricultural source material is prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
ASM-1 |
See ASM-1-b (Policy Database ID 4717) for Part 2 of this policy.
1) The application of ASM to land shall be prohibited where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Pathogens (future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) Where the application of ASM to land is in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat. In addition to any other risk management measures required through the Prescribed Instrument, the Prescribed Instrument shall as a minimum ensure:
a) the application of ASM is not applied during restricted periods, or any other time when the soil is snow covered or frozen consistent with the limitations of subsection 52.2 - 52.4 of Ontario Regulation 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002 to avoid runoff; and
b) soil testing is required for plant available nitrogen each year prior to application of ASM to determine appropriate application rates, in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Pathogens (existing); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timeline:
T-2: Prescribed Instruments (existing), where prohibited, shall not be renewed when the current Prescribed Instrument expires, and the significant threat activity to which the Prescribed Instrument pertains, shall cease no later than 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
ASM-1-LB-PI-MC |
Where the land application or storage of agricultural source material (existing and/or future) that is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B is governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Nutrient Management Strategy or Plan developed under General Regulation 267/03 of the Nutrient Management Act), this activity shall continue to be managed through these existing requirements. The existing regulatory requirements administered by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and the corresponding compliance program enforced by the MOE already manage this activity so that it is not a significant threat to drinking water. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
ASM-2 |
For farms that do not require a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy, where the application of ASM is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The application of ASM is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Pathogens (future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) The application of ASM is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be significant. In addition to any other risk management measures required through the risk management plan, the risk management plan shall as a minimum ensure:
a) the application of ASM is not applied during restricted periods, or any other time when the soil is snow covered or frozen consistent with the limitations of subsection 52.2 - 52.4 of Ontario Regulation 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002 to avoid runoff; and
b) soil testing is required for plant available nitrogen each year prior to application of ASM to determine appropriate application rates, in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Pathogens (existing); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-4: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act as prohibited, shall be prohibited by the Risk Management Official within 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect as per s. 57(2) under the Clean Water Act, unless otherwise specified within the policy.
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
ASM-2-LB-S58 |
The existing or future land application or storage of agricultural source material is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is or would be significant as described in Appendix B. The Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. This policy does not apply to:
Small, non-intensive farms where the number of farm animals is not sufficient to generate five or more nutrient units of manure annually and the concentration is less than one nutrient unit per acre of cropland
Activities that are governed by Nutrient Management Strategies or Nutrient Management Plans developed under the Nutrient Management Act.
Residential use of agricultural source material such as bagged manure applied to gardens |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
ASM-3 |
1) The storage of ASM shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) Where the storage of ASM is in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
ASM-4 |
For farms that do not require a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy, where the storage of ASM would be a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The storage of ASM is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) The storage of ASM is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
ASM-5 |
The management of ASM (aquaculture) shall be prohibited where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in the following areas:
- An Issue Contributing Area for Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-2: Prescribed Instruments (existing), where prohibited, shall not be renewed when the current Prescribed Instrument expires, and the significant threat activity to which the Prescribed Instrument pertains, shall cease no later than 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set out by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan or amendment took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date the notice is given;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding restricted land uses shall come into effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan comes into effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the County and/or the Source Protection Authority to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan comes into effect;
e. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location immediately before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan or amendment comes into effect;
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Official Plan must be amended and adopted by council to conform with the significant threat policies within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan comes into effect or the next Official Plan review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and the Zoning By-law within two (2) years from adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-1.18 |
To address Conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the County shall:
a. Continue to support environmental investigation, remediation and redevelopment through the incentives provided through the Community Improvement Plans; and
b. Implement an education program on drinking water issues associated with contaminated sites including the protection of drinking water sources and the use of the Record of Site Condition process as a best management practice to address Condition sites. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-1.2 |
Despite the definition of existing, for the purposes of this Plan, where one or more of the following:
A complete application for development under the Planning Act or Condominium Act;
An application for Environmental Compliance Approval; or
An application for a Building Permit.
has been received by the applicable implementing body prior to the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect a related significant drinking water threat shall be permitted subject to the policies pertaining to existing significant drinking water threats. Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, the above noted transition policies shall no longer apply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-1.21 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to
refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any
subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also
applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province
or the municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-1.3 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Section 57 or Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official is required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act (as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07 Section 62), or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purpose of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the building official, as the case may be, that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-1.5 |
The County, in collaboration with Conservation Authorities and other bodies wherever
possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs directed at any,
or all, significant drinking water threats where such programs are deemed necessary
and/or appropriate by the County. Such programs may include, but not necessarily be
limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of significant drinking water threats
and promotion of best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-1.6 |
The County, in collaboration with other bodies and levels of government wherever
possible, may develop and implement incentive programs directed at various significant
drinking water threats where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate
by the County, subject to available funding. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-10.1 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-10.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of an organic solvent never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat; this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-11.1 |
To ensure any new airport where there could be runoff containing de-icing chemicals, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-12.2 |
To reduce the risk to drinking water from the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. The Risk Management Plan may include, but not be limited to, the following:
a. Evaluation of existing Spills Prevention Plans/ Spill Contingency Plans;
b. An evaluation of communication plans and training protocols with respect to management of a spill;
c. Additional measures to reduce the likelihood that a spill or leak would be a risk to drinking water sources; and
d. Ensure all applicable provisions of Ontario Regulations O. Reg. 210/01
e. Ensure the protection of drinking water sources by including the following;
i. Best Management Practices for spill management;
ii. proof of ability to pay for clean-up of potential contamination; and
iii. the appropriate frequency of inspections. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-13.4 |
To ensure that any future consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the County of Brant will update the Paris Master Servicing Plan using the findings from the Whiteman’s Creek Tier 3 Water Budget, and in addition, complete a Paris (Paris/Bethel) Settlement Area Well Capacity Study to be used to support future growth management. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-13.5 |
To ensure that any future consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the County of Brant will:
a. expand the Tier 3 model to include the Paris Settlement Area;
b. undertake a comprehensive Paris/Bethel Well Capacity Study, inclusive of scenarios consistent with potential growth target;.
c. incorporate the sustainable water quantity capacity into the overall growth management strategy for Paris and Bethel Wells.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-13.6 |
To ensure that any existing or future consumptive water takings within the WHPA-Q ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the County of Brant will request the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks support the ongoing maintenance of the Whitemans Creek Tier 3 Water Budget model and expansion of the model to include the Paris Wells. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-13.7 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water takings within the WHPA-Q ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the County of Brant will update their water conservation plans using the findings from the Whitemans Creek Tier 3 Water Budget and Risk Assessment to support the sustainable use of water in areas serviced by a well located within the WHPA-Q and the serviced settlement area. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-2.2 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval under Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-2.4 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, never becomes a significant drinking water threat (except for the storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous wastes, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste; storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste; or storage of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) waste), where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-2.5 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval and comprises one of the following waste disposal site threat subcategories:
storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste;
storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste; or
storage of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) waste
and where such waste disposal site would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity such that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan may be based on Ministry of the Environment tools and requirements for such activities, as set out in the Environmental Protection Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-2.6 |
The County in collaboration with Conservation Authorities and other bodies wherever
possible, shall develop and implement education and outreach programs for such
activities that involve existing and future establishment, operation or maintenance of a
waste disposal site, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act
within vulnerable areas, that do not require an Environmental Compliance Approval.
The program should focus on the proper handling, storage and disposal of wastes to
ensure that these activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water
threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-3.1 |
To ensure existing or new septic systems and holding tanks, with a design flow of less
than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval under the Ontario
Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act, ceases to be or never becomes
a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant
drinking water threat, the County shall implement an on-site septic system maintenance
inspection program. Inspections should be prioritized based on the proximity to the
drinking water supply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-4.1 |
a. To ensure the following existing significant drinking water threats:
i. The storage of agricultural source material (not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act)
ii. The application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
iii. The application, handling and storage of pesticide
iv. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
within WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), cease to be significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
b. To ensure the following existing significant drinking water threat:
i. The application of agricultural source material (not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act)
within WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan for the storage of agricultural source material will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-4.2 |
To ensure the following significant drinking water threats:
The existing and future application of agricultural source material
The future storage of agricultural source material
The existing and future application and handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
The future handling and storage of pesticide
The future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
within a WHPA-A, ceases to be or never become significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-4.3 |
To ensure the following future significant drinking water threats:
The storage of agricultural source material
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
The handling and storage of pesticide
within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), never become significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-4.4 |
To ensure the following future significant drinking water threats:
The application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
The application of pesticide
within WHPA-A, never become significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-4.5 |
To ensure the following future significant drinking water threats:
The application of agricultural source material (not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act)
The application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
The application of pesticide
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
within WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), never become significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan for the application of agricultural source material will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-4.7 |
To ensure the following existing and future significant drinking water threats:
a. The application and storage of agricultural source material
b. The application, handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
c. The application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
d. The application and storage of pesticide
e. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
within a Nitrate ICA with a vulnerability score of less than 10, or IPZ with a vulnerability
score equal to or greater than eight (8) cease to be or never become significant
drinking water threat, the County shall develop and implement an education and
outreach program targeted to individuals within these vulnerable areas to ensure that
the risk to municipal drinking water sources from these activities is reduced.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-5.1 |
Where a Chloride Issue Contributing Area has been identified, the County of Brant shall
review and, if necessary, revise their Salt Management Plans for the application of salt
on roadways in all Wellhead Protection Areas. The Salt Management Plan shall
include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location reduce
the potential for salt-related surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration and meet
the objectives of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for Environmental
Management of Road Salts including the salt vulnerable area mapping to include areas
where significant threats can occur. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-6.1 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of road salt ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-6.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of road salt within WHPA-A, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-6.3 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of road salt in the following areas never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats within:
a. WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10),
b. Chloride ICA, or
c. IPZ with a vulnerability score of nine (9),
these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-7.1 |
To ensure any existing snow storage in an area greater than 0.01 hectares ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-7.2 |
To ensure any existing snow storage ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat within a Chloride or Nitrate ICA or IPZ with a vulnerability score of nine (9), the County shall encourage best management practices with respect to the handling and storage of snow. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-7.3 |
To ensure any new snow handling and storage in an area greater than 0.01 hectares never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-8.1 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of fuel equal to or less than
2,500 Litres ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where
this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall develop
and implement an education and outreach program outlining requirements for the
proper maintenance of fuel storage tanks and the steps to be taken if there is a spill or
leak detected. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-8.2 |
To ensure the handling and storage of liquid fuel more than 2,500 Litres ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas:
a. existing activities within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10); or
b. future activities within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of ten (10). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-8.3 |
To ensure any future handling and storage of liquid fuel of more than 2,500 Litres never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-9.1 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) for industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural purposes ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), , this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-9.2 |
To ensure any future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) for industrial, commercial institutional and agricultural purposes never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within WHPA- A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-CW-9.3 |
To ensure any existing or new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase
liquid (DNAPL) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall
develop and implement an education and outreach program to encourage the use of
alternative products, where available, and the proper handling/storage and disposal
procedures for these products. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-1.16 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall:
- Ensure that all Prescribed Instruments issued for Condition Sites include terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the risk to drinking water sources is managed. Appropriate conditions may include requirements for source control, remediation to provincial standards, monitoring and Contaminant Management Plans;
- Ensure that Prescribed Instruments include a condition requiring the instrument holder to report on the actions taken and the status of the site to the Ministry of Environment, Source Protection Authority and the municipality on an annual basis; and
- Provide to the County of Brant a copy of the new or revised Prescribed Instrument.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-1.17 |
To address Conditions sites that are significant drinking water threats resulting from past activities, the County shall amend their Official Plan to require that as a component of a complete application under the Planning Act, the completion of the contaminated sites protocol is required, inclusive of the requirement that a record of site condition is to be provided as appropriate. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-1.4 |
The County shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws to:
- Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies as regulated by the Source Protection Plan;
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-13.1 |
To ensure that any existing, increased or new consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the permit to take water for groundwater taking include appropriate terms and conditions to demonstrate that the taking will not adversely impact the aquifer's ability to meet municipal and other water supply requirements. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-13.2 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry in consultation with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, County of Brant and Grand River Conservation Authority, shall review and amend where appropriate any existing and new approvals under the Aggregate Resources Act, 1990 for extraction below the water table. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-13.3 |
When planning for growth and approving development that is to be serviced by an existing municipal well located within a WHPA-Q with a significant risk level, the municipality shall ensure that Planning Act decisions consider the long-term sustainability of the municipal drinking water system by:
a. ensuring the development and any required expansion of the municipal drinking water system is consistent with the County of Brant’s Water Supply Master Plan and Infrastructure Master Plan;
b. consulting with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks to discuss any necessary amendments to the Permit to Take Water.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-14.1 |
To ensure that any future activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer within the WHPA-Q never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the relevant Planning Approval Authority shall:
a. Require new development for lands zoned Low Density Residential or zoned Agricultural to implement best management practices such as Low Impact Development (LID) with the goal to maintain pre-development recharge.
b. Require that all site plan (excluding an application for one single family dwelling) and subdivision applications for new residential, commercial, industrial and institutional uses provide a water balance assessment for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Planning Approval Authority which addresses each of the following requirements:
i. Maintain pre-development recharge to the greatest extent feasible through best management practices such as LID, minimizing impervious surfaces, and lot level infiltration;
ii. Where pre-development recharge cannot be maintained on site, implement and maximize off-site recharge enhancement (within the same WHPA-Q) to compensate for any predicted loss of recharge from the development; and
iii. For new development (excluding a minor variance) within the WHPA-Q and within an Issue Contributing Area (for sodium, chloride or nitrates), the water balance assessment must consider water quality when recommending best management practices and address how recharge will be maintained and water quality will be protected.
c. Only approve settlement area expansions as part of a municipal comprehensive review where it has been demonstrated that recharge functions will be maintained on lands designated Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas within WHPA-Q.
d. Amend municipal planning documents to reference most current Assessment Reports in regards to the Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas within WHPA-Q.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-2.1 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall review, and if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, ensure that the waste disposal site is managed to reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-2.3 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-3.2 |
To ensure existing or future septic system, with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall prepare or review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that these septic systems are managed to reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources.
The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years, and upgrading of these septic systems to current standards, if necessary. In addition, the terms and conditions may include the proponent/applicant to provide annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority and County of any monitoring and inspection programs required and their results. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-3.3 |
To ensure any existing or new sewage treatment plant with effluent discharge, or any existing or new sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water, or any existing or new sewage treatment plant with sewage storage tanks cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are, or would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources. The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, requirements for regular maintenance and inspections conducted by the proponent. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-3.4 |
To ensure any existing or new sanitary sewer and pipes where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources. The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, requirements for regular maintenance and inspections conducted by the proponent. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-3.5 |
To ensure any existing or new stormwater management facility that discharges stormwater ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions (for example, regular maintenance) that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-3.6 |
To ensure any existing or new combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-3.7 |
To ensure any existing or new industrial effluent discharge to surface water ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources. The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, requirements for regular maintenance and inspections conducted by the proponent. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-4.6 |
To ensure:
the existing storage of agricultural source material on lands phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10); or,
the future application of agricultural source material on lands phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10),
cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend the Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy to ensure that such Plan/Strategy incorporates appropriate measures and/or terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that the activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-4.8 |
To ensure the existing and future application of non-agricultural source material to lands located within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or Ministry of the Environment, as applicable, shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend a Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or an Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure that such Plans/Compliance Approvals incorporate appropriate measures and/or terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-4.9 |
Notwithstanding policy BC-CW-4.2, to ensure any existing handling and storage of non-agricultural source material within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or Ministry of the Environment, as applicable, shall review and, if necessary, amend any existing Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or Environmental Compliance Approvals, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure that such Plans/Compliance Approvals incorporate appropriate measures and/or terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-MC-5.2 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water due to the future application of road salt where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the County shall include policies in their Official Plan requiring all new development in vulnerable areas to provide salt impact assessments as part of a complete application for development which includes new roads and parking lots.
Such assessments should include but not be limited to mitigation measures regarding design of parking lots, roads and sidewalks to minimize the need for repeat application of road salt such as designing ponding of parking areas with the goal of reducing salt use; directing stormwater discharge outside of vulnerable areas where possible; and provisions to hire certified contractors. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BC-NB-1.19 |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a WHPA or IPZ along highways, or railway lines:
The County is requested to incorporate the location of WHPAs and IPZs into their emergency response plans in order to protect drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways or rail lines; and
The Ministry of the Environment is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-NB-1.20 |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the County is requested to support ongoing programs, which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903, within all vulnerable areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-NB-1.7 |
The Ministry of Environment and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support for incentive programs to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program and Rural Water Quality Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-NB-1.8 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from an existing activity, where this activity is a
significant drinking water threat, the Grand River Conservation Authority, in consultation
with the County, will deliver available cost share incentive programs as long as the Grand
River Conservation Authority has such programs and outreach staff available, and work
with affected land owners to implement best management practices for the following
activities:
a. The application of agricultural source material to land;
b. The storage of agricultural source material; and,
c. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BC-NB-12.1 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act , where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Canada Energy Regulator Ontario Energy Board, and the pipeline proponent are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the County the location of any new proposed pipeline within the County and/or Source Protection Area.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BE-CW-2.1 |
To ensure that these activities never become significant drinking water threats, the following future activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore PROHIBITED where they would be a significant drinking water threat in the Belmont Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) 'A':
The application of agricultural source material to land;
The storage of agricultural source material;
The application of non-agricultural source material to land;
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material;
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
The application of pesticide to land;
The handling and storage of pesticide;
The handling and storage of road salt;
The storage of snow;
The handling and storage of fuel;
The handling and storage of an organic solvent;
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area of a farm-animal yard; and
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act where a Prescribed Instrument is not required.
|
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BE-CW-2.2 |
To ensure that this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquid is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, and is therefore PROHIBITED in the Municipality of Central Elgin, Malahide Township and the Municipality of Thames Centre where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat in the Belmont Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) 'A', 'B' and 'C'. |
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BE-CW-4.1 |
The Municipality of Central Elgin SHALL, in cooperation with the Kettle Creek
Conservation Authority, continue and enhance their established outreach and
education programs and promote best management practices in the Wellhead
Protection Areas (WHPAs) where there are or would be significant drinking
water threats to include messaging consistent with source water protection,
specifically for the following activities:
i. Waste Disposal Site Landfilling (Municipal Waste);
ii. Waste Disposal Site Landfilling (Solid Non Hazardous Industrial or
Commercial);
iii. Waste Disposal Site- Liquid Waste Injection into a well;
iv. The handling and storage of pesticides;
v. The application of pesticides to land;
vi. The handling and storage of fuel;
vii. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
viii. The handling and storage of Dense Non Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPL’s);
ix. The application of agriculture source material;
x. The storage of agriculture source material;
xi. The application of non-agriculture source material; and
xii. The handling and storage of non-agriculture source material.
|
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
BE-MC-3.1 |
To ensure that these activities never become significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall PROHIBIT through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process the following future activities within the meaning of the Environmental Protection Act or as defined by the Ontario Water Resources Act that are subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, where they would be significant drinking water threats in the Belmont Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) 'A':
Sewage system or sewage works- Septic Systems;
Sewage system or sewage works- Storage of Sewage;
Sewage system or sewage works- Sewage Treatment Plant effluent discharges;
Sewage system or sewage works- Discharge of Stormwater Management Facility;
Sewage system or sewage works- Septic System Holding Tank;
Storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines;
Waste Disposal Site- Landfilling of petroleum refining waste;
Waste Disposal Site- Landfilling (Hazardous Waste);
Waste Disposal Site- Landfilling (Municipal Waste);
Waste Disposal Site- Landfilling (Solid Non Hazardous Industrial or Commercial);
Waste Disposal Site- Liquid Waste Injection into a well;
Waste Disposal Site- PCB Waste Storage;
Waste Disposal Site- Storage of Hazardous Waste at Disposal Sites;
Waste Disposal Site- Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste; and
Application of Untreated Septage to Land.
|
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BE-MC-3.2 |
The Ministry of the Environment shall PROHIBIT the following future activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process where they would be a significant drinking water threat in the Belmont Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) 'B' to ensure that these activities never become significant drinking water threats:
Waste Disposal Site- Landfilling (Municipal Waste);
Waste Disposal Site- Landfilling (Solid Non Hazardous Industrial or Commercial);
Waste Disposal Site- Liquid Waste Injection into a well; and
Sewage system or sewage works- Storage of Sewage.
|
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
BE-MC-3.3 |
The Ministry of the Environment shall MANAGE future sewage system or sewage works- sanitary sewers and related pipes within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat in the Belmont Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) 'A' by ensuring terms and conditions are imposed that, when implemented, this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BE-NB-5.1 |
The Airport Authority SHALL CONSIDER appropriate design standards and management practices for any new airports within the Belmont Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) to ensure that the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
BE-NB-6.1 |
The Municipality of Central Elgin SHALL, when becoming aware of improperly abandoned wells in WHPA 'A' and 'B' where activities would be significant drinking water threats, notify the Ministry of the Environment to aid in the enforcement of O. Reg. 903. |
Kettle Creek |
Non-specific |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
C.10.3 |
Upon the Plan coming into effect, relevant airport authorities or operators should include appropriate standards and management practices in all future national airport facilities to ensure that the run-off that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
C.8.2 |
Within three years of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities should require all commercial landowners within their jurisdiction which are located either entirely or partially within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10 and engage in the handling, storage or application of road salt where it would be a moderate or low threat, to develop a salt management plan. The salt management plan will outline required (if any) structural or management alterations which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. The salt management plans are expected to be based on existing programs such as Smart About Salt. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
C.8.3 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA) shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction engaged in road salt handling, storage or application* where it is a significant drinking water threat, either entirely or partially within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOECC Tables of Circumstances):
a) application* of road salt where the impervious surface is greater than 80%
b) storage of road salt where the vulnerability score is 10 and the quantity stored is greater
than 5,000 tonnes.
The outreach and education program is intended to help inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. The education program should be based on existing programs such as �Smart About Salt�.
* It should be noted that road salt application cannot become a significant threat to drinking water without an increase in the impervious surface area to 80% or more of the lands within wellhead protection areas (please refer to the explanatory document for further information). |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set out by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date the notice is given;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 policies regarding restricted land uses shall take effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the City and/or the Source Protection Authority to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
e. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan or amendment took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the Official Plan must be amended and adopted by council to conform with the significant threat policies within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect or the next Official Plan review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and the Zoning By-law within two (2) years from the adoption of the Official Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-1.12 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water
Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the policies
of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the circumstances shown
on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed interpretation of the boundaries
relies on the mapping in the approved Assessment Report and the Specific
Circumstances found in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act,
2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer
to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any subsequent
amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also applicable to
any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the
municipality. |
Grand River |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-1.13 |
Despite the definition of existing, for the purposes of this Plan, where one or more of the following:
- A complete application for development under the Planning Act or Condominium Act;
- An application for Environmental Compliance Approval; or An application for a Building Permit. has been received by the applicable implementing body prior to the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect a related significant drinking water threat shall be permitted subject to the policies pertaining to existing significant drinking water threats.
Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, the above noted transition policies shall no longer apply. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-1.2 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Section 57 or Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act (as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07 Section 62), or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purpose of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the building official, as the case may be, that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-1.4 |
The City and the Source Protection Authority request continued Provincial funding and
support for incentive programs, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program,
to assist in protecting existing and future drinking water sources and addressing
significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-1.5 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from any existing and/or future significant drinking
water threat, the City of Brantford, in collaboration with Conservation Authorities and other
bodies wherever possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs
directed at any, or all, significant drinking water threats where such programs are deemed
necessary and/or appropriate by the City. Such programs may include, but not necessarily
be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of significant drinking water threats
and promotion of best management practices.
The Education and Outreach program may consist of targeted mailings to specific
property owners, inserts with current City mailings, inclusion of Source Water Protection
information in existing education and outreach programs and/or information available on
the City’s website. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-10.1 |
To ensure any existing or future handling and storage of road salt ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the City shall develop and implement education and outreach programs for the private and public sector, as well as the general public, about the impacts of road salt on drinking water sources and the use of best management practices. Key messages should be to promote the efficient use of road salts and the use of alternatives. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-10.2 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of road salt ceases to be and/or
never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activities are, or would be,
significant drinking water threats, the City shall amend its salt management plan to identify
the location of the Intake Protection Zones and to enhance best management practices in
these areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-10.4 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of road salt where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-10.5 |
To ensure any existing or future application of road salt where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the City shall develop and implement education and outreach programs for the private and public sector, as well as the general public, about the impacts of road salt on drinking water sources and the use of best management practices. It is recommended that the key messages be the efficient use of road salts and the use of alternatives to ensure this activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-11.2 |
To ensure the existing storage of snow where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, the activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-12.1 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of fuel greater than 2,500 Litres, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan shall include the requirements for all storage tanks to comply with the requirements of the Technical Standards and Safety Act and its regulations, for all owners/operators to have an emergency response plan with emergency contact information of the municipality responsible for water services and the Spills Action Centre, and for the owner/operator to call both agencies in the case of a release of fuel. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-12.1.1 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of fuel greater than 2,500 Litres never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat; related land uses shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-13.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) and organic solvents on non-residential properties ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such activities are significant drinking water threats these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-13.2 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPL) and organic solvents on non-residential properties never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-13.3 |
To ensure the existing or future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids
(DNAPL) and organic solvents on residential properties, ceases to be and/or never
becomes a significant drinking water threat where such activities are or would be
significant drinking water threats, the City shall develop and implement an education and
outreach program to encourage property owners to utilize alternative products where
available and to use the proper disposal procedures for these products. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-15.1 |
To ensure the existing or future use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing land, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-15.3 |
To ensure the existing or future use of land for outdoor confinement areas or farm-animal yards, for farms not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-2.3 |
To ensure any new waste disposal site, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, with the exception of the storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste as per O. Reg. 347, which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited in the following vulnerable areas:
In an Intake Protection Zone 1 with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10)
In an Intake Protection Zone 2 with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9), except for the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste
In an Intake Protection Zone 3 with a vulnerability score equal to eight (8), except for the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-2.4 |
To ensure any new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, for the storage of hazardous and liquid industrial waste, with the exception of the storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste as per O. Reg. 347, which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval and where such waste disposal site would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity such that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat in the following vulnerable areas:
a. In an Intake Protection Zone 2 with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9)
b. In an Intake Protection Zone 3 with a vulnerability score equal to eight (8)
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan may be based on Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks tools and requirements for such activities, as set out in the Environmental Protection Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-2.5 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, with the exception of the storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste as per O. Reg. 347, which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, cease to be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan may be based on Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks tools and requirements for such activities, as set out in the Environmental Protection Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-2.6 |
The City of Brantford, in collaboration with Conservation Authorities and other bodies
wherever possible, shall develop and implement education and outreach programs to
address any existing and future waste disposal site, within the meaning of Part V of the
Environmental Protection Act, including the storage of wastes described in clauses (p),
(q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition
of liquid industrial waste as per O. Reg. 347, within vulnerable areas where this activity is
or would be a significant drinking water threat, that do not require an Environmental
Compliance Approval. The program should focus on the proper handling, storage and
disposal of wastes to ensure that these activities cease to be or never become significant
drinking water threats.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-3.1 |
To ensure any existing or new onsite sewage systems within Intake Protection Zone 1 where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the City shall develop an education and outreach program to encourage landowners to connect to a municipal sewage system where municipal services are provided. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-3.5.1 |
To ensure any new discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat; this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58, of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where a Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Environmental Compliance Approval is not required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-4.1 |
To ensure any existing or future application of Agricultural Source Material (ASM) to land, on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58, of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
As a minimum, this Risk Management Plan shall be based upon the regulatory requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act and scoped to address these specific threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-5.1 |
To ensure any existing storage of Agricultural Source Material (ASM) on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
As a minimum, this Risk Management Plan shall be based upon the regulatory requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act and scoped to address these specific threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-5.3 |
To ensure any future storage of Agricultural Source Material (ASM) where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat; the activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-7.3 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of commercial fertilizer never becomes a significant drinking water threat, within Intake Protection Zone 1, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, these activities are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-8.1 |
To ensure any existing or future application of pesticides, on non-residential properties, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be and or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-8.2 |
To ensure any existing or future application of pesticides, on residential properties, where
such activities are, or would be significant drinking water threats, ceases to be and or
never becomes a significant drinking water threat the City shall develop and implement
education and outreach programs on the use of best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-9.1 |
To ensure any existing and future handling and storage of pesticides on non-residential properties cease to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, within Intake Protection Zone 2, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-9.2 |
To ensure any future handling and storage of pesticides within the meaning of the Pesticide Act within Intake Protection Zone 1, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-CW-9.3 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of pesticides within the meaning of the Pesticide Act within Intake Protection Zone 1, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-1.3 |
The City shall amend its Official Plan and respective Zoning By-Laws to:
- Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by the Source Protection Plan policies; and
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-10.3 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of road salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat; related land uses shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-11.1 |
To ensure the future storage of snow never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat; related land uses shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-12.2 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of fuel greater than 2,500 Litres never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat; related land uses shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-15.2 |
To ensure the existing or future use of land as outdoor confinement areas of farm-animal yards, for farms phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review and amend Nutrient Management Plans and/or Strategies to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, the activity cease to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-2.1 |
To ensure any new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-2.2 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, cease to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals include appropriate terms and conditions.
As part of the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs an existing waste disposal site, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the proponent maintains records on site and/or makes them available upon request.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-3.2 |
To ensure any existing or new onsite sewage systems, regulated under Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review or prepare Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, the activity will ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-3.3 |
To ensure any existing or new sewage treatment tanks, sanitary sewers and related pipes, and industrial effluent discharges where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review or prepare Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated, that when implemented, ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-3.4 |
To ensure any existing or new discharge from a stormwater management facility within an Intake Protection Zone where such activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review or prepare Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, cease to be and/or never become a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-3.5 |
To ensure any future discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, and in consideration of applications received under the Planning Act or Condominium Act, the City of Brantford shall locate future stormwater management facilities outside of the Intake Protection Zone, wherever possible. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-3.6 |
To ensure any existing combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented the activity shall cease to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-3.7 |
To ensure any future combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat; the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-3.8 |
To ensure any existing sewage treatment plant by-pass to surface water and effluent discharges where such activities are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated, that when implemented, the activity shall cease to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-3.9 |
To ensure any future sewage treatment plant by-pass to surface water and effluent discharges where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, never become significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-4.2 |
To ensure any existing and future application of Agricultural Source Material (ASM) to land on farms phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review or prepare Nutrient Management Plans and/or Strategies to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, the activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-5.2 |
To ensure any existing storage of Agricultural Source Material (ASM) on farms phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review Nutrient Management Plans and/or Strategies to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-6.1 |
To ensure any existing or future application, or handling and storage of Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat in Intake Protection Zone 2 with a vulnerability score of 9 and Intake Protection Zone 3 with a vulnerability score of eight (8), the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, shall review NASM Plans, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or Environmental Compliance Approvals, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, these activities cease to be and/or never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-6.2 |
To ensure any existing or future application, or handling and storage of Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat in Intake Protection Zone 1, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, shall prohibit NASM Plans, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or Environmental Compliance Approvals, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure these activities cease to be and/or never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-MC-7.2 |
To ensure any future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer never becomes a significant drinking water threat, within Intake Protection Zone 1, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CB-NB-1.11 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from spills that occur within the Intake Protection Zone (IPZ) along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes,
a. The City shall incorporate the location of Intake Protection Zones into their Emergency Response Plans.
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, shall provide mapping of the Intake Protection Zones (IPZ) to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CB-NB-14.1 |
To ensure the management of runoff containing chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the airport authority shall insure the use of appropriate design standards and management practices to prevent the runoff from airport de-icing facilities from becoming a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set out by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location immediately before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding restricted land uses shall come into effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect; and
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the City of Guelph and/or the Source Protection Authority to develop and implement education and outreach programs, incentive programs or other specified action for significant drinking water threats, such programs and actions shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-1.18 |
To address Conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the City of Guelph shall:
a. Continue to support environmental investigation, remediation and redevelopment through the incentives provided through the City of Guelph Brownfield Redevelopment Community Improvement Plan; and
b. Implement an education program on drinking water issues associated with contaminated sites in conjunction with the implementation of the City of Guelph’s Brownfield Community Redevelopment Program including the
protection of drinking water sources and the use of the Record of Site Condition process as a best management practice to address Condition Sites. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-1.23 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006; and
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to
refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any
subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is
also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the
Province or the municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-1.3 |
The City of Guelph shall consider passing a by-law to assist in the ongoing identification of persons and/or locations engaged in significant threat activities
identified in these policies.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-1.4 |
In accordance with Section 59(1) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the following land uses identified within the City of Guelph Official Plan are hereby designated as land uses to which the restricted land uses provisions of the Clean Water Act, 2006 apply where activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat:
All land uses, except solely residential uses, in all areas where the establishment, operation and maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
All agricultural land uses in all areas where the application of Agricultural Source Material to land and the storage of Agricultural Source Material is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
All land uses, except solely residential, in all areas where the application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
All land uses, except solely residential uses, in all areas where the application of pesticide to land and the handling and storage of pesticides is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
All land uses, except solely residential uses, in all areas where the storage of snow is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
All land uses in all areas where handling and storage of fuel is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
All land uses, except solely residential uses, in all areas where the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
All land uses, except solely residential uses, in all areas where the activity of handling and storage of an organic solvent is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
All agricultural land uses in all areas where the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area, or a farm-animal yard is or would be a significant drinking water threat; and
All land uses in all areas where the application of Non-Agricultural Source Material to land and the storage of Non-Agricultural Source Material is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is not designated for the purposes of section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as applicable, is satisfied that:
a. The application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and
b. The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-1.6 |
To support the significant drinking water threat policies contained within this Source Protection Plan, the City of Guelph, in collaboration with other bodies where
possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the City of Guelph and
where there is available funding. Such programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of significant drinking water
threats and promotion of best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-1.7 |
The City, in collaboration with other bodies and levels of government where
possible, may develop and implement incentive programs directed at significant
drinking water threat activities, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or
appropriate by the City of Guelph and subject to available funding. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-13 |
To ensure sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (including lagoons) cease to
be a significant drinking water threat related to a sewage treatment plant, the City
of Guelph shall encourage the existing Industrial/ Commercial/ Institutional Sector
to complete the Waste Survey Report as part of a new education and outreach
program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-17 |
To ensure existing and future application or storage of agricultural source material ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat on properties not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act within vulnerable areas where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the existing and future application or storage of agricultural source material within a vulnerable area is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006; and a Risk Management Plan will be required.
A Risk Management Plan, if necessary, shall be based upon the regulatory requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act scoped to address these specific threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-2.1 |
For the purposes of the City of Guelph Source Protection Plan policies, where one or more of the following has been received prior to the Source Protection Plan coming into effect:
A complete application for site plan approval under the Planning Act;
A complete application for Environmental Compliance Approval; or
A complete application for a Building Permit;
A related significant threat activity shall be permitted subject to the policies pertaining to existing significant threat activity as well as any further applications required under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, Building Permit or Prescribed Instruments required to implement the development proposal associated with this significant threat activity. Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, this policy shall no longer apply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-20 |
CG-CW-1.10: To ensure the future application, or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material in a Wellhead Protection Area A never becomes a significant drinking water threat, these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-23 |
To ensure the existing or future application and storage of commercial fertilizer cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats for properties not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, and/or the existing storage of commercial fertilizer of greater than 2,500 Kilograms of commercial fertilizer in Wellhead Protection Area A and B, and/or new or expanded storage of commercial fertilizer of greater than 2,500 Kilograms of commercial fertilizer outside of a Wellhead Protection Area A, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required.
The Risk Management Plan for the application and storage of commercial fertilizer for agricultural operations shall be based upon, as a minimum, the regulatory requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan under the Nutrient Management Act and scoped to address this specific threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-26 |
To ensure that the existing or future application, or handling and storage of pesticide cease to be and/or never become a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats, excluding the future handling and storage of greater than 2,500 Kilograms of pesticide or the storage of greater than 250 Kilograms for retail sale or for extermination within a Wellhead Protection Area A, these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required.
A Risk Management Plan shall incorporate, as a minimum, best management practices, monitoring and an inspection protocol. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-28 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of road salt never becomes a
significant drinking water threat within the vulnerable areas, where this activity
would be a significant drinking threat, within two (2) years of the date that the
Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Guelph shall amend the Salt
Management Plan to identify the location of Wellhead Protection Areas and utilize
best management practices in these areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-31 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of road salt never becomes a
significant drinking water threat within the vulnerable areas, where this activity
would be a significant drinking water threat, the City of Guelph shall establish or
enhance the education and outreach programs for the private and public sector, as
well as the general public, about the impacts of road salt on drinking water sources
and the use of best management practices. It is recommended that the key
messages be the efficient use of road salts and the use of alternatives. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-32.2 |
To ensure that the existing and future storage of snow ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the activity of storage of snow has been designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-33 |
To ensure that the existing and future handling and storage of fuel ceases to be
and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area,
where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the City of
Guelph shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for
identified fuel oil tanks with storage of fuel greater than 250 Litres and less than or
equal to 2,500 Litres outlining the requirements of owning a heating oil system
including proper maintenance and the steps to be taken if there is a spill or leak
detected based on guidance information provided from the Technical Standards
and Safety Authority and other heating oil system provides/ agencies. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-34 |
To ensure that existing and future handling and storage of fuel greater than 2,500 Litres ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
Within a Wellhead Protection Area A, new handling and storage of fuel in conjunction with a new retail gas station or new or bulk fuel storage facility excluding bulk fuel storage associated with a municipal emergency generator facility is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited; and
Within Wellhead Protection Areas A and B, the existing and new handling and storage of fuel, within a vulnerable area, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required. The Risk Management Plan shall be scoped to a Contaminant Management Plan and any monitoring, reporting and auditing requirements required by the Technical Standards and Safety Authority, as appropriate.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-37 |
To ensure that the existing and future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, within a vulnerable area, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat:
New or expanded handling and storage of specified dense non-aqueous phase liquids is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A; and,
New or expanded handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids outside of the Wellhead Protection Area A and existing handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids within a vulnerable area, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required. A Risk Management Plan for a significant threat that is Technical Standards and Safety Authority regulated shall be scoped to a Contaminant Management Plan and any monitoring, reporting and auditing requirements provided to the Technical Standards and Safety Authority as appropriate to address the significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-39 |
To ensure that existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid
ceases to be a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area, where this
activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the City of Guelph shall
develop and implement education and outreach programs to encourage business
and industry to utilize alternative products where available. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-4 |
The establishment, operation and maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act and/or storage facility exempt from Environmental Compliance Approvals under Section 39 of the Environmental Protection Act within vulnerable areas where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat has been designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required except for the following. For the storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste or waste as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste for Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), the City of Guelph shall develop and implement an education and outreach program and encourage the appropriate handling and disposal of these wastes. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-40 |
To ensure that existing and future handling and storage of organic solvents ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat:
Any new or expanded handling and storage of the specified organic solvents in the quantities identified as significant drinking water threats are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A;
The existing and future handling and storage of organic solvents is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 within vulnerable areas in the Wellhead Protection Area B and a Risk Management Plan is required; and
The City of Guelph shall continue the established education and outreach programs on hazardous waste disposal, responsible waste disposal and reduction of waste including organic solvents in Wellhead Protection Area A and B.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-44 |
To ensure that the existing or future use of land as an outdoor confinement area, or farm animal yard on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act, or the use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing on all farms ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required.
Risk Management Plans shall be based upon the regulatory requirements of a Nutrient Management Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act as a minimum and incorporate best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-6 |
Within vulnerable areas where on-site sewage systems and holding tanks are or would be significant drinking water threats, the City of Guelph shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required under the Ontario Building Code Act with a priority for inspections on those systems in closest proximity to the municipal drinking water supply to ensure this activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-CW-7 |
For existing on-site sewage systems and holding tanks within the City of Guelph, the City of Guelph shall encourage landowners through an education and outreach program to connect to a municipal sewage system, when an on-site sewage systems and holding tank is used within a vulnerable area, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, and where municipal services are provided in the immediate vicinity, to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-1.15 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall
a. Ensure that all Prescribed Instruments issued for Condition Sites include terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the risk to drinking water sources is managed. Appropriate conditions may include requirements for source control, remediation to provincial standards, monitoring and Contaminant Management Plans;
b. Ensure that Prescribed Instruments include a condition requiring the instrument holder to report on the actions taken and the status of the site to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Source Protection Authority and the municipality on an annual basis; and
c. Provide to the City of Guelph a copy of the new or revised Prescribed Instrument.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-1.17 |
The City of Guelph shall require as a component of a complete application under the Planning Act the completion of an environmental screening process using a contaminated sites protocol. The contaminated sites protocol will outline the criteria when a Record of Site Condition (RSC) will be required as part of the Planning Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set out by the Minister.
a. For Section 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location immediately before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Sections 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Official Plan and Zoning By Laws must be amended to conform with the significant threat policies within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan comes into effect or the next Official Plan review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and the Zoning By-law within (2) years from the adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-1.25 |
Any Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act that is created or amended or is used for the purposes of obtaining an exemption from a Risk Management Plan under section 61 of O. Reg. 287/07 shall incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, manage the activities they regulate such that those activities cease to be or never become, a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions, including the Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-1.5 |
The City of Guelph shall adopt an amendment to the Official Plan, where necessary to conform to the significant drinking water threat policies in accordance with Section 40 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, to:
Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 are or would be significant;
Indicate that within the areas identified, any land use that is or would be a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies; and
Incorporate any other amendments required to conform to the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-10 |
For existing and future onsite sewage systems regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act located within vulnerable areas where they are or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the onsite sewage system includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure this activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-11 |
For existing and future sewage treatment plants located within vulnerable areas where the activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the sewage treatment plant includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that these activities cease to be and/or do not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-12 |
To ensure sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (including lagoons) never become a future significant drinking water threat related to a sewage treatment plant, the City of Guelph shall require that, for any Planning Act application, for a new Industrial/ Commercial/ Institutional use that a Waste Survey Report be filed as part of the complete application requirements. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-14 |
For existing and future sanitary sewers and pipes within vulnerable areas where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the sanitary sewer and related pipes includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-15 |
For the existing or future discharge from a stormwater management facility within vulnerable areas where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the stormwater management facility includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-16 |
To ensure existing and future application or storage of agricultural source material ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, for operations which are managed by Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies under the Nutrient Management Act and located within a vulnerable area where the application or storage is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the risk to drinking water sources is appropriately managed and that required contingency plans contain the requirement for notification of the appropriate municipal official and the Spills Action Centre if a leak is discovered from an agricultural source material facility or there is a spill. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-19 |
Where the existing application, or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material in a Wellhead Protection Area A is or where the future application, or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material in a Wellhead Protection Area or where a nitrate issue has been identified would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure all non-agricultural source material plans (NASM plans) and Environmental Compliance Approvals required under the Nutrient Management Act and Environmental Protection Act include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-22 |
Where the existing or future application of commercial fertilizer is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that Nutrient Management Plans required under the Nutrient Management Act include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-24 |
To ensure that the new storage of fertilizer never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the storage of greater than 2,500 Kilograms of commercial fertilizer, new or expanded manufacturing and wholesale warehousing facilities with storage of greater than 2,500 Kilograms of commercial fertilizer is prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A using tools under the Planning Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-25 |
To ensure that the existing or future application, or handling and storage of pesticide cease to be and/or never become significant drinking water threats within a vulnerable area, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that all permits under the Pesticide Act include appropriate terms and conditions. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-27 |
To ensure that the future storage of pesticide never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, new manufacturing and wholesale warehousing facilities with storage of greater than 2,500 Kilograms of pesticide or the storage of greater than 250 Kilograms for retail sale or for extermination are prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A using tools under the Planning Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-29 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the City of Guelph shall require new development to be designed based on best management practices regarding handling and storage. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-3 |
For waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act within vulnerable areas where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat:
a. For an existing waste disposal site, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the waste disposal site includes terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat;
b. For future waste disposal sites including discharges from future mine tailings ponds under the Ontario Water Resource Act and/or for future waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, except for waste disposal sites-storage, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process so that these activities never become a significant drinking water threat; and
c. For future waste disposal sites - storage, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the waste disposal site - storage includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the waste disposal site never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
d. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs an existing or new temporary waste destruction unit for Polychlorinated biphenyl contains appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become be a significant drinking water threat. The Environmental Compliance Approval shall include annual reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks of water quality monitoring in related groundwater monitoring wells and surface water monitoring locations as appropriate.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-30 |
To ensure that future storage of road salt of greater than 5,000 tonnes never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be prohibited using tools under the Planning Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-32.1 |
To ensure that the future storage of snow never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the City of Guelph shall require new development to be designed and maintained based on best management practices regarding snow storage including the provision of designated snow storage areas and the management of associated melt water. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-35 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of fuel never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the future handling and storage of fuel in conjunction with a new or expanded retail gas station and new or expanded bulk fuel storage facility excluding bulk fuel storage associated with a municipal emergency generator facility is prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A using tools under the Planning Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-36 |
Where future handling and storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area for activities regulated under the Aggregate Resources Act, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry should ensure that licenses, permits and/or site plans issued under the Aggregate Resources Act and/or related regulations, standards and policies include terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-38 |
To ensure that the future storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquid never becomes a significant drinking water threat, within vulnerable areas, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, new or expanded storage of the specified dense non-aqueous phase liquids identified as a significant drinking water threat under the Clean Water Act, 2006 is prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A using tools under the Planning Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-41 |
To ensure that new or expansion to existing storage of organic solvents never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the new or expanded storage of the specified organic solvents in the quantities identified as a significant drinking water threat is prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A using tools under the Planning Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-43 |
To ensure that the existing and future use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard on farms phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure all Nutrient Management Strategies include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the risk to drinking water sources is managed. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-5 |
To ensure that on-site sewage systems never become a significant drinking water threat, new lots that rely on servicing by onsite sewage systems with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act are prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-MC-8 |
To ensure that future on-site sewage systems and holding tanks never become a significant drinking water threat, the City of Guelph shall require all new development to connect to municipal services except where private services are specifically permitted within the Official Plan on the date when the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.13 |
To better understand the contributing source of contaminants within the Issue Contributing Areas (ICA) with respect to the applicable existing and future significant drinking water threats, the Grand River Conservation Authority in collaboration with the City of Guelph is encouraged, under the Source Water Protection Program funding, to find opportunities to research in the future nitrogen and/or pathogen issues to determine whether application and/or storage of Agricultural Source Materials is a contributing source of contaminant in the Issue Contributing Areas (ICA). |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.16 |
To address Conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should prioritize abatement activities on Conditions Sites located within the Wellhead Protection Area A, Wellhead Protection Area B and Issues Contributing Areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.19 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and the City of Guelph:
a. Shall meet at a minimum frequency of every six months for the purpose of mutually sharing information on Condition sites; and
b. Should mutually share information related, as appropriate, to technical investigations or remediation, technical data, actions taken by Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks or by the City of Guelph, inspections, other relevant information; and
c. Should develop an Information-Sharing Process document including requirements, if any, for meeting agendas, participants, the nature and format for the types of information to be mutually shared, and the Information-Sharing Process document should be developed within six months from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.20 |
To ensure Emergency Response Plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a Wellhead Protection Area along highways or railway lines, the following policies apply:
a. Within five (5) years of the Source Protection Plan coming into effect, the City of Guelph is requested to incorporate the location of Wellhead Protection Areas into the Emergency Response Plan to protect drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways or rail lines; and
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide mapping of vulnerable areas to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors within two years of the source protection plan coming into effect.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.21 |
To protect municipal water supplies from increased vulnerability due to transport pathways where activities could be a significant drinking water threat, the following policies apply:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide ongoing funding for incentive programs focused on facilitating the abandonment of wells in accordance with O. Reg. 903;
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested as a priority to enforce the requirements of O. Reg. 903 with respect to the abandonment of wells and to enforce Section 33(1), (2) and (3) of the Ontario Water Resources Act once it comes into full force and effect;
c. The City of Guelph is requested to incorporate conditions of approval for Planning Act and Condominium Act applications to ensure private wells that are no longer in use are abandoned in accordance with O. Reg. 903; and
d. The City of Guelph is requested to ensure best management practices are utilized to protect the quantity and quality of groundwater sources during the installation of new municipal infrastructure.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.22 |
The City of Guelph should amend its Official Plan to require the assessment and mitigation of impacts of the establishment of transport pathways associated with Planning Act applications in Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability equals ten (10). |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.24 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, and the Ministry of Natural Resources, for Prescribed Instruments and Conditions for significant drinking water threats within vulnerable areas, should consider advising the City of Guelph regarding applications under review and that the City of Guelph be provided an opportunity to provide comments on these applications. The relevant Ministry shall have due regard to the comments submitted by the City of Guelph.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.26 |
OMAFRA, and other creators/issuers of Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act, are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into such Prescribed Instruments to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-1.8 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and other Provincial Ministries shall consider providing funding for incentive programs, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program, to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-16.1 |
To ensure existing and future application or storage of agricultural source material ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, for operations which are managed by Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies under the Nutrient Management Act and located within a vulnerable area where the application or storage is or would be a significant drinking water threat The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider prioritizing and conducting regular compliance inspections of agricultural operations, as appropriate, where significant drinking water threat activities exist, and shall consider guiding farmers to improve compliance performance, when needed. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-18 |
To provide further guidance to the agricultural community about the importance of source water protection to ensure the application or storage of agricultural source material ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs is requested to review and amend, if necessary, the information provided to the agricultural community to include information about source water protection, the location of Wellhead Protection Areas and the appropriate use of agricultural source material within vulnerable areas where this activity is or would be a significant water threat. The information provided should encourage farm operators located within these vulnerable areas to complete an Environmental Farm Plan. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-21 |
To ensure compliance with non-agricultural source material plans and the existing and future application, or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material cease to be and/or never become a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider prioritizing inspections based on proximity to the wellhead and conduct regular compliance inspections of operations, as appropriate. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-42 |
To ensure that future runoff containing de-icing chemicals never becomes a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the airport authority/operator is encouraged to include appropriate design standards and best management practices.
The City of Guelph shall report to the Source Protection Authority if an application has been made for a new airport facility within the vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat by February 1st of each year. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-45 |
To ensure that the existing or future use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act, or the use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing on all farms ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is encouraged to continue to provide ongoing funding for stewardship projects on agricultural properties; and
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider prioritizing and conducting regular compliance inspections of agricultural operations, as appropriate, and shall consider guiding farmers to improve compliance performance, when needed.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-46 |
To ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the establishment and operation of a hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, the Canada Energy Regulator, and Ontario Energy Board, in their consideration of any pipelines within vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, are encouraged to ensure the applicant has complied with or included appropriate design standards and monitoring and maintenance practices, where applicable, to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CG-NB-9 |
To ensure existing on-site sewage systems and holding tanks cease to be a significant drinking water threat, the Grand River Conservation Authority, in consultation with the City of Guelph, will deliver available cost share incentive programs, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, as long as the Grand River Conservation Authority has such programs and outreach staff available, and work with affected land owners to implement best management practices.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall take effect on the date set out by the Minister.
a. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan or amendment took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
b. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding restricted land uses shall take effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
c. Where the Source Protection Policies require the City of Hamilton to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan or amendment takes effect; and,
e. For Section 40(2) and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Official Plan and Zoning By Laws must be amended to conform with the significant threat policies and adopted by municipal council by the next five (5) year Official Plan update as required under subsection 26(1) of the Planning Act or within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-1.13 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water
Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the policies
of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the circumstances shown
on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed interpretation of the boundaries
relies on the mapping in the approved Assessment Report and the Specific
Circumstances found in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water
Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer
to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any subsequent
amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also applicable to
any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the
municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-1.2 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses, unless identified specifically within a policy, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Section 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act Application. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-10.1 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of fuel ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, the requirements for all storage tanks to comply with the requirements of the Technical Standards and Safety Act and its regulations, for all owners/operators to have an emergency response plan with emergency contact information of the municipality responsible for water services and the Spills Action Centre. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-10.3 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of fuel ceases to be or never
becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a
significant drinking water threat, within five (5) years of the date that the Source Protection
Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton shall develop and implement an education and
outreach program for homeowners with home fuel oil tanks, regarding spill response and
the method and timing for contacting the Spills Action Centre. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-11.1 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-12.1 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-14.1 |
To ensure the risks to drinking water from the existing or potential future use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act, or from the use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing on all farms, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan shall be based upon the regulatory requirements of a nutrient management strategy under the Nutrient Management Act and incorporate the best management practices for livestock grazing and pasturing land. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-2.2 |
To ensure the disposal of hazardous materials at waste disposal sites never becomes a
significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking
water threat, the City of Hamilton shall continue their established education and outreach
programs on hazardous waste disposal and reduction of waste. The programs shall
include messaging consistent with source water protection and the diligent use and
disposal of substances.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-3.4 |
To increase awareness about best practices to protect drinking water sources for users of
septic systems and holding tanks located within vulnerable areas where their use is or
would be a significant drinking water threat, within five (5) years of the date the Source
Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton, in collaboration with the
Conservation Authority, is requested to continue and broaden education and outreach
programs.
The programs should inform landowners about the proper disposal of toxic chemicals, the
operation and maintenance of sewage systems, and the benefits of installing effluent
filters, performing tank inspections, and having tanks regularly pumped out. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-3.5 |
To ensure existing and future septic systems cease to be, or never become, significant
drinking water threats, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water
threat, the City of Hamilton shall implement a septic system maintenance inspection
program subject to the requirements of the Ontario Building Code within vulnerable areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-3.7 |
To assist landowners with improvements to septic systems and holding tanks required
under the septic systems maintenance inspection program implemented where septic
systems are significant threats and in accordance with the Ontario Building Code Act, the
City of Hamilton shall consider the creation of a financial assistance program designed in
a manner that allows the work to be completed as required, and the landowner to repay
the cost over time. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-4.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application and storage of agriculture source material ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The content shall be based upon, but not limited to, the regulatory requirements of a nutrient management plan and strategy under the Nutrient Management Act and scoped to address these specific threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-6.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-7.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application of pesticide and the handling and storage of pesticide, cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, these activities are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-CW-7.2 |
To ensure the future application, handling or storage of pesticides never become a
significant drinking water threat, where the activity is a significant drinking water threat, the
City of Hamilton, in collaboration with the Conservation Authority is requested to undertake
an education and outreach program on pesticide use and storage methods and their
potential impacts on drinking water sources.
The program should consider including wellhead protection area mapping and target
pesticide applicators, exterminators and farmers. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-1.3 |
The City of Hamilton shall amend their Official Plan and/ or Zoning By-Laws to:
- Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies;
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform to the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-10.2 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of fuel never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat; the City of Hamilton shall prohibit gas stations through Planning Act tools. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-14.2 |
Where the existing and potential future use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat and is managed by nutrient management strategies prepared under the Nutrient Management Act, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that all existing and future nutrient management strategies incorporate measures to protect drinking water sources that, when implemented, ensure that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-2.1 |
To ensure the future establishment of waste disposal sites never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, as defined within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process for such waste disposal sites on lands located within identified vulnerable areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-2.3 |
To ensure the establishment of waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, the City of Hamilton shall prohibit through amendments to Planning Act tools the establishment of waste disposal sites and the specific land uses. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-3.1 |
To ensure any existing or future septic systems and holding tanks regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals required for these septic systems are prepared to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will ensure that they do not become a risk to drinking water. The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate:
mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts;
contingencies in the event that the quality of sources of drinking water is adversely affected;
regular and ongoing compliance monitoring;
mandatory system inspections at least every five years;
upgrading of these septic systems to current standards, if necessary; and
annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority of any monitoring and inspection programs required and their results. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-3.10 |
To ensure the future discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility never becomes a significant drinking water threat the Ministry of the Environment shall prepare/ amend the environmental compliance approvals to incorporate conditions that, when implemented, will ensure they do not become a risk to drinking water.
The conditions may include the requirement for regular maintenance, periodic removal of accumulated sediment, lining of the pond where warranted, the use of an oil/water separator, and other requirements to address site conditions. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-3.11 |
To ensure the discharge of storm water effluent from a storm water management facility never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, where possible, the City of Hamilton, in consideration of Planning Act applications for the development of stormwater management facilities, shall require the applicant to locate future stormwater management facilities outside of the vulnerable area. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-3.2 |
To ensure the establishment of new septic systems and holding tanks regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, the City of Hamilton, in consideration of site plan approval for properties located partially within vulnerable areas, shall require the applicants to locate the septic systems outside of vulnerable areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-3.3 |
To ensure future septic systems and holding tanks regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, the City of Hamilton shall require through amendments to Planning Act tools that future lot sizes be sufficient to accommodate the systems. Where possible, the municipal planning authority shall require the applicants to locate the septic systems outside of a vulnerable area. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-3.8 |
To ensure any existing or new sanitary sewer and pipes cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals required for sanitary sewers and pipes are prepared/amended to incorporate conditions that, when implemented, will ensure that they do not become a risk to drinking water.
The conditions may include requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake regular maintenance and inspections. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-3.9 |
To ensure existing or future sewage treatment plants effluent discharges, bypasses, or the storage of sewage, cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall prepare/ amend the environmental compliance approvals to incorporate conditions that, when implemented, will ensure they do not become a risk to drinking water.
The conditions may include strict criteria for effluent quality, appropriate sizing to reduce bypasses, in addition to inspections and proactive maintenance of the works to prevent leaks. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-5.1 |
To ensure the future application, handling and storage of non-agricultural source material never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and/or the Ministry of the Environment shall revoke or not approve any Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or within the Environmental Compliance Approval process that allows, or would permit these activities within vulnerable areas where it would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-8.1 |
Where the future handling and storage of greater than 5,000 tonnes of road salt would be a significant drinking water threat, the City of Hamilton shall prohibit through Planning Act tools salt storage and handling facilities with more than this capacity. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-MC-9.1 |
To ensure the future storage of snow never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the City of Hamilton shall prohibit this land use through Planning Act tools. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-NB-1.10 |
To ensure the protection of drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes, the City of Hamilton and the Ministry of the Environment are encouraged to incorporate the Wellhead Protection Area mapping into their Emergency Response Plan and Spills Action Centre mapping, respectively. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-NB-1.11 |
The City of Hamilton is requested to implement an education and outreach program to encourage all transportation businesses that ship goods through wellhead protection areas to prepare spill prevention plans and spill contingency plans, to review these plans annually, and to update them, as required. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-NB-1.12 |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006 that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway cease to be or do not become a significant threat, and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the following policies apply:
- The City of Hamilton is requested to use best management practices to protect the quantity and quality of groundwater sources during the installation of new municipal infrastructure in proximity to municipal water wells.
- The City of Hamilton is requested to incorporate conditions of approval for development applications to ensure private wells that are no longer in use are decommissioned in accordance with O. Reg. 903.
- The Ministry of the Environment and the municipalities responsible for water services are requested to provide ongoing funding for incentive programs focused on the decommissioning of wells, and for education and outreach programs regarding the decommissioning of wells.
- If funding is provided by the Ministry of the Environment through the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program, the Conservation Authority shall implement an incentive program to decommission unused wells.
- The City of Hamilton is requested to develop a program to facilitate, where possible and appropriate, the connection to municipal water services of current private well users within the urban boundary. The users should be required to decommission the unused wells in accordance with O. Reg. 903.
- The City of Hamilton is requested to prohibit the construction of new wells and septic systems within the urban area where municipal water and wastewater services are available.
- The City of Hamilton is requested to prepare bylaws/procedures/ processes that ensure the construction of closed loop, earth energy systems will not result in the establishment of transport pathways.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CH-NB-13.1 |
To ensure the management of runoff containing chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the relevant airport authorities and operators, in their consideration of any future airport facilities where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, are requested to include appropriate design standards and management practices to prevent the runoff from airport de-icing facilities from becoming a significant drinking water threat.
The City of Hamilton shall report to the Source Protection Authority if an application has been made for a new airport facility within the vulnerable areas by February 1 of each year. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-NB-15.1 |
To reduce the risk due to the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the pipeline proponent, the Canada Energy Regulator and the Ontario Energy Board are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the City the location of any new proposed pipeline within the City and/or Source Protection Area. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
CH-NB-3.6 |
To assist landowners in reducing the risks to drinking water sources where existing septic systems and holding tanks are significant threats, the Ministry of the Environment is requested to provide ongoing funding through the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program or a similar program for septic system upgrades, replacements, decommissioning of unused systems, and for connection to municipal systems. If funding is provided, the Conservation Authority shall implement the incentive program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CHEM-1 |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (Risk Management Plan) where the activity is an existing significant drinking water threat:
the handling and storage of an organic solvent;
the non-residential handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs); and
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft.
The Risk Management Plan shall include:
- Up-to-date best management practices regarding handling and storage of organic solvents and DNAPLs and the management of runoff containing chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
- A spills response plan which includes procedures to contact the local drinking water plant operator
- Consideration of alternative products which would not cause a significant threat.
Risk Management Plans shall be prepared in accordance with the provisions listed in policy GENERAL-5.
This policy is not intended to capture residential use of incidental volumes of DNAPLs.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1, GENERAL-5, and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CHEM-2 |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (prohibition) where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat:
the handling and storage of an organic solvent;
the non-residential handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs); and
the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft.
This prohibition takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
This policy is not intended to capture residential use of incidental volumes of DNAPLs
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1 and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
COND-1 |
The MOE, City of Barrie and Town of Penetanguishene is directed to provide each year to the SPA a report of the actions taken, if any, in relation to the contaminated site that has been identified as a significant threat, by MOE, City of Barrie, Town of Penetanguishene or other persons or bodies over the previous calendar year. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
COND-2 |
To monitor the change in the condition over time, the local planning approval authority shall notify the SPA of applications under the Planning Act affecting a site identified as a significant drinking water threat condition. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
CORR-1-NLB |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, municipalities are strongly encouraged to ensure that local first responders have information about the Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones (which will be marked by road and waterway signs) and should update emergency response plans to include:
Maps to show the location of municipal drinking water systems and associated Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones.
Requirements to contain water and chemicals used to suppress fires that occur in these areas, if appropriate.
Spill contingency measures for spills of any potential contaminant (e.g. fuel, chemicals, septage) resulting from highway accidents and train derailments that occur in these areas, if appropriate.
This policy applies to railways and highways as defined in subsection 1(1) of the Highway Traffic Act* within Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones (all scores).
*a common and public highway, street, avenue, parkway, driveway, square, place, bridge, viaduct or trestle, any part of which is intended for or used by the general public for the passage of vehicles and includes the areas between the lateral property lines thereof. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
CORR-2-NLB |
The MOECC is strongly encouraged to update spill response procedures for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a Wellhead Protection Area or Intake Protection Zone along highways and railway lines. Action to implement this policy should be initiated within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
D-1 |
Applicable Activities: The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid and/or the handling and storage of an organic solvent is an existing significant drinking water threat (see Table 4-6).
D-1: The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
D-2 |
Applicable Activities: The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid and/or the handling and storage of an organic solvent would be a future significant drinking water threat (see Table 4.8).
D-2: Activity is prohibited and designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
* Wellhead protection areas B and C for the Village of Havelock Municipal Drinking Water System are exempt from Policy D-2. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
D-3 |
Applicable Activities: The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid and/or the handling and storage of an organic solvent would be a future significant drinking water threat (see Table 4.8).
D-3(1): The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8.
D-3(2): The risk management plan required by (1) must, at a minimum:
1) Establish adequate measures for storage safety including proper storage facilities, leak detection and containment;
2) Include an emergency contingency plan;
3) Specify appropriate training of personnel; and
4) Require any other measure deemed necessary to reduce the risk of a release to the environment.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-1 |
No new waste disposal sites for the application of untreated septage to land shall be permitted within the DeCew Falls IPZ-1s. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-10 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation, Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) Spills Action Centre (SAC), and Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) are requested to update their Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) to include the following:
- Maps that show the locations of the DeCew Water Treatment Plant and associated Highway 406 and Lake Gibson Alternate intakes, and the areas where this policy applies.
- An up-to-date communications protocol showing the structure of command of the various agencies that would be contacted.
As it relates to railway corridors, Transport Canada is requested to ensure Emergency Response Plans under their jurisdiction are updated accordingly.
The ERP should be updated within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-11 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC), is requested to implement the following Risk Management Measures to address the potential impacts of a fuel spill on the raw water supply for the DeCew Falls Water Treatment Plant:
- Require that persons that handle fuel follow a protocol that uses best management practices to prevent spills from occurring.
- Ensure that spill containment booms can be readily deployed in the event of a fuel spill.
The risk management measures should be implemented within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-2 |
No new combined sewers, wastewater treatment facilities, stormwater management facilities, or industrial effluent systems shall be permitted where they would be a significant threat within the DeCew Falls IPZ-1s.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-3 |
No new industrial or commercial land uses shall be permitted within the DeCew Falls IPZ-1s, in order to prevent significant threats related to stormwater discharges. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-4 |
In the DeCew Falls IPZ-1s the application of agricultural source material (ASM) to land; the storage & handling of ASM; and livestock grazing/pasturing, farm animal yards and outdoor confinement areas are all designated for the purposes of Section 58 (risk management plans) of the Clean Water Act. All new and existing occurrences of these activities shall require a Risk Management Plan which shall contain appropriate risk management measures. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-5 |
All land uses except residential are designated for the purposes of Section 59 (restricted land uses) of the Clean Water Act in the DeCew Falls IPZ-1s, where the application of agricultural source material (ASM) to land; the storage & handling of ASM; and livestock grazing/pasturing, farm animal yards and outdoor confinement areas are, or would be a significant threat.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-6 |
Within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, an Outreach and Education program shall be established by Niagara Region that promotes best management practices for the following existing and future significant threat activities: the application to land, and storage of agricultural source material; and livestock grazing/pasturing, farm animal yards, and outdoor confinement areas.
The Outreach and Education program shall be for landowners within the DeCew Falls IPZ-1s, but may be extended to the DeCew Falls IPZ-2s (Schedules DC4, DC5 and DC6). This Outreach and Education program may be implemented by Niagara Region in combination with other outreach and education programs at its discretion. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-7 |
No new or existing Category 3 Non-Agricultural Source Material application, or handling and storage, shall be permitted within the DeCew Falls IPZ-1s. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-8 |
In accordance with Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with the Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Intake Protection Zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within an Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher. This policy will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan where it applies to the Ministry of Transportation.
These signs should also be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are within the DeCew Falls IPZ-1s. For signs on the municipal roads, Niagara Region, in cooperation with the City of Thorold will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs, designed by the Province in collaboration with the Source Protection Authority.
This policy, as it applies to municipal arterial roads will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan by Niagara Region. This policy should be implemented within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-9 |
Niagara Region, and the municipalities of Port Colborne, Welland, and Thorold shall update their Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) to include the following:
Maps that show the locations of the DeCew Water Treatment Plant and associated Highway 406 and Lake Gibson Alternate intakes and the areas where this policy applies.
An up-to-date communications protocol showing the structure of command of the various agencies that would be contacted.
The ERPs shall be updated within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
|
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan will take effect on the date set by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 policies regarding restricted land uses shall take effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the Townships to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect;
e. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect; amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the Official Plan and Zoning By Laws must be amended to conform with the relevant significant threat policies and adopted by municipal council by the next five (5) year Official Plan update as required under subsection 26 of the Planning Act and the Zoning By-law within two (2) years from the adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-1.10 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the
Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written
policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where
the policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for
the circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More
detailed interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the
approved Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in
the Tables of Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or
Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall
be interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the
Act as well as any subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor
thereof. This provision is also applicable to any policy statement,
regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-1.2 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 all land uses identified within the County Official Plan and/or Area Municipal Zoning By-Laws, with the exception of residential uses other than proposed plans of subdivision or condominium, that are located within an area where sections 57 and/or 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 applies in Well Head Protection Areas (WHPA) A, B or C and where there is a significant drinking water threat, are hereby designated for the purposes of section 59 (Restricted Land Uses). Within these designated land use categories and areas, a notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act, 2006 shall be required prior to approval of any Planning Act or Building Permit application. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-10.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid and/or an organic solvent, excluding by an individual for personal or family use, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are significant drinking water threats, the activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-10.2 |
To ensure any future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquid and/or an organic solvent, excluding by an individual for personal or family use, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-10.3 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPLs) and/or an organic solvent cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the Townships with the assistance of the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should develop and produce an education and outreach program for municipal delivery targeted towards:
a) an individual for personal or family use to promote the use of non-toxic products and additional opportunities for participation in household hazardous waste disposal.
b) industrial and commercial users to promote the use of alternatives to DNAPLs (including non-toxic products), pollution prevention approaches, Best Management Practices, and safe disposal in industries. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-11.1 |
To ensure the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in de-icing of
aircraft never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity
would be a significant drinking water threat, the Townships shall recommend
through the review of submitted Environmental Assessments that industry best
management practices be implemented for any future airports where there could
be runoff containing de-icing chemicals. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-13.1 |
To ensure the existing or future activity that takes water from an aquifer without returning the water to the same aquifer or that reduces the recharge of an
aquifer ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in WHPA-Q1
or WHPA-Q2, municipalities responsible for supplying water within WHPA-Q1 and WHPA-Q2 shall develop and/or update Water Conservation Plans to ensure
they are an effective tool to support sustainable water use. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-13.10 |
To ensure any existing and future activity that takes water from an aquifer
without returning the water to the same aquifer or that reduces the recharge of
an aquifer ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water
threat, where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in
WHPA-Q1 or WHPA-Q2, the Townships, with support from the Grand River
Conservation Authority, will develop and implement an education and outreach
programs to make property owners and businesses aware of the following within
t WHPA-Q1 and WHPA-Q2:
a. The importance of protecting water supplies;
b. Actions that should be taken to protect drinking water supplies;
c. The importance of the creation of a water conservation plan to reduce
water consumption; and
d. The financial incentive programs and projects for which they could be
eligible under future funding of the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship
Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-13.8 |
To ensure any existing and future activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where
the activity is or would be a significant threat within the WHPA-Q2, The County of Dufferin, should consider local water quantity availability when developing
population and employment forecasts in municipalities that encompass the WHPA-Q2. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-13.9 |
To ensure any existing and future activity that takes water from an aquifer
without returning the water to the same aquifer ceases to be and/or never
becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is, or would be, a
significant drinking water threat in WHPA-Q1, and where municipalities share a
water source within WHPA-Q1, the municipalities shall develop a Joint Municipal
Water Supply Management model within three (3) years of the Source
Protection Plan taking effect to facilitate the planning and management of water
supply sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-2.1 |
To ensure the following existing and future activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, the Townships in collaboration with the Grand River Conservation Authority, Source Protection Authorities, and Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, where practical, will develop and implement education and outreach programs for the following activities:
a. Establishment, Operation or Maintenance of a Waste Disposal Site, within the Meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act
b. The application of agricultural source material to land
c. The storage of agricultural source material
d. The application of commercial fertilizer
e. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
f. The application of pesticide to land
g. The handling and storage of pesticide
h. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard. Such programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of drinking water threats and promotion of best management practices.
The Education and Outreach program may consist of targeted mailings to specific property owners, inserts with current Township mailings, inclusion of Source Water Protection information in existing education and outreach programs and/or information available on the Townships� websites. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-5.2 |
To ensure existing and future onsite sewage systems and onsite holding tanks cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the County of Dufferin will implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required under the Ontario Building Code Act. Inspections should be prioritized based on the proximity to the drinking water supply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-5.3 |
To ensure future onsite sewage systems and onsite holding tanks never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities would be, significant drinking water threats, and are governed under the Building Code Act, the creation of new lots requiring onsite sewage systems shall only be permitted if the Townships are satisfied that the current requirements have been met and confirmed that the lot size and site conditions are adequate to accommodate the system so it does not become a significant drinking water threat. The hydrogeological assessment to determine appropriate development density shall be conducted by a licensed professional. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-7.2 |
To ensure the existing and future storage of fuel equal to or less than
2,500 Litres, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the
Township will develop and implement an education and outreach program for
homeowners with identified home fuel oil tanks outlining the requirements under
the fuel oil code by the Technical Standards and Safety Authority and best
management practices that could be implemented. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-8.1 |
To ensure the future storage of snow never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat on municipal or provincial properties, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-8.2 |
To ensure the existing and future storage of snow ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat on commercial or industrial properties, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan shall include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the storage of snow ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-9.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application of road salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, excluding a single family residence, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. In the specific cases outlined below, the content shall be based upon, but not limited to, the following:
a. For un-assumed roads and private parking lots (excluding a single family residence), the Risk Management Plans shall include a goal to minimize salt usage through alternative measures, while maintaining public safety.
b. For public roads, the Risk Management Plans shall include provisions for:
the reduction of salt usage through Best Management Practices such as alternative de-icer materials (with lower sodium and chloride) and/or contemporary technology; and
the use of certified contractors for the application of road salt.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-9.2 |
To ensure the existing and future application of road salt ceases to be or never
becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a
significant drinking water threat, the Townships, in collaboration with the
Conservation Authority, shall develop and implement an education and outreach
program targeting those who apply road salt. The program will promote the
importance of proper road salt application. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-9.3 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of road salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-CW-9.6 |
To ensure the existing and future application, handling and storage of road salt
on single family residence properties ceases to be or never becomes a
significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant
drinking water threat, the Townships, in collaboration with the Conservation
Authorities, where practical, will develop and implement an education and
outreach program. Such a programs may include, but not necessarily be limited
to, increasing awareness and understanding of drinking water threats and
promotion of best management practices.
The Education and Outreach program may consist of targeted mailings to
specific property owners, inserts with current Township mailings, inclusion of
Source Water Protection information in existing education and outreach
programs and/or information available on the Townships’ websites. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-1.3 |
The Townships and County of Dufferin will amend their Official Plan, Zoning By-Laws and/or municipal planning documents, where applicable, to:
- Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act 2006 and local threats identified in the Assessment Report would be significant;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any use and associated activities as defined in municipal planning documents that are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat are required to conform with all applicable- - Source Protection Plan policies provided herein and, as such, may be restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies;
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform to the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-12.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application, handling, and storage of non-agricultural source material cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats in Wellhead Protection Areas A with a vulnerability score of 10, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as applicable, shall prohibit these activities within the applicable approval processes in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act or the Environmental Protection Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-12.2 |
To ensure the existing and future application, handling, and storage of non-agricultural source material cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats in Wellhead Protection Area B with a vulnerability score of 10, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks as applicable, shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend, Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plans in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or Environmental Compliance Approvals in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated, that when implemented, reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-13.2 |
To ensure the existing or future activity that takes water from an aquifer without returning the water to the same aquifer ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat in WHPA-Q1, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Permit to Take Water that governs the existing or future taking includes appropriate terms and conditions. The following shall be considered by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks:
Municipal water supply requirements will be met on a sustainable basis
The water taking will not affect the ability of the aquifer to meet municipal water supply requirements; and
The water taking will not adversely impact hydrological integrity.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-13.3 |
To ensure any future activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer does not become a significant drinking water threat, where the activity would be a significant threat within WHPA-Q2 the municipality shall only permit new major developments or site alterations (excluding single detached residential) where an assessment of the impacts of the development on recharge can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the municipality that the water balance can maintain pre-development recharge to the greatest extent feasible through best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-13.6 |
To ensure any future activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is or would be a significant threat within WHPA-Q2, the County of Dufferin, in consultation with the lower tier municipalities, shall consider municipal water supply servicing constraints when approving settlement area expansions within WHPA-Q2. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-4.1 |
To ensure the existing and future establishment, operation, or maintenance of a Waste Disposal Site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, the exception of the application of untreated septage to land, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review or prepare and, as necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-4.2 |
To ensure the existing and future application of hauled sewage to land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, activities that are subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval within the meaning of the Environmental Protection Act where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approval process.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-5.1 |
To ensure the existing and future establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks will review and, as necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-6.1 |
To ensure the existing and future storage of agricultural source material ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that all Nutrient Management Plans and/ or Strategies prepared under the Nutrient Management Act include, as appropriate, terms and conditions to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-6.2 |
To ensure the future storage of agricultural source material never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Townships and the County of Dufferin will include policies in their municipal planning documents including a refined definition of ""agricultural uses ; that would require any new storage facility to be designed in accordance with the standards outlined in the Nutrient Management Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-7.1 |
To ensure the following activities never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Townships and the County of Dufferin will include policies in their municipal planning documents including a specific definition applicable to all zones in each Township Zoning By-law that would require any new development or storage facility to be designed and maintained using current best management practices:
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
The handling and storage of pesticide
The handling and storage of fuel
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-8.3 |
To ensure the future storage of snow never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Townships and the County of Dufferin shall include policies in their municipal planning documents to ensure site plan approvals require any new storage facility to be designed and maintained using current best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-MC-9.5 |
To ensure the future application of road salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Townships and County of Dufferin are encouraged to require salt impact assessments as part of a complete application for development which includes new roads and parking lots.
Such assessments should include but not be limited to mitigation measures regarding design of parking lots, roadways and sidewalks to minimize the need for repeat application of road salt such as reducing ponding in parking areas; directing stormwater discharge outside of vulnerable areas where possible; and provisions to hire certified contractors. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-1.12 |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a Wellhead Protection Area along highways, or railway lines,
a. The County of Dufferin and Townships are requested to incorporate the location of Wellhead Protection Areas into their emergency response plans to protect drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways or rail lines.
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-1.13 |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006 that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway are managed to reduce the risk to drinking water sources or do not become a significant threat and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the Townships are requested to promote ongoing programs which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903 within all vulnerable areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-1.14 |
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and the Ministry of Natural Resources, for Prescribed Instruments for significant drinking water threats within vulnerable areas, shall advise the Townships regarding applications under review and that the Townships be provided an opportunity to provide comments on these applications. The relevant Ministry shall have due regard to the comments submitted by the Townships. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-13.4 |
To ensure any existing and future activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is or would be a significant threat within the WHPA-Q2 the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, in consultation with the Townships, is encouraged to undertake an evaluation and analysis to identify research opportunities to develop plans and take appropriate actions to promote recharge on industrial, commercial and institutional lands. This may include seeking partnerships for funding these research activities. If funding becomes available, future developments within the WHPA-Q2 may be subject to the findings of this research and monitored for effectiveness. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-13.5 |
To ensure any existing and future activity that takes water from an aquifer without returning the water to the same aquifer or that reduces the recharge of an aquifer ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in WHPA-Q1 or WHPA-Q2, and where municipalities share a water source within a WHPA-Q1 or WHPA-Q2, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, in collaboration with the Ministries of Infrastructure, Municipal Affairs and Housing, and Natural Resources, is encouraged to support municipal efforts that focus on finding collaborative and mutually beneficial solutions to address water servicing constraints. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-13.7 |
To ensure the existing or future activity that takes water from an aquifer without returning the water to the same aquifer ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat in WHPA-Q1, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should adopt and fund the on-going maintenance of the Tier 3 numerical models, including:
a. Supporting environmental monitoring efforts to address data gaps and improve simulations of cumulative effects; and
b. Incorporate new information as appropriate into the Tier 3 models to provide decision makers with a tool to make informed water management decisions.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-14.1 |
To ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O.Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Standards and Safety Authority Act or under the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, the Canada Energy Regulator and Ontario Energy Board in their consideration of any pipelines within vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, are encouraged to ensure the applicant has complied with or included appropriate design standards and monitoring and maintenance practices, where applicable, to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-3.1 |
To ensure existing significant drinking water threat activities cease to be a significant drinking water threat, the Grand River Conservation Authority, in consultation with the Townships, will deliver available cost share incentive programs as long as the Grand River Conservation Authority has such programs and outreach staff available, and work with affected land owners to implement best management practices for the following activities:
The application of agricultural source material to land
The storage of agricultural source material
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-3.2 |
To ensure existing and future significant drinking water threat activities cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, shall be providing available cost share incentive programs for the implementation of the applicable Source Protection Plan policies.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-5.4 |
To ensure future septic systems and holding tanks never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks should develop guidelines for managing drinking water threats from onsite sewage systems with subsurface disposal of effluent, as regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act for distribution to developers, municipalities and other interested or affected parties. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-5.5 |
To ensure future onsite sewage systems and onsite holding tanks never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks should develop and produce education and outreach materials for delivery by local municipalities to landowners with onsite sewage systems governed under the Building Code Act within significant threat areas that explains the rationale for the maintenance inspection program and the benefits of regular maintenance and properly functioning septic systems.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-AEG-NB-9.4 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of road salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks should develop and produce educational information targeted to all sectors, and locally distributed by the Townships to provide education and outreach to:
a. Residences and small businesses about the impact of salt on municipal drinking water and what they can do to reduce their use of salt; and
b. Commercial and industrial sectors to address the importance of source protection planning and the impacts of road salt on drinking water sources, with the key message being responsible salt storage and application, and the use of contemporary technology. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall take effect on the date set by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before relevant policies within the this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding restricted land uses shall take effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the Town to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat and where they are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Town and subject to available funding, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
e. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before relevant policies within the this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Official Plan and Zoning By Laws must be amended to conform with the relevant significant threat policies and adopted by municipal council by the next five (5) year Official Plan update as required under subsection 26(1) of the Planning Act or within five (5) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-1.15 |
To address Conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Town shall:
a. Continue to support environmental investigation, remediation and redevelopment; and
b. Implement an education program on drinking water issues associated with contaminated sites including the protection of drinking water sources and
the use of the Record of Site Condition process as a best management practice to address condition sites. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-1.18 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text
and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or
Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be
interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as
well as any subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof.
This provision is also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or
guideline issued by the Province or the municipality.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-1.2 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purposes of Section 57 and 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official is required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act (as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07 Section 62), or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purpose of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the building official, as the case may be, that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-1.4 |
The Town, in collaboration with Conservation Authorities and other bodies where
possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs directed
at any, or all, significant drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water
Act, 2006, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the
Town and subject to available funding. Such programs may include, but not
necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of significant
drinking water threats and promotion of best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-1.5 |
The Town, in collaboration with other bodies and levels of government where
possible, may develop and implement incentive programs directed at various
significant threat activities prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006, where
such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Town, subject to
available funding. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-10.1 |
To ensure any new airport where there could be runoff containing de-icing chemicals never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-2.2 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-2.4 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. The storage of waste shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 within a WHPA-A and shall be prohibited.
b. This activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 within a WHPA-B or C and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-3.1 |
To ensure any existing or new onsite sewage system with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County of Dufferin shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program. Inspections should be prioritized based on the proximity to the drinking water supply.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-4.1 |
To ensure:
The existing application of agricultural source material to land within a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A or B with a vulnerability equal to ten (10); and
The future application of agricultural source material to land within a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) B with a vulnerability equal to ten (10),
ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
Where such drinking water threat activities have been identified and confirmed, the Risk Management Official shall establish a Risk Management Plan with the persons undertaking the application of agricultural source material to land. The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a nutrient management plan and/or strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-4.2 |
To ensure the future application of agricultural source material to land within a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the application of agricultural source material shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-5.1 |
To ensure the:
Existing and future storage of agricultural source material;
Existing and future application of non-agricultural source material to land;
Existing and future handling and storage of non-agricultural source material;
Future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer; and
Future handling and storage of pesticides
cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where such activities are or would be significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-5.2 |
To ensure the:
Existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land;
Existing and future application of pesticides to land;
Existing handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
Existing handling and storage of pesticides; and
Existing or future use of land as livestock grazing, or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard
cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan for the application of commercial fertilizer will generally be based on the requirements of a nutrient management plan and/or strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-6.1 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of road salt and the storage of snow within a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A never become a significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-6.2 |
To ensure:
any existing handling and storage of road salt and the storage of snow within Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10); and
any new handling and storage of road salt and the storage of snow within Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10)
cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-7.1 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of fuel less than or equal
to 2500 Litres ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Town
shall develop and implement an education and outreach program outlining the
requirements of proper maintenance for fuel storage and the steps to be taken if
there is a spill or leak detected. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-7.2 |
To ensure the handling and storage of fuel more than 2,500 litres ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat,
Existing activities in WHPA A and WHPA B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required
Future activities in WHPA B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-7.3 |
To ensure any future handling and storage of fuel more than 2,500 Litres within a WHPA A never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-8.1 |
To ensure any existing handling or storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural purposes within a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-8.2 |
To ensure any new handling or storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial institutional and agricultural purposes within Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-8.3 |
To ensure any existing or new handling or storage of a dense non-aqueous phase
liquid ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where
such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Town shall
develop and implement an education and outreach program to encourage the use
of alternative products, where available, and the proper handling/storage and
disposal procedures for these products.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-9.1 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-CW-9.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of an organic solvent never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-MC-1.14 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall:
- Ensure that all Prescribed Instruments issued for Condition sites include terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the risk to drinking water sources is managed. Appropriate conditions may include requirements for source control, remediation to provincial standards, monitoring and Contaminant Management Plans;
- Ensure that Prescribed Instruments include a condition requiring the instrument holder to report on the actions taken and the status of the site to the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks, Source Protection Authority and the municipality on an annual basis; and
- Provide to the Town of Grand Valley a copy of the new or revised Prescribed Instrument.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-MC-1.3 |
The Town and County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws to:
Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies; and
Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-MC-2.1 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, ensure that the waste disposal site is managed to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-MC-2.3 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-MC-3.2 |
To ensure any existing or new onsite sewage system with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that these onsite sewage systems are managed to reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources.
The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years, and upgrading of these onsite sewage systems to current standards, if necessary. In addition, the terms and conditions may include the proponent/applicant to provide annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority and County of any monitoring and inspection programs required and their results.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-MC-3.3 |
To ensure any existing or new sewage treatment plant with effluent discharge or storage of sewage ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-MC-3.4 |
To ensure any existing or new sanitary sewer and related pipes and discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water. The terms and conditions may include requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake regular maintenance and inspections. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-NB-1.16 |
To ensure the protection of drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes, the Town, County of Dufferin, and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks are encouraged to incorporate the Wellhead Protection Area mapping into their Emergency Response Plan and Spills Action Centre mapping, respectively. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-NB-1.17 |
The Town is requested to support ongoing programs, which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903, within all vulnerable areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-NB-1.6 |
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, under the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-NB-1.7 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from an existing activity, the Grand River Conservation Authority, in consultation with the Town and/or County, will deliver available cost share incentive programs as long as the Grand River Conservation Authority has such programs and outreach staff available, and work with affected land owners to implement best management practices for the following activities:
The application of agricultural source material to land;
The storage of agricultural source material; and
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-GV-NB-11.1 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water due to the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the pipeline proponent, the Canada Energy Regulator, and Ontario Energy Board, are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the Town the location of any new proposed pipeline within the Town and/or Source Protection Area. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-1.1 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall take effect on the date set by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before relevant policies within the this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding restricted land uses shall take effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the Township to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat and where they are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Township and subject to available funding, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
e. For Section 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before relevant policies within the this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
f. For Sections 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Official Plan and Zoning By Laws must be amended to conform with the relevant significant threat policies and adopted by municipal council by the next five (5) year Official Plan update as required under subsection 26(1) of the Planning Act or within five (5) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-1.16 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean
Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text
and Schedules.
a) The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b) Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or
Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be
interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as
well as any subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof.
This provision is also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or
guideline issued by the Province or the municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-1.17 |
Despite the definition of existing, where a policy in this plan prohibits a ""future"" threat activity, the policy for managing "existing" drinking water threats activities applies in the following cases even though those activities will commence after the Source Protection Plan comes into effect:
A drinking water threat activity that is related to a development proposal where a complete application was made under the Planning Act or Condominium Act prior to the day the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. The policy for "existing" drinking water threats also applies to any further applications required under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, or Prescribed Instruments to implement the development proposal.
A drinking water threat activity that is related to an application for a Building Permit, which has been submitted in compliance with Division C 1.3.1.3 (5) of the Ontario Building Code Act or a development permit under the Niagara Escarpment Development Control Area prior to the day the Source Protection Plan comes into effect.
A drinking water threat activity that is related to an application made for the issuance or amendment of a Prescribed Instrument prior to the day the Source Protection Plan comes into effect.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-1.2 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purposes of Section 57 and 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official is required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act (as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07 Section 62), or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purpose of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the building official, as the case may be, that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-1.4 |
The Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the
Township, and other bodies wherever possible, may develop and implement
education and outreach programs directed at any, or all, significant drinking water
threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006, where such programs are
deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Township and subject to available
funding. Such programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing
awareness and understanding of significant drinking water threats and promotion
of best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-1.5 |
The Township, in collaboration with other bodies and levels of government where
possible, may develop and implement incentive programs directed at various
significant threat activities prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006, where
such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Township,
subject to available funding. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-10.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of pesticides ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan, at a minimum, should be based on contemporary standards and include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-10.2 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of pesticides never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-10.4 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of pesticides ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target those handling or storing pesticides. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-11.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of road salt and storage of snow ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
A Risk Management Plan for the handling and storage of road salt, at a minimum, should include terms and conditions that mirror a salt management plan, and comply with contemporary standards to ensure the handling and storage of road salt ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
A Risk Management Plan for the storage of snow, at a minimum, should be based on contemporary standards to ensure that the storage of snow and associated run-off ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-11.2 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of road salt and storage of snow never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. Except in emergency situations as determined by the risk management official and the public works department, emergency snow storage will be permitted only outside of WHPA-A. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-11.5 |
The Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target the handling and storage or road salt and snow where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat. The future program will promote pollution prevention by explaining the importance of proper salt storage and run-off management of salt and snow to safe guard water supplies. The program will be carried out in consultation with the Association of Municipalities Ontario and the Ontario Good Roads Association. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-12.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of fuel ceases to be a significant
drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat,
the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the
Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall develop and implement an
education and outreach program outlining the requirements of proper
maintenance for fuel storage and the steps to be taken if there is a spill or leak
detected. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-12.2 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of fuel, except for personal domestic use, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan will include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the handling and storage of fuel ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, and at a minimum, complies with contemporary standards. The Risk Management Plan may include such conditions as:
secondary containment;
spill/leak detection (monitoring processes); and
collision protection (bollards).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-12.3 |
To ensure any future handling and storage of fuel never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-13.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (excluding incidental volumes for personal/domestic use) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan, at a minimum, should promote above-ground storage and handling, and include terms and conditions to ensure the handling and storage of DNAPLs ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-13.2 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (excluding incidental volumes for personal/domestic use) never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-13.4 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid
ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a
significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection
Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible,
shall develop and implement an education and outreach program to encourage
the use of alternative products, where available, and the proper handling/storage
and disposal procedures for these products. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-14.1 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan, at a minimum, should be based on contemporary standards and include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-14.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of an organic solvent never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-14.4 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be a
significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking
water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration
with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall develop and
implement an education and outreach program to encourage the use of alternative
products, where available, and the proper handling/storage and disposal
procedures for these products. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-16.2 |
To ensure any existing or future outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard which does not require approval under the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-16.3 |
To ensure any existing or future livestock grazing or pasturing, where the number of animals on the land at any time is sufficient to generate nutrients at an annual rate that is greater than 0.5 nutrient units/acre, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-16.5 |
To ensure any existing livestock grazing or pasturing, outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target existing livestock grazing or pasturing, outdoor confinement areas or farm animal yards. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-2.2 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval (PCB waste storage and the storage of hazardous liquid industrial waste, excluding the storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste (O.Reg 347)), ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, and include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-2.4 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval (PCB waste storage and the storage of hazardous liquid industrial waste, excluding the storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste (O.Reg 347)), never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-2.7 |
The Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the
Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall develop and implement
education and outreach programs to address any existing waste disposal sites,
within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, including the
storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of
hazardous waste, (O. Reg. 347), where this activity is a significant drinking water
threat, that do not require an Environmental Compliance Approval. The program
should focus on the proper handling, storage and disposal of wastes to ensure
that these activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-3.2 |
The Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the
Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall develop and implement
education and outreach programs to address any existing system that collects,
stores or transmits, treats or disposes of sewage, where such an activity is a
significant drinking water threat. The program will promote the importance of
source water protection, the proper disposal of hazardous waste and proper care
and maintenance of septic systems.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-3.3 |
To ensure any existing or new onsite sewage system with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County of Dufferin shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program. Inspections should be prioritized based on the proximity to the drinking water supply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-4.1 |
To ensure the existing or future application of agricultural source material to land, where the Nutrient Management Act does not require an approval, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-4.3 |
To ensure the existing application of agricultural source material to land ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target those applying agricultural source material to land. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-5.1 |
To ensure the existing storage of agricultural source material, for those not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan, at a minimum, should be based on contemporary standards, reflect appropriate nutrient management practices, and ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-5.3 |
To ensure the future storage of agricultural source material, for those not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-5.6 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of agricultural source material ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target those handling or storing agricultural source material. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-6.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application, or handling and storage of category 1 non-agricultural source material, where the Nutrient Management Act and Environmental Protection Act do not require an approval, ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-6.4 |
To ensure the existing application, handling or storage of non-agricultural source material ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target those applying, handling or storing non-agricultural source material. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-7.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land, for those not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan should require fertilizers to be applied using best agronomic practices on the advice of a certified crop advisor, that soil tests (NPK) be carried out and that proper farm practices regarding crop rotation be applied, as appropriate. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-7.3 |
To ensure the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target those applying commercial fertilizer to land.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-8.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, for those not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards and should require:
liquid fertilizer to be stored in double-walled tanks or secondary containment facilities, with collision protection, and
dry fertilizer to be stored undercover on impervious floor surfaces with no drainage outlets so that the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-8.2 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-8.4 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of commercial fertilizer ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target those handling or storing commercial fertilizer. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-9.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application of pesticides to land ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The Risk Management Plan, at a minimum, should be based on contemporary standards, and should require that pesticides be applied by a certified or registered professional in keeping with prescribed label rates to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-CW-9.2 |
To ensure the existing application of pesticide to land ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Nottawasaga Valley Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township, and other bodies wherever possible, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks where possible to target those applying pesticide to land. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-1.3 |
The Township and County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws to:
a. Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
b. Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies; and
c. Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-10.3 |
To ensure the future storage of pesticides never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future pesticide storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-11.3 |
To ensure the future storage of road salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future road salt storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-11.4 |
To ensure the future storage of snow never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future snow storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-12.4 |
To ensure the future storage fuel never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future fuel storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-13.3 |
To ensure the future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future dense non-aqueous phase liquid storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-14.3 |
To ensure the future storage of organic solvents never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future organic solvent storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-16.1 |
To ensure any existing or future outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard which requires approval under the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall prohibit this activity to ensure it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-16.4 |
To ensure any future outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future outdoor confinement areas or farm animal yards. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-2.1 |
To ensure any existing or future application of hauled sewage to land, that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval within the meaning of the Environmental Protection Act, ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-2.3 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-2.5 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, ensure that the waste disposal site is managed to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-2.6 |
To ensure the establishment of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act (excluding storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste (O.Reg 347) and storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste) never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit a related land use. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-2.8 |
To ensure the existing disposal of mine tailings, that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval within the meaning of the Environmental Protection Act, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the disposal of mine tailings includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-2.9 |
To ensure the future disposal of mine tailings that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval within the meaning of the Environmental Protection Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.1 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to locate new (private or municipal) sewage system infrastructure, wherever possible, outside of a vulnerable area where it would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.10 |
To ensure the future establishment, operation or maintenance of sanitary sewers and related pipes never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall incorporate appropriate terms and conditions into the Environmental Compliance Approval to ensure the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.11 |
To ensure any existing or future establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of stormwater, cease to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, will ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. Such conditions may include:
a) permitting the expansion of an existing facility where the expansion does not pose a significant drinking water threat; or
b) permitting retrofits to existing facilities where the retrofit will discharge the stormwater outside of the significant drinking water threat area.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.12 |
To ensure the future establishment of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of stormwater, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to ensure the design of new stormwater management facilities reduces the risk of contaminating drinking water, and directs the discharge of stormwater outside of vulnerable areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.4 |
To ensure any existing onsite sewage system with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review or prepare and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that these onsite sewage systems are managed to reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources.
The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years, and upgrading of these septic systems to current standards, if necessary. In addition, the terms and conditions may include the proponent/applicant to provide annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority and County of any monitoring and inspection programs required and their results.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.5 |
To ensure new onsite sewage system with a design flow greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks hall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.6 |
To ensure any new onsite sewage system with a design flow greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit a related land use.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.7 |
To ensure new small on-site sewage systems never become a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall permit new development, only where the lot sizes for any proposed development that would include a small on-site sewage system is based on the most current version of the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks’ guidelines for individual on-site servicing. Lots of record that exist on the effective date of the source protection plan are exempted. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.8 |
To ensure any existing sewage treatment plant, sanitary sewers and related pipes, sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge to surface water, and sewage treatment plant effluent discharge (including lagoons) cease to be significant drinking water threats, where such activities are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs these activities includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-3.9 |
To ensure any future establishment, operation or maintenance of a sewage treatment plant, sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge to surface water, and sewage treatment plant effluent discharge (including lagoons) never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals Process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-4.2 |
To ensure the existing or future application of agricultural source material to land, for those phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall prohibit this activity to ensure it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-5.2 |
To ensure the existing storage of agricultural source material, for those phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that the nutrient management plan or strategy that governs the storage of agricultural source materials include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-5.4 |
To ensure the future storage of agricultural source material, for those phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall prohibit this activity to ensure it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-5.5 |
To ensure the future storage of agricultural source material never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township, and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future agricultural source material storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-6.2 |
To ensure the existing and future application, or handling and storage of category 1, 2 or 3 non-agricultural source material, where the Nutrient Management Act and Environmental Protection Act requires an approval, ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and/or the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-6.3 |
To ensure the future storage of non-agricultural source material never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future non-agricultural source material storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-7.2 |
To ensure the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land, for those phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that the Nutrient Management Plan or strategy that governs the application of commercial fertilizer to land includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-MC-8.3 |
To ensure the future storage of commercial fertilizer never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and the County of Dufferin, where applicable, shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future commercial fertilizer storage facilities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-NB-1.14 |
To ensure the protection of drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes, the Township, County of Dufferin, and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks are encouraged to incorporate the Wellhead Protection Area mapping into their Emergency Response Plan and Spills Action Centre mapping, respectively. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-NB-1.15 |
The Township is requested to support ongoing programs, which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903, within all vulnerable areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-NB-1.6 |
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, under the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-NB-1.7 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from an existing activity, the Grand River Conservation Authority, in consultation with the Township and/or County, will deliver available cost share incentive programs as long as the Grand River Conservation Authority has such programs and outreach staff available, and work with affected land owners to implement best management practices for the following activities:
The application of agricultural source material to land;
The storage of agricultural source material; and
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-NB-15.1 |
To ensure that future runoff containing de-icing chemical never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the airport authority, in their consideration of any new airport facilities are encouraged to include appropriate design standards and management practices to prevent run-off from airport de-icing facilities from becoming a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DC-M-NB-17.1 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water due to the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the pipeline proponent, the Canada Energy Regulator, and Ontario Energy Board, are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the Township the location of any new proposed pipeline within the Township and/or Source Protection Area.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DeICE-1 |
Airport Authorities or operators, in their consideration of any new airport facilities in areas where threats to drinking water would be significant, are encouraged to include appropriate design standards and management practices to prevent run-off from airport de-icing facilities from becoming a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
DEICE-1-LB-S57 |
The future management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft and originating in a regional or national airport is designated as prohibited under Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where the threat would be significant as described in Appendix B. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DeICE-2 |
By February 1 of each year, the local SPA shall collect from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, data on the number of environmental assessments initiated for new airport facilities within vulnerable areas where the run-off of chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
DELETE - SSM-SGRA-F-4.0 |
|
Sault Ste Marie |
Low |
|
2 |
False |
|
DEM-1 |
See DEM-1-b (Policy Database ID 4777) for Moderate Risk Level.
Within the Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 where a water taking is or would be a significant water quantity threat the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure each water taking threat ceases to be, or does not become significant, through actions the Director considers appropriate on a case by case basis, such as:
1) Reviewing all existing Permits To Take Water, located within WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level, in consultation with the other Ministries (as required), the affected municipality, relevant conservation authorities, and permit holders, and amend the permits where necessary to ensure:
a) that municipal water supply requirements for the allocated and planned quantity (per the current approved population and employment projections of the most recent Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe) will be met on a sustainable basis; and
b) that the hydrological integrity of municipal wells in the vulnerable areas will be maintained.
2) Issuing Permits To Take Water for new or increased takings, located within WHPA-Q1 with moderate or significant risk levels, only if it can be satisfactorily demonstrated, using the findings of the most recently approved Tier 3 Water Budget Model and other available data, where appropriate, that the taking:
a) can be maintained on a sustainable basis;
b) will not affect the ability of the aquifer to meet the municipal water supply requirements for the current and planned service capacity; and
c) will ensure the hydrological integrity of municipal wells will be maintained.
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-10 |
York Region shall develop and implement a drought management plan using the Tier 3 water quantity risk assessment findings and modelling tool to prevent consumptive demand from becoming significant.
Timeline:
T-18: The policy shall be implemented immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-2 |
Within the Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 where a water taking is or would be a significant water quantity threat, the relevant Planning Approval Authority shall ensure water taking does not become a significant drinking water threat by:
1) Only permitting new development if the new development does not require a new or amended Permit to Take Water;
2) Only providing final approval for new development that requires a new or amended Permit to Take Water once the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks has determined that the proposed taking will not become a significant water quantity threat;
3) Only approving settlement area expansions within WHPA-Q1 as part of a municipal comprehensive review where the applicable provincial planning criteria have been met and the following has been demonstrated:
a) the aquifer has sufficient capacity to sustainably provide municipal water services to the expanded settlement area;
b) the expansion will not adversely impact the aquifers ability to meet the municipal water supply requirements for current and planned service capacity, for other permitted takings, or for wastewater receiving bodies; and
c) the hydrological integrity of municipal wells will be maintained. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-3 |
Within a Tier 3 Water Budget vulnerable areas identified as having significant water quantity threats the Provincial Ministries specified below should undertake the following to ensure the provision and distribution of water supply for municipal population and employment growth forecasts does not create a new or increase an existing significant water quantity threat:
1) The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing in consultation with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and any affected municipalities should use the Tier 3 Water Budget information and other data available, to ensure that municipal Official Plan growth forecasts and distributions will not result in creating or worsening a significant water quantity threat, given water quantity constraints identified in Tier 3 Water Budget model areas; and
2) The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing should take into consideration water quantity constraints identified through Tier 3 water budgets, and other data available, during its review of the population forecasts contained in the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, in consultation with relevant municipalities.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-4 |
Municipalities responsible for the production, treatment, and storage of water, who have a municipal well and/or whose residents are served by a municipal water supply within the Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 shall develop and/or update Water Conservation Plans to ensure they are an effective tool to support sustainable water quantity by reducing consumption and therefore the demand for water.
Timeline:
T-16:The policy shall be initiated within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-5 |
Municipalities responsible for the production, treatment and storage of water and/or jurisdictional lands within a Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 identified as having significant water quantity threats shall undertake the following education and outreach initiatives to help ensure water supplies are protected and increase the effectiveness of water conservation efforts in their jurisdictions to reduce consumption and demand by:
1) Implementing education and outreach programs to ensure that property owners and businesses are aware of:
a) their role in protecting water supplies and conserving water;
b) actions that can be taken to protect water supplies and use less water; and
c) financial incentive programs and projects that may be eligible for funding under future funding of the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program; or
2) Reviewing any similar programs that may already exist and update them where necessary to ensure their effectiveness.
3) The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should provide municipalities with a list of appropriate education and outreach materials that provide information and guide actions that can be taken to reduce the usage of drinking water for delivery by the municipality.
Timeline:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-6 |
The Dufferin County municipalities that share a water source within a Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 identified as having significant water quantity threats shall develop a Joint Municipal Water Supply Management model, and implement within 3 years of approval of the Source Protection Plan. This management model shall facilitate the planning and management of water supply sources to ensure sustainability of a long term water supply in each municipality and ensure that water quality and quantity is maintained or improved such that activities cease to be, or do not become, significant drinking water threats in the WHPA-Q1. The municipalities shall report to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, on the options and proposed management model within 1 year of the approval of the Source Protection Plan.
|
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-7 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, in collaboration with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and other affected provincial ministries and agencies, as required, should initiate meetings with the Dufferin County municipalities that share a water source within a Tier 3 WHPA-Q1 identified as having significant water quality and quantity threats, to support the municipalities in developing mutually beneficial solutions to address water quantity and quality constraints within 1 year of approval of the Source Protection Plan. And further, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should provide technical support to the municipalities.
Timeline: See policy |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-8 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should adopt and fund a Tier 3 Water Budget Model in a WHPA-Q1 identified as having a moderate or significant risk level and undertake the following to ensure it is maintained as the primary model to review existing and future Permits To Take Water, to allow municipalities and other Provincial Ministries (i.e., Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and Ministry of Infrastructure) to evaluate growth projections and distributions, and to facilitate the review of planning applications by municipalities where necessary to ensure that these activities cease to be, or do not become significant drinking water threats:
1) Through the Permit To Take Water program, require municipal takers in WHPA-Q1 to monitor water quantity and supply data on a regular basis to assist in the upkeep of the model to determine any increase or reduction in significant water quantity threats;
2) Use the model with the most up to date data as an analysis and decision making tool; and
3) When necessary, contribute to funding for new continuous flow gauging stations in key surface water features and enhance conservation authorities existing Hydrometric Network in WHPA-Q1 to monitor long term trends in surface water quantity, study impacts of urbanization and climate change on aquifer recharge, and facilitate calibration of the model.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DEM-9 |
Municipalities located within a Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level are encouraged to identify additional water sources outside of the WHPA-Q1 to reduce demand from well systems which have been identified with significant water quantity stress and to report to the Source Protection Authority within 3 years on their progress.
Timeline: See Policy |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DEMD-1 |
Where an existing or future activity in a WHPA Q1 identified as having a significant or moderate risk level takes water from an aquifer without returning the water to the same aquifer, and is a significant drinking water threat, the MOE shall ensure that the Permit to Take Water that governs the water taking includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that:
1) municipal water supply requirements will be met on a sustainable basis
2) the water taking will not affect the ability of the aquifer to meet municipal water supply requirements, and
3) hydrological integrity is not adversely affected, and that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
DEMD-2 |
Within the WHPA-Q1 identified as having a significant or moderate risk level, where the taking of water from an aquifer without returning the water to the same aquifer is or would be a significant drinking water threat, York Region, Midland, Penetanguishene and Tiny Township shall develop and implement a management plan using the water quantity risk assessment findings, modeling tool, and other available observation data to ensure consumptive demand ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
DEMD-3 |
Within a WHPA Q1 assigned a significant or moderate risk level where the taking of water from an aquifer without returning the water to the same aquifer is or would be a significant drinking water threat, municipalities responsible for the water shall develop and/or update water conservation plans to ensure they remain an effective tool to support sustainable water use. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
DEMD-4 |
Within a WHPA-Q1 where the taking of water from an aquifer is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the MOE is encouraged to adopt and fund the on-going maintenance of the Tier 3 numerical models. The on-going maintenance of the Tier 3 numerical models includes:
1) Supporting environmental monitoring efforts to address data gaps and improve simulations of cumulative impacts; and,
2) Incorporating new information as appropriate into the Tier 3 models to provide decision makers with a tool to make informed water management decisions, and to ensure the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
DEMD-5 |
MOI and MMAH should consider local water quantity availability when developing population and employment forecasts in municipalities that encompass local areas where the threat is significant. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
DEMD-6 |
MOE shall continue its water conservation outreach initiatives and undertake a program analysis to determine whether using social marketing research could optimize outreach to improve water conservation in areas where the withdrawal of water from an aquifer without returning it to the aquifer is a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
DEMD-7 |
The Dufferin County municipalities that share a water source within a Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA Q1 identified as having significant water quantity threats shall develop a Joint Municipal Water Supply Management model within 3 years of approval of the Source Protection Plan, to facilitate the planning and management of water supply sources to ensure that water quality and quantity is maintained or improved such that activities cease to be or do not become a significant drinking water quantity threat in the WHPA Q1. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
DEMD-8 |
Where municipalities share a water source within a WHPA Q1 identified as having significant drinking water threats, the MOE, in collaboration with MOI, MMAH and MNR, is encouraged to support municipal efforts that focus on finding collaborative and mutually beneficial solutions to address water servicing constraints. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
DI-1 |
The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DI-2 |
When developing new airports, the municipality shall encourage the federal and other government agencies to locate facilities for the de-icing of aircraft and the management of de-icing fluid runoff outside of areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (future).
Timeline:
T-18:The policy shall be implemented immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DNAP-1 |
Where the handling and storage of a DNAPL is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The handling and storage of a DNAPL in any quantity (excluding incidental quantities for personal use) is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (future); or
WHPA-C (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future).
2) The handling and storage of a DNAPL in any quantity (excluding incidental quantities for personal use) is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (existing); or
WHPA-C (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing).
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DNAP-2 |
The municipality shall deliver education and outreach materials and programs where the handling and storage of a DNAPL is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, targeted towards:
a) an individual for personal use to promote the use of non-toxic products and additional opportunities for participation in household hazardous waste disposal and to advise the owner/tenant about the actions to take to ensure that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat; and
b) industrial and commercial users to promote the use of alternatives to DNAPLs (including non-toxic products), pollution prevention approaches, best management practices, and safe disposal; in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (existing, future); or
WHPA-C (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future).
Where education and outreach materials prepared by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks are available, the municipality shall deliver those materials
Timeline:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DNAP-3 |
Where the handling and storage of a DNAPL is, or would be, a moderate or low drinking water threat, the municipality is encouraged to specify and promote best management practices for the handling and storage of DNAPL for ICI land uses in any of the following areas:
WHPA-D (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 4.8 and >10) (existing, future); or
HVA (existing, future).
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DNAPL-1 |
The existing handling and storage of DNAPLs (excluding incidental volumes for personal/domestic use) is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will promote above-ground storage and handling, and include terms and conditions to ensure the handling and storage of DNAPLs ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
DNAPL-1-LB-S58 |
Existing DNAPLs and Organic Solvents — Risk Management Plan
The existing handling and storage of DNAPL and organic solvent substances is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is significant as described in Appendix B. Risk Management Plans shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. Retail sales establishments are excluded from Risk Management Plan requirement. This policy applies to these DNAPL and organic solvent substances in the quantities and at the locations listed in Appendix B:
DNAPLs
Dioxane-1,4
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs)
Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) (or PERC)
Trichloroethylene (TCE)
Vinyl Chloride
Organic Solvents
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Methylene chloride (dichloromethane)
Pentachlorophenol |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DNAPL-2 |
Future handling and storage of DNAPLs in any quantity (excluding incidental volumes for personal/domestic use) is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
DNAPL-2-LB-S57 |
Future DNAPLs and Organic Solvents — Section 57 Prohibition Where the Vulnerability Score is 10
The future handling and storage of the DNAPL and organic solvent substances listed in policy DNAPL-1-LB-S58 is designated as prohibited under Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where the threat would be significant as described in Appendix B. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DNAPL-3 |
The MOE is encouraged to consider undertaking research into DNAPL alternatives that can be used to phase out their use within vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant, moderate or low drinking water threat in the Province of Ontario. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
DNAPL-3-LB-S57 |
Future DNAPLs— Section 57 Prohibition Where the Vulnerability Score is is 4 to 8 in Wellhead Protection Areas “B” and “C” in quantities greater than 25 liters.
The future handling and storage of the DNAPL listed in policy DNAPL-1-LB-S58 is designated as prohibited in quantities greater than 25 litres under section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where the threat would be significant as described in Appendix B. Retail sales establishments are excluded from this prohibition. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DNAPL-4-LB-S58 |
Future DNAPLs— Risk Management Plan Where the Vulnerability Score is 4 to 8 in Wellhead Protection Areas “B” and “C” for quantities less than 25 liters.
The future handling and storage of DNAPL under 25 litres is designated for the purposes of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is significant as described in Appendix B. Risk Management Plans shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. Retail sales establishments are excluded from the Risk Management Plan requirement. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
DOS1E-RMP |
The existing handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) and organic solvents is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act requiring Risk Management Plans in the vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant threat.
This policy applies only when 25L or more of DNAPLS and organic solvents are stored on site. Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
The risk management plan may include, but is not limited to, the following:
That DNAPLs and organic solvents be properly managed, stored, and disposed of. Relevant legislation to be followed includes: Fire Code, Building Code, City of Greater Sudbury Sewer Use By-Law, Occupational Health and Safety Act as amended from time to time;
That employees receive training on Best Management Practices for DNAPLs and organic solvents handling, storage and disposal;
Best Management Practices as found in the City of Toronto's Environmental Regulations & Best Management Practices For Automotive Repair Operations in the City of Toronto;
Appropriate containment and barriers;
The inclusion of a spill contingency plan; and
Annual inspection of the property to ensure that the Risk Management Plan is being followed.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the existing handling and storage of DNAPLs and organic solvents is a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DOS2F-s57 |
The future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) and organic solvents in amounts greater than 25L is prohibited and therefore designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant threat.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the future handling and storage of DNAPLs and organic solvents would be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
DOS3EF-EO |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall create and deliver an education program regarding the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) and organic solvents in the vulnerable areas where the activities could be a significant threat.
The program will educate residents and businesses about:
Best management practices for the handling and storage of DNAPLs and organic solvents;
Proper disposal of hazardous waste in the City of Greater Sudbury;
Non-toxic (""green ;) products that can replace DNAPLs and organic solvents; and
The new Part IV program for DNAPLs and organic solvents (s.58 Risk Management Plans for existing threats, and s.57 Prohibition for potential future threats).
The City of Greater Sudbury will consider the use of door-to-door visits to deliver the program.
Monitoring policy M4 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
DOS4EF-SA |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall evaluate its household hazardous waste disposal program and improve it as necessary to ensure that threats to municipal drinking water cease to be or do not become significant. This policy applies to the vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of DNAPLs and organic solvents could be a significant threat.
The evaluation of the program and any resulting necessary improvements shall be completed within three years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Monitoring policy M10 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan or amendment took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 policies regarding restricted land uses shall come into effect the same day the relevant policies within Source Protection Plan comes into effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the Municipality and/or the Conservation Authority to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect.
e. For Section 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan or amendment comes into effect;
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the Official Plan must be amended and adopted by Council to conform with the significant threat policies within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within Source Protection Plan comes into effect or the next Official Plan review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and the Zoning By-law within three (3) years from the adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-1.18 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean
Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text
and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats and Circumstances (swpip.ca), Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted
to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any
subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is
also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by
the Province or the Municipality. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
|
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-1.2 |
Despite the definition of existing, for the purposes of this Plan, where one or more of the following:
A complete application for development under the Planning Act or Condominium Act;
An application for Environmental Compliance Approval; or
An application for a Building Permit.
has been received by the applicable implementing body prior to the final approval date of this Source Protection Plan, a related significant drinking water threat may be permitted subject to the policies pertaining to existing threats. Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, the above noted transition policies no longer apply. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-1.3 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Section 57 or Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, or Planning Act application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act (as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07 Section 62), or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purposes of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the Chief Building Official, as the case may be, that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-1.5 |
The Municipality, in collaboration with other bodies wherever possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs directed at any, or all,
significant drinking water threats, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Municipality and subject to available funding. Such
programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of drinking water threats and promotion of best management
practices. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-10.1 |
To ensure that any existing handling and storage of pesticides ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-10.2 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of pesticides never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-12.1 |
To ensure that the future storage of snow never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-13.1 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of fuel never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-14.1 |
To ensure that any new handling and facility storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural purposes within WHPA-A never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-14.2 |
To ensure that any new handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural purposes within WHPA-B or C never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-14.3 |
To ensure that any existing or new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous
phase liquid ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the
Municipality, in consultation with the Township of Malahide, shall implement an
education and outreach program to encourage the use of alternative products
where available and the proper disposal of these liquids. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-15.1 |
To ensure that any existing handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to
be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking
water threat, the Municipality shall implement an education and outreach program
to encourage the use of alternative products where available and the proper
disposal of these liquids. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-15.2 |
To ensure that any new handling and storage of organic solvents never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat; this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-16.1 |
To ensure that future runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of
aircrafts never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity
would be a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall encourage the
Airport Authority as part of the airport approval process to use existing Federal
regulations for the proper management of the runoff from de-icing of aircrafts. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-17.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-17.2 |
To ensure that any new farm animal yard or outdoor confinement area never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where these activities would be a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-17.3 |
To ensure that an existing farm animal yard or an outdoor confinement area as defined in O. Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act for a livestock operation not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-17.5 |
To ensure that the existing or future use of land for livestock grazing, pasturing,
farm animal yard or an outdoor confinement area ceases to be or never becomes
a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are, or would be, a
significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall develop and implement an
education and outreach program targeted to farms with livestock grazing,
pasturing, farm animal yards or outdoor confinement areas within vulnerable areas
to ensure that those individuals engaged in the activity are educated in methods to
reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-2.3 |
To ensure that any existing or future establishment, operation or maintenance of a
waste disposal site, within the meaning of Part V or the Environmental Protection
Act that does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval ceases to be or
never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or
would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality will develop and
implement an education and outreach program. The program should focus on the
proper handling, storage and disposal of wastes. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-3.1 |
To ensure that any existing or new onsite sewage systems and/ or onsite sewage system holding tank, with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required under the Ontario Building Code Act. Inspections should be prioritized based on the proximity to the drinking water supply. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-4.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of agricultural source material to land within a WHPA-A ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-5.1 |
To ensure that the future storage of agricultural source material never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-5.2 |
To ensure that the existing storage of agricultural source material ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-5.3 |
To ensure that the existing or future storage of agricultural source material ceases
to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or
would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall develop and
implement an education and outreach program targeted to individuals storing
agricultural source material within vulnerable areas.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-6.2 |
To ensure that the existing or future application or storage of non-agricultural
source material on land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking
water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat,
the Municipality shall develop and implement an education and outreach program
targeted to individuals storing and applying non-agricultural source material to land
within vulnerable areas to ensure that those individuals engaged in the activity are
educated in methods to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-6.4 |
To ensure that any new handling and storage of non-agricultural source material on lands never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-7.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of nitrogen-based commercial
fertilizer to land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in Wellhead
Protection Area A where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), this activity shall be
designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is
therefore prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-7.1.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of nitrogen-based commercial
fertilizer to land ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity
is a significant drinking water threat in Wellhead Protection Area B where the
vulnerability is equal to eight (8), this activity shall be designated for the purpose of
Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be
required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-7.2 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of commercial fertilizer to land
ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this
activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall
develop and implement an education and outreach program targeted to individuals
applying commercial fertilizer to land within vulnerable areas to ensure that those
individuals engaged in the activity are educated in methods to reduce the risk to
drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-8.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future handling and storage of nitrogen-based
commercial fertilizer as defined in O.Reg. 267/03, under the Nutrient Management
Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this
activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in Wellhead Protection
Area A where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), this activity shall be designated
for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore
prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-8.2 |
To ensure that any existing or future handling and storage of commercial nitrogen-based fertilizer as defined in O.Reg. 267/03, under the Nutrient Management Act
ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant
drinking water threat in an Issue Contributing Area where the vulnerability is equal
to eight (8), this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the
Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-9.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of pesticides ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-CW-9.2 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of pesticides ceases to be or
never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would
be, a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall develop and
implement an education and outreach program targeted to individuals applying
pesticides to land within vulnerable areas to ensure that those individuals engaged
in the activity are educated in methods to reduce the risk to drinking water
sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-1.4 |
The Municipality of Bayham and Township of Malahide shall amend their Official Plans and the Zoning By-Laws to:
Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as
such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by policies in the Source Protection Plan; and
Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-11.1 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of road salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, future road salt storage facilities, where permitted by the Official Plan and zoning by-law, will only be permitted if the road salt is contained in covered roof storage facilities and a salt impact assessment and/or salt management plan has been completed to the satisfaction of the Municipality. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-17.4 |
To ensure an existing farm animal yard or an outdoor confinement area as defined in O. Reg. 267/03, for livestock operations with an existing Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, cease to be a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review and, if necessary, amend the required Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy to ensure that such Plan/Strategy incorporates measures and/or terms and conditions that, when implemented, reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-2.1 |
To ensure that the future establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-2.2 |
To ensure that any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-3.2 |
To ensure that any replacement or new onsite sewage system and/ or onsite sewage system holding tank, with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-law to direct land uses relying on these activities to a location on the same property where these activities would not be a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-3.3 |
To ensure that an existing onsite sewage system and/ or onsite sewage system holding tank, with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that these onsite sewage systems are managed to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-3.4 |
To ensure that the establishment of a new onsite sewage system and/ or onsite sewage system holding tank with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-law to prohibit new development which relies on this type of on-site sewage system. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-3.5 |
To ensure that existing or new sanitary sewers and related pipes cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to the municipal drinking water sources. The terms and conditions may include requirements for regular maintenance and inspections conducted by the proponent. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-3.6 |
To ensure that the future storage of sewage or treatment plant effluent discharges never become a significant drinking water threat, where these activities would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-3.7 |
To ensure that the existing storage of sewage or treatment plant effluent discharges cease to be significant drinking water threats, where such activities are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review, and if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to the municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-3.8 |
To ensure that any existing or new stormwater management facility that discharges stormwater never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions (for example: regular maintenance) that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to the municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-6.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of non-agricultural source material to land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs or the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as applicable, shall revoke, or not approve, any Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or any activity within the Environmental Compliance Approval process in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act that permits, or would permit, the application of non-agricultural source material within these vulnerable areas. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-MC-6.3 |
To ensure that the existing handling and storage of non-agricultural source material ceases to be a significant drinking water threat where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as applicable, shall review and, if necessary, amend a Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or an Environmental Compliance Approval, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure that such NASM Plans/Environmental Compliance Approvals incorporate any measures and/or terms and conditions deemed necessary to reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-NB-1.16 |
To ensure that spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area along highways, railway lines or shipping lanes,
a. The Municipality of Bayham and Township of Malahide are requested to incorporate the location of WHPAs into their emergency response plans in order to protect drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways, rail lines or shipping lanes.
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-NB-1.17 |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the Municipality is requested to support ongoing programs which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903 where such activities could be a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-NB-1.7 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support for incentive programs to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program and the Rural Water Quality Program. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-NB-1.8 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from the following existing and future activities, where such activities are or would be significant drinking water threats,
the Long Point Region Conservation Authority, in consultation with the Municipality, will deliver available cost share incentive programs, as long as the
Long Point Region Conservation Authority has such programs and outreach staff available, and work with affected land owners to implement best management
practices for the following activities:
i. The application of agricultural source material to land;
ii. The storage of agricultural source material; and,
iii. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EC-NB-18.1 |
To ensure that the operation and establishment of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of Ontario Regulation 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or is subject to the National Energy Board Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the pipeline proponent, the National Energy Board and the Ontario Energy Board are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the Municipality the location of any new proposed pipeline within the Municipality and/or Source Protection Area.
The Source Protection Authority should document in the annual report the number of new pipelines proposed within vulnerable areas if a pipeline has been proposed and/or application has been received. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
EC-NB/CW-1.6 |
The Conservation Authority, and/or Municipality, in collaboration with other implementing bodies and levels of government wherever possible, may develop
and implement incentive programs directed at various significant threat activities where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the
Conservation Authority and/or Municipality, subject to available funding. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EDU-1 |
The local SPA, in collaboration with municipalities, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the MOE where possible to target those, applying, handling or storing:
3/4) agricultural source material
6/7) non-agricultural source material
8/9) commercial fertilizer
10/11) pesticides; and
21) those using the land for livestock grazing, pasturing, outdoor confinement or farm-animal yard within vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. The program will promote best management practices to safeguard water supplies from various agricultural related drinking water threats and include a component on timely fertilizer application practices. The program will be carried out in consultation with the Ontario Soil and Crop Improvement Association and others, where appropriate. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-1-LB |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, the municipality shall initiate an education and outreach program targeted at residents and businesses located in the Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10 and the Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher. Source Protection Authorities will help develop materials that will raise awareness about these vulnerable areas and foster good stewardship practices within them. Municipalities will then use any means that effectively disseminates this information to residents and businesses in these areas such as a mail-out, participation in community events and partnering with other agencies to make use of existing programs. Once established, this education program shall be ongoing with materials being disseminated periodically as deemed appropriate by the municipality. The program may address any water quality or quantity topic but must include promotion of the following:
Awareness of the vulnerable areas (will be marked by road and waterway signs)
Best management practices for waste that is regulated by the MOE through means other than Prescribed Instruments
Proper septic system care and maintenance
Awareness of the Mandatory On-Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspection Program
Best management practices for storing and applying nutrients and for outdoor livestock areas
Risk management measures for fuel storage
Awareness of Ontario's Cosmetic Pesticide Ban and best management practices where pesticides are used under an exemption from the ban
The importance of complying with all aspects of the Pesticide training/certification and Integrated Pest Management Programs
Participation in the Environmental Farm Plan Program
Awareness of DNAPL and organic solvent substances and the products that may contain them, alternative products that do not pose a threat to drinking water and proper disposal of unwanted products
""Smart salt practices ; for the use of road salt
The importance of addressing existing transport pathways such as abandoned wells and ensuring new projects, such as geothermal installations, do not create new transport pathways
Existing funding programs available to help property owners and businesses implement best management practices and Source Protection Plan policy requirements |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EDU-10 |
The MOE shall petition Health Canada to include products containing DNAPLs (TCE, PAHs and vinyl chloride, 1, 4 Dioxane and PCE) and organic solvents (chloroform, carbon tetrachloride, pentachlorophenol, methylene chloride) as controlled products, requiring cautionary labelling about the dangers these products pose to sources of drinking water. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-11 |
In accordance with Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with source protection authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate provincial standards, to identify the locations of wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along provincial highways within the wellhead protection areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or within an intake protection zone or wellhead protection area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
Municipalities will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the province in collaboration with the SPAs. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within a wellhead protection areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or an intake protection zone or wellhead protection area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
The above policies will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan within each Source Protection Area. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-12 |
The MOE is encouraged to develop education materials to aid in the implementation of education and outreach programs to address the following significant drinking water threats:
1b) waste disposal sites
2a) stormwater management facilities
2c) on-site sewage systems
3) application of agricultural source material to land
4) storage of agricultural source material
6) application of non-agricultural source material to land
7) handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
8) application of commercial fertilizer to land
9) handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
10) application of pesticides to land
11) handling and storage of pesticides
12) application of road salt
13) handling and storage of road salt
14) storage of snow
15) handling and storage of fuel
16) handling and storage of DNAPLs
17) handling and storage of organic solvents
20) an activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer
21) use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-2 |
The local SPA, in collaboration with municipalities, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the MOE where possible to target those, handling or storing:
15 ) fuel
16) dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs); and
17) organic solvents
within vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. The program will promote pollution prevention by explaining the importance of proper storage and disposal of hazardous waste, and will promote the use of alternatives to DNAPLs. The program will also focus on providing homeowners and fuel suppliers with information on the proper handling and storage of fuel from a source water protection perspective. The program will be carried out in consultation with the municipality responsible for waste and TSSA, where appropriate. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-2-NLB |
The Ontario Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the MOE as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities, is strongly encouraged to design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within the Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and within the Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher. This policy should be implemented within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EDU-3 |
The local SPA, in collaboration with municipalities, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the MOE where possible to target municipalities, property managers, and the salt application industry, applying, handling and storing:
- road salt and snow within vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. The program will promote pollution prevention by explaining the importance of proper salt application, storage and run-off management of salt and snow to safeguard water supplies. The program will be carried out in consultation with AMO and OGRA. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-3-NLB |
The municipality is strongly encouraged to purchase, install and maintain signs designed by the Ministry of Transportation in collaboration with the Source Protection Authorities to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within a Wellhead Protection Area with a vulnerability score of 10 and/or an Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher (appropriate sign locations will ultimately be determined based on site-specific factors such as the size of the area scored 10). This policy should be initiated within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EDU-4 |
The MOE shall be encouraged to maintain and enhance education and outreach programs focusing on water conservation in areas where taking water from an aquifer without returning the water to the same aquifer would be a significant drinking water threat.
Note: This policy applies to the following local areas-York (Bradford, Durham), Midland, Penetanguishene, Whip-Poor-Will, Orangeville (Mono, Amaranth). |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-4-NLB |
The municipality is strongly encouraged to purchase, install and maintain signs designed by the Ministry of Transportation to identify the locations of Intake Protection Zones. These signs should be placed along recreational waterways where awareness of the Intake Protection Zones should be raised. Source Protection Authorities will collaborate with municipalities, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Parks Canada to determine appropriate sign locations and secure any necessary approvals for the installation. This policy should be initiated within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EDU-5 |
The local SPA, in collaboration with municipalities, is encouraged to undertake an education and outreach program that focuses on the importance of maintaining groundwater recharge within areas where the reduction of recharge is a significant drinking water threat.
Note: This policy only applies to the Orangeville Local Area (Mono, Amaranth). |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-5-NLB |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, the municipality is strongly encouraged to initiate an education and outreach program targeted at local fuel distributors, sewage haulers, lawn care companies and other businesses that transport potential drinking water contaminants in Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher. The Source Protection Authority will assist with the identification of potential businesses and the development of educational materials. To the extent feasible, this initiative should use existing training opportunities offered within these sectors to promote:
Awareness of vulnerable areas (will be marked by road and waterway signs)
Spill prevention (emphasizing the importance of adhering to existing spill prevention guidelines when operating in vulnerable drinking water areas)
Spill response (emphasizing the importance of adhering to or learning procedures to follow in the event of a spill in a vulnerable drinking water area) |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EDU-6 |
The local SPA, in collaboration with municipalities, shall undertake an education and outreach program targeting those establishing, operating or maintaining:
- A system that collects, stores or transmits, treats or disposes of sewage (Threat # 2a and 2c)
within vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. The program will promote the importance of source water protection, the proper disposal of hazardous waste and proper care and maintenance of septic systems. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-6-NLB |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, the Source Protection Authority is strongly encouraged to develop materials about the highly vulnerable nature of the Mississippi-Rideau region's aquifers and actions that would help protect them. The materials should be accessible by all residents in the region, and should be disseminated when possible by the Source Protection Authority, municipalities, health units and other interested groups and agencies. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
EDU-7 |
The local SPA, in collaboration with municipalities, shall undertake an education and outreach program, and use materials developed by the MOE where possible, targeting those establishing, operating or maintaining a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act (Threat # 1b) within vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. The program will promote the importance of source water protection, with a particular focus on the proper handling, storage and disposal of wastes described in clauses p, q, r, s, t, u of the definition of hazardous waste O.Reg 347). |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-8 |
The City of Barrie shall undertake an education and outreach program targeting those who apply and handle road salt or store road salt and snow within the Barrie issues contributing area. The program will promote the importance of proper snow storage and salt application, handling and storage. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
EDU-9 |
The Ministry of Environment should undertake community-based social marketing research, in consultation with local source protection authorities. The research should be targeted at fostering behaviour aimed at protecting drinking water by understanding the barriers to behaviour. The results of this research would be shared with source protection authorities to implement education and outreach activities at a local level within vulnerable areas where significant drinking water threats are or would be present. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
ERSPA-microcystinLR-1 |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority will initiate and
lead Education and Outreach by building on existing
Education and Outreach programs to promote best
management practices targeted at phosphorus reduction
from a variety of sources. The entire Essex Region Source
Protection Area will be included in the E&O program.
Targeted programs may include:
Education and outreach programs on the importance of
commercial fertilizer-free buffers around wells and surface
water, targeted at commercial fertilizer application
technicians and/or homeowners.
Promoting voluntary nutrient management plans for farms
that do not qualify under O. Reg. 267/03 and who land
apply commercial fertilizers.
Promoting and encouraging use of a nutrient calculator to
determine the proper amount of nutrients to be applied in
each situation and for each crop.
Promoting BMPs for the application, storage and handling of
commercial fertilizer in areas where it is or would be a
significant drinking water threat.
Implementation will be conditional on availability of funding.
The E & O will be targeted for full implementation within two
years after the Plan takes effect, and will continue as needed
based on reviews. The above applies to drinking water
threats that may release phosphorus, which contributes to
algal growth and the production of microcystins-LR:
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste
disposal site;
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system
that collects, stores,
transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
The application of agricultural source material to land;
The storage of agricultural source material;
The management of agricultural source material;
The application of non-agricultural source material to land;
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source
material;
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an
outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard
|
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
F-1 |
Applicable Activities: Storage of fuel that would be a future significant drinking water threat.
F-1: The activity is prohibited and designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 unless the fuel is stored for use in a back-up generator that is intended for use during a municipal emergency.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
F-2 |
Applicable Activities: Storage of fuel that is an existing significant drinking water threat.
F-2(1): The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Risk Management Plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8.
F-2(2): The risk management plan required by (1) must, at a minimum, specify the requirement to have the fuel tank inspected by a TSSA-certified technician at a frequency of no less than every 5 years or at discretion of the Risk Management Official. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
F1E-RMP |
The existing handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act requiring Risk Management Plans in the vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant threat.
The risk management plan must at a minimum meet the standards set forth in the Technical Standards and Safety Act, 2000 and related regulations (O. Reg. 213/01 [Fuel Oil] and O. Reg. 217/01 [Liquid Fuels]) as amended from time to time, including the Code of Adoption document and associated Director's Orders. It must also require reporting any spills of fuel that enter or are likely to enter waters to the MOE Spills Action Centre. Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
All land uses in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of fuel is a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
F2EF-PI |
Where the handling and storage of fuel (existing and future) could be a significant threat the approving director under Part V of the Safe Drinking Water Act shall require the drinking water system owner to manage the fuel threat so that it ceases to be or does not become a significant threat. This may include, but is not limited to, the following alterations of the works and operating procedures:
Secondary containment;
Spill/leak detection and spill response procedures as per Condition 16 of the license;
Collision protection; and
Protection of oil lines from physical damage.
The director shall require the owner to amend their Drinking Water Works Permit / Municipal Drinking Water License to include the required alterations/operations procedures and apply to the Ministry within 90 ninety days of receiving the Director's notification. The MOE review of the license shall ensure that the spills response procedures prepared by the owner as per item b above include the required reporting to the MOE Spills Action Centre.
Monitoring policy M1 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
F3F-s57 |
The future handling and storage of fuel is prohibited and therefore designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act where the activity would be a significant threat.
This policy does not apply to those future facilities that would be regulated under a Municipal Drinking Water License (e.g. fuel storage for back-up power generators at municipal drinking water intake pump houses).
All land uses in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the future handling and storage of fuel would be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
F4EF-PI |
Where the handling and storage of fuel (existing and future) could be a moderate or low threat, the approving director under Part V of the Safe Drinking Water Act should require the drinking water system owner to manage the fuel threat so that it does not become a significant threat. This may include, but is not limited to, the following alterations of the works and operating procedures:
Secondary containment;
Spill/leak detection and spill response procedures as per Condition 16 of the license;
Collision protection; and
Protection of oil lines from physical damage.
The director should require the owner to amend their Drinking Water Works Permit / Municipal Drinking Water License to include the required alterations/operations procedures and apply to the Ministry within 90 ninety days of receiving the Director's notification. The MOE review of the license should ensure that the spills response procedures prepared by the owner as per item b above include the required reporting to the MOE Spills Action Centre.
Monitoring policy M17 applies. |
Nickel District |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
FER-1 |
1) The application of commercial fertilizer (containing nitrogen) to land shall be prohibited where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (future).
2) Where the application of commercial fertilizer (containing nitrogen or phosphorus) to land is in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-2: Prescribed Instruments (existing), where prohibited, shall not be renewed when the current Prescribed Instrument expires, and the significant threat activity to which the Prescribed Instrument pertains, shall cease no later than 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FER-2 |
For lands that do not require a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy, where the application of commercial fertilizer to land is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat (excluding incidental quantities for personal use), the following actions shall be taken:
1) The application of commercial fertilizer (containing nitrogen) is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (future).
2) The application of commercial fertilizer (containing nitrogen or phosphorus) to land is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-4: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act as prohibited, shall be prohibited by the Risk Management Official within 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect as per s. 57(2) under the Clean Water Act, unless otherwise specified within the policy.
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FER-3 |
For farms and other lands, where the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer to land is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat (excluding incidental quantities for personal use), the following actions shall be taken:
1) The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in the following area:
WHPA-A (future).
2) The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer to land is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future).
Without limiting other requirements, risk management plans shall include conditions to require storage of quantities over 2,500 kg to be within a covered structure
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FER-4 |
The municipality shall deliver education and outreach materials and programs where the application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, targeted towards:
a) an individual for personal use to promote timely fertilizer application and best management practices in urban settings; and
b) owners/tenants of non-agriculturally zoned lands to promote best management practices to safeguard water supplies from drinking water threats; in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9 for application; VS = 10 for handling and storage) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future).
Where education and outreach materials prepared by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks are available, the municipality shall deliver those materials.
Timeline:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
FERT(App)-1 |
Existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan for those not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan will include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the application of commercial fertilizer ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan shall require fertilizers to be applied using best agronomic practices on the advice of a certified crop advisor, that soil tests (NPK) be carried out and that proper farm practices regarding crop rotation be applied, as appropriate. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
FERT(App)-2 |
Where the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land is in an area where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, and the activity requires an approval under the Nutrient Management Act, OMAFRA shall ensure that the nutrient management plan or strategy that governs the application of commercial fertilizer to land includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
FERT(H&S)-1 |
The existing handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan for those not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards and shall require:
1) liquid fertilizer to be stored in double-walled tanks or secondary containment facilities, with collision protection,
2) dry fertilizer to be stored undercover on impervious floor surfaces with no drainage outlets so that the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
FERT(H&S)-2 |
Future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
FERT(ICA)-1 |
The existing and future application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer to land is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan for those not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, where the vulnerability score is less than 10. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards and shall require:
Application
1) all fertilizers to be applied using best agronomic practices based on the advice of a certified crop advisor;
2) that soil tests (NPK) be conducted; and
3) that proper farm practices regarding crop rotation be applied, as appropriate.
Handling and Storage
1) liquid fertilizer to be stored in double-walled tanks or secondary containment facilities, with collision protection;
2) dry fertilizer to be stored under cover on impervious floor surfaces with no drainage outlets
so that the application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
FERT(ICA)-2 |
Where the Nutrient Management Act does not require an approval, the existing and future handling, storage and application of commercial fertilizer is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the vulnerability score is 10, and the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
FERT(ICA)-3 |
Where the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land is in an area where the vulnerability score is less than 10 and the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, and requires approval under the Nutrient Management Act, OMAFRA shall ensure that the nutrient management plan or strategy that governs the application of commercial fertilizer include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be or become a significant drinking water threat. Such conditions may include:
1) requiring all fertilizers to be applied using best agronomic practices based on the advice of a certified crop advisor;
2) that soil tests (NPK) be conducted;
3) that proper farm practices regarding crop rotation be applied, as appropriate. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
FERT(ICA)-4 |
The existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land is prohibited where the vulnerability score is 10 and the activities would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
FERT-1-LB-PI-MC |
Where the application of commercial fertilizer (existing and/or future) that is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B is governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Nutrient Management Plan developed under General Regulation 267/03 of the Nutrient Management Act), this activity shall continue to be managed through these existing requirements. The existing regulatory requirements administered by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and the corresponding compliance program enforced by the MOE already manage this activity so that it is not a significant threat to drinking water. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FERT-2-LB-S58 |
The following activities related to commercial fertilizer are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is or would be significant as described in Appendix B:
Existing handling and storage for retail sale
Existing and future non-residential handling and storage in relation to application
Existing and future non-residential application
The Risk Management Plan should demonstrate and ensure compliance with Canadian Fertilizer Institute guidelines and codes of practice where appropriate. The Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. This policy does not apply to:
Activities governed by Nutrient Management Plans developed under the Nutrient Management Act. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FERT-3-LB-S57 |
The future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer for retail sale is designated as prohibited under Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where the threat would be significant as described in Appendix B. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-1-CTC |
Where the handling and storage of fuel at a municipal wellhead is in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, drinking water licences under the Safe Drinking Water Act shall be reviewed to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-1-LB-S58 |
The existing or future handling and storage of fuel at a facility as defined in Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 213/01 except for the handling and storage of fuel regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is or would be significant as described in Appendix B. Risk Management Plans shall have the following minimum content (except where alternate measures are determined to be as protective of drinking water sources):
Single-walled steel tanks with side feed must be replaced at 10 years old
Single-walled steel tanks with bottom-feed must be replaced at 15 years old
Double-bottom steel tanks with bottom-feed must be replaced at 25 years old (or earlier if a leak detection device indicates a leak)
Replacement tanks must not be side feed and must be more leak resistant than single-walled steel (e.g., fiberglass or double-bottomed steel for indoor; double-walled with leak detection for outdoor)
Replacement or new tanks must be outfitted with a tank tray to capture fuel in the event of an overfill or small leak
Oil lines must be installed and maintained in a manner that protects them from physical damage
Annual inspections must be carried out by a certified Oil Burner Technician (or equally qualified person) as required under Section 13 of the Ontario Installation Code for Oil-Burning Equipment
Prompt repairs or upgrades must be made to address deficiencies noted in the annual inspection
Property owners are advised to hold pollution liability insurance
Procedures to follow in the event of a spill
Unused fuel oil tanks must be decommissioned in accordance with Section 6.16 of the Ontario Installation Code for Oil-burning Equipment
The Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-1-RRSN |
The future and existing handling and storage of fuel as defined under Ontario Regulation 213/01 except for the handling and storage of fuel regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002 is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (Risk Management Plan) where this activity is a significant drinking water threat.
The Risk Management Plan shall include the following risk management measures:
DESIGN & OPERATION STANDARDS
Single-walled steel tanks with side-feed must be replaced immediately
The replacement of single-walled steel tanks with bottom-feed when the tank is 15 years old (or earlier if a leak detection device indicates a leak)
The replacement of double-bottom steel tanks with bottom-feed when the tank is 25 years old (or earlier if a leak detection device indicates a leak)
The installation of oil lines in a manner that protects them from physical damage
In all cases, new installations of fuel tanks shall meet the most up-to-date standards/technologies available (ex. more leak resistant than a single walled tank)
Decommissioning of unused fuel oil tanks in accordance with Section 6.16 of the Ontario Installation Code for Oil-Burning Equipment.
TRAINING
Information on procedures to be followed in the event of a spill for businesses and home owners
Education related to basic filling precautions and procedures for spills during handling (from the Ontario Installation Code for Oil-Burning Equipment)
If yearly inspections are required under Section 13 of the Ontario Installation Code for Oil-Burning Equipment the Risk Management Official/Inspector shall request evidence to show that yearly inspections are being done by a certified Oil Burner Technician.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1, GENERAL-5, and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-1-SGBLS |
With the exception of personal domestic use, the existing handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan will include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the handling and storage of fuel ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, and at a minimum, complies with contemporary standards. The risk management plan may include such conditions as:
1) secondary containment
2) spill/leak detection (monitoring processes)
3) collision protection (bollards) |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
FUEL-2-CTC |
1) The handling and storage of fuel at an aggregate extraction site shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future).
2) Where the handling and storage of fuel at an aggregate extraction site is in an area where the activity is a significant drinking water threat, the license, site plan or permit that governs the activity shall be reviewed to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing).
Timelines:
T-1:Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-2-LB-PI-MC |
Where the handling and storage of fuel associated with the drinking water system (existing and/or future) is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the MOE shall ensure that the Prescribed Instrument that governs the system (approvals issued under the Safe Drinking Water Act) includes appropriate terms and conditions so that:
a) The handling and storage of fuel (existing) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; or
b) The handling and storage of fuel (future) never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The MOE should consider including in the terms and conditions the risk management measures listed in policy FUEL-1-LB-S58. The MOE shall comply with part (a) of this policy within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-2-RRSN |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (Risk Management Plan) where they are or could be a significant drinking water threat:
the existing and future handling and storage of liquid fuels (under O. Reg. 217/01) at private outlets and farms; and
the existing handling and storage of liquid fuels (under O. Reg. 217/01) at facilities other than private outlets and farms.
The Risk Management Plan shall include the following content:
New installations for private outlets and farms must be above ground if possible and installed in accordance with O. Reg. 217/01 and the Liquid Fuels Handling Code
Tanks and piping must be tested and monitored in accordance with Section 7 of the Liquid Fuels Handling Code
Dispensing operations must be in compliance with Section 6 of the Liquid Fuels Handling Code
Detailed procedures to be followed in event of a spill
Unused tanks must be decommissioned in accordance with the Liquid Fuels Handling Code
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1, GENERAL-5 and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-2-SGBLS |
Future handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
FUEL-3-CTC |
Where the handling and storage of liquid fuel and fuel oil at non-residential properties, multi-unit residential properties or small businesses (in quantities = 2500 litres above or below grade) is in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future).
2) The handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing).
Without limiting other requirements, risk management plans shall incorporate appropriate provisions of Ontario Regulations 213/01 and 217/01 and their codes, best management practices and standards as amended from time to time to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
3) The Source Protection Authority shall:
a) request inspection reports from the Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) on Private Fuel Outlets (PFOs) in areas where the handling and storage of fuel is a significant threat as requested by the SPA; and
b) provide this information to the Risk Management Official to aid in prioritizing the development of the risk management plans for those that pose the greatest risk first; and
c) provide to TSSA any data about leaks and other concerns observed, as they relate to TSSA's mandate to enforce O. Reg. 213/217 (as amended) and their corresponding codes, at PFOs from RMOs or through SPA staff work that would support TSSA's enforcement of regulatory requirements for PFOs.
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-14: The policy shall be complied with within 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-3-NLB |
Where the handling and storage of fuel at a facility as defined in Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 213/01 is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the Ministry of Consumer Services and the Ministry of the Environment are strongly encouraged to consider source water protection during the next scheduled code review.
In addition, the TSSA is strongly encouraged to continue to include information regarding new code requirements and leak resistant technology in its communications products and request fuel suppliers to:
Promote to their customers the importance of regular maintenance as described in Section 13 of the Ontario Installation Code for Oil-burning Equipment to increase awareness of and compliance with this requirement (this could be accomplished by printing a reminder on the fuel bill)
Implementing bodies should see Section 5 for corresponding monitoring policies which could contain reporting requirements. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-3-RRSN |
Where fuel handling and storage at a municipal drinking water system facility is identified as a significant drinking water threat regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002 (SDWA), the approving director under Part V of the SDWA will require the owner to assess if the storage of fuel in any part of the drinking water system is a significant threat. In order to address any significant threats, alteration of the works/operating procedures shall include:
Secondary containment;
Spill/leak detection and spill response procedures as per Condition 16 of the license;
Collision protection;
Protection of oil lines from physical damage.
The Director will require the owner to apply to the Ministry within 90 days of receiving the Ministry's concurrence with the assessment, to amend the Drinking Water Works Permit/License to include the required alterations/operating procedures.
Instruments that exist before the day the plan takes effect must be reviewed and, if necessary, amended within three years.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-3-SGBLS |
The local Source Protection Authority shall request from the Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) inspection reports on Private Fuel Outlets in areas where the handling and storage of fuel is a significant drinking water threat. To aid in the implementation of Part IV policies, the TSSA will provide this information to the Source Protection Authority for distribution to Risk Management Officials. The local source protection authority will report back to TSSA any data about leaks and other concerns observed, as they relate to TSSA's mandate to enforce Ore 213/217 (as amended). |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
FUEL-4-CTC |
The municipality shall prepare and deliver education and outreach materials and programs to residences and small businesses where the handling and storage of liquid fuel and fuel oil is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat to advise the owner/tenant about the actions to take to ensure that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat. Where appropriate education and outreach materials prepared by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, the Technical Standards and Safety Authority or other parties are available, the municipality shall deliver those materials in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future).
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall collaborate with the Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) and the Ministry of Government and Consumer Services to:
a) provide education and outreach materials for delivery by local municipalities to residences and small businesses about how to prevent spills or leaks from contaminating water and what to do if a spill happens or is suspected;
b) include source water safety information into current public education vehicles, such as TSSA's website and seasonal brochures;
c) work with fuel industry associations to facilitate distribution of educational materials to fuel suppliers; and
d) provide colleges with source water awareness information that can be integrated into fuel technician training programs.
Timeline:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-4-NLB |
Where the handling and storage of fuel at an existing bulk plant, cardlock/keylock or retail outlet including a marina (licensed facilities) as defined in Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 217/01 is a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, this activity shall continue to be managed through existing regulatory requirements. The existing requirements under Ontario Regulation 217/01 and the Liquid Fuels Handling Code administered by the TSSA already manage this activity so that it is not a significant threat to drinking water. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-4-RRSN |
The future handling and storage of liquid fuel as defined in the Technical Standards and Safety Act, 2000, O. Reg. 217/01 (as amended) at facilities other than private outlets and farms is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (prohibition) where it would be significant drinking water threat.
This prohibition takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1 and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-4-SGBLS |
Municipalities shall develop a by-law to require the removal of fuel tanks from abandoned properties within 1 year of known abandonment, and unused tanks from occupied properties once no longer in use within vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of fuel is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
FUEL-5-LB-S57 |
The future handling and storage of fuel at a bulk plant, cardlock/keylock or retail outlet, including a marina (licensed facilities) as defined in section 1 of O. Regulation 217/01 or at a facility that manufactures or refines fuel is designated as prohibited under Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where the threat would be significant as described in Appendix B. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUEL-6-LB-S58 |
The existing or future handling and storage of fuel at a private outlet as defined in Section 1 of Ontario Regulation 217/01 is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is or would be significant as described in Appendix B. Risk Management Plans shall have the following minimum content:
New installations must be above ground if feasible and installed in accordance with Ontario Regulation 217/01 and the Liquid Fuels Handling Code
Tanks and piping systems must be tested and monitored in accordance with Section 7 of the Liquid Fuels Handling Code
Dispensing operations must be in compliance with Section 6 of the Liquid Fuels Handling Code
Owner/operator is advised to hold pollution liability insurance
Procedures to follow in the event of a spill
Decommissioning of unused fuel tanks must be in accordance with the Liquid Fuels Handling Code
The Risk Management Plans for existing handling and storage of fuel at private outlets shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUL1 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Municipality shall prohibit the use of land for a gas bar, marina, automobile service station, cardlock/keylock facility, private outlet, farm, refinery, bulk plant and any commercial or industrial land use involving the handling and storage of
fuel other than for heating at the location where the threat would be significant. A Municipality's official plan and zoning by-law in effect for the vulnerable areas shall be reviewed and amended, as necessary, as required under Section 26 of the Planning Act to conform to this prohibition.
This policy shall apply in the following vulnerable areas:
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
FUL2 |
A prescribed instrument that is of a type listed below, issued where the threat from the handling and storage of fuel could be significant, shall contain conditions to manage the threat. A review of existing instruments and their conditions to manage these threats shall be completed within three years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or by a time determined by a Director as defined in the associated Act or Regulation, based on a prioritized review of prescribed instruments that govern the handling and storage of fuel in association with the named instruments.
This policy shall apply in the following vulnerable areas:
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1.
The prescribed instruments for this policy include:
1. Aggregate Resources Act: Section 8 site plans included in applications for licenses.
2. Aggregate Resources Act: Sections 11 and 13 licenses to remove aggregate from pits or quarries.
3. Aggregate Resources Act: Section 25 site plans accompanying applications for wayside permits.
4. Aggregate Resources Act: Section 30 wayside permits to operate pits or quarries.
5. Aggregate Resources Act: Section 36 site plans included in applications for aggregate permits.
6. Aggregate Resources Act: Section 34 aggregate permits to excavate aggregate or topsoil.
7. Environmental Protection Act: Section 39 for the use, operation,establishment, alteration, enlargement or extension of a waste disposal site.
8. Safe Drinking Water Act: Section 40 with respect to drinking water works permits issued by the Director.
9. Safe Drinking Water Act: Section 44 with respect to the municipal drinking water licences issued by the Director. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
FUL3 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Technical Standards & Safety Authority should continue to maintain information on its website related to safe handling and storage of fuels, to support the education and outreach required by Policy FUL4 in Mattawa WHPA-A & B, and Powassan WHPA-A & B1. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
FUL4 |
Where there could be a significant threat from the handling of liquid fuels and fuel oil in a quantity exceeding 2500 L, the storage
of liquid fuel in tanks of 250 L or greater that are located partially, or completely below grade, and tanks greater than 2500 L for any facility located
above grade, the Municipality, in association with appropriate partners, shall plan and deliver an education and outreach program within one year of the date
the Source Protection Plan takes effect. The program shall be designed to ensure those involved in the handling and storage of fuel, including but not limited to the
owner/operator of the facility, are aware of the risks posed to source water, how to reduce those risks, and how to recognize and respond to a spill.
The program shall be made available and updated as necessary on an ongoing basis as is deemed appropriate by the Municipality.
Further, the program may be delivered more broadly at the discretion of a municipal council.
The policy shall apply in the following vulnerable areas:
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-01 |
Restricted Land Use – Non-residential
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity):
1. The Establishment, Operation or Maintenance of a Waste Disposal Site Within the Meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act
2. The application of agricultural source material to land;
3. The storage of agricultural source material;
4. The application of non-agricultural source material to land;
5. The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material;
6. The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
7. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
8. The application of pesticide to land;
9. The handling and storage of pesticide;
10. The application of road salt;
11. The handling and storage of road salt;
12. The storage of snow;
13. The handling and storage of fuel;
14. The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL);
15. The handling and storage of an organic solvent;
16. The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft;
17. An activity that takes water from an aquifer or surface water body without returning the water taken to the same aquifer or surface water body;
18. An activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer;
19. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
All non-residential land uses are designated as restricted land uses for the purpose of s. 59 of the Clean Water Act.
For clarity, the activities identified above are those which are the subject of other source protection plan policies that utilize prohibition under s. 57 of the Clean Water Act or utilize Risk Management Plans under s. 58 of the Clean Water Act.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is or is not designated for the purposes of section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as applicable, is satisfied that:
a. The application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and
b. The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
The policy takes effect on the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-02 |
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity):
1. The handling and storage of fuel;
2. The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL);
3. The handling and storage of an organic solvent
4. An activity that takes water from an aquifer or surface water body without returning the water taken to the same aquifer or surface water body;
5. An activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer.
All residential land uses are designated as restricted land uses for the purpose of s. 59 of the Clean Water Act.
For clarity, the activities identified above are those which are the subject of other source protection plan policies that utilize prohibition under s. 57 of the Clean Water Act or utilize Risk Management Plans under s. 58 of the Clean Water Act.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is not designated for the purposes of section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as applicable, is satisfied that:
a. The application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and
b. The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
The policy takes effect on the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-03 |
The policy applies to the following activities in all Events-based Areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity):
1. The handling and storage of fuel.
All non-residential land uses are designated as restricted land uses for the purpose of s. 59 of the Clean Water Act.
For clarity, the activities identified above are those which are the subject of other source protection plan policies that utilize prohibition under s. 57 of the Clean Water Act or utilize Risk Management Plans under s. 58 of the Clean Water Act.
This policy takes effect on the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-04 |
The municipality shall amend its official plan and zoning by-law to include:
1. mapping that identifies vulnerable areas where activities would be significant threats (future activities); and
2. text that identifies that policies within the Source Protection Plan may apply to activities in these mapped areas.
This policy applies to all land use designations and zones described in the municipality’s official plan and zoning by-law, as amended from time to time.
The Municipality shall:
A. Adopt the official plan, or official plan amendment as the case may be, and:
i. submit the plan to the appropriate approval authority; or
ii. give a notice of adoption; and
B. Adopt the zoning by-law, or zoning by-law amendment as the case may be, and
give a notice of adoption.
For Section 40(2) of the Clean Water Act, the official plan and zoning by-law must be amended within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan or at
the time of the next official plan and zoning by-law conformity exercise as per Section 26 of the Planning Act.
Monitoring policy MP-21 applies
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-05 |
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity):
1. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects,
stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
2. The application of agricultural source material to land;
3. The storage of agricultural source material;
4. The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
5. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
6. The application of pesticide to land ;
7. The handling and storage of pesticide;
8. The handling and storage of fuel;
9. The handling and storage of an organic solvent;
10. An activity that takes water from an aquifer or surface water body without
returning the water taken to the same aquifer or surface water body;
11. An activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer;
12. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor
confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and/or the Ministry of
Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs should make available an incentive program. The
program should require an application that is subject to a technical review and
approval process.
Eligible projects in the grant program generally may include, but not necessarily be limited to:
- consulting fees;
- plan preparation costs related to risk management plans, nutrient management
plans or nutrient management strategies;
- training courses related to the preparation of plans where the applicant intends
to prepare the plan themselves;
- implementation of best management practices
Other eligible projects in the grant program may include, but not necessarily be
limited to:
A. For the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects,
stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage:
- connection to the municipal sewer line and decommissioning of an on-site
sewage system;
- connection to a communal system and decommissioning of an on-site sewage
system;
- installation of an advanced on-site sewage treatment system;
- repairs and upgrades
Note: Any unused components of the previous on-site sewage system should
be properly decommissioned. Systems that are subject to an order by a
principal authority should not be eligible.
B. For the application of agricultural source material, pesticide or commercial
fertilizer:
- spreading equipment improvements;
- calibration equipment;
- GPS technology
C. For the storage of pesticide or commercial fertilizer:
- storage improvements;
- handling equipment improvements
D. For the storage of agricultural source material:
- runoff management;
- relocation of manure storage facilities;
- improvements to manure storage facilities
E. For the storage of fuel:
- storage and handling equipment improvements;
- secondary containment measures;
- strike prevention barriers;
- spill prevention measures;
- spills plans;
- exclusion of remediation costs
F. For the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor
confinement area or a farm-animal yard:
- fencing or other measures to restrict access to watercourses;
- alternative watering systems;
- runoff management;
- relocation of outdoor confinement areas or farm-animal yards;
- improvements to outdoor confinement areas or farm-animal yards
The following costs related to projects may also be considered as eligible expenses:
- permit and approval fees;
- applicable taxes
The program should be established within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-06 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-06 |
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity):
1. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act;
2. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores,
transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
3. The application of agricultural source material to land;
4. The storage of agricultural source material;
5. The application of non-agricultural source material to land;
6. The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material;
7. The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
8. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
9. The application of pesticide to land;
10. The handling and storage of pesticide;
11. The application of road salt;
12. The handling and storage of road salt;
13. The storage of snow;
14. The handling and storage of fuel;
15. The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL);
16. The handling and storage of an organic solvent;
17. The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of
aircraft;
18. An activity that takes water from an aquifer or surface water body without
returning the water taken to the same aquifer or surface water body;
19. An activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer;
20. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement
area or a farm-animal yard.
Conservation Authorities shall provide an education program that offers information and materials to landowners. Furthermore, Conservation Authorities are encouraged
to work in partnership with other agencies to implement this policy.
Topics of a general nature in the program may include, but are not limited to:
- Prohibition of certain activities;
- Requirements for a Risk Management Plan for certain activities;
- Constraints on prescribed instruments (provincial approvals) for certain
activities;
- Local zoning by-law provisions and municipal by-laws;
- Proper disposal methods;
- Occurrence of hazardous waste disposal opportunities;
- Funding opportunities;
- Advice and assistance available from provincial Ministries, non-governmental
organizations and other agencies;
- Various types of facilities or equipment for application, handling or storage
activities;
- Best management practices for application, handling or storage activities.
Other topics in the program related to particular activities may include, but are not
necessarily limited to:
A. For waste disposal sites:
- risks associated with use and disposal of hazardous products;
- alternative or environmentally-friendly products;
- a ‘take back’ concept whereby retailers and manufacturers would offer to
collect materials that they have sold or manufactured.
B. For on-site sewage systems and sewers:
- risks associated with disposal of hazardous products into sewers;
- the location of storm sewers and the negative impacts of disposing of
materials down the sewer;
- alternative or environmentally-friendly products.
C. For the application of agricultural source material to land or the storage of
agricultural source material:
- the emerging science of vaccinations for ruminants against the shedding of
Escherichia coli O157:H7 as a further best management practice.
D. For the application of pesticides:
- the requirement for permits and licenses
E. For the storage of fuel:
- risks associated with use of these products;
- fostering of fuel companies’ efforts to promote best management practices
within the industry;
- education of associated industries, such as the insurance sector, to promote
best management practices within the industry and reflect these in their
premiums.
F. For the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) or
an organic solvent:
- risks associated with use of these products;
- products that may contain these chemicals;
- alternative or environmentally-friendly products;
- municipal sewer use by-laws prohibiting the discharge of products containing
dense non-aqueous phase liquids or organic solvents;
- education of businesses about the importance of proper hazardous waste
disposal;
- fostering of chemical manufacturing associations’ efforts to promote best
management practices within the industry;
- education of associated industries, such as the insurance sector, to promote
best management practices within the industry and reflect these in their
premiums.
The program shall be established within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-27 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-07 |
The policy applies in all vulnerable areas where activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity).
In accordance with Section 22 (7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation should:
1. in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities, design a sign to the
appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and lntake Protection Zones; and
2. manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within the Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, an lntake Protection
Zone or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher and/or an events-based area.
Municipalities and counties shall be responsible for:
1. purchasing, installing and maintaining appropriate signs designed by the
Province in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment and Climate
Change as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities; and
2. placing these signs, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads or county
roads are located within a Wellhead Protection Area with a vulnerability score of
10, an lntake Protection Zone or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability
score of 8 or higher and/or within an events-based area.
The program shall be established within two years of the effective date of the Source
Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-10 and MP-18 apply.
|
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-08 |
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity):
1. The land disposal of municipal waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and (b) of the definition of "land disposal" in s. 1 of Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act , is undertaken at the site; or
2. A site that is not approved to accept hazardous waste but accepts a waste described in clause (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous
waste as defined in Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act; or
3. The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL); or
4. The handling and storage of an organic solvent.
Municipalities shall provide, to residents, access to a minimum of eight hazardous
waste disposal days or opportunities per calendar year where products will be
accepted for disposal. The interval between hazardous waste days or opportunities
shall not exceed 210 days.
Municipalities may provide this service either:
a) on their own; or
b) in conjunction with upper tier or other lower tier municipalities; or
c) through other arrangements.
Furthermore, municipalities shall give due consideration to providing similar access to disposal opportunities for materials from agricultural uses.
The program shall be in effect within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-16 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-09 |
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity):
1. The land disposal of municipal waste, within the meaning of clauses (a) and
(b) of the definition of "land disposal" in s. 1 of Regulation 347 (General -
Waste Management) made under the Environmental Protection Act , is
undertaken at the site; or
2. A site that is not approved to accept hazardous waste but accepts a waste
described in clause (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous
waste as defined in Regulation 347 (General - Waste Management) made
under the Environmental Protection Act; or
3. The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL); or
4. The handling and storage of an organic solvent.
Municipalities shall discuss the feasibility and logistics of jointly offering a hazardous waste collection program that would provide an ongoing disposal opportunity to
property owners in the region.
Municipalities may provide this service either:
a) on their own;
b) in conjunction with upper tier or other lower tier municipalities; or
c) through other arrangements.
Discussions shall be initiated within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. The lead Source Protection Authority shall assist municipalities in
initiating these discussions.
Monitoring policy MP-17 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-1-HH |
This source protection plan came into effect on December 31, 2015, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Registry of Ontario. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for new and amended policies is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Registry of Ontario. Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set out by the Minister in the Notice of Approval.
a. For section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in or at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan takes effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location, policies regarding regulated activities apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date the notice is given. The policy timeline to establish risk management plans for existing significant threats identified through a Source Protection Plan update is within five years of the effective date of the updated Source Protection Plan.
b. For the purpose of section 43(2) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the deadline for amendments to prescribed instruments is three years from the date that the updated Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect.
c. For the purpose of section 40(2) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the official plans for the Region of Halton, the City of Hamilton, and the County of Wellington must be amended to conform to the significant threat policies no later than the time of the next five year review required by section 26 of the Planning Act.
d. For the purpose of section 40(2) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the official plans for the Town of Milton, the Town of Halton Hills, the Town of Oakville, and the City of Burlington, must be amended to conform to the significant threat policies no later than the time of the next five year review required by section 26 of the Planning Act.
e. For the purpose of section 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, zoning by-law conformity must be in accordance with the Planning Act.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-1-QUINTE |
Each municipality within the Source Protection Planning Area where drinking water threats could occur shall:
1) Develop and deliver an education and outreach program to all affected landowners and stakeholders making them aware of the vulnerable areas and the need to protect drinking water, describing any mandatory requirements and best management practices;
2) Harmonize the program with any existing education and outreach programs and share with other municipalities where this would result in increased efficiency and reduced cost;
3) Consult and cooperate with the Ontario Ministries, Health Units and Source Protection Authority (and any other agencies or stakeholders) to assist with the development and delivery of the education and outreach program where possible;
4) Describe the need for the preparation of emergency and spill contingency plans, and the process for doing so;
5) Ensure the program explains any incentive programs that may be available related to the specific significant threats;
6) Promote voluntary action to protect sources of drinking water and water conservation measures such as water saving fixtures, tips on how to save water in the house, water conserving appliances;
7) Update educational information as required and include specific policy related information about:
* Sewage
* Agriculture
* Pesticides
* Fertilizer
* Fuel
* DNAPLs
* Organic Solvents
Sewage
1) Ensure the program explains the purpose, details and implications of the onsite private sewage system inspection program; and
2) Ensure the program explains any mandatory decommissioning of existing on-site private sewage systems and any corresponding requirement to connect into an existing municipal sewage system.
Agriculture
1) Promote Environmental Farm Plan participation, voluntary nutrient management strategies and plans for farms where it is not a mandatory requirement under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002; and
2) Promote widespread adoption of best management practices for haulers/spreaders (e.g. pre-treatment of septage, method of incorporation into soil and timing of application).
Commercial Fertilizer/Pesticide
1) Develop and deliver an education and outreach program to all affected landowners, municipal works departments, and application companies making them aware of the vulnerable zones and the need to protect drinking water, describing any mandatory requirements and best management practices for the application of commercial fertilizers;
2) Ensure the program explains the purpose and details of any fertilizer/pesticide free buffer zones around sensitive environmental features;
3) Promote the use of soil tests for determining fertilizer application rates, use of slow release fertilizers, and record keeping; and
4) Advocate the use of alternatives to pesticide such as natural and eco-friendly methods that do not rely on pesticides.
Fuel
1) Ensure the program explains to TSSA, Canadian Oil Heat Association, Fuel Delivery Agents and Heating Oil Contractors the purpose, details and implications of appropriate Codes and Regulations on the use and maintenance of oil burning equipment; including the annual maintenance, inspection, and filling requirements as specified in Section 13 of the CSA Ontario Installation Code for Oil-Burning Equipment (Based on CSA B139, with Ontario Amendments) 1st Edition/2006. Explain the importance of protecting drinking water and the location of vulnerable areas;
2) Distribute stickers to be placed on the tank and fill pipes indicating the location within a vulnerable area and contact numbers in the event of a spill; and
3) Educate insurance, real estate companies and banks on the threats associated with fuel while emphasizing awareness of the location of the vulnerable zones and measures being taken by property owners, fuel delivery agents and home heating oil contractors.
DNAPLS/ Organic Solvents
Provide information about Household Hazardous Waste programs and other options for the disposal of products containing DNAPLs and organic solvents.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
The Quinte Source Protection Region
Tools: Education and Outreach pursuant to Section 26 of Ontario Regulation 287/07 and Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect:
Must conform (See Appendix C, List E) - for significant threats
Strategic (See Appendix C, List J) - for moderate and low threats
Effective Date: Within two years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List F and J):
The municipality shall report annually to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st on activities undertaken during the previous calendar year, as part of the education and outreach program for significant threats. |
Quinte |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-1-TCC |
Transitional Provisions and Definition of ""Existing""/""Future""
Policy G-1: Transitional Provisions
Applicable Activities: This policy applies to all policies in this Source Protection Plan.
G-1(1): A future significant drinking water threat is defined as the following:
An activity that is proposed to commence after the date the source
protection plan takes effect and is not an existing activity.
G-1(2): An existing significant drinking water threat is defined as the following:
a) An activity that has been engaged in prior to the date that the Trent Source Protection Plan takes effect and continues to occur;
b) An agricultural activity that has been engaged in at some time within the 10-year period prior to the date that the Trent Source Protection Plan takes effect;
c) An activity that is related to a development proposal where an application was made under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, or Building Code Act on a day before the source protection plan takes effect, including but not limited to a matter listed in G-1(3); or
d) An activity that is related to an application made for the issuance or amendment of a prescribed instrument on a day before the source protection plan takes effect.
G-1(3): For the purposes of G-1(2)c, a matter is deemed to have commenced prior to the date that the Trent Source Protection Plan takes effect:
a) In the case of a request for an official plan amendment, on the day the request is received;
b) In the case of an official plan, an amendment to it or a repeal of it, on the day the bylaw adopting the plan, amendment or repeal is passed;
c) In the case of a zoning bylaw or an amendment to it, on the day the bylaw is passed;
d) In the case of an application for an amendment to a zoning bylaw, on the day the application is made;
e) In the case of an application for an approval of development in a site plan control area under subsection 41 (4) of the Planning Act, on the day the application is made;
f) In the case of an application for a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning Act, on the day the application is made;
g) In the case of an application to amend or revoke an order under section 47 of the Planning Act, on the day the application is made;
h) In the case of an application for the approval of a plan of subdivision under section 51 of the Planning Act or an application for the approval of, or an exemption from an approval of, a condominium under section 9 of the Condominium Act, 1998, on the day the application is made; or
i) In the case of an application for a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act, on the day the application is made.
G-1(4): The expansion of a significant drinking water threat is defined as the following:
An increase in the scale of an activity already taking place on a property. The increase in scale may include, but is not limited to:
a) Increasing the area of land where an activity is taking place;
b) Increasing the amount of effluent or discharge from an activity;
c) Increasing the quantity of chemical or pathogen containing material handled or stored; or
d) Increasing the quantity of chemical or pathogen containing material applied.
The expansion of existing and future activities will be managed using the tool specified by the relevant policy(ies) in this plan to ensure that the expansion of the activity does not increase the risk to drinking water.
Where not otherwise specified in this plan, an expansion, alteration or replacement of an activity that would be more protective of municipal drinking water sources shall be permitted.
agricultural activity includes:
1) The application of agricultural source material to land;
2) The storage of agricultural source material;
3) The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
4) The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
5) The application of pesticide to land;
6) The handling and storage of pesticide; and
7) The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, and outdoor confinement area, or a farm-animal yard. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-10-SGSNBP |
The policy applies to all other policies contained in the Source Protection Plan for all activities and in all vulnerable areas described in those policies.
Where the term ‘existing activity’ is used in a source protection plan policy, the term
shall be interpreted to include:
1) an activity that existed or occurred on a property on the day prior to the
effective date of the Source Protection Plan; or
2) an activity that occurs seasonally or occasionally on the property and the
activity has occurred at some point within the four years prior to the effective
date of the Source Protection Plan; or
3) an activity where an application for one of the following approvals had been
submitted to the approval authority prior to the effective date of the Source
Protection Plan and a decision was pending or had been granted as of the
effective date of the Source Protection Plan:
a) an approval under one of the prescribed instruments (as defined by s. 1.0.1
of O.Reg 287/07); or
b) a building permit under the Building Code; or
c) an approval under the Planning Act or Condominium Act, including:
i. a request for an official plan amendment;
ii. an application for an amendment to a zoning by-law;
iii. an application for an approval of development in a site plan control area under subsection 41 (4) of the Planning Act;
iv. an application for a minor variance under section 45 of the Planning
Act;
v. an application to amend or revoke an order under section 47 of the
Planning Act;
vi. an application for the approval of a plan of subdivision under section
51 of the Planning Act;
vii. an application for a consent under section 53 of the Planning Act
viii. an application for the approval of, or an exemption from an approval
of, a condominium under section 9 of the Condominium Act, 1998;
Where an activity is considered to be an existing activity under clause (3) above:
A. other approvals as described by clauses 3(a) to 3(c) above which are necessary
for the activity may be granted by the approval authority at any time within
five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Where the term ‘future activity’ is used in a source protection plan policy, the term
shall be interpreted to include:
i) activities that were not in existence prior to the effective date of the Source
Protection Plan, except as described in clauses (1) to (3) above;
ii) activities that commence on or after the effective date of the Source
Protection Plan, except as described in clauses (3) above;
iii) activities proposed on or after the effective date of the Source Protection Plan;
iv) activities where an application for an approval under one of the prescribed
instruments (as defined by s. 1.0.1 of O.Reg 287/07) is submitted on or after
the effective date of the Source Protection Plan, except when allowed under
clause 3(a) above;
v) activities where an application for a building permit under the Building Code is
submitted on or after the effective date of the first Source Protection Plan, except when allowed under clause 3(b) above;
vi) activities where an application for an approval under the Planning Act or
Condominium Act is submitted on or after the effective date of the first Source
Protection Plan, except when allowed under clause 3(c) above.
The policy takes effect on the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-10-TCC |
Applicable Activities: This policy applies wherever a policy in this source protection plan affects decisions under the Planning Act.
G-10(1): Complete the required updates no later than at the time of the next 5-year review in accordance with section 26 of the Planning Act.
G-10(2): Report by February 1 each year to the applicable source protection authority on how the requirements of the policy were achieved. Where the approval authority is not the lower or single tier municipality, the report will be copied to all applicable municipalities. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
|
2 |
False |
|
G-11-SGSNBP |
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity):
1. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within
the meaning of Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act;
2. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects,
stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
3. The application to agricultural source material to land;
4. The storage of agricultural source material;
5. The application of non-agricultural source material;
6. The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material;
7. The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
8. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
9. The application of pesticide to land;
10. The handling and storage of pesticide;
11. The application of road salt;
12. The handling and storage of road salt;
13. The storage of snow;
14. The handling and storage of fuel;
15. The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phased liquid (DNAPL);
16. The handling and storage of an organic solvent;
17. The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of
aircraft;
18. An activity that takes water from an aquifer or surface water body without
returning the water taken to the same aquifer or surface water body;
19. An activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer;
20. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasture land, an outdoor confinement
area or a farm-animal yard.
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and/or the Ministry of
Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs should establish a Financial Support Fund. The
purpose of the fund would be to provide appropriate levels of monetary support for
landowners incurring identifiable financial losses and costs resulting from the
implementation of Source Protection Plan policies.
Claims for financial support should be submitted to, and reviewed by, a local review
committee to determine the acceptability of the claim and amount of support to be
paid.
Note: The financial support would not be available to cover the costs of
implementation activities or projects eligible under incentive program policies (Policy
Text ID G-05 in the Source Protection Plan).
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and/or Ministry of Agriculture,
Food and Rural Affairs should establish the Financial Support Fund within two years
of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-16 applies |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-11-TCC |
Applicable Activities: All activities listed in section 1.1 of the General Regulation under the Clean Water Act, 2006, in addition to the applicable local threat, that are existing significant drinking water threats or that would be future significant drinking water threats. (These are activities are listed in Section 2.3.2.1).
G-11(1): Update Municipal Master Emergency Plans to identify vulnerable areas where significant drinking water threats can occur and outline actions to be implemented in the event that these areas are compromised.
G-11(2): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of how the requirements of the policy were achieved. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-12 |
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat (existing activity or future activity):
1. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act;
2. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
3. The application to agricultural source material to land;
4. The storage of agricultural source material;
5. The application of non-agricultural source material;
6. The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material;
7. The application of commercial fertilizer to land;
8. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
9. The application of pesticide to land;
10. The handling and storage of pesticide;
11. The application of road salt;
12. The handling and storage of road salt;
13. The storage of snow;
14. The handling and storage of fuel;
15. The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phased liquid (DNAPL);
16. The handling and storage of an organic solvent;
17. The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of
aircraft;
18. An activity that takes water from an aquifer or surface water body without
returning the water taken to the same aquifer or surface water body;
19. An activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer
20. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasture land, an outdoor confinement
area or a farm-animal yard.
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change should consider providing
appropriate levels of financial assistance to municipalities for the costs of
implementing policies under Part IV (Prohibition, Risk Management Plan and
Restricted Land Uses) of the Clean Water Act.
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change should consider providing
appropriate levels of financial assistance to Conservation Authorities for the costs of
implementing the education program policies (Policy Text ID G-04 and WN-35).
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change should initiate discussions
concerning implementation funding within two years of the effective date of the
Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-02 applies |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-13 |
For all municipalities where a Wellhead Protection Area or an Intake Protection Zone
occurs in their jurisdiction and where activities are or would be significant drinking
water threats , it is recommended that the Municipality:
A. update their Emergency Response Plans to include:
1. maps to show the location of municipal drinking water systems and
associated Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones
2. emergency contact numbers and protocols for the respective water
treatment plant operating authority
3. spill contingency measures to prevent contamination of the drinking water
source
4. containment measures for water or chemicals used to deal with an
emergency (including fire suppressants)
B. ensure that local first responders have information about Wellhead Protection
Areas or Intake Protection Zones as the case may be.
Municipalities are strongly encouraged to implement these measures within one
year of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policy MP-26 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-14 |
The policy applies to the following activities in all vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat (existing activity):
1. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within
the meaning of Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act;
2. The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects,
stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
3. The storage of agricultural source material;
4. The application of non-agricultural source material;
5. The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material;
6. The application of pesticide to land;
7. An activity that takes water from an aquifer or surface water body without
returning the water taken to the same aquifer or surface water body;
8. An activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer;
9. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasture land, an outdoor confinement
area or a farm-animal yard.
The policy applies to all Ministries where an activity requires approval using a
Prescribed Instrument. The Ministry should undertake compliance/verification
inspections to confirm that any new or amended conditions of approval are, or have
been, implemented by the facility owner within 3 years of the date of the new or
amended approval to ensure that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a
significant drinking water threat. Ongoing inspections should be conducted at least
once every 5 years. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-2-F |
The Ministry of the Environment and the Spills Action Centre should update spill response procedures and emergency response plans for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources within a wellhead protection area or intake protection zone along highways, railway lines, and shipping lanes.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
All vulnerable areas where the release of contaminants in an IPZ or WHPA could result in contamination of the drinking water supply.
Tools: Specify Action (Section 26(6) of Ontario Regulation 287/07).
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: Within one year of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J):
The Ministry of the Environment should submit a report by February 1st of each year to the Quinte Source Protection Authority summarizing how plans and procedures were updated and any occurrence of spills in the vulnerable areas. |
Quinte |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-2-HH |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, unless identified specifically within a policy, all land uses except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purposes of Sections 57 and 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or Chief Building Official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is, or is not, designated for the purposes of section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a
site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or Chief Building Official, as applicable, is satisfied that:
• The application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and,
• The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
Where the Risk Management Official has provided written direction designating a land use for the purpose of section 59, a written Notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 as amended, in addition to Planning Act and Condominium Act applications in accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-2-TCC |
Any of the following activities would be an existing or future significant drinking water threat, and a policy in this source protection plan
specifies the use of a Prescribed Instrument:
i. Establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site
within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act;
ii. Establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects,
stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
iii. Application of agricultural source material to land;
iv. Storage of agricultural source material;
v. Application of commercial fertilizer to land;
vi. Application of pesticide to land;
vii. Use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard;
viii. Application of non-agricultural source material to land; and
ix. Handling and storage of non-agricultural source material.
G-2(1): The prescribed instruments for these activities will include provisions to ensure that the expansion of the activities do not result in significant drinking water threats.
G-2(2): The ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of the reviews completed during the calendar year on the Prescribed Instruments for existing significant drinking water threats, including a summary of the provisions included to ensure that the activity(ies) cease to be significant drinking water threats;
b) A summary of the reviews completed during the calendar year on the Prescribed Instruments for future activities, including a summary of the provisions included to ensure that the activity(ies) will not be significant drinking water threats;
c) A summary of inspections carried out and any orders issued as a result of an inspection during the preceding calendar year; and
d) Other content as specified in clauses S-3(3), A-2(2), and OT-1(7) |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-3-E & F |
Each municipality should update Emergency Response Plans, spill contingency plans and spill prevention plans for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources within a Wellhead Protection Area or Intake Protection Zone along highways, railway lines, and shipping lanes.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
All vulnerable areas where the release of contaminants in an IPZ or
WHPA could result in contamination of the drinking water supply.
Tools: Specify Action pursuant to Section 26(6) of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: Within one year of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J):
The municipality should provide copies, when updated, of the Emergency Response Plan, spill contingency plans and spill prevention plans by
February 1st to the Quinte Source Protection Authority and report annually on any emergencies during the previous calendar year that occurred in
the IPZs or WHPAs including the measures taken during and after the emergency to protect the drinking water supply.
|
Quinte |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-3-HH |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of section 58(1) - Regulated Activities, of the Clean Water Act and require the negotiation of a risk management plan as specified in the policy and where there could be a significant drinking water threat:
i. The application of agricultural source material on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act.
ii. The storage of agricultural source material on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act.
iii. The application of commercial fertilizer on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act.
iv. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer.
v. The handling and storage of pesticides.
vi. The handling and storage of road salt.
vii. The handling and storage of fuel under Ontario Regulation 213/01 and under Ontario Regulation 217/01, except home fuel oil tanks.
viii. The handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquid.
ix. The handling and storage of an organic solvent.
x. The use of land as a confinement area or a farm-animal yard on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act and the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-3-TCC |
Applicable Activities: All activities listed in section 1.1 of the General regulation under the Clean Water Act, 2006 that are existing significant drinking water threats or that would be future significant drinking water threats. (These activities are listed in Section 2.3.2.1).
G-3(1): To prevent the activity causing the threat, consider the purchase of properties located in the most vulnerable areas on an ongoing basis. Criteria for evaluating the feasibility of purchasing land can include, but are not limited to:
a) The nature of any existing and potential future significant drinking water threats;
b) The availability of the lands for purchase; and
c) The availability of funds and financial feasibility
G-3(2): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of any land purchases within a vulnerable area and how significant drinking water threats were eliminated as a result of the purchase. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-4-E |
For existing transport pathways (wells) within Wellhead Protection Areas:
1) Each municipality should require the decommissioning of known abandoned wells and upgrading or decommissioning of wells that do not meet the requirements of Regulation 903;
2) Each municipality should require wells constructed prior to the passing of Regulation 903 be upgraded to meet the current requirements for new well construction; and
3) The Ministry of the Environment is strongly encouraged to undertake an updated risk-based program analysis of the compliance program associated with the Wells Regulation 903 as amended, made under the Ontario Water Resources Act.
a. The program analysis should consider:
i. Increased MOE field presence with well contractors,
ii. Complaint response prioritization where the presence of a transport pathway would endanger sources of municipal drinking water, and
iii. Focusing resources in areas where improperly constructed, maintained or abandoned wells may increase the potential threat to municipal drinking water
sources.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment and Municipality
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas: WHPA A, B and C – Deloro, Madoc, Tweed, Point Anne and Peats Point.
Tools: Transport Pathway policy pursuant to Section 27 of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: Within three years of the Plan taking effect. |
Quinte |
Non-specific |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-4-HH |
The establishment, operation and maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is exempt from Environmental Compliance Approvals under the Environmental Protection Act is designated for the purpose of Section 57(1) - Prohibited Activities of the Clean Water Act where waste disposal would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-4-TCC |
Applicable Activities: All activities listed in section 1.1 of the General regulation under the Clean Water Act, 2006, in addition to the applicable local threat, that are existing significant drinking water threats or that would be future significant drinking water threats. (These activities are listed in Section 2.3.2.1).
G-4(1): Support and facilitate the implementation of existing incentive programs, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program (ODWSP), that promote and financially support the use of best management practices for activities that are or would be significant drinking water threats in the source protection area on an ongoing basis.
G-4(2): Seek out incentive programs that promote and financially support the implementation of best management practices for activities that are or would be significant drinking water threats in the source protection area on an ongoing basis.
G-4(3): The Conservation Authority shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) The number and nature of significant drinking water threats that have been addressed using funding or technical assistance from an incentive program in the preceding calendar year. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-5 |
Applicable Activities: Any of the following activities is an existing significant drinking water threat or would be a future significant drinking water threat:
a) Establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act;
b) Establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
c) Application of agricultural source material to land;
d) Storage of agricultural source material;
e) Application of commercial fertilizer to land;
f) Handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
g) Application of pesticide to land;
h) Handling and storage of pesticide;
i) Use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area, or a farm-animal yard;
j) Application of non-agricultural source material to land;
k) Handling and storage of non-agricultural source material;
l) Application of road salt;
m) Handling and storage of road salt;
n) Handling and storage of fuel;
o) Handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid;
p) Handling and storage of an organic solvent;
q) Storage of snow; and
r) Maintaining open areas of mown grass for recreational activities that promote the congregation of waterfowl within or
near surface water bodies.
G-5(1): Requirement for Educational Program
Develop and implement an ongoing education and outreach program within two years. The program will seek to educate anyone engaging in an activity that is or would be a significant drinking water threat and may include, but is not limited to:
a) The location of vulnerable areas;
b) Best management practices that can minimize or eliminate the impacts of the subject activities on the drinking water source; and
c) The opportunities for funding under the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program (ODWSP) or other applicable incentive programs.
G-5(2): Consult with relevant provincial ministries, industry associations, and other relevant organizations during the development of the education and outreach programs required by (1).
G-5(3): Option for Alternate Implementing Body
The municipality may enter into an agreement with a conservation authority or other third party that identifies the third party as the implementing body for the education and outreach program required by (1) and(2), and related reporting requirements (7).
G-5(4): Option for Harmonization with Existing Programs
The education and outreach program required by (1) can be harmonized with existing education and outreach programs, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program (ODWSP), where this would result in an increase in efficiency or cost-effectiveness.
G-5(5): Specific Provisions for Fuel Storage Education Program
Where an education and outreach program required by (1) is developed to address the storage of liquid fuel in a tank at a facility as defined in section 1 of O. Reg. 213/01 (Fuel Oil) made under the Technical Standards and Safety Act, 2000, the program will include, at a minimum:
a) The mandatory requirements for fuel tank usage and maintenance;
b) Best management practices for fuel tank usage and maintenance;
c) Distribution of a sticker to be placed on oil tanks and fill pipes that indicates that the tank is located in a vulnerable area and provides a procedure to follow in the event of a fuel spill or leak, and a spill response contact number; and
d) Coordinate with relevant associations to make use of existing stickers or to create a consistent product required to comply with (c).
G-5(6): Specific Provisions for Fuel Handling Education Program
Where an education and outreach program required by (1) is developed to address the handling of liquid fuel in relation to its storage at a facility as defined in section 1 of O. Reg. 213/01 (Fuel Oil) made under the Technical Standards and Safety Act, 2000 or a facility as defined in section 1 of O. Reg. 217/01 (Liquid Fuels) made under the Technical Standards and Safety Act, 2000, the program will focus on source protection and emergency response.
G-5(7): Reporting Requirements
The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of the activities undertaken as part of the education and outreach program in the preceding calendar year. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-5-F |
All Transport Pathways
The municipality is strongly encouraged to oversee the creation of new transport pathways (including earth energy systems) within Wellhead Protection Areas so that they do not endanger the raw water supply of a municipal drinking water system. The municipality should require the proponent to demonstrate that the municipal water supply is not endangered. Depending on the type of transport pathway, this may include the requirement for studies and inspections.
Earth Energy Systems
The municipality should address specific requirements for geothermal/earth energy systems by ensuring that building permits are issued for earth energy systems in accordance with the Ontario Building Code.
The municipality should not issue any permits for vertical closed loop earth energy systems in the WHPA A and B zones. In the WHPA C and D zones, the municipality should require that the sealing of vertical boreholes be completed in a manner similar to that required for water wells as outlined in Ontario Regulation 903.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
All Transport Pathways
WHPA A - Deloro, Madoc, Tweed, Point Anne and Peats Point.
Earth Energy Systems - Vertical Closed Loop
WHPA A and B - Deloro, Madoc, Tweed, Point Anne and Peats Point.
Earth Energy Systems Sealing Requirements - Vertical Boreholes
WHPA C and D - Deloro, Madoc, Tweed, Point Anne and Peats Point.
Tools: Transport Pathway policy pursuant to Section 27(1b) of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J):
Each municipality should prepare a report for the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year summarizing how this policy was implemented and the number of Transport Pathways that have been proposed and approved during the previous calendar year. |
Quinte |
Non-specific |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-5-HH |
In accordance with Section 97 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and other Ontario provincial ministries shall provide ongoing funding and support for education, outreach and incentive programs to address significant drinking water threats. Where the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities as source protection authorities are implementing bodies, policy implementation is dependent on funding from the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks or other provincial ministries or municipalities. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-6 |
Policy G-6: Signage for Vulnerable Areas
Applicability: This policy applies to all municipal drinking water systems in the Trent source protection areas.
G-6(1): In collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment and in consultation with source protection authorities, design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards to identify the locations of wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones.
G-6(2): Manufacture, install, and maintain the signs required by (1) along Provincial Highways within wellhead protection areas with a vulnerability score of 10 and/or within intake protection zones or a wellhead protection area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
G-6(3): Purchase, install, and maintain the signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the applicable Source Protection Authorities. The signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within wellhead protection areas with a vulnerability score of 10 and/or intake protection zones or a wellhead protection area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
G-6(4): If similar signs are already in place, the sign identified in Policy G-6(3) will be used for all future replacement of the existing signs.
G-6(5): The municipality and the ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of the measures taken to implement (1), (2), and / or (3) for the preceding calendar year. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-6-F |
The Ministry of the Environment is strongly encouraged to undertake an updated risk-based program analysis of the compliance program associated with the Wells Regulation 903 as amended, made under the Ontario Water Resources Act.
The program analysis should consider:
· Increased MOE field presence with well contractors;
· Complaint response prioritization where the presence of a transport pathway would endanger sources of municipal drinking water; and
· Focusing resources in areas where improperly constructed maintained or abandoned wells may increase the potential threat to municipal drinking water sources.
This policy complements Policy G-4-F.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA B, C and D – Deloro, Madoc, Tweed, Point Anne (WHPA B and C only) and Peats Point.
Tools: Transport Pathway policy pursuant to Section 27(1)(b) of Ontario Regulation 287/07.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: When the Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J):
The Ministry shall prepare an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of this Source Protection Plan policy and make that report available to the Quinte Source Protection Authority February 1st each year. It is recommended the report include the number of inspections conducted, deficiencies found and remedial measures taken during the previous calendar year. |
Quinte |
Non-specific |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-7 |
Applicable Policy Tool: This policy applies wherever a policy in this Source Protection Plan designates an activity for the purpose of section 57 (Prohibition) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
G-7(1): The Risk Management Official will undertake the reporting requirements specified in section 65 of the General Regulation made under the Clean Water Act, 2006 by February 1 each year for the preceding calendar year.
G-7(2): The following land use activities are not permitted where they would be a future significant drinking water threat, unless stated otherwise in this source protection plan:
a) The application or storage of agricultural source material;
b) The management of agricultural source material (i.e., aquaculture);
c) The application, handling, or storage of non-agricultural source material;
d) The application, handling, or storage of commercial fertilizer;
e) The application, handling, or storage of pesticide;
f) The handling or storage of road salt;
g) The storage of snow;
h) The handling or storage of fuel;
i) The handling or storage of a dense non aqueous phase liquid;
j) The handling or storage of an organic solvent; or
k) The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-7-E&F |
Each municipality should provide opportunities for its residents to dispose of household hazardous waste in an appropriate manner.
Implementer: Municipality
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
All vulnerable areas where Hazardous Materials such as DNAPLs and Organic Solvents could be significant, moderate, or low drinking water threats.
Tools: General Education and Outreach pursuant to Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: Within one year of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J):
Each municipality should report annually by February 1st to the Quinte Source Protection Authority on activities undertaken related to the disposal of Household Hazardous Waste during the previous calendar year. |
Quinte |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-8 |
Applicable Policy Tool: This policy applies wherever a policy in this Source Protection Plan designates an activity for the purpose of section 58 (Risk Management Plan) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
G-8(1): Timelines for Risk Management Plans
a) Risk management plans must be established within five years;
b) The provisions of the risk management plan must be initiated within two years following agreement with the Risk Management Official, unless otherwise specified in
the risk management plan.
G-8(2): Prioritization of Risk Management Plans by Risk Management Official
Within one year, the Risk Management Official will prioritize the development of risk management plans for all existing significant drinking water threats within their jurisdiction.
G-8(3): Miscellaneous Provisions for Risk Management Plans
Risk management plans required by policies in this source protection plan must:
a) Address the portion of the property where the activity is a significant drinking water threat;
b) Consider existing risk management measures being undertaken on the property;
c) Include provisions to ensure that the expansion of any existing facilities, where applicable, does not result in significant drinking water threats;
d) Include provisions for relocating the activity to the location on the property with the least risk, where applicable;
e) Include provisions to address emergency response for occurrences that could
result in a contamination event; and
f) Include provisions to ensure that the Risk Management Official is notified of a
change in ownership of the subject property, and to update the risk management plan accordingly.
Where more than one significant drinking water threat has been identified on a
property, a single risk management plan can be developed to address the threats.
G-8(4): Monitoring of Risk Management Plans
The Risk Management Official will undertake the reporting requirements specified in section 65 of the General Regulation under the Clean Water Act, 2006 by February 1 each year for the preceding calendar year. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-8-E&F |
The Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities, should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways in the applicable areas noted below.
Municipalities will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with Source Protection Authorities. These signs should be placed on municipal arterial roads to identify the vulnerable areas in the applicable areas noted below.
Implementer: Municipality and Ministry of Transportation
Applicable Area: This policy applies to the following areas:
WHPA's A and B with a vulnerability score of 10 and WHPA E and IPZ's with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher where major roads (Provincial, regional and municipal roads) cross through the vulnerable area.
Tools: General Education and Outreach pursuant to Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: Within two years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J):
The municipality and Ministry of Transportation should provide annual records of the location and numbers of signs installed during the previous calendar year, in each of the vulnerable areas to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st of each year. |
Quinte |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
G-9 |
Applicable Activities: Activities listed in section 1.1 of the General regulation under the Clean Water Act, 2006 that would be a future significant drinking water threat. (These activities are listed in Section 2.3.2.1).
G-9(1): All land uses located in areas where an activity would be a significant drinking water threat that are also designated for the purposes of section 57 (Prohibition) or section 58 (Risk Management Plans) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, are designated as Restricted Land Uses for the purpose of section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Approval authority under the Planning Act and Building Code Act
G-9(2): Direct proponents applying for building permits related to the construction or change of use of a building, or applications related to the provisions of the Planning Act prescribed by the Clean Water Act, within areas identified in (1), to the Risk Management Official for the issuance of a notice under section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
G-9(3): Add the section 59 notice from the Risk Management Official as an item required for a complete application under the Planning Act.
[1] Prescribed provisions of the Planning Act are given in section 62 of O. Reg. 287/07 and include applications for: official plan and zoning bylaw amendments, development in site plan control areas, minor variances, approval of plans of subdivision, consents, and authorization of temporary uses. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
G-9-F |
The Ministry of the Environment should evaluate the need to expand the Drinking Water Surveillance Program and review the mandate of the program to include monitoring for contaminants originating from the threat activities identified in Assessment Reports. If expanded, the Ministry should review opportunities to include additional drinking water system owners. If additional drinking water systems can be added, municipalities that are not already included in the program should participate.
Implementer: Ministry of the Environment and the municipalities with municipal drinking water systems.
Applicable Areas: This policy applies to the following areas: All WHPA As and IPZ 1s with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
Tools: Education and Outreach pursuant to Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
Legal Effect: Strategic (See Appendix C, List J)
Effective Date: Within two years of the Plan taking effect.
Monitoring Policy (See Appendix C, List J): The municipality and the Ministry of the Environment should provide an annual summary of implementation activities related to this policy to the Quinte Source Protection Authority by February 1st. |
Quinte |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall take effect on the date set by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan or amendment took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding restricted land uses shall take effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the Township to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, and where they are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Township, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
e. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan or amendment takes effect.
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Official Plan and Zoning By Laws must be amended to conform with the significant threat policies and adopted by municipal council by the next five (5) year Official Plan update as required under subsection 26(1) of the Planning Act or within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-1.15 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-1.2 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses in the Township of Southgate's official plan and zoning by-law that are located within a vulnerable area where significant drinking water threats may be subject to Section 57 or 58 policies, are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act (as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07 Section 62) or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purpose of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the building official, as the case may be, that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-1.4 |
The Township in collaboration with Conservation Authorities and other bodies
where possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs
directed at any, or all, significant drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean
Water Act, 2006, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate
by the Township and subject to available funding. Such programs may include,
but not necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of
significant drinking water threats and promotion of best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-1.5 |
The Township, in collaboration with other bodies and levels of government where possible, may develop and implement incentive programs directed at various
significant threat activities prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Township,
subject to available funding. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-2.2 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-2.4 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-3.1 |
To ensure any existing or new septic system and holding tanks with a design flow
of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario
Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never
becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be,
a significant drinking water threat, the Township shall implement an on-site septic
system maintenance inspection program. Inspections should be prioritized based
on the proximity to the drinking water supply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-5.1 |
To ensure the:
Existing and future application of pesticides to land; and
Existing handling and storage of pesticide
cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required, except for residential properties. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-5.2 |
To ensure the:
Existing and future application of agricultural source material to land;
Existing and future storage and handling of agricultural source material;
Existing and future storage and handling of non-agricultural source material;
Existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land;
Existing and future storage and handling of commercial fertilizer;
Future handling and storage of pesticides; and
Existing and future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard
cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-5.3 |
To ensure the:
a. Existing and future application of pesticides to land; and
b. Existing handling and storage of pesticides
cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where such
activities are or would be significant drinking water threats on residential
properties, the Township shall develop and implement an education and outreach
program.
Such a program may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing
awareness and understanding of the drinking water threats and promotion of best
management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-6.1 |
To ensure any existing or new handling and storage of road salt and the storage of snow cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-7.1 |
To ensure the existing or future handling and storage of fuel equal to or less than
2,500 Litres ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the
Township shall develop and implement an education and outreach program
outlining the requirements under the fuel oil code by the Technical Standards and
Safety Authority and best management practices that could be implemented. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-7.2 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of fuel of more than 2,500 Litres ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
For significant threats that are Technical Standards and Safety Authority regulated, the Risk Management Plan should be scoped to a contaminant management plan and any monitoring, reporting and auditing requirements provided to the Technical Standards and Safety Authority. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-7.3 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of liquid fuel of more than 2,500 Litres never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat; this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-8.1 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural purposes within a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-8.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial institutional and agricultural purposes within Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) A, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the storage and handling of dense non-aqueous phase liquids shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-8.3 |
To ensure any existing or new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous
phase liquid ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township in
consultation with the Township of Melancthon and the County of Dufferin, where
applicable, shall develop and implement an education and outreach program to
encourage the use of alternative products, where available, and the proper
handling/storage and disposal procedures for these products.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-9.1 |
To ensure any existing handling and storage of organic solvents ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-CW-9.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of organic solvents and the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircrafts never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities would be a significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-MC-1.3 |
The Township and Counties of Grey and Dufferin shall amend their Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws to:
- Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies; and
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-MC-2.1 |
To ensure any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, will ensure that this activity is managed to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-MC-2.3 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-MC-3.2 |
To ensure the establishment of any new on-site septic system and holding tanks with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Township and County of Grey, where applicable, shall prohibit development which relies on this type of on-site septic system within the municipal planning approval process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-MC-3.3 |
To ensure any existing or new sewage treatment plant with effluent and/or bypass discharge or new sewage treatment plants with sewage storage tanks ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process for such sewage treatment plants on lands located within identified vulnerable areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-MC-3.4 |
To ensure any existing or new sanitary sewer and related pipes ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall review and, if necessary, amend or prepare Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that appropriate terms and conditions are incorporated that when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water. The terms and conditions may include requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake regular maintenance and inspections. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-MC-3.5 |
To ensure any existing or new discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-MC-4.1 |
To ensure the future application of Non-Agricultural Source Material to land never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs or the Ministry of the Environment, as applicable, shall not approve this activity in a Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act or an Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-NB -1.6 |
The Ministry of Environment and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support for incentive programs to protect existing
and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, such as through the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program and the Rural
Water Quality Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
|
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-NB-1.13 |
To ensure the protection of drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes, the Township, County of Grey and the Ministry of the Environment are encouraged to incorporate the Wellhead Protection Area mapping into their Emergency Response Plan and Spills Action Centre mapping. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-NB-1.14 |
The Township is requested to support ongoing programs, which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903, within all vulnerable areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-NB-1.6 |
The Ministry of Environment and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support for incentive programs to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, such as through the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program and the Rural Water Quality Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GC-S-NB-10.1 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water due to the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or under the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the pipeline proponent, the Canada Energy Regulator, and Ontario Energy Board are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the Township the location of any new proposed pipeline within the Township and/or Source Protection Area.
The Source Protection Authority shall document in the annual report the number of new pipelines proposed within vulnerable areas if a pipeline has been proposed and/or an application has been received.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
GEN-1 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purposes of Sections 57 and 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or Chief Building Official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use designation is, or is not, designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or Chief Building Official, as applicable, is satisfied that:
a. The application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and,
b. The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
Where the Risk Management Official has provided written direction designating a land use for the purpose of section 59, a written Notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 as amended, in addition to Planning Act and Condominium Act applications in accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GEN-2 |
Where an activity requires a Risk Management Plan, the municipality shall ensure through their authority that the RMO and RMI responsible for enforcement will establish a priority for how inspections will be conducted to ensure that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat. Ongoing inspections should be conducted at least once every 5 years or on a basis deemed appropriate by the RMO and RMI.
Timeline: See Policy |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GEN-3 |
Where an activity requires approval using a Prescribed Instrument, the regulatory authority shall undertake compliance/verification inspections to confirm that any new or amended conditions of approval are, or have been, implemented by the facility owner within 3 years of the date of the new or amended approval to ensure that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat. Ongoing inspections should be conducted at least once every 5 years or on a basis deemed appropriate by the Issuing Director.
Timeline: See Policy |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GEN-4 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should maintain and expand the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program and/or fund other relevant programs to enable local delivery to implement risk management measures for the following activities where they are a significant drinking water threats:
a) Septic systems governed under the Building Code Act;
b) Application and storage of ASM;
c) Application, handling and storage of NASM;
d) Use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard;
e) Application, handling and storage of fertilizer; and
f) Application, handling and storage of pesticide.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GEN-5 |
Where an activity is a significant drinking water threat, the municipality shall consider providing incentive programs to encourage actions to reduce the risks to source water.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GEN-6 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to continue its funding to municipalities and Source Protection Authorities under source protection programs to continue local research into Issues (nitrogen, pathogen, sodium, chloride) to determine where the following activities are a contributing source of the contaminant in Issue Contributing Areas:
a) Application of untreated septage to land;
b) The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage;
c) Application and storage of ASM;
d) Application, handling and storage of NASM;
e) Use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard;
f) Application, handling and storage of fertilizer;
g) Application, handling and storage of road salt; and
h) Storage of snow.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GEN-7 |
Where municipal groundwater monitoring shows increasing or decreasing trends and/or exceeds Ontario Drinking Water Standards, the municipality shall investigate and share the information with the RMO, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (for nitrates or pathogens) and the Source Protection Authority.
Timeline:
T-12: Research shall be initiated within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, contingent on funding. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GEN-8 |
Where education and outreach materials are prepared and delivered to significant drinking water threat areas, the municipality is encouraged to deliver those materials to affected properties and businesses in moderate and low threat areas.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-1 |
The Municipality shall establish an education and outreach program where activities could be a significant drinking water threat. The program shall be targeted at residents, farms, and businesses. The program shall promote:
General Source Protection awareness including the location of vulnerable areas
Best management practices to reduce or eliminate impacts from activities which pose a threat to source water
Proper septic system care and maintenance
Awareness of Ontario's cosmetic pesticide ban and best management practices where pesticides are used under an exemption from the ban
The importance of complying with all content of the Pesticide Safety Course and best management practices regarding the handling and storage of pesticides
Area-wide education and outreach programs promoting integrated pest management and alternative pest control, targeting golf courses and sports fields
Participation in the Environmental Farm Plan Program
Awareness regarding non-agricultural source material application for landowners
Safer alternatives to dense non-aqueous phase liquids and organic solvents
Proper disposal of dense non-aqueous phase liquids and organic solvents; program will target both commercial/industrial and residential landowners
Awareness of stormwater management relating to storm-drains and the dangers linked to dumping chemicals into drains within the urban sewer catchment area
The creation and promotion of a year-round depot drop-off for hazardous wastes
Working with the Source Protection Authority to access funding or other applicable incentive programs
Best management practices for waste that is not regulated by the MOECC through means other than Prescribed Instruments.
The Municipality shall establish an education and outreach program to inform people about the importance of proper construction, operation and maintenance of their oil burning equipment (furnace, generator) and promote alternative fuel options. The program could include:
Distribution of a sticker to be placed on oil tanks that indicates that the tank is located in a vulnerable area and provides a procedure to be followed in the event of a fuel spill or leak, including a spill response contact number
Promotion of existing incentive programs including incentive programs for switching to alternative fuel sources
Provide information relating to:
The mandatory requirements for fuel tank usage and maintenance
The best management practices for fuel tank usage and maintenance
Promotion of the importance of having pollution liability insurance
Once established, these programs shall be on-going with materials being disseminated intermittently as deemed appropriate. Education and outreach programs should be harmonized with existing education and outreach programs where this would result in an increase in efficiency or cost-effectiveness.
The Municipality may enter into an agreement with a third party to implement the education and outreach program and/or any related reporting.
The program shall be implemented within two years of the Plan taking effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-4. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-10 |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, it is recommended that the Spills Action Centre review and update contact information and procedure cards to include the Intake Protection Zone and Wellhead Protection Area delineations and updated procedures for contacting drinking water plant operators who may be affected by the spill. This will ensure that drinking water sources are protected in the event of a spill originating from transportation corridors (rail, highways as defined in Subsection 1(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, 1990, St. Lawrence Seaway and the Ottawa River).
It is recommended that the Spills Action Centre work with all levels of the St. Lawrence Seaway authority including the Great Lakes Pilot Authority and the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation to ensure that Seaway pilots are aware of Intake Protection Zones and understand the procedures to follow in the event of a spill. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-11 |
In accordance with Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within the Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or within an Intake Protection Zone or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
Municipalities will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the SPAs. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or an Intake Protection Zone or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
The above policies will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan within each Source Protection Area.
This policy should be implemented within two years after the effective date of the Plan. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-12 |
It is recommended that the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change work with the Ontario Pesticides Education Program Committee to review the Ontario Pesticides Education Program and consider the incorporation of Source Protection information into the education. The pesticide education materials should teach pesticide applicators how to find out if their lands are in a Wellhead Protection Area or an Intake Protection Zone. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-13 |
It is strongly recommended that Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change continue to support and facilitate the implementation of existing incentive programs that protect drinking water sources, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program (ODWSP). It is also recommended that the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change promote and encourage other Provincial incentive programs that promote the implementation of best management practices for activities that are significant drinking water threats. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-2 |
For the purpose of the Source Protection Plan, an activity will be considered existing if:
- It occurred on the property within the last 12 months before the Plan takes effect, or in the case of activities related to agriculture, wherever the local zoning permitted agricultural uses prior to the plan taking effect
- It has not yet occurred but is associated with a development for which a complete application for regulatory or planning approvals has been submitted and accepted before the day the Plan takes effect |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-3 |
Where a Source Protection policy specifies that Section 39.1 (planning decisions), Section 40 (Official Plan) and Section 42 (zoning by-laws) of the Clean Water Act, 2006 apply, the respective Planning Approval Authority shall amend the Official Plan no later than the time of the five year review period. Zoning by-laws must be updated within three years of the Official Plan amendments to bring them into conformity with the Official Plan (Section 26(9) of the Planning Act, 1990).
Note: Planning Act, 1990 decisions must conform immediately when the Plan takes effect. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-4 |
Prescribed Instruments which exist on the day the Plan takes effect must be reviewed and, if necessary, amended within three years from the date the Plan takes effect. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-5 |
The timeline for establishing a Risk Management Plan is left to the discretion of the Risk Management Official. Additionally, where a policy in this Source Protection Plan requires the development of a Risk Management Plan (RMP), the RMP must only address the portion of the property where the activity is a significant drinking water threat and must consider all existing risk management measures being undertaken on the subject property.
Where policies in this Source Protection Plan require the development of a RMP for more than one type of significant drinking water threat on the same property, a single RMP may be developed to address all threats. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-6 |
To ensure the application of Section 57 (prohibition) and 58 (Risk Management Plan) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land-uses as defined in local zoning by-laws are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (restricted land uses) of the Clean Water Act, 2006 within the vulnerable areas.
This applies specifically to these policies related to significant threats in Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones:
AG-2: Existing and future agricultural activities subject to a Risk Management Plan
CHEM-1: Risk Management Plans for existing chemical threats
CHEM-2: Prohibition of future chemical threats
FUEL-1: Existing and future fuel oil storage (O. Reg. 213/01) subject to a Risk
Management Plan
FUEL-2: Risk Management Plan for liquid fuels (O. Reg. 217/01)
FUEL-4: Prohibition of future liquid fuel facilities (O. Reg. 217/01)
PEST-2: The existing and future application, storage, and handling of pesticide
subject to a Risk Management Plan
PEST-3: Prohibition of future commercial storage and handling of pesticide
SALT-2: Risk Management Plans for existing storage of road salt and snow
SALT-3: Prohibition of future storage of salt and snow
WASTE-3: Risk Management Plans for existing waste sites without a Prescribed
Instrument
WASTE-4: Prohibition of future waste sites without a Prescribed Instrument
If the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the approval authority that a significant drinking water threat activity will not occur, notice under s. 59 (2) is not required. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-7 |
Section 27(3) and (4) of O. Reg. 287/07 (under the Clean Water Act, 2006) requires municipalities to provide notice to the Source Protection Authority when pathways are created or modified. The Municipality should review new earth energy systems within Wellhead Protections Areas (WHPAs) to ensure they do not endanger the municipal drinking water system.
It is recommended that the Municipality:
prohibit the installation of all types of earth energy systems in WHPA-A;
require* a qualified hydrogeologist to oversee the design and installation of new earth energy projects (with the exception of horizontal closed loop systems) in WHPA-B to ensure that the construction of the system meets the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and does not result in groundwater contamination. For a residential system, the hydrogeologist should assess the potential of encountering problems (such as multiple aquifers, cross-connection of aquifers and differing water quality) and make recommendations to mitigate them, including alterations to the design of the system; and
keep relevant records for new earth energy systems within WHPAs,
*The Canadian Standards Association requires that a commercial/institutional system be designed and inspected by a professional engineer and require that a hydrogeologist undertake a site survey. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-8 |
Where sewage, organic solvents, and/or dense non-aqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) could be a significant threat, Municipalities should consider creating or strengthening sewer-use by-laws to place limits on waste discharges. This by-law should encourage best management practices to reduce release of sewage, organic solvents and DNAPLs into sewers.
The Municipality shall report to the Source Protection Authority when sewer-use by-laws come into effect or are updated or strengthened to include limits on waste discharges.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-5. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
GENERAL-9 |
For areas which include a Wellhead Protection Area or an Intake Protection Zone along a transportation corridor (railways, highways as defined in Subsection 1(1) of the Highway Traffic Act, 1990, St. Lawrence Seaway, and the Ottawa River) it is recommended that the Municipality update their Emergency Response Plans to include:
Maps of the Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones
Emergency contact numbers and protocols for the respective water treatment plant operating authority
Measures to prevent contamination of the drinking water source from spills and/or chemicals used to deal with an emergency (including fire suppressants) |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HAZ1 |
Where there could be a threat from the existing or future handling or storage of DNAPLs or organic solvents, the Municipality, in association with
appropriate partners, shall plan and deliver an education and outreach program designed to ensure those involved in such activities are aware of the risks
posed to source water, how to reduce those, and how to recognize and respond to a spill. The program shall be designed within two years of the date the Source
Protection Plan takes effect and delivered if the activity is occurring where the threat would be significant. Further, the program shall be made available on
an ongoing basis and updated as is deemed appropriate by the Municipality. The program shall be delivered to all persons that could be engaged in the activity
of handling and storage of a DNAPLs or organic solvents where the threats could be significant in the following vulnerable areas:
Mattawa WHPA-A, B and C (except
for areas in Mattawan Township);
Powassan WHPA-A, B and C;
Additionally the policy may be more broadly delivered to a whole Municipality or any part of the Source Protection Area, at the discretion of a municipal council. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date as set by the Minister.
a. Where the Source Protection Policies require the County of Haldimand to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, and where they are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the County of Haldimand and subject to available funding, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the relevant policies within date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if a significant drinking water threat activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan tool effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan or amendment takes effect; and
c. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws must be amended to conform to the significant threat policies and adopted by municipal council by the next five (5) year Official Plan update as required under subsection 26(1) of the Planning Act or within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within Source Protection Plan takes effect and the Zoning By-law within three (3) years from the adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment.
|
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-1.10 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean
Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and
Schedules.
g. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats and Circumstances (swpip.ca), Clean Water Act, 2006.
h. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to
refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any
subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is
also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the
Province or the municipality. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-1.3 |
To ensure the following activities cease to be or never become significant drinking
water threats, where the activities are or would be a significant drinking water
threat, the County of Haldimand will develop and implement education and
outreach programs for the following activities:
a. The existing and future establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste
disposal site, within the meaning of Part V or the Environmental Protection
Act that does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval. The
program should focus on the proper handling, storage and disposal of
wastes;
b. The future storage of sewage and/or sewage treatment plant effluent
discharges. The program should focus on improving the knowledge of
operators, the general public and elected officials about the performance
and operation of sewage treatment plants;
c. The existing and future application of commercial fertilizer and pesticides to
land. The program should encourage the use of best management
practices;
d. The existing handling and storage of commercial fertilizer and pesticides.
The program should outline, at a minimum, the requirements of proper
maintenance for commercial fertilizer and pesticide storage and the steps to
be taken if there is a spill or leak detected;
e. The existing handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids
(DNAPL) and organic solvents. The program should outline, at a minimum,
the requirements of proper maintenance for DNAPL and organic solvents
storage and the steps to be taken if there is a spill or leak detected;
f. The future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor
confinement area or farm animal yard. The program should encourage
landowners to use best management practices. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-1.9 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water
Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the policies
of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the circumstances shown
on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed interpretation of the boundaries
relies on the mapping in the approved Assessment Report and the Specific
Circumstances found in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act,
2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer
to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any subsequent
amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also applicable to
any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the
municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-11.1 |
To ensure that future runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircrafts
never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be
a significant drinking water threat, Haldimand County shall encourage the Airport
Authority as part of the airport approval process to use existing Federal regulations
for the proper management of the runoff from de-icing of aircrafts.
Further, Haldimand County shall document any environmental assessments that
have been initiated for new airport facilities within vulnerable areas and provide
them to the Source Protection Authority. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-3.12 |
To ensure that existing industrial effluent discharges cease to be a significant drinking
water threat, Haldimand County will contact industrial operators to request that they
provide their emergency contingency and/or protection plan and subsequent updates to
Haldimand County on an annual basis and to encourage industrial operators to list
significant drinking water threats within these plans to ensure the protection of drinking
water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-3.4 |
To ensure that any existing onsite sewage system, including upgrades and replacements to such system, with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act and located within an Intake Protection Zone, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, Haldimand County shall implement an onsite sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required under the Ontario Building Code Act. Inspections should be prioritized based on the proximity to the drinking water supply. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-3.6 |
To ensure that the storage of sewage and/or sewage treatment plant effluent discharges never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an
activity would be a significant drinking water threat, Haldimand County shall continue to participate in available programs such as the Grand River Watershed
Wastewater Optimization Program. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-7.1 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of road salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking
water threats, Haldimand County shall amend its winter maintenance and salt management plans to identify the Intake Protection Zone areas associated with
municipal drinking water systems, include source water protection policies and enhance best management practices in these areas.
Haldimand County shall amend its winter maintenance and salt management plans in accordance with this policy within five (5) years of the Source Protection Plan
approval. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-7.1-GR |
To ensure that the future application, handling and storage of road salt never becomes a
significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking water
threats, Haldimand County shall amend its winter maintenance and salt management
plans to identify the Intake Protection Zone areas associated with municipal drinking
water systems, include source water protection policies and enhance best management
practices in these areas.
Haldimand County shall amend its winter maintenance and salt management plans in
accordance with this policy within five (5) years of the Source Protection Plan approval. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-7.2 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of road salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking
water threats, Haldimand County will engage private de-icing contractors and request they amend their salt management plans to identify the Intake Protection
Zones, and to enhance best management practices within these areas.
Furthermore, private contractors will be encouraged to obtain “Smart About SaltTM” accreditation. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-CW-8.1 |
To ensure that the future storage of snow, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
Haldimand County shall prepare and/or amend its municipal planning approvals/current municipal plans such as its winter maintenance and salt management plans
to identify Intake Protection Zone areas associated with municipal drinking water systems, and may include source water protection measures including best
management practices to minimize the impact of winter snow storage. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-1.2 |
The County of Haldimand shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws to:
- Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any land use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by the Source Protection Plan; and
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform to the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-1.7 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall
a. Ensure that all Prescribed Instruments issued for Condition Sites include terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the risk to drinking water sources is managed. Appropriate conditions may include requirements for source control, remediation to provincial standards, monitoring and Contaminant Management Plans;
b. Ensure that Prescribed Instruments include a condition requiring the instrument holder to report on the actions taken and the status of the site to the Ministry of Environment, Source Protection Authority and the municipality on an annual basis; and
c. Provide to the County of Haldimand a copy of the new or revised Prescribed Instrument. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-1.7.2 |
The County of Haldimand shall require as a component of a complete application under the Planning Act the completion of an environmental screening process using
a contaminated sites protocol. The contaminated sites protocol will outline the criteria when a Record of Site Condition (RSC) will be required as part of the
Planning Act. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-10.1 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids and organic solvents for industrial, commercial or institutional purposes, never becomes a significant drinking water threat; Haldimand County will prohibit the activities through municipal planning tools. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-2.1 |
To ensure that any future waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-2.2 |
To ensure that any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-3.1 |
To ensure that any existing or future onsite sewage system regulated under Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Conservation and Parks shall ensure Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water sources. Terms and conditions may include, but not be limited to, inspection and monitoring protocols and upgrading requirements as system standards change. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-3.10 |
To ensure that existing and future industrial effluent discharges cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act. Terms and Conditions may include, but not be limited to, requirements for monitoring/reporting, education of operators and a high level of effluent treatment.
|
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-3.13 |
To ensure that sewage treatment plant by pass discharge to surface water never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-3.3 |
To ensure that future onsite sewage systems never become a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, Haldimand County shall only approve onsite sewage systems if:
a. Future lot sizes are of sufficient size to accommodate the required, onsite private servicing; and
b. A system evaluation prepared by a qualified individual has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of Haldimand County, the suitability of the lot size, location of the system and that the system will never become a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-3.5 |
To ensure that the future storage of sewage at a sewage treatment plant and/or sewage treatment plant effluent discharges never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, reduce the risk to drinking water sources. The terms and conditions may include, but not be limited to, strict criteria for effluent quality, appropriate sizing to reduce by-passes, and requirements for regular inspections and proactive maintenance of the works to prevent unplanned discharges.
|
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-3.7 |
To ensure that existing and new sanitary sewer and related pipes cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water sources. Terms and conditions may include, but not be limited to, increased inspection and monitoring protocols, improved leak detection and documentation of maintenance and repairs. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-3.8 |
To ensure that the discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility never becomes a significant drinking water threat, Haldimand County shall require all new developments with a discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, to include an integrated treatment approach for the stormwater and a requirement to explore alternatives to conventional stormwater management facilities. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-3.9 |
To ensure that existing and future discharge from a stormwater management facility never becomes or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water sources. Terms and conditions may include, but not be limited to, current best management practices, requirements for regular maintenance, periodic removal of accumulated sediment, lining of the pond, ongoing monitoring (by the owner) of the contaminant discharges, and other requirements to address site conditions.
|
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-4.1 |
To ensure that the future application and storage of agricultural source materials, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, never become a significant drinking water threat, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure Nutrient Management Strategies and Plans include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-5.1 |
To ensure that the application and storage and handling of non-agricultural source materials (NASM), where NASM is presently regulated under the Nutrient Management Act or the Environmental Protection Act cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities are or would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks or Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Foods and Rural Affairs shall ensure NASM Plans include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-6.2 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer and pesticides, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, never becomes a significant drinking water threat; Haldimand County shall prohibit the storage of commercial fertilizer and pesticides through municipal planning tools. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-7.3 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of road salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, future road salt storage facilities, where permitted by the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, will only be permitted if the road salt is contained in covered roof storage facilities and a salt impact assessment and/or salt management plan has been completed that demonstrates, to the satisfaction of Haldimand County, that negative impacts to municipal drinking water systems are minimized. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-MC-9.1 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of fuel greater than 2500 Litres never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be significant drinking water threat, Haldimand County shall prohibit this activity through municipal planning tools. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-1.7 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from spills that occur within an Intake Protection Zone along highways, railway lines and shipping lanes, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is encouraged to incorporate mapping of Intake Protection Zones into their Emergency Response Plan and Spills Action Centre mapping, respectively. The mapping should be included in both the Emergency Response Plan and Spill Action Centre resource mapping within two (2) years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-1.7.1 |
To address Conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should prioritize abatement activities on Conditions Sites located within Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-1.7.3 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and the County of Haldimand:
a. Shall meet at a minimum frequency of every six months for the purpose of mutually sharing information on Condition sites; and
b. Should mutually share information related, as appropriate, to technical investigations or remediation, technical data, actions taken by Ministry of Environment or by the County of Haldimand, inspections, other relevant information; and
c. Should develop an Information-Sharing Process document including requirements, if any, for meeting agendas, participants, the nature and format for the types of information to be mutually shared, and the Information-Sharing Process document should be developed within six months from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-1.8-GR |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from spills that occur within an Intake Protection
Zone along highways, railway lines and shipping lanes, Haldimand County shall request
all businesses and industries within an Intake Protection Zone with Spill Prevention /
Contingency Plans (‘Plan’) incorporate the information regarding the location of the Intake
Protection Zone into their Plans, including notifying the municipality when a spill occurs. If
a Plan does not exist, businesses / industries will be encouraged to prepare one as above
and to review it annually.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-1.8-LP |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from spills that occur within an Intake Protection Zone along highways, railway lines and shipping lanes, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is encouraged to incorporate mapping of Intake Protection Zones into their Emergency Response Plan and Spills Action Centre mapping, respectively. The mapping should be included in both the Emergency Response Plan and Spill Action Centre resource mapping within two (2) years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-1.9 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from spills that occur within an Intake Protection Zone along highways, railway lines and shipping lanes, Haldimand County shall request all businesses and industries within an Intake Protection Zone with Spill Prevention / Contingency Plans (Plan) incorporate the information regarding the location of the Intake Protection Zone into their Plans, including notifying the municipality when a spill occurs. If a Plan does not exist, businesses / industries will be encouraged to prepare one as above and to review it annually. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-3.11 |
To ensure that existing and future industrial effluent discharges never become or cease to be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider information in the approved Grand River Assessment Report and treat significant drinking water threat facilities as one of the program priorities when identifying facilities for inspection. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-3.12 |
To ensure that existing industrial effluent discharges cease to be a significant
drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat,
Haldimand County will contact industrial operators to request that they provide their
emergency contingency and/or protection plan and subsequent updates to
Haldimand County on an annual basis and to encourage industrial operators to list
significant drinking water threats within these plans to ensure the protection of
drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-3.2-GR |
To ensure that any existing onsite sewage system, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider providing on-going funding through the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program or a similar program for onsite sewage system upgrades and replacements. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-3.2-LP |
To ensure that any existing onsite sewage system, where such an activity is a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider providing on-going funding through the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program or a similar program for onsite sewage system upgrades and replacements. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-6.1-GR |
To ensure that the future application of pesticides to land, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider developing source water protection training materials for permit applicants under the Pesticides Act.
Further, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prioritize inspections of pesticide permit holders for lands within the Dunnville Water Treatment Plant Emergency Intake Protection Zone 1.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HC-NB-6.1-LP |
To ensure that the future application of pesticides to land, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider developing source water protection training materials for permit applicants under the Pesticides Act.
Further, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prioritize inspections of pesticide permit holders for lands within the Nanticoke Industrial Pumping Station Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall take effect on the date set out by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 policies regarding restricted land uses shall take effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require Halton Region to develop and implement education and outreach and/or incentive programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat and where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Region of Halton and subject to available funding, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
e. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, and,
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the Official Plans must be amended to conform with the significant threat policies and adopted by municipal council by the next five (5) year Official Plan update as required under subsection 26(1) of the Planning Act or within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect. Zoning and/or by-law conformity exercises may be completed within three (3) years of the completion of the Official Plan conformity exercise as per section 26(9) of the Planning Act.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-1.16 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Source Water Protection Tables of Drinking Water Threats and circumstances, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the municipality.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-1.2 |
The following transition provisions apply to the Source Protection Plan policies. For the purposes of this Plan, where one or more of the following has been received regarding a future significant threat activity prior to the Source Protection Plan coming into effect and where a policy in this Plan prohibits a ""future ; threat activity, the policy for managing ""existing ; drinking water threat activities applies in the following cases even though those activities will commence after the Source Protection Plan comes into effect:
A complete application for site plan approval under the Planning Act;
An application for Environmental Compliance Approval; or
A complete application for a Building Permit that significant threat activity shall be permitted subject to the policies pertaining to existing significant threat activity as well as any further applications required under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, and Building Permit or Prescribed Instruments required to implement the development proposal associated with this significant threat activity.
Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, this policy shall no longer apply. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-1.3 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, all land uses, with the exception of residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Section 57 and 58 of the Clean Water Act, are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses. Within these areas, a written Notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Notwithstanding, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the conditions that would permit a planning authority or building official to make a determination whether to: 1) designate a site specific residential land use as a Restricted Land Use; or 2) exempt a site specific land use from the Restricted Land Use designation. In order to exempt a site specific land use, the planning authority or building official must be satisfied that:
a. The application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and
b. The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-1.5 |
Halton Region, in collaboration with other bodies where desirable, may develop and
implement education and outreach programs directed at any, or all, significant threat
activities prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 where such programs are
deemed necessary and/or appropriate by Halton Region and subject to available
funding. Such programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing
awareness and understanding of drinking water threats and promotion of best
management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-1.6 |
Halton Region, in collaboration with other implementing bodies and levels of government where desirable, may develop and implement incentive programs directed at various significant threat activities prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Region and subject to available funding. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-10.1 |
Where existing and future handling and storage of fuel is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area excluding fuel oil tanks with storage of fuel less than or equal to 2,500 Litres:
Future handling and storage of fuel for a retail gas station or bulk fuel storage facility excluding bulk fuel storage associated with a municipal emergency generator facility within a Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A) are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The handling and storage of fuel, excluding those prohibited in HR-CW-10.1a within a Wellhead Protection Area A and B (WHPA-A, WHPA-B), has been designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Risk Management Plan shall contain monitoring, reporting and auditing requirements to ensure this activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-10.3 |
The Region of Halton shall develop and implement an education and outreach
program for the handling and storage of fuel in quantities less than or equal to
2,500 Litres outlining the requirements of owning a heating oil system including proper
maintenance and the steps to be taken if there is a spill or leak detected to ensure this
activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-11.1 |
The Region of Halton shall develop and implement an education and outreach
program for the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquid and organic
solvents to encourage business and industry to utilize alternative products where
available, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-11.2 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area:
Future or expanded handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquids is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is therefore prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A)
The existing or future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid is designated for the purpose of Section 58 in Wellhead Protection Area B, C (WHPA-B, WHPA-C) and therefore requires a Risk Management Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-13.2 |
For existing and future outdoor confinement areas or farm animal yards on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act, and the use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing on all agricultural properties are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plans is required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. These Risk Management Plans shall be based upon the regulatory requirements of a Nutrient Management Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act and incorporate best management practices as appropriate. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-2.2 |
To ensure existing waste disposal sites and storage facilities exempt from Environmental Compliance Approvals under Section 39 of the Environmental Protection Act cease to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-2.4 |
For future waste disposal sites and storage facilities exempt from Environmental Compliance Approvals under Section 39 of the Environmental Protection Act within vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore are prohibited to ensure these activities never become a significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-3.1 |
To reduce the risk to drinking water from any existing and future on-site sewage system with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Town of Milton shall implement the mandatory on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program as required under the Building Code Act to ensure this activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-4.1 |
To ensure the application and storage of Agricultural Source Material (ASM) ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, for activities not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, where these activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat;
Existing and future activities within Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A) are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore prohibited.
Existing and future activities within Wellhead Protection Area B (WHPA-B) with a vulnerability score of 10 are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 therefore a Risk Management Plan will be required. These Risk Management Plans shall be based upon the regulatory requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act and scoped to address these specific threats. Contingency plans as required for Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies must contain notification requirements to report a leak or spill from an agricultural source material storage facility.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-5.2 |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material would be a significant drinking water threat, these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A) to ensure these activities never become a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-6.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat for properties not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-CW-7.1 |
To ensure the application of pesticide and the handling and storage of pesticide ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, these activities are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan is required in the following areas:
Existing activities in Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A) with a vulnerability score of 10; and
Existing and Future activities in Wellhead Protection Area B (WHPA-B) with a vulnerability score of 10.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-1.4 |
Halton Region and the Town of Milton shall amend their Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws to:
- Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies;
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-10.2 |
In consideration of any future Planning Act application for the handling and storage of fuel within vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the future handling and storage of fuel in conjunction with a future or expanded retail gas station and future or expanded bulk fuel storage facility excluding bulk fuel storage associated with a municipal emergency generator facility is not permitted within a Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A), to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-11.3 |
In consideration of any future Planning Act application where the land uses associated with the future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquid and/or organic solvents would be a significant drinking water threat under the Clean Water Act, 2006 is prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A) to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-13.1 |
For existing and future outdoor confinement areas or farm animal yards phased in under the Nutrient Management Act located within a vulnerable area where these activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure all Nutrient Management Strategies completed under the Nutrient Management Act include terms and conditions that, when implemented, the activity ceases to be and/ or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-2.1 |
For existing waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act within vulnerable areas where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and revise, if necessary, all existing Environmental Compliance Approvals to include terms and conditions that, when implemented, will ensure this activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-2.3 |
For future waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act within vulnerable areas where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit the activities within the Environmental Compliance Approval process to ensure these activities never become a significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-3.2 |
For existing or future on-site sewage system with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals required for these septic systems are prepared to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure this activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
This may include, as appropriate, mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that the quality of sources of drinking water is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years, if necessary.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-3.3 |
To ensure existing and future sewage system or sewage works- sanitary sewers and related pipes, storm water management facilities, storage of sewage and sewage treatment plant effluent discharges cease to be and/or never become significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals include terms and conditions (such as regular maintenance) that, when implemented, will manage the risks to drinking water sources associated with these activities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-4.2 |
To ensure the application and storage of Agricultural Source Material (ASM) ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, for activities phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that Nutrient Management Strategies and Plans are:
Prohibited for existing and future activities in Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A) with a vulnerability score of 10; and
Managed for existing and future activities in Wellhead Protection Area B (WHPA-B) with a vulnerability score of 10. Nutrient Management Strategies and Plans must be inclusive of measures to protect drinking water sources. Contingency plans required for Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies must contain notification requirements to report a leak or spill from an agricultural source material storage facility.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-5.1 |
To ensure the application, or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and/or the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall:
a. Prohibit Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plans for existing and future activities in Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A) with a vulnerability score of 10; and
b. Review and, if necessary, amend any Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan to ensure terms and conditions are included that reduce the risk to drinking water sources for the following area for existing and future activities in Wellhead Protection Area B (WHPA-B) with a vulnerability score of 10.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-6.2 |
To ensure the existing and future application, handling and storage of commercial fertilizer ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, for properties phased in under the Nutrient Management Act where such an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that Nutrient Management Plans and/or Strategies are inclusive of measures to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-7.2 |
Where the future handling and storage of pesticides would be a significant drinking water threat the activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are therefore prohibited within a Wellhead Protection Area A (WHPA-A) to ensure they never become a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-8.1 |
The Region of Halton and the Town of Milton shall amend their Official Plans to prohibit future salt storage and handling facilities with a capacity greater than 5,000 tonnes of road salt where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-MC-9.1 |
The Region of Halton and Town of Milton shall include policies in their Official Plan requiring all future development to be designed and maintained based on best management practices regarding snow storage including the provision of designated snow storage areas and the management of associated melt water to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-NB-1.14 |
To ensure the protection of drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes, Halton Region and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks are encouraged to incorporate the Wellhead Protection Area mapping into their Emergency Response Plan and Spills Action Centre mapping, respectively.
The mapping should be included in both the Emergency Response Plan and Spill Action Centre resource mapping within two (2) years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-NB-1.15 |
To protect municipal water supplies from increased vulnerability due to transport pathways, the following policies apply:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide ongoing funding for incentive programs focused on facilitating the proper decommissioning of wells in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903.
b. Halton Region is requested to incorporate conditions of approval for Planning Act and Condominium Act applications to ensure private wells that are no longer in use are decommissioned in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903.
c. Halton Region is requested to ensure best management practices are utilized to protect the quantity and quality of groundwater sources during the installation of future municipal infrastructure.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-NB-1.7 |
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks and other Provincial Ministries shall consider providing funding for incentive programs, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program, to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HR-NB-12.1 |
Where the future runoff containing de-icing chemicals would be a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area, the airport authority, in their consideration of any future airport facilities, is encouraged to include appropriate design standards and best management practices to prevent the runoff from airport de-icing facilities from becoming a significant drinking water threat.
The Town of Milton shall report to the Source Protection Authority if an application has been made for a future airport facility within the vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat by February 1st of each year. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-NB-14.1 |
To ensure the conveyance of oil by way of the establishment and operation of liquid hydrocarbon pipelines within the meaning of O.Reg 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, within vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Canada Energy Regulator, Ontario Energy Board and the pipeline proponent are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority the location of any future proposed oil pipelines within the Source Protection Area.
The Source Protection Authority shall document in the annual report the number of future oil pipelines proposed within vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
HR-NB-7.3 |
Where the application, handling and storage of pesticide is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks should develop education, training and outreach programs promoting integrated pest management and alternative pest control best management practices, particularly for agricultural properties, golf courses and sports fields where these activities are significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
HVAs, SGRAs, Wells - 1(E&O) |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority will initiate and lead Education and Outreach, when the Source Protection Plan takes effect, directed to
all landowners and residents with private wells in HVAs, SGRAs and other rural areas, to promote best management practices to help address
various potential threats to groundwater sources of drinking water, raise awareness of drinking water threats, and provide education on the
vulnerability of HVAs, SGRAs and abandoned or poorly maintained wells as transport pathways of contamination to sources of groundwater.
Implementation will be conditional on availability of funding. The E & O will be targeted for implementation within three to five years of the Plan
taking effect, and will continue as needed based on a review at that time.
The above applies to the existing and future, moderate and low, various threats (listed below) in all HVAs and SGRAs and rural areas with private wells in the Essex Region Source Protection Area:
The handling and storage of road salt
The storage of snow
The handling and storage of fuel
Waste disposal sites
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects,
stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage
The handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid
The handling and storage of an organic solvent
The application of pesticide to land
The handling and storage of pesticide
The application of commercial fertilizer to land
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
The application of agricultural source material to land
The storage of agricultural source material
The management of agricultural source material
The application of non-agricultural source material to land
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material |
Essex |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
I-2 |
The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the
actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies
and make that report available to the Lower Trent Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of any E. coli monitoring data for raw and treated water that relate to
the Stirling drinking water system collected during the preceding calendar year;
and
b) A summary of any actions taken at the water treatment plant to address the
presence of E.coli in the drinking water. |
Lower Trent |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ICA1 |
Where the threat from the following activities could be significant in the areas delineated as the Callander Issue Contributing Area, an education and outreach program shall be implemented to address:
The application of agricultural source material
The storage of agricultural source material
The application of non-agricultural source material
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
The application of commercial fertilizer
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard. O. Reg. 385/08, s. 3.
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage.
The Municipalities shall plan and deliver an education and outreach program designed to result in persons engaged in the above activities and other residents and/or property owners taking the necessary actions to prevent and reduce phosphorus contributions to waterways in the following ways:
1. Identifying sources of phosphorus on the property;
2. Engaging in best management practices for reducing the erosion of stream banks, which should include consideration of vegetated buffers or naturalized shoreline areas which may be implemented independent of local Site Plan Control by-laws;
3. Engaging in best management practices for sediment removal, removal of soil-bound nutrients and soluble nutrients from overland and shallow subsurface flow;
4. Engaging in best management practices for the application of agricultural source material, commercial fertilizer, and non-agricultural source material;
5. Engaging in best management practices for management or handling of agricultural source material generated by grazing, pasturing, maintaining in yards or confining farm animals;
6. Engaging in best management practices for the storage of agricultural and non-agricultural source material and commercial fertilizer;
7. Establishing a vegetated buffer strip on the property; and
8. Fostering the improvement of aquatic habitats.
The education and outreach program should be delivered consistently throughout the five municipalities within the Issue Contributing Area within two years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect and shall be updated as necessary and made available on an ongoing basis.
The education and outreach program shall identify the desired actions and/or behaviours, as well as the goals, timeline, deliverables, and desired outcomes of the program; and include a process for measuring the outcomes. The program plan shall identify the benefits of engaging in the desired behaviors, as well as the barriers, and incorporate a variety of strategies and tools to overcome the barriers. The program shall take into consideration the principles of social marketing as a strategy for fostering the desired behaviours and actions. In the Townships of Ballantyne, Bolter and Wilkes (which lack municipal organization), the Conservation Authority shall collaborate with ICA municipalities to implement this policy. Additionally the policy may be more broadly released to a whole Municipality or any part of the Source Protection Area, at the discretion of a municipal council. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ICA2 |
In the Callander Issue Contributing Area, where the threat could be significant, the following existing and future activities are designated for the purpose of specifying certain conditions to be placed on a Nutrient Management Act instrument:
The application of agricultural source material
The storage of agricultural source material
The application of non-agricultural source material
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
The application of commercial fertilizer
The use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard.
Where the threat from any of the activities listed above would be significant and a Nutrient Management Plan, Nutrient Management Strategy, and/or Non-Agricultural
Source Materials Plan is required, the instrument should include appropriate terms and conditions that demonstrate that best management practices
related to limiting and/or attenuating phosphorus have been implemented in the plan or strategy to meet the objectives of the Source Protection Plan (SP
Plan). All existing instruments shall be updated within two years of the date the SP Plan takes effect to
demonstrate that best management practices related to limiting and/or attenuating phosphorus have been implemented in the plan or strategy to meet
the objectives of the SP Plan. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
ICA3 |
The North Bay-Mattawa Conservation Authority, in partnership with the Municipality of Callander and in consultation with the other named municipalities, shall establish a working committee within one year of the date the Source Protection Plan (SP Plan) takes effect. This working committee will prioritize research regarding threat activities in the Callander Issue Contributing Area to accomplish the following research outcomes:
1. verify relative contributions
of phosphorus from specific activities and in relation to subzones within the
Issue Contributing Area;
2. improve understanding of
attenuation mechanisms and their relative significance;
3. target areas of concern for
future work using data gathered in the monitoring of the issue and other
available watershed research; and
4. identify best management
practices that could be implemented to meet the objectives of the SP Plan.
The following activities shall be researched to improve knowledge and understanding of the pertinent factors related to phosphorus loading, attenuation and water quality as they were identified in the North Bay-Mattawa Source Protection Area Assessment Report:
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act.
The application of agricultural
source material
The storage of agricultural
source material
The application of non-agricultural
source material
The handling and storage of
non-agricultural source material
The application of commercial
fertilizer to land.
The handling and storage of
commercial fertilizer
The use of land as livestock
grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard.
O.Reg. 385/08, s. 3.
The establishment, operation or
maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of
sewage.
In addition to the Municipality of Callander, the following municipalities having jurisdiction over lands in the Issue Contributing Area shall be included in the working committee in an advisory capacity: Chisholm Township, Municipality of East Ferris, City of North Bay, and the Municipality of Powassan. Responsibility for implementation of this policy shall rest with the Municipality of Callander. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ICA4 |
When the Source Protection Plan (SP Plan) comes into effect, the North Bay-Mattawa Conservation Authority, with the support of the Municipality of Callander, shall undertake an ongoing program of water quality monitoring annually in the Callander Issue Contributing Area. At a minimum, the program should monitor phosphorus or a surrogate, and may also monitor conditions that can either contribute to the development of blue green algae or to the attenuation of phosphorus. Annual reporting shall focus on reporting trends in the subwatersheds, and shall give consideration to the potential relationships between phosphorus loading and the policies that have been implemented under the SP Plan. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
INCENT-1 |
The MOE is encouraged to undertake a review of the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program funding program and include expansions to the program to address vulnerable areas where significant drinking water threats are present. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
INCENT-2 |
If stewardship program funding is extended, local source protection authorities should implement risk reduction projects through the stewardship program in vulnerable areas where significant drinking water threats are present. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
INCENT-3 |
Municipalities are encouraged to consider incentives that can be offered to landowners to improve the use and care of septic systems where this activity is a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
INCENT-4 |
Municipalities are required to consider opportunities that could be made available to promote the effective storage of snow, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
INCENT-5 |
To address significant drinking water threats related to agricultural activities (application, handling and storage of agricultural source material, pesticides and fertilizers), the OSCIA is encouraged to prioritize the Environmental Farm Plan monies for use within vulnerable areas where significant drinking water threats are present. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
INCENT-6 |
The MOE is requested to continue its funding to municipalities and source protection authorities under source protection programs to continue local research into issues (nitrogen, pathogen, sodium, chloride, TCE) to determine where the following activities are a contributing source of the contaminant in the Issues contributing areas:
a) Application and storage of ASM;
b) Application, handling and storage of NASM;
c) Use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard. O. Reg. 385/08, s. 3;
d) Application, handling and storage of fertilizer;
e) Septic systems governed under the Building Code Act and the Ontario Water Resources Act;
f) Discharge of untreated stormwater from a stormwater retention pond;
g) Handling and storage of road salt; and
h) Handling and storage of DNAPLs. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
KCSPA-CW-1.1 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the effective date set by the Minister.
- For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
- For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
- For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding Restricted Land Uses shall take effect the same day the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
Where the Source Protection Policies require the Municipality of Central Elgin to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Municipality of Central Elgin, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
For Section 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect; and
For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws within the Municipality of Central Elgin, Malahide Township, the Municipality of Thames Centre and County of Elgin must be amended to conform with the significant threat policies and adopted by municipal council within five (5) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect or at the time of the next Official Plan and Zoning By-Law conformity exercise as per Section 26 of the Planning Act.
|
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-CW-1.16 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean
Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and
Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or
Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be
interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as
well as any subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof.
This provision is also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or
guideline issued by the Province or the municipality. No provision of this
Plan shall derogate from any applicable law. |
Kettle Creek |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-CW-1.2 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Section 57 or Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
|
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-CW-1.4 |
The Municipality of Central Elgin may develop and implement stewardship,
education and outreach programs directed at any, or all, significant drinking water
threat activities prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006, where such
programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Municipality of
Central Elgin and subject to available funding. Such programs may include, but
not necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of drinking
water threats and promotion of best management practices within the vulnerable
areas identified in the Assessment Report. |
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-CW-1.5 |
The Municipality of Central Elgin, in collaboration with other implementing bodies
and levels of government where desirable, may develop and implement incentive
programs directed at significant drinking water threat activities prescribed under
the Clean Water Act, 2006, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or
appropriate and subject to available funding. |
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-MC-1.3 |
The Municipality of Central Elgin, Malahide Township and the Municipality of Thames Centre shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws to:
a. Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
b. Indicate that within the areas identified, any land use or significant drinking water threat activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking
water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise
regulated by those policies; and
c. Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan. |
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-NB-1.13 |
In accordance with Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities, should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPA) and Intake Protection Zones (IPZ). The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within the Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of ten (10).
Municipalities will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the Source Protection Authority. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of ten (10).
The above policies will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan within each Source Protection Area. These policies, in conjunction with additional education and outreach policies, should be implemented within two (2) years after the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. |
Kettle Creek |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-NB-1.14 |
The Ministry of the Environment Spills Action Centre should review and update, if necessary, all emergency response information and procedures to reflect the Well Head Protection Area (WHPA) or Intake Protection Zone (IPZ) mapping in the Kettle Creek Source Protection Area to ensure that drinking water sources will be protected in the event of a spill. |
Kettle Creek |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-NB-1.15 |
The Municipality of Central Elgin, Municipality of Thames Centre and Township of
Malahide should review and update, if necessary, their Emergency Management
Plans to include the following for the Belmont Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA)
A, B, and C and Elgin Area Primary Water Supply Intake Protection Zone (IPZ) 1
and 2 and 3 as presented in the Assessment Report:
a. Maps to show the location of the Belmont Wellhead Protection Area and
Elgin Area Primary Water Supply Intake Protection Zones, as applicable.
b. Requirements to contain firefighting run off to prevent chemicals from
entering the groundwater or surface water that are used to suppress
fires.
c. Reponses to spills from septic haulage, highway accidents and railway
derailments. |
Kettle Creek |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
KCSPA-NB-1.6 |
The Ministry of the Environment should continue to provide funding and support to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, under the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program. |
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
L-1 |
Policy L-1: Applicable Area: Lakefield and Peterborough
Applicable Activities: Maintaining open areas of mown grass for recreational activities that promote the congregation of waterfowl within or near surface water bodies is an existing significant drinking water threat or would be a future significant drinking water threat.
L-1(1): Develop a waterfowl management plan to reduce the presence of waterfowl on properties owned by the municipality. The plan must follow an adaptive approach to waterfowl management that includes habitat modification and ongoing monitoring of the plan's effectiveness. The plan may include, but is not limited to site alterations to reduce the attractiveness of the property to waterfowl, such as planting of shoreline vegetation, and installation of physical barriers.
L-1(2): Within one year, post signage at any areas frequently used by the public to feed waterfowl. The signs will indicate that the feeding of waterfowl is prohibited because it can have a
negative impact on water quality.
L-1(3): Establish a bylaw to prohibit the feeding of waterfowl at municipally owned parks and mown areas. This bylaw must be established within one year.
L-1(4): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the Otonabee-Peterborough Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of the activities undertaken as part of the waterfowl management plan and the results of any related monitoring activities. |
Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
L-1-S-a |
Where the conveyance of oil in pipelines across open water bodies is an existing significant threat to lake-based drinking water sources,
a. fuel pipeline owners are recommended to conduct inline pipeline integrity testing and visual inspections of pipeline crossings at an open water body every three years.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
L-2 |
L-2(1): Review their relevant emergency response plans or procedures within one year to
ensure that they are adequate to respond to a pipeline rupture in an area where the
pipeline crosses a body of open water. The emergency response plan must include,
at a minimum:
a) Specific procedures for responding to a pipeline rupture in an area where
the pipeline crosses a body of open water;
b) A communications protocol;
c) The location of available spill response materials; and
d) Provisions to immediately notify the affected water treatment plant and
municipality in the event of a pipeline rupture.
L-2(2): Review and update the emergency response plans annually.
L-2(3): Conduct annual practice exercises and/or emergency response scenarios related to
the emergency response plan in areas along the length of the pipeline.
L-2(4): Request and report on information from the Owner of the Pipeline by February 1
regarding any updates to existing emergency response plans made to address a
pipeline rupture for the preceding calendar year. This report is also to be provided
to relevant municipalities.
L-2(5): Request and report on information from the Owner of the Pipeline by February 1
regarding any activation of the emergency response plan for activities undertaken as
a result of a pipeline rupture for the preceding calendar year. This report is also to
be provided to relevant municipalities.
L-2(6): Notify the potentially affected municipality and water treatment plant prior to any pipeline
maintenance activities.
L-2(7): Request and report on information from the Owner of the Pipeline by February 1 on all
emergency response practice exercises and maintenance activities completed in the
preceding calendar year. This report is also to be provided to relevant municipalities.
L-2(8): Review their relevant water treatment plant emergency response plans or procedures
within one year to ensure that they are adequate to respond to a pipeline rupture in an
area where the pipeline crosses a body of open water. The emergency response plan must
include, at a minimum:
a) Specific procedures at the related water treatment plant for responding to a
pipeline rupture in an area where the pipeline crosses a body of open water;
b) A communications protocol;
c) The location of spill response materials available to the related water treatment
plant; and
d) Any other relevant information.
L-2(9): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions
it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies for the
preceding calendar year and make that report available to the Ganaraska Region Source
Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of any updates to existing emergency response plans made to address
a pipeline rupture.
L-2(10): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions
it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies for the
preceding calendar year and make that report available to the Ganaraska Region Source
Protection Authority.
L-2(11): Review and update the emergency response plans annually.
L-2(12): Provide mapping of the areas where a pipeline crosses a body of open water to the Spills Action Centre to assist in spill response.
L-2(13): The ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it
has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies for the preceding
calendar year and make that report available to the Ganaraska Region Source Protection
Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of the actions taken to implement policy L-2(12).
|
Ganaraska Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
L-2-S-a |
To reduce the risks to drinking water sources from the construction of pipelines conveying oil across open water bodies,
a. the National Energy Board and the Ontario Energy Board in their consideration of any oil pipeline application where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat are requested to ensure that the applicant has complied with or included appropriate design standards, monitoring, and maintenance practices that when implemented will prevent a pipeline from becoming a significant drinking water threat.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
L1-livgraz-1 (E & O) |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority will initiate and lead Education and Outreach when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. The Conservation Authority will inform the Town of Lakeshore, and any subsequent owners of the subject property, that agricultural livestock operations would be a significant threat to sources of drinking water in this IPZ-1, and will contact the Town, and any subsequent owners, on an annual basis to determine if there are any proposed changes to the land use and/or ownership.
The above applies to future significant threat of the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor containment area or farm animal yard, in the vulnerable areas:
Lakeshore IPZ-1.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LAU1 |
An education and outreach program shall be delivered by the Village of South River to property owners in the Laurier Township portion of the South River IPZ-1 to create awareness of the threat that may be posed and encourage responsible action if engaging in any of the following activities:
The application of agricultural source material to land.
The storage of agricultural source material.
The application of non-agricultural source material to land.
The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material.
The application of commercial fertilizer to land.
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer.
The application of pesticide to land.
The handling and storage of pesticide.
The handling and storage of road salt.
The storage of snow.
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard. O. Reg.
385/08, s. 3.
The storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste
The program shall be delivered within one year of the effective date of the plan and continue to be available. Should the area in question come under the jurisdiction of an organized Municipality,
the responsibilities for implementation of this policy shall be transferred to that Municipality. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LE-microcystinLR-1 |
In accordance with Section 22(2)-[7] of the Clean Water Act, further monitoring and research of microcystin-LR and phosphorus is required for the Lake Erie drinking water intakes (Wheatley, Union, Harrow-Colchester and Pelee Island) and tributaries.
The Harrow-Colchester South Water Treatment Plant, Union Water Supply System, Pelee Island West Shore Water Treatment Plant and Wheatley Water Treatment Plant shall continue to conduct existing water quality sampling (both raw and treated water) and to share information and data with other interested parties.
Essex Region Conservation Authority, in collaboration with the Province (Ministry of Environment), and other bodies (e.g. Lower Thames Valley Conservation Authority, Environment Canada, research institutions) where possible, should continue the support of existing water quality monitoring programs (e.g. DWSP, PWQMN and research projects) where they relate to the assessment and understanding of microcystin-LR as a drinking water issue and/or phosphorus as a contributor to algal growth. Where it is appropriate, additional water quality monitoring should be incorporated into existing programs or developed as new programs. These monitoring efforts should be directed at such things as, but not limited to:
- event based water quality monitoring (both blooms and runoff events),
- correlation between the various monitoring programs (locally and within Lake Erie)
- contributions through transport pathways, including but not limited to agricultural non-point sources, septic systems, water treatment plants, combined sewer overflows and residential sources such as lawns
Participation in these monitoring programs is dependent on adequate resources (including funding and staff capacity) being available. |
Essex |
Non-specific |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
LIV-1 |
Where the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land (with an animal density >1 Nutrient Unit per acre) is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
2) The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-A in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens with an animal density >1 Nutrient Unit per acre (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-4: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act as prohibited, shall be prohibited by the Risk Management Official within 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect as per s. 57(2) under the Clean Water Act, unless otherwise specified within the policy.
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
LIV-2 |
1) The use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) Where the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard is in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
LIV-3 |
For lands that do not require a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy, where the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The use of land for an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where it would be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) The use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
LIVE-1-LB-PI-MC |
Where the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard (existing and/or future) that is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B is governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Nutrient Management Strategy developed under General Regulation 267/03 of the Nutrient Management Act), this activity shall continue to be managed through these existing requirements. The existing regulatory requirements administered by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and the corresponding compliance program enforced by the MOE already manage this activity so that it is not a significant threat to drinking water. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
LIVE-2-LB-S58 |
The existing or future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is or would be significant as described in Appendix B. The Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. This policy does not apply to:
- Small, non-intensive farms where the number of farm animals is not sufficient to generate five or more nutrient units of manure annually and the concentration is less than one nutrient unit per acre of cropland
- Activities that are governed by Nutrient Management Strategies developed under the Nutrient Management Act. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
LO-FUEL-1 |
Where event based modelling of a spill from a petroleum tank farm has shown that it would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks will work with applicable regulating authorities (e.g., Ministry of Government and Consumer Services and Technical Standards and Safety Authority) to ensure consideration is given to the following actions related to spill prevention contingency measures:
a) investigate and evaluate existing Spills Prevention Plans/Spill Contingency Plans;
b) recommend additional measures to reduce the likelihood that a spill from a storage facility would impair drinking water source quality;
c) incorporate all applicable provisions of Ontario Regulations 213/01 and 217/01 and their codes as well as other measures to ensure the protection of drinking water sources into a Risk Management Plan for the facility, which may include but not be limited to:
i. best management practices
ii. site characterization as necessary
iii. proof of ability to pay for clean-up of potential contamination
iv. the appropriate frequency of inspections
d) review existing Environmental Compliance Approvals for discharges to surface water at the identified sites to determine if there are adequate safeguards to protect drinking water sources;
e) determine if additional works or procedures are required to reduce the likelihood of contaminants discharging to Lake Ontario in the event of a spill or equipment failure/malfunction;
f) ensure provisions for spill notification protocols are established jointly with Spills Action Centre to ensure direct notification to all potentially affected water treatment plant operators and appropriate communication to the public and media;
g) establish notification protocols for significant threat activities to ensure that water plant operators are notified appropriately for a given magnitude of spill;
h) ensure that information is communicated to all (e.g., the originators of the spill, emergency response/clean-up personnel, medical officer of health, municipal water owner and water operating authority) responsible parties who are responding to the spill; and
i) include a provision that the facility owner work with the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management to ensure that testing of the Contingency Plan is carried out within 3 years of the Source Protection Plan coming into effect, followed by regular (frequency and priority to be determined in consultation) emergency response preparedness exercises to address the significant threats identified.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LO-FUEL-2 |
Where event based modelling has identified activities that are significant drinking water threats or where the Tables of Drinking Water Threats (Ontario Regulation 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006) identifies moderate or low drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall, in consultation with appropriate authorities, work with the facility owner to:
a) support the investigation and evaluation of existing Spills Prevention Plans/ Spill Contingency Plans; and
b) identify the need for potential additional design and operational best management practices which would reduce the likelihood that a spill from a storage facility would impair drinking water source quality for tanks located on federal lands.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LO-G-1 |
To protect drinking water sources from potential spills along highways, shipping lanes and railways, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall:
a) in consultation with the Spills Action Centre and other appropriate bodies, update notification protocols for spills to ensure direct notification of all potentially affected water treatment plant operators and appropriate communication to the public and media;
b) in consultation with the Spills Action Centre and the affected municipalities, review the notification protocol for significant threat activities and adjust the protocols as required to ensure that water plant operators are notified appropriately for a given magnitude of spill;
c) ensure that information is communicated to all responsible parties (e.g., the originators of the spill, emergency response/clean-up personnel, medical officer of health, municipal water system owner and water system operating authority) who are responding to the spill;
d) in consultation with the owners and operators of municipal drinking water systems, require that a Contingency Plan is developed, reviewed and/or updated under the Drinking Water Quality Management Standard to ensure that significant drinking water threats identified in the Assessment Report are included and amend the municipal drinking water license, as required;
e) in consultation with the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management and other appropriate bodies, ensure that testing of the Contingency Plan is carried out within 3 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, followed by regular (frequency and priority to be determined in consultation) emergency response preparedness exercises to address the significant threats identified; and
f) in consultation with appropriate bodies, promote spill prevention and share information about source protection with the public.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LO-G-2 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks will work in partnership with Environment Canada and municipalities responsible for providing water from systems with intakes in the western basin of Lake Ontario to establish and chair a Lake Ontario Collaborative Group (LOCG) focused on the western basin to undertake actions to support the implementation of policies to protect this source of drinking water.
Within one year of this plan coming into effect the LOCG should develop and approve Terms of Reference. The Terms of Reference should include but not be limited to defining roles, tasks, and responsibilities of the LOCG partners with respect to:
1) Sharing information about Lake Ontario circulation and water quality monitoring, and where technically feasible:
a) install permanent instrumentation (e.g., continuous recording current meters, with wireless telephone link to MECP Environment Monitoring and Reporting Branch and the LOCG members) to provide real-time monitoring of current speed, direction and temperature throughout the water column for use with a 3-D Hydrodynamic Circulation Model for future forecasting of spills impact assessments and assessing spill prevention strategies;
b) ensure that the real-time data are available to municipalities and conservation authorities; and
c) undertake annual Lake Ontario nearshore water quality monitoring, and make the data available to municipalities and conservation authorities;
2) Maintaining and further developing a 3-D Hydrodynamic Circulation Model or more advanced models as appropriate, with particular focus to the nearshore of Lake Ontario to assess activities to determine their potential to be significant drinking water threats, including:
a) maintaining specialized modelling expertise to undertake spills scenario modelling; and
b) leading the development of typical lake circulation spill base cases to provide tools for quick assessments of spills, in real time, to provide early warning for emergency response and remedial action, including determining the parties to be notified in the event of a spill;
3) Using the model as a consistent approach to assess potential drinking water threats from:
a) other existing activities which might be a drinking water threat to one or more municipal drinking water system;
b) assessing newly proposed activities which may pose a threat to one or more municipal drinking water systems at the proposal stage; and
c) assessing impacts of climate change;
4) In the event of a spill use the model to assess and respond to potential water quality impacts at municipal water treatment plant intakes;
5) Sharing environmental monitoring data and using modelling to inform research on topics such as, but not limited to:
a) the effectiveness of risk management measures and spill contingency measures;
b) cumulative impacts of point and non-point sources of contaminants on near shore water quality; and
c) the effectiveness of source protection plan policies in reducing the risk related to pathogens (not limited to E. coli), including identifying the pathogens and the respective densities at different times; assessing the associated risk at intakes due to pathogens in non-disinfected wastewater and other known specific sources of these pathogens; and undertaking quantitative microbial risk assessments, using a structured research and development design (such as based on the protocols established by the US EPA) to assess the threat and adequacy of existing treatment on a plant-by-plant basis.
Timeline: See policy |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LO-G-3 |
The municipalities of Peel, Toronto and Durham shall participate as members of the Lake Ontario Collaborative Group (LOCG) and shall undertake tasks (including funding portions) as agreed to in the Terms of Reference established by the LOCG.
Timeline: See policy |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LO-G-4 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to establish an outreach program to discuss the findings and policies arising from the source water protection program with the National Energy Board, Ontario Energy Board, Environment Canada, Health Canada, New York State and US government agencies in order to:
a) encourage collaboration on protecting our shared drinking water sources; and
b) raise profile of the importance of Lake Ontario as a source of drinking water for Ontario.
Timelines:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LO-NGS-1 |
Where event based modelling has shown that a spill from a nuclear generating station would cause the storage and/or use of tritium contaminated heavy water to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should, in consultation with the appropriate authorities:
a) update spill notification protocols jointly with Spills Action Centre to ensure direct notification to all potentially affected water treatment plant operators and appropriate communication to the public and media;
b) review the reporting thresholds jointly with affected municipalities, including consideration to lowering of the spill notification threshold to municipalities for significant threat activities and adjust the reporting threshold as required;
c) ensure that information is communicated to all responsible parties (e.g., the originators of the spill, emergency response/clean-up personnel, medical officer of health, municipal water owner and water operating authority) who are responding to the spill;
d) investigate and evaluate existing Risk Mitigation Plan/Risk Reduction Plan/Risk Contingency Plans make modifications where necessary with priority on reducing the likelihood of spills (such as potential additional design and operational best management practices and operational procedures), which would impair drinking water sources; and
e) work with the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management to ensure that testing of the Risk Mitigation/Risk Reduction/Risk Contingency Plan is carried out within 3 years of the Source Protection Plan coming into effect, followed by regular (frequency and priority to be determined in consultation) emergency response preparedness exercises to address the significant threats identified.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LO-PIPE-1 |
Where event based modelling has shown that a spill from a petroleum pipeline system reaching a tributary would be a significant drinking water threat , the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should work with facility owners and provincial and federal regulators to develop, review and recommend necessary improvements to existing spill prevention, spill management, risk reduction, and contingency plans to ensure the following:
a) plans are based on the depth of ground cover at surface water crossings;
b) spill response time frames are established;
c) responsibilities of first responders are established to ensure a prompt unified regulatory command structure to manage the spill response;
d) notification protocols are established jointly with the Spills Action Centre to ensure direct notification to all potentially affected water treatment plant operators and appropriate communication to the public and media;
e) notification protocols are established for significant threat activities to ensure the water plant operators are notified appropriately for a given magnitude of spill;
f) that information is communicated to all responsible parties (e.g., the originators of the spill, emergency response/clean-up personnel, medical officer of health, municipal water owner and water operating authority) who are responding to the spill;
g) that there are appropriate spills response plans for each crossing;
h) that appropriate pipeline system failure and shut down measures and policies are included;
i) a review is undertaken on the depth of ground cover over the pipeline at each crossing, including an assessment of erosion and flood risk;
j) that the facility owner provides assurance concerning the integrity of their infrastructure to prevent spills where these could be a significant drinking water threat;
k) that a report on the inspection of the pipeline crossings at each tributary is provided to the Source Protection Authority;
l) that the pipeline design and operational best management practices are in place (including potential additional design and operational best management practices);
m) that any new or expansions or pipeline replacements are constructed to meet current best design criteria; and
n) a provision is included in the contingency plan that the facility owner work with the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management to ensure that testing of the contingency plan is carried out within 3 years of the Source Protection Plan coming into effect, followed by regular (frequency and priority to be determined in consultation) emergency response preparedness exercises to address the significant threats identified.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
LO-SEW-1 |
Where event based modelling has shown that a disinfection interruption at a Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP Diffuser) would cause a sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge to surface water or sewage treatment plant effluent to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should:
a) review and amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure they contain terms and conditions that ensure that the threats cease to be significant. Terms and conditions shall include a spill prevention and contingency plan. Consideration should also be given to the need for a year-round disinfection system and sufficient redundancy in the disinfection system to minimize the length of time that the disinfection system would not be working;
b) update spill notification protocols jointly with Spills Action Centre to ensure direct notification to all potentially affected water treatment plant operators and appropriate communication to the public and media;
c) review the notification protocols for significant threat activities and adjust the reporting protocols as required to ensure the water plant operators are notified appropriately for a given magnitude of spill;
d) ensure that information is communicated to all responsible parties (e.g., the originators of the spill, emergency response/clean-up personnel, medical officer of health, municipal water owner and water operating authority) who are responding to the spill; and
e) work with the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management to ensure that testing of the Contingency Plan is carried out within 3 years of the Source Protection Plan coming into effect, followed by regular (frequency and priority to be determined in consultation) emergency response preparedness exercises to address the significant threats identified.
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
LO-SEW-2 |
Where event based modelling has shown that a spill from a sanitary trunk sewer break would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall:
a) review and amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that the threat ceases to be significant. Terms and conditions should include a spill prevention and contingency plan incorporating a requirement for assessment of erosion and flooding risks in tributaries which could jeopardize the integrity of the sanitary sewer systems identified as a significant threat. Re-inspections shall also be required with the frequency commensurate with the level of risk identified during the initial inspection;
b) update spill notification protocols jointly with Spills Action Centre to ensure direct notification to all potentially affected water treatment plant operators and appropriate communication to the public and media;
c) review the notification protocols for significant threat activities and adjust the reporting protocol as required to ensure that water plant operators are notified appropriately for a given magnitude of spill;
d) ensure that information is communicated to all responsible parties (e.g., the originators of the spill, emergency response/clean-up personnel, medical officer of health, municipal water owner and water operating authority) who are responding to the spill;
e) work with the Office of the Fire Marshal Emergency Management to ensure that testing of the Contingency Plan is carried out within 3 years of the Source Protection Plan coming into effect, followed by regular (frequency and priority to be determined in consultation) emergency response preparedness exercises to address the significant threats identified; and
f) direct the responsible municipality to undertake a review and report on the depth of ground cover over the pipeline at each crossing including an assessment of erosion, flood risk and the integrity of their infrastructure. MECP shall consider this information in determining the risk mitigation measures required to ensure that the drinking water threat ceases to be or does not become significant. The inspection report should be shared with the Source Protection Authority.
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
LO-SEW-3 |
Where a spill from a facility could reach an off-site storm sewer such that it would be a significant drinking water threat, or moderate or low drinking water threat as identified in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should enact the necessary regulation and/or instrument to require such facility owners to be subject to provincial approvals for spill prevention/ mitigation plans.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
LSTOCK-1 |
Existing and future livestock grazing and pasturing is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the number of animals on the land at any time is sufficient to generate nutrients at an annual rate that is greater than 0.5 nutrient units/acre where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
LSTOCK-2 |
Existing and future livestock grazing and pasturing is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the number of animals on the land at any time is sufficient to generate nutrients at an annual rate that is greater than 0.5 nutrient units/acre. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
LSTOCK-3 |
Where the Nutrient Management Act does not require an approval, existing and future outdoor confinement and farm-animal yards is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited within WHPA-A/IPZ-1. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
LSTOCK-4 |
Where existing and future outdoor confinement areas and farm-animal yards are in an area where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat outside of WHPA-A/IPZ-1, and the activity requires an approval under the Nutrient Management Act, OMAFRA shall ensure that the nutrient management plan or strategy that governs the outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
LSTOCK-5 |
Existing and future outdoor confinement areas and farm-animal yards are prohibited within WHPA-A/IPZ-1, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-1 |
Planning Approval Authorities shall amend their planning documents to prohibit future:
1) waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act (excluding storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste (O.Reg 347) and storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste)
2c) large (more than 10, 000 L) on-site sewage systems
4) agricultural source material storage facilities
7) non-agricultural source material storage facilities
9) commercial fertilizer storage facilities
11) pesticide storage facilities
13) road salt storage facilities
14) snow storage facilities
15) fuel storage
16) DNAPL storage
17) organic solvent storage
21) outdoor confinement or farm animal yard in WHPA-A/IPZ-1
in vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-10 |
Where the future taking of water from an aquifer without returning it to the same aquifer would be a significant drinking water threat, Planning Approval Authorities shall only permit new development or site alteration where it has been demonstrated that any increase in water demand beyond the allocated demand is sustainable as determined by the MOE in accordance with the Source Protection Plan and Ontario Water Resources Act. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-11 |
Planning Approval Authorities are encouraged to amend their planning documents to protect significant groundwater recharge areas from incompatible development or site alteration that may reduce the recharge of an aquifer within WHPA-Q2. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-12 |
Planning Approval Authorities shall only permit new major development (excluding single detached residential, barns and non-commercial structures that are accessory to an agricultural operation) in a WHPA-Q2 where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, where it can be demonstrated through the submission of a hydrogeological study that the existing water balance can be maintained through the use of best management practices such as low impact development. Where necessary, implementation and maximization of off-site recharge enhancement within the same WHPA-Q2 to compensate for any predicted loss of recharge from the development. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-13 |
Planning Approval Authorities shall require the use of best management practices such as low impact development to maintain pre-development recharge rates for non-major developments or site alterations in a WHPA-Q2 assigned a moderate risk level, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-14 |
Planning Approval Authorities shall be encouraged to examine municipal water supply servicing constraints when approving settlement area expansions within WHPA-Q2 where an activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-15 |
Planning Approval Authorities shall be encouraged to examine municipal water supply servicing constraints when approving settlement area expansions beyond areas assessed in the Tier 3 assessment, within a WHPA-Q2 where an activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-2 |
To address the application of road salt, vulnerable areas where this threat would be significant shall be subject to site plan control to ensure that, where possible:
1.The extent and location of impervious surfaces such as parking lots, roadways and sidewalks are minimized,
2.Site grading and drainage is designed to reduce ponding, and
3.Run-off is either directed outside of vulnerable areas or to storm sewers. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-3 |
Planning Approval Authorities shall amend their planning documents to ensure the design of new stormwater management facilities reduces the risk of contaminating drinking water, and where possible directs the discharge of stormwater outside of vulnerable areas, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-4 |
Planning Approval Authorities shall amend their planning documents to locate new (private or municipal) sewage system infrastructure, wherever possible, outside of the vulnerable area where it would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-5 |
Planning Approval Authorities are encouraged to include policies in their official plans to address stormwater pond discharges and sanitary sewers and related pipes by requiring master environmental servicing plans (MESPs) as part of a complete application to avoid locating threats associated with development infrastructure in all vulnerable areas. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-6 |
In the area where a future small on-site sewage system would be a significant drinking water threat, new development may be permitted only where the lot size for any proposed development that would include a small on-site sewage treatment system is based on the most current version of MOE's guidelines for individual on-site servicing. Lots of record that exist on the effective date of the source protection plan are exempted. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-7 |
Planning Approval Authorities shall amend their planning documents to prohibit new small on-site sewage systems within WHPA-A of the issue contributing area. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-8 |
In the issues contributing area and outside the WHPA-A, where a future small on-site sewage system would be a significant drinking water threat, new development may be permitted only where the lot size for any proposed development that would include a small on-site sewage treatment system is based on the most current version of MOE's guidelines for individual on-site servicing. Lots of record that exist on the date of approval of the source protection plan are exempted. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
LUP-9 |
Where the future taking of water from an aquifer without returning it to the same aquifer would be a significant drinking water threat, Planning Approval Authorities shall only permit new development or site alteration where it can be demonstrated that any increase in water demand can be demonstrated on a sustainable basis as determined by the MOE in accordance with the Source Protection Plan and Ontario Water Resources Act. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
MAT1 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) shall consider the vulnerability of lands in Mattawa WHPA-C to threats posed from the following activities:
The handling or storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid,
Landfilling (municipal waste) AND landfilling (solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial),
Liquid industrial waste injection into a well,
Storage of sewage (e.g. treatment plant tanks).
Further, MNRF shall consult with the Source Protection Authority when making decisions regarding activities or uses permitted on said lands when the potential for use of DNAPLs or products containing them could reasonably be expected to occur. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
MI1EF-M |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall sample raw water to monitor and trend changes in sodium and phosphorus in the Ramsey Lake Issue Contributing Area (IPZ 1, 2 and 3).
The sampling will occur on a frequency adequate to monitor concentrations with the purpose of tracking changes over time in the water quality parameters (sodium and phosphorus) associated with the drinking water issues (sodium and microcystin LR).
Sodium samples will be collected in May and October of each calendar year. Phosphorus samples will be collected yearly as part of the Spring Phosphorus Sampling Program for Ramsey Lake.
The City of Greater Sudbury shall design and implement the required monitoring program within one year of the source protection plan taking effect.
Monitoring policy M5 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ML1-112713-E-F |
It is recommended that, where an industrial sewage effluent discharge and/or a mine tailings pond (existing and/or future) is in an area where this activity is, or would be, a moderate or low drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the site includes appropriate terms and conditions to manage the threats to drinking water.
Terms and conditions to have regard to could include:
� have regard to this policy when considering the review and approval of new mine tailings impoundments;
� recognize the Highly Vulnerable Aquifers, Significant Groundwater recharge Areas and Intake Protection Zone 2 as vulnerable areas, which will be considered as specific review criteria regarding applications for prescribed Instruments Revision for mine tailings impoundments;
� require mining companies to incorporate the City of Timmins in their emergency response plans notification requirements;
� require mining companies to share spill response plans, site sampling, monitoring and inspection reports with the City of Timmins Emergency Response Coordinator and the Director of Engineering and Public Works; and
� require companies to install emergency spill containment structures, leak detection measures or equipment, or subsurface barriers.
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall �have regard to� this policy whenever it makes a decision on any new Environmental Compliance Approvals under the Environmental Protection Act and when making decisions on amendments to existing Environmental Compliance Approvals that a proponent applies for based on a change to their site or operations. |
Mattagami |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
ML2-112713-E-F |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approvals that governs the processed organic waste and septage disposal sites includes appropriate terms and conditions to manage the threats to drinking water.
Terms and conditions to have regard to could include:
have regard to this policy when considering the review and approval of new processed organic waste and septage disposal sites;
recognize the Highly Vulnerable Aquifers, Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas and Intake Protection Zone 2 as vulnerable areas, which will be considered as specific review criteria regarding applications for Prescribed Instruments Revision for processed organic waste and septage disposal sites;
require waste disposal companies to incorporate the City of Timmins in their emergency response plans notification requirements;
require waste disposal companies to share spill response plans, site sampling, monitoring and inspection reports with the City of Timmins Emergency Response Coordinator and the Director of Engineering and Public Works; and
require waste disposal companies to install emergency spill containment structures, leak detection measures or equipment, or subsurface barriers.
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall "have regard to" this policy whenever it makes a decision on any new Environmental Compliance Approvals under the Environmental Protection Act and when making decisions on amendments to existing Environmental Compliance Approvals that a proponent applies for based on a change to their site or operations. |
Mattagami |
Low, Moderate |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
N-1 |
Applicable Activities: The application, handling, or storage of non-agricultural source material is an existing significant drinking water threat and the activity requires a Prescribed Instrument.
N-1: Review all existing Prescribed Instruments related to these activities to determine if they are adequate to ensure that the associated activities are not significant drinking water threats. If they are deemed to be inadequate for this purpose, they will be amended to include additional conditions that will ensure that the activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. All amendments to Prescribed Instruments required by this policy must be carried out within three years from the date that the Trent Source Protection Plan takes effect or such other date as the applicable Director determines based on a prioritized review of Prescribed Instruments that govern the activity. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
N-2 |
Applicable Activities: The application, handling, or storage of non-agricultural source material would be a future significant drinking water threat.
N-2: The activity is prohibited and designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. This policy does not apply for non-agricultural source material listed as Category 1 non-agricultural source material per the General Regulation (O. Reg. 267/03) made under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
N-3 |
Applicable Activities: The application of non-agricultural source material would be a future significant drinking water threat.
N-1: Where the non-agricultural source material is listed as Category 1 non-agricultural source material per the General Regulation (O. Reg. 267/03) made under the Nutrient Management Act, 2002, the activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NASM(APP)-1 |
Where the Nutrient Management and Environmental Protection Acts do not require an approval, the existing and future application of category 1 non-agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan for areas outside of WHPA-A and IPZ-1 where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, reflect appropriate nutrient management practices, and ensure the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
NASM(App)-2 |
Where the Nutrient Management and Environmental Protection Acts do not require an approval, the existing and future application of category 1 non-agricultural source material to land is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited within WHPA-A and IPZ-1 where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
NASM(App)-3 |
Where the existing application of category 1, 2 and 3 non-agricultural source material to land requires approval under the Nutrient Management Act or Environmental Protection Act, and is in an area where it is a significant drinking water threat, OMAFRA and/or MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval:
1) Prohibits the application of category 1 non-agricultural source material within WHPA-A and IPZ-1, and includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat outside of WHPA-A/IPZ-1.
2) Prohibits the application of category 2 and 3 non-agricultural source material within WHPA-A, WHPA-B and IPZ-1 where the activity is a significant drinking water threat and includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat outside of WHPA-A, WHPA-B and IPZ-1. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
NASM(App)-4 |
The future application of category 2 and 3 non-agricultural source material is prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat.
Where the future application of category 1 non-agricultural source material to land requires an approval under the Nutrient Management Act or Environmental Protection Act, OMAFRA and/or MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval prohibits the application of category 1 non-agricultural source material within WHPA-A and IPZ-1, and includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat outside of WHPA-A and IPZ-1. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future, Future |
1 |
False |
|
NASM(App)-5 |
The MOE and OMAFRA are encouraged to consider continuing research regarding soil limiting factors relevant to non-agricultural source material, and to reflect that research in the management of non-agricultural source material sites located in vulnerable areas where the application of non-agricultural source material to land is a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
NASM(H&S)-1 |
Where the Nutrient Management and Environmental Protection Acts do not require an approval, the existing and future handling and storage of category 1 non-agricultural source material is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and therefore requires a risk management plan for areas outside of WHPA-A and IPZ-1 where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, reflect appropriate nutrient management practices, and ensure the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
NASM(H&S)-2 |
Where the Nutrient Management and Environmental Protection Acts do not require an approval, the existing and future handling and storage of category 1 non-agricultural source material is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited within WHPA-A and IPZ-1 where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
NASM(H&S)-3 |
Where the existing handling and storage of category 1, 2 and 3 non-agricultural source material requires approval under the Nutrient Management Act or Environmental Protection Act and is in an area where it is a significant drinking water threat, OMAFRA and/or MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval:
1) prohibits the handling and storage of category 1 non-agricultural source material within WHPA-A and IPZ-1, and includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat outside of WHPA-A/IPZ-1.
2) prohibits the handling and storage of category 2 and 3 non-agricultural source material within WHPA-A / IPZ-1 where the activity is a significant drinking water threat, and includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat outside of WHPA-A / IPZ-1. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
NASM(H&S)-4 |
The future handling and storage of category 2 and 3 non-agricultural source material is prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat.
Where the future handling and storage of category 1 non-agricultural source material requires an approval under the Nutrient Management Act or Environmental Protection Act, OMAFRA and/or MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval prohibits the handling and storage of category 1 non-agricultural source material within WHPA-A and IPZ-1, and include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat outside of WHPA-A and IPZ-1. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future, Future |
1 |
False |
|
NASM-1 |
Where the application of NASM (Category 1) to land is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The application of NASM (Category 1) to land is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future).
2) The application of NASM (Category 1) to land is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) which is not in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-4: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act as prohibited, shall be prohibited by the Risk Management Official within 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect as per s. 57(2) under the Clean Water Act, unless otherwise specified within the policy.
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NASM-1-LB-PI-MC |
Where the application, handling or storage of non-agricultural source material (existing and/or future) that is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B is governed by a Prescribed Instrument (NASM Plan developed under General Regulation 267/03 of the Nutrient Management Act), this activity shall continue to be managed through these existing requirements. The existing regulatory requirements administered by the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and the corresponding compliance program enforced by the MOE already manage this activity so that it is not a significant threat to drinking water |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NASM-2 |
Where the handling and storage of NASM (Category 1) is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The handling and storage of NASM (Category 1) is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in the following area:
WHPA-A (future).
2) The handling and storage of NASM (Category 1) is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NASM-2-LB-PI-MC |
Where the application, handling or storage of non-agricultural source material (existing and/or future) is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B and is governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval under the Environmental Protection Act) the MOE shall ensure the instrument includes appropriate terms and conditions so that:
a) The application, handling and storage of non-agricultural source material (existing) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; or
b) The application, handling and storage of non-agricultural source material (future) never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The MOE shall comply with part (a) of this policy within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note that if the material is untreated septage, the future application is prohibited through policies WASTE-3-LB-PI/PA-MC and WASTE-4-LB-S57. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NASM-3 |
1) The application of NASM (Category 2 and 3) to land shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) The application of NASM to land (existing) may continue only until the expiry of the current approval, after which time it would be considered as a future activity.
Timelines:
T-2: Prescribed Instruments (existing), where prohibited, shall not be renewed when the current Prescribed Instrument expires, and the significant threat activity to which the Prescribed Instrument pertains, shall cease no later than 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NASM-3-LB-S58 |
The existing and future land application, handling or storage of non-agricultural source material is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is or would be significant as described in Appendix B. The Risk Management Plans for existing activities shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. This policy does not apply to:
Activities that are governed by an existing Certificate of Approval issued under the Environmental Protection Act
Activities that are governed by a NASM Plan developed under the Nutrient Management Act |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NASM-4 |
The handling and storage of NASM (Category 2 and 3) shall be prohibited where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-2: Prescribed Instruments (existing), where prohibited, shall not be renewed when the current Prescribed Instrument expires, and the significant threat activity to which the Prescribed Instrument pertains, shall cease no later than 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NASM-5 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affars are requested to provide to landowners and haulers that have a Prescribed Instrument or Risk Management Plan to haul, store or apply NASM, information on the importance of protecting source water and the location of the nearby municipal wells where the application, handling and storage of NASM is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 policies regarding restricted land uses shall come into effect the same day the relevant policies within Source Protection Plan comes into effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the County and/or the Conservation Authority to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect.
e. For Section 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan or amendment comes into effect;
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the Official Plan must be amended and adopted by Council to conform with the significant threat policies within five (5) years from the date of the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan comes into effect or the next Official Plan review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and the Zoning By-law within three (3) years from the adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-1.18 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats and Circumstances (swpip.ca), Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any
subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the County. |
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-1.2 |
Despite the definition of existing, for the purposes of this Plan, where one or more of the following:
A complete application for development under the Planning Act or Condominium Act;
An application for Environmental Compliance Approval; or
An application for a Building Permit
has been received by the applicable implementing body prior to the final approval date of this Source Protection Plan, a related significant drinking water threat may be permitted subject to the policies pertaining to existing threats. Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, the above noted transition policies no longer apply. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-1.3 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Section 57 or Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit or Planning Act application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land use that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act (as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07 Section 62), or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purposes of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the Chief Building Official, as the case may be, that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-1.5 |
The County, in collaboration with other bodies wherever possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs directed at any, or all, significant drinking water threats, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the County and subject to available funding. Such programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of drinking water threats and promotion of best management practices. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-10.1 |
To ensure that the existing handling and storage of road salt greater than 5,000 tonnes ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-10.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of road salt greater than 5,000 tonnes never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat; this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-11.1 |
To ensure that any existing or new storage of snow ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-12.1 |
To ensure that the existing handling and storage of fuel with a volume of more than 250 Litres ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-12.2 |
To ensure that the existing and future handling and storage of fuel with a volume of more than 250 Litres but not more than 2500 Litres, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for property owners with identified fuel oil tanks outlining the requirements of owning a heating oil system including proper maintenance and the steps to be taken if there is a spill or leak detected. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-12.3 |
To ensure that any new handling and storage of fuel within WHPA-A never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat,
This activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited.
Notwithstanding policy NC-CW-12.3a), fuel handling and storage required for emergency back-up generators shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-12.4 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of fuel within WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) with a volume of more than 250 Litres never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-13.1 |
To ensure that any existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural purposes ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-13.2 |
To ensure that any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial institutional and agricultural purposes within WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-13.3 |
To ensure that any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural purposes never becomes a significant drinking water threat, within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score less than (10) or WHPA-C, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-13.4 |
To ensure that any existing or new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall implement an education and outreach program to encourage the use of alternative products where available and the proper disposal of these liquids. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-14.1 |
To ensure that the existing handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-14.2 |
To ensure that any new handling and storage of an organic solvent never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat; this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-15.1 |
To ensure that any new airport where there could be runoff containing de-icing chemicals never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-16.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing located within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or IPZ with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-16.2 |
To ensure that any new farm animal yard or outdoor confinement area located within a WHPA-A or IPZ with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9) never become a significant drinking water threat, where these activities would be a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-16.3 |
To ensure that a farm animal yard or an outdoor confinement area as defined in O. Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act for:
an existing livestock operation not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-A; or, a new livestock operation not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-16.5 |
To ensure that the use of land for livestock grazing, pasturing, farm animal yard or
an outdoor confinement area for existing or new livestock operations ceases to be
or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are, or
would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall develop and
implement an education and outreach program targeted to farms with livestock
grazing, pasturing, farm animal yards or outdoor confinement areas within
vulnerable areas to ensure that those individuals engaged in the activity are
educated in methods to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-17.10 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, Norfolk County shall develop and implement an education and outreach program targeted toward property and business owners within the vulnerable area. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-17.3 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water taking within the WHPAQ1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant
drinking water threat, Norfolk County is encouraged to consider locating additional water supply outside of the WHPA-Q1 where practical.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-17.4 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water taking within the WHPAQ1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant
drinking water threat, Norfolk County shall update their Integrated Sustainable
Master Plan using the findings from the Long Point Region Tier 3 Water Budget
and Local Area Risk Assessment to ensure water allocation does not exceed 80%
of the water supply system's firm capacity. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-17.5 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water takings within the
WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant
drinking water threat, Norfolk County shall update their water conservation plans
using the findings from the Long Point Region Tier 3 Water Budget and Local Area
Risk Assessment to support the sustainable use of water in areas serviced by a
well located within the WHPA-Q1. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-2.2 |
To ensure that any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval under Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, within a WHPA-A this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-2.4 |
To ensure that the establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat,
Future activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 within a WHPA-A and shall be prohibited.
Existing and Future activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required within a WHPA-B or C with a vulnerability score greater than or equal to eight (8) and an IPZ with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9) and a Nitrate ICA outside of a WHPA-A. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-3.1 |
To ensure that any existing or new onsite sewage system and/ or onsite sewage system holding tank with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required under the Ontario Building Code Act. Inspections should be prioritized based on the proximity to the drinking water supply. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-3.2 |
To ensure that any replacement or new septic system and/ or holding tank with a
design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval
under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act never
becomes a significant drinking water threat, the County shall amend their Official
Plan and Zoning By-law to direct land uses relying on these activities to a location
on the same property where these activities would not be a significant drinking
water threat, where possible. Further, the County shall assess the option of
identifying preferred systems (e.g. tertiary treatment) for development. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-3.7 |
To ensure that the existing storage of sewage and/or sewage treatment plant effluent discharges cease to be significant drinking water threats, where such activities are significant drinking water threats, the County shall promote available programs, such as the Grand River Watershed Wastewater Optimization Program. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-4.1 |
To ensure that the existing or future application and storage of agricultural source material to land cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, for lands not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-4.3 |
To ensure that the existing or future application and storage of agricultural source material to land within a WHPA-A or IPZ with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-4.4 |
To ensure that the existing or future application or storage of agricultural source
material ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where
this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall
develop and implement an education and outreach program targeted to individuals
storing and applying agricultural source material to land within vulnerable areas. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-5.2 |
To ensure that the existing or future application or storage of non-agricultural source material on land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat,
the County shall develop and implement an education and outreach program targeted to individuals storing and applying non-agricultural source material to land within vulnerable areas to ensure that those individuals engaged in the activity are
educated in methods to reduce the risk to drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-6.1 |
To ensure that the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or IPZ with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-6.2 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of commercial fertilizer to land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall develop
and implement an education and outreach program targeted to individuals applying commercial fertilizer to land within vulnerable areas to ensure that those individuals engaged in the activity are educated in methods to reduce the risk to
drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-7.1 |
To ensure that any existing handling and storage of more than 2,500 Kilograms of commercial fertilizer as defined in O.Reg. 267/03, under the Nutrient Management Act ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-7.2 |
To ensure that any future handling and storage of more than 2,500 Kilograms of commercial fertilizer as defined in O.Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-8.1 |
To ensure that any existing or future application of pesticides ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-8.2 |
To ensure that the existing or future application of pesticides ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would
be, a significant drinking water threat, the County shall develop and implement an education and outreach program targeted to individuals applying pesticides to land
within vulnerable areas to ensure that those individuals engaged in the activity are educated in methods to reduce the risk to drinking water sources.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-9.1 |
To ensure that any existing handling and storage of pesticides ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-CW-9.2 |
To ensure that the future handling and storage of pesticides never become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-1.4 |
Norfolk County shall amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-Law to:
Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by policies in the Source Protection Plan;
Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-16.4 |
To ensure that a farm animal yard or an outdoor confinement area as defined in O. Reg. 267/03 under the Nutrient Management Act, for an existing or new livestock operation requiring a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review and, if necessary, amend the required Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy to ensure that such Plan/Strategy incorporates measures and/or terms and conditions deemed necessary to ensure that these activities do not become a risk to municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-17.1 |
To ensure that any existing, increased or new consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that groundwater Permit To Take Water approvals include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the long-term sustainability. The Ministry should consider the following condition for inclusion - a phased approach to assess impacts before the permit is fully approved and the requirement for appropriate monitoring. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-17.2 |
When planning for growth and approving development that is to be serviced by an
existing municipal well located within a WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level, the
municipality shall ensure that Planning Act decisions consider the long-term
sustainability of the municipal drinking water system by:
a. ensuring the development and any required expansion of the municipal drinking
water system is consistent with the Integrated Sustainable Master Plan, including
the water allocation threshold; and,
b. consulting with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks to
discuss any necessary amendments to the Permit to Take Water. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-18.1 |
To ensure that any existing and future activity that reduces the recharge of an
aquifer within the WHPA-Q2 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never
becomes a significant drinking water threat, Norfolk County is encouraged to
maintain pre-development recharge where appropriate. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-2.1 |
To ensure that any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review, and if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, ensure that the waste disposal site is managed to reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources.
The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, ongoing monitoring and leak/contamination detection, capture, and treatment methods, as well as run-off prevention techniques completed by the proponent. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-2.3 |
To ensure that the establishment, operation or maintenance of a new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-3.2 |
To ensure that any replacement or new onsite sewage system and/ or onsite sewage system holding tank with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the County shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-law to direct land uses relying on these activities to a location on the same property where these activities would not be a significant drinking water threat, where possible. Further, the County shall assess the option of identifying preferred systems (e.g. tertiary treatment) for development. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-3.3 |
To ensure that an existing onsite sewage system and/ or onsite sewage system holding tank with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that these onsite sewage systems are managed to reduce the risk to drinking water sources.
The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years, and upgrading of these onsite sewage systems to current standards, if necessary. In addition, the terms and conditions may include annual reporting to the County of any monitoring and inspection programs required and their results. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-3.4 |
To ensure that the establishment of a new on-site sewage system and/ or onsite sewage system holding tank with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the County shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-law to prohibit new development which relies on this type of on-site sewage system. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-3.5 |
To ensure that existing or new sanitary sewer and related pipe cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals, where required, be prepared and, if necessary, be amended to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to the municipal drinking water sources. The terms and conditions may include requirements for regular maintenance and inspections conducted by the proponent. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-3.6 |
To ensure that the future storage of sewage, treatment plant effluent discharges, combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet, industrial effluent discharges and/or sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge to surface water never become a significant drinking water threat, where these activities would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-3.8 |
To ensure that combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet, industrial effluent discharges and/or sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge to surface water cease to be significant drinking water threats, where such activities are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review, and if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-3.9 |
To ensure that any existing or new stormwater management facility that discharges stormwater never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions (for example: regular maintenance) that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-4.2 |
To ensure that the existing or future application and storage of agricultural source material to land phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review and, if necessary, amend the Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy to incorporate measures and/or terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-5.1 |
To ensure that the existing and future application of non-agricultural source material to land within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or IPZ with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs or the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as applicable, shall revoke, or not approve, any Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or any activity within the Environmental Compliance Approval process in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act that permits, or would permit, the application of non-agricultural source material within these vulnerable areas. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-5.3 |
To ensure that the existing handling and storage of non-agricultural source material within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as applicable, shall review and, if necessary, amend a Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or an Environmental Compliance Approval, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to incorporate measures and/or terms and conditions that, when implemented, will reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-MC-5.4 |
To ensure that any new facility for the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material on lands within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or IPZ with a vulnerability score equal to nine (9) never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-1.15 |
To ensure that spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a WHPA or IPZ along highways, railway lines or shipping lanes,
The County is requested to incorporate the location of WHPAs and IPZs into their emergency response plans in order to protect drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways, rail lines or shipping lanes.
The Ministry of the Environment is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
|
Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-1.16 |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the County is requested to support ongoing programs which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903 where such activities could be a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-1.17 |
The Ministry of Environment should, collaboratively with the County, develop a consultation process related to document sharing and consultation on the issuance and/or notification of prescribed instruments, which could be used to guide information exchange between the two agencies to protect municipal drinking water sources. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-1.7 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support for incentive programs to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program and the Rural Water Quality Program.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-1.8 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from the following existing and future activities, where such activities are or would be significant drinking water threats, the Long Point Region Conservation Authority, in consultation with the County, will deliver available cost share incentive programs, as long as the Long Point Region Conservation Authority has such programs and outreach staff available, and work with affected land owners to implement best management practices for the following activities:
i. The application of agricultural source material to land;
ii. The storage of agricultural source material; and,
iii. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-17.6 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should support and fund the ongoing maintenance of the Long Point Region Tier 3 Water Budget model. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-17.7 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is encouraged to fund Norfolk County municipal capacity to support water management decisions and updates to their Integrated Sustainable Master Plan. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-17.8 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should use findings from the Long Point Region, Catfish Creek and Kettle Creek Tier 2 Water Quantity Stress Assessment and the Long Point Region Tier 3 Water Budget and Local Area Risk Assessment to reassess the High Water Use Designation for Norfolk County. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-17.9 |
To ensure that any existing and future consumptive water taking within the WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should consider the prioritization of water uses in Simcoe where a permitted water taking could impact the sustainability of the municipal water supply given challenges in locating new water supplies in Norfolk County. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB-19.1 |
To ensure that the the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of Ontario Regulation 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the National Energy Board Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the pipeline proponent, the National Energy Board, and Ontario Energy Board are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the County the location of any new proposed pipeline within the County and/or Source Protection Area. The Source Protection Authority should document in the annual report the number of new pipelines proposed within vulnerable areas if a pipeline has been proposed and/or application has been received. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NC-NB/CW-1.6 |
The Conservation Authority, and/or County, in collaboration with other implementing bodies and levels of government wherever possible, may develop and implement incentive programs directed at various significant threat activities
where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the Conservation Authority and/or County, subject to available funding. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NF-1 |
No new waste disposal sites for the application of untreated septage to land shall be permitted within the Niagara Falls IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NF-2 |
No new combined sewers, wastewater treatment facilities, stormwater management facilities, or industrial effluent systems shall be permitted where they would be a significant threat within the Niagara Falls IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NF-3 |
No new industrial or commercial land uses shall be permitted within the Niagara Falls IPZ-1, in order to prevent significant threats related to stormwater discharges. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NF-4 |
In consideration of existing or future significant threats related to stormwater discharges within the Niagara Falls IPZ-1, an Outreach and Education program shall be established by the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect that promotes good stewardship of water resources and stormwater management systems. The Outreach and Education program should target local industries and residents located within the Niagara Falls IPZ-1. This Outreach and Education program may be implemented by NPCA in combination with other Outreach and Education programs at its discretion.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
NF-5 |
No new agricultural land uses are permitted within the Niagara Falls IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
NF-6 |
No new Category 3 Non-Agricultural Source Material application, or handling and storage, shall be permitted within the Niagara Falls IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
NF-7 |
In accordance with Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with the Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Intake Protection zones.
Niagara Region, in cooperation with the City of Niagara Falls and the Niagara Parks Commission, will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the SPA. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within the Niagara Falls IPZ-1.
This policy will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan by Niagara Region. This policy should be implemented within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-1 |
Applicable Activities: The storage of snow that is an existing significant drinking water threat, where the snow is not stored along the side of a road as a result of snow plowing.
O-1(1): Assess the feasibility of relocating the activity to a site where it would not be a significant drinking water threat within one year. If an appropriate alternate site is identified, the activity will be relocated to the alternate site within two years.
O-1(2): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) The results of the feasibility exercise identified in (1).
O-1(3): If an appropriate alternate site is not identified per (1), the activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-1-S-a |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway cease to be or do not become a significant threat, and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the following policies apply:
a. Municipalities are requested to use best management practices to protect the quantity and quality of groundwater sources during maintenance and the installation of new municipal infrastructure in proximity to municipal wells.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-1-S-b |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway cease to be or do not become a significant threat, and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the following policies apply:
b. Municipalities are requested to incorporate conditions of approval for development applications to ensure private wells that are no longer in use are decommissioned in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-1-S-c |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway cease to be or do not become a significant threat, and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the following policies apply:
c. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and the municipalities responsible for water services are requested to provide ongoing funding for incentive programs focused on the decommissioning of wells, and for education and outreach programs regarding the decommissioning of wells in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-1-S-d |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway cease to be or do not become a significant threat, and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the following policies apply:
d. If funding is provided by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks through the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program, the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities shall implement the incentive program to decommission unused wells in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-1-S-e |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway cease to be or do not become a significant threat, and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the following policies apply:
e. The municipalities are requested to develop a program to facilitate, where possible and appropriate, the connection to municipal water services of current private well users within the urban area. The users should be required to decommission the unused wells in accordance with Ontario Regulation 903. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-1-S-f |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway cease to be or do not become a significant threat, and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the following policies apply:
f. The municipalities are requested to prohibit the construction of new wells and septic systems within the urban area where municipal water and wastewater services are available. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-1-S-h |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, that drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway cease to be or do not become a significant threat, and that a pathway ceases to endanger the source water of a municipal water supply, the following policies apply:
h. The Source Protection Authority and Source Protection Committee, upon receipt of a notice from a municipality regarding an application for development of a transport pathway within a wellhead protection area, shall refer the notice to the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities for follow up and reporting back.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-2 |
Applicable Activities: The storage of snow that would be a future significant drinking water threat, where the snow is not stored along the side of the road as a result of snow plowing.
O-2: The activity is prohibited and designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
O-2-S-a |
To ensure that data on the climate conditions in the Source Protection Area are gathered on an ongoing basis, the following policies apply:
a. The municipalities (excluding County of Wellington), the Halton Region and Hamilton Conservation Authorities, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry, and Environment and Climate Change Canada are encouraged in their efforts to collect and/or interpret the hydrogeological, hydrological, and climate data for the Source Protection Areas and are requested to share the data as appropriate in a timely manner.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-2-S-b |
To ensure that data on the climate conditions in the Source Protection Area are gathered on an ongoing basis, the following policies apply:
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested, in collaboration with Environment and Climate Change Canada, to install best practical instrumentation to provide monitoring of current speed and direction and water chemistry of Lake Ontario in the nearshore source water. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-2-S-c |
To ensure that data on the climate conditions in the Source Protection Area are gathered on an ongoing basis, the following policies apply:
c. Environment and Climate Change Canada is requested to review its monitoring network to ensure appropriate locations are utilized for climate stations, and that data for all necessary parameters, including solar radiation, used to monitor climate change are being collected. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-2-S-d |
To ensure that data on the climate conditions in the Source Protection Area are gathered on an ongoing basis, the following policies apply:
d. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, in collaboration with the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities, is requested to review its monitoring networks for groundwater and surface water to ensure appropriate locations and adequate construction of monitoring wells and stations are utilized, and that data for all necessary parameters that could be used to monitor climate change are being collected. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-4-S |
The municipalities and the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities are requested to develop and implement an education and outreach program for rural landowners, contractors, and developers based on Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks guidance to best protect drinking water sources during the disposal or use of excess fill/soil including but not limited to contaminated soil. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-5-S-a |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area or intake protection zone along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes, the following policies apply:
a. The municipalities are requested to incorporate the location of wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones into their emergency response plans and train staff, in order to protect drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways, rail lines, or in shipping lanes.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-5-S-b |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area or intake protection zone along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes, the following policies apply:
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide mapping of vulnerable areas and train staff to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-5-S-c |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a wellhead protection area or intake protection zone along highways, railway lines, or shipping lanes, the following policies apply:
c. The Ministry of Transportation Ontario, Transport Canada and the Spills Action Centre are requested to work together to implement an education and outreach program to encourage all transportation businesses that ship goods through wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones to prepare spill prevention plans and spill contingency plans, to review these plans annually, and to update them, and train staff, as required. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-6-S-a |
a. The Hamilton-Oshawa Port Authority is requested to include information on the Halton-Hamilton source water protection program and intake protection zone maps in their internal emergency response plans and notify the local municipality of known spill events. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-6-S-b |
b. Transport Canada is requested to advise vessel operators using Hamilton Harbour and western Lake Ontario shipping lanes, and the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to advise the companies in the vicinity of the port to update their spill control plans to include:
i. the location of the municipal drinking water intakes,
ii. best practices for spill containment and cleanup to protect drinking water supplies, and
iii. the City of Hamilton, Halton Region and Spills Action Centre emergency contact information.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-7-S |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to reach out to the Ontario Region of Environment and Climate Change Canada to share information about water resources obtained through the source protection planning process. This sharing of information could result in an update to the document "Environmental Sensitivity Atlas for Lake Ontario's Canadian Shoreline" to include maps of the current drinking water infrastructure, as well as the current knowledge and understanding of the conditions of the Canadian shoreline of Lake Ontario. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O-8-S |
To raise the profile of the importance of Lake Ontario as a source of drinking water for residents of Ontario and to encourage collaboration on protecting our shared drinking water sources, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to reach out to Environment and Climate Change Canada, New York State, and United States government agencies to discuss the findings and policies arising from source protection planning. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O.11.1 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, the conservation authority should commence an outreach and education program to assist landowners and developers in understanding the impacts of land uses and activities on areas identified as highly vulnerable aquifers in the Assessment Report. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O.11.2 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, the conservation authority should commence an outreach and education program to assist land owners and developers in understanding the impacts of land uses and activities on areas identified as significant groundwater recharge areas in the Assessment Report. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O.11.3 |
Each municipality should ensure that their emergency preparedness plans, and the spills containment plans, contain specific policies and actions to protect sources of drinking water within wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones along highways, railway lines or shipping lanes. This should be conducted during regular updates to these documents. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O.11.4 |
The Conservation Authority should collect available data pertaining to climate and provide information to the Source Protection Committee. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O.11.5 |
The Ministry of the Environment, in keeping with Section 97, Clean Water Act 2006, should provide adequate ongoing funding to the lead Source Protection Authority for the delivery of stewardship activities for the Source Protection Region. The purpose of the program is to provide financial assistance in accordance with the regulations to:
* persons whose activities or properties are affected by the Act and,
* persons and bodies who administer incentive programs and education and outreach programs that are related to source protection plans and,
* other persons and bodies, in circumstances specified in the regulations that are related to the protection of existing or future sources of drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
O.11.6 |
In accordance with Section 22 (7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within the Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or within an Intake Protection Zone or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
Municipalities will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the SPAs. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or an Intake Protection or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
The above policies will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan within each Source Protection Area. These policies, in conjunction with additional education and outreach policies, should be implemented within 2 years after the effective date of the plan. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.01 |
Where a term is italicized within the policies of this Chapter of the Source Protection Plan, the following corresponding definitions shall apply. Defined terms are intended to capture both the singular and plural forms of these terms.
Area Municipality - means one or more of the eight lower tier municipalities located within the County, consisting of the City of Woodstock, Town of Tillsonburg, Town of Ingersoll and Townships of Blandford-Blenheim, East Zorra-Tavistock, Norwich, Southwest-Oxford and Zorra.
County - means the County of Oxford.
Existing - means undertaken or established as of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or at some point prior to the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect with a demonstrated intent to continue.
New or Future - means not existing, as defined in this Source Protection Plan. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.02 |
Except as set out below, or as otherwise prescribed by the Clean Water Act, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date of the posting of the notice of approval of this Source Protection Plan on the Environmental Registry.
For policies written pursuant to Section 43(2) of the Clean Water Act (prescribed instruments), amendments to existing prescribed instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the effective date of the Source Protection Plan;
For policies written pursuant to Section 40(2) of the Clean Water Act (Official Plan conformity), amendments to the Official Plan required to conform with the policies of this SPP shall be initiated by the County as soon as possible after the effective date of the SPP with the goal of being adopted within three (3) years from the effective date of the SPP. For policies written pursuant to Section 42 of the Clean Water Act Zoning By-law conformity), amendments to Zoning By-laws required to conform with the policies of this Source Protection Plan shall be initiated as soon as possible after the effective date of the SPP and adopted by the Area Municipalities within three (3) years of the effective date of the above noted amendments to the Official Plan;
Policies written pursuant to Section 22(6) of the Clean Water Act (other contents), shall be implemented within two (2) years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan; and
Policies written pursuant to Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act (incentive programs and education and outreach) shall be implemented within two (2) years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
If an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan takes effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location (as per Sec. 58(4) of the CWA, 2006), the policies written pursuant to Section 58 shall apply on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date notice is given. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.03 |
1. Despite the definition of existing, where development is being proposed by one or more of the following applications:
a. A site-specific amendment to a zoning by-law under Subsection 34(10) of the Planning Act;
b. A site plan under Subsection 41(4) of the Planning Act; or
c. A building permit under the Building Code Act,
a significant drinking water threat activity that is to be established as part of the proposed development may be considered existing for the purposes of complying with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies, provided that:
* The application was deemed to be complete by the applicable approval authority as of the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect; and
* The applicant has certified to the satisfaction of the implementing body named in the applicable significant drinking water threat policy that a particular significant drinking water threat activity is specifically intended to be undertaken as a part of the proposed development.
Where further development approvals are required to establish the development and related significant drinking water threat activity proposed by such application, that activity may also be considered as existing for the purposes of determining whether those subsequent approvals comply with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies.
The above noted transition provisions shall cease to apply where any of the approvals or applications required to implement the proposed development have been denied by the applicable approval authority and/or, where applicable, the relevant appeal body, or have lapsed or been withdrawn.
2. Despite the definition of existing, where a significant drinking water threat activity is directly related to a land use permitted by existing zoning and does not require any approvals under
the Planning Act or Ontario Building Code Act to be lawfully established on a property, such activity shall be considered existing for the purposes of compliance with the applicable significant drinking water
threat policies. This provision shall cease to apply at such time as a Risk Management Official or Inspector has conducted a property-specific assessment and documented the significant drinking water threat
activities undertaken or established on a property as of that point in time, following which any significant drinking water threat activity not so documented
shall be considered as new or future from that point forward.
3. Despite the definition of existing, where a significant drinking water threat activity is being proposed by way of a new or amended prescribed instrument, it shall be considered existing for the purposes of complying with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies provided that the application for the new or amended prescribed instrument was deemed to be complete by the applicable approval authority as of the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.04 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, all land uses identified within the County Official Plan and/or Area Municipal Zoning By-laws, that are located within an area where Sections 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act applies (Well Head Protection Areas A, B or C and Issue Contributing Areas), are hereby designated for the purposes of Section 59 (Restricted Land Uses), with the exception of residential uses. Within these designated land use categories and areas, a notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with Section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act shall be required prior to approval of any Planning Act or Building Permit application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site-specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site-specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as the case may be, is satisfied that:
The application complies with the written direction from the Risk Management Official; and
The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.05 |
The County shall amend the Official Plan and the Area Municipalities shall amend their respective Zoning By-laws to:
- Identify the WHPAs and/or ICAs in which a significant drinking water threat could occur;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by the policies contained in the Source Protection Plan;
- Identify the significant drinking water threats that are prohibited through Prescribed Instruments, or Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, in accordance with the significant drinking water threat-specific policies contained in this Source Protection Plan;
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the significant drinking water threat-specific land use policies or to have regard to the low and/or moderate threat-specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan; and,
- Incorporate a cross-reference indicating an applicant cannot make a planning application unless it includes a notice issued by the risk management official, as set out in Section 59(1) of the CWA and Section 62 of O.Reg. 287/07. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.06 |
Education and Outreach programs designed to increase awareness and understanding of drinking water threats, and promote best management practices as a means of reducing the risks to drinking water sources, shall be developed and implemented collaboratively by the County/Conservation Authority/Provincial partners with the Conservation Authority providing a lead role.
The programs shall address low, moderate and significant drinking water threats with the priority placed on significant drinking water threats. The focus should be on incorporating Drinking Water Source Protection messaging into existing education and outreach materials and programs as a first priority. New education and outreach materials and programs may also be developed and implemented, if deemed necessary and/or appropriate, and be subject to available funding.
The County and Conservation Authorities, in collaboration with the Province (Ministry of Environment), should consider options for the long-term support of education and outreach programs. The program scope shall be subject to available funding. |
Upper Thames River |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.07 |
The County and Conservation Authorities, in collaboration with the Province (Ministry of Environment) and other bodies where possible, shall consider supporting existing incentive programs and/or where deemed necessary or appropriate, the development and implementation of new incentive programs directed at existing significant drinking water threats.
Such incentive programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to assisting with the costs of implementing risk mitigation practices and transport pathway maintenance and decommissioning and shall be subject to available funding.
Incentives shall only be considered for existing significant drinking water threats as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07. However, incentives shall not be considered for the application of untreated septage; the storage of mine tailings; the application of non-agricultural source material (NASM); the handling and storage of NASM; and the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.08 |
The Province (Ministry of Environment) shall be encouraged to continue funding the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program, as outlined in Section 97 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and Section 69 of O. Reg. 287/07, to adequately fund risk management practices for significant drinking water threats in areas where significant threats may occur. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.09 |
The Ministry of Environment should, collaboratively with the County, develop a consultation process related to document sharing and consultation on the issuance and/or notification of prescribed instruments, which could be used to guide information exchange between the two agencies to protect municipal drinking water sources. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.10 |
In accordance with Section 22 (7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of Environment as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design signage, to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs). The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial highways within WHPA with a vulnerability score of 10. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-1.11 |
As part of an overall education and outreach program within each Source Protection Area (SPA), Municipalities shall consider placing Source Protection advisory signage, where municipal arterial roads are located within Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPA) with a vulnerability score of 10. Such signage shall be consistent with the design developed by the Province in collaboration with the SPA and municipalities would be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of such signs. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.01 |
For any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act or as defined by the Ontario Water Resources Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall review and, where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.02 |
For any existing waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act or as defined by the Ontario Water Resources Act that is not subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.03 |
For any new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act or as defined by the Ontario Water Resources Act that requires an Environmental Compliance Approval, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.04 |
With the exception of the following waste disposal site threat subcategories:
- storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste; or
- storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste, where any new waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, that does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.04.1 |
Where a new waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval and comprises one of the following waste disposal site threat subcategories:
* storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste; or
* storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste,
and where such waste disposal site would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity such that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The requirements of the risk management plan may be based on Ministry of the Environment tools and requirements for such activities, as set out in the Environmental Protection Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.05 |
For any septic system or septic system holding tanks regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act, where such systems are:
existing (including expansions, modifications or replacements); or
new and required for a municipal water supply well; or
new and located within an ICA, but outside of a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score of 10,
and where these activities are, or would be significant drinking water threats, the County shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required by the Ontario Building Code Act so that these activities cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.06 |
For new septic systems or septic system holding tanks regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act, with the exception of:
those required for a municipal water supply well; or
those located within an ICA, but outside of a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score of 10,
where these activities would be a significant drinking water threat, the Area Municipalities shall amend their respective Zoning By-laws to prohibit uses, buildings or structures that would require a new septic system or septic system holding tank to be located within the above noted significant drinking water threat areas so that these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.07 |
For septic systems or septic system holding tanks subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act, where such systems are:
existing (including expansions, modifications or replacements); or
new and located within an ICA, but outside of a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score of 10,
and where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall review and, where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage these activities so that they cease to be, or never become, significant drinking water threats.
The terms and conditions should include, but not necessarily be limited to:
requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts;
contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected;
regular and ongoing compliance monitoring;
mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years;
annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority and the County on any required inspection or monitoring programs; and
upgrading of these septic systems to current standards, where necessary. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.08 |
For a new septic system or septic system holding tank requiring an Environmental Compliance Approval, in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act that is located within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score of 10, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit these activities through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process so that they never become significant drinking water threats. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.09 |
For any existing:
sewage treatment plant effluent discharges;
storage of sewage;
industrial effluent discharge;
sewage treatment plant by-pass discharges; or
combined sewer discharge
where these activities are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall review and, where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage these activities so that they cease to be significant drinking water threats. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.10 |
For any new:
sewage treatment plant effluent discharges;
storage of sewage;
industrial effluent discharge;
sewage treatment plant by-pass discharges; or
combined sewer discharge,
where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit these activities through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process so that they never become significant drinking water threats. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.11 |
For any existing or new sanitary sewer and related pipes, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that Environmental Compliance Approvals for these activities are prepared, or, where necessary, amended to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, will manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. The terms and conditions may include, but not necessarily be limited to, requirements for regular maintenance and inspections by the holder of the Environmental Compliance Approval. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.12 |
For stormwater management facilities that discharge stormwater; where such facilities are:
existing; or
new and located within an ICA, where the drainage area associated with the stormwater management facility is less than or equal to 100 hectares,
and, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall review and, where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.13 |
For new stormwater management facilities that would discharge stormwater, with the exception of: new facilities located within an ICA, where the drainage area associated with the stormwater management facility is less than or equal to 100 hectares, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.14 |
For any new or existing application of agricultural source material to land within a WHPA-A, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.15 |
For any new or existing application of agricultural source material to land outside of a WHPA 'A', where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
Any Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act that is created, amended or used for the purposes of obtaining an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O. Reg. 287/07, shall incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, manage the activities they regulate such that those activities cease to be, or never become, a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions, including the Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or is sued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.16 |
For any new storage of agricultural source material, within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score of 10, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.17 |
For storage of agricultural source material, where such storage is:
existing; or
new and located within an ICA, but outside of a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score of 10,
and, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat. The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official, particularly where such activity is located within an ICA.
Any Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act that is created, amended or used for the purposes of obtaining an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O. Reg. 287/07, shall incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, manage the activities they regulate such that those activities cease to be, or never become, a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions, including the Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or is sued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.18 |
For any new or existing application of non-agricultural source material to land where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs or the Ministry of the Environment, as applicable, shall prohibit this activity through the Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan process, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or through the Environmental Compliance Approval process, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, so that this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.19 |
For any existing facility for the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or Ministry of the Environment, as applicable, shall review and, if necessary, amend the required Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or Environmental Compliance Approval, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, so that Plans/Compliance Approvals incorporate terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, manage this activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.20 |
For any new handling and storage of non-agricultural source material, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs or Ministry of the Environment, as applicable, shall prohibit this activity through the Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan process in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or through the Environmental Compliance Approval process in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, so that this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.21 |
For the existing or future application of commercial fertilizer to land, on properties zoned for any other use than residential, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat.
Any Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act that is created, amended or used for the purposes of obtaining an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O. Reg. 287/07, shall incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, manage the activities they regulate such that those activities cease to be, or never become, a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions, including the Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or is sued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.22 |
For handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, where such handling and storage is:
existing; or
new and the total mass of all materials handled or stored that contain the commercial fertilizer, in any form including liquid or solid, is less than or equal to 2,500 kilograms
and, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.23 |
For handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, where such handling and storage is:
- new and the total mass of all materials handled or stored that contain the commercial fertilizer, in any form including liquid or solid, is greater than 2,500 kilograms;
and, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.24 |
For the existing or future application of pesticides to land, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.25 |
For any existing facility for the handling and storage of pesticides, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.26 |
For any new handling and storage of pesticides, where the total mass of all materials stored that contain a pesticide prescribed under the Clean Water Act, in any form, including liquid or solid, is more than 2500 kilograms, and where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.27 |
For any new handling and storage of pesticides not addressed by policy OC-2.26, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.28 |
For any existing or new handling and storage of road salt, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.29 |
For storage of snow that is:
existing; or
new and at or above grade where the storage area is less than or equal to 1 hectare
and, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.30 |
For new storage of snow that is:
below grade; or
at or above grade, where the storage area exceeds 1 hectare
and, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.31 |
For existing handling and storage of fuel, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.32 |
For new handling and storage of fuel, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat,
This activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat
Notwithstanding OC-2.32a, any handling and storage of fuel required for back-up generators at municipal supply wells shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.33 |
For any existing or new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned exclusively for residential and/or environmental protection purposes in the Area Municipal Zoning By-laws, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat,
The County, in collaboration with the Source Protection Authority, Area Municipalities, the Ministry of the Environment, and/or other bodies wherever possible, shall develop and implement an education and outreach program directed at the owners and/or occupants of such properties so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. The program may include, but not necessarily be limited to, the provision of education material and information about the nature of the threat, how DNAPLs can be identified handled and disposed of appropriately.
Notwithstanding (OC-2.33.1), where the quantity and/or volume of DNAPLs handled or stored on a property exceeds that typical of household use, the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.34 |
For any existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned for any other use than residential and/or environmental protection in the Area Municipal Zoning By-laws, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.35 |
For any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned for any other use than residential and/or environmental protection in the Area Municipal Zoning By-laws and located within a WHPA 'A' or 'B' with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.36 |
For any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned for any other use than residential and/or environmental protection in the Area Municipal Zoning By-laws and located within a WHPA 'B' with a vulnerability score of less than ten (10), or a WHPA 'C', where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.37 |
For existing handling and storage of an organic solvent, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.38 |
For new handling and storage of an organic solvent, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited so that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.39 |
For a new airport where runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft would be a significant drinking water threat this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.40 |
For the existing or future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard, where these activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, they shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Any Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act that is created, amended or used for the purposes of obtaining an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O. Reg. 287/07, shall incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, manage the activities they regulate such that those activities cease to be, or never become, a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions, including the Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or is sued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.41 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from activities that are regulated under the Nutrient Management Act, where these activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Province, through the Ministry of Environment Agricultural Officer, should consider source protection information as a criterion when setting inspection targets and priorities as part of the Ministry's on-farm compliance program. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.42 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from existing land application of untreated septage, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should consider source protection information as a criterion when setting inspection targets and priorities. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.43 |
The Province should consider waiving application fees in instances where Prescribed Instruments (PI) are required to be amended for the sole reason of satisfying the policies in this Source Protection Plan. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.44 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from septic systems or septic holding tanks that are subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA), in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act and which are a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should develop a compliance monitoring program. The compliance monitoring should include inspection of the system to ensure that it continues to function as designed, meets applicable design standards, and is being properly maintained. Priorities for the compliance monitoring program should include areas where known septic failures have been identified and areas where older systems have not recently been inspected. Systems found to be deficient are required to undertake improvements to be in compliance.
Where the system is subject to a mandatory inspection as per conditions on the ECA as outlined in Policy OC-2.07, the compliance monitoring program may consider a certificate produced by a qualified person as proof that the system has been inspected and is properly functioning. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.45 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the land application of pesticides, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should consider compliance monitoring (including inspection). Compliance monitoring should be considered for Pesticide Permits issued under the Pesticide Act, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat. The Ministry of Environment should consider source protection information as a criterion when setting inspection targets and priorities. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.46 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from fuel storage tanks located on abandoned properties where the storage of fuel is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should consider undertaking the removal of fuel storage tanks when they become aware of them. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-2.47 |
For the existing or future application of commercial fertilizer to land, on properties zoned exclusively for residential purposes in the Area Municipal Zoning By-laws, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the County, in collaboration with the Source Protection Authority, Area Municipalities, the Ministry of the Environment, and/or other bodies wherever possible, shall develop and implement an education and outreach program directed at the owners and/or occupants of such properties and local lawn care companies. The program may include, but not necessarily be limited to, the provision of education material and information about the nature of the threat and how commercial fertilizer can be handled and applied in a manner that would manage the activity so that it ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-3.01 |
To reduce the threat to municipal drinking water sources from the land application of pesticides, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should consider reviewing and amending Pesticide Permits issued under the Pesticides Act, to incorporate conditions to address the protection of municipal drinking water sources where this activity is, or would be, a low or moderate drinking water threat. |
Upper Thames River |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-3.02 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from new activities that would be:
* subject to one or more Prescribed Instruments; and
* located in areas where the activity would be a moderate or low drinking water threat;
the province should consider incorporating terms and conditions. These terms and conditions, when implemented, should manage the activity such that it does not become a Significant Drinking Water Threat. Where appropriate these terms and conditions should reduce the risk. |
Upper Thames River |
Low, Moderate |
Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.01 |
To ensure spill prevention plans, spill contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting municipal drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur along highways or railway lines located within a WHPA,
The County and Area Municipalities should consider incorporating the location of WHPAs into their emergency response plans; and,
The Ministry of the Environment should consider providing mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to the Spills Action Centre to assist them in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.02 |
The Ministry of Environment should consider reviewing their programs pertaining to the decommissioning of abandoned water wells, in accordance with O. Reg. 903 of the Ontario Water Resources Act in order to ensure that sufficient staff and financial resources are allocated to such programs to ensure their effective implementation. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.03 |
To reduce the potential for transport pathways to increase the risk to municipal drinking water sources, municipalities should consider:
including, as a condition of approval for relevant development applications, confirmation of the decommissioning of unused wells in accordance with O. Reg. 903 of the Ontario Water Resources Act (OWRA);
municipal by-laws to restrict the creation of new transport pathways such as geothermal energy systems, in areas where prescribed drinking water threats would be significant and where alternative services are available. The municipality, in consultation with the Risk Management Official, shall be responsible for determining exceptions to these by-laws; and
encouraging landowners to improve their wells to meet Provincial standards including making landowners aware of any financial incentives which may be available. If the landowner fails to take appropriate action, the Municipality should notify the Ministry of Environment (MOE) for the purpose of enforcing the standards under O. Reg. 903 of OWRA or other regulations where applicable. Such notification should clearly indicate that the deficiency is occurring in a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) and therefore may increase the risk to municipal drinking water sources.
https://dwt.swpip.ca//Link?id=11101 |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.04 |
Under S.27 (3) of the Clean Water Act, O. Reg. 287/07, municipalities shall notify the Source Protection Authority (SPA) and the Source Protection Committee (SPC) if a person applies to the municipality for the approval of a proposal to engage in any activity in a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) that may result in the creation of a new transport pathway or the modification of an existing transport pathway. This notice shall include a description of the proposal, the identity of the person responsible for the proposal, and a description of the approvals that are required to engage in the proposed activity. The notification shall be included as part of the existing planning process where possible and the proponent is required to be provided with a copy of the notification. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.05 |
The Conservation Authorities within the Source Protection Region shall work collaboratively with the municipalities of the Source Protection Region to develop guidance to identify the activities that will create transport pathways and the locations within which municipalities are required to provide notification of such new or altered transport pathways in accordance with Section 27(3) of O. Reg. 287/07 of the Clean Water Act. This guidance shall be available as soon as possible after the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.06 |
The Province (Ministry of Environment), in collaboration with municipalities and Conservation Authorities, shall consider developing a program designed to identify transport pathways within Wellhead Protection Areas (WHPAs) A, B, C and D. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.07 |
The Ministry of Environment (MOE) is strongly encouraged to undertake an updated risk-based program analysis of the compliance program associated with the Wells Regulation [R.R.O., 1990 Regulation 903 (Wells) as amended, made under the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O., 1990, c. ). 40].
The program analysis should consider:
- Increased MOE field presence with well contractors
- Complaint response prioritization where the presence of a transport pathway would endanger sources of municipal drinking water,
- Focusing resources in areas where improperly constructed, maintained or abandoned wells may increase the potential threat to municipal drinking water sources. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.08 |
Municipalities should consider the effect of municipal infrastructure and development servicing on the vulnerability of a Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) in order to ensure such transport pathways are appropriately managed and/or designed so that they do not increase the risk to municipal drinking water. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.09 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from transport pathways located within vulnerable areas, the Province (Ministry of Environment) should consider placing greater focus on the enforcement of standards and requirements for wells to be installed by licensed installers and decommissioned according to applicable standards by qualified individuals. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-4.10 |
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from activities subject to an environmental assessment (EA) in areas where the activity would be a significant, moderate or low drinking water threat the Conservation Authorities (CAs) should:
* review EA documentation when circulated by the proponent;
* provide available Source Protection information; and
* request Source Protection Planning information (including an assessment of risks for the proposed and preferred alternatives) be included in the EA.
Participation in this program by the CAs will be contingent on funding and municipal support of the CA involvement in this program. |
Upper Thames River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below or as otherwise prescribed by Section 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan takes effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan takes effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date notice is given;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 restricted land use policies shall come into effect on the day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. For Section 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if an activity was engaged in a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan takes effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
e. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 the amendments to the Official Plan required to conform with the significant threat policies shall be adopted by the County within five (5) years of the effective date of the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan. The amendments to the Zoning By-Laws required to conform with the relevant significant threat policies in this Source Protection Plan shall be adopted by the Area Municipalities within three (3) years of the effective date of the above noted amendments to the Official Plan; and
f. Where the Source Protection Policies require the development of education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.16 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a) The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b) Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the municipality. No provision of this Plan shall derogate from any applicable law. |
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.17 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of Drinking Water Threats and Circumstances (swpip.ca), Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the Province or the municipality.
|
Grand River, Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.2-CC |
i) Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where development is being proposed
by one or more of the following applications:
a. A site specific amendment to a zoning by-law under
subsection 34(10) of the Planning Act;
b. Approval of development in a site plan control area under
subsection 41(4) of the Planning Act; or
c. A building permit under the Building Code Act.
A significant drinking water threat activity that is to be established as part of the
proposed development may be considered existing for the purposes of
complying with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies, provided
that:
a. The application was deemed to be complete by the applicable
approval authority as of the date this Source Protection Plan takes
effect; and
b. The applicant has certified to the satisfaction of the implementing
body named in the applicable significant drinking water threat policy
that a particular significant drinking water threat activity is to be
undertaken as part of the proposed development.
Where further development approvals are required to establish the development
and related significant drinking water threat activity proposed by such
application, that activity may also be considered as existing for the purposes of
determining whether those subsequent approvals comply with the applicable
significant drinking water threat policies.
The above noted transition provisions shall cease to apply where any of the
approvals or applications required to implement the proposed development
have been denied by the applicable approval authority and, where applicable,
the relevant appeal body, or have lapsed or been withdrawn.
ii) Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where a significant drinking water
threat activity is directly related to a land use permitted by existing zoning and
such activity does not require any approvals under the Planning Act or Ontario
Building Code Act to be lawfully established on a property, such activity shall be
considered existing for the purposes of compliance with the applicable
significant drinking water threat policies.
iii) Notwithstanding the definition of existing or the provisions contained in
subsection i) or ii) of OC-CW-1.2, where a Risk Management Inspector has
conducted a property specific assessment and documented the significant
drinking water threat activities that are undertaken or established on a property
as of that point in time, any significant drinking water threat activity not so
documented shall be considered new or future from that point forward.
iv) Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where a significant drinking water
threat activity is being proposed by way of a new or amended prescribed
instrument, it shall be considered existing for the purposes of complying with the
applicable significant drinking water threat policies provided that the application
for the new or amended prescribed instrument was deemed to be complete by
the applicable approval authority as of the date this Source Protection Plan
takes effect. |
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.2-GR |
a) Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where development is being proposed by one or more of the following applications:
a. A site specific amendment to a zoning by-law under subsection 34(10) of the Planning Act;
b. A site plan under subsection 41(4) of the Planning Act; or
c. A building permit under the Building Code Act,
a significant drinking water threat activity that is to be established as part of the proposed development may be considered existing for the purposes of
complying with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies, provided that:
i. The application was deemed to be complete by the applicable
approval authority as of the date this Source Protection Plan takes
effect; and
ii. The applicant has certified to the satisfaction of the implementing
body named in the applicable significant drinking water threat policy that a particular significant drinking water threat activity is to
be undertaken as part of the proposed development.
Where further development approvals are required to establish the development
and related significant drinking water threat activity proposed by such
application, that activity may also be considered as existing for the purposes of
determining whether those subsequent approvals comply with the applicable
significant drinking water threat policies.
The above noted transition provisions shall cease to apply where any of the
approvals or applications required to implement the proposed development
have been denied by the applicable approval authority and, where applicable,
the relevant appeal body, or have lapsed or been withdrawn
b) Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where a significant drinking water
threat activity is directly related to a land use permitted by existing zoning
and does not require any approvals under the Planning Act or Ontario
Building Code Act to be lawfully established on a property, such activity
shall be considered existing for the purposes of compliance with the
applicable significant drinking water threat policies. This provision shall cease to apply at such time as a Risk Management Inspector has
conducted a property specific assessment and documented the significant
drinking water threat activities that are undertaken or established on a
property as of that point in time, following which any significant drinking
water threat activity not so documented shall be considered new or future.
c) Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where a significant drinking water
threat activity is being proposed by way of a new or amended Prescribed
Instrument, it shall be considered existing for the purposes of complying
with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies provided that
the application for the new or amended Prescribed Instrument was deemed
to be complete by the applicable approval authority as of the date this
Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.2-LP |
a. Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where development is being
proposed by one or more of the following applications:
i. A site specific amendment to a zoning by-law under subsection 34(10)
of the Planning Act;
ii. A site plan under subsection 41(4) of the Planning Act; or
iii. A building permit under the Building Code Act,
a significant drinking water threat activity that is to be established as part of
the proposed development may be considered existing for the purposes of
complying with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies,
provided that:
iv. The application was deemed to be complete by the applicable approval
authority as of the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect; and
v. The applicant has certified to the satisfaction of the implementing body
named in the applicable significant drinking water threat policy that a
particular significant drinking water threat activity is to be undertaken as part of the proposed development.
Where further development approvals are required to establish the
development and related significant drinking water threat activity proposed by
such application, that activity may also be considered as existing for the
purposes of determining whether those subsequent approvals comply with the
applicable significant drinking water threat policies.
The above noted transition provisions shall cease to apply where any of the
approvals or applications required to implement the proposed development
have been denied by the applicable approval authority and, where applicable, the relevant appeal body, or have lapsed or been withdrawn.
b. Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where a significant drinking water
threat activity is directly related to a land use permitted by existing zoning and
does not require any approvals under the Planning Act or Ontario Building
Code Act to be lawfully established on a property, such activity shall be
considered existing for the purposes of compliance with the applicable
significant drinking water threat policies. This provision shall cease to apply at
such time as a Risk Management Inspector has conducted a property specific
assessment and documented the significant drinking water threat activities
that are undertaken or established on a property as of that point in time,
following which any significant drinking water threat activity not so
documented shall be considered new or future.
c. Notwithstanding the definition of existing, where a significant drinking water
threat activity is being proposed by way of a new or amended Prescribed
Instrument, it shall be considered existing for the purposes of complying with
the applicable significant drinking water threat policies provided that the
application for the new or amended Prescribed Instrument was deemed to be
complete by the applicable approval authority as of the date this Source
Protection Plan takes effect. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.3 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 all land uses identified within the County Official Plan and/or Area Municipal Zoning By-Laws, with the exception of residential uses, that are located within an area where sections 57 and/or 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 applies (Well Head Protection Areas (WHPA) A, B or C), are hereby designated for the purposes of section 59 (Restricted Land Uses). Within these designated land use categories and areas, a notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act, 2006 shall be required prior to approval of any Planning Act or Building Permit application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is not designated for the purposes of section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as applicable, is satisfied that:
- the application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and
- the applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
|
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.5 |
The County, in collaboration with Conservation Authorities and other bodies wherever possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs directed at any, or all, significant drinking water threats, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the County and subject to available funding. Such programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of significant drinking water threats and promotion of best management practices. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-1.6 |
The County, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Conservation Authorities and other bodies wherever possible, may develop and implement incentive programs directed at various significant drinking water threats, where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the County and subject to available funding. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-10.1 |
For the existing or future application of pesticide to land where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-11.1 |
For any existing facility for the handling and storage of pesticides where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-11.2 |
For any new handling and storage of pesticide, where the total mass of all materials stored that contain a pesticide prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006, in any form, including liquid or solid, is more than 2500 kilograms, and where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-11.3 |
For any new handling and storage of pesticide threat circumstances not addressed by policy OC-CW-11.2, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-12.1 |
For any existing or new handling and storage of road salt, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-13.1 |
For any existing storage of snow, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-13.1-LP |
For any existing or new storage of snow at or above grade where the storage area is less than or equal to 1 hectare, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-13.2 |
For any new storage of snow, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-13.2-LP |
For any new storage of snow below grade, or for any new storage of snow at or
above grade where the storage area exceeds 1 hectare, where this activity would
be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of
Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this
activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-14.1 |
For existing handling and storage of fuel, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-14.2 |
For any new handling and storage of fuel, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat,
This activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Notwithstanding OC-CW-14.2a), any handling and storage of fuel required for back-up generators at municipal supply wells shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
|
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-15.1 |
For any existing or new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned exclusively for residential and/or environmental protection purposes in the Area Municipal Zoning By-Laws, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat,
a. The County, in collaboration with the Source Protection Authority, Area Municipalities, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, and/or other bodies wherever possible, shall develop and implement an education and outreach program directed at the owners and/or occupants of such properties to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. The program may include, but not necessarily be limited to, the provision of education material and information about the nature of the threat, how DNAPLs can be identified, handled and disposed of appropriately.
b. Notwithstanding OC-CW-15.1a), where the quantity and/or volume of DNAPLs handled or stored on a property exceeds that typical of household use, the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
|
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-15.2 |
For any existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned for any other use than residential and/or environmental protection in the Area Municipal Zoning By-Laws, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-15.3 |
For any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned for any other use than residential and/or environmental protection in the Area Municipal Zoning By-Laws and located within a WHPA-A or B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-15.3-CC |
For any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties
zoned for any other use than residential and/or environmental protection in the Area
Municipal Zoning By-Laws and located within a WHPA ‘A’, where this activity would be a
significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the
Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a
significant drinking water threat.
|
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-15.4 |
For any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned for any other use than residential and/or environmental protection in the Area Municipal Zoning By-Laws and located within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of less than ten (10), or a WHPA-C, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-15.4-CC |
For any new handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid, on properties zoned for any other use than residential and/or environmental protection in the Area
Municipal Zoning By-Laws and located within a WHPA ‘B’ or a WHPA ‘C’, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose
of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-16.1 |
For existing handling and storage of an organic solvent where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-16.2 |
For new handling and storage of an organic solvent, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-17.1 |
For a new airport where there could be runoff containing de-icing chemicals, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-18.1 |
For the existing or future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard, where these activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, they shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure these activities cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-2.2 |
For any existing waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is not subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-2.4 |
With the exception of the following waste disposal site threat subcategories: a. storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste; or b. storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste, where any new waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, that does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act and shall be prohibited to ensure the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-2.4-CC |
For any new waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the
Environmental Protection Act, that does not require an Environmental Compliance
Approval, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall
be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be
prohibited to ensure the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-2.5 |
Where a new waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act does not does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval and comprises one of the following waste disposal site threat subcategories:
a. storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste; or
b. storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste,
and where such waste disposal site would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to manage the activity such that it never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan may be based on Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks tools and requirements for such activities, as set out in the Environmental Protection Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
|
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-3.1 |
For any existing onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act, including expansions, modifications or replacements of such systems, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, or for any new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act that is required for a municipal water supply well, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the County shall implement an onsite sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required by the Ontario Building Code Act, to ensure these activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-3.1-CC |
For any
a. existing septic system or septic system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act, 1992, including expansions, modifications or replacements of such systems, or
b. new septic system or septic system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act, 1992, required for a municipal water supply well
where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the County shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required by the Ontario Building Code Act, 1992, to ensure these activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats.
|
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-4.1 |
For any new or existing application of agricultural source material to land within a WHPA-A, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-4.1-CC |
For any existing or new application of agricultural source material to land, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the
purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-4.2 |
For any new or existing application of agricultural source material to land outside of a WHPA-A, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official the authority to specify requirements for a Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a Risk Management Plan under section 61 of O. Reg 287/07. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-5.1 |
For any new storage of agricultural source material, where this activity would be a
significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57
of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never
becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-5.1-LP |
For any new storage of agricultural source material within a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of 10, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-5.2-CC |
For any existing storage of agricultural source material, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean
Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient
Management Act, 2002 but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. |
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-5.2-GR |
For any existing storage of agricultural source material, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official the authority to specify requirements for a Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a Risk Management Plan under section 61 of O. Reg 287/07. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-5.2-LP |
For any existing storage of agricultural source material or new storage of agricultural source material located within an ICA, but outside of a WHPA-A or a
WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of 10, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58
of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water
threat.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or Strategy under the Nutrient
Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official, particularly
where such activity is located within an ICA. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official the authority to specify requirements for a prescribed
instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O. Reg
287/07. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-8.1 |
For the existing or future application of commercial fertilizer to land, on properties zoned for any other use than residential, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-8.2 |
For the existing or future application of commercial fertilizer to land, on properties zoned as residential in the Area Municipal Zoning By- Laws, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, The County, in collaboration with the Source Protection Authority, Area Municipalities, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, and/or other bodies wherever possible, shall develop and implement an education and outreach program directed at the owners and/or occupants of such properties to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. The program may include, but not necessarily be limited to, the provision of education material and information about the nature of the threat and how commercial fertilizer can be applied appropriately. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-9.1 |
For any existing handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-9.1-LP |
For any existing handling and storage of commercial fertilizer; or for any new handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, where the total mass of all materials stored that contain the commercial fertilizer, in any form including liquid or solid, is less than or equal to 2,500 kilograms, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure this activity ceases to be or never
becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-9.2 |
For any new handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW-9.2-LP |
For any new handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, where the total mass of all materials stored that contain the commercial fertilizer, in any form including liquid
or solid, is greater than 2,500 kilograms, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the
Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-CW.3.1-LP |
For any existing septic system or septic system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act including expansions, modifications or replacements of such systems; or for any new septic system or septic system holding tank regulated under the Ontario
Building Code Act that is required for a municipal water supply well; or for any new septic system or septic system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act that is located within an ICA, but outside of a WHPA-A or a
WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of 10, where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the County shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required by the Ontario Building Code Act, to ensure these activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats.
|
Long Point |
Significant |
|
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-1.18 |
Any Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act that is created or amended or is used for the purposes of obtaining an exemption from a Risk Management Plan under section 61 of O. Reg. 287/07 shall incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, manage the activities they regulate such that those activities cease to be or never become, a significant drinking water threat. The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions, including the Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, such as Nutrient Management Plans. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-1.4 |
The County shall amend the Official Plan and the Area Municipalities shall amend their respective Zoning By-Laws to:
a. Identify the WHPAs and ICAs in which a significant drinking water threat could occur;
b. Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable
Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by policies in the Source Protection Plan;
c. Identify the significant drinking water threats that are prohibited through Prescribed Instruments, or Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 in
accordance with the significant drinking water threat specific policies contained in this Source Protection Plan;
d. Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the significant drinking water threat specific land use policies identified in this Source
Protection Plan; and
e. Incorporate a cross-reference indicating a planning application cannot be made unless it includes a notice issued by the Risk Management Official as
set out in Section 59(1) of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and Section 62 of O. Reg 287/07. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-1.4-CC |
The County shall amend the Official Plan and the Area Municipalities shall amend their respective Zoning By-Laws to:
a. Identify the WHPAs in which a significant drinking water threat could occur;
b. Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all
applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies;
c. Identify the significant drinking water threats that are prohibited through Prescribed Instruments, or Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 in accordance with the significant drinking water threat specific policies contained in this Source Protection Plan; and
d. Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the significant drinking water threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan. |
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-2.1 |
For any existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review, and where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-2.3 |
For any new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that requires an Environmental Compliance Approval, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process to ensure the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.2-CC |
For a new septic system or septic system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act, 1992, with the exception of a new septic system or septic system holding tank that is required for a municipal water supply well facility, the County shall amend their Official Plan and the Area Municipalities shall amend their respective Zoning By-laws to prohibit uses, buildings or structures requiring a new septic system or septic system holding tank in areas where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, to ensure they never become significant drinking water threats. For the purposes of this policy, upgrading, alteration, expansion or replacement of an existing septic system or septic system holding tank to an improved standard shall not be considered to be a new system |
Catfish Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.2-GR |
For a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank, with the exception of a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act that is required for a municipal water supply well, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Area Municipalities shall amend their respective Zoning By-laws to prohibit uses, buildings and/or structures that would require a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank to be located within such areas, to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.2-LP |
For a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act, with the exception of:
a. a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act that is required for a municipal water supply well; or
b. a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tanks regulated under the Ontario Building Code Act that is located within an ICA, but outside of a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of 10, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Area Municipalities shall amend their respective Zoning By-laws to prohibit uses, buildings and/or structures that would require a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank to be located within such areas, to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.3 |
For an existing onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act, where these activities are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review, and where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals, to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure these activities cease to be significant drinking water threats.
The terms and conditions should include, but not necessarily be limited to, requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years, annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority and the County on any required inspection or monitoring programs and upgrading of these onsite sewage systems to current standards, where necessary.
|
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.3-LP |
For an existing onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act; or
for any new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act that is located within an ICA, but outside of a WHPA-A or a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of 10, where these activities are, or would be, significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review, and where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals, to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure these activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats.
The terms and conditions should include, but not necessarily be limited to, requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years, annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority and the County on any required inspection or monitoring programs and upgrading of these onsite sewage systems to current standards, where necessary |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.4 |
For a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank requiring an Environmental Compliance Approval, in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment. Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.4-LP |
For a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank requiring an Environmental Compliance Approval, in accordance with the Ontario Water Resources Act that is located within a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of 10, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.5 |
For any existing sewage treatment plant effluent discharges or storage of sewage, where these activities are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review, and where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure these activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.5-LP |
For any existing sewage treatment plant effluent discharges, storage of sewage, combined sewer discharge to surface water, industrial effluent discharge or sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water, where these activities are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review, and where necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure these activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.6 |
For any new sewage treatment plant effluent discharge or storage of sewage, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.6-LP |
For any new sewage treatment plant effluent discharge or storage of sewage, combined sewer discharge to surface water, industrial effluent discharge or sewage treatment plant discharge to surface water, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.7 |
For any existing or new sanitary sewer and related pipes, where this activity is, or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval for this activity is prepared, or, where necessary, amended to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented ensure this activity ceases to be or will never become a significant drinking water threat. The terms and conditions may include, but not necessarily be limited to, requirements for regular maintenance and inspections by the holder of the Environmental Compliance Approval. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.8 |
For any existing stormwater management facility that discharges stormwater, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.8-LP |
For any existing stormwater management facility that discharges stormwater, or for any new storm water management facility that discharges storm water located within an ICA, where the drainage area associated with the storm water management facility is less than or equal to 100 hectares, where such activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat; the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.9 |
For any new stormwater management facility that would discharge stormwater where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-3.9-LP |
For any new stormwater management facility that would discharge stormwater where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, except for: a new storm water management facility that discharges storm water located within an ICA, where the drainage area associated with the storm water management facility is less than or equal to 100 hectares, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity through the Environmental Compliance Approvals process to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-6.1 |
For any existing or future application of non-agricultural source material to land where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs or the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as applicable, shall prohibit this activity through the Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan process, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or through the Environmental Compliance Approval process, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-7.1 |
For any existing facility for the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, or Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as applicable, shall review, and if necessary, amend the required Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or Environmental Compliance Approval, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure such Plans/Compliance Approvals incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-MC-7.2 |
For any new handling and storage of non-agricultural source material, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs or Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as applicable, shall prohibit this activity through the Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan process in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or through the Environmental Compliance Approval process in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act, to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-1.13-CC |
The Ministry of Environment should, collaboratively with the County develop a consultation process related to document sharing and consultation on the issuance and/or notification of prescribed instruments, which could be used to guide information exchange between the two agencies to protect municipal drinking water sources. |
Catfish Creek |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-1.14 |
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks should, collaboratively with the County develop a consultation process related to document sharing and consultation on the issuance and/or notification of Prescribed Instruments, which could be used to guide information exchange between the two agencies to protect municipal drinking water sources. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-1.14-CC |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting municipal drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a WHPA along highways, or railway lines,
The County is requested to incorporate the location of WHPAs into their emergency response plans in order to protect municipal drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways or rail lines.
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to the Spills Action Centre to assist them in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
|
Catfish Creek |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-1.15 |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting municipal drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a WHPA along highways, or railway lines,
a. The County is requested to incorporate the location of WHPAs into their emergency response plans in order to protect municipal drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways or rail lines.
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to the Spills Action Centre to assist them in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
|
Grand River, Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-1.15-CC |
The Ministry of Environment should consider providing sufficient staff and financial resources to ensure the effective implementation of ongoing programs to decommission abandoned water wells, in accordance with O. Reg. 903 of the Ontario Water Resources Act. |
Catfish Creek |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-1.16 |
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks should consider providing sufficient staff and financial resources to ensure the effective implementation of ongoing programs to decommission abandoned water wells, in accordance with O. Reg. 903 of the Ontario Water Resources Act. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-1.19 |
The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, and other creators/issuers of Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act, are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into such Prescribed Instruments to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River, Long Point |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-1.7 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and other provincial ministries shall consider providing, continued funding and support for incentive programs, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program, to assist in protecting existing and future drinking water sources and addressing significant drinking water threats. |
Catfish Creek, Grand River, Long Point |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-19.1 |
To reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources due to the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act within a WHPA-A and WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of 10, the Canada Energy Regulator, Ontario Energy Board and the pipeline proponent shall provide the Source Protection Authority and the County with the location of any new pipelines proposed within the Source Protection Region.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OC-NB-19.1-LP |
To ensure that the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the National Energy Board Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A and WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of 10, the National Energy Board, Ontario Energy Board, and the pipeline proponent shall provide the Source Protection Authority and the County with the location of any new pipelines proposed within the Source Protection Region.
The Source Protection Authority shall document in the annual report the number of new pipelines proposed within WHPAs, where they would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Long Point |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OS-1 |
Where the handling and storage of an organic solvent is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The handling and storage of an organic solvent is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future).
2) The handling and storage of an organic solvent is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing).
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
OS-2 |
The municipality shall deliver education and outreach materials and programs where the handling and storage of an organic solvent is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, targeted towards:
a) an individual for personal use to promote the use of non-toxic products and additional opportunities for participation in household hazardous waste disposal and to advise the owner/tenant about the actions to take to ensure that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat; and
b) industrial and commercial users to promote the use of alternatives to these chemicals (including non-toxic products), pollution prevention approaches, best management practices, and safe disposal; in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future).
Where education and outreach materials prepared by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks are available, the municipality shall deliver those materials.
Timeline:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OS-3 |
Where the handling and storage of an organic solvent is, or would be, a moderate or low drinking water threat, the municipality is encouraged to specify and promote best management practices for the handling and storage of organic solvent for ICI land uses in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS > 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-C (existing, future); or
WHPA-D (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 4.8 and >10) (existing, future); or
HVA (existing, future).
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OT-1 |
OT-1(1): Update local emergency response plans and/or spill contingency plans to address a potential spill along highways as defined in the Highway Traffic Act, shipping lanes, and railways. Emergency response plans must include:
a) The location of all applicable wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones;
b) Specific procedures for responding to a spill;
c) A communications protocol; and
d) The location of available spill response materials.
OT-1(2): Review and update the emergency response plans annually.
OT-1(3): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of the updates that occurred as a result of (1) and (2).
OT-1(4): Update their emergency response plans and/or spill contingency plans for highways as defined in the Highway Traffic Act, shipping lanes, and railways by:
a) Revising their notification protocol to directly notify all potentially affected water treatment plant operators;
b) Using available data and models to predict the extent and duration of contamination caused by the spill, and to help determine the parties to be notified; and
c) Ensure that information about the predicted extent and duration of contamination caused by the spill is communicated to all responsible parties who are responding to the spill (e.g., the originators of the spill, emergency response/clean-up personnel, municipal health departments, and water treatment plant operators)
OT-1(5): Conduct testing of their emergency response plans and/or spill contingency plans commencing within three years, followed by regular emergency response
preparedness exercises to address a potential spill (frequency and priority to be determined in consultation).
OT-1(6): Provide mapping of all vulnerable areas to the Spills Action Centre to assist in spill response.
OT-1(7):The following content is recommended to be included in the report required by policy G-2(2):
a) A summary of updates that occurred as a result of (4)
b) The results of testing response/contingency plans per (5); and
c) Confirmation of mapping being provided per (6).
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OT-2 |
Applicable Activities: Transport pathways 1 within Wellhead Protection Areas A, B, C and D, and Intake Protection Zones 1 and 2.
OT-2(1): Develop and initiate within two years an ongoing education and outreach program that is designed to inform the owners and operators of transport pathways about
the following:
a) The potential for the transport pathway to endanger the municipal water supply;
b) Best management practices for upgrading transport pathways to minimize the potential for impacts to the water supply; and,
c) For wells subject to Ontario Regulation 903 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, their legal obligations with respect to well construction, maintenance, and abandonment.
The education and outreach program can be harmonized with existing education and outreach programs, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program (ODWSP) or the Policy G-5 program, where this would result in an increase in efficiency or cost-effectiveness.
The municipality may enter into an agreement with a conservation authority or other third party that identifies the third party as the implementing body for this policy, and related reporting requirements.
OT-2(2): In a WHPA-A or IPZ-1, establish a bylaw prohibiting the approval of a proposal to engage in an activity that will result in the creation of a new transport pathway (including geothermal heating systems). 3
This bylaw must be established within one year.
OT-2(3): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of the activities undertaken as part of the education and outreach program;
b) A summary of any bylaws created to satisfy(2)
1. Transport pathway means a condition of land resulting from human activity that increases the vulnerability of a raw water supply of a drinking water system contained in
this Source Protection Plan. Transport pathways may include, but are not limited to, the following:
For groundwater systems:
Wells or boreholes;
Unused or abandoned wells;
Pits and quarries;
Mines;
Construction activities involving deep excavations (such as building foundations, basements, parking garages);
Underground storm sewer, sanitary sewer & water distribution system infrastructure
For surface water systems:
Storm drainage infrastructure (e.g.storm sewer lines,culverts, ditches); and Tile drains.
2 Ontario Regulation 287/07, Section 27(3): If a person applies to a municipality for approval of a proposal to engage in an activity in a WHPA or a surface water IPZ that may result in the creation of a new transport pathway or the modification of an existing transport pathway, the municipality shall give the source protection authority and the source protection committee notice of the proposal and shall include a description of the proposal, the identity of the person responsible for the proposal and a description of the approvals the person requires to engage in the proposed activity.
OT-2(4): The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) is strongly encouraged to undertake an updated risk-based analysis of the compliance program associated with the Wells Regulation 903 as amended, made under the Ontario Water Resources Act.
The program analysis should consider:
a) Increased MOECC field presence with well contractors;
b) Complaint response prioritization where the presence of a transport pathway would endanger sources of municipal drinking water; and
c) Focusing resources in areas where improperly constructed, maintained, or abandoned wells may increase the potential threat to municipal drinking water sources.
Action to implement this analysis should be initiated within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
OT-2(5): The ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies
and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of the program analysis completed under (4).
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OT-3 |
Applicable Activities: Education and Outreach for Drinking Water Systems not in the Terms of Reference
OT-3(1): Municipalities are encouraged to extend education and outreach programs into First Nations reserves.
OT-3(2): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include,but are not limited to:
a) A summary of any initiatives extended to First Nations reserves, and the outcomes of those initiatives. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OT-4 |
Applicable Activities: Climate change data collection
OT-4(1): Environment Canada ,the Ministry of the Environment, the Ministry of Natural Resources, municipalities, and conservation authorities are encouraged to collect climate change data on an ongoing basis with a focus on the potential impact of climate change on vulnerable areas and on the drinking water supplies within those areas.
OT-4(2): The Province of Ontario is encouraged to provide ongoing funding to local agencies to collect climate data to expand existing climate change data collection programs to include a focus on the potential effects on municipal drinking water systems in the Trent source protection areas.
OT-4(3): Report by February 1 each year to the applicable source protection authority providing details of any climate change data collection initiatives undertaken in (1) and (2) impacting the Trent source protection
areas for the preceding calendar year.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OT-5 |
Applicable Activities: Collaboration with other jurisdictions
OT-5(1): To raise the profile of the importance of Lake Ontario as a source of drinking water for residents of Ontario and to encourage collaboration on protecting our shared drinking water sources, the Ministry of the Environment is requested to reach out to conservation authorities, Environment Canada ,United States government agencies, and others to discuss the findings and policies arising from source protection planning.
OT-5(2): The Ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) Details of any collaboration opportunities related to Lake Ontario and source protection planning which impacts the Trent source protection areas for the preceding calendar year. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
OTHER-1 |
The Niagara Escarpment Commission is requested to initiate amendments to the Niagara Escarpment Plan (NEP), no later than in their next scheduled plan review cycle, to incorporate from the Source Protection Plans the relevant policies, restrictions and conditions into appropriate sections of the NEP, in order to protect existing and future drinking water sources in Source Protection Areas by ensuring activities cease to be or do not become significant drinking water threats.
Timeline:
T-16: The policy shall be initiated within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P-1 |
Applicable Activities: The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft that that is an existing significant drinking water threat or would be a future significant drinking water threat.
P-1(1): The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8.
P-1(2): Include appropriate design standards and management practices in the development of any future airport facilities.
P-1(3): Request and report on information from relevant airport authorities, operators, and Transport Canada by February 1 of each year where a future airport facility has been designed in the previous calendar year, to identify how the recommendations outlined in (2) were considered.
P-1(4): Where an airport is being considered, work with the airport operator, the deicing service provider, the air carriers using the airport, and the companies or individuals responsible for disposal of the used deicing fluid to ensure that the risk management plan recognizes and addresses concerns related to the drinking water supply. The risk management plan should be consistent with the Guidelines for Aircraft Ground Icing Operations (Transport Canada, 2005)1.
1 Transport Canada (2005) Guidelines for Aircraft Ground Icing
Operations - TP 14052 |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P-2000-062012-E-F |
The City of Timmins is required to ensure that the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws are updated no later than at the time of the review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P-3000-062012-E-F |
Education and Outreach Significant Threat Policies for Existing and Future Significant Threats
The goal of the policies set out below is to provide an education and outreach component for each of the existing and future significant threat policies.
This policy will provide education and outreach materials to all properties located in Intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2 to ensure that they are aware of these vulnerable areas and of the related significant threats and the associated policies. The Prescribed Drinking Water Threats and the policies to address the existing and future significant threats are listed in Table 6.1. The education and outreach component will raise awareness regarding significant drinking water threats and policies.
Table 6.1 Existing and Future Significant Threats and Policies
Threat # 1- The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act
Waste Disposal Site - Storage of hazardous waste at disposal sites;
Waste Disposal Site - PCB waste storage related to other PCB activities;
Waste Disposal Site - Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of a hazardous waste.
P01-1884-120413-E-F
Waste Disposal Sites - PCB waste storage related to landfills and transfer stations that would accept PCB waste
Application of untreated septage to land;
Storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines;
Waste disposal site - liquid industrial waste injection into a well;
Waste disposal site - landfilling (hazardous waste);
Waste disposal site - landfarming of petroleum refining waste;
Waste disposal site - landfilling (solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial);
Waste disposal site - landfilling (municipal waste);
P01-0000-120413-F
Threat # 2 - The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage
Sewage- Septic System
P02-1956-112713-E(SS)
Sewage- Septic System
P02-0000-112713-F(SS)
Sewage- Lift Station
P02-1958-012512-E(LS)
Sewage- Lift Station
P02-0000-012512-F(LS)
Sewage System Or Sewage Works - Sewage Treatment Plant Effluent Discharges (includes lagoons);
Sewage System Or Sewage Works - Combined Sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water;
Sewage system Or Sewage Works - Discharge of Untreated Stormwater from Stormwater Retention Pond;
Sewage system Or Sewage Works - Industrial Effluent Discharges;
Sewage System Or Sewage Works - Sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water;
Sewage System Or Sewage Works - Storage of Sewage (E.G. Treatment Plant Tanks);
Sewage System Or Sewage Works - Septic System Holding Tank
P02-0000-112713-F
Threat # 3- The application of agricultural source material to land and Threat # 4 - The storage of agricultural source material
P3,4-0000-062012-F
Threat # 4 - The storage of agricultural source material
P04-1962-062012-E
Threat # 6 - The application of non-agricultural source material to land Threat # 7 - The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
P6,7-0000-062012-F
Threat # 8 - The application of commercial fertilizer to land and
Threat # 9 - The Handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
P8,9-0000-062012-F
Threat # 10 - The application of pesticide to land
P10-0073-062012-E
Threat # 10 - The application of pesticide to land and
Threat # 11 - The handling and storage of pesticide
P10,11-0000-062012-F
Threat # 12 - The application of road salt
P12-0092-012512-E
Threat # 12 - The application of road salt and
Threat # 13 - The handling and storage of road salt
P12,13-0000-062012-F
Threat # 14 - The storage of snow
P14-0000-062012-F
Threat # 15 - The handling and storage of fuel
P15-0177-062012-E-F
Threat # 16 - The handling and storage of a Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid and Threat # 17 - The handling and storage of an organic solvent
P16,17-0000-062012-F
Threat # 18 - The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft
P18-0000-062012-F
Threat # 21-The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard. O. Reg. 385/08, s. 3
P21-1945-112713-E-F
This policy will establish an education and outreach component for each of the significant threats and associated policies listed above, so as to ensure that they cease to be, or never become, significant threats.
Existing and Future Education and Outreach Policy for Existing and Future Significant Threats: P-3000-062012-E-F
The Mattagami Region Conservation Authority and the City of Timmins shall:
establish an education and outreach program that will:
require an annual inventory of all properties located in Intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2;
require notification to all property owners in Intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2 that they are in a source water protection vulnerable area;
communicate the availability of mapping for the vulnerable areas to said property owners;
communicate the availability of applicable policies to said property owners;
provide educational materials and opportunities to explain to all businesses and residences in intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2 the importance of clean drinking water and how to work together to protect their drinking water from contamination.
The Mattagami Region Conservation Authority and the City of Timmins will implement this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P-4000-110718-E-F |
Restricted Land Use policies require municipalities to screen Planning Act applications and Ontario Building Code applications to determine if the proposed activities are subject to Section 57 (Prohibition ) or Section 58 (Risk Management Plans ) policies. This review process will help municipalities avoid inadvertently approving an application without first complying with Source Protection Plan policies. Restricted Land Use policies (through Section 59 of the Clean Water Act ) reference the land use types and vulnerable areas where applications need to be screened. If an application is submitted for an activity that is prohibited by this Plan, then the application cannot proceed. If an application is submitted for an activity that is subject to a Risk Management Plan, then the proponent must work with the Risk Management Official to establish a Risk Management Plan before the application can proceed.
All land uses, (except residential) identified within the City of Timmins Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws are designated for the purpose of Section 59 (Restricted Land Use) of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas (Intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2) where the following activities are or would be a significant threat:
• the establishment, operation and maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environment Protection Act;
• the application of agricultural source material to land;
• the handling and storage of agricultural source material;
• the application of commercial fertilizer to land;
• the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer;
• the application of pesticide to land;
• the handling and storage of pesticides;
• the application of road salt;
• the handling of storage of road salt;
• the storage of snow;
• the handling and storage of fuel;
• the handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids;
• the handling and storage organic solvents;
• the management of runoff containing chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft;
• the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written directions specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is not designated (for the purpose of Section 59). Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Ontario Building Code is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as applicable, is satisfied that two conditions are met:
1. The application complies with the written directions issued by the Risk Management Official; and
2. The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 (Prohibition) or Section 58 (Risk Management Plans) of the Clean Water Act will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
The City of Timmins/Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy once the updated Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P-8,9-0000-062012-F |
The application of commercial fertilizer to land, and the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat would be significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plans shall:
require that the application of commercial fertilizer to land and the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, be properly managed in accordance to applicable legislation, while considering standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P.12.1 |
In accordance with Section 59(1) of the Clean Water Act, all land uses set out within the official plans or zoning by-laws for the municipalities where this Source Protection Plan is in effect, are designated as restricted land uses in all areas where designated threats are or would be significant. In effect, a person shall not construct or change the use of a building in any location, or make an application under the Planning Act or Condominium Act where Section 57 (Prohibition) or Section 58 (Risk Management Plan) applies unless the risk management official issues a notice under s. 59 to the person.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the circumstances under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site-specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or Condominium Act, or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as the case may be, is satisfied that:
• The application complies with the circumstances specified in the written direction from the Risk Management Official; and
• The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
|
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P.12.13 |
In this source protection plan, some drinking water threat activities are addressed by prohibiting ""future ; threats and managing ""existing ; threats.
This includes:
* Part IV - a ""future ; occurrence of a threat activity designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act and therefore prohibited while its ""existing ; occurrence is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act and therefore requires a risk management plan.
* Prescribed Instruments - a ""future ; occurrence of a drinking water threat is prohibited while ""existing ; occurrences are managed.
* Land Use Planning - ""future ; drinking water threats are prohibited through decisions on planning matters, while other policy approaches, such as a specify action or an education and outreach policy, are used to manage the same ""existing ; drinking water threats.
Where a policy in this plan refers to an ""existing ; threat, it is generally understood to mean an activity that commenced on a day before the source protection plan comes into effect. A ""future ; threat activity is generally understood to mean an activity that commences on a day on or after the day the source protection plan comes into effect. However, despite these definitions, in order to be fair to bona fide applications in process and to recognize approvals obtained, it is important to allow certain ""future ; prohibited activities to be treated as ""existing ; activities and therefore subject to the policies that apply to ""existing ; activities.
Where a policy in this Plan prohibits a ""future ; threat activity, the policy for managing ""existing ; drinking water threat activities applies in the following cases even though those activities will commence after the source protection plan comes into effect:
* A drinking water threat activity that is related to a development proposal where an application was made or an approval was obtained under the Planning Act or Condominium Act on a day before the source protection plan comes into effect. The policy for ""existing ; drinking water threats also applies to any further applications required under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, or prescribed instruments, to implement the development proposal.
* A drinking water threat activity that is related to an application made under the Building code Act on a day before the source protection plan comes into effect.
* A drinking water threat activity that is related to an application made for the issuance or amendment of a prescribed instrument on a day before the source protection plan comes into effect. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P.12.2 |
For the purpose of section 58(3) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the date the policies regarding regulated activities comes into full force and effect is five years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P.12.3 |
For the purpose of section 59(1) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the date for the policies regarding restricted land uses to come into full force and effect is the same date that the Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P.12.4 |
For the purpose of section 43(2) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the deadline for amendments to prescribed instruments is three years from the date that the Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P.12.5 |
For the purpose of section 40(2) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the municipal land use documents for the following municipalities must be amended to conform to the significant threat policies within five years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into full force and effect:
County of Bruce
County of Huron
County of Perth
County of Wellington
Huron-Kinloss
Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh
Central Huron
Huron East
Morris-Turnberry
North Huron
North Perth
Minto
Bluewater |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
P.12.6 |
If no time period is set out below or no time period is specified within a policy, the policy comes into full force and effect immediately upon the date Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change that this Source Protection Plan takes effect, and therefore, must be complied with from that date forward. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P00-012512-SAP1 |
The Mattagami Region Source Protection Committee recommends the following strategic action policy regarding the application of road salt in Intake Protection Zone 2.
It is recommended that the City of Timmins should include the application of road salt in Intake Protection Zone 2 within the Salt Management Plan.
It is recommended that the City of Timmins should consider implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P00-012512-SAP2 |
It is recommended that the Mattagami Region Conservation Authority, in partnership with the City of Timmins, should establish an education and outreach program to advise fuel distributors, private fuel outlets and property owners in Intake Protection Zone 2, what to do and who to contact in case of a spill. The program should also educate these bodies about the vulnerable areas and adherence to basic filling precautions and encourage partnership for mutual aid in case of a spill.
It is recommended that the Mattagami Region Conservation Authority and the City of Timmins should consider implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Moderate |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P00-012512-SAP3 |
It is recommended that the City of Timmins should, if necessary, update the emergency response and spill contingency plan to address the transportation of dangerous goods within Intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2.
It is recommended that alternate routes should be explored. The preferred route would be situated such that it is isolated geographically from the City of Timmins drinking water supply.
It is recommended that the City of Timmins should consider implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P00-012512-SAP4 |
The Mattagami Region Source Protection Committee recommends that the Mattagami Region Conservation Authority, in conjunction with other watershed water management agencies, develop and implement a water management education and outreach program. Although the main focus will be on the protection of the City of Timmins' municipal drinking water source, the program would also address broader water conservation, protection and management concepts.
It is recommended that the Mattagami Region Conservation Authority should develop and implement, in conjunction with the City of Timmins, the Porcupine Health Unit and other watershed partners, a water management education and outreach program, designed to inform watershed residents of the principles and importance of drinking water source protection and water management in general. Such a Program would include:
informing and encouraging all landowners on adopting Best Management Practices that deal with water quality and quantity issues;
utilizing such educational tools as information brochures, a dedicated website, special events such as a Children's Water Festival, etc. to promote the water management message.
It is recommended that the Mattagami Region Conservation Authority should consider implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P00-062012-SAP5 |
It is recommended that the Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines should:
consider this policy and work with mining companies to ensure that mine sites in Ontario are closed out within the regulatory framework of the Mining Act and in a manner consistent with sound environmental and public safety closure designs and to limit accrual of public risk and liability;
consider this policy when undertaking the review and filing of new certified mine closure plans.
it is recommended that the Ministry of Energy, Northern Development and Mines should consider implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P01-0000-120413-F |
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant, for the following threat sub-category:
- waste disposal site - PCB waste storage related to landfills and transfer stations that would accept PCB wastes.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For all properties where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act is in an area where the threat would be significant, for the following threat sub-categories:
application of untreated septage to land;
storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines;
waste disposal site - liquid industrial waste injection into a well;
waste disposal site - landfilling (hazardous waste);
waste disposal site - landfarming of petroleum refining waste;
waste disposal site - landfilling (solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial);
waste disposal site - landfilling (municipal waste);
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the waste disposal includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the waste disposal never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks will implement this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P01-1884-120413-E-F |
The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat is or would be significant, for the following threat sub-categories:
storage of hazardous waste at disposal sites;
PCB waste storage related to other PCB activities;
storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of a hazardous waste.
Site specific Risk Management Plans shall:
- require that the wastes produced on the property be properly managed and stored in accordance to applicable legislation, standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P02-0000-012512-F(LS) |
The City of Timmins shall:
through their Offical Plan and bylaws prohibit new sewage lift stations in Intake Protection Zone 1.
|
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P02-0000-112713-F |
Future development requiring approval under Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, for sewage systems or sewage works related to:
sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons);
combined sewer discharge from a storm water outlet to surface water;
sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water;
will be prohibited in Intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2, where this activity would be a significant threat.
Future development requiring approval under Section 53 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, for the following threat sub-categories:
discharge of untreated storm water from storm water retention ponds;
industrial effluent discharges;
storage of sewage (e.g. treatment plant tanks);
septic system holding tank;
will be managed in Intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2, where this activity would be a significant threat.
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks will implement this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P02-0000-112713-F(SS) |
For future development on all properties located in Intake Protection Zone 1, for septic systems with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 litres, the Porcupine Health Unit shall implement and administer the mandatory on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program.
The Porcupine Health Unit is responsible for implementing this policy within five years of January 1, 2011 or by January 1, 2016 as required by the Building Code Act.
For future development requiring approval under the Ontario Water Resources Act, septic systems with a design flow of greater than 10,000 litres per day will be prohibited in Intake Protection Zone 1, where this activity would be a significant threat. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P02-1956-112713-E(SS) |
For all properties located in Intake Protection Zone 1, the Porcupine Health Unit shall:
implement and administer the mandatory on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program as required under the Building Code Act and the inspection protocol published by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing;
inspections should be prioritized based on the proximity to the vulnerable area, the age of the septic system and any previous history of failing septic systems in Intake Protection Zone 1;
upon re-inspection, provide the landowners of the subject properties in Intake Protection Zone 1 with appropriate documentation regarding the operation and maintenance of septic systems.
if a septic system is found to be failing or failed, remediation as prescribed in the Building Code Act will apply.
The Porcupine Health Unit is responsible for implementing this policy within five years of January 1, 2011 or by January 1, 2016 as required by the Building Code Act. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P02-1958-012512-E(LS) |
For all properties located in Intake Protection Zone 1 that have systems, which include lift stations that transport human waste, the City of Timmins shall:
require facilities with sewage lift stations to have stand-by pumps and stand-by power supplies and/or approved contingency measures;
the facility must also have a monitoring/alarm system to advise the Owner/Operator in event of the failure of the equipment.
The City of Timmins is responsible for implementing this policy within two years of when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Mattagami |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P04-1962-062012-E |
The storage of agricultural source material is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat is significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plans shall:
- require that the nutrients produced on the property be properly managed and stored in accordance to applicable legislation, standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices;
- ensure that the storage of agricultural source material follows the setbacks outlined in the Nutrient Management Act, Part V111, Section 63, as amended from time to time.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy within two years of when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P10,11-0000-062012-F |
The application of pesticide to land and the handling and storage of pesticide is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat would be significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plan(s) shall require:
that the application of pesticide to land and the handling and storage of pesticide adheres to applicable legislation, while considering standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P10-0073-062012?E |
The application of pesticide to land is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where this is an existing Significant Threat.
Site specific Risk Management Plan(s) shall require:
that the application of pesticide adheres to applicable legislation, standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices;
that the Risk Management Plan associated with a golf course, include, at a minimum, the requirements of the Integrated Pest Management Council of Canada and its compliance with sections 18, 19, 20 and 21 of O.Reg 63/09 of the Pesticides Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended from time to time.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy requiring Section 58 Risk Management Plans be established for existing designated activities within two years of when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P12,13-0000-062012-F |
The application of road salt and the storage of road salt are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat would be significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plan(s) shall require: that the application of road salt and the storage of road salt adheres to applicable legislation, while considering standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official will implement this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P12-0092-012512-E |
The City of Timmins shall:
- implement Best Management Practices to manage the amount of road salt applied in Intake Protection Zone 1;
- prepare and implement an updated salt management plan, which will include a spill response component.
The City of Timmins is responsible for implementing this policy within two years of when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P14-0000-062012-F |
The storage of snow is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat would be significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plan(s) shall require:
- that the storage of snow adheres to applicable legislation, while considering standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official will implement this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P15-0177-062012-E-F |
The handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat is or would be significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plan(s) shall require:
- that the handling and storage of fuel of more than 2,500 litres on the subject property adheres to applicable legislation, while considering standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy, for existing threats within two years of when the updated Source Protection Plan takes effect, and for future threats when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P16,17-0000-062012-F |
The handling and storage of Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids in any quantity, and the handling and storage of an organic solvent in a quantity of more than 250 litres are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and are therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P18-0000-062012-F |
The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat would be significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plan(s) shall require:
- that the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft adheres to applicable legislation, standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P1EF-EO |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall inform applicable property owners that the application of glyphosate to land could be a significant threat in an IPZ-1 with a vulnerability score of 10. The education and outreach program will encourage property owners to avoid applying glyphosate and provide them with a list of safer alternatives. This education and outreach policy requires a one-time communication - it is not an ongoing, annual requirement.
Monitoring policy M16 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P21-1945-112713-E-F |
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat is or would be significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plan(s) shall:
- require that nutrients produced on the property, now or in the future, from the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard, be properly managed and stored in accordance to applicable legislation, while considering standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy, for existing threats within two years of when the Source Protection Plan takes effect, and for future threats when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P22-0000-051619-F |
The goal of the policies set out below is to address threats from the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipelines such that the threats never become significant threats.
To ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking threat, the conveyance of liquid hydrocarbons by way of pipelines within the current meaning of Ontario Regulation 210/01under the Technical Standards and Safety Act or that is subject to the National Energy Act, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA), National Energy Board (NEB) and the Ontario Energy Board (OEB) are encouraged to provide information on pipelines and ensure applications comply with appropriate design standards, monitoring and maintenance practices.
b. the City of Timmins and the Mattagami Region Source Protection Authority shall consult with the TSSA, NEB and the OEB to determine if there have been any applications or proposals for new proposed pipeline within Intake Protection Zone 1 and / or Intake Protection Zone 2, with a score of 9 or higher, and determine if appropriate design standards, monitoring and maintenance practices consider drinking water source protection.
It is recommended that the Technical Standards and Safety Authority, National Energy Board and the Ontario Energy Board should consider implementing this policy when the updated Source Protection Plan takes effect.
The City of Timmins and the Mattagami Region Source Protection Authority are responsible for implementing this policy when the updated Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P2EF-PI |
Where the application of pesticide to land could be a significant threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that permits issued under the Pesticide Act contain conditions that ensure that pesticide application ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. The MOE should consider including conditions regarding emergency response measures and spill contingency planning.
Monitoring policy M1 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P3,4-0000-062012-F |
For farms not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act, the application of agricultural source material to land, and the storage of agricultural source material are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring Risk Management Plans in areas where the threat would be significant.
Site specific Risk Management Plans shall:
- require that the application of agricultural source material to land and the storage of agricultural source material are in accordance to applicable legislation, while considering standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices.
The Risk Management Official is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P3EF-SA |
To ensure that the existing and future application of pesticide ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat, the City of Greater Sudbury shall undertake a pesticide management plan for municipal properties. This plan will evaluate the use (volume and application) of pesticides, reductions, and alternatives to their use where possible in the vulnerable areas where the activity could be a significant threat. This policy will come into effect within one year of the source protection plan taking effect.
Monitoring policy M9 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P4E-RMP |
The existing and future application of pesticide to land is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act requiring Risk Management Plans in the vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant threat. This policy applies only to application of the following pesticides:
MCPA (2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid)
MCPB (4-(4-chloro-2-methyphenoxy)butonoic acid)Mecoprop
Metalaxyl
Metolachlor or s-Metolachlor
Atrazine
Dicamba
Dichlorophenoxy Acetic Acid (D-2,4)
Dichloropropene-1, 3, to land
Pendimethalin, to land.
All land uses in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 restricted land uses under the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the application of pesticide to land (existing and future) could be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
P5E-RMP |
The existing handling and storage of pesticide is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act requiring Risk Management Plans in the vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant threat.
Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of pesticide could be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
P6,7-0000-062012-F |
For any future application of non-agricultural source material to land and/or the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material in Intake Protection Zone 1 and Intake Protection Zone 2, this policy shall:
require that a Non-Agricultural Source Material Plan be prepared by a person certified to do so under Part X of O.Reg. 267/03, as amended from time to time; and,
the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs shall review Non-Agricultural Source Material Plans for the application, handling and storage of non-agricultural source material that require approval by a Director under O.Reg. 267/03 for compliance with the Regulation and only approve those that are found to comply.
The Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs is responsible for implementing this policy when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mattagami |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
P6F-s57 |
The future handling and storage of pesticide is prohibited and therefore designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act where the activity would be a significant threat.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the future handling and storage of pesticide would be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PATH-1-NLB |
In addition to their role under the Building Code Act, the municipality is strongly encouraged to require additional measures to ensure that new earth energy systems within Wellhead Protection Areas do not endanger the raw water supply of a municipal drinking water system. The municipality should:
In Wellhead Protection Area ""A, ; prohibit the installation of all types of earth energy systems.
In Wellhead Protection Area ""B, ; require a qualified hydrogeologist to oversee* the design and installation of new earth energy projects (with the exception of horizontal, closed loop systems) to ensure that the construction of the system meets the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and will not result in contamination of groundwater. For a residential system, the hydrogeologist should assess the potential of encountering problems (such as multiple aquifers, cross-connection of aquifers of differing water quality, high yield formations, gas, salty water) and make recommendations to mitigate them including alterations to the design of the system.
Keep records of the location, size and other pertinent details of new earth energy systems within Wellhead Protection Areas.
Action to implement this policy should be initiated within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
* The Canadian Standards Association standard already requires that a commercial / institutional system be designed and inspected by a professional engineer and requires that a hydrogeologist undertake a site survey |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PATH-2-NLB |
The MOE is strongly encouraged to undertake an updated risk-based program analysis of the compliance program associated with the Wells Regulation [R.R.O., 1990 Regulation 903 (Wells) as amended, made under the Ontario Water Resources Act, R.S.O., 1990, c. O. 40].
The program analysis should consider:
Increased MOE field presence with well contractors
Complaint response prioritization where the presence of a transport pathway would endanger sources of municipal drinking water
Focussing resources in areas where improperly constructed, maintained or abandoned wells may increase the potential threat to municipal drinking water sources
Action to implement this policy should be initiated within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PATH-3-NLB |
The Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources is strongly encouraged to implement measures to ensure that new pits and quarries located within Wellhead Protection Areas do not endanger the raw water supply of a municipal drinking water system. Measures may include requiring proponents to conduct an assessment of potential impacts and if necessary develop plans to mitigate impacts and/or circulating proposals to the Ministry of the Environment or other agencies for review. Action to implement this policy should be initiated within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-1 |
No new waste disposal sites shall be permitted within the Port Colborne IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-10 |
Within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, Niagara Region shall implement an annual Outreach and Education program to the appropriate staff of the Niagara Region Transportation Division and the City of Port Colborne Operations Department.
The Outreach and Education program shall describe best management practices for handling and storage of road salt, since these activities could be existing or future significant threats within the Port Colborne IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-11 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation is requested not to permit the establishment of any new open salt storage greater than 5,000 tonnes or snow storage greater than 1 hectare in area on lands owned or controlled by it within the Port Colborne IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-12 |
In order to prevent stormwater runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft from becoming a significant threat in future, no new stormwater discharge from a national airport, that is a significant drinking water threat, shall be permitted within the Port Colborne IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-13 |
In order to prevent stormwater runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft from becoming a significant threat in the future, this activity is prohibited where it would be a significant threat, and therefore designated for the purpose of Section 57 (Prohibition) under the Clean Water Act. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-14 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation is requested not to permit the establishment of any new national airports on lands they own or control within the Port Colborne IPZ-1, in order to prevent stormwater runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft from becoming a significant threat in future.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-15 |
No new waste disposal sites for the application of untreated septage to land shall be permitted within the Port Colborne IPZ-2. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-16 |
Where an existing or future stormwater management system is in the Port Colborne IPZ-1 or IPZ-2 and the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the stormwater management system includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the stormwater management system:
a) Existing, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; or
b) Future, never becomes a significant drinking threat. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-17 |
Within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 Niagara Region and the City of Port Colborne shall ensure that stormwater runoff volume and pollutant loadings from future land development are reduced by:
(a) encouraging implementation of a treatment train approach and reliance on a hierarchy of source, lot-level, conveyance and end-of-pipe controls;
(b) encouraging the implementation of innovative stormwater management measures;
(c) allowing for flexibility in development standards to incorporate alternative community design and stormwater techniques, such as those related to site plan design, lot grading, ditches and curbing, road widths, road and driveway surfaces, and the use of open space as temporary detention ponds; and
(d) supporting implementation of source control programs, which are targeted to existing areas that lack adequate stormwater controls.
Municipalities shall require that an application for commercial or industrial development or the expansion, extension, or alteration of existing stormwater management facilities or the expansion of an existing commercial or industrial development within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 shall be accompanied by a stormwater management plan that demonstrates consistency with these stormwater management measures and any Best Management Practices identified in the stormwater Management Master Plan (PC-18).
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-18 |
In consideration of existing or future significant threats related to stormwater discharges, the City of Port Colborne shall, within five years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, prepare and implement a comprehensive stormwater management master plan for the catchments outletting to the Port Colborne IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. The stormwater management master plan will be prepared in accordance with the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment and will include:
(a) an evaluation of the cumulative environmental impact of stormwater from existing and planned development;
(b) a determination of the effectiveness of existing stormwater management works at reducing the negative impacts of stormwater on the environment;
(c) an examination of any stormwater retrofit opportunities that have already been identified for areas where stormwater is uncontrolled or inadequately controlled;
(d) the identification of additional stormwater management retrofit opportunities or improvements to existing stormwater management works that could improve the level of treatment;
(e) a description of existing or planned programs for regular maintenance of stormwater management works;
(f) an identification of the recommended approaches for stormwater management; and
(g) an implementation plan for the recommended approaches. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-19 |
In consideration of existing or future significant threats related to stormwater discharges within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 or IPZ-2, an Outreach and Education program shall be established by the Niagara Peninsula Conservation Authority (NPCA) that promotes good stewardship of water resources and stormwater management systems. The Outreach and Education program should target local industries and residents located within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. This Outreach and Education program may be implemented by NPCA in combination with other Outreach and Education programs at its discretion. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-2 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation is requested not to permit the establishment of any new waste disposal sites on lands owned or controlled by it within the Port Colborne IPZ-1.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-20 |
No new combined sewers, wastewater treatment facilities, or industrial effluent systems shall be permitted where they would be a significant threat within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 or IPZ-2.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-21 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation is requested not to permit new combined sewers, wastewater treatment facilities, or industrial effluent from facilities located on lands owned or controlled by it within the Port Colborne Intake IPZ-1 and IPZ-2.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-22 |
No new agricultural land uses are permitted within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-23 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation is requested not to permit new activities related to agricultural land uses on lands owned by it within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. (These activities include the application to land, and storage of agricultural source material; the application to land, and handling and storage of non-agricultural source material; and livestock grazing/pasturing, farm animal yards, and outdoor confinement areas.) |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-24 |
No new Category 3 Non-Agricultural Source Material application, or handling and storage, shall be permitted within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-25 |
Where the application of pesticide is an existing significant threat, or could be in future in the Port Colborne IPZ-1 or IPZ-2, this activity is designated for the purposes of Section 58 (risk management plans) of the Clean Water Act. All new and existing occurrences of this activity shall require a Risk Management Plan which shall contain appropriate risk management measures. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-26 |
All land uses except residential are designated for the purposes of Section 59 (restricted land uses) of the Clean Water Act in Port Colborne IPZ-1 or IPZ-2, where the application of pesticides would be an existing or future significant threat. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-27 |
Where the application of pesticide is an existing significant threat, or could be in future, within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 or IPZ-2, the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation is requested to ensure that persons engaged in these activities on its lands do so in a way that safely manages the activities, so they cease to be, or never become significant threats, and that those persons be appropriately licensed. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-28 |
In accordance with Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with the Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Intake Protection zones.
Niagara Region, in cooperation with the City of Port Colborne, will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the SPA. These signs should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within the Port Colborne IPZ-1 and IPZ-2.
This will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan by Niagara Region. This policy should be implemented within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-29 |
Niagara Region is encouraged to undertake an outreach and education program to promote best management practices for road salt application. Niagara Region may wish to combine this initiative with the outreach program described under Policy PC-10. (See also Footnote 1 for Table 4.11).
Table 4.11 Footnote 1: Road salt application is currently not a significant threat according to the Technical Rules under the Clean Water Act, because the impervious area for the IPZ-1 is not above 80%. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Low, Moderate |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-30 |
Niagara Region, and the City of Port Colborne shall update their Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) to include the following:
Maps that show the locations of the Port Colborne Water Treatment Plant intake and the areas where this policy applies. (Schedule PC3).
An up-to-date communications protocol showing the structure of command of the various agencies that would be contacted.
The ERPs should be updated within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-31 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC), and Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) Spills Action Centre (SAC) are requested to update their Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) to include the following:
- Maps that show the locations of the Port Colborne Water Treatment Plant intake, and the areas where this policy applies. (Schedule PC3).
- An up-to-date communications protocol showing the structure of command of the various agencies that would be contacted.
As it relates to railway corridors, Transport Canada is requested to ensure Emergency Response Plans under their jurisdiction are updated accordingly.
The ERP should be updated within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-32 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC) is requested to implement the following Risk Management Measures to address the potential impacts of a fuel spill on the raw water supply for the Port Colborne Water Treatment Plant:
- Require that persons handling fuel follow a protocol that uses best management practices to prevent spills from occurring.
- Ensure that spill containment booms can be readily deployed in the event of a fuel spill.
The risk management measures should be updated within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-5 |
The storage of pesticides in quantities greater than 2,500 kg is designated for the purposes of Section 58 (risk management plans) of the Clean Water Act, where this activity would be a significant threat in the Port Colborne IPZ-1.
All new and existing occurrences of this activity shall require a Risk Management Plan which shall contain appropriate risk management measures. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-6 |
All land uses except residential are designated for the purposes of Section 59 (restricted land uses) of the Clean Water Act in Port Colborne IPZ-1, where the storage of pesticides in quantities greater than 2,500 kg would be an existing or future significant threat. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-7 |
Where the storage of pesticides would be an existing or future threat within the Port Colborne IPZ-1, the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation is requested to ensure that persons engaged in these activities on its lands, do so in a way that safely manages the activities so they cease to be significant threats, and that those persons be appropriately licensed.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-8 |
No new open storage of road salt greater than 5,000 tonnes shall be permitted within the Port Colborne IPZ-1. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-9 |
No new storage of snow greater than 1 hectare in area shall be permitted within the Port Colborne IPZ-1.
|
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall take effect on the date set by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice;
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding restricted land uses shall come into effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the County and/or the Source Protection Authority to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
e. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Official Plan must be amended to conform with the significant threat policies within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect and the Zoning By-law within two (2) years from adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment; and,
g. Where the Source Protection Policies require a provincial ministry to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-1.17 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean
Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and
Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to
refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any
subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is
also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by the
Province or the municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-1.2 |
Despite the definition of existing, for the purposes of this Plan, where one or more of the following:
A complete application for development under the Planning Act or Condominium Act;
An application for Environmental Compliance Approval; or
An application for a Building Permit
has been received by the applicable implementing body prior to the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect a related significant drinking water threat is subject to the policies pertaining to existing significant drinking water threats. Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, the above noted transition policies shall no longer apply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-1.3 |
In accordance with Section 59(1) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Section 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice of approval from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit or Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a site specific proposed land uses that is the subject of an application for an approval under the Planning Act (as prescribed in O. Reg. 287/07 Section 62), or for a permit under the Building Code Act, is not designated for the purposes of Section 59 if the applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the planning authority or the chief building official, as the case may be, that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-1.5 |
The County and the Township of Perth East, in collaboration with Conservation
Authorities and other bodies wherever possible, may develop and implement
education and outreach programs directed at any, or all, significant drinking water
threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006, where such programs are
deemed necessary and/or appropriate by the County and subject to available
funding. Such programs may include, but not necessarily be limited to, increasing
awareness and understanding of significant drinking water threats and promotion of
best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-1.6 |
The County and the Township of Perth East, in collaboration with other bodies and
levels of government wherever possible, may develop and implement incentive
programs directed at various significant drinking water threat activities prescribed
under the Clean Water Act, 2006, where such programs are deemed necessary
and/or appropriate by the County and subject to available funding. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-10.1 |
To ensure the existing or new handling and storage of road salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-11.1 |
To ensure any existing purpose-designed snow storage facility ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-11.2 |
To ensure any new purpose-designed snow storage facility never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where such an activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-12.1 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of fuel of more than
250 Litres but not more than 2,500 Litres, where this activity is, or would be, a
significant drinking water threat ceases to be or never becomes a significant
drinking water threat,
a. The Township of Perth East shall develop and implement an education and
outreach program for property owners with identified fuel oil tanks, outlining
the requirements of owning a heating oil system including proper
maintenance and the steps to be taken if there is a spill or leak detected.
b. The Township of Perth East shall document as part of their annual report to
the Source Protection Authority the nature of any new education and
outreach program established regarding fuel oil tanks, the number of
persons contacted, and the location of the participants. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-12.2 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of liquid fuel, as defined in O.Reg. 217/01, of more than 2,500 Litres, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-12.3 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of liquid fuel, of more than 2,500 Litres never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat; this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited.
Notwithstanding this prohibition, fuel handling and storage required for emergency back-up generators within these vulnerable areas may be permitted subject to a Risk Management Plan in accordance with policy PC-CW-12.2. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-13.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional and agricultural purposes ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-13.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of a of dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial institutional and agricultural purposes in WHPA-A never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-13.3 |
To ensure the existing or new handling and storage of a of a dense non-aqueous
phase liquid for industrial, commercial institutional and agricultural purposes within a
WHPA-B or C, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat,
the Township of Perth East shall develop and implement an education and outreach
program to encourage business and industry to utilize alternative products, where
available and to use the proper disposal procedures for these products.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-14.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-14.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of an organic solvent never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-15.1 |
To ensure any new airport where there could be runoff containing de-icing chemicals, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-16.1 |
To ensure the existing or new use of land for livestock grazing, pasturing, farm animal yard or an outdoor confinement area, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-2.2 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of an existing or new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-3.1 |
To ensure future onsite sewage systems and onsite sewage system holding tanks never become significant drinking water threats, where such activities would be significant drinking water threats, the County and the Township shall amend its Official Plan to identify the significant drinking water threat areas and include direction that additional servicing constraints may be applied through municipal zoning bylaws. The uses, buildings and/or structures that would require a new onsite sewage system or onsite sewage system holding tank within identified significant drinking water threat areas and require those uses to be serviced by municipal services (Section 43(1)3.1 and 34(5) of the Planning Act) to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-4.1 |
To ensure the existing or new application and storage of agricultural source material on lands cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-5.2 |
To ensure any existing or new handling and storage of non-agricultural source material ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-6.1 |
To ensure the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer to land, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-7.1 |
To ensure the existing or new storage of commercial fertilizer ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore prohibited to ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-8.1 |
To ensure the existing or future application of pesticides within the meaning of Part I of the Pesticide Act, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-9.1 |
To ensure the existing handling and storage of pesticides within the meaning of Part I of the Pesticide Act, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-CW-9.2 |
To ensure any new handling and storage of pesticides within the meaning of Part I of the Pesticide Act, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-MC-1.4 |
The County and the Township of Perth East shall amend their Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws to:
- Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 would be significant;
- Indicate that within the areas identified, any land use that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies;
- Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-MC-2.1 |
To ensure establishment, operation or maintenance of an existing or new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-MC-3.2 |
To ensure the establishment of an existing or new onsite sewage system with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-MC-3.3 |
To ensure the establishment of an existing or new sewage treatment plant with effluent and/or bypass discharge or existing or new sewage treatment plant with sewage storage tanks cease to be or never become significant drinking water threat where these activities are, or would be significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-MC-3.4 |
To ensure existing or new sanitary sewers and related pipes cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will ensure that this activity ceases to be and/or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. The terms and conditions may include requirements for regular maintenance and inspections conducted by the proponent. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-MC-3.5 |
To ensure the establishment of an existing or new discharge from a stormwater management facility, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approval process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-MC-5.1 |
To ensure the existing or new application of non-agricultural source material on lands ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs or the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as appropriate, shall prohibit these activities through the Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan process, in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or through the Environmental Compliance Approval process, in accordance with the Environmental Protection Act. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PC-NB-1.15 |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a WHPA along highways, or railway lines,
a. The County is requested to incorporate the location of WHPAs into their emergency response plans in order to protect drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways or rail lines.
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-NB-1.16 |
To achieve the intent of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the County is requested to support ongoing programs which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903 within all vulnerable areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-NB-1.7 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support for incentive programs to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program and Rural Water Quality Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-NB-1.8 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from an existing activity, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Grand River Conservation Authority, in consultation with the County, will deliver available cost share incentive programs as long as the Grand River Conservation Authority has such programs and outreach staff available, and work with affected land owners to implement best management practices for the following activities:
The application of agricultural source material to land;
The storage of agricultural source material; and,
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PC-NB-17.1 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water due to the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act within a WHPA-A, the Canada Energy Regulator, Ontario Energy Board, and the pipeline proponent are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the County the location of any new proposed pipeline within the County and/or Source Protection Area.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PES-1 |
The application of pesticide to land is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8.1) (existing, future).
Without limiting other requirements, risk management plans shall incorporate appropriate agri-environmental best management practices and standards to ensure the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat.
Timelines:
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PES-2 |
Where the handling and storage of pesticide is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The handling and storage of pesticide is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in the following area:
WHPA-A (future); or
2) The handling and storage of pesticide is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future).
Without limiting other requirements, risk management plans shall incorporate appropriate agri-environmental best management practices and standards to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PES-3 |
Where the application, handling and storage of pesticide is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should develop education, training and outreach programs promoting integrated pest management and alternative pest control best management practices, particularly for farms, golf courses and sports fields where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8.1 for application; VS = 9 for handling and storage) (existing, future).
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PES-4 |
Where the application, handling and storage of pesticide is a significant drinking water threat, the municipality shall consider providing incentive programs to encourage best management practices for agricultural/rural landowners to reduce the risks to groundwater where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8.1 for application; VS = 9 for handling and storage) (existing).
Timeline:
T-11: Incentives shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PEST(App)-1 |
The existing and future application of pesticides to land is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, and shall require that pesticides be applied by a certified or registered professional in keeping with prescribed label rates to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
PEST(App)-2 |
OMAFRA and MOE are encouraged to review and, where appropriate, amend pest management training courses to incorporate additional precautions and considerations to address pesticide application in vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
PEST(H&S)-1 |
The existing handling and storage of pesticides is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards and include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
PEST(H&S)-2 |
Future handling and storage of pesticides is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
PEST-1 |
Where the application of pesticides to agricultural or commercial land could be a significant threat, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall ensure that permits issued under the Pesticide Act, 1990 and O. Reg. 63/09 (as amended) contain conditions which ensure that pesticide application is not, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat. It is recommended that the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change ensure permits take drinking water sources into account when including conditions regarding emergency response measures and spill contingency plans.
Instruments that exist before the day the Plan takes effect must be reviewed and, if necessary, amended within three years.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PEST-1-NLB |
The MOE is strongly encouraged to integrate source water protection information, such as the location of vulnerable drinking water areas, into the criteria used by program managers and inspectors to determine inspection priorities related to pesticide use in areas where the application, handling and storage of pesticide is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B. Action to implement this policy should be initiated within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PEST-2 |
The application, storage and handling of pesticides is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (Risk Management Plan) where this activity could be a significant drinking water threat and is not subject to the requirements of the Cosmetic Pesticide Ban or Pesticide Act, 1990. This includes application of pesticides for public health & safety, natural resource management, golf courses and sports fields, and the existing commercial handling and storage of pesticides. The Risk Management Plan should be based on appropriate environmental standards and/or the Ontario Pesticide Education Program and shall specify that only licensed operators can apply pesticides.
Emergency response measures to address spills and an emergency response plan shall be updated to include identification of the vulnerable areas and contact information for the operator of the drinking water system.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1, GENERAL-5 and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PEST-2-NLB |
The MOE is strongly encouraged to undertake a program analysis of the Ontario Pesticide Education Program and the Ontario Pesticide Training and Certification Program. The analysis should consider the need for training/certification to be required for all pesticide application, handling and storage that is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B. Action to implement this policy should be initiated within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PEST-3 |
The future commercial application, storage and handling of pesticides where they are manufactured or processed is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (prohibition) where this activity could be a significant drinking water threat.
This prohibition takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1 and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PEST-3-LB-PI-MC |
Where the application of pesticide (existing and/or future) is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the MOE shall ensure that the Prescribed Instrument that governs the activity (approvals issued under the Pesticides Act) includes appropriate terms and conditions so that:
a) The application of pesticide (existing) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; or
b) The application of pesticide (future) never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The MOE shall comply with part (a) of this policy within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PEST-4-LB-S58 |
The existing handling and storage of pesticides at a manufacturing, processing or wholesaling facility, retail outlet or custom applicator's storage yard is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is significant as described in Appendix B. The Risk Management Plans shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PEST-5-LB-S57 |
The future handling and storage of pesticide at a manufacturing. processing, or wholesaling facility, retail outlet, or custom applicator's storage yard is designated as prohibited under Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where the threat would be significant as described in Appendix B. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PL1EF-SA |
Where the conveyance of a liquid hydrocarbon by way of a pipeline within the meaning of the Ontario Regulation 210/01 under the Technical Standards and Safety Act, or that is subject to the National Energy Board Act is or could be a significant threat. Spill Prevention/Emergency Response Plan Pipeline owners/operators are encouraged to include the following drinking water source protection information in their spills response plan:
Mapping of vulnerable areas
Locations of municipal intakes
Actions to protect drinking water sources should an incident occur
Procedures for responding to a rupture
Notifying local water treatment plant operators in the event of a rupture
Include design, monitoring and maintenance practices that would prevent the pipeline from becoming a significant threat
Monitoring policy M21 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PL2F-SA |
Where the conveyance of a liquid hydrocarbon by way of a pipeline within the meaning of the Ontario Regulation 210/01 under the Technical Standards and Safety Act, or that is subject to the National Energy Board Act is or could be a significant threat. When the Canada Energy Regulator (CER) or Ontario Energy Board (OEB) receives an application for a pipeline through a vulnerable area where it could pose a significant threat the CER or OEB is encouraged to undertake the following actions:
Notify the Source Protection Authority and City of Greater Sudbury of pipeline location
Require consideration of vulnerable areas for the protection of drinking water sources in site selection encourage pipeline owners/operators to include design, monitoring and maintenance practices that would prevent the pipeline from becoming a significant threat
Monitoring policy M22 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PS-CW-7.1 |
To ensure that these activities cease to be significant drinking water threats, the following existing activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, in the Municipality of Central Elgin in the Elgin Area Primary Water Supply Intake Protection Zones within the areas identified in Schedule B where these activities are significant drinking water threats as per the threshold determined by the modeling, and therefore a Risk Management Plan SHALL be REQUIRED:
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer of greater than 5,000 cubic metres; and
The handling and storage of fuel greater than 6,000 litres.
At a minimum, the Risk Management Plans must recognize, to the satisfaction of the Risk Management Official, the following:
Site drainage;
Procedures and policies for handling and storage;
Regular inspection of storage tanks;
Reporting protocols;
Containment contingencies for failures; and
Any other terms deemed necessary.
|
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PS-CW-7.2 |
To ensure that these activities never become significant drinking water threats, the following future activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and therefore PROHIBITED in the Municipality of Central Elgin in the Elgin Area Primary Water Supply Intake Protection Zones within the areas identified in Schedule B where these activities would be significant drinking water threats as per the threshold determined by the modeling:
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer greater than 5,000 cubic metres; and
The handling and storage of fuel greater than 6,000 litres.
|
Kettle Creek |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PS-NB-8.1 |
As per Section 26(6) of O. Reg. 287/07, the Municipality of Central Elgin SHOULD PROVIDE mapping detailing the Intake Protection Zone (IPZ) 1 to the Canadian Coast Guard within one (1) year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
And further that the Elgin Area Primary Water Supply System Board and the Canadian Coast Guard be REQUESTED to work together to develop a protocol to report boating accidents within the Intake Protection Zone 1 (IPZ-1), Intake Protection Zone 2 (IPZ-2) and Intake Protection Zone 3 (IPZ-3) in a timely manner.
This action shall occur within five (5) years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Kettle Creek |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PST1 |
Where the application of pesticide to land could be a significant threat, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall not issue any permits under the Pesticide Act and O. Reg. 63/09 unless said permit contains conditions that ensure that pesticide application is not, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat. Instruments that exist when the Source Protection Plan (SP Plan) takes effect shall be reviewed within three years of the date the SP Plan takes effect and amended
as necessary. The Director, as defined in the Pesticides Act or its Regulations, may determine another implementation date based on a prioritized review of permits that govern significant drinking water threat
activities. This policy shall apply in the following vulnerable areas:
Callander IPZ-1 and 2;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
PST2 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Municipality shall prohibit the establishment of any land use involving the storage of pesticides that would pose a significant threat including retail sale, manufacturing,processing, and wholesaling. The Municipality's official plan and zoning by-law in effect for the vulnerable areas shall be reviewed and amended, as necessary, as required under Section 26 of the Planning Act, to implement this policy. The policy applies in the following vulnerable areas:
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1, with the
exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
PST3 |
Within three years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Municipality shall develop a pesticide management plan for municipal properties to ensure that the application or storage of pesticides does not pose a significant drinking water threat. This plan may provide direction to minimize the use (volume, area of application, application rate and frequency) of pesticides, target reductions and suggest alternatives to their use where possible.
The policy applies to the following vulnerable areas:
Callander IPZ-1 and 2;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
PST4 |
Where there could be a significant threat from the application of pesticides, the Municipality, in association with appropriate partners, shall plan and deliver an education and outreach program within one year of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. The program shall be designed to ensure those involved in the application of pesticides are aware of the risks posed to source water and how to reduce those risks. The program shall be made available and updated as necessary on an ongoing basis as is deemed appropriate by the Municipality. Further, the program may be delivered more broadly at the discretion of a municipal council. The policy shall apply in the following vulnerable areas:
Callander IPZ-1 and 2;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
Q-1 |
Applicable Activities: The management of agricultural source material (aquaculture) that is an existing significant drinking water threat. (This activity can only be a significant drinking water threat if undertaken within the Stirling Issue-Contributing Area).
Q-1: The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8. |
Crowe Valley, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
Q-2 |
Applicable Activities: The management of agricultural source material (aquaculture) that would be a future significant drinking water threat. (This activity can only be a significant drinking water threat if undertaken within the Stirling Issue-Contributing Area).
Q-2: The activity is prohibited and designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Crowe Valley, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R-1 |
Applicable Activities: The application of road salt is an existing significant drinking water threat or would be a future significant drinking water threat.
R-1(1): The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8.
R-1(2): Ensure that the risk management plan required by (1) includes provisions for the following:
a) Ensure that a salt management plan is in place that contains provisions to ensure that the activity is not a significant drinking water threat;
b) Where multiple road authorities operate within a vulnerable area, cross-boundary considerations will be addressed on an ongoing basis by all road authorities responsible for the application of road salt;
c) Where salt is applied by a contractor:
i) Ensure that contractors are made aware of the requirements of the Salt Management Plan; and
ii) Require the contractor to advise the municipality with responsibility for the drinking water system promptly if an alternate road salt product is used for
road maintenance.
d) Updating of the salt management plan within one year of the approval of an updated assessment report; and
e) Annual reporting on activities undertaken as part of the salt management plan to the Risk Management Official. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
R-2 |
Applicable Activities: The application of road salt is an existing significant drinking water threat or would be a future significant drinking water threat; and the application is being
undertaken by the Ministry of Transportation.
R-2(1): Ensure that efforts continue to identify and implement improved ways to pragmatically and logistically address the issue of salt contamination. These efforts will include the implementation of a salt management plan that contains provisions for mitigating the effects of road salt on wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones.
The salt management plan must include provisions for the following:
a) Where multiple road authorities operate within a vulnerable area, cross-boundary considerations will be addressed on an ongoing basis by all road authorities responsible for the application of road salt;
b) Where salt is applied by a contractor:
i) Ensure that contractors are made aware of the requirements of the salt management plan; and
ii) Require the contractor to advise the municipality with responsibility for the drinking water system if an alternate product is used for road maintenance.
c) Updating of the salt management plan within one year of the approval of an updated assessment report; and
d) Annual reporting on activities undertaken as part of the salt management plan to the source protection authority.
R-2(2): The ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of any changes to the salt management plan identified in (1) made in the preceding calendar year.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R-3 |
Applicable Activities: The application of road salt is an existing significant drinking water threat or would be a future significant drinking water threat.
R-3(1): Continue ongoing investigations and implementation of innovative practices and mitigative technologies regarding road salt application and the management of infiltration and runoff.
R-3(2): Actively consider the creation of a pilot project utilizing new practices and mitigative technologies for road salt application or the management of runoff that could benefit drinking water sources within
the Trent source protection areas.
R-3(3): The ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) The nature of relevant research initiatives as they arise; and
b) A summary of relevant research activities every five years.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R-4 |
Applicable Activities: The application of road salt that would be a future significant drinking water threat.
R-4(1): Consider the location of vulnerable areas during the planning and Environmental Assessment processes for the construction of roads, other impervious land surfaces used for vehicular traffic and parking, and all impervious pedestrian paths.
R-4(2): The ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority and the municipality.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of how (1) was achieved for any roads within their jurisdiction every five years.
R-4(3): Consider areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat as set out in impervious surface area mapping in the Trent Assessment Report during the planning processes for the construction of roads, other impervious land surfaces used for vehicular traffic and parking, and all impervious pedestrian paths.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
R-5 |
Applicable Activities: The handling and storage of road salt that is an existing significant drinking water threat.
R-5: The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Risk Management Plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R-6 |
Applicable Activities: The handling and storage of road salt that would be a future significant drinking water threat.
R-6: The activity is designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.1, A.1.1, C.1.1 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, municipal land use documents shall be amended to prohibit the creation of a new lot, unless that lot is serviced by municipal sanitary sewers or the on-site sewage system can be located outside of the area with a score of 10. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.2, A.1.2, C.1.2 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, future septic systems which are regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act and would be a significant drinking water threat will not be permitted. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.3, A.1.3, C.1.3 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, the lot size for any proposed development on existing ""lots of record; that would include a small on-site sewage system where it would be a significant drinking water threat, shall be based at a minimum on the most current version of the Ministry of the Environment's Guidelines for Individual On-site Sewage Systems. The hydrogeological assessment to determine appropriate development density shall be conducted by a professional, licensed to carry out that work (P.Geo. or P.Eng with training in hydrogeology). |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.4, A.1.1, C.1.1 |
For those areas within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10 where no municipal sanitary sewer exists and where systems already exist or where developable lots have been previously approved, all future or replacement private septic systems on lots where they would be a significant drinking water threat shall be located as far as practically possible from the wellhead while remaining in compliance of the Building Code. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.4, A.1.4, C.1.4 |
For those areas within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, and where existing and future on-site sewage systems are or would be a significant
drinking water threat, the Principal Authorities shall: implement the mandatory On-Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspection Program as required by, and in accordance with, the time frame set out in the Ontario Building Code. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.5, A.1.5, C.1.5 |
For those areas within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, each municipality shall require all properties directly abutting an existing municipal sanitary sewer to be connected to that sewer, and that any existing private septic systems on those lots which is a significant drinking water threat, be decommissioned to the satisfaction of the agency having jurisdiction over approval of septic systems, within the earlier of:
a) 3 years or,
b) within 2 years of the time of sale |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.6, A.1.6, C.1.6 |
Within three years of the Plan coming into effect, The Ontario Ministry of the Environment shall review and amend as required, all existing Environmental Compliance Approvals for those septic systems which are systems regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act, and are located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, and where they are a significant drinking water threat. The Environmental Compliance Approval shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will adequately manage the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.7, A.1.7, C.1.7 |
Municipalities in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA) shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for land owners who own or operate a septic system that is a significant drinking water threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. The education and outreach materials shall be developed and staff trained to deliver those materials within one year of the Plan coming into effect. Delivery of the outreach and education program should be initiated in conjunction with the septic inspection program that is mandatory under the Building Code. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.8, A.1.8, C.1.8 |
Upon the Plan coming into effect, all future Environmental Compliance Approvals issued by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment for new or replacement septic systems which are systems regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act, and which are proposed to be located within a highly vulnerable aquifer or significant groundwater recharge area where they would be a moderate or low drinking water threat, should include terms and conditions which when implemented will adequately manage the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. It is recommended that where the Director considers it appropriate, the following terms and conditions be included: require all new or replacement septic systems to be tertiary treatment systems. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.1.9, A.1.9, C.1.9 |
For those areas within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, and where existing and future on‐site sewage systems are or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Principal Authorities shall:
• implement the mandatory On‐Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspection Program as required by, and in accordance with, the time frame set out in the Ontario Building Code.
|
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.10.1, A.10.1, C.10.1 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, the storage of snow where it would be a significant drinking water threat (future) is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
a) the storage of snow in areas where the snow is stored either below grade and the area upon which it is stored is at least 0.01 hectares, or
b) stored above grade and the area upon which it is stored is more than 1 hectare. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.10.2, A.10.2, C.10.2 |
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, any existing storage of snow where it is a significant threat is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) the storage of snow in areas where the snow is stored either below grade and the area upon which it is stored is at least 0.01 hectares, or
b)storage is above grade and the area upon which it is stored is more than 1 hectare
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.2.1, A.2.1, C.2.1 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, the handling and storage of fuel, where it would be a significant drinking water threat (future), is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. This includes the following, for example, but not limited to (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
a) below grade or partially below grade storage of fuel where the quantity would be greater than 250 litres, or above grade storage or handling of fuel where the quantity would be greater than 2500. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.2.2, A.2.2, C.2.2 |
The following existing activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and require Risk Management Plans: the storage (for any period of time), or handling of fuel where it is a significant drinking water threat either entirely or partially within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, including, for example, but not limited to (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a.) below grade or partially below grade storage of fuel where the quantity is greater than 250 litres, or
b.) above grade storage or handling of fuel where the quantity is greater than 2500 litres.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a RMP with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect, including persons seeking a demolition permit as part of a proposal to remove a fuel oil heating system. The Risk Management Plan is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any), which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function, or that decommissioning occurs, in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. Risk Managements Plans should reflect current Ontario Regulations such as, but not limited to, the requirements of the Liquid Fuels Handling Code and/or the Fuel Oil Code. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.2.3, A.2.3, C.2.3 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities, in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction storing (for any period of time), or handling fuel where it is a significant drinking water threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. This includes, for example, but is not limited to (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a.) below grade or partially below grade storage of fuel where the quantity is greater than 250 litres, or
b.) above grade storage or handling of fuel where the quantity is greater than 2500 litres
The outreach and education program is intended to help inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.2.4, A.2.4, C.2.4 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities, in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), should implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction which handle or store fuel where it would be a moderate or low threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. The outreach and education program is intended to help inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.3.1, A.3.1, C.3.1 |
For those lands located within Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability score is 10, any operation of an outdoor confinement area where it would be a significant drinking water threat (future), is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.3.2, A.3.2, C.3.2 |
Section 57 Prohibition of Existing and Future Grazing, Pasturing and Outdoor Confinement Areas in WHPA-A
Within Wellhead Protection Area A, the following existing and future activities, where they are, or would be a significant drinking water threat, are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 as prohibited:
grazing or pasturing where greater than 1 nutrient unit per acre is or would be generated or
the operation of an outdoor confinement area.
As per Section 57 (2) of the Act, where this policy applies to existing activities, the prohibition of those activities shall not take effect until 180 days after the plan takes effect. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.3.3, A.3.3, C.3.3 |
Within Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability score is 10, grazing or pasturing that is or would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. Prescribed Instruments such as Nutrient Management Strategies or Nutrient Management Plans are expected to form the basis of the Risk Management Plan. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.3.4, A.3.4, C.3.4 |
Within Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability score is 10, the operation of an outdoor confinement area where it is a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water.
Prescribed Instruments such as Nutrient Management Strategies or Nutrient Management Plans are expected to form the basis of the Risk Management Plan. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.3.5, A.3.5, C.3.5 |
Within Wellhead Protection Area A, grazing and pasturing where less than 1 nutrient unit per acre is generated, and that is or would be a significant drinking water threat, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. Prescribed Instruments such as Nutrient Management Strategies or Nutrient Management Plans are expected to form the basis of the Risk Management Plan. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.3.6, A.3.6, C.3.6 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities, in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction who own, board or keep large animals where the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area, or a farm-animal yard could be a significant drinking water threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. The outreach and education program is intended to help inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.1, A.4.1, C.4.1 |
Unless otherwise stated, for those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, future sewage systems or sewage works where they would be a significant drinking water threat, will not be permitted. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
a) a stormwater management facility handling run-off from more than 100 ha. or
b) sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons) that discharges to land or surface water through a means other than a designed bypass or
c) a sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or a wastewater treatment facility. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.10, A.4.10, C.4.10 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities, in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all owners and operators of sewage systems or sewage works which are a significant drinking water threat.
Within a wellhead protection area with a vulnerability score of 10 this includes for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) a stormwater management facility handling run-off from more than 100 ha. or
b) sanitary sewers and related pipes that collect, store, transmit, treat or dispose of sewage but does not include any part of a facility that is a sewage storage tank or works used to carry out a designed bypass or
c) sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons) that discharges to land or surface water through a means other than a designed bypass or
d) a sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or a wastewater treatment facility.
Within a wellhead protection area with a vulnerability score of 8, this includes for example but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) a sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or wastewater treatment facility and where a spill may result in the release of vinyl chloride or a DNAPL that could degrade to a vinyl chloride.
The outreach and education program is intended to inform affected owners, and operators, of the potential risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.11, A.4.11, C.4.11 |
Wherever feasible, municipalities shall locate future sewage systems or sewage works that would be a significant drinking water threat outside of wellhead protection areas where the vulnerability score is 10. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
* (future)sanitary sewers and related pipes that collect, store, transmit, treat or dispose of sewage but does not include any part of a facility that is a sewage storage tank or works used to carry out a designed bypass. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.2, A.4.2, C.4.2 |
Unless otherwise stated, for those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, future sewage systems or sewage works where they would be a significant drinking water threat, and provided that they are not regulated under the Building Code and no Environmental Compliance Approval is required, are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
a) a stormwater management facility handling run-off from more than 100 ha. or
b) sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons) that discharges to land or surface water through a means other than a designed bypass or
c) a sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or a wastewater treatment facility. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.3, A.4.3, C.4.3 |
Despite policies, 4.1 and 4.2, all future Environmental Compliance Approvals issued by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment for future sewage systems or sewage works that would be a significant drinking water threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10 shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will adequately manage the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. This includes,
* sanitary sewers and related pipes that collect, store, transmit, treat or dispose of sewage but does not include any part of a facility that is a sewage storage tank or works used to carry out a designed bypass.
It is recommended that the MOE include the following condition: the proponent conduct camera inspections every 5 years. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.4, A.4.4, C.4.4 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 8, future sewage systems or sewage works where they would be a significant drinking water threat will not be permitted. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
* a below grade or partially below grade sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or wastewater treatment facility which is designed to discharge treated sanitary sewage at an average daily rate of more than 50,000 cubic metres and where a spill may result in the release of a vinyl chloride or a DNAPL that could degrade to a vinyl chloride. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.5, A.4.5, C.4.5 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 8, future sewage systems and sewage works where they would be a significant drinking water threat, and provided that they are not regulated under the Building Code and no Environmental Compliance Approval is required, are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
* a below grade or partially below grade sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or wastewater treatment facility which is designed to discharge treated sanitary sewage at an average daily rate of more than 50,000 cubic metres and where a spill may result in the release of a vinyl chloride or a DNAPL that could degrade to a vinyl chloride. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.6, A.4.6, C.4.6 |
Within three years of the Plan coming into effect the Ontario Ministry of the Environment shall review and amend as required all existing Environmental Compliance Approvals issued for sewage systems and sewage works where they are a significant drinking water threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) a stormwater management facility handling run-off from more than 100 ha. or
b) sanitary sewers and related pipes that collect, store, transmit, treat or dispose of sewage but does not include any part of a facility that is a sewage storage tank or works used to carry out a designed bypass or
c) sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons) that discharges to land or surface water through a means other than a designed bypass or
d) a sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or a wastewater treatment facility.
The Environmental Compliance Approval shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will adequately manage the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.7, A.4.7, C.4.7 |
Within three years of the Plan coming into effect the Ontario Ministry of the Environment shall review and amend as required, all existing Environmental Compliance Approvals issued for sewage systems and sewage works where they are a significant drinking water threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 8. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
* a below grade or partially below grade sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or wastewater treatment facility which is designed to discharge treated sanitary sewage at an average daily rate of more than 50,000 cubic metres and where a spill may result in the release of a vinyl chloride or a DNAPL that could degrade to a vinyl chloride.
The Environmental Compliance Approval shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will adequately manage the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.8, A.4.8, C.4.8 |
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, any existing sewage system or sewage works which is a significant drinking water threat, provided that it is not regulated under the Building Code and no Environmental Compliance Approval is required, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) a stormwater management facility handling run-off from more than 100 ha. or
b) sanitary sewers and related pipes that collect, store, transmit, treat or dispose of sewage but does not include any part of a facility that is a sewage storage tank or works used to carry out a designed bypass or
c) sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons) that discharges to land or surface water through a means other than a designed bypass or
d) a sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or a wastewater treatment facility.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.4.9, A.4.9, C.4.9 |
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 8, any existing sewage system or sewage works which is a significant drinking water threat, provided that it is not regulated under the Building Code and no Environmental Compliance Approval is required, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
* a below grade or partially below grade sewage treatment tank or sewage holding tank that is part of a wastewater collection facility or wastewater treatment facility which is designed to discharge treated sanitary sewage at an average daily rate of more than 50,000 cubic metres and where a spill may result in the release of a vinyl chloride or a DNAPL that could degrade to a vinyl chloride.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any), which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.5.1, A.5.1, C.5.1 |
For those lands within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, future waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which would be a significant drinking water threat will not be permitted. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) the application of septage to land (hauled sewage) or
b) the storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines when:
i. tailings are stored in a pit or
ii. tailings are stored in an above grade impoundment structure,
c) the landfarming of petroleum refining waste in areas that are more than 10 hectares or
d) the landfilling of: hazardous waste, liquid industrial waste, municipal waste, solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste or
e) the injection of liquid industrial waste into a well where the combined rate of discharge from all wells located at the site is more than 380 cubic metres per year or
f) PCB waste storage either below grade, partially below grade in a tank, or outdoors and not in an approved container or
g) the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste or
h) the storage of wastes as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste at a site that is not approved to accept hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.5.2, A.5.2, C.5.2 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, and where no Environmental Compliance Approval is required, future waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which would be a significant drinking water threat (future), are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
a) PCB waste storage either below grade, partially below grade in a tank, or outdoors and not in an approved container or
b) the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste, or
c) the storage of wastes as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste at a site that is not approved to accept hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.5.3, A.5.3, C.5.3 |
For those lands within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 8, future waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, which would be a significant drinking water threat, will not be permitted. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) landfilling of municipal waste or solid non-hazardous industrial/commercial waste where the fill area is greater than 10 hectares and results in the release of vinyl chloride or a DNAPL that could degrade to a vinyl chloride, or
b) liquid industrial waste injection into a well where the combined rate of discharge from all wells located at the site is greater than 38,000,000 cubic metres per year and results in the release of vinyl chloride or a DNAPL that could degrade to a vinyl chloride. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.5.4, A.5.4, C.5.4 |
Within three years of the Plan coming into effect, the Ontario Ministry of the Environment shall review and amend as required all existing Environmental Compliance Approvals issued for waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which are a significant drinking water threat within wellhead protection areas with a score of 10. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) The application of septage to land (hauled sewage), or
b) the storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines when:
i. tailings are stored in a pit, or
ii. tailings are stored in an above grade impoundment structure,
c) the landfarming of petroleum refining waste in areas that are more than 10 hectares or
d) the landfilling of: hazardous waste, liquid industrial waste, municipal waste, solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste, or
e) the injection of liquid industrial waste into a well where the combined rate of discharge from all wells located at the site is more than 380 cubic metres per year, or
f) PCB waste storage either below grade, partially below grade in a tank, or outdoors and not in an approved container, or
g) the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste, or
h) the storage of wastes as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste at a site that is not approved to accept hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste.
The Environmental Compliance Approval shall include terms and conditions which when implemented will adequately manage the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.5.5, A.5.5, C.5.5 |
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, and where no Environmental Compliance Approval is required, waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which are a significant drinking water threat, are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and require Risk Management Plans. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following:
a) PCB waste storage either below grade, partially below grade in a tank, or outdoors and not in an approved container or
b) the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste, or
c) the storage of wastes as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste at a site that is not approved to accept hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.5.6, A.5.6, C.5.6 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities, in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all owners and operators of waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act which are a significant drinking water threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) the application of septage to land (hauled sewage) or
b) the storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines when:
i. tailings are stored in a pit or
ii. tailings are stored in an above grade impoundment structure,
c) the landfarming of petroleum refining waste in areas that are more than 10 hectares or
d) the landfilling of: hazardous waste, liquid industrial waste, municipal waste, solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste or
e) the injection of liquid industrial waste into a well where the combined rate of discharge from all wells located at the site is more than 380 cubic metres per year or
f) PCB waste storage either below grade, partially below grade in a tank, or outdoors and not in an approved container or
g) the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste or
h) the storage of wastes as described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste at a site that is not approved to accept hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste.
The outreach and education program is intended to inform affected owners and operators of the potential risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.5.7, A.5.7, C.5.7 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA) shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners and operators of waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, which are a moderate or low drinking water threat, within wellhead protection areas with vulnerability scores of 8. The intent of the education and outreach program is to promote the proper disposal of hazardous waste. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.5.8, A.5.8, C.5.8 |
General Outreach Policy for Existing Waste Disposal Sites:
Upon the Plan coming into effect, where a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, which is a moderate or low drinking water threat, exists in a highly vulnerable aquifer or significant groundwater recharge area, the local Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) office, or the municipality in the event that the information has not been submitted to the MOE, is requested to alert the Source Protection Authority annually of any environmental problems or concerns at the respective sites. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.6.1, A.6.1, C.6.1 |
For those lands located within wellhead protection areas A, B and C, the handling and storage of DNAPLs in quantities greater than 25 litres, where it would be a significant drinking water threat activity, is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act as prohibited. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.6.2, A.6.2, C.6.2 |
For those lands located within wellhead protection areas A, B or C, the handling and storage of DNAPLs in quantities greater than 25 litres where it is a significant drinking water threat activity, is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any), which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.6.3, A.6.3, C.6.3 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction which handle or store DNAPLs within wellhead protection areas A, B or C, where they are a significant drinking water threat. The outreach and education program is intended to help inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.7.1, A.7.1, C.7.1 |
For those lands located within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, any storage of organic solvents where it would be a significant drinking water threat (future), is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, as prohibited. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances);
a) 25 litres, or more, of organic solvent stored either partially or entirely below grade, or
b) 250 litres, or more, of organic solvent stored entirely above grade. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.7.2, A.7.2, C.7.2 |
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, any existing storage of organic solvents where it is a significant drinking water threat is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) 25 litres, or more, of organic solvent is stored either partially or entirely below grade, or
b) 250 litres, or more, of organic solvent is stored entirely above grade.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.7.3, A.7.3, C.7.3 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction which store organic solvents where it is a significant drinking water threat within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. The outreach and education program is intended to help inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.8.1, A.8.1, C.8.1 |
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10 any existing and future road salt handling, storage or application where it is a significant drinking water threat is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) application of road salt where the impervious surface is greater than 80%
b) storage of road salt where the vulnerability score is 10 and the quantity stored is greater than 5,000 tonnes.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. Risk Management Plans are expected to be based on existing programs such as ""Smart About Salt ; for commercial properties and the ""Synthesis of Best Management Practices ; for municipal properties. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
R.8.2, A.8.2 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA) shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners within their jurisdiction engaged in road salt handling, storage or application where it is a significant drinking water threat, either entirely or partially within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) application of road salt where the impervious surface is greater than 80%
b) storage of road salt where the vulnerability score is 10 and the quantity stored is greater than 5,000 tonnes.
The outreach and education program is intended to help inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. The education program should be based on existing programs such as Smart About Salt.
* It should be noted that road salt application cannot become a significant threat to drinking water without an increase in the impervious surface area to 80% or more of the lands within wellhead protection areas (please refer to the explanatory document for further information). |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
R.9.1 |
Within one year of the Plan coming into effect, municipalities, in collaboration with the lead Source Protection Authority (SPA), shall implement an outreach and education program, developed by the lead SPA, for delivery to all landowners, within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10, and ASM, NASM, commercial fertilizer or pesticide is applied or stored where it is a significant drinking water threat. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) agricultural source material (ASM) in any quantity
b) non-agricultural source material (NASM) where either:
i. the storage is at or above grade and the mass of nitrogen is greater than 5 tonnes or
ii. the storage is in a permanent nutrient storage facility below grade or partially above grade where the mass of nitrogen is at least 0.5 tonnes or
iii. the NASM being stored contains material generated by a meat plant or
iv. the NASM being applied contains material generated by a meat plant or sewage works
v. the livestock density (according to livestock density mapping) is sufficient to annually apply the NASM at a rate greater than 1.0 nutrient unit per acre or
vi. the application area has a managed lands percentage of greater than 80%
c) commercial fertilizer where either:
i. it is stored for retail sale or application in quantities in excess of 2500kg or,
ii. the livestock density (according to livestock density mapping) is greater than 1 nutrient unit per acre or
iii. the percentage of managed land is greater than 80%
d) pesticides where either:
i. it is used for the purposes of extermination and is stored in quantities greater than 250 kg or
ii. it is applied on lands greater than 1 ha.
The outreach and education program is intended to inform affected landowners of risks to sources of local municipal drinking water and help identify means by which such risks can be minimized. |
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
REC-1 |
For applications under the Planning Act within the Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q2 identified as having significant water quantity threats, the relevant Planning Approval Authority shall ensure recharge reduction does not become a significant drinking water threat by:
1) Requiring new development and site alteration under the Planning Act to implement best management practices such as Low Impact Development (LID) with the goal to maintain predevelopment recharge. Implementation of best management practices is encouraged, but voluntary, for Agricultural Uses, Agriculture-related Uses, or On-farm Diversified Uses where the total impervious surface does not exceed 10 per cent of the lot.
2) Requiring that all site plan (excluding an application for one single family dwelling) and subdivision applications to facilitate major development (excluding development on lands down-gradient of municipal wells in the Toronto & Region Source Protection Area [Map 3.5]) for new residential, commercial, industrial and institutional uses provide a water balance assessment for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Planning Approval Authority which addresses each of the following requirements:
a) maintain pre-development recharge to the greatest extent feasible through best management practices such as LID, minimizing impervious surfaces, and lot level infiltration;
b) where pre-development recharge cannot be maintained on site, implement and maximize off-site recharge enhancement (within the same WHPA-Q2) to compensate for any predicted loss of recharge from the development; and
c) for new development (excluding a minor variance) within the WHPA-Q2 and within an Issue Contributing Area (for sodium, chloride or nitrates), the water balance assessment shall consider water quality when recommending best management practices and address how recharge will be maintained and water quality will be protected.
The Planning Approval Authority shall use its discretion to implement the requirements of this policy to the extent feasible and practicable given the specific circumstances of a site and off-site recharge opportunities.
3) Only approving settlement area expansions as part of a municipal comprehensive review where it has been demonstrated that recharge functions will be maintained on lands designated Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas within WHPA-Q2.
4) Amending municipal planning documents to reference most current Assessment Reports in regards to the Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas within WHPA-Q2. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
REC-2 |
When a Building Permit that is not subject to a site specific Planning Application (excluding lands zoned Low Density Residential) located within a Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q2, identified as having a significant risk level, an activity that reduces the recharge to an aquifer is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act as, requiring a risk management plan where the threat would be significant.
Without limiting other requirements, risk management plans shall require implementation of downspout disconnections and other best management practices to increase infiltration of clean water whenever modifications, additions or renovations are undertaken at existing properties or in new development with the goal of restoring or maintaining pre-development recharge.
Timelines:
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
REC-3 |
Within a Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q2 with a significant risk level, the municipality shall develop and implement actions to be taken and an implementation schedule, to ensure that an activity which reduces aquifer recharge ceases to be a significant water quantity threat.
Such actions may include:
a) reviewing options to maximize aquifer recharge;
b) delivering an education and outreach program to inform property owners about actions that can be taken to protect aquifer recharge (e.g., site grading, rain gardens). The program may include incentives (such as rebates) to encourage best management practices;
c) requiring the use of Low Impact Development in new development or retrofits; and
d) passing a by-law to require downspout disconnection.
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should provide municipalities with a list of appropriate education and outreach materials that provide information and guide to actions that can be taken to protect aquifer recharge for delivery by the municipality.
Timeline:
T-17: The policy shall be implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RLU-1 |
All land uses in the zoning by-laws within the Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching-Black River, Nottawasaga Valley and Severn Sound source protection areas are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, with the exception of residential uses, in all areas where the following activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat.
3. Application of agricultural source material to land
4. Handling and storage of agricultural source material
6. Application of non-agricultural source material
7. Handling and storage of non-agricultural source material
8. Application of commercial fertilizer to land
9. Handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
10. Application of pesticide to land
11. Handling and storage of pesticide
12. Application of road salt
13. Handling and storage of road salt
14. Storage of snow
15. Handling and storage of fuel
16. Handling and storage of DNAPLs
17. Handling and storage of organic solvents
21. Use of land as livestock grazing, or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area of farm animal yard.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site-specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site-specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as the case may be, is satisfied that:
a) The application complied with circumstances specified in the written direction from the Risk Management Official; and
b) The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
RV.1.CW-PA |
The following land uses are prohibited in WHPA-A:
1) Land uses which normally require waste disposal sites approval including:
* Application of hauled sewage to land;
* Mine tailings stored in a pit or in impoundment structures where the National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) notice requires a person to report;
* Landfarming of petroleum refining waste (more than ten hectares);
* Landfilling of hazardous waste (less than one hectare);
* Landfilling of municipal waste (less than one hectare);
* Land disposal of commercial or industrial waste (less than one hectare);
* Land disposal of liquid industrial waste
* Storage of PCBs; and
* A waste disposal site that is not approved to accept hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste but accepts small volumes that are exempt from Ontario Regulation 347.
2) Sewage treatment facilities, not including septic systems under 10,000 litres per day.
3) Non-residential uses where organic solvents occur including, but not limited to, dry cleaning operations, vehicle service centres, paint and hardware stores, retail or wholesale pharmaceutical storage and distribution centres.
4) Uses where fuel is stored including but not limited to, non-residential fuel storage, retail fuel outlets, uses where backup generators are required (with the exception of the backup generator at the Rosslyn Village Water Treatment Plant), industrial operations and any other uses involving the bulk handling and storage of fuel.
5) Uses which include the storage of DNAPLs except for incidental volumes for personal domestic use.
6) Future Agricultural uses.
7) The Official Plan and Zoning By-law shall be brought into conformity with provisions 1 to 6 in accordance with Section 26 of the Planning Act. |
Lakehead |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RV.3.CW-SP |
1) To address the handling and storage of road salt (existing and future) and storage of snow (existing and future) the Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge shall prepare a Salt Management Plan that takes into account the sensitivity of the Rosslyn Village WHPA-A within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. Specific actions that should be included in the plan to address the risk of road salt effects on source water include:
a) Locating salt and snow storage areas outside of the WHPA-A
b) Minimizing application of road salt within WHPA-A
2) The Thunder Bay District Health Unit shall ensure that on-site sewage maintenance inspections are conducted on all existing and future septic systems within WHPA-A, under the authority of the Building Code. This process will begin within 5 years of the approval of the Assessment Report for the Lakehead Source Protection Area (June 21, 2011).
3) Copies of any Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications in WHPA-A shall also be provided by the Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge to the Lakehead Source Protection Authority once they have been received for review and comment and shall provide copies of these amendments once they have been adopted. This procedure must be established within one (1) year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Lakehead |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RV.5.CW-EO |
1) To address septic systems under 10,000 litres a day (existing and future) the Thunder Bay District Health Unit shall provide within two years of the source protection plan taking effect, information to landowners whose properties are serviced by an on-site sewage system within WHPA- A. The information shall be made available for a minimum of two years and will include:
a) The reasons for the required inspection program.
b) Maintenance of systems.
c) Various types of allowed systems.
d) Best management practices for using a system
2) The Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge shall develop an education program regarding the potential harmful effects of plane de-icer within the WHPA-A. This material will be required in the event of an airport being proposed.
3) To address all agricultural related drinking water threats (existing and future - Agricultural Source Material, Non-Agricultural Source Material, commercial fertilizer, pesticide and livestock grazing or pasturing of land, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard) the Municipality of Oliver Paipoonge shall develop an education and awareness program to advise the landowner in WHPA-A whose property currently contains existing agricultural threats. The Municipality shall prepare a package that will include information for best management practices and to raise awareness of and reduce drinking water threats. This information shall be developed and distributed within 2 years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect.
4) The Municipality shall develop a package that will include information for best management practices and to raise awareness of and reduce drinking water threats related to the harmful effects of DNAPLs impacting groundwater resources. |
Lakehead |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the Clean Water Act, 2006, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of new drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date specified in the posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Bill of Rights Registry. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below and/or where established in individual policies, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set out by the Minister:
a. For Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan took effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 if:
i. an activity was engaged in at a particular location immediately before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect;
ii. the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location that, in the opinion of the Risk Management Official, policies regarding regulated activities should apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date of the notice.
c. For Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, policies regarding restricted land uses shall come into effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the development and implementation of education and outreach programs under section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006, and incentive programs and specified action policies for significant drinking water threats, such programs and actions shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-1.14 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the Specific
Circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Tables of
Drinking Water Threats, Clean Water Act, 2006;
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act, regulation, policy statement or guideline
(collectively “Act”) of the Ontario Government or Canadian Government is
referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted to refer to any
subsequent re-naming of sections in the Act, amendments to the Act, or
successor thereof. No provision of this Plan shall be interpreted to derogate
from any applicable law. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-1.20 |
The Area Municipality shall provide to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo any documents or records in possession or control of the municipality relating to soil and groundwater contamination on Condition Sites for the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability equals or is greater than eight (8); or
ii. Where there is a Trichloroethylene (TCE) Issue, in all Wellhead Protection Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-1.3 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, all land uses identified within the Regional Municipality of Waterloo Official Plan and the Area Municipal Official Plan and Area Municipal Zoning By-laws are designated as land uses to which the restricted land uses provisions of the Clean Water Act, 2006 apply where activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use, building or construction is not designated for the purposes of section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use, building or construction that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act, Condominium Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as applicable, is satisfied that:
a. The application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and
b. The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-1.5 |
To support the significant drinking water threat policies contained within this
Source Protection Plan, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, in collaboration
with other bodies and levels of government where possible including but not
limited to Area Municipalities, Grand River Conservation Authority and the
provincial and federal agencies and/or organizations, shall develop and
implement education and outreach programs. Where an existing education and
outreach program appropriately addresses the policies of this plan, the Regional
Municipality of Waterloo may use the existing program to fulfill the policy
requirements. Additional information on specific education and outreach programs
can be found in the policies in this Source Protection Plan. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-1.6 |
To support the significant drinking water threat policies contained within this
Source Protection Plan, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, in collaboration
with other bodies and levels of government, where possible, shall develop and
implement incentive programs applied to significant threats as identified in specific
policies in this Source Protection Plan in accordance with applicable legislation.
Where an existing incentive program appropriately addresses the policies of this
plan, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo may use the existing program to fulfill
the policy requirements. Where incentives are available and where Risk
Management Plans and/or Prescribed Instruments are identified for an existing
activity, the incentives may be used to implement required beneficial management
practices in accordance with applicable legislation. Specific incentive policies in
this Source Protection Plan are to adhere to the general approach stated in this
policy. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-12.1 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities are requested to update their Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities Design Guidelines and Supplemental Specifications for Municipal Services document within two (2) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect to require enhanced construction standards to ensure that the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A . |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-14 |
The Area Municipalities shall establish contingency plans for responding to spills for sanitary sewers and related pipes that are significant threats in the following areas:
i. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is less than six (6).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-19 |
The Area Municipalities, in collaboration with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks shall undertake an assessment of stormwater management facilities to determine appropriate scope and type of measures to protect drinking water sources within two (2) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect to ensure that this activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Chloride and/or Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-19.1 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities are requested to update their Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities Design Guidelines and Supplemental Specifications for Municipal Services document within two (2) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect to require enhanced inspection and testing standards to ensure that stormwater management facilities do not become a significant drinking water threat in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10)
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-20 |
To ensure the existing and future discharge from a stormwater management facility exempt from Environmental Compliance Approvals does not become or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat:
a. The future discharge from a stormwater management facility within vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
b. The discharge from a stormwater management facility shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required with the persons or agencies engaging or proposing to engage in the following areas:
a. Existing:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iv. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
v. Where a Nitrate and/or Chloride Issue has been identified, in all Issue contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A.
b. Future:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate and/or Chloride Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A.
The Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, water quality monitoring and reporting to the Risk Management Official. Where there is a Nitrate and/or Chloride Issue, the Risk Management Plan shall also include water quality monitoring for nitrate or chloride, respectively.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-20.1 |
To promote best management practices and to provide guidance about the importance of source water protection, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in the existing discharge of stormwater from a stormwater management facility exempt from Environmental Compliance Approvals in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iv. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
v. Where a Nitrate and/or Chloride Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-21 |
The existing and/or future application, temporary field storage or permanent storage of agricultural source material is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat:
a. Existing:
i. Temporary field storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Area One (1);
iii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
ii. Permanent storage;
i. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
iii. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
b. Future:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
ii. Temporary field storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate issue Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
iii. Permanent storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-23 |
To ensure that the existing and/or future application and permanent storage of agricultural source material on farms not phased–in under the Nutrient Management Act within vulnerable areas where these activities are or would be a significant drinking water threat do not become or cease to be a significant drinking water threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified in all Issue Contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
ii. Permanent Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
b. Future:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
ii. Permanent Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
For the application of agricultural source material, the Risk Management Plan should include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location are appropriate for crop uptake of nitrogen on an annual basis and that reduce potential for surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration.
For the permanent storage of agricultural source material, the Risk Management Plan should include, as a minimum, measures to reduce the likelihood of spills and leaks and contain and respond to the spills.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-24 |
To promote best management practices and to provide guidance about the importance of source water protection:
a. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in the activity of the existing application, temporary storage and/or permanent storage of agricultural source material on farms not phased in under the Nutrient Management Act in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to six (6).
b. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons engaging in the existing and new application and temporary and permanent storage of agricultural source material in the following areas:
i. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than six (6).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-28 |
To ensure the existing and/or future handling and storage of commercial fertilizer cease to be or do not become a significant drinking water threat where these activities are or would be a significant threat, these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities:
Existing:
Handling and Storage;
Future:
In Wellhead Protection Area A.
Handling and Storage;
In Wellhead Protection Area A.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-29 |
To ensure that existing and future application and handling and storage of commercial fertilizer do not become or cease to be a significant drinking water threat where these activities are or would be a significant threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to six (6).
ii. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B, where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
b. Future:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to six (6).
ii. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B, where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
For the application of commercial fertilizer, the Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location are appropriate for uptake of nitrogen on an annual basis and that reduce potential for surface water run-off and increase groundwater infiltration.
For the handling and storage of commercial fertilizer, the Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to reduce the likelihood of spills and leaks and contain and respond to spills. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-3 |
To ensure that the establishment, operation and maintenance of an new waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act and exempt from Environmental Compliance Approvals does not become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, landfilling of hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous, or Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) waste at landfills or transfer stations ;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Areas A, B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8) for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste;
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste; and storage of hazardous or, PCB waste at landfills or transfer stations;
iv. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to or greater than eight (8) for the application of hauled sewage to land;
v. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9) for the land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous waste at landfills or transfer stations ;
vi. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8) for the application of hauled sewage to land;
vii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than nine (9) for the application of land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous waste at landfills or transfer stations;
viii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas for landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste;
ix. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas for the application of hauled sewage;
x. Where a Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-30 |
To promote best management practices and to provide guidance about the importance of source water protection:
a. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in the activity of the existing application and storage of commercial fertilizer in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to six (6).
b. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons engaging in existing and new application and storage of commercial fertilizer in the following areas:
i. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas, where the vulnerability is less than six (6).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-31 |
To ensure the new application and handling and storage of pesticide does not become a significant drinking water threat, these activities are designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and are prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities:
Future:
Application, Handling and Storage;
In a Wellhead Protection Area A;
In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-32 |
To ensure that existing and/or future application and handling and storage of pesticides do not become or cease to be a significant drinking water threat where these activities are or would be a significant threat, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Areas B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iv. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8).
ii. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iv. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9)..
b. Future:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8).
ii. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-33 |
To promote best management practices and to provide guidance about the importance of source water protection:
a. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in the activity of the existing application and storage of pesticide in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8).
b. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons engaging in existing and new application and storage of pesticide in the following areas:
i. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-34 |
To ensure the new application of road salt does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity would be a significant threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities:
Future:
Application of salt on roadways related to the development of new roads that would occur as the result of the approval of a Planning Act or Condominium Act application;
In Wellhead Protection Area A;
In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
Application of salt on new parking lots that would occur as the result of the approval of a Planning Act, Condominium Act or Ontario Building Code application;
In Wellhead Protection Area A, for the large parking lots;
In Intake Protection Zone One (1) for medium and large parking lots.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-34.1 |
To ensure the existing and future handling and storage of road salt ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity is designated in accordance with Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for any uncovered storage of any amount and covered for amounts greater than or equal to one (1) tonne of salt or greater than or equal to one thousand (1000) liters of brine ;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1), for any uncovered storage of any amount and covered for amounts greater than or equal to one (1) tonne of salt or greater than or equal to one thousand (1000) liters of brine;
iii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas, for any uncovered storage of any amount.
b. Future:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for any uncovered storage of any amount and covered for amounts greater than or equal to one (1) tonne of salt or greater than or equal to one thousand (1000) liters of brine;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1) for any uncovered storage of any amount and covered for amounts greater than or equal to one (1) tonne of salt or greater than or equal to one thousand (1000) liters of brine;
iii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas for any uncovered storage of any amount.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-35 |
To ensure the existing and/or future application of road salt does not become or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required within the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Application of Salt on Roadways;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Chloride and/or a Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas
ii. Application on Parking Lots;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for medium or large parking lots;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1), for medium and large parking lots;
iii. Where a Chloride and/or a Sodium Issue has been identified in all Wellhead Protection Areas, for medium and large parking lots;
b. Future:
i. Application of Salt on Roadways that would occur as the result of the approval of a Planning Act, Condominium Act, or Ontario Building Code application or upon completion of an Environmental Assessment in accordance with the Environmental Assessment Act;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas except for Wellhead Protection Area A.
ii. Application on Parking Lots that would occur as the result of the approval of a Planning Act, Condominium Act or Ontario Building Code application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A, for medium parking lots;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for medium or large parking lots;
iii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas except for Wellhead Protection Area A for medium and large parking lots.
The Risk Management Plan for application of salt on large and medium parking lots shall contain, as a minimum, management practices that achieve a performance standard equivalent to that of an accredited site under the Smart About Salt program to reduce the impact of de-icing activities and for new parking lots include design considerations for driving areas and sidewalks to reduce impacts to drinking water sources.
The Risk Management Plan for application of salt on roadways shall include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location reduce the potential for surface water runoff and groundwater infiltration and meet the objectives of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for Environmental Management of Road Salts including identification of areas where significant threats can occur as Vulnerable Areas and management practices in these areas.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-35.1 |
To ensure that the storage of road salt does not become or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required within the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10) for covered storage in amounts less than one (1) tonne of salt or less than one thousand (1000) L of brine;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Areas B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for any uncovered storage of any amount and covered for amounts greater than or equal to one (1) tonne of salt or greater than or equal to one thousand (1000) liters of brine;
iii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A for covered storage in amounts greater than or equal to one (1) tonne of salt or greater than one thousand (1000) L of brine
b. Future:
i. Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10) for covered storage in amounts less than one (1) tonne of salt or less than one thousand (1000) L of brine;
ii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A for covered storage in amounts greater than or equal to one (1) tonne of salt or greater than one thousand (1000) L of brine.
The Risk Management Plan for the handling and storage of salt or brine shall contain, as a minimum, management practices that achieve a performance standard equivalent to that of an accredited site under the Smart About Salt program to reduce the impact of de-icing activities and for new parking lots include design considerations for roads and sidewalks to reduce the impact.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-37 |
To provide guidance about the importance of source water protection and to promote best management practices:
a. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in the following existing activities in the following areas:
i. Application of salt on large or medium-sized parking lots:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas.
ii. Storage of salt:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas for storage in amounts greater than or equal to one (1) tonne of salt or greater than one thousand (1000) liters of brine.
The incentive program shall encourage the implementation of the best management practices that form the core of the Smart About Salt program to reduce the impact of winter de-icing activities.
b. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons involved in the existing and new application and handling and storage of salt in the following areas:
i. Application of salt on large or medium-sized parking lots:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas.
ii. Storage of salt:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas.
iii. Application of salt on small parking lots and on roadways:
i. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
The education and outreach programs shall encourage the implementation of the best management practices that form the core of the Smart About Salt program to reduce the impact of winter de-icing activities.
c. The Area Municipalities, in conjunction with the Regional Municipality of Waterloo, shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons involved in the application and storage of salt in the following areas:
i. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas.
The education and outreach program shall include messages about best salt management practices to protect drinking water in their winter maintenance bylaw promotion.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-39 |
Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities shall review and, if necessary, revise their Salt Management Plans for the application of salt on roadways in all Wellhead Protection Areas. The Salt Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location reduce the potential for salt-related surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration and meet the objectives of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for Environmental Management of Road Salts including the salt vulnerable area mapping to include areas where significant threats can occur. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-4 |
To ensure that the operation and maintenance of an existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act and exempt from Environmental Compliance Approvals ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required, within the following vulnerable areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, the landfilling of hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous, Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) or liquid hazardous waste at landfills and transfer stations;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Areas A, B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to to eight (8) for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste;
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous, or PCB waste at landfills and transfer stations;
iv. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to or greater than eight (8) for the application of hauled sewage to land;
v. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9) for the land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous waste at landfills or transfer stations;
vi. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8) for the application of hauled sewage to land;
vii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than nine (9) for the land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous waste at landfills or transfer stations;
viii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas for landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste;
ix. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas for the application of hauled sewage;
x. Where a Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-41 |
To ensure the existing and/or future storage of snow ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, the activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) and Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9);
iv. Where a Chloride, Sodium and/or Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to six (6), with an area greater than or equal to 0.5 hectares.
b. Future:
i. Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) and Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9);
iv. Where a Chloride, Sodium and/or a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to six (6), with an area greater than or equal to 0.5 hectares.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-42 |
To ensure the existing and/or future storage of snow does not become or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Storage;
i. Where a Chloride, Sodium and/or Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6), with an area greater than or equal to 0.05 and less than 0.5 hectares.
b. Future:
i. Storage;
i. Where a Chloride, Sodium and/or Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6), with an area greater than or equal to 0.05 and less than 0.5 hectares.;
The Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to reduce risk based on an assessment of criteria in the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks implementation of Guideline B-4 (Snow Disposal and De-icing Operations in Ontario 2011) including measures that minimize the impact of surface and sub surface drainage in selection of suitable sites for disposal.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-43 |
To provide guidance about the importance of source water protection and to promote best management practices;
a. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons involved in existing storage of snow in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Chloride, Sodium and/or Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
b. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons involved in existing and future storage of snow in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Chloride, Sodium and/or Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
The education and outreach program should encourage the use of beneficial management practices that ensure that the activity does not become or ceases to be a threat to drinking water. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-45 |
To ensure the existing and/or new handling and storage of a fuel ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities except where used in a single detached dwelling:
a. Existing:
i. Below Grade Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A, for liquid fuel excluding fuel storage associated with a municipal water supply emergency generator facility.
b. Future:
i. Below Grade Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for liquid fuel and fuel oil;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1) for liquid fuel and fuel oil.
ii. Above Grade Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A, for liquid fuel excluding fuel storage associated with a municipal water supply emergency generator facility;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area A, for fuel oil;
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1), for liquid fuel and fuel oil.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-46 |
To ensure the existing and/or future handling and storage of fuel does not become or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Below Grade Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for liquid fuel;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area A, for liquid fuel storage associated with a municipal water supply emergency generator facility;
iii. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for fuel oil;
iv. In Intake Protection Zone One (1), for liquid fuel and fuel oil;
v. Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9), for liquid fuel and fuel oil;
vi. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9), for liquid fuel and fuel oil.
ii. Above Grade Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for liquid fuel;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for fuel oil tanks;
iii. Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9), for liquid fuel and fuel oil;
iv. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9), for liquid fuel and fuel oil..
b. Future:
i. Above Grade Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for liquid fuel except at bulk liquid fuel facilities, gas stations and transportation terminals;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area A, for liquid fuel associated with a municipal water supply emergency generator facility;
iii. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to (10), for fuel oil tanks;
iv. Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9), for liquid fuel and fuel oil;
v. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9), for liquid fuel and fuel oil..
The Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to reduce the likelihood of spills and leaks and contain and respond to spills. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-48 |
To provide guidance about the importance of source water protection and to promote best management practices:
a. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in the activity of the existing handling and storage of fuel oil and liquid fuel except at bulk liquid fuel facilities, gas stations, transportation terminals and aggregate operations in Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), Intake Protection Zone One (1), Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9), and Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9). The incentive program shall facilitate the use of beneficial management practices that reduce the impact on groundwater.
b. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons engaged in the existing and new storage of fuel oil in Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10). The education program shall provide homeowners with information relating to potential impacts of spills to drinking water sources and to fuel suppliers regarding their obligations for inspections.
c. The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons engaged in the existing and new handling and storage of liquid fuel where it is a secondary land use in Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10)), Intake Protection Zone One (1), Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9), and Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9). The education program shall encourage property owners to implement beneficial management practices for protection of groundwater.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-5 |
To promote best management practices and to provide guidance about the importance of source water protection, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop education and awareness programs for persons engaged in existing and new activities in the following areas
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10) for the storage of hazardous, Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) or small quantity exemptions of hazardous wastes or liquid industrial wastes at any type of disposal site including generators, receivers and transfer/processing sites;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone 1 for the storage of hazardous, PCB or small quantity exemptions of hazardous wastes or liquid industrial wastes at any type of disposal site including generators, receivers and transfer/processing sites.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-50 |
To ensure the existing and/or future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A.
b. Future:
i. Handling and Storage:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
iii. Where a Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8), for trichloroethylene and related degradation products.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-51 |
To ensure that the existing and/or future handling and storage of a dense non aqueous phase liquid ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
ii. Where a Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8), for trichloroethylene and related degradation products.
b. Future:
i. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas B and C where the vulnerability is equal to six (6) or eight (8);
ii. Where a Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A where the vulnerability is equal to six (6), for trichloroethylene and related degradation products.
The Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to reduce the likelihood of spills and leaks and contain and respond to spills. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-52 |
To provide guidance about the importance of source water protection and to promote best management practices, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in the existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid within the following vulnerable areas:
i. In all Wellhead Protection Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
ii. Where a Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to eight (8), for trichloroethylene and related degradation products.
The incentive program shall facilitate, as a minimum, measures to reduce the likelihood of spills and leaks and contain and respond to spills.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-53 |
To provide guidance about the importance of source water protection and to promote best management practices the Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons engaged in the existing and future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids in the following areas:
i. In all Wellhead Protection Areas where the vulnerability is less than eight (8).
The education and outreach program shall provide property owners with information relating to potential impacts of spills to drinking water and encourage implementation of beneficial management practices for protection of groundwater from dense non aqueous phase liquid storage and handling.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-54 |
To ensure the existing and/or future handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A, below grade.
b. Future:
i. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A, above and below grade;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), below grade.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-55 |
To ensure the existing and/or future handling and storage of an organic solvent does not become or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A, above grade;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), above and below grade.
b. Future:
i. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), above grade.
The Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to reduce the likelihood of spills and leaks and contain and respond to spills.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-55.1 |
To provide guidance about the importance of source water protection and to promote best management practices, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in existing handling and storage of organic solvent within the following vulnerable areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A, above grade;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), above and below grade.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-56 |
To ensure that the expansion of existing or new airport facilities that lead to the generation of run-off containing de-icing chemicals does not become a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat:
a. Any new management of run-off that contains chemicals used in the de icing of aircraft is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability equals ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9);
iv. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9).
b. This activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required with existing management of run-off structures that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft where this activity could be a significant drinking water threat within the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9);
iv. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-57 |
To ensure the existing and/or future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and is prohibited within the following vulnerable areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Outdoor Confinement Area or Farm-Animal Yard;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A.
b. Future:
i. Outdoor Confinement Area or Farm-Animal Yard;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A;
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
ii. Livestock Grazing or Pasturing Land;
i. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-58 |
To ensure the existing and/or future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required in the following areas and for the following activities:
a. Existing:
i. Outdoor Confinement Area or Farm Animal Yard;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).;
ii. Livestock Grazing or Pasturing Land;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Areas B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8).
b. Future:
i. Outdoor Confinement Area or Farm Animal Yard;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is equal to six (6) or eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than six (6).;
ii. Livestock Grazing or Pasturing Land;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8).
The Risk Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to manage the generation of manure, livestock activities, and reduce the potential for surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-59 |
To provide guidance about the importance of source water protection and to
promote best management practices, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall
develop and implement an incentive program for persons engaging in the existing
use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard and the existing
use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to
ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing
Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-60 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for persons engaged in the existing and future use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, outdoor confinement area or a farm animal yard in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), for new use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land;
ii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-62 |
To ensure that any consumptive water taking and any activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall support any water efficiency education and outreach programs developed by The Township of Centre Wellington to promote water conservation, demand management and use of best management practices that maintain groundwater recharge for private water users within the Region of Waterloo. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-63 |
To ensure that any consumptive water taking and any activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo will collaborate with the County of Wellington, Grand River Conservation Authority, and Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, to support management of local water resources and protection of municipal drinking water supply sources, including but not limited to establishing a drought response program, consideration of climate change impacts and mitigation, encourage monitoring, data sharing and coordination among the agencies, and support the use, maintenance, and update of the Tier 3 Water Budget model. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-64 |
To ensure that any consumptive water taking and any activity that reduces the recharge of an aquifer never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities would be significant drinking water threats as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, any municipality or conservation authority developing or approving a sub-watershed study terms of reference and monitoring program shall review, and where appropriate, incorporate the Tier 3 Water Budget results as part of the sub-watershed study. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-8 |
To ensure small onsite sewage systems and holding tanks cease to be or do not become
significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant
drinking water threats, the Area Municipalities shall implement a septic system
maintenance inspection program, as required under the Ontario Building Code for
the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal
to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing
Areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW-8.1 |
To promote best management practices and to provide guidance about the importance of source water protection the Regional Municipality of Waterloo shall develop and implement an incentive program for persons with existing small onsite sewage systems and holding tanks where they are significant for the following area:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-CW/NB-40 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities and the Ontario Ministry of Transportation shall enhance road design measures in Environmental Assessments to modify, widen or expand existing roads and/or design/develop new roads to minimize the impact from any application of salt on roadways related to the development of new roads in the following area:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, and in all Wellhead Protection Areas. The assessment should make recommendation for enhanced measures to protect drinking water sources to be carried through detailed design and construction of the road.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-1.13 |
For the purposes of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo Source Protection Plan policies, where one or more of the following has been received prior to the Source Protection Plan coming into effect:
A complete application for site plan approval under the Planning Act;
A complete application for Environmental Compliance Approval;
A complete application for a Building Permit.
A related significant threat activity shall be permitted subject to the policies pertaining to existing significant threat activity as well as any further development applications and approvals required under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, Building Permit or Prescribed Instruments required to implement the development proposal associated with this significant threat activity.
Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, this policy will no longer apply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-1.16 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall:
- Ensure that all Prescribed Instruments issued for Condition Sites include terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the risk to drinking water sources is managed. Appropriate conditions may include requirements for source control, remediation to provincial standards, monitoring and Contaminant Management Plans;
- Ensure that Prescribed Instruments include a condition requiring the instrument holder to report on the actions taken and the status of the site to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, Source Protection Authority and the municipality on an annual basis;
- Provide to The Regional Municipality of Waterloo a copy of the new or revised Prescribed Instrument.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-1.18 |
To address known Condition Sites that are significant drinking water threats resulting from past activities, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities shall require, as a component of a complete application under the Planning Act, the completion of an environmental screening process using a contaminated sites protocol. The contaminated sites protocol will outline the criteria when a Record of Site Condition (RSC) or other conditions will be required as part of the Planning Act application and shall be consistent with the Region of Waterloo contaminated sites protocol. The contaminated sites protocol will decrease the opportunity for contamination to leave the site and remove the property from the list of significant conditions over time. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set out by the Minister:
a. For Sections 43 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location immediately before relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan took effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Sections 40 and 42 of the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Council of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Area Municipalities shall adopt an Official Plan Amendment to conform with the relevant significant threat policies within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan comes into effect or the next Official Plan review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act whichever comes first. All Zoning By-law Amendments to conform with the relevant significant threat policies shall be completed within two (2) years from the adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-1.27 |
Any Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act that is created or amended or is used for the purposes of obtaining an exemption from a Risk Management Plan under Section 61 of O. Reg. 287/07 shall incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, manage the activities they regulate such that those activities cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat. The Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are or would be significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions including the Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by the Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs such as Nutrient Management Plans. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-1.4 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Area Municipalities shall amend their Official Plan where necessary to conform with the significant drinking water threat policies, in accordance with Section 40 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 to:
a. Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the Clean Water Act, 2006 are or would be significant;
b. Indicate that within the areas identified, any use that is or would be a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies;
c. Incorporate any other amendments required to conform to the threat specific land use policies contained in this Source Protection Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-10 |
To ensure existing and new large onsite sewage systems cease to be or do not become significant drinking water threats, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the following policies apply:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval for an existing large onsite sewage system contains terms and conditions as appropriate to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat in the following vulnerable areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval for a new large onsite sewage system contains terms and conditions as appropriate to ensure that the activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat in the following vulnerable areas:
i. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than six (6).
The Environmental Compliance Approval should include annual reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks of water quality monitoring in related monitoring wells.
For Issue Contributing Areas, the Environmental Compliance Approval should require applicable chemical effluent criteria established using Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Reasonable Use Policy (Guideline B-7) relative to water quality levels in the municipal aquifer as appropriate.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-11 |
For future effluent discharges from a sewage treatment plant, including lagoons and future below grade storage of sewage and industrial effluent discharge located within the following vulnerable areas and where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the following policies apply:
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit the following activities within the Environmental Compliance Approval process to ensure these activities do not become a significant drinking water threat:
a. Sewage treatment plant effluent discharge including lagoons;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).;
b. Storage of sewage (treatment tank or storage tank), where the tank is completely underground;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A, B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
c. Industrial effluent discharge to surface;
i. In Intake Protection Zone One (1). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-11.1 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the following existing or future activities contain terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the activity does not become and/or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat to groundwater and drinking water supplies within the specified vulnerable areas:
a. Existing:
i. Sewage treatment plant effluent discharges including lagoons;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6);
iv. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than six (6);
v. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
vi. In Intake Protection Zone Two and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8).
ii. Storage of sewage (treatment tank or storage tank) where the tank is completely underground;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A, B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6);
iv. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than six (6).
iii. Storage of sewage (treatment tank or storage tank) and any part of the tank is at or above grade;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A, B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Nitrate and/or TCE Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6);
iv. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than six (6).
iv. Industrial effluent discharge (to surface);
i. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate, Chloride and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6);
iv. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8).
v. Sewage treatment plant bypass discharges to surface water
i. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6);
iv. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8).
b. Future:
i. Sewage treatment plant effluent discharges including lagoons;
i. In Intake Protection Zone Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than or equal to six (6).
ii. Storage of sewage (treatment tank or storage tank) where the tank is completely underground;
i. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than six (6).
iii. Storage of Sewage (treatment tank or storage tank) and any part of the tank is at or above grade;
i. In all Wellhead Protection Areas A, B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or is equal to eight (8);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6);
iv. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than six (6).
iv. Industrial effluent discharge (to surface);
i. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
ii. Where a Nitrate, Chloride and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8).
v. Sewage treatment plant bypass discharges to surface water
i. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in the Issue Contributing Area where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6);
iv. In the Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8).
For storage of sewage, the terms and conditions should include, as a minimum, measures to reduce the likelihood of spills and leaks, measures to contain and respond to spills and annual reporting to the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks.
For effluent discharge from a sewage treatment plant, including lagoons, the terms and conditions should include, as a minimum, monitoring for nitrogen where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, annual reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks of water quality monitoring in related groundwater monitoring wells, as appropriate, and contingency plans for responding to spills and leaks.
For industrial effluent discharge to surface, the terms and conditions should include, as a minimum, measures to ensure facilities are maintained, contingency plans for responding to spills and leaks, and surface water monitoring for nitrogen where there is a Nitrate Issue.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-12 |
For sanitary sewers and related pipes including pump stations located within the following vulnerable areas and where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the following policies apply:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval for existing sanitary sewers and related pipes includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat within the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval for new sanitary sewer and related pipes including pumping stations includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
The Environmental Compliance Approval shall include contingency plans for responding to spills as appropriate. Within Wellhead Protection Area A, the Environmental Compliance Approval shall also include enhanced construction to reduce likelihood of leaks.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-13 |
For combined sewers located within the following vulnerable areas and where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the following policies apply:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs existing combined sewers contains terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat to groundwater and drinking water supplies within the specified vulnerable areas:
i. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
ii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than six (6).
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit future combined sewers within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process to ensure they do not become a significant drinking water threat:
i. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
ii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate and/or Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than six (6).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-15 |
For existing discharge from a stormwater management facility within vulnerable areas where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, in consultation with the owner of the stormwater management facility and following the completion of the assessment identified in policy RW-CW-19, shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the stormwater management facility includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat in the following vulnerable areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
v. Where a Nitrate and/or Chloride Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-16 |
To ensure the new discharge from a stormwater management facility does not become a significant drinking water threat within vulnerable areas where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit the new discharge from a stormwater management facility within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process in the following areas as appropriate:.
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone one One (1).
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the new discharge from a stormwater management facility includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat when permitted in the following areas as appropriate:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate and/or Chloride Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A.
The Environmental Compliance Approval should include, as a minimum, water quality monitoring measures and reporting annually to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, as appropriate. Where there is a Nitrate, and/or Chloride Issue, groundwater and/or surface water quality shall be monitored for Nitrate and Chloride, respectively.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-17 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Area Municipalities shall review and, if necessary, amend their Official Plans and Zoning By-laws to prohibit stormwater management facilities in the following areas to ensure these activities never become significant drinking water threats:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-18 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities shall review and, if necessary, amend their Official Plans to require any development proposals for new storm water management facilities shall be subject to a study to assess impact and mitigation measures in accordance with the Regional Implementation Guideline for Source Water Protection Studies to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo within the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate and/or Chloride Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A.
Where a proposed stormwater management pond is located within 500 metres of a Drinking Water System that obtains water from a bedrock aquifer, the study shall, as a minimum, assess changes in classification of the municipal supply well and or changes in hydrogeological conditions that could affect the pathogen vulnerability to the well.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-2 |
For existing and/or future waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act within vulnerable areas where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit, within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process, the establishment of a new waste disposal site in the following vulnerable areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land farming of petroleum waste, landfilling of hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous or Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) waste at landfills or transfer stations;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Areas A, B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8) for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste;
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous, or PCB waste at landfills or transfer stations;
iv. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous waste at landfills or transfer stations;
v. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous waste at landfills or transfer stations;
vi. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas for landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste;
vii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas for the application of hauled sewage;
viii. Where a Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste.
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs an existing waste disposal site contains appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. The Environmental Compliance Approval should include annual reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks of water quality monitoring in related groundwater monitoring wells and surface water monitoring locations as appropriate in the following vulnerable areas where the following activities are identified as a significant drinking water threat:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, landfilling of hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous or Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) waste at landfills or transfer stations;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Areas A, B and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8) for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste;
iii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1) for the application of hauled sewage to land, land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste and storage of hazardous or Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) waste at landfills or transfer stations;
iv. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to or greater than eight (8) for the application of hauled sewage to land;
v. In Intake Protection Zones Two (2) and Three (3) where the vulnerability is equal to nine (9) for the land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous waste at landfills or transfer stations ;
vi. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8) for the application of hauled sewage to land;
vii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than nine (9) for the land-farming of petroleum waste, or landfilling of municipal waste, solid non-hazardous waste, and/or hazardous waste, and storage of hazardous waste at landfills or transfer stations;
viii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas for landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste;
ix. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas for the application of hauled sewage;
x. Where a Trichloroethylene Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste.
Where there is a Nitrate Issue, the Environmental Compliance Approval for landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste, should include annual reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and monitoring for nitrogen as appropriate.
Where there is a Nitrate Issue, the Environmental Compliance Approval for the application of hauled sewage should include annual reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and monitoring for nitrogen as appropriate.
Where there is a Trichloroethylene Issue, the Environmental Compliance Approval for the injection of liquid industrial waste, landfilling of municipal waste and/or solid non-hazardous waste should include annual reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and monitoring for trichloroethylene and degradation products as appropriate.
c. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs existing or new temporary waste destruction units for polychlorinated biphenyl contains appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become be a significant drinking water threat. The Environmental Compliance Approval should include annual reporting to the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks of water quality monitoring in related groundwater monitoring wells and surface water monitoring locations as appropriate in the following vulnerable areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-21.1 |
To ensure that the exiting and/or future application, temporary field storage or permanent storage of agricultural source material cease to be or do not become a significant drinking water threat where the activities are or would be a significant threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall prohibit these activities through Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies to ensure they do not become a significant drinking water threat:
a. Existing:
i. Temporary field storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Intake Protection Area One (1);
iii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas;
ii. Permanent storage;
i. In Intake Protection Zone One (1)
iii. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
b. Future:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
ii. Temporary field storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1);
iii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas.
iii. Permanent storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-22 |
To ensure that the existing and/or future application and permanent storage of agricultural source material within vulnerable areas does not become or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review and, if necessary, amend existing and approve new Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies with the terms and conditions set out below, as appropriate, where required under, and in accordance with, the Nutrient Management Act for the following:
a. Existing:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
ii. Permanent Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
b. Future:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
ii. Permanent Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A, where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
The Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies for the application of agricultural source material should include measures to be implemented by the farmer and/or custom applicator to ensure application rate, timing and location are appropriate for crop uptake of nitrogen on an annual basis and that reduce potential for surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration.
The Nutrient Management Plans and Strategies for the permanent storage of agricultural source material should require facilities to contain a minimum of 240 days for storage and to identify measures to minimize, contain and respond to spills and leaks.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-25 |
To ensure the existing and/or future application, handling and storage of non-agricultural source material cease to be or do not become a significant drinking water threat where these activities are or would be a significant threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and/or Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process and/or through Non-Agricultural Source Material Plans to ensure they do not become a significant drinking water threat:
a. Existing:
i. Application, Handling, Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1).
b. Future:
i. Application, Handling, Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Intake Protection Zone One (1). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-26 |
To ensure the existing and/or future application, handling and storage of non-agricultural source material do not become or cease to be a significant drinking water threat where these activities are or would be a significant threat Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall review and, if necessary, amend existing and approve new Non-Agricultural Source Material Plans with the terms and conditions set out below, as appropriate, where required under the Nutrient Management Act for the following:
a. Existing:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A.
ii. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A.
b. Future:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A.
ii. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A.
For the application of non-agricultural source material, the Plan should include measures that reduce potential for surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration of nitrogen. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-27 |
To ensure that existing and/or future off-farm application or handling and storage of non agricultural source material as processed organic waste (i.e. biosolids) do not become or cease to be a significant drinking water threat where these activities are or would be a significant threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend, existing and approve new Environmental Compliance Approvals with the conditions set out below, as appropriate, for the following:
a. Existing:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified in all Issue Contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A.
ii. Handling and Storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified in all Issue Contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A.
b. Future:
i. Application;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified in all Issue Contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A.
ii. Handling and storage;
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area E where the vulnerability is greater than eight (8);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified in all Issue Contributing Areas except in Wellhead Protection Area A.
For the application of non-agricultural source material, the Approval should include measures to ensure application rate, timing and location are appropriate for uptake of nitrogen on an annual basis and that reduce potential for surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration.
For the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material, the Approval should include measures to minimize, contain and respond to spills and leaks. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-36 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities shall amend their Official Plans to state that Planning Act and Condominium Act applications proposing new roads as part of a subdivision and condominium applications where salt could be applied may be permitted subject to study in accordance with the Regional Implementation Guideline for Source Water Protection Studies and a Regional Salt Impact Assessment to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, in all Wellhead Protection Areas except Wellhead Protection Area A.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-47 |
Where future storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities shall review and, if necessary, amend their Official Plans and Zoning By-laws to prohibit new bulk liquid fuel facilities, gas stations and transportation terminals excluding fuel storage associated with a municipal emergency generator facility in Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-49 |
Where existing and/or new handling and storage of fuel is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a vulnerable area for activities regulated under the Aggregate Resources Act within vulnerable areas, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, should ensure that licenses, permits and site plans issued under the Aggregate Resources Act and related regulations, standards and policies include terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure the activity does not become or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-6 |
To ensure small onsite sewage systems and onsite sewage system holding tanks do not become significant drinking water threats, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Area Municipalities shall amend, where required, their Official Plans to prohibit the creation of new lots that rely on servicing by small septic systems and/or to require all new lots to connect to existing municipal wastewater services within the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area A;
ii. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10) for municipal wells which are designated under the Safe Drinking Water Act as Groundwater Under the Direct Influence of surface water (GUDI);
iii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, within Wellhead Protection Areas A, B, and C where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to eight (8);
iv. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, for the K23 wellfield, in the Issue Contribution Area where the vulnerability is equal to six (6).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-65 |
To ensure that any consumptive water taking ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, the following shall apply:
a. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall review and, if necessary, amend Permits To Take Water (PTTW) and / or Drinking Water Works Permits to ensure that the municipal supply will not be adversely impacted, and to consider the Tier 3 Water Budget results including consideration of water supply requirements for planned growth and prolonged drought.
b. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall issue Permits To Take Water (PTTW) and / or Drinking Water Works Permits to ensure that the municipal supply will not be adversely impacted. The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, where appropriate, should ensure the use of the Tier 3 Water Budget model, reports and data in its evaluation of these takings including consideration of water supply requirements for planned growth and prolonged drought.
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall consider the following Permit to Take Water terms and conditions that address:
i. groundwater and surface water monitoring;
ii. demand management: water needs assessment (review of permitted maximum takings) and water efficiency measures;
iii. information sharing with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, municipalities and conservation authorities including a condition of approval for permit holders to provide municipalities and conservation authorities technical reports and monitoring data gathered pursuant to a condition of the PTTW (as per first bullet); and
iv. drought management planning for drought sensitive wells / systems.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-66 |
To ensure that any consumptive water taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, in consultation with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, owner of the municipal drinking water system for the respective WHPA-Q, and Grand River Conservation Authority, shall include appropriate terms and conditions in any new approvals under the Aggregate Resources Act, 1990 for extraction below the water table to ensure the sustainability of the applicable municipal water sources identified in the WHPA-Q. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-68 |
To ensure that any consumptive water taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and local municipalities shall review and amend as required their Official Plan policies and / or study requirements, to ensure any consumptive water taking associated with a development application does not impact the sustainability of the Centre Wellington municipal water supplies and ensure any study associated with a development application is required to be submitted as part of a complete application. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-7 |
To ensure small onsite sewage systems and onsite sewage system holding tanks do not become significant drinking water threats, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and the Area Municipalities shall amend where required their Official Plans to permit the creation of a new lot relying on servicing by a new small onsite sewage system only in accordance with the Regional Implementation Guideline for Source Water Protection Studies to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality within the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Area B where the vulnerability is to equal ten (10) for municipal wells which are not designated under the Safe Drinking Water Act as Groundwater Under the Direct Influence of surface water (GUDI);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is less than or equal to six (6);
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-MC-9 |
To ensure new large onsite sewage systems do not become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit, within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process, new large septic systems in the following areas:
i. In Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10);
ii. Where a Nitrate Issue has been identified, in all Issue Contributing Areas where the vulnerability is greater than or equal to six (6).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-1.17 |
To address Conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should prioritize abatement activities on Conditions Sites located within the Wellhead Protection Area A, Wellhead Protection Area B and Issues Contributing Areas. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-1.21 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and the Regional Municipality of Waterloo:
a. Shall meet at a minimum frequency of every six months for the purpose of mutually sharing information on Condition sites;
b. Should mutually share information related, as appropriate, to technical investigations or remediation, technical data, actions taken by Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks or by The Regional Municipality of Waterloo, inspections, other relevant information; and
c. Should develop an Information-Sharing Process document including requirements, if any, for meeting agendas, participants, the nature and format for the types of information to be mutually shared, and the Information-Sharing Process document should be developed within six months from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-1.22 |
To ensure Emergency Response Plans are updated for the purpose of protecting drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a Wellhead Protection Area or Intake Protection Zone along highways under the Highway Traffic Act and/or railway lines, the following policies apply:
Within one (1) year of the Source Protection Plan coming into effect, the Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities are requested to incorporate the location of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones into the Emergency Response Plan to protect drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways and/or railway;
Within six (6) months of the Source Protection Plan coming into effect, the Source Protection Authority in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide mapping of vulnerable areas to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along highways and/or rail lines.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-1.23 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities should amend their Official Plans to require the assessment and mitigation of impacts of the establishment of transport pathways associated with Planning Act applications in Wellhead Protection Areas A and B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10), in accordance with the Regional Implementation Guideline for Source Water Protection Studies to the satisfaction of the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-1.24 |
The Area Municipalities are requested to circulate to the Regional Municipality of Waterloo all development applications including site plan approval, proposing to create a transport pathway in Wellhead Protection Areas A, B and C and in their decision to approval such applications consider the comments relative to Source Protection from the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-1.25 |
The Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities are requested to update their Regional Municipality of Waterloo and Area Municipalities Design Guidelines and Supplemental Specifications for Municipal Services document within two (2) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect to consider Source Protection and to provide enhanced construction standards for transport pathways within Wellhead Protection Areas A and B to ensure that they do not contribute to the creation of significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-1.26 |
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry for Prescribed Instruments for significant drinking water threats within vulnerable areas and/or for locations where a Condition is identified, should advise the Regional Municipality of Waterloo regarding applications under review and provide the Regional Municipality of Waterloo an opportunity to comment on these applications. The relevant Ministry should consider the comments submitted by the Regional Municipality of Waterloo. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-1.7 |
The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide ongoing funding and support for incentive programs under section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, 2006 to protect existing and new drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats, such as the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-39.1 |
Where a Chloride and/or Sodium Issue has been identified, the Ontario Ministry of Transportation should review and, if necessary, revise their Salt Management Plans for the application of salt on roadways in all Wellhead Protection Areas. The Salt Management Plan should include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location reduce the potential for salt-related surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration and meet the objectives of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for Environmental Management of Road Salts including the salt vulnerable area mapping to include areas where significant threats can occur. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-44 |
The Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should consider an approval process for storage of snow in Wellhead Protection Areas where this activity can be a significant drinking water threat following Guideline B-4 (Snow Disposal and De icing Operations in Ontario, 2011) including measures that minimize the impact of surface and sub-surface drainage for any new storage of snow. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-61 |
To ensure this activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, the establishment and operation of a hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O.Reg 210/01 under the Technical Standards and Safety Authority Act or that is subject to the Canada Energy Regulator Act, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the pipeline proponent, the Canada Energy Regulator and Ontario Energy Board are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the Region of Waterloo the location of any new proposed pipeline within the Region of Waterloo and/or Source Protection Area and are encouraged to ensure that the applicant has complied with or included appropriate design standards, monitoring and maintenance practices, where applicable, to reduce the risk to drinking water sources.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
RW-NB-67 |
To ensure that any consumptive water taking ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and / or the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry should ensure source protection is included as a risk factor of Sites with Permits to Take Water (PTTW) and / or Aggregate Resources Act, 1990 Licenses in WHPA-Q Areas in the ministry local office risk-based compliance inspection planning process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S-1 |
Applicable Activities: Sewage systems as defined in section 1 of O. Reg. 350/06 (Building Code) made under the Building Code Act, 1992 that are existing significant drinking water threats or would be future significant drinking water threats.
S-1(1): Report by February 1 of each year to the applicable source protection authority on the implementation of the mandatory maintenance inspection program[1] for the preceding calendar year. The report must, at minimum, include the following information:
a) The number and location of inspections carried out under the maintenance inspection program during the reporting year;
b) The number and location of inspections that were not compliant with the septic inspection guideline; and
c) For the properties identified in (b), a description of the deficiencies in the system, the orders issued by the inspector, and any follow-up with the system owner.
S-1(2): Copy the municipality, building official, and Risk Management Official on all reporting required by Policy S-1(1) unless the municipality is the Principle Authority under the Ontario Building Code Act.
[1] The details of the inspection program are specified in the Ontario Building Code (O. Reg. 350/06) and the MMAH Sewage System Inspection Guideline |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S-10 |
Applicable Activities:The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage would be a future significant drinking water threat and both of the following conditions apply:
a) The system does not require a Prescribed Instrument; and
b) The Building Code Act, 1992 does not apply to the system.
S-10: The activity is prohibited and designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
S-2 |
S-2(1): Review all existing Prescribed Instruments related to these sewage activities to determine if they are adequate to ensure that the associated activities are not significant drinking water threats. If they are deemed to be inadequate for this purpose, they will be amended to include additional conditions that will ensure that the activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. All amendments to Prescribed Instruments required by this policy must be carried out within three years from the date that the plan takes effect or such other date as the applicable Director determines based on a prioritized review of Prescribed Instruments that govern the activity.
S-2(2): Conduct regular inspections of the sewage works to ensure compliance with the amendments referred to in (1).
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S-3 |
Applicable Activities: The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage that would be a future significant drinking water threat and would require a Prescribed Instrument, except a wastewater collection facility that collects or transmits sewage containing human waste.
S-3(1): Future occurrences of the activity shall only be permitted when:
a) The proposed activity is intended to replace an existing activity or activities;
b) The proposed activity would be more protective of drinking water; and
c) The instrument for the proposed activity contains conditions that ensure that it does not become a significant drinking water threat.
S-3(2): Future occurrences of the activity are prohibited. This does not apply for an activity that meets the conditions of Policy S-3(1).
S-3(3): Where a proposed future activity meets the conditions of Policy S-3(1), the following content is recommended to be included in the report required by Policy G-2(2):
a) A description of how the replacement activity will be more protective of drinking water than the existing activity or activities;
b) A description of the conditions of the Prescribed Instrument that will ensure that the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat; and
c) A description of any orders issued as a result of an inspection.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
S-4 |
Applicable Activities: Sewage systems as defined in section 1 of O. Reg. 350/06 (Building Code) made under the Building Code Act, 1992 that are existing significant drinking
water threats.
S-4(1): Require by means of a bylaw that the system is connected to a municipal sewage collection system where connection is feasible given financial and technical constraints. This bylaw must be established within one year.
S-4(2): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of how (1) was satisfied; and
b) A summary of any systems connected to municipal sewage collection.
S-4(3): Require a policy to support the objectives given in (1).
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S-5 |
Applicable Activities: Sewage systems as defined in section 1 of O. Reg. 350/06 (Building Code) made under the Building Code Act, 1992 that would be future significant drinking water threats.
S-5(1): Require a policy to support the following:
a) Where connection to a municipal sewage collection system is feasible given financial and technical constraints, new development will be serviced by a municipal sewage collection system; and
b) Where connection to a municipal sewage collection system is not feasible, new development will be serviced by a sewage system constructed to standards of the Ontario Building Code to ensure that the activity is not a significant drinking water threat.
S-5(2): The following content is recommended to be included in the report required by Policy G-10(2):
a) A summary of any approvals of septic systems in areas where they would be significant threats. Where the approval authority is not the municipality, the report will be copied to the applicable municipality.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
S-6 |
Applicable Activities: Wastewater collection facilities that collects or transmits sewage containing human waste that are existing significant drinking threats.
S-6(1): Within two years, ensure that there is an emergency response plan in place that is suitable to respond to a system failure that could result in the introduction of pathogens into surface water.
S-6(2): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) Updates or amendments to the plan;
b) Summary of training undertaken in support of the plan; and
c) Summary of incidents that required the use of the emergency response plan.
S-6(3): Within one year, prioritize any maintenance and asset management activities to ensure that facilities located in vulnerable areas are given adequate priority.
S-6(4): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) The status of any maintenance and asset management activities at facilities in vulnerable areas; and
b) After one year, a summary of how facilities were assessed.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S-7 |
Applicable Activities: Wastewater collection facilities that collects or transmits sewage containing human waste that would be future significant drinking water threats and would require a Prescribed Instrument.
S-7(1): Require that the activity complies with construction standards that will ensure that the activity is not a significant drinking water threat.
S-7(2): Ensure that the instrument contains conditions that ensure that the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
S-8 |
Applicable Activities: Stormwater management facilities designed to discharge stormwater to land or surface water that are existing significant drinking water threats.
S-8(1): Review all existing Prescribed Instruments to determine if they are adequate to ensure that the associated activities are not significant drinking water threats. If they are deemed to be inadequate for this purpose, they will be amended to include additional conditions that will ensure that the activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. All amendments to Prescribed Instruments required by this policy must be carried out within three years from the date that the plan takes effect or such other date as the applicable Director determines based on a prioritized review of Prescribed Instruments that govern the activity.
S-8(2): Develop and implement a stormwater management facility maintenance program within two years. The program will require regular inspection of stormwater management facilities to ensure that they are being sufficiently maintained such that the facility is not a significant drinking water threat
S-8(3): The municipality shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority.
Recommended contents of the report include, but are not limited to:
a) A summary of activities undertaken as part of the maintenance program for the preceding calendar year.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S-9 |
Applicable Activities: The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage is an existing significant drinking water threat and both of the following conditions apply:
a) The system does not require a Prescribed Instrument; and
b) The Building Code Act, 1992 does not apply to the system.
This activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S1EF-SA |
The Principal Authority as defined in Section 1(1) of the Building Code Act, 1992 (the Sudbury and District Health Unit as of the writing of this Plan) shall continue to implement and administer the mandatory on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program that is required under the Ontario Building Code in the vulnerable areas where septic systems could be a significant threat.
The Principal Authority shall prioritize inspections based on proximity to the drinking water source, the age of the septic system if known, and/or whether there is a previous history of failing septic systems in the area in question.
Monitoring policy M6 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S2EF-EO |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall create and deliver an education and outreach program to residents in the vulnerable areas where on-site septic systems could be significant threats. The program may include, but is not limited to, information regarding:
The importance of properly maintaining their septic system;
The potential impact of septic systems on drinking water and the natural environment; and
How to reduce use of phosphorus and sodium-containing products.
The education and outreach program may include information about available incentive programs to help upgrade failing septic systems. The program may also include other components such as information about the maintenance and inspection program managed by the Sudbury and District Health Unit. The City of Greater Sudbury shall also consider delivering the program in conjunction with the inspection program managed by the Sudbury and District Health Unit.
Monitoring policy M4 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S3F-PI |
For activities requiring approval under the Environmental Protection Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act no sewage works (future) shall be established where the establishment, operation and maintenance of sewage works is a significant drinking water threat, where sewage works include:
combined sewers;
wastewater treatment facilities that may discharge sewage to surface water by way of a designed bypass;
wastewater treatment facilities that discharge directly to land or surface water through a means other than a designed bypass (including lagoons); and
future industrial sewage systems.
This policy applies to all IPZ 1 and IPZ 2 areas with a vulnerability score of 9 or above for all four sewage threats. This policy also applies to WHPA A and B with a vulnerability score of 10 for the establishment of future wastewater treatment facilities that discharge directly to land or surface water through a means other than a designed bypass (including lagoons).
Monitoring policy M1 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
S4EF-PI |
Where S3F-PI does not apply and where a sewage system (existing and/or future) is in an area where this activity could be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the sewage system includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that:
The sewage system (existing) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; or
The sewage system (future) never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
This policy applies to all sewage threats, including stormwater infrastructure.
Monitoring policy M1 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
S5F-LUP |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall prohibit the severance of lots that would require the construction of new septic systems within the WHPA A and B and the IPZ 1 areas with vulnerability scores of 10.
Despite this prohibition, existing registered lots may be developed with an onsite individual septic system and the expansion, maintenance or replacement of existing on-site individual septic systems is allowed.
Monitoring policy M3 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
S6EF-SA |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall implement and enforce a sewer use by-law as amended from time to time in the area where the discharge from sanitary sewers and related pipes and stormwater management facilities could be a significant threat. The City of Greater Sudbury shall also prioritize inspections in such a way as to protect sources of municipal drinking water.
Monitoring policy M13 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S7F-LUP |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall incorporate into its official plan policies related to reducing stormwater runoff volume and pollutant loadings from developments in the vulnerable areas where stormwater management facilities could be a significant threat.
These policies shall:
Encourage implementation of a hierarchy of source, lot-level, conveyance and end-of-pipe controls;
Encourage the implementation of innovative stormwater management measures;
Consider flexibility in development standards to incorporate alternative community design and stormwwater techniques, such as those related to site plan design, lot grading, ditches and curbing, drive way surfaces, and the use of open space as temporary detention ponds; and
Support implementation of source control programs, which are targeted to existing areas that lack adequate stormwater controls.
Monitoring policy M3 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S8EF-EO |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall create and deliver an education and outreach program regarding the importance of reducing detrimental stormwater runoff from private properties. The program will provide relevant information to homeowners, businesses, and other property owners in the vulnerable areas where stormwater could be a significant threat.
The program may include, but is not limited to, the following:
Information about two approaches to pollution reduction: the proper use/storage of deleterious substances (including provision of information for water-friendly alternatives) and reducing stormwater runoff (e.g. rainwater harvesting, downspout disconnection, other Low Impact Development technologies);
Information about the development setback from water bodies and the shoreline buffer by-law, as well as information about how to re-naturalize a shoreline;
Information about the City of Greater Sudbury Lake Water Quality Program, which provides information and support to lakefront homeowners to improve the health of their properties;
Information about the Sewer Use By-law and complementary information about how to properly dispose of hazardous household products; and
Information about common individual behaviours that impact stormwater quality and quantity such as littering, the proper disposal of trash, cigarette butts, recyclables, pet-waste etc., applying lawn-chemicals and fertilizers, washing cars and changing motor-oil on driveways and water conservation.
A “yellow fish” type program to mark storm drains to remind people that water from storm drains up in bodies of water.
During the development of the program the CGS will consider community based social marketing techniques (e.g. as developed by Doug McKenzie-Mohr) and other such approaches that have been successful in changing people’s behaviour.
Monitoring policy M4 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
S9EF-SA |
The City of Greater Sudbury (CGS) will provide a Stormwater Management Strategy to the Source Protection Authority (SPA) for the Ramsey Lake Issue Contributing Area within five years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. This strategy will outline the CGS's planned stormwater management approach for the area, explaining how the protection of Ramsey Lake as a primary drinking water source was considered.
The strategy will evaluate the range of stormwater management technologies and techniques (e.g. from conventional to 'green infrastructure'). The strategy should consider the appropriateness of technologies and techniques for Greater Sudbury (e.g. taking into account geology, current climate and projections of future climate due to climate change). The strategy will explain how the technologies chosen will best protect drinking water while meeting other stormwater management goals (e.g. flood control).
The CGS will also research and consider policy tools such as by-laws and reduced permitting fees to promote on-site Low Impact Development / Green Infrastructure by private developers and landowners.
Monitoring policy M14 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
Sa1EF-EO |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall create and deliver an education and outreach program to those residents, businesses, institutions and contractors who could be applying, handling and storing road salt and/or storing snow in the vulnerable areas where the activities could be a significant threat. The program will educate residents, businesses, institutions and contractors about:
The impact of salt on drinking water and the environment;
Standards for the application of road salt and salt alternatives; and
Best management practices and recommendations to reduce the amount of salt used and to reduce the deleterious effects of snow storage runoff.
The program could also include:
Educating suppliers;
Educating school-aged children; and
A “yellow fish” type program to mark storm sewer drains to remind people that water from storm sewers drains to bodies of water.
Monitoring policy M4 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
Sa2EF-SA |
To manage the existing and future application and the handling and storage of road salt, the City of Greater Sudbury shall identify in its Salt Management Plan the vulnerable areas where the activities could be a significant threat.
The City of Greater Sudbury shall optimize its use and management of salt and implement practices to minimize the loss of salt to the environment and the impact of salt on drinking water sources. Primary, arterial and collector roads in the vulnerable areas shall be prioritized for snow removal and street sweeping and cleaning during or soon after the spring snow melt.
The City of Greater Sudbury shall also include information about drinking water source protection (including the contents of the Source Protection Plan as it relates to the application and the handling and storage of road salt) in its annual training for employees who are responsible for the application and storage of road salt. The required updates to the Salt Management Plan and to city operations shall be completed within one year of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Monitoring policy M11 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
Sa3EF-RMP |
Where it could be a significant threat and where Policy Sa6F-SA does not apply, the application of road salt (existing and future) and storage of snow (existing) is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans for those properties with exterior parking lots equal to or greater than one (1) hectare in area. Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the application of road salt and the storage of snow could be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
Sa4E-RMP |
The existing handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purpose of s. 58 requiring Risk Management Plans in the vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant threat. In the Ramsey Lake Issue Contributing Area, this policy applies to 0.5 tonnes of road salt and greater.
The risk management plan shall require at a minimum that a permanent structure be constructed to house the salt and/or sand/salt mixture. The structure will be constructed on an impermeable pad and drainage will either be treated (e.g. collected and transferred to an appropriate treatment facility) or directed to flow away from sources of municipal drinking water. If excess outdoor storage space is required, the sand/salt will be stored on an impermeable pad, covered by a tarp, and drainage will either be treated or redirected to flow away from sources of municipal drinking water. Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the handling and storage of road salt could be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
Sa5F-s57 |
The future handling and storage of road salt is prohibited and therefore designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant threat. In the Ramsey Lake Issue Contributing Area, this policy applies to 0.5 tonnes of road salt and greater.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the future handling and storage of road salt would be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
Sa6F-SA |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall prohibit the future establishment of a municipal or commercial snow melt facility (snow dump) in the vulnerable areas where they would be a significant threat. The prohibition shall use a regulatory tool deemed appropriate and enforceable by the municipality.
This policy applies to large snow melt facilities / snow dumps where snow is transported from a variety of sites (roadside and parking lot clearing) and the accumulation of contaminants is greater.
Monitoring policy M12 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-1 |
For unassumed roads and private parking lots with greater than 200 square metres, the application of road salt is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing, future).
Without limiting other requirements, risk management plans shall include a goal to minimize salt usage through alternative measures, while maintaining roadway safety for users.
Timelines:
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-10 |
Where the application of road salt would be a moderate or low drinking water threat, the planning approval authority is encouraged to require a salt management plan, which includes a reduction in the future use of salt, as part of a complete application for development which includes new roads and parking lots in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS ≤ 10) (future); or
WHPA-C (future); or
WHPA-D (future); or
WHPA-E (VS ≥ 4.5 and <9) (future); or
HVA (future).
Such plans should include, but not be limited to, mitigation measures regarding design of parking lots, roadways and sidewalks to minimize the need for repeat application of road salt such as reducing ponding in parking areas, directing stormwater discharge outside of vulnerable areas where possible, and provisions to hire certified contractors. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-11 |
Where the application of road salt is, or would be, a moderate or low drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks in consultation with other provincial ministries and municipal associations should promote best management practices for the application of road salt, to protect sources of municipal drinking water in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS ≤ 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-C (existing, future); or
WHPA-D (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS ≥ 4.5 and <9) (existing, future); or
HVA (existing, future). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-12 |
Where the application of road salt on unassumed roads and private parking lots with greater than 200 square metres is, or would be, a moderate or low drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS ≤ 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-C (existing, future); or
WHPA-D (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS ≥ 4.5 and <9) (existing, future); or
HVA (existing, future).
the municipality is encouraged to:
a) require implementation of a salt management plan which includes the goal to minimize salt usage through alternative measures, while maintaining public safety; and
b) require the use of trained individuals in the application of road salt (could include technicians and technologists and others responsible for salt management plans, winter maintenance supervisors, patrollers, equipment operators, mechanics, and contract employees). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-13 |
Where the application, handling and storage of road salt is, or would be, a moderate or low drinking water threat, the municipality is requested to report the results of its sodium and chloride monitoring conducted under the Safe Drinking Water Act and any other monitoring programs annually to the Source Protection Authority. The Source Protection Authority shall assess the information for any increasing trends and advise the Source Protection Committee on the need for new source protection plan policies to be developed to prevent future drinking water Issues, in any of the following areas:
• WHPA-A (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
• WHPA-B (VS ≤ 10) (existing, future); or
• WHPA-C (existing, future); or
• WHPA-D (existing, future); or
• WHPA-E (VS ≥ 4.5 and <9) (existing, future); or
• HVA (existing, future). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-2 |
For public roads, the application of road salt is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would, be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing, future).
Without limiting other requirements, risk management plans shall include provisions for:
a) the reduction of salt usage through best management practices such as alternative de-icer materials (with lower sodium and chloride) and/or contemporary technology; and
b) the use of trained individuals in the application of road salt (could include technicians and technologists and others responsible for salt management plans, winter maintenance supervisors, patrollers, equipment operators, mechanics, and contract employees).
Timelines:
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-3 |
Where the application of road salt to roads and parking lots would be a significant drinking water threat, the planning approval authority shall:
1) Prohibit the establishment of new parking lots with greater than 2000 square metres in:
WHPA-A not in an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (future);
2) Prohibit the establishment of new parking lots with greater than 200 square metres in:
WHPA-A in an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (future); and
3) Require a salt management plan, which includes a reduction in the future use of salt, as part of a complete application for development which includes new roads and parking lots where the application of road salt is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS ≥ 9) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (future).
Such plans should include but not be limited to mitigation measures regarding design of parking lots, roadways and sidewalks to minimize the need for repeat application of road salt such as reducing ponding in parking areas; and directing stormwater discharge outside of vulnerable areas where possible. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-4 |
Where the application of road salt is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks in consultation with other provincial ministries and municipal associations should promote best management practices for the application of road salt, to protect sources of municipal drinking water in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-5 |
Where the application of road salt is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks in consultation with other provincial ministries and municipal associations should develop a licensing and accreditation program for Snow and Ice Contractors for the application of road salt, to protect sources of municipal drinking water in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-6 |
For provincial highways where the application of road salt is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing, future);
the Ministry of Transportation should:
a) continue the proactive implementation of their salt management plans with their supporting de-icing contactors and the use of best management practices within wellhead protection areas;
b) update their salt management plan, as required, to ensure consistency with the most current versions of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salts and Transportation Association of Canada's Synthesis of Best Practices;
c) investigate and implement where practical, alternative products and mitigation practices and technologies for road salt application and the management of highway runoff and infiltration;
d) in consultation with the Source Protection Authority, consider the information contained in the CTC Source Protection Assessment Reports for the siting and prioritization of future assessments related to road salt application and the management of highway runoff and infiltration. In particular, an assessment of application rates and options for reducing the application of salt should be undertaken at those wells in Orangeville immediately adjacent to Highways 9 and 10; and
e) forward upon request to the Source Protection Authority the results of monitoring data on specific pilot projects.
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-7 |
Where the handling and storage of road salt is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat (excluding incidental quantities for personal use), the following actions shall be taken:
1) The handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (future).
2) The handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing).
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-8 |
The municipality shall deliver education and outreach materials and programs where the application, handling and storage of road salt is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, targeted towards:
a) owners/tenants of residences and small businesses where the application, handling and storage of road salt (existing, future) is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat about the impact of salt on municipal drinking water and what they can do to reduce their use of salt to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat; and
b) commercial and industrial sectors to address the importance of source protection planning and the impacts of road salt on drinking water sources, with the key message being responsible salt storage and application, and the use of contemporary technology; in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing, future).
Where appropriate education and outreach materials prepared by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks are available, the municipality shall deliver those materials.
Timelines:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SAL-9 |
Where the application, handling and storage of road salt (existing, future) is, or would be, a
significant drinking water threat in an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride the
following actions shall be taken:
a) the responsible Source Protection Authority, in partnership with affected municipalities,
shall conduct an investigation on the source and nature of sodium or chloride threats,
contingent on funding;
b) the municipality shall undertake monthly sampling of sodium and chloride levels in raw
water at affected wells and report the results to the Source Protection Authority; and
c) the Source Protection Authority in partnership with affected municipalities shall assess
the information for any increasing trends and advise the Source Protection Committee on
the need for new source protection plan policies to be developed to prevent future
drinking water Issues. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SAL1 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Municipality shall prohibit the future establishment of a salt storage facility in vulnerable areas listed below where the threat from the storage of road salt could be significant. A municipal official plan and zoning by-law in effect for the
vulnerable areas shall be reviewed and amended, as necessary, as required under Section 26 of the Planning Act to implement this prohibition.
The areas where the establishment of a facility providing the storage of salt in amounts greater than 5,000 tonnes that is either uncovered or exposed to runoff could pose a significant threat are:
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SALT(APP)-1 |
With the exception of personal domestic use, the existing and future application of road salt is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will include terms and conditions to require a reduction in salt application, and comply with contemporary standards to ensure the application of road salt ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
SALT(App)-2 |
The MTO, in collaboration with OGRA and AMO, shall be encouraged to undertake research, and share results, into cost effective alternatives to salt application, new mitigative technologies, and innovative practices that do not compromise public safety, in vulnerable areas where the application of salt would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
SALT(H&S)-1 |
The existing handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will include terms and conditions that mirror a salt management plan, and comply with contemporary standards to ensure the handling and storage of road salt ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SALT(H&S)-2 |
Future handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
SALT(ICA)- 3 |
To manage the existing and future application of road salt, the City of Barrie shall optimize its use and management of salt, and implement practices to minimize the loss of salt to the environment and the impact of salt on drinking water. Primary arterial and collector roads in the ICA shall be prioritized for snow ploughing or removal, street sweeping and cleaning after the winter control season has ended. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SALT(ICA)-1 |
With the exception of personal domestic use the existing and future application of road salt is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within WHPA-A of the ICA. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will include terms and conditions to require a reduction in salt application, and comply with contemporary standards to ensure the application of road salt ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
SALT(ICA)-2 |
With the exception of personal domestic use, the existing and future handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, within WHPA-A of the ICA, and outside of WHPA-A where road salt is stored in quantities equal to or greater than 5 tonnes. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will include terms and conditions that mirror a salt management plan, and comply with contemporary standards to ensure the handling and storage of road salt ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
SALT-1 |
Where the future and existing application of road salt could be a significant drinking water threat, the Municipality shall develop or review/update their Salt Management Plan.
The Salt Management Plan will include at a minimum:
Management of sodium or chloride compounds used for dust suppression
Minimizing application of road salt and/or use of alternative compounds
Training for staff (such as the Smart About Salt program)
Implementation of best management practices for salt application outlined by Environment Canada and the Transportation Association of Canada
The Salt Management Plan will be initiated within one year and completed within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, after which it shall be reviewed annually to ensure it includes all current best management practices outlined by Environment Canada and the Transportation Association of Canada.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-1-LB-S58 |
The existing storage of road salt and storage of snow (at dumps where snow is hauled from another location) are designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where the threat is significant as described in Appendix B. Risk Management Plans shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-2 |
Existing handling and storage of road salt and storage of snow is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (Risk Management Plans) where it could be a significant threat. The Risk Management Plan shall include up-to-date best management practices regarding snow and salt storage and management of snow melt-water.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1, GENERAL-5 and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-2-LB-S57 |
The future storage of road salt and storage of snow (at snow dumps where snow is hauled from another location) are designated as prohibited under Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where the threat would be significant as described in Appendix B. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-3 |
Future storage and handling of road salt and storage of snow is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (prohibition) where it would be a significant drinking water threat.
This prohibition takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1 and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-3-LB |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, upper and lower tier municipalities with roads, sidewalks and municipally owned parking lots in the areas where road salt application and snow storage (snow piles) are or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, shall prepare and implement a Road Salt Management Plan for these areas in accordance with Environment Canada's Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salts. Areas outside of significant threat areas are subject to policy SALT-5-NLB. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-4 |
Where future/existing salt application would be a significant drinking water threat on Provincial network roadways, the Ministry of Transportation and their supporting de-icing contractors are strongly recommended to continue the proactive implementation of their Salt Management Plans and to continue the use of best management practices within the Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones.
The Ministry of Transportation is strongly recommended to continue their on-going investigation and implementation of innovative practices and new mitigative technologies regarding road salt application and the management of infiltration and runoff.
The Ministry of Transportation is strongly recommended to actively consider the creation of pilot projects to utilize new practices and mitigative technologies for road salt application or the management of runoff that could benefit drinking water sources in the Raisin-South Nation Source Protection Region.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-7. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-4-LB |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, municipalities that have areas where road salt application and/or snow storage (snow piles) are or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B shall begin to take the following action in these areas:
Undertake initiatives such as a municipal staff training program to encourage smart salt practices for municipally owned parking lots, sidewalks and other public facilities
Promote the Smart About Salt program to private contractors and encourage them to become Smart About Salt certified (Source Protection Authorities can assist with promotion.
Promote the Smart About Salt program to managers of private facilities and encourage them to certify their sites and use certified contractors (Source Protection Authorities can assist with promotion) |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-5 |
It is recommended that the Salt Institute implement an education and outreach program which targets private facility managers and salt application contractors in areas where salt application, handling and storage could be a significant drinking water threat. This program may be based on the 'Smart About Salt' program, or may include Best Management Practices from the Transportation Association of Canada, 2003 or Best Practices for Salt Use on Private Roads, Parking Lots and Sidewalks (Environment Canada, 2004). This program should be initiated within two years of the Source Protection Plan taking effect. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-5-NLB |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, upper and lower tier municipalities that apply road salt on roads, sidewalks and municipally owned parking lots in the Highly Vulnerable Aquifer are strongly encouraged to prepare and implement a Road Salt Management Plan in accordance with Environment Canada's Code of Practice for the Environmental Management of Road Salts. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SALT-6-NLB |
Within one year of the Source Protection Plan taking effect, municipalities within the Highly Vulnerable Aquifer are strongly encouraged to begin to:
Undertake initiatives such as a municipal staff training program to encourage smart salt practices for municipally owned parking lots, sidewalks and other public facilities
Promote the Smart About Salt program to private contractors and encourage them to become Smart About Salt certified (Source Protection Authorities can assist with promotion)
Promote the Smart About Salt program to managers of private facilities and encourage them to certify their sites and use certified contractors (Source Protection Authorities can assist with promotion) |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-1-LB |
The Principal Authorities shall implement the On-Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspection Program as required under the Ontario Building Code where existing and future on-site sewage systems are or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-10-LB-PI-MC |
A future stormwater management facility that would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B is permitted in the:
Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 8, 8.1 or 9
Wellhead Protection Area A; (under the exemption described in policy SEW-9-LB-PI/PA-MC)
Wellhead Protection Area B; with a vulnerability score of 10
The MOE shall ensure that the Prescribed Instrument (Environmental Compliance Approval required under the Ontario Water Resources Act) that governs a stormwater management facility permitted to be established in these areas includes appropriate terms and conditions to manage the threat so that it does not become significant. Where the Director considers it appropriate, terms and conditions will include a requirement that a new stormwater management facility be built to Enhanced Level Protection Standards as described in the Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual, MOE 2003 |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-11-LB-S58 |
A stormwater management facility that is not governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval) is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in the following situations:
An existing stormwater management facility that is a significant threat as described in Appendix B
A future stormwater management facility that would be a significant threat as described in Appendix B located within the:
Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 8, 8.1 or 9;
Wellhead Protection Area A; (under the exemption described in policy SEW-9-LB-PI/PA-MC); and
Wellhead Protection Area B; with a vulnerability score of 10.
Where the Risk Management Official considers it appropriate, Risk Management Measures will require that a new stormwater management facility be built to Enhanced Level Protection Standards as described in the Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual, MOE 2003. Risk Management Plans for existing stormwater management facilities shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-12-LB-S57 |
A stormwater management facility that is not governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Environmental Compliance Approval) is designated as prohibited under section 57 of the Clean Water Act in the following situation:
a. A future stormwater management facility that would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B located within:
* Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 10; and,
* Wellhead Protection Area "A"
A stormwater management facility is exempt from this policy and instead subject to policy SEW-11-LB-S58 if:
* It is located within a Wellhead Protection Area "A" that is under municipal ownership and maintained in a natural state that protects source water
* It is located at the outer perimeter of the Wellhead Protection Area "A" and a minimum of 30 metres from the municipal well; and
* It is located in an area where it can be demonstrated that there is no discernible hydrogeological connection between the surface and the aquifer supplying the municipal well.
|
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-13-LB-PI-MC |
Where an existing sewage works is a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the MOE shall ensure that the Prescribed Instrument (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval required under the Ontario Water Resources Act) that governs the sewage works includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that it ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. This policy applies where the types of sewage works include:
Sewage treatment plant effluent discharges
Industrial effluent discharges
Storage of sewage (excluding storage associated with the sewer network)
Combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water
Sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water
The MOE shall review and amend the Prescribed Instrument within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-14-LB-S58 |
An existing sewage works that is not governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval) is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan. This policy applies to the types of sewage works listed in policy SEW-13-LB-PI-MC in areas where the sewage works is a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B. Risk Management Plans shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-15-LB-PI/PA-MC |
Future sewage works of the types listed in policy SEW-13-LB-PI-MC are prohibited where they would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B. Accordingly, decisions to issue, otherwise create or amend Prescribed Instruments (Environmental Compliance Approvals under the Ontario Water Resources Act) must conform with this policy. In addition, decisions made by planning authorities under the Planning Act must conform with this policy. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-16-LB-S57 |
Future sewage works of the types listed in policy SEW-13-LB-PI-MC that are not governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Environmental Compliance Approval) are designated as prohibited under Section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where they would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-2-LB |
In areas where on-site sewage system are a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the Principal Authorities shall establish a procedure to ensure that their review under the Ontario Building Code of redevelopment or renovation proposals using existing systems uses well-documented technical information to determine if the current system is adequate. The procedure should involve the careful consideration of such factors as depth to water table, soil type, size and age of system and lot size. The procedure must be established within 6 months from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-3-LB |
In areas where on-site sewage systems would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the municipality shall require lot grade and drainage plans as part of the application materials for building permits where a new system is proposed as part of new development. New systems are only permitted where policy SEW-4-LB (Mandatory Connection to Municipal Sewer Services) does not apply. Lot grade and drainage plans must show existing grade and proposed final grade elevations referenced to a permanent benchmark. The new requirements must be established within six months from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-4-LB |
In areas where on-site sewage systems are a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the municipality through their powers under the Municipal Act must require connection to municipal services (capacity permitting and within designated serviced areas) where services are available at the property line in the following situations:
Where an existing system has failed a Phase II Maintenance Inspection and/or an order has been issued to replace or do significant upgrades
When the Principal Authority has deemed an existing system inadequate to service a proposed redevelopment / renovation
For new development
The new requirements must be established within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. This policy also applies to on-site sewage systems regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-5-LB-PI-MC |
Where an on-site sewage system regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act (existing and/or future) is or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the MOE shall ensure that the
Prescribed Instrument that governs the system (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval) includes appropriate terms and conditions so that:
a) The system (existing) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat; or
b) The system (future) never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The MOE shall comply with part (a) of this policy within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Policy SEW-4-LB also applies to on-site sewage systems regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-6-LB |
In areas where sanitary sewers and related pipes are or would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the municipality shall implement a Sanitary Sewer Maintenance Program. Where possible, the program should include sewer pipe cleaning followed by a camera inspection focused on identifying areas of infiltration. Pressure testing of pipes may also be conducted in lieu of camera inspection. Remedial work is required if areas of discernible leakage are identified. The program shall be initiated within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. Each portion of the sewer network shall be subject to the maintenance program at five year intervals. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-7-LB-PI-MC |
Where new or replacement sanitary sewers and related pipes would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the MOE shall ensure that the Prescribed Instrument (Environmental Compliance Approval required under the Ontario Water Resources Act) includes appropriate terms and conditions to manage the threat so that it does not become significant. Where the Director considers it appropriate, terms and conditions will include requiring that new or replacement sanitary sewers and related pipes be constructed of watermain quality pipe and pressure tested in place at a pressure of 350 kPa (50 psi) using the testing methodology in Ontario Provincial Standard Specification 412 (OPSS 412). |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-8-LB-PI-MC |
Where an existing stormwater management facility is a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the MOE shall ensure that the Prescribed Instrument that governs the facility (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval required under the Ontario Water Resources Act) includes appropriate terms and conditions to manage the threat so that it ceases to be significant. The MOE shall review, and if necessary amend, the Prescribed Instrument within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEW-9-LB-PI/PA-MC |
Future stormwater management facilities that would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B are prohibited in the:
Wellhead Protection Area A; and
Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 10.
Accordingly, decisions to issue, otherwise create or amend Prescribed Instruments (Environmental Compliance Approvals under the Ontario Water Resources Act) must conform with this policy. In addition, decisions made by planning authorities under the Planning Act must conform with this policy. A stormwater management facility is exempt from this policy and instead subject to policy SEW-10-LB-PI-MC if:
It is located within a Wellhead Protection Area A; that is under municipal ownership and maintained in a natural state that protects source water;
It is located at the outer perimeter of the Wellhead Protection Area A; and a minimum of 30 metres from the municipal well; and
It is located in an area where it can be demonstrated that there is no discernable hydrogeological connection between the surface and the aquifer supplying the municipal well. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW1 |
The Ministry of Environment and Climate Change shall not issue an Environmental Compliance Approval for future activities where the threat from the establishment, operation or maintenance of a sewage works issued under the Environmental Protection Act would be significant.
For Environmental Compliance Approvals that exist in areas where the threats are significant for sewage works, the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change shall review their terms within three years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect and amend as necessary to ensure that the terms of each approval adequately addresses the threats to source water.
The Director as defined in the Environmental Protection Act or its Regulations may determine another implementation date based on a prioritized review Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern
significant drinking water threat activities.
This policy shall apply for the named activities and threat subcategories in the following vulnerable areas:
Combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water AND sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water:
Callander IPZ-1 and 2;
North Bay IPZ-1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Industrial effluent
discharges:
Callander IPZ-1, 2 and Issue Contributing
Area (ICA only if related to a circumstance containing phosphorus);
North Bay IPZ-1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Sewage treatment
plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons):
Callander IPZ-1 and 2;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
North Bay IPZ-1;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Storage of sewage
(e.g. treatment plant tanks):
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A, B and C;
Powassan WHPA-A, B1/B2/B4 and
C1; and
South River IPZ-1. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW2 |
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall ensure that for future Environmental Compliance Approvals for the establishment of sewage works issued under the Environmental Protection
Act, that the design of such facilities appropriately manages the threats to source waters and may consider the MOECC Design Guidelines for Sewage Works, 2008 and as amended.
For Environmental Compliance Approvals that exist where the threats could be significant for sewage works, the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change shall review their terms within three years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect and amend as necessary to ensure that the terms of each approval adequately addresses the threats to source water. The Director, as defined in the Environmental Protection Act or its Regulations, may determine another implementation date based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking
water threat activities.
This policy shall apply for the named activities and threat subcategories in the following vulnerable areas:
Discharge of Stormwater from a Stormwater Retention Pond:
Callander IPZ-1 and 2;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
North Bay IPZ-1;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Sanitary Sewers
and Related Pipes:
Callander Issue Contributing
Area (ICA only if related to a circumstance containing phosphorus);
Mattawa WHPA-A and B (has
existing); and
Powassan WHPA-A and B1;
Large Septic Systems
and Septic System Holding Tanks:
Callander Issue Contributing
Area (ICA only if related to a circumstance containing phosphorus);
Mattawa WHPA-A and B; and
Powassan WHPA-A and B1;
Sewage Treatment Plant
Effluent Discharges (includes lagoons):
Callander Issue Contributing
Area (ICA only if related to a circumstance containing phosphorus) |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEW3 |
For all future and existing septic systems that could be significant threats and that are subject to the requirements of the Ontario Building Code, a mandatory maintenance inspection program shall be implemented by the principal authority as defined by the Ontario Building Code.
This policy shall apply to the following vulnerable areas:
Callander
Issue Contributing Area
Mattawa
WHPA-A, and B;
Powassan
WHPA-A, and B1 |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEWG(a)-1 |
Where the existing and future establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of stormwater is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of stormwater include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. Such conditions may include:
1) permitting the expansion of an existing facility where the expansion does not pose a significant drinking water threat.
2) permitting retrofits to existing facilities where the retrofit will discharge the stormwater outside of the significant drinking water threat area. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(a)-2 |
The MOE is encouraged to consider conducting research to identify risks from infiltration ponds to aquifers used as a drinking water source, and to review contemporary technology for the design and operation of stormwater management facilities that can protect municipal drinking water systems. The research outcome should update stormwater management planning and design guidelines, the Tables of Circumstances, and be applied within vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(b)-1 |
Where the Ontario Water Resources Act does not require an approval, the existing establishment, operation or maintenance of a wastewater treatment plant and associated sewer systems is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan will include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the existing activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(b)-2 |
Where the existing establishment, operation or maintenance of a sewage treatment plant, sanitary sewers and related pipes, sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge to surface water, and sewage treatment plant effluent discharge (including lagoons) is a significant drinking water threat, the MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs these activities includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(b)-3 |
The future establishment, operation or maintenance of a sewage treatment plant, sewage treatment plant by-pass discharge to surface water, and sewage treatment plant effluent discharge (including lagoons) is prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(b)-4 |
Where the future establishment, operation or maintenance of sanitary sewers and related pipes would be a significant drinking water threat, the MOE shall incorporate appropriate terms and conditions into the Environmental Compliance Approval to ensure the activity does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(b)-5 |
Municipalities shall consider the implementation of programs to remove connections of stormwater sources to sanitary sewers to reduce surges in volumes during inflow/outflow, the removal of combined sewer overflow outlets to surface water and the establishment of upgrade priorities that focus on vulnerable areas where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(c)-1 |
Where an existing large (more than 10,000 litres) on-site sewage system is a significant drinking water threat, MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the on-site sewage system includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(c)-2 |
The future establishment of a large (more than 10,000 litres) on-site sewage system is prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(c)-3 |
Where services and capacity exist, municipalities are encouraged to consider enacting by-laws to require mandatory connection to municipal waste water systems in vulnerable areas where the on-site sewage system is a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(c)-4 |
Municipalities shall implement an inspection program for small on-site sewage systems that are located in vulnerable areas where they are a significant drinking water threat in accordance with the Ontario Building Code. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(d)-1 |
Where the existing discharge of industrial effluent is in an area where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the discharge of industrial effluent includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG(d)-2 |
The future discharge of industrial effluent is prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
SEWG-1 |
The Municipality shall implement a sanitary sewer inspection and maintenance program where sanitary sewers could be a significant threat. The program will include cleaning and camera inspection to identify areas of in/exfiltration. Exfiltration testing may be used where camera inspection is not feasible. Existing sanitary sewers shall be inspected no later than five years after the date the Plan takes effect; thereafter, they shall be inspected every five years after the most recent inspection has been completed. The Municipality shall also ensure that future applicants are aware of the requirements described below for new sanitary sewers where they are a significant threat.
New or replacement sanitary sewers shall be inspected no later than ten years after the date the Plan takes effect; thereafter, they shall be inspected every ten years after the most recent inspection has been completed.
Where new or replacement sanitary sewers and related pipes would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall ensure that the Prescribed Instrument (Environmental Compliance Approval required under the Ontario Water Resources Act, 1990) includes appropriate terms and conditions to manage the threat so that it does not become significant. Where the Director considers it appropriate, terms and conditions will include requiring that new or replacement sanitary sewers and related pipes be constructed of watermain quality pipe and pressure tested in place at a pressure of 350 kPa (50 psi) using the testing methodology in Ontario Provincial Standard Specification 412 (OPSS 412).
This policy takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-5 and MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEWG-2 |
Existing Approvals under the Ontario Water Resources Act, 1990 (as amended) for:
storage of sewage;
sewage treatment plant effluent discharges;
sewage treatment plant bypass discharges to surface water;
combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water; and
industrial effluent discharges;
shall be reviewed to ensure they contain conditions to protect sources of drinking water where they would be a significant drinking water threat. If the instrument does not meet these requirements, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) shall amend it to include additional terms and conditions to manage the threat.
Instruments that exist before the day the plan takes effect must be reviewed and, if necessary, amended within three years.
These policies take effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-2 and MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEWG-3 |
The following activities regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act, 1990 (as amended) shall not be established where they could be a significant drinking water threat:
storage of sewage;
sewage treatment plant effluent discharges;
sewage treatment plant bypass discharges to surface water;
combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water ; and
industrial effluent discharges which discharge to surface water and have their primary function in the collection, transmission or treatment of industrial sewage.
The aforementioned activities are exempt from this prohibition if:
The new sewage treatment plant will replace an existing sewage treatment plant; or
The expansion to existing municipal sewage treatment will provide full services to a new or existing development which is partially serviced or a development where on-site septic systems are failing.
Accordingly, decisions relating to Prescribed Instruments (Environmental Compliance Approvals) must conform with this policy. In addition, decisions made by planning authorities under the Planning Act, 1990 must conform with this policy.
This prohibition takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-2 and MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEWG-4 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Municipality shall manage existing and future septic systems and septic system holding tanks where they would be a significant drinking water threat through the Ontario Building Code Act, 1992 and Ontario Regulation 315/10 (as amended) in accordance with the On-Site Sewage System Maintenance Inspections Program (MMAH, 2011, as updated). The Municipality shall also ensure that existing septic systems and septic system holding tanks are decommissioned where inspectors determine the need for replacement or when connecting to municipal services. This would require the tank to be pumped out and collapsed/backfilled. The leaching bed can degrade naturally.
Where existing or future septic systems or septic system holding tanks are or would be a significant threat (including large septic systems >10,000 L/day) the Municipality shall, within one year of the Plan taking effect, require connection to municipal sewer services (capacity permitting) by passing a Mandatory Connection By-law (under the authority of the Municipal Act, 2001) where services are available at the property line in the following situations:
Failure of a Phase II inspection;
Principal Authority deems the existing system inadequate to service a proposed redevelopment/renovation; or
For new development on existing vacant lots of record.
The Municipality shall also explore the potential of municipal servicing within the significant threat areas which currently have private services.
It is strongly recommended that the City of Ottawa explore the opportunity to deepen the Shadow Ridge Municipal Well to the Nepean aquifer to reduce the significant threats related to septic systems and septic system holding tanks in the Village of Greely within one year of the Plan taking effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-3 and MONITORING-5. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SEWG-5 |
For development of proposed lots or for any future development of properties with septic systems and/or septic system holding tanks that could be a significant drinking water threat, the responsible planning authority shall:
If relevant, require a lot grading plan to be prepared and submitted:
Ensure that the review process for future development and/or lot creation (especially lots less than 1 hectare) considers the protection of municipal source water (e.g. the lot size for any proposed development that would include a small on-site sewage system shall be based on the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change's Guidelines for Individual On-site Sewage Systems). The hydro-geological assessment to determine appropriate development density shall be conducted by a professional licensed to carry out that work (P.Geo. or P.Eng. with training in hydrogeology).
This policy takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-2. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEWG-6 |
Where existing and future large (>10000 L/day) on-site septic systems and septic system holding tanks are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval under the Ontario Water Resources Act, 1990 (as amended) includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that it ceases to be, or never becomes, a significant drinking water threat.
Instruments that exist before the day the Plan takes effect must be reviewed and, if necessary, amended within three years.
This policy takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SEWG-7 |
Approvals under the Ontario Water Resources Act, 1990, for the existing operation and maintenance of stormwater management facilities and the future establishment, operation and maintenance of stormwater management facilities outside of a Wellhead Protection Area A or Intake Protection Zone 1 where stormwater discharge would be a significant drinking water threat, shall be reviewed to ensure they contain conditions to protect sources of drinking water.
If the instrument does not meet these requirements, the MOECC shall amend it to include additional terms and conditions to manage the threat. It is recommended that conditions include:
All future facilities should be built to Enhanced Level Protection (as described in the Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual, MOECC 2003 as amended)
Addition of water quality criteria monitoring for the prescribed threat chemicals (pathogens, aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chloride, chromium VI, copper, glyphosate, lead,
mecoprop, mercury, nickel, nitrogen, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, petroleum hydrocarbons F1 to F4, total phosphorus, zinc) in addition to regular total suspended solids monitoring requirements to help develop a baseline for effluent quality and identify spikes in contaminants for future investigation
Ensure existing ponds are inspected yearly, and prioritize upgrades/retrofits to ponds/systems in vulnerable areas are prioritized
Sediment volumes should be measured yearly and provided to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change to ensure compliance
Naturalization around ponds to act as spill buffers
Contain a contingency plan for catastrophic events (>100 year flood) and emergency response
Instruments that exist before the day the Plan takes effect must be reviewed and, if necessary, amended within three years.
The future establishment, operation, and maintenance of a stormwater management facility is prohibited within the WHPA-A or IPZ-1 where stormwater discharges would be a significant drinking water threat. Accordingly, decisions relating to Prescribed Instruments (Environmental Compliance Approvals) must conform with these policies. In addition, decisions made by planning authorities under the Planning Act, 1990 must conform with these policies.
These policies take effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-2 and MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SLWA123-handlestorefuel-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
The Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) shall review Municipal Drinking Water Licenses and Permits issued under the Safe Drinking Water Act, in the vulnerable areas listed below where there is an existing or future significant drinking water threat of handling and storage of liquid fuels. The MOE shall ensure that the permits refer to the requirements of the Technical Standards and Safety Act (TSSA), liquid fuel handling code. This may include, but is not limited to, details concerning installation, operation and regular inspection of fuel storage tanks, how fuel is contained, the location of fuel, and how fuel is stored.
This applies to the existing and future significant threat of the above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels, in quantities listed below in the EBAs where modeling reported in the Assessment Report has demonstrated that this activity is a significant threat. Therefore this policy applies to:
The above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels (containing 2% benzene or more) in quantities of 15,000 L or greater in the Stoney PointIPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3, Lakeshore IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3, Windsor IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3 (upstream of intakes), Amherstburg IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3 (upstream of the intake, from the intake to vicinity of Turkey Creek, including Turkey Creek watershed), Harrow-Colchester IPZ-1, IPZ-2 andIPZ-3, Union IPZ-1, IPZ-2, IPZ-3 (Cedar/Wigle/Mill Creeks, Leamington Area Drainage), Pelee IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3, and Wheatley IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3 where the EBAs are applicable as shown in the assessment report.
The above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels (containing 2% benzene or more) in quantities of 34,000 L or greater in the Union IPZ-3 (Sturgeon Creek drainage), where the EBAs are applicable as shown in the assessment report.
The above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels (containing 2% benzene or more) in quantities of 15,000,000 L or greater in the Amherstburg IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 (downstream of the intake) where the EBAs are applicable as shown in the assessment report.
The above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels (containing 2% benzene or more) in quantities of 3,000,000 L or greater in the Amherstburg IPZ-3 (upstream of the intake, from vicinity of Turkey Creek to Upper Detroit River), Windsor IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 (downstream of the intakes) where the EBAs are applicable as shown in the assessment report.
The date of compliance for future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
SLWA123-handlestorefuel-1 (Specify Action) |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority (ERCA) will initiate the development of an inventory of fuel storage sites in order to identify significant threats, when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. ERCA will also encourage municipalities to update their Emergency Plans to include a response to fuel spills. The inventory of sites and updating of emergency plans will be targeted for completion by the end of 2015, and will continue to be updated as needed based on review at that time.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the handling and storage of fuel in the vulnerable areas:
All EBAs within IPZs in the Essex Region Source Protection Area |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SLWA123-handlestorefuel-1 (Stewardship/Incentive) |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority (ERCA) will apply for funding assistance from the Ministry of the Environment, when the Source Protection Plan takes effect, in order to undertake a stewardship and incentive program, funded by the Province, to encourage and assist the owners of above grade liquid fuel storage facilities, in replacing single walled tanks with double walled tanks, where not required by TSSA standards. Implementation will be conditional on availability of funding.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the handling and storage of fuel, in the vulnerable areas:
Stoney Point EBA
Lakeshore EBA
Windsor EBA,15,000L
Amherstburg EBA, 15,000L
Harrow-Colchester EBA
Union EBA, 15,000L; Union EBA, 34,000L
Pelee EBA
Wheatley EBA |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SLWA123-handlestorefuel-5 (Prescribed Instrument) |
The Ministry of Natural Resources (MNR) shall review instruments under the Aggregate Resources Act (including Aggregate Licenses, Wayside Permits, and Aggregate Permits and Site Plans) with respect to the handling and storage of liquid fuel at aggregate operation sites. The MNR shall ensure that the permits refer to the requirements of the Technical Standards and Safety Act (TSSA), liquid fuel handling code. This may include, but is not limited to, details concerning installation and operation of fuel storage tanks, how fuel is contained, the location of fuel, and how fuel is stored.
This applies to the existing and future significant threat of the above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels, in quantities listed below where modeling reported in the Assessment Report has demonstrated that this activity is a significant threat. Therefore this policy applies to:
- The above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels (containing 2% benzene or more) in quantities of 15,000 L or greater in the Stoney Point IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3, Lakeshore IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3, Windsor IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3 (upstream of intakes), Amherstburg IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3 (upstream of the intake, from the intake to vicinity of Turkey Creek, including Turkey Creek watershed), Harrow-Colchester IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3, Union IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3 (Cedar/Wigle/Mill Creeks, Leamington Area Drainage), Pelee IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3, and Wheatley IPZ-1, IPZ-2 and IPZ-3 where the EBAs are applicable as shown in the assessment report.
The above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels (containing 2% benzene or more) in quantities of 34,000 L or greater in the Union IPZ-3 (Sturgeon Creek drainage), where the EBAs are applicable as shown in the assessment report.
The above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels (containing 2% benzene or more) in quantities of 15,000,000 L or greater in the Amherstburg IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 (downstream of the intake) where the EBAs are applicable as shown in the assessment report.
The above grade handling and storage of liquid fuels (containing 2% benzene or more) in quantities of 3,000,000 L or greater in the Amherstburg IPZ-3 (upstream of the intake, from vicinity of Turkey Creek to Upper Detroit River), Windsor IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 (downstream of the intakes) where the EBAs are applicable as shown in the assessment report.
The date of compliance for future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Ministry of Natural Resources shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future, Future |
1 |
False |
|
SMF1 |
The application of agricultural source material, non-agricultural source material, or commercial fertilizer to land shall be prohibited by the Municipality where the threat from such activities could be significant in the areas where the policy applies. The prohibition, using a regulatory tool deemed appropriate and enforceable by the Municipality, shall take effect no later than one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect and shall apply to all existing and future activities.
The policy shall apply for the named activities in the following vulnerable areas:
The application of agricultural source material to land AND the application of non-agricultural source material to land:
Callander IPZ-1 and 2;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
North Bay IPZ-1;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1).
The application of commercial fertilizer to land:
Callander IPZ1;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the
exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SMF2 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect the Municipality shall prohibit the future uses of land as listed below where the threat from such uses would be significant in the areas where this policy applies. A Municipality's official plan and zoning by-law in effect for the vulnerable areas shall be reviewed and amended, as necessary, as required under Section 26 of the Planning Act, to implement this prohibition. The uses to be prohibited include:
1. The storage of agricultural source material.
2. The handling and storage of non-agricultural source material.
3. The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer.
4. The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard.
The policy applies in the following vulnerable areas:
Callander IPZ-1 and 2;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
North Bay IPZ-1;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SNO-1 |
Where the storage of snow is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the following actions shall be taken:
1) The storage of snow is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat is, or would be significant, in any of the following areas: WHPA-A (existing, future)
2) The storage of snow is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, where the threat is significant in any of the following areas: WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or WHPA-E (VS ≥ 9) (existing, future); or The remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing, future). Without limiting other requirements, risk management plans shall include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the storage of snow, and associated runoff, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. Notwithstanding the above, emergency snow storage may be permitted outside of WHPA-A as determined by the risk management official and the municipality responsible for snow storage in the absence of a Risk Management Plan. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SNO1 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Municipality or shall prohibit the future use of land as a snow storage facility or snow dump (areas where snow is likely to be transported from offsite) in vulnerable areas where the threat from their establishment could be significant. An official plan and zoning by-law in effect for the vulnerable areas shall be reviewed and amended, as necessary, as required under Section 26 of the Planning Act to implement this prohibition.
The policy applies in the following vulnerable areas:
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SNOW(ICA)-1 |
With the exception of personal domestic use, the existing and future storage of snow is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within WHPA-A of the ICA. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, and shall ensure that the storage of snow ceases to be or does not become a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
SNOW-1 |
The existing storage of snow is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan, where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards and shall ensure that the storage of snow and associated run-off ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SNOW-2 |
Future storage of snow is designated for purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. Except in emergency situations as determined by the risk management official and the public works department, emergency snow storage will be permitted only outside of WHPA-A. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
SOLV-1 |
The existing handling and storage of organic solvents is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards and include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SOLV-2 |
The future handling and storage of organic solvents is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
SOLV-3 |
The MOE is encouraged to consider undertaking research into organic solvent alternatives that can be used to phase out their use within vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant, moderate or low drinking water threat in the Province of Ontario. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
SSM-ASM-NASM-F-1.1 |
Education and outreach materials will be developed for landowners within WHPA-A to define ASM and NASM and their acceptable volumes for use. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-de-icing-F-1.2 |
The management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA and requires a Risk Management Plan within all vulnerable areas where it would be a significant threat.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, excluding residential, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use in all areas where the management of run-off that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft would be significant - all WHPA-As. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-DNAPL-F-2.2 |
The storage and handling of DNAPLs (future) are designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the CWA Prohibition in the vulnerable areas WHPA - A, WHPA - B. Residential uses and the storage and handling of DNAPLs at retail sales establishments are excluded from this prohibition.
The storage and handling of DNAPLs (future) are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA requiring Risk Management Plans in WHPA-C, excluding residential.
The storage and handling of DNAPLs (existing) are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA requiring Risk Management Plans in WHPA- A, WHPA-B and WHPA-C, excluding residential.
Retail sales storage and handling of DNAPLs (existing and future) is designated for the purposes of Section 58 Risk Management Plans under the CWA in the WHPA-A, B, C.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, excluding residential, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use, in WHPA-A, B and C where the storage and handling of DNAPLs would be significant.
Education and outreach information outlining safe handling and storage practices for DNAPL's will be developed for distribution for all land owners within the WHPA-A, B, C. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-fert-F-1.1 |
The handling and storage of commercial fertilizer is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act requiring a Risk Management Plan in the areas where the threat would be significant (all WHPA-As). Residential uses of Commercial fertilizer are excluded from the Risk Management Plan requirement.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, excluding residential, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use in all areas where the handling, storage and application of commercial fertilizer would be significant - all WHPA-As.
Education and outreach materials will be developed for landowners in all WHPA-As. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Fuel-E-1.2 |
The handling and storage of fuel is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA, requiring a Risk Management Plan in the areas where the threat exists and is significant - Goulais well WHPA-A.
The RMP will include at a minimum:
* Adherence at a minimum to Technical Standards and Safety Association (TSSA) standards as regularly updated
* Best management practices
* Measures to ensure site drainage is away from the Goulais well
* Leakage alarm system
* Standard operating procedures for shut down
* Maintenance and monitoring protocol
* Spills response plan
* Enhanced tank safety requirements
* Abandonment plan |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Fuel-F-1.1 |
Fuel storage and handling is designated for the purposes of Section 57 Prohibition of the CWA in the areas where the threat would be significant - all WHPA-As, excluding the existing threat activity in the Goulais well WHPA-A.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, excluding residential, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use in all areas where the handling and storage of fuel would be significant - all WHPA-As. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-HCPipeline-F-2.0 |
City of Sault Ste. Marie and the Township of Prince shall develop a coordinated response plan with fuel pipeline owners to ensure prompt and effective communication in the event of a spill of any fuel within the area where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat
The coordinated response plan shall include procedures to notify the municipal drinking water system operator, MECP Spills Action Centre and local emergency responders.
The municipal drinking water system operator shall participate in developing a coordinated response plan for all future spills/leaks/ruptures.
|
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-HVA-E/F-1.0 |
Part A - The City of Sault Ste. Marie and the Sault North Planning Board are encouraged to protect the Highly Vulnerable Aquifers through Official Plan policies pertaining to Source Water that restrict uses that are associated with the following threat activities:
• Fuel Storage and Handling
• Handling and Storage of Organic Solvents
• Handling and Storage of DNAPLs
• The establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage, threat subcategory: sewage system or sewage works – discharge of stormwater from a stormwater retention pond.
All planning decisions must have regard for this policy. The Official Plan should be updated to appropriately reflect this policy in accordance with section 26 of the Planning Act.
Part B - The City of Sault Ste. Marie is encouraged to continue with Best Management Practices (BMP) in regard to road salt application and is encouraged to seek strategies to optimise the use of road salt to recognise source water protection and public safety in the Highly Vulnerable Aquifer areas.
The Ministry of Transportation is encouraged to continue with Best Management Practices (BMP) in regard to road salt application and is encouraged to seek strategies to optimise the use of road salt to recognise source water protection and public safety in the Highly Vulnerable Aquifer areas.
Part C - Education and outreach materials should be developed and delivered to owners/operators of properties and businesses as well as residents within the HVA, to address the handling/storage of fuel, handling/storage of organic solvents, handling/storage of DNAPLs, road salt management, as well as the discharge of stormwater from stormwater management facilities.
|
Sault Ste Marie |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-lives-F-1.1 |
Utilizing authorities under the Planning Act, the municipality shall not permit any use that include livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard in the vulnerable areas where it could be a significant threat - all WHPA-As. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-orgsolvents-F-1.1 |
The handling and storage of organic solvents (future) are designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the CWA Prohibition in vulnerable areas where the threat could be significant (all WHPA-As) except retail sales establishments.
The handling and storage of organic solvents (existing) are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA requiring Risk Management Plans in vulnerable areas where the threat could be significant (all WHPA-As). Risk Management Plans are required for retail sales (future and existing) located within the vulnerable areas where the activity would be significant.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, excluding residential, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use, in all WHPA-A, where the storage and handling of organic solvents would be significant.
Information on safe handling and storage practices for organic solvents will be developed for distribution to all property owners within all WHPA-As. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-pest-E/F-1.1 |
The handling and storage of pesticides is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA requiring Risk Management Plans in vulnerable areas where the threat would be significant, all WHPA-As. Residential uses of pesticides are excluded from the Risk Management Plan requirement.
The application of pesticides is designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the CWA Prohibition in the areas where the threat would be significant - all WHPA-As. Residential uses of pesticides are excluded from this prohibition.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use in all areas where the handling and storage of pesticides and the application of pesticides would be significant (all WHPA-As), excluding residential.
Education and outreach materials will be developed for landowners in all WHPA-As. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Salt-E/F-1.4 |
The municipality shall update the Road Salt Management Plan to recognize the need for prevention of source water contamination in WHPA-A.
The municipality shall review the Road Salt Management Plan on an annual basis with respect to Best Management Practices as they pertain to source water protection.
Education and outreach program shall be directed toward high density residential, commercial, institutional and industrial land owners within the vulnerable areas.
|
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Salt-F-2.2 |
Storage and handling of road salt is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA requiring a Risk Management Plan for salt storage facilities within vulnerable areas where the activity would be a significant threat, all WHPA-As. Risk Management Plans will not apply to low density residential uses.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use in vulnerable area where the activity would be a significant threat - all WHPA-A's, excluding low density residential. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Sewage-E-1.4 |
The municipality shall:
a) Develop and implement a repair procedure and parts inventory checklist for the sanitary force main within the wellhead protection area (WHPA-A) of the Lorna well.
b) Develop and implement a training plan for Public Works staff detailing vulnerable areas, and emergency response requirements in the event of a leak in the force main within WHPA-A of the Lorna well.
c) Prepare an emergency response plan for the force main that shall include a procedure to notify the Municipal Drinking Water System Operator. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Sewage-F-1.2 |
1) The Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that all new applications under their regulations for establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage (excluding septic systems) be evaluated to ensure new applications or modifications to existing Environmental Compliance Approvals formerly Certificates of Approval do not result in the creation of a significant threat within all WHPA-A.
2) The municipality shall ensure that all future development within the WHPA-A prohibit the use of septic systems. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Snow-E-1.1 |
The City of Sault Ste. Marie shall update the Road Salt Management Plan to ensure that municipal best management practices are used for the existing municipal snow storage site where it could be a significant threat, including:
Maximize snow storage in the portions of the existing snow storage site that are outside of the WHPA-A
Ensure melt water drainage flows away from the Lorna WHPA-A
Education and training for municipal staff involved in snow storage
The municipality is encouraged to undertake a soil sampling and testing program on site utilizing available funding opportunities. Sampling results may indicate the need to
revise snow storage practices. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-snow-F-2.1 |
Snow storage is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA requiring a Risk Management Plan for snow storage sites for the areas where it would be a significant threat, all WHPA-As, except for the existing municipal snow storage site in the Lorna WHPA A.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, excluding residential, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use in all areas where snow storage would be significant (all WHPA-As).
Education and outreach materials will be developed for snow storage for commercial and institutional land uses. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Trans-E-2.1 |
City of Sault Ste. Marie and the Township of Prince shall develop a coordinated response plan to ensure prompt and effective communication in the event of a spill of any fuel or potassic fertilizer within the area where these threats were identified as significant drinking water threats through the modelling approach.
The plan shall include procedures to notify the Municipal Drinking Water System Operator. The Plan shall include outreach to local and international emergency responders.
The municipal drinking water system operator shall participate in developing a coordinated response plan. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Waste-F-2.3 |
Prohibit the operation or establishment of waste disposal sites as defined in Part V of the Environmental Protection Act where the threat could be significant (WHPA-A and WHPA-B).
*Within the meaning of Part V Environmental Protection Act waste disposal sites may include areas for the temporary storage, landfilling, application to land, and injection of waste into a well. The types of wastes include: domestic waste, hazardous waste, liquid industrial waste, PCBs, petroleum waste, and untreated septage. Sites may be operated by an individual, by a municipality or by a commercial entity. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Waste-F-2.4 |
Through the Planning Act, the municipality shall prohibit the operation of establishment of the following future waste disposal sites in areas where the threat could be significant (WHPA-A and WHPA-B):
Application of untreated septage to land;
Storage, treatment and discharge of tailing from mines;
Land farming of petroleum refining waste;
Land filling of hazardous waste;
Land filling of municipal waste;
Land filling of solid, non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste;
Liquid industrial waste injection in to a well
PCB (Polychlorinated biphenyl) waste storage
Storage of hazardous waste at disposal sites; and
Storage of certain hazardous wastes.
Sites that do not require an environmental compliance approval are exempt from this policy and are subject to Policy SSM-Waste-F-2.5. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SSM-Waste-F-2.5 |
Existing and future waste disposal sites that do not require approval under the Environmental Protection Act or Environmental Compliance Approval are designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the CWA requiring Risk Management Plans in vulnerable areas where the threat could be significant (WHPA-A and WHPA-B). The policy addresses the following threat sub categories:
Waste Disposal Site - PCB Waste Storage;
Waste Disposal Site - Storage of Hazardous Waste at disposal Sites; and
Waste Disposal Site - Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste under Ontario Regulation 347/09.
All land uses in zoning by-law 2005-150 as amended, excluding residential, are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the CWA Restricted Land Use, where a waste disposal site would be a significant threat. |
Sault Ste Marie |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SVA1 |
In accordance with Section 22 (7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities (SP Authorities), should design a sign to the appropriate provincial standards, to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within a Wellhead Protection Area with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or within an Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
Municipalities may install additional signs at locations of their choice and will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of them.
The signs should be consistent with those designed by the Ministry of Transportation and should be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial
roads are located within a Wellhead Protection Area with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or an Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 8 or
higher.
The above policies should be implemented as part of an overall Education
and Outreach plan within the Source Protection Area. This policy, in
conjunction with additional Education and Outreach policies, should be
implemented within two years after the effective date of the Plan. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-1 |
A prioritized maintenance inspection program for septic systems, including holding tanks, governed under the Building Code Act in locations where the threat is, or would be, significant, shall be implemented by the municipality or Principal Authority under the Ontario Building Code no later than January 2017. Inspection efforts should be prioritized based on systems that pose the greatest risk to sources of drinking water, such as the oldest systems or those in any of the areas of highest vulnerability:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timeline:
T-13: A prioritized maintenance inspection program shall be in effect no later than January 2017. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-10 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to develop guidelines for managing significant drinking water threats from septic systems with subsurface disposal of effluent, as regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act, for distribution to developers, municipalities and other interested or affected parties in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens, Sodium or Chloride (existing, future).
Timeline:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-11 |
1) Discharge, including infiltration, from a stormwater management facility shall be prohibited into an area where the discharge would be a significant drinking water threat in the following area:
WHPA-A (future).
2) Where the discharge from a stormwater management facility is in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens or Chloride (existing, future).
Not limiting any other conditions to be included in the Environmental Compliance Approval, the Issuing Director should include the following conditions, where possible:
no stormwater is discharged from the pond into a WHPA-E where it would be classified as a significant drinking water threat;
existing infiltration ponds are lined to prevent infiltration of contaminants; and
in an Issue Contributing Area for Chloride, require actions to reduce salt loading into the pond from upstream lands where the application of road salt occurs.
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-12 |
1) The use of land for the establishment of a new stormwater management facility shall be prohibited where the discharge (including infiltration) of stormwater would be into a significant threat area in:
WHPA-A (future).
2) New development dependent on septic systems with subsurface disposal of effluent, as regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act, in an area where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, shall only be permitted where it has been demonstrated by the proponent through an approved Environmental Assessment or similar planning process that the location for the septic system is the preferred alternative and the safety of the drinking water system has been assured in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens, Sodium or Chloride (future). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-13 |
Where sanitary sewers and related pipes are in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Not limiting any other conditions to be included in the Environmental Compliance Approval, the Issuing Director should include the following conditions, where possible:
requiring higher construction standards; and
inspections by the owner for leaks.
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-14 |
New development dependent on sanitary sewers and related pipes, in an area where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, shall only be permitted where it has been demonstrated by the proponent through an approved Environmental Assessment or similar planning process that the location for the sanitary sewer and related pipes is the preferred alternative and the safety of the drinking water system has been assured in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-15 |
1) The storage of sewage shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) Where facilities for the storage of sewage are in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 8) (existing, future); or
WHPA-C (VS = 8) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-16 |
1) The use of land for the establishment of facilities for the storage of sewage shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-E (VS ≥ 9) (future); or
WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) The use of land for the establishment of facilities for the storage of sewage, in an area where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, shall only be permitted where it has been demonstrated by the proponent through an approved Environmental Assessment or similar planning process that the location for the storage of sewage is the preferred alternative and the safety of the drinking water system has been assured in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS ≥ 8) (future); or
WHPA-C (VS = 8) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-17 |
1) Future sewage works shall be prohibited where the establishment, operation and maintenance of sewage works would be a significant drinking water threat, where the sewage works discharge is to surface water from:
a) Combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water; and
b) Sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water, in any of the following areas:
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (future); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
c) Industrial effluent discharges, in any of the following areas:
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (future); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens or Chloride (future).
d) Sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons), in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (future); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) Where sewage works are in an area where the activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the activity shall be reviewed to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where the sewage works discharge is to surface water from:
a) Combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water; and
b) Sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water, in any of the following areas:
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing);
c) Industrial effluent discharges, in any of the following areas:
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens or Chloride (existing).
d) Sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons), in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing).
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-18 |
Development dependent on the establishment of sewage works shall be prohibited where sewage works would be a significant drinking water threat where the sewage works discharge is to surface water from:
a) Combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water; and
b) Sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water, in any of the following areas:
WHPA-E (VS ≥ 8) (future); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
c) Industrial effluent discharges, in any of the following areas:
WHPA-E (VS ≥ 8) (future); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens or Chloride (future).
d) Sewage treatment plant effluent discharges (includes lagoons), in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS ≥ 8) (future); or
In any WHPA-E in an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-19 |
The Town of Orangeville shall undertake research to determine the extent to which the sodium and chloride loading from the Town's Water Pollution Control Plant (WPCP) outfall into WHPA-E for Well 10 influences the rising sodium and chloride levels measured at this well and report back to the Credit Valley Source Protection Authority (CVSPA) within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
The CVSPA in partnership with the Town of Orangeville shall provide the report along with recommendations to the CTC Source Protection Committee to determine whether to make a formal request to the Director pursuant to section 119 of the Technical Rules: Assessment Report under the Clean Water Act, 2006 dated November 2009 to add this WPCP outfall as a Local Threat. If the WPCP outfall is added as a Local Threat then policies SWG-17 and SWG-18 shall apply. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-2 |
The Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks should develop and produce education and outreach materials which shall be delivered by local municipalities to landowners with septic systems, including holding tanks, governed under the Building Code Act within significant threat areas that explains the rationale for the maintenance inspection program and the benefits of regular maintenance and properly functioning septic systems where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing, future).
Timeline:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-3 |
Municipalities shall adopt Official Plan policies that require the enactment or amendment of Site Plan Control By-laws containing provisions for the siting and design of septic systems, including holding tanks, governed under the Building Code Act, 1992 as amended, as follows:
Site Plan Control is required for existing vacant lots of record to ensure that the siting and design of on-site septic systems, including the siting of future reserve bed locations, is optimized in relation to significant drinking water threats in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-4 |
1) No new lots requiring septic systems, including holding tanks, governed under the Building Code Act shall be created where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in the following area:
WHPA-A (future)
2) New lots requiring septic systems, including holding tanks, governed under the Building Code Act in an area where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat shall only be permitted if the municipality is satisfied that the activity will not become a significant drinking water threat. The hydrogeological assessment to determine appropriate development density shall be conducted by a professional licensed to carry out that work in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
Timelines:
T-8: Official plans shall be amended for conformity with the Source Protection Plan within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or at the time of the next review in accordance with s.26 of the Planning Act, whichever occurs first. Zoning by-laws shall be amended within 3 years after the approval of the official plan.
T-9:Decisions on planning matters shall conform with the policy immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-5 |
The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing is requested to amend the Building Code Act to permit municipalities to require higher standards for septic systems governed under the Building Code Act to deal with nitrate and pathogen threats where they would be a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
Timeline:
T-18: The policy shall be implemented immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-6 |
Where municipal sanitary sewers and capacity are available, the municipality is encouraged to pass by-laws under the Municipal Act to require mandatory connections to the municipal sewer system for new development and existing septic systems, including holding tanks, governed under the Building Code Act and the Ontario Water Resources Act, and the decommissioning of existing systems, where they are a significant drinking water threat located in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens, Sodium* or Chloride* (existing, future) (*not applicable to systems subject to BCA).
Timelines:
T-15: The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-7 |
The municipality in cooperation with local health units and Source Protection Authorities shall provide education and outreach materials for septic systems governed under the Ontario Water Resources Act (existing) to landowners in the entire Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride regarding:
a) the use of more efficient water softeners to reduce the discharge of salt to the septic system; and
b) promoting best management practices to ensure outdoor taps are not connected to the softened water line.
Timeline:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-8 |
1) Septic systems with subsurface disposal of effluent, as regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act, shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in the following area:
WHPA-A (future)
2) Where septic systems with subsurface disposal of effluent, as regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act, are in an area where the activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens, Sodium or Chloride (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
SWG-9 |
1) New development dependent on septic systems with subsurface disposal of effluent, as regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act, shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in the following area:
WHPA-A (future)
2) New development dependent on septic systems with subsurface disposal of effluent, as regulated by the Ontario Water Resources Act, in an area where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, shall only be permitted where it has been demonstrated by the proponent through an approved Environmental Assessment or similar planning process that the location for the septic system is the preferred alternative and the safety of the drinking water system has been assured in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates, Pathogens, Sodium or Chloride (future). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-1 |
Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-1-C-a |
Where the future establishment of waste disposal sites, as defined within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall prohibit this activity. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-10 |
Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-10-C-a |
In consideration of site plan approval for properties located partially within vulnerable areas where the future establishment of septic systems requiring approval under the Environmental Protection Act would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. where possible, the municipal planning authority shall require the applicants to locate the septic systems outside of the vulnerable areas to ensure they will not be significant drinking water threats. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-11 |
Incentives shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-11-C-a |
Where future septic systems requiring approval under the Ontario Building Code would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the Region of Halton, the Town of Milton and the City of Hamilton shall require through amendments to Planning Act tools that future lot sizes be sufficient to accommodate the systems. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-12 |
Research shall be initiated within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, contingent on funding. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-12-S-a |
For consistency of planning documents across the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region where future septic systems requiring approval under the Ontario Building Code would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the Niagara Escarpment Commission is requested to ensure that future lot sizes in the Niagara Escarpment Plan Area are sufficient to accommodate the required private systems.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-13 |
A prioritized maintenance inspection program shall be in effect no later than January 2017. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-13-C-a |
To increase awareness about best practices to protect drinking water sources for existing and future users of septic tanks and holding tanks located within vulnerable areas where their use is or would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton shall continue their established, related education and outreach programs. In addition, within two years of the date the updated Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton, in collaboration with the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities, and the Town of Milton are requested to continue and broaden education and outreach programs for newly identified threats as well. The programs should inform landowners about the proper disposal of toxic chemicals, the operation and maintenance of septic systems, water softener discharges, and the benefits of installing effluent filters, performing tank inspections, and having tanks pumped out regularly.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-14 |
The policy shall be complied with within 180 days from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-14-C-a |
In support of the sewage system inspection requirements of the Ontario Building Code specific to vulnerable areas where existing sewage systems are significant drinking water threats,
a. the Town of Milton and the City of Hamilton shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program, as required. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-15 |
The policy shall be considered within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-15-S-a |
Where septic systems and holding tanks are used within municipal service areas and where their use is a significant drinking water threat,
a. landowners are requested to decommission existing septic systems and holding tanks and connect to municipal sewage works where municipal services are provided, connections are permitted, and where municipal servicing capacity is available. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-16 |
The policy shall be initiated within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-16-S-a |
To assist landowners in reducing the risks to drinking water sources where existing septic systems and holding tanks are significant threats,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to provide ongoing funding through the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program or a similar program for septic system upgrades and replacements, holding tank replacements with septic systems, decommissioning of unused systems, and for connection to municipal sewage works.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-16-S-b |
To assist landowners in reducing the risks to drinking water sources where existing septic systems and holding tanks are significant threats,
b. if funding is provided by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks or municipalities, the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities shall implement the incentive program to reduce the risk of septic system and holding tank drinking water threats. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-17 |
The policy shall be implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-17-C-a |
To assist landowners with improvements required under the on-site sewage systems maintenance inspection program implemented where sewage systems are significant threats and in accordance with the Ontario Building Code,
a. the City of Hamilton, the Region of Halton, and the Town of Milton shall consider the creation of a financial assistance program. It is recommended that this program be designed in a manner that allows the work to be completed as required, and the landowner to repay the cost over time. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-18 |
The policy shall be implemented immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-18-C-a |
Where existing and future septic systems requiring approval under the Ontario Water Resources Act or the Environmental Protection Act are or would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the municipality responsible for wastewater services may consider connections to municipal wastewater services for rural properties where the septic systems have failed and where all other mitigation measures have been explored (including the replacement of the systems and/or installation of advanced private treatment facilities) to the satisfaction of the municipality and found unsuitable, or where the municipality considers connection to municipal wastewater services for future development to be most appropriate, and where the connections are permitted by provincial and municipal planning policy. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-19-C-a |
Where potential future sewage treatment plant bypasses would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the municipalities responsible for stormwater systems are requested to implement programs which address connections of stormwater sources to sanitary sewers in order to reduce surges in volumes to sewage treatment plants during wet weather. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-2 |
Prescribed Instruments (existing), where prohibited, shall not be renewed when the current Prescribed Instrument expires, and the significant threat activity to which the Prescribed Instrument pertains, shall cease no later than 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-2-C-a |
To raise awareness about appropriate disposal of hazardous materials at waste disposal sites where they would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton shall continue their established education and outreach programs on hazardous waste disposal and reduction of waste. In addition, within two years of the date the updated Source Protection Plan comes into effect, they shall include messaging for newly identified threats consistent with source water protection and the diligent use and disposal of substances identified in the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Park’s most recent Tables of Drinking Water Threats, such as organic solvents, pesticides, and dense non-aqueous phase liquids.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-20-C-a |
Where the existing and potential future application and storage of agricultural source material (ASM) on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act are or would be significant drinking water threats,
a. a risk management official shall screen all building permit and Planning Act applications in accordance with policy G-2 for properties zoned for agricultural use within vulnerable areas.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-20-C-b |
Where the existing and potential future application and storage of
agricultural source material (ASM) on farms not phased-in under the
Nutrient Management Act are or would be significant drinking water
threats,
b. a risk management official shall establish risk management plans
with persons undertaking or proposing to undertake the activities of
the application or storage of agricultural source material. The
implementation of these risk management plans shall be overseen
by a risk management inspector. Their content shall be based upon
the regulatory requirements of a nutrient management plan and
strategy under the Nutrient Management Act and be scoped to
address these specific threats. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-21-C-a |
Where the existing and potential future application or storage of agricultural source material are or would be significant drinking water threats and are managed by nutrient management plans and strategies,
a. the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that the nutrient management plans and strategies are inclusive of measures to protect drinking water sources that, when implemented, will ensure that the application and storage of agricultural source material never become or cease to be significant drinking water threats. Contingency plans required for nutrient management plans and strategies must contain the requirement for notification of the Spills Action Centre if a leak is discovered from an agricultural source material storage facility or if there is a spill. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-22-S-a |
To monitor compliance with nutrient management plans and strategies, non-agricultural source material plans, and Ontario Regulation 267/03 requirements for properties located within vulnerable areas where there are now or potentially would be significant drinking water threats due to the application and storage of agricultural source materials, non-agricultural source materials, commercial fertilizer, and land used for outdoor confinement areas and farm-animal yards,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to conduct regular compliance inspections of agricultural operations where significant drinking water threats occur, and shall guide farmers to improve compliance performance, when needed.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-23-S-a |
As an incentive to reduce the existing significant risks from the application and storage of agricultural source materials, and from land used for livestock grazing, pasturing land, outdoor confinement areas, and farm-animal yards,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks is requested to continue to provide ongoing funding for stewardship projects on properties where these activities are a significant threat.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-23-S-b |
As an incentive to reduce the existing significant risks from the application and storage of agricultural source materials, and from land used for livestock grazing, pasturing land, outdoor confinement areas, and farm-animal yards,
b. if funding is provided by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks, the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities shall implement the incentive program. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-24-C-a |
Where the future application, or handling and storage of non-agricultural source material would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that non-agricultural source material plans (NASM plans) required under the Nutrient Management Act include measures that, when implemented, will ensure that these activities never become significant drinking water threats. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-25-C-a |
Where the future application of commercial fertilizer on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act, and the storage of commercial fertilizer on farms, at retail establishments, and on other properties would be significant drinking water threats,
a. a risk management official shall screen all building permit and Planning Act applications in accordance with policy G-2 for properties where there would be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-25-C-b |
Where the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer on
farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act, and where the
handling and storage of commercial fertilizer on properties would be
significant drinking water threats,
b. a risk management official shall establish risk management plans
with persons proposing to undertake the activities of the application
or storage of commercial fertilizer. The implementation of these risk
management plans shall be overseen by a risk management
inspector and their content based upon the regulatory requirements
of a nutrient management plan under the Nutrient Management Act
and best management practices, and scoped to address these
specific threats. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-26-C-a |
Where the existing and future application of commercial fertilizer would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that nutrient management plans required under the Nutrient Management Act include measures that, when implemented, will ensure that this activity never becomes or ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-27-C-a |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of commercial fertilizer would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton shall continue their established, related education and outreach programs. In addition, within two years of the date that the updated Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton, in collaboration with the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities, are requested to develop and implement education and outreach programs for newly identified threats to promote best management practices regarding these activities for the protection of source water. The target audience will be golf courses, fertilizer application technicians, home and business owners, and retail establishments that apply or store commercial fertilizer.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-28-C-a |
For golf course properties located where the existing and future application, or storage and handling of commercial fertilizers would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the municipal planning authority shall encourage all operators to obtain and retain Audubon Co-operative Sanctuary Certification. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-29-C-a |
Where the future handling and storage of pesticide would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. a risk management official shall screen all building permit and Planning Act applications in accordance with policy G-2 for properties where there would be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-29-C-b |
Where the future handling and storage of pesticide would be a significant drinking water threat,
b. a risk management official shall establish risk management plans
with persons proposing to undertake the activities of the handling
and storage of pesticide. The implementation of these risk
management plans shall be overseen by a risk management
inspector. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-29-S-d |
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
|
2 |
False |
|
T-3 |
The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-3-C-a |
Where the future establishment of waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the City of Hamilton shall prohibit through amendments to Planning
Act tools the establishment of waste disposal sites with the following
specific activities occurring - application of untreated septage to
land; storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines;
landfarming of petroleum refining waste; landfilling of hazardous
waste; landfilling of municipal waste; landfilling of solid, nonhazardous,
industrial or commercial waste; injection of liquid waste
into a well; polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) waste storage; and
storage of hazardous waste.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-3-C-c |
Where the future establishment of waste disposal sites within the
meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act would be a
significant drinking water threat,
c. the risk management official for the Region of Halton shall screen all
building permit and Planning Act applications in accordance with
policy G-2 for waste disposal site activities exempt from
Environmental Compliance Approvals under Ontario Regulation 347
and prohibit these activities from occurring to ensure they never
become significant threats. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-30-S-a |
Where the future handling and storage of pesticide would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Agrichemical Warehousing Standards Association is requested to review their standards to ensure they include appropriate buffer areas and emergency planning and response measures to protect municipal drinking water sources.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-31-C-a |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of pesticide are significant drinking water threats,
a. the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton shall continue their established, related education and outreach programs. In addition, within two years of the date that the updated Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton, in collaboration with the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities, are requested to undertake an education and outreach program for newly identified threats on pesticide use and storage methods and their potential impacts on drinking water sources. It is recommended that the outreach program include wellhead protection area mapping and target pesticide applicators and exterminators, golf course operators, and farmers.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-32-C-a |
Where the future handling and storage of road salt would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. within a wellhead protection area and issue contributing area, the Region of Halton, Town of Milton, Town of Halton Hills, and the City of Hamilton shall prohibit through Planning Act tools salt storage facilities with greater than 5,000 tonnes of capacity.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-32-C-b |
Where the future handling and storage of road salt would be a significant drinking water threat
b. within an issue contributing area a risk management official shall
establish risk management plans with persons proposing to construct
salt storage facilities of 5,000 tonnes or less. The implementation of
these risk management plans shall be overseen by a risk
management inspector. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-33-S-a |
For consistency of planning documents across the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region where the future handling and storage of road salt would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Niagara Escarpment Commission is requested to prohibit salt storage and handling facilities with capacity greater than 5,000 tonnes in the Niagara Escarpment Plan Area where the handling and storage of salt would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-34-C-a |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of road salt would be a significant drinking water threat in a wellhead protection area, intake protection zone or issue contributing area,
a. the City of Hamilton, Regional Municipality of Halton, Town of Milton, Town of Halton Hills, Town of Oakville, City of Burlington shall continue their established, related education and outreach programs. In addition, within two years of the date that the updated Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton, in collaboration with the City of Burlington and Towns of Milton, Halton Hills and Oakville in Halton Region, are requested to develop and implement education and outreach programs for the private and public sector, as well as the general public, about the impacts of road salt on drinking water sources and the use of best management practices. It is recommended that the key messages be the efficient use of road salts and the use of alternatives to help address newly identified threats.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-34-S-a |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of
road salt would be a significant, moderate or low drinking water threat
in a wellhead protection area, intake protection zone or issue
contributing area,
a. within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan comes
into effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton, in
collaboration with the City of Burlington and Towns of Milton, Halton
Hills and Oakville in Halton Region, are requested to develop and
implement education and outreach programs for the private and
public sector, as well as the general public, about the impacts of road
salt on drinking water sources and the use of best management
practices. It is recommended that the key messages be the efficient
use of road salts and the use of alternatives. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-35-C-a |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of road salt would be significant drinking water threats,
a. within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the municipalities shall amend their salt management plans to identify the location of wellhead protection areas, issue contributing areas, and intake protection zones and to enhance best management practices in these areas.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-35-S-a |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of
road salt would be significant, moderate or low drinking water threats,
a. within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan comes
into effect, the municipalities shall amend their salt management
plans to identify the location of wellhead protection areas, issue
contributing areas, and intake protection zones and to enhance best
management practices in these areas. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-36-S-a |
To seek collaboration on the use of best practices for the application of road salt on Provincial roads where this activity could be a significant, moderate or low drinking water threat,
a. the Ministry of Transportation and their supporting de-icing contractors are requested to continue the proactive implementation of their salt management plans and to continue the use of best management practices within wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-36-S-b |
To seek collaboration on the use of best practices for the application of
road salt on Provincial roads where this activity could be a significant,
moderate or low drinking water threat,
b. the Ministry of Transportation is requested to update their salt
management plan, as required, to ensure consistency with the most
current versions of Environment Canada’s Code of Practice for the
Environmental Management of Road Salts and the Transportation
Association of Canada’s Syntheses of Best Practices. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-36-S-c |
To seek collaboration on the use of best practices for the application of
road salt on Provincial roads where this activity could be a significant,
moderate or low drinking water threat,
c. the Ministry of Transportation should continue their ongoing
investigation and implementation of innovative practices and new
mitigative technologies regarding road salt application and the
management of infiltration and runoff. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-36-S-d |
To seek collaboration on the use of best practices for the application of
road salt on Provincial roads where this activity could be a significant,
moderate or low drinking water threat,
d. the Ministry of Transportation is requested to actively consider the
creation of a pilot project utilizing new practices and mitigative
technologies for road salt application or the management of runoff
that could benefit drinking water sources within the HaltonHamilton Source Protection Region. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-37-C-a |
Where the future storage of snow would be a significant drinking water threat
a. in a wellhead protection area and issue contributing area, the Region of Halton, the Towns of Milton and Halton Hills and the City of Hamilton shall prohibit through Planning Act tools snow storage facilities that are at or above grade at greater than one hectare in size or, below grade, at or greater than 0.01 hectare in size. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-38-S-a |
For consistency of planning documents across the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region where the future storage of snow would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Niagara Escarpment Commission is requested to prohibit future snow storage facilities in the Niagara Escarpment Plan Area. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-39-C-a |
Where the future storage of snow would be a significant drinking water threat in an issue contributing area,
a. the municipal planning authority shall require at site plan approval that best management practices for site design to protect drinking water sources be included to manage snow storage and the associated melt water at snow storage facilities at or above grade between 0.01 and 1 hectare in size. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-4-C-a |
For future systems that would discharge stormwater from stormwater management facilities where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the environmental compliance approvals that govern the systems include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the systems do not become significant drinking water threats. As part of its program to review environmental compliance approvals that are affected by source protection plans the following conditions shall be considered for inclusion - the requirement for regular maintenance, periodic removal of accumulated sediment, lining of the pond where warranted, the use of an oil/water separator, and other requirements to address site conditions.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-40-C-a |
Where existing and potential future handling and storage of fuel are or would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the risk management official shall screen all building permit and Planning Act applications in accordance with policy G-2 within these vulnerable areas.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-40-C-b |
Where existing and potential future handling and storage of fuel are or
would be significant drinking water threats,
b. the risk management official shall establish risk management plans
with persons undertaking or proposing to undertake the handling
and storage of fuel under Ontario Regulation 213/01 and under
Ontario Regulation 217/01, except home fuel oil tanks. The
implementation of these risk management plans shall be overseen
by a risk management inspector and they shall include the
requirements for all storage tanks to comply with the requirements
of the Technical Standards and Safety Act and its regulations, for all
owners/operators to have an emergency response plan with
emergency contact information of the municipality responsible for
water services and the Spills Action Centre. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-41-C-a |
Where the future handling and storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Region of Halton, Town of Milton, and the City of Hamilton shall prohibit gas stations through Planning Act tools. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-42-S-a |
For consistency of planning documents across the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region where the future handling and storage of fuel would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Niagara Escarpment Commission is requested to prohibit gas stations in the Niagara Escarpment Plan Area. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-43-C-a |
Where the existing and future handling and storage of fuel is or would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the City of Hamilton, Regional Municipality of Halton shall continue their established, related education and outreach programs. In addition, within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton, in collaboration with the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities, shall develop and implement an education and outreach program for homeowners with home fuel oil tanks newly identified as significant threats, regarding spill response and the method and timing for contacting the Spills Action Centre. As part of this program, stickers with emergency phone numbers shall be provided to be placed on or near the fuel tanks and fill pipes to ensure immediacy of response if there is a spill or leak detected.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-44-C-a |
Where the existing or potential future handling and storage of dense non-aqueous phase liquids is or would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the risk management official shall screen all building permit and Planning Act applications in accordance with policy G-2 within these vulnerable areas.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-44-C-b |
Where the existing or potential future handling and storage of dense
non-aqueous phase liquids is or would be significant drinking water
threats,
b. the risk management official shall establish risk management plans
with the persons undertaking or proposing to undertake the handling
and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid. The
implementation of these risk management plans shall be overseen
by a risk management inspector. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-45-C-a |
Where the existing and future handling and storage of an organic solvent would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the risk management official shall screen all building permit and Planning Act applications in accordance with policy G-2 within these vulnerable areas.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-45-C-b |
Where the existing and future handling and storage of an organic
solvent would be a significant drinking water threat,
b. the risk management official shall establish risk management plans
with the persons undertaking or proposing to undertake the handling
and storage of an organic solvent. The implementation of these risk
management plans shall be overseen by a risk management
inspector. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-46-S-a |
In support of the existing planning process for airport facilities and to protect drinking water sources from runoff containing de-icing chemicals, the following policies apply where the management of runoff that contains chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft would be a significant threat:
a. relevant airport authorities and operators, in their consideration of future airport facilities, are requested to include appropriate design standards and management practices to prevent the runoff from airport de-icing facilities from becoming a significant drinking water threat. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-47-C-a |
To reduce the risks to drinking water sources where there are existing or potential future significant drinking water threats from the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act, or from the use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing on all farms,
a. the risk management official shall screen all building permit and Planning Act applications in accordance with policy G-2 for properties zoned for agricultural use within these vulnerable areas.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-47-C-b |
To reduce the risks to drinking water sources where there are existing or potential future significant drinking water threats from the use of land as an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard on farms not phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act, or from the use of land for livestock grazing or pasturing on all farms,
b. where a significant threat is identified, the risk management official shall:
i. establish risk management plans with the persons using or proposing to use farm lands for livestock outdoors within a wellhead protection area-A of any nutrient units and in a wellhead protection area-B and E where there are 5 nutrients units or greater per farm property. The implementation of these risk management plans shall be overseen by a risk management inspector and their content shall be based upon the regulatory requirements of a nutrient management strategy under the Nutrient Management Act and incorporate the best management practices for livestock grazing and pasturing land as set out in Streamside Grazing (2007 and as amended) including extensive grazing within a wellhead protection area-A, and scoped to address these specific threats.
ii. undertake an education and outreach program on nutrient management methods and their potential impacts on drinking water sources, in a wellhead protection area-B and E where there are less than 5 nutrients units per farm property.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-48-C-a |
Where the existing and potential future use of land as an outdoor confinement area or farm-animal yard is or would be a significant drinking water threat and is managed by nutrient management strategies prepared under the Nutrient Management Act,
a. the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs shall ensure that all existing and future nutrient management strategies incorporate measures to protect drinking water sources that, when implemented, will ensure that the activities never become or cease to be significant drinking water threats. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-49-S-a |
To raise awareness of mapped drinking water sources and seek collaboration on the use of best practices for the application of road salt where this activity would be a future significant, moderate or low threat on private properties,
a. de-icing contractors are requested to develop and/or amend their salt management plans for private properties to identify the location of wellhead protection areas and intake protection zones, and to use best management practices to protect drinking water sources within these areas. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-5-C-a |
Where the future discharge of industrial effluent to the environment would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the environmental compliance approvals that govern industrial effluent discharges include appropriate terms and conditions, to ensure that these discharges do not become significant drinking water threats. As part of its program to review environmental compliance approvals that are affected by source protection plans the following conditions shall be considered for inclusion - strict criteria for effluent quality and monitoring.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-51-C-a |
Where the future discharge of combined sewer effluent from a stormwater outlet to surface water would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the City of Hamilton shall comply with the requirements of the province. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-52-C |
Where discharges from sewage treatment plants are existing significant drinking water threats to Lake Ontario municipal intakes,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the environmental compliance approvals that govern the sewage works include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the systems do not become significant drinking water threats. As part of its program to review environmental compliance approvals that are affected by source protection plans and in consultation with the municipalities responsible for water services, the following conditions shall be considered for inclusion - adjustment of the reporting thresholds for pathogens and chemicals of concern in effluent.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-52-C-b |
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
|
2 |
False |
|
T-52-C-c |
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
|
2 |
False |
|
T-53-C-a |
To facilitate the effective implementation of policies for significant drinking water threats and assist in municipal decision-making,
a. the municipal planning authorities are requested to require proponents to disclose whether any of the following activities are expected to occur on the property where they would be significant drinking water threats, proposed storage location, where applicable, as well as the substances utilized or stored and their volume:
i. the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats, or disposes of sewage
ii. the application or storage of agricultural source material
iii. the application, or handling and storage of commercial fertilizer
iv. the application, or handling and storage of pesticide
v. the application, or handling and storage of road salt
vi. the storage of snow
vii. the handling and storage of fuel
viii. the handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid
ix. the handling and storage of an organic solvent
x. the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard
xi. the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-53-C-b |
To facilitate the effective implementation of policies for significant drinking water threats and assist in municipal decision-making,
b. the City of Hamilton, the Region of Halton, and the County of Wellington are requested to require a full disclosure report as part of a complete application under the Planning Act.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-53-S-c |
REMOVE |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
|
2 |
False |
|
T-54-C-a |
Where the future application, or handling and storage of category 1 non-agricultural source material would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the City of Hamilton, Regional Municipality of Halton shall continue their established, related education and outreach programs. In addition, within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton, in collaboration with the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities, are requested to develop and implement education and outreach programs to promote best management practices regarding newly identified significant threat activities for the protection of source water.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-55-C-a |
Within a wellhead protection area Q1, where an increased or new water
taking would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure
that groundwater Permit to Take Water approvals include
appropriate terms and conditions to demonstrate that the taking will
not adversely impact the aquifer’s ability to meet municipal and
other water supply requirements. The following conditions should be
considered for inclusion – a phased approach to assess impacts
before fully approved and the requirement for appropriate
monitoring. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-55-C-b |
Within a wellhead protection area Q1, where an increased or new water
taking would be a significant drinking water threat,
b. the municipal planning authority shall only provide final approval for
new development that requires a Permit to Take Water once the
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks has determined that
the proposed taking does not become a significant water quantity
threat. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-56-C-a |
To ensure consumptive demand does not become a significant drinking water threat,
a. the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton shall work to reduce consumption by strengthening watermain leak detection programs in areas serviced by a well
located within a wellhead protection area Q1 within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan takes effect, and shall initiate a watermain leak
reduction strategy as deemed required by the municipality, within the following year. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-57-C-a |
To encourage community involvement in safeguarding drinking water sources where consumptive demand could result in a significant drinking water threat in a wellhead protection area Q1,
a. within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton shall develop or enhance Water Conservation Plans to support sustainable drinking water sources.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-57-C-b |
To encourage community involvement in safeguarding drinking water
sources where consumptive demand could result in a significant
drinking water threat in a wellhead protection area Q1,
b. within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan takes
effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton shall review and
where necessary enhance and enforce outdoor water use programs. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-58-C-a |
Within a wellhead protection area Q2 where a future reduction in
recharge would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the municipal planning authority shall only approve settlement area
and urban area expansions as part of a municipal comprehensive
review where it has been demonstrated that a reduction in recharge
will not create a significant drinking water threat. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-59-C-a |
Within a wellhead protection area Q2 where a future reduction in recharge would be a significant drinking water threat:
a. the municipal planning authority shall require that planning applications demonstrate that all attempts have been made to achieve a pre-development recharge condition using best management practices and including low impact development measures. |
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-6 |
Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-6-C-a |
Where the future installation of sanitary sewers and related pipes would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the environmental compliance approvals that govern these systems include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the sewers and pipes do not become significant drinking water threats. As part of its program to review environmental compliance approvals that are affected by source protection plans the following conditions shall be considered for inclusion - requirement for regular maintenance and inspection.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-60-S-a |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of road salt would be a moderate or low drinking water threat in a wellhead protection area, intake protection zone or issue contributing area,
a. the City of Hamilton, Regional Municipality of Halton shall continue their established, related education and outreach programs. In addition, within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the City of Hamilton and the Region of Halton, in collaboration with the City of Burlington and Towns of Milton, Halton Hills and Oakville in Halton Region, are requested to develop and implement education and outreach programs for the private and public sector, as well as the general public, about the impacts of road salt on drinking water sources and the use of best management practices. It is recommended that the key messages be the efficient use of road salts and the use of alternatives.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-61-S-a |
Where the existing and future application, or handling and storage of road salt would be moderate or low drinking water threats,
a. within two years of the date that the Source Protection Plan comes into effect, the municipalities shall amend their salt management plans to identify the location of wellhead protection areas, issue contributing areas, and intake protection zones and to enhance best management practices in these areas.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-62-S |
Where the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline is an existing significant drinking water threat, the Canada Energy Regulator and Technical Standards and Safety Authority are recommended to ensure that their regulatory requirements manage liquid hydrocarbon pipelines through appropriate design standards (including the location of safety valves), monitoring, maintenance (including integrity management programs) and other relevant practices, such that drinking water sources are protected.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-63-S |
Where the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline could become a significant drinking water threat, the Canada Energy Regulator and Ontario Energy Board in their consideration of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline application are recommended to ensure that the applicant has complied with and included appropriate design standards (including the location of safety valves), monitoring, maintenance (including integrity management programs) and other relevant practices, that when implemented will prevent a pipeline from becoming a significant drinking water threat.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-64-S |
Where the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline is or could be a significant, moderate or low threat to drinking water sources, liquid hydrocarbon pipeline owners are requested to use threats risk assessment information from assessment reports approved under the Ontario Clean Water Act, 2006 and relevant watershed information while developing and updating emergency planning zones (EPZs) and designated geographical areas (DGAs).
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-65-S |
Where the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline is or could be a significant threat to drinking water sources, and where the handling and storage of fuel is an existing significant drinking water threats to Lake Ontario municipal intakes, facility owners are requested to update emergency preparedness/contingency plans to include the location of municipal intakes, actions to be taken to protect drinking water sources should an incident occur, and the requirement for inclusion of the protection of drinking water sources in emergency preparedness exercises.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-66-C |
Where discharges from municipal sewage treatment plants are identified as existing significant drinking water threats to Lake Ontario municipal intakes,
municipalities that own the sewage treatment plants are requested to update emergency preparedness/ contingency plans to include the location of municipal intakes, actions to be taken to protect drinking water sources should an incident occur, and the requirement for inclusion of the protection of drinking water sources in emergency preparedness exercises.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-67-S |
Where the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline is an existing significant threat to drinking water sources, and where the discharges from sewage treatment plants and the handling and storage of fuel, are an existing significant threat to Lake Ontario drinking water sources,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall provide mapping of intake protection zones three and the locations of known significant threats to the Spills Action Centre, and if necessary modify procedures to ensure that the operators of all water treatment plants that could be affected by a spill are notified.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-68-C |
Where the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline is or could be a significant threat to Lake Ontario and groundwater municipal drinking water sources and where the discharges from sewage treatment plants and the handling and storage of fuel are existing significant drinking water threats to Lake Ontario municipal intakes, the Halton Region and Hamilton Region Conservation Authorities shall on an annual basis:
a. provide educational awareness sessions on drinking water source protection to interested liquid hydrocarbon pipeline companies;
b. provide relevant website addresses for approved assessment reports and the source protection plan and watershed information if available, to liquid hydrocarbon pipeline companies;
c. request the Canada Energy Regulator and Technical Standards and Safety Authority to confirm that their requirements for liquid hydrocarbon pipelines manage existing significant drinking water threats;
d. request the Canada Energy Regulator and Ontario Energy Board to confirm that their requirements for pipeline design standards, monitoring, maintenance and other relevant practices in vulnerable areas prevents a pipeline from becoming a significant drinking water threat;
e. request information updates including new or changes to liquid hydrocarbon pipelines;
f. request an invitation from liquid hydrocarbon pipeline owners, sewage treatment plant owners, and fuel storage facility owners to observe emergency preparedness exercises relevant to the Halton-Hamilton Source Protection Region; and request a copy of their emergency preparedness plans when amended to protect municipal drinking water sources.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-7 |
Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-7-C-a |
Where existing and potential future septic systems and holding tanks regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act or the Environmental Protection Act are or would be significant drinking water threats,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that environmental compliance approvals that govern these systems include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that these systems and tanks cease to be or do not become significant drinking water threats. As part of its program to review environmental compliance approvals that are affected by source protection plans the following conditions shall be considered for inclusion - mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that the quality of sources of drinking water is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system and tank inspections at least every five years, upgrading of these septic systems and holding tanks to current standards, if necessary, and annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority of any monitoring and inspection programs required and their results.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-8 |
Official plans shall be amended for conformity with the Source Protection Plan at the time of the next review in accordance with s.26 of the Planning Act. Zoning by-laws shall be amended within 3 years after the approval of the official plan. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-8-C-a |
Where existing or future sewage treatment plants are or would be significant drinking water threats from discharges, bypasses, or the storage of sewage,
a. the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks shall ensure that the approvals that govern sewage treatment plants include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that they cease to be or do not become significant drinking water threats. As part of its program to review environmental compliance approvals that are affected by source protection plans the following conditions shall be considered for inclusion - strict criteria for effluent quality, appropriate sizing to reduce bypasses, in addition to inspections and proactive maintenance of the works to prevent leaks.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
T-9 |
Decisions on planning matters shall conform with the policy immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T-9-C-a |
In consideration of Planning Act applications where the future discharge of stormwater effluent from stormwater management facilities would be a significant drinking water threat,
a. where possible, the municipal planning authority shall require the applicant to locate stormwater management facilities outside of the vulnerable area.
|
Halton Region, Hamilton Region |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
T1EF-SA |
To address the local threat: transportation of hazardous substances (liquid fuels, sulphuric acid and septage), the Ministry of the Environment Spills Action Centre should review and update contact and procedure information based on the Intake Protection Zone and Wellhead Protection Area delineations to help ensure that drinking water sources will be protected in the event of a spill. This updated information will help ensure that the drinking water vulnerable areas are prioritized for clean-up and that water treatment plant operators are contacted as quickly as possible in the case of a spill.
This policy applies to the vulnerable areas for existing and future significant, moderate and low transportation of hazardous substances threats. This action should occur within one year of the source protection plan taking effect.
Monitoring policy M7 applies. |
Nickel District |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T2EF-SA |
In accordance with Section 22 (7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards to identify the locations of Wellhead Protection Areas and Intake Protection Zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within the Wellhead Protection Areas with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or within an Intake Protection Zone or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher.
Municipalities (the City of Greater Sudbury and the Municipality of Markstay-Warren) shall be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs designed by the Province in collaboration with the SPAs. These signs shall be placed, at a minimum, where municipal arterial roads are located within a Wellhead Protection Area with a vulnerability score of 10, and/or an Intake Protection Zone or Wellhead Protection Area E with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher. Existing signs will be replaced by new MTO-designed signs as required.
The above policies will be implemented and delivered with an education and outreach plan within each Source Protection Area. These policies, in conjunction with additional education and outreach policies, should be implemented within 2 years after the effective date of the plan.
Monitoring policies M8 and M18 apply. |
Nickel District |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T3EF-SA |
The City of Greater Sudbury and the Municipality of Markstay-Warren shall update their Emergency Management Plan to include the following:
- Maps to show the location of the vulnerable areas identified in the Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area Assessment Report; and
- Response plans to spills from highway accidents and railway derailments in the vulnerable areas, including up-to-date information regarding the location of spill response equipment.
This policy applies to the vulnerable areas for existing and future significant, moderate and low transportation of hazardous substances threats.
This policy shall be implemented within one year of the source protection plan taking effect. The Emergency Management Plan will be updated within one year of any changes made to the delineation of the applicable vulnerable areas.
Monitoring policy M15 applies. |
Nickel District |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
T4EF-PI |
The Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that Certificates of Approval / Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern businesses that haul septage include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the threat ceases to be a significant drinking water threat.
It is recommended that the Ministry of the Environment should require businesses that haul septage to prepare or update their spill contingency plans as part of their Certificates of Approval / Environmental Compliance Approvals to include the locations of vulnerable areas. These spill contingency plans may require the businesses to immediately contact the MOE Spills Action Centre and the municipality, as required in Part X of the Environmental Protection Act, in the case of a spill or accident.
This policy applies to the vulnerable areas for existing and future significant, moderate and low transportation of hazardous substances threats.
Monitoring policy M1 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
TB.1.NLB-SP |
The City of Thunder Bay should update a Spill Prevention and Contingency Plan which may include, at minimum placing a buoy at the anchorage boundary that is within proximity to the Intake, as per Figure 5: Source Protection Plan Map #5: Thunder Bay (Bare Point) Intake Protection Zones. |
Lakehead |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
THS1 |
The following existing and future circumstances are designated for the implementation of a local significant threat activity policy:
1. The transportation of 2500 L or greater of sulphuric acid.
2. The transportation of 2500 L or greater of sodium hydroxide.
3. The transportation of any quantity of septage.
Within one year of the date the Source Protection Plan (SP Plan) takes effect, the Municipality shall recognize a spill as an emergency situation in the
emergency response plan for the Municipality that could occur as a result of the circumstances listed above. Further, the vulnerable areas to which this policy
applies shall be included as schedule(s) to the emergency response plan. When the emergency response team of the Municipality identifies that a spill has
occurred in the vulnerable area, the Source Protection Authority via the Conservation Authority shall be notified in the same way that other emergency
response partners are contacted.
Within one year of the date the SP Plan takes effect, the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Spills Action Centre should review and update contact information, Procedure Cards and other information based on the areas to which this policy applies to ensure that drinking water sources will be protected in the event of a spill as a result of the circumstances listed above.
This policy shall apply in the following vulnerable areas:
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the
exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
THS2 |
The following existing circumstances occur in the North Bay Intake Protection Zone 1 (IPZ-1):
A. Moderate
1. The transportation of 2,500 L or greater of ammonium nitrate.
2. The transportation of 2,500 L or greater of sodium hydroxide.
3. The transportation of 2,500 L or greater of sulphuric acid.
4. The transportation of 2,500 L or greater of copper.
5. The transportation of 2,500 L or greater of liquid fuel.
6. The transportation of septage in any quantity.
B. Low
1. The transportation of 2,500 L or greater of formaldehyde.
2. The transportation of 2,500 L or greater of methanol.
3. The transportation of greater than 250 L but less than 2,500 L of liquid fuel.
Within one year of the date the Source Protection Plan (SP Plan) takes effect, the
City of North Bay should recognize a spill as an emergency situation in an emergency
response plan for the City, which could occur as a result of the circumstances
named above. Further, the North Bay IPZ-1 should be included as a schedule
to the emergency response plan. When the City emergency response team
identifies that a spill has occurred in the vulnerable area, the Source
Protection Authority via the Conservation Authority should be notified in the
same way that other emergency response partners are contacted.
Within one year of the date the SP Plan takes effect, the Ministry of Environment and
Climate Change Spills Action Centre should review and update contact
information and Procedure Cards based on the North Bay IPZ-1 to ensure that
drinking water sources will be protected in the event of a spill as a result of
a circumstance named above. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Low, Moderate |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TIME-1 |
For existing activities designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, a risk management plan must be established no later than 5 years from the date the source protection plan takes effect. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
TIME-2 |
On the date the source protection plan takes effect, all future activities designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act require a risk management plan to be established prior to engaging in the designated activity in the area where the threat could be significant. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
TIME-3 |
For the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, Section 57 does not apply to a person engaged in the designated activity in the area where the threat could be significant until 365 days after the day the source protection plan takes effect. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
TIME-4 |
On the date the source protection plan takes effect, or when Source Protection Plan amendments take effect, all future activities designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act are prohibited in the area where the threat could be significant. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
TIME-5 |
All existing prescribed instruments shall be amended to conform with the applicable significant threat policy within 5 years after the source protection plan takes effect, or on a schedule determined by the Director
based on a prioritized review of the instruments that govern significant drinking water threat activities. For existing activities added through amendments to the Assessment Report, prescribed instruments shall be
amended within 5 years of the date the amended source protection plan takes effect, or on a schedule determined by the Director based on a prioritized review of the instruments that govern significant
drinking water threat activities. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
TIME-6 |
All future prescribed instruments shall comply with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies on the day the source protection plan takes effect. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future, Future |
1 |
False |
|
TIME-7 |
Official Plans and Zoning By-Laws shall be updated to conform with the applicable significant drinking water threat policies in accordance with Section 26 of the Planning Act. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
TIME-8 |
The education and outreach program is to be developed and initiated within 3 years from the date the source protection plan takes effect. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
TP-01 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, municipalities shall give due consideration to enacting a municipal by-law regarding geothermal energy systems in a WHPA-A or WHPA-B vulnerable area (future activity).
The municipal by-law would:
1. prohibit the installation of vertical geothermal energy systems in WHPA-A; and
2. prohibit the installation of open loop geothermal systems (where water is pumped out and not re-circulated) in WHPA-A and WHPA-B; and
3. require that any drilling below the water table necessary for the installation of vertical geothermal systems in WHPA-B only be performed by a licensed well driller.
The process to enact the by-law should be initiated within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan and the by-law enacted within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-11, MP-12 and MP-19 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-02 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, municipalities shall give due consideration to enacting a water connection by-law in a WHPA-A or WHPA-B vulnerable area (existing activity or future activity).
The by-law shall:
apply to all properties in a wellhead protection area zone A or B where:
the vulnerability score is 6, 8 or 10; and
a municipal water line is located on a right-of-way that abuts a property; and
the linear distance between the water line and the point from which plumbing enters or is situated within a structure on the property is less than 100 metres; and
sufficient capacity exists in the municipal water system to supply the property
require connection to the municipal water line;
require decommissioning of any water wells on the property at the time of connection to the municipal water line;
establish a deadline for the connection to be completed that is within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
At the discretion of the municipality, the by-law may also contain an exemption for properties where the estimated cost of the water connection exceeds three times the estimated cost of any upgrades or maintenance required on the existing water supply well to bring it into compliance with current regulations.
The process to enact the by-law should be initiated within three years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan and the by-law enacted within five years of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
Monitoring policies MP-11 and MP-19 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-03 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, municipalities have the following obligation under O. Reg 287/07 s. 27(3):
If a person applies to a municipality for approval of a proposal to engage in an activity in a wellhead protection area or a surface water intake protection zone that may result in the creation of a new transport pathway or the modification of an existing transport pathway, the municipality shall give the source protection authority and the source protection committee notice of the proposal and shall include a description of the proposal, the identity of the person responsible for the proposal and a description of the approvals the person requires to engage in the proposed activity.
Municipalities shall ensure that information on any proposals involving transport pathways are provided to the parties noted in the regulation (future activity).
Monitoring policy MP-20 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-04 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, municipalities shall give due consideration to including in their official plan a provision regarding the servicing of new lots in a WHPA-A or WHPA-B vulnerable area (future activity).
The provision would:
apply to WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is 10; and apply to new lots created either through severance or subdivision; and
stipulate that new lots are only permitted where the property will be connected to a municipal water system
Monitoring policies MP-13 and MP-22 apply. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-05 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall give due consideration to implementing legislation regarding geothermal energy systems (future activity).
The legislation would include provisions that:
require that any drilling necessary for the installation of vertical geothermal systems only be performed by a licensed well driller; and
prohibit the installation of open loop geothermal systems (where water is pumped out and not re-circulated); and
prohibit the installation of vertical geothermal energy systems in WHPA-A.
Monitoring policy MP-04 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-06 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall give due consideration to implementing legislation regarding a permit system for wells (future activity).
The legislation would include provisions that would:
require a permit to be obtained prior to the construction of a well;
require an application for a permit to include information about:
any wells currently on the property;
distances to other features on the property or nearby, such as municipal wells, wellhead protection areas, lot lines, structures, wells, geothermal systems, and sewage systems;
anticipated drilling depth and methods to be employed;
materials to be used in construction;
finished height and grading;
set guidelines for setbacks;
establish a database for well permits that is connected to roll numbers and well records;
establish an inspection regime and penalties for non-compliance; and
consider the cumulative effect of wells.
Monitoring policy MP-04 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-07 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing shall give due consideration to making changes to the Ontario Building Code and other such legislation related to wells (future activity).
The legislative changes would include provisions that would:
deem wells to be a structure under the Ontario Building Code; and
deem appropriate sections of O. Reg. 903 to be applicable law under the Ontario Building Code.
Monitoring policy MP-09 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-08 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall give due consideration to making changes to O. Reg. 903 under the Ontario Water Resources Act (future activity).
The legislative changes would include provisions that would:
prohibit the drilling of wells within WHPA-A unless:
the well to be drilled would be a production well associated with a large residential municipal drinking water system; or
the well to be drilled would be a monitoring well.
Monitoring policy MP-04 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-09 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, in conjunction with municipalities and Conservation Authorities, shall give due consideration to creating a pilot project to determine the location of unused and abandoned wells within vulnerable areas. An additional goal of the project would be to decommission the wells once they are located (existing activity).
The project could include:
airborne geophysics;
magnetic surveys;
interviews;
air photo interpretation and comparison over time;
historical land use search.
Monitoring policy MP-05 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-1 |
The Severn Sound Source Protection Authority, in collaboration with the Township of Tiny, shall undertake an education and outreach program to inform the owners and operators of transport pathways within the Georgian Sands Issue Contributing Area for Nitrate about the following:
1) The potential for the transport pathway to endanger the municipal water supply
2) Best management practices for upgrading transport pathways to minimize the potential for impacts to the water supply; and
3) For wells subject to O.Reg 903 of the Ontario Water Resources Act, their legal obligations with respect to well construction, maintenance, and abandonment. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Non-specific |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
TP-10 |
The policy applies to the establishment, operation or maintenance of a well in all WHPA-A and WHPA-B vulnerable areas (existing activity).
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and/or the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs should make incentive programs available to property owners in the affected vulnerable areas. Investment should continue in existing incentive programs (e.g. Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program) that contribute to the protection of drinking water threats over the long term. Consideration could also be given to new incentive programs to assist with the implementation costs of risk mitigation practices (existing activity).
Incentive programs should require an application that is subject to a technical review and approval process.
Eligible projects in the grant program should include, but not necessarily be limited to:
well decommissioning;
upgrades to meet standards;
well maintenance;
connection to municipal water service when accompanied by decommissioning of a well;
consulting fees;
-other best management practices
Monitoring policy MP-06 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-11 |
To ensure that any drinking water threat in the vicinity of a transport pathway ceases to be or will not become a significant drinking water threat; or that a transport pathway ceases to endanger the raw water supply of a drinking water system, Conservation Authorities should provide an education program that offers information and materials to landowners whose properties may have transport pathways (existing activity or future activity).
Topics to be discussed in the program may include, but are not limited to:
connection between transport pathways and risks to groundwater aquifers;
obligation to maintain wells and decommission abandoned wells under O. Reg 903;
municipal by-laws governing geothermal systems, if enacted;
Canadian Standards Guidelines for the Design and Installation of Earth Energy Systems;
available resources, such as Water Wells Best Management Practices Book from OMAFRA and Water Supply Wells Requirements and Best Management Practices book from MOE
-other initiatives, such as WellAware and Well Wise, that encourage public participation;
assistance and advice available from agencies, such as Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and Ontario Ground Water Association;
funding opportunities;
the use of a qualified professional to consider the effect of municipal infrastructure and other developments with regard to the establishment of transport pathways;
partnerships between licensing authorities (i.e. Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change for drinking water and Ministry of Natural Resources for oil and gas wells, and pits and quarries) and landowners;
requirement for municipalities to forward proposals to Source Protection Authority where a proposed activity would create a transport pathway;
limitations on siting of wells and geothermal systems that may come into force if new by-laws or statutes are passed; and
best management practices for wells, geothermal systems and other transport pathways.
Monitoring policy MP-28 applies. |
Grey Sauble, Northern Bruce Peninsula, Saugeen Valley |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TP-2 |
The Ministry of the Environment should be encouraged to make incentive programs available to property owners within the Georgian Sands Issue Contributing Area for Nitrate that have Transport Pathways to:
1) Decommission sub-standard wells
2) Upgrade and complete required on-going maintenance of wells
3) Incorporate best management practices to ensure the transport pathway does not pose a risk to the municipal water supply. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
TP1 |
In this source protection plan, some drinking water threat activities are addressed by prohibiting ""future ; threats and managing ""existing ; threats. This includes:
Part IV - a ""future ; occurrence of a threat activity designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act and therefore prohibited while its ""existing ; occurrence is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act and requires a risk management plan.
Prescribed Instruments - a ""future ; occurrence of a drinking water threat is prohibited while ""existing ; occurrences are managed.
Land use planning - ""future ; drinking water threats are prohibited through decisions on planning matters, while other policy approaches, such as a specify action or an education and outreach policy, are used to manage the same ""existing ; drinking water threats.
Policy Text
Where a policy in this plan refers to an ""existing ; threat, it is generally understood to mean an activity that commenced or has been engaged in at some time within the last 10 years or up until the day before the source protection plan comes into effect. A ""future ; threat activity is generally understood to mean an activity that commences on a day on or after the day the source protection plan comes into effect.
However, despite these definitions, in order to be fair to bona fide applications in process and to recognize approvals obtained, it is important to allow certain ""future ; prohibited activities to be treated as ""existing ; activities and therefore subject to the policies that apply to ""existing ; activities.
Where a policy in this Plan prohibits a ""future ; threat activity, the policy for managing ""existing ; drinking water threat activities applies in the following cases even though those activities will commence after the source protection plan comes into effect:
A drinking water threat activity that is related to a development proposal where an application was made or an approval was obtained under the Planning Act or Condominium Act on a day before the source protection plan comes into effect. The policy for ""existing ; drinking water threats also applies to any further applications required under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, or prescribed instruments, to implement the development proposal.
A drinking water threat activity that is related to an application made under the Building Code Act on a day before the source protection plan comes into effect.
A drinking water threat activity that is related to an application made for the issuance or amendment of a prescribed instrument on a day before the source protection plan comes into effect. |
Nickel District |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
TRANS-1 |
Where a policy in this plan prohibits a ""future"" threat activity, the policy for managing ""existing"" drinking water threats activities applies in the following cases even though those activities will commence after the Source Protection Plan comes into effect: 1) A drinking water threat activity that is related to a development proposal where a complete application was made under the Planning Act or Condominium Act prior to the day the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. The policy for ""existing"" drinking water threats also applies to any further applications required under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, or prescribed instruments to implement the development proposal. 2) A drinking water threat activity that is related to an application for a Building Permit, which has been submitted in compliance with Division C 1.3.1.3 (5) of the Ontario Building Code Act or a development permit under the Niagara Escarpment Development Control Area prior to the day the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. 3) A drinking water threat activity that is related to an application made for the issuance or amendment of a prescribed instrument prior to the day the source protection plan comes into effect. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W-1 |
Applicable Activities: The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act is an existing significant drinking water threat and the activity requires a Prescribed Instrument.
W-1: Review all existing Prescribed Instruments related to these activities to determine if they are adequate to ensure that the associated activities are not significant drinking water threats. If they are deemed to be inadequate for this purpose, they will be amended to include additional conditions that will ensure that the activities cease to be significant drinking water threats. All amendments to Prescribed Instruments required by this policy must be carried out within three years from the date that the plan takes effect or such other date as the applicable Director determines based on a prioritized review of Prescribed Instruments that govern the activity.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
W-2 |
Applicable Activities: The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act would be a future significant drinking water threat and the activity would require a Prescribed Instrument except for a Prescribed Instrument issued for a mobile PCB waste destruction unit where that unit will be used for the sole purpose of the on-site destruction of PCB waste originated on that site.
W-2(1): Future occurrences of the activity are not permitted.
W-2(2): Future occurrences of the activity are prohibited.
|
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
W-3 |
Applicable Activities: The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act is an existing a significant drinking water threat and the activity does not require a Prescribed Instrument.
W-3: The activity is designated for the purpose of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The Risk Management Plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
W-4 |
Applicable Activities: The establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act would be a future significant drinking water threat and the activity would not require a Prescribed Instrument.
W-4(1): The activity is prohibited and designated for the purpose of section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006.
W-4(2): W-4(1) does not apply if the activity is the storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste in section 1 of O. Reg 347. Future instances of that activity are designated for the purposes of section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006. The risk management plan will be prepared in accordance with the general provisions given in policy G-8. |
Crowe Valley, Ganaraska Region, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
W1-storage-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
In reviewing applications for Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) under the legislation governing this activity, for in the Windsor IPZ-1, the Ministry of Environment shall allow the establishment of systems that store combined storm water and sewage, where such systems are specifically for the purpose of reducing combined sewer overflow.
The Environmental Compliance Approval (Certificate of Approval) shall require that, through terms and conditions specified in the Environmental Compliance Approval (Certificate of Approval), the future storage of stormwater and sewage is managed in order to protect sources of drinking water.
The above applies to the future significant threat of the storage of sewage, in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance for future threats is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1A1L1-deicair (Specify Action) |
The Essex Region Conservation Authority will request Airport Authority, in their consideration of any new airport facilities, to include appropriate design standards and management practices to manage the significant drinking water threat activity of run-off generated from airport de-icing facilities. This request will be made when the Source Protection Plan takes effect (this is the date of compliance).
The above applies to the future significant threat of the management of chemicals used in the de-icing of aircraft, in the vulnerable areas:
Windsor IPZ-1
Amherstburg IPZ-1 |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1A1L1-storagepesticide-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 'Risk Management Plans' of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-1, Amherstburg IPZ-1 and Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1: The existing and future storage of pesticides such that the quantity stored is > 2500 kg (for retail sale or for use in extermination).
The Risk Management Plan (RMP) shall require that the Pesticides Act requirements for storage of pesticides be fulfilled, and include measures necessary to protect water, such as spills/runoff management and setbacks from water courses or drainage systems. The RMP will also require that the Pesticide Label be followed.
The Risk Management Official will obtain documentation from the property owner to indicate that the requirements of the RMP are followed. A form may be prescribed for this purpose. The Risk Management Official will have discretion as to what constitutes a satisfactory Risk Management Plan.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the storage of pesticide in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
For future threats, the date of compliance is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Risk Management Official shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the Plan the Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1E-RMP |
Where the Environmental Protection Act does not require an approval, the establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site (existing) is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act requiring a risk management plan in the vulnerable areas where it is a significant threat. Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
All land uses except residential in the City of Greater Sudbury Zoning By-Law 2010-100Z are designated for the purpose of Section 59 of the Clean Water Act in the vulnerable areas where the establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act could be a significant threat.
Monitoring policy M2 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-applicationNASM-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
NOTE: There are no agricultural lands in Essex – this policy intended to cover off-farm application and/or storage of NASM as processed organic waste (i.e. biosolids).
No applications of non-agricultural source material (NASM) shall be permitted in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1.
This policy applies to Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) administered by the Ministry of Environment for this activity.
The above applies to the existing (none known to exist) and future significant threat of the application of Non Agricultural Source Material (NASM), in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-applNASM-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 ('Prohibited Activities') of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and Amherstburg IPZ-1: the existing (none known to exist) and future application of non agricultural source material (NASM).
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-bypass/effluent/storage-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
No wastewater treatment facilities that discharge to surface water by means of designed bypass or other than designed bypass in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1 shall be permitted.
No sewage treatment tanks in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1 shall be permitted, with the exception of storage, in the Windsor IPZ-1, of future storm water and sewage from combined sewers, for the purpose of reducing combined sewer overflows (CSOs).
The above applies to existing (none known to exist) and future significant threats of sewage treatment plant bypass to discharge to surface water, sewage treatment plant effluent discharges and the storage of sewage, in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
This policy applies to Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) administered by the Ministry of Environment for these activities.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-hazardouswaste-1 (Clean Water Act) |
For any existing or future waste disposal site, or aspect thereof, within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, that is not subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, it shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 and a Risk Management Plan shall be required to ensure the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The Risk Management Plan may require that the wastes produced on the property be properly managed and stored in accordance to applicable legislation, standards, industry guidelines and industry best practices, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements that are deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the circumstances under which a RMP is not required for site specific land uses, types of waste and/or volume thresholds provided that the RMO is satisfied that the activity will not result in a significant drinking water threat. Such direction shall be made in consultation with the Ministry of the Environment and/or building officials.
For future threats, the date of compliance is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Risk Management Official shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-minetail-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
No storage, treatment or discharge of mine tailings shall be permitted to be established in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1.
This policy applies to Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) administered by the Ministry of Environment for this activity.
The above applies to the existing (none known to exist) and future significant threat of the storage, treatment and discharge of tailings from mines, in the vulnerable areas
mentioned above.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-storageNASM-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 ('Prohibited Activities') of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and Amherstburg IPZ-1: the existing (none known to exist) and future storage of non agricultural source material (NASM).
The above applies to the existing (none known to exist) and future significant threat of the storage of Non Agricultural Source Material (NASM), in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-storageNASM-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
NOTE: There are no agricultural lands in Essex – this policy intended to cover off-farm application and/or storage of NASM as processed organic waste (i.e. biosolids).
No storages of non-agricultural source material (NASM) shall be permitted in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1.
This policy applies to Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) administered by the Ministry of Environment for this activity.
The above applies to the existing (none known to exist) and future significant threat of the storage of Non Agricultural Source Material (NASM), in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-storageroadsalt-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 ('Prohibited Activities') of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1: the existing (none known to exist) and future storage of road salt in quantities greater than 5000 tonnes.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the storage of road salt in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-storagesnow-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 ('Prohibited Activities') of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1: the existing (none known to exist) and future storage of snow over areas of 1 ha or more.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the storage of snow in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1-waste-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
No existing (none known to exist) and future waste disposal sites shall be permitted to be established in the Windsor IPZ-1 and Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1, at which the land filling of petroleum refinery waste, hazardous, liquid industrial or processed liquid industrial waste or municipal waste, or the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste could take place.
No future waste disposal sites at which the land filling of petroleum refinery waste, hazardous, liquid industrial or processed liquid industrial waste or municipal waste, or the storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste could take place in the Amherstburg IPZ-1 shall be permitted.
This policy applies to Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) administered by the Ministry of Environment for this activity.
In the Amherstburg IPZ-1, the Ministry of Environment shall ensure that the existing and amended or updated Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) include terms and conditions that manage the significant threat activity in order to protect sources of drinking water. For the purpose of this policy, in the Amherstburg IPZ-1, existing threat activities shall include activities related to a complete application made under the Planning Act or Condominium Act or the Building Code or for an Environmental Compliance Approval, if the application is made before the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
This policy will be reflected in the Official Plans for the City of Windsor and Town of Amherstburg at the time of the next Official Plan five year review exercise as per Section 26(1) of the Planning Act, and in Zoning By-laws within 3 years following the Official Plan update.
Sites that do not require an environmental compliance approval are exempt from this policy and are subject to Policy No. 26 policy (W1L1A1-hazardouswaste-1 (Clean Water Act)), which requires a Risk Management Plan.
The date of compliance for prohibiting existing and future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For managing existing threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1L1A1storage-1 (Specify Action) |
The Municipality will prohibit sewage treatment tanks in the Windsor IPZ-1, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1, with the exception of storage of stormwater and sewage (from combined sewers) in the Windsor IPZ-1, through a means that the Municipality finds appropriate such as Municipal Act By-law.
The above applies to existing (none known to exist) and future significant threats of the storage of sewage in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2-combinedsewer-2 (Govern Research) |
The City of Windsor will initiate a research program when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. The research program will characterize combined sewer overflows in the Windsor intake protection zones (IPZs) 1s and 2s such that the program will provide input to a sewer and storm management plan. The research program will include the estimation of combined sewer overflow discharge volumes, frequencies of discharge and pollutant loading (conventional parameters including pH, biochemical oxygen demand-5 day, and suspended solids, and possibly other parameters as needed). The research program will be targeted for completion in 2014.
The above applies to the existing significant threat of Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) in the vulnerable areas:
Windsor IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2-combinedsewerbypasseffluent-1 (Specify Action) |
The City of Windsor will initiate the development of a sewer and storm management plan when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. The sewer and storm management plan will include plans for further sewer separation in the sewersheds of the combined sewer overflows and the Little River Pollution Control Plant. The management plan will also consider storm water retention structures such as deep tunnel storage to reduce combined sewer overflow. The development of the management plan will be targeted for completion in 2016. The City of Windsor will also continue its current sewer separation program.
The above applies to the existing significant threat of Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs), bypass and effluent discharges in the vulnerable areas: Windsor IPZ-1 and IPZ-2. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2-combinedsewerbypasseffluent-4 (Stewardship/Incentive) |
The City of Windsor and Town of Tecumseh in conjunction with the Essex Region Conservation Authority, will seek funding assistance from the Ministry of the Environment, in order to undertake a stewardship/incentive program for downspout disconnections and similar measures that will assist in addressing the threats associated with combined sewer overflows, bypass and effluent discharges in the Windsor IPZ-1 and Windsor IPZ-2.
The Town of Tecumseh, in conjunction with the Essex Region Conservation Authority, will seek funding assistance from the Ministry of the Environment, in order to undertake a stewardship/incentive program for downspout disconnections and similar measures that will assist in addressing the threats associated with sewage treatment plant bypass and effluent discharge in the Windsor IPZ-2.
The above applies to the existing significant threat of Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs), bypass and effluent discharges, in the vulnerable areas: Windsor IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
The funding assistance will be requested, as described above, when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2-combinedsewerstorm-3 (E&O) |
The City of Windsor will initiate and lead Education and Outreach when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. The Education and Outreach will educate property owners within the sewershed areas of the subject vulnerable areas where existing CSOs are significant threats, and where future stormwater management could be significant threats. The Education and Outreach will promote downspout disconnection, use of rain barrels, and will provide information on what not to dispose of down the drain and the spills action centre in case of spills, and other such initiatives that assist in educating the property owners about combined sewer overflow, as well as stormwater management. The delivery of the Education and Outreach will be targeted for completion in 2014, and will be continued as needed based on review at that time.
The above applies to the future significant threat of Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) and stormwater management in the vulnerable areas:
Windsor IPZ-1 and IPZ-2 |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2A1L1-allactivities-1 (Clean Water Act) |
All land uses identified within the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-Laws where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purpose of Sections 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act, are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses, with the exception of residential uses. Within these designated land uses and areas, a written notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with Section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the circumstances under which a Planning Act Approval Authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act, Condominium Act, or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the Planning Act Approval Authority or building official, as the case may be, is satisfied that:
The application complies with the circumstances specified in the written direction from the Risk Management Official; and
The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2A1L1applPesticide-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 'Risk Management Plans' of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2, Amherstburg IPZ-1 and Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1: the existing and future application of pesticides such that:
the total pesticide application area is >1ha, chemicals of concern being MCPA and mecoprop, in an IPZ-1 of vulnerability score 9
the total pesticide application area is >10 ha, chemicals of concern being atrazine, dicamba, 2,4-D, dichloropropene-1, 3, MCPB and metalaxyl, in an IPZ-1 of vulnerability score 9
the total pesticide application area is >10 ha, chemical of concern being MCPA, in an IPZ-2 of vulnerability score 8.1.
The above circumstances apply to both land and structural extermination as defined under the Pesticides Act. The Risk Management Plan (RMP) shall require that the Pesticides Act requirements be fulfilled, and include measures necessary to protect the water such as setbacks from watercourses or drainage systems, timing restrictions (including consideration of weather events) and spills/runoff management. The RMP will also require that the Pesticide Label be followed.
The Risk Management Official will obtain documentation from the property owner to indicate that the Pesticides Act requirements and any other conditions in the RMP are followed. A form may be prescribed for this purpose. The Risk Management Official will have discretion as to what constitutes a satisfactory Risk Management Plan.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the application of pesticides in the above mentioned vulnerable areas.
For future threats, the date of compliance is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Risk Management Official shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the Plan the Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1-applASM-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 ('Prohibited Activities') of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and Amherstburg IPZ-1: the existing (none known to exist) and future application of agricultural source material (ASM).
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1-combinedsewer-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
No new combined sewers shall be permitted in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1.
The above applies to the future significant threat of combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet to surface water, in the vulnerable areas mentioned above. This policy applies to Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) administered by the Ministry of Environment for this activity.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1-hauledsewage-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
No application of hauled sewage shall be permitted in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1.
This policy applies to Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) administered by the Ministry of Environment for this activity.
The above applies to the existing (none known to exist) and future significant threat of land disposal of hauled sewage, in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1-industrialeff-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
No existing (none known to exist) and future systems that collect, transmit or treat industrial sewage and discharge industrial effluent to surface water in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2 and Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 shall be permitted, with one exception. That exception is non-contact cooling water, which should be allowed to be discharged.
No future systems that collect, transmit or treat industrial sewage and discharge industrial effluent to surface water in the Amherstburg IPZ-1 shall be permitted, with one exception. That exception is non-contact cooling water, which should be allowed to be discharged.
This policy applies to Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) administered by the Ministry of Environment for these activities.
In the Amherstburg IPZ-1, the Ministry of Environment shall ensure that the existing and amended or updated Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) include terms and conditions that manage the significant threat activity in order to protect sources of drinking water. For the purpose of this policy, in the Amherstburg IPZ-1, existing threat activities shall include activities related to a complete application made under the Planning Act or Condominium Act or the Building Code or for an Environmental Compliance Approval, if the application is made before the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
The date of compliance for prohibiting existing and future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For managing existing threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1-industrialeff-2 (Prescribed Instrument) |
In reviewing Environmental Compliance Approval (Certificate of Approval) applications for future systems and those for any existing systems that discharge non-contact cooling water to surface water in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1, the Ministry of Environment shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) include terms and conditions that manage the significant threat activity in order to protect sources of drinking water.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of industrial effluent discharges in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance for prohibiting existing and future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For managing existing threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1-livgraz-1 (Planning) |
Changes in use to permit use of the land for agricultural livestock operations (which would be a significant threat within the subject IPZs) will not be permitted.
Agricultural livestock operation will not be included as a permitted use in the Official Plan designations and zoning By-law zones which apply to the vulnerable areas. Changes in use to permit use of the land agricultural livestock operation (which would be a significant threat within the subject IPZs) will not be permitted
This policy will be reflected in the Official Plans at the time of the next Official Plan five year review exercise as per Section 26(1) of the Planning Act, and in Zoning By-laws within 3 years following the Official Plan update.
The above applies to the existing (none known to exist) and future significant threat of the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor containment area or farm animal yard, in the vulnerable areas:
Windsor IPZ-1 and IPZ-2
Amherstburg IPZ -1
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1-storageASM-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activity is designated for the purposes of Section 57 ('Prohibited Activities') of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and Amherstburg IPZ-1: the existing (none known to exist) and future storage of agricultural source material (ASM).
The date of compliance is when Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1-stormwater-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
In reviewing Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) for storm water management facilities which discharge to surface water bodies in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and Amherstburg IPZ-1, the Ministry of Environment shall ensure that the terms and conditions of the Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) adequately manage the future storage of storm water management facilities in order to protect sources of drinking water.
The MOE shall give due consideration to its document, 'Stormwater Management, Planning and Design Manual' (March 2003) in the review of stormwater management applications for the subject areas.
The above applies to the future significant threat of stormwater management, in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
For existing threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities.
The date of compliance for future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W1W2L1A1applPesticide-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
In reviewing applications for Pesticides Permits under the Pesticides Act for the application of pesticides in the Windsor IPZ-1, Windsor IPZ-2, Lakeshore (Belle River) IPZ-1 and the Amherstburg IPZ-1, the Ministry of Environment shall ensure that conditions in the Permit adequately protect the sources of drinking water.
The Source Protection Committee recommends that the terms and conditions include setbacks to watercourses, timing restrictions (including consideration of weather events) and spills/runoff management and other measures necessary to manage the significant threat activity in order to protect sources of drinking water.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the application of pesticide, in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance for future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W2-applNASM-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 'Risk Management Plans' of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-2, in those cases in which the activity is not subject to Provincial Instrument: the future application of non agricultural source material (NASM) such that:
- the application of NASM (no volume threshold) that contains material generated by a meat plant or sewage works and the application could result in pathogen(s) in the surface water.
The Risk Management Plan will include the requirements of a NASM plan as per the Nutrient Management Act, for the application of NASM. Therefore the Risk Management Official (RMO) will obtain documentation from the owner of the facility that demonstrates that the requirements of a NASM plan are met. The RMO will ensure that the owner of the facility has the risk management plan prepared by someone certified to develop a NASM plan that meets the requirements of Reg. 267/03.
The Risk Management Official may require additional conditions in the Risk Management Plan, to be met such that water bodies are protected adequately from the application of NASM. The Risk Management Official will have discretion as to what constitutes a satisfactory Risk Management Plan.
The above applies to the future significant threat of the application of Non Agricultural Source Material (NASM), in the vulnerable area:
- Windsor IPZ-2
For future threats, the date of compliance is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Risk Management Official shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the Plan the Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
W2-bypass/effluent-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
In reviewing Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) for expanded or new wastewater treatment facilities that discharge to surface water by means of designed bypass or other than designed bypass in the Windsor IPZ-2, the Ministry of Environment shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) adequately manage these activities in order to adequately protect future sources of drinking water.The above applies to the future significant threat of sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water and sewage treatment plant effluent discharges, in the vulnerable area mentioned above.
The date of compliance for future threats is when Source Protection Plan takes place. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
W2-storageNASM-1 (Clean Water Act) |
The following activities are designated for the purpose of Section 58 'Risk Management Plans' of the Clean Water Act in the Windsor IPZ-2, in those cases in which the activity is not subject to Provincial Instrument: the future storage of non agricultural source material (NASM) such that:
the NASM (no volume threshold) contains material generated by a meat plant (e.g. slaughter plant, meat packaging, defined as per O. Reg. 31/05 under the Food Safety and Quality Act) when any portion of NASM is stored at or above grade, and a spill or runoff could result in pathogen/s in the surface water.
The Risk Management Plan will include the requirements of a NASM plan as per the Nutrient Management Act, for the storage of NASM. Therefore the Risk Management Official (RMO) will obtain documentation from the owner of the facility that demonstrates that the requirements of a NASM plan are met. The RMO will ensure that the owner has the risk management plan prepared by someone certified to develop a NASM plan that meets the requirements of Reg. 267/03.
The Risk Management Official may require additional conditions in the Risk Management Plan, to be met such that water bodies are protected adequately from the storage of NASM. The Risk Management Official will have discretion as to what constitutes a satisfactory Risk Management Plan.
The above applies to the future significant threat of the storage of Non Agricultural Source Material (NASM), in the vulnerable area:
Windsor IPZ-2
For future threats, the date of compliance is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Risk Management Official shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the Plan takes effect. |
Essex |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
W2applNASM-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
NOTE: There are no agricultural lands in Essex – this policy intended to cover off-farm application and/or storage of NASM as processed organic waste (i.e. biosolids).
In reviewing Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) applications under the Environmental Protection Act for the application of non-agricultural source material (NASM) in the Windsor IPZ-2, the Ministry of Environment shall ensure that the terms and conditions in the Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) adequately protect the sources of drinking water.
The Source Protection Committee recommends that the terms and conditions include setbacks to watercourses, timing restrictions (including consideration of weather events), spills/runoff management and other measures necessary to manage the significant threat activity in order to protect sources of drinking water.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the application of Non Agricultural Source Material (NASM) in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance for future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W2bypass-1(Specify Action) |
The City of Windsor will continue to meet the requirements of the Environmental Compliance Approval (Certificate of Approval) (or any updates or replacements to it) under the Ontario Water Resources Act for the Little River Pollution Control Plant (LRPCP) and continue its current monitoring scheme which includes the testing of mercury and PCBs in the raw wastewater and E. coli in the bypass. The City of Windsor will also give due consideration to the reduction of the frequency and volumes of bypasses through sewer separation and downspout disconnection programs, and other such measures while developing plans or strategies to manage storm water and sewers. The City of Windsor will initiate the development of plans or strategies, to manage storm water and sewers, when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of sewage treatment plant bypass discharge to surface water, in the vulnerable area:
Windsor IPZ-2 |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W2E-PI |
Where an existing waste disposal site is in an area where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the waste disposal site includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the waste disposal site (existing) ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. Expansions to existing activities are permitted provided that the activity can be adequately managed.
Monitoring policy M1 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
W2effluent-1(Specify Action) |
The City of Windsor will continue to meet the requirements of the Environmental Compliance Approval (Certificate of Approval), and will add to its current monitoring scheme the testing of 2-methyl-4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in the effluent discharge, such that MCPA is tested at least once a year at the same sampling point and in the
same manner as is done for other pesticides. The City of Windsor will set up a testing schedule when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of sewage treatment plant effluent discharges in the vulnerable area:
Windsor IPZ-2 |
Essex |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
W2storageNASM-1 (Prescribed Instrument) |
NOTE: There are no agricultural lands in Essex – this policy intended to cover off-farm application and/or storage of NASM as processed organic waste (i.e. biosolids).
In reviewing Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) applications under the Environmental Protection Act for the application of non-agricultural source material (NASM) in the Windsor IPZ-2, the Ministry of Environment shall ensure that the terms and conditions in the Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) adequately protect the sources of drinking water.
The Source Protection Committee recommends that the terms and conditions in the Environmental Compliance Approvals (Certificates of Approval) include design and construction requirements, setbacks to watercourses, spills/runoff management and other measures necessary to manage the significant threat activity in order to protect sources of drinking water.
The above applies to the existing and future significant threat of the storage of Non Agricultural Source Material (NASM), in the vulnerable areas mentioned above.
The date of compliance for future threats is when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
For existing threats, the Ministry of the Environment shall comply with the policy within 5 years from the date the plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities. |
Essex |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
W3F-PI |
For activities requiring approval under the Environmental Protection Act:
No waste disposal sites (future) shall be established where the establishment, operation and maintenance of a waste disposal site would be a significant drinking water threat.
Monitoring policy M1 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WAST(a)-1 |
The existing and future application of untreated septage to land is prohibited where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(a)-2 |
Where the future application of untreated septage to land would be a moderate or low drinking water threat, the MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the application of untreated septage to land is managed in accordance with applicable legislation and policy.
|
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Low, Moderate |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(a)-3 |
The MOE should undertake research around hauled sewage treatment options and the opportunity to create environmentally friendly usable by-products (e.g. compost) to negate the need of spreading untreated septage within vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant, moderate or low drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Low, Moderate, Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(b)-1 |
Where the Environmental Protection Act does not require an approval, the existing establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act (PCB Waste Storage and the storage of hazardous liquid industrial waste, excluding the storage of wastes described in clauses p,q,r,s,t,u of the definition of hazardous waste (O.Reg 347)) is designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and therefore requires a risk management plan where the activity is a significant drinking water threat. The risk management plan, at a minimum, will be based on contemporary standards, and include appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(b)-2 |
Where the Environmental Protection Act does not require an approval, the future establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act (PCB waste management system and the storage of hazardous liquid industrial waste, excluding the storage of wastes described in clauses p,q,r,s,t ,u of the definition of hazardous waste (O.Reg 347)) is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(b)-3 |
Where the existing establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act is a significant drinking water threat, the MOE shall ensure the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(b)-4 |
The future establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act is prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future, Future |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(b)-5 |
Municipalities responsible for waste management are required to consider ways in which additional opportunities for household hazardous waste disposal can be provided to those handling and storing pesticides, organic solvents, and DNAPLs to ensure they are properly removed from vulnerable areas where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(c)-1 |
Where the existing disposal of mine tailings is a significant drinking water threat, the MOE shall ensure that the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the disposal of mine tailings includes appropriate terms and conditions to ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Existing |
1 |
False |
|
WAST(c)-2 |
The future disposal of mine tailings is prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Lakes Simcoe and Couchiching/Black River, Nottawasaga Valley, Severn Sound |
Significant |
Future |
1 |
False |
|
WASTE-1 |
Where an existing waste disposal site is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall ensure that the Approvals (under the Environmental Protection Act, 1990 or Ontario Water Resources Act, 1990) include conditions and reporting requirements to manage the risk so that it ceases to be a significant threat.
If the Environmental Compliance Approval is not sufficient to manage the risk, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall amend it to include additional terms and conditions. It is recommended that the following conditions be included:
Operations manuals should be reviewed to ensure they have appropriate contingencies and monitoring requirements;
Setbacks should be increased from wellheads and intake zones, as appropriate;
Requirements should be added regarding closure and abandonment of waste sites to ensure they do not pose a risk to drinking water sources;
Protective conditions should be added for groundwater and surface water during spreading of hauled sewage; and
Conditions relating to maintenance of mine tailings storage ponds and closure plans for these ponds to ensure sources of drinking water are protected.
Instruments that exist before the day the Plan takes effect must be reviewed and, if necessary, amended within three years.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-3. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-1-LB-PI-MC |
Where an existing waste disposal site is a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B, the MOE shall ensure that the Prescribed Instrument that governs the site (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval required under the Environmental Protection Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act) includes appropriate terms and conditions to manage the threat so that it ceases to be significant. Where the Director considers it appropriate, terms and conditions will include modern design, operational, monitoring and reporting requirements as well as requirements for eventual closure and abandonment. The MOE shall review, and if necessary amend, the Prescribed Instrument within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-2 |
The future establishment of a waste disposal site shall be prohibited where it is a significant drinking water threat.
Accordingly, decisions relating to Prescribed Instruments (Environmental Compliance Approvals) must conform with this policy. In addition, decisions made by planning authorities under the Planning Act, 1990 must conform with this policy.
This policy does not apply to waste that is registered with the MOECC waste generation reporting system, or waste that is approved to be transported off-site using the MOECC manifest process or waste that is subject to Director's Instructions.
This policy takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-2 and MONITORING-3.
|
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-2-LB-S58 |
An existing waste disposal site that is not governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Certificate of Approval or Environmental Compliance Approval) is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, requiring a Risk Management Plan in areas where it is a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B. Risk Management Plans for existing waste disposal sites shall be established within three years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. This policy does not apply to waste that is registered with the MOE waste generation reporting ystem or waste that is approved to be transported off-site using the MOE manifest process or waste that is subject to Director's Instructions. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-3 |
Where the Environmental Protection Act, 1990 (as amended) does not require an approval, the existing operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (Risk Management Plan) where this activity is a significant drinking water threat. This includes, but is not limited to, PCB waste storage. The Risk Management Plan shall include the following:
Inclusion of the most up-to-date best management practices regarding PCB waste storage, waste, and other harmful compounds
A spill/emergency response plan which includes procedures to contact the local drinking water plant operator
This policy does not apply to waste that is registered with the MOECC waste generation reporting system, or waste that is approved to be transported off-site using the MOECC manifest process or waste that is subject to Director's Instructions.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1, GENERAL-5, and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-3-LB-PI-MC |
Future waste disposal sites are prohibited where they would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B. Accordingly, decisions to issue, otherwise create or amend Prescribed Instruments (Environmental Compliance Approvals under the Environmental Protection Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act) must conform with this policy. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-4 |
Where the Environmental Protection Act, 1990 (as amended) does not require an approval, the future establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site is designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act, 2006 (prohibition) where it would be a significant drinking water threat. This includes, but is not limited to, PCB waste storage.
This policy does not apply to waste that is registered with the MOECC waste generation reporting system, or waste that is approved to be transported off-site using the MOECC manifest process or waste that is subject to Director's Instructions.
This prohibition takes effect when the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Note: Additional policies apply. See: MONITORING-1 and GENERAL-6. |
Raisin Region, South Nation |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-4-LB-S57 |
Future waste disposal sites that are not governed by a Prescribed Instrument (Environmental Compliance Approval) are designated as prohibited under section 57 of the Clean Water Act in areas where they would be a significant drinking water threat as described in Appendix B. This policy does not apply to waste that is registered with the MOECC waste generation reporting system or waste that is approved to be transported off-site using the MOECC manifest process or waste that is subject to Director's Instructions. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-5-LB-PI-HR |
MOE shall consider the potential impact on drinking water sources during their review of applications for Prescribed Instruments (Environmental Compliance Approvals under the Environmental Protection Act and the Ontario Water Resources Act) for the establishment of new waste disposal sites where they would be a moderate or low drinking water threat in Highly Vulnerable Aquifers as described in Appendix B. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WASTE-6-NLB |
The MOE and Environment Canada are strongly encouraged to consider the potential impact on drinking water sources during their review of applications for other approvals (that are not Prescribed Instruments) required for new waste disposal sites where the site would be a moderate or low drinking water threat in Highly Vulnerable Aquifers as described in Appendix B. Action to implement this policy should be initiated within one year from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Mississippi Valley, Rideau Valley |
Low, Moderate |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-1.1.1 |
This source protection plan came into effect on July 1, 2016, the effective date specified in the Notice of Approval posted on the Environmental Registry of Ontario. Amendments to the Source Protection Plan are permitted in accordance with the CWA, and the General Regulations. The effective date for amended policies, only including but not limited to the addition of Future drinking water threats and regulated areas and activities, is the date of posting of the Notice of Approval of the amendment provisions on the Environmental Registry of Ontario.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Unknown |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-1.1.2 |
Except as set out below, the policies contained in this Source Protection Plan shall come into effect on the date set out by the Minister.
a. For Section 57 of the CWA, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before this Source Protection Plan takes effect, policies regarding prohibited activities do not apply to a person who engages in the activity at that location until 180 days from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
b. For Section 58 of the CWA, if an activity was engaged in at a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan takes effect and the Risk Management Official gives notice to a person who is engaged in the activity at that location, policies regarding regulated activities apply to the person who engages in the activity at that location on and after a date specified in the notice that is at least 120 days after the date the notice is given;
c. For Section 59 of the CWA, policies regarding restricted land uses shall come into effect the same day the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect;
d. Where the Source Protection Policies require the municipality to develop and implement education and outreach programs as the primary tool for managing or eliminating a particular significant threat, such programs shall be developed and implemented within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
e. For Sections 43 of the CWA, if an activity was engaged in a particular location before the relevant policies within this Source Protection Plan takes effect, amendments to Prescribed Instruments shall be completed within three (3) years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect; and,
f. For Section 40 and 42 of the CWA, 2006, the Official Plan must be amended to conform with the significant threat policies within five (5) years from the date the relevant policies within the Source Protection Plan takes effect or the next Official Plan review required under Section 26 of the Planning Act and the Zoning By-law within two (2) years from adoption of the Official Plan conformity amendment.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-1.2 |
For the purposes of this Plan, where one or more of the following:
A complete application for development under the Planning Act or Condominium Act;
An application for Environmental Compliance Approval; or
An application for a Building Permit
has been received by the applicable implementing body prior to the date this Source Protection Plan takes effect, a related significant drinking water threat may be considered as Existing and subject to the policies pertaining to Existing significant drinking water threats. Where the above noted applications have lapsed or been withdrawn, the above noted transition policies shall no longer apply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-1.23 |
The Source Protection Plan provides policies to meet the objectives of the CWA. The Source Protection Plan consists of the written policy text and Schedules.
a. The Schedules in the Source Protection Plan identify the areas where the
policies of the Source Protection Plan apply. The boundaries for the
circumstances shown on the Plan Schedules are general. More detailed
interpretation of the boundaries relies on the mapping in the approved
Assessment Report and the Specific Circumstances found in the Source Water Protection Tables of Threats
and Circumstances, CWA.
b. Where any Act or portion of an Act of the Ontario Government or Canadian
Government is referenced in this Plan, such reference shall be interpreted
to refer to any subsequent renaming of sections in the Act as well as any
subsequent amendments to the Act, or successor thereof. This provision is
also applicable to any policy statement, regulation or guideline issued by
the Province or the municipality. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-1.3 |
In accordance with Section 59 of the CWA, all land uses, except solely residential uses, where significant drinking water threat activities have been designated for the purposes of Sections 57 and 58 of the CWA, 2006 are hereby designated as Restricted Land Uses and a written notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit, Planning Act or Condominium Act application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or Chief Building Official may be permitted to make the determination that a site specific land use is, or is not, that a site specific land use is not designated for the purposes of section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or Chief Building Official, as applicable, is satisfied that:
a. The application complies with the written direction issued by the Risk Management Official; and
b. The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
Where the Risk Management Official has provided written direction designating a land use for the purpose of section 59, a written Notice from the Risk Management Official shall be required prior to approval of any Building Permit under the Building Code Act, 1992 as amended, in addition to Planning Act and Condominium Act applications in accordance with Section 59 of the CWA.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-1.5 |
The municipality, in collaboration with Conservation Authorities and other bodies
wherever possible, may develop and implement education and outreach programs
directed at any, or all, significant drinking water threat prescribed under the CWA,
where such programs are deemed necessary and/or appropriate
by the municipality and subject to available funding. Such programs may include,
but not necessarily be limited to, increasing awareness and understanding of
significant drinking water threats and promotion of best management practices. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-1.6 |
The County and/or municipality, in collaboration with other bodies and levels of
government wherever possible, may develop and implement incentive programs
directed at various significant threat activities and/or condition sites prescribed
under the CWA, where such programs are deemed necessary
and/or appropriate by the County and/or municipality, subject to available funding. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-10.1 |
To ensure the Existing or Future application of pesticides within the meaning of Part I of the Pesticide Act on lands greater than one (1) hectare ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-11.1 |
To ensure the handling and storage of pesticides within the meaning of Part I of the Pesticide Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required for:
a. any Existing activity; or
b. any Future activity within WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-11.2 |
To ensure any Future handling and storage of pesticides within the meaning of Part I of the Pesticide Act never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1,this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-12.02 |
To ensure the application, handling and storage of road Salt cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats, the municipality should review available training programs related to Salt application and storage and ensure that adequate training opportunities are available to train municipal staff and private contractors on best management practices related to Salt application and storage. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-12.1 |
To ensure any Existing or Future application of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the municipality and/or County of Wellington shall review and, if necessary, revise or issue new Salt Management Plans for the application of Salt on roadways.
The Salt Management Plan shall include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location reduce the potential for Salt-related surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration and meet the objectives of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for Environmental Management of Road Salts including the Salt vulnerable area mapping to include areas where significant threats can occur. Where an RMP applies to municipal Salt application, the Salt Management Plan shall be incorporated into the RMP.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-12.2 |
To ensure any Existing or Future application of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA, and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where all of the following applies:
a. the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
b. Salt is or could be applied to the property;
c. the Salt Application Area is equal to or greater than 200 square metres or 8 parking spots; and
d. the property is used for any land uses except residential consisting of four units or fewer.
Notwithstanding the above, a Risk Management Plan will also be required for any municipal properties where the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-12.5 |
To ensure any Existing or Future application of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, and to minimize the impacts from this activity through Existing or Future transport pathways within a Chloride ICA, the municipality shall review whether the transport pathways increase infiltration of chloride to the groundwater and what actions can be taken by the municipality to reduce the infiltration of chloride.
Actions may include, but are not limited to, incorporating terms and conditions into Risk Management Plans, maintenance or removal of transport pathways, direction to other parties regarding maintenance or removal of transport pathways, reduction of Salt application within the area of the transport pathway, and advocating the MiECP or Ministry of Transportation for actions to reduce the infiltration of chloride or other measures as required.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-12.7 |
To ensure any Existing or Future application of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a Chloride ICA, the municipality and/or the Public Health Unit shall develop and implement an education initiative addressing the application of road Salt. The education program shall encourage the implementation of best management practices that form the core of the Smart About Salt or similar accreditation program to reduce the impact of winter de-icing activities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-13.1 |
To ensure the handling and storage of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the following apply:
a. any Existing activity outside of an ICA but within WHPA-A and WHPA-B with a vulnerability score of ten (10) or IPZ-1 with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10); or
b. any Future activity within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10)
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-13.2 |
To ensure any Future handling and storage of road Salt never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1 outside of an ICA, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-13.2.1 |
To ensure the handling and storage of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A within a Chloride ICA, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited where the following apply:
a. any Existing or Future handling and storage of road Salt in any amount that is stored uncovered; or
b. any Future handling and storage of road Salt in covered storage in amounts greater than 100 kilograms.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-13.2.2 |
To ensure the handling and storage of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a Chloride ICA, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the following apply:
a. any Existing or Future handling and storage of road Salt, outside of a WHPA-A, in any amount that is stored uncovered; or
b. any Existing or Future handling and storage of road Salt, outside of a WHPA-A, in covered storage in amounts greater than 100 kilograms; or
c. any Existing or Future handling and storage of road Salt, for a property that requires a salt application Risk Management Plan, in uncovered or covered storage of any amount; or
d. any Existing or Future handling and storage of road Salt at a municipal property, in uncovered or covered storage of any amount;
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-13.3 |
To ensure any Existing or Future handling and storage of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat within a Chloride ICA, the municipality and/or the Public Health Unit shall develop and implement an education initiative about the handling and storage of road Salt. The education program shall encourage the implementation of the best management practices that form the core of the Smart About Salt or similar accreditation program to reduce the impact of winter de-icing activities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-14.1 |
To ensure the storage of snow ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the following apply:
a. any Existing activity outside of a Chloride ICA and within WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or IPZ-1 with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10); or
b. any Future activity outside of a Chloride ICA and within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10),
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-14.2 |
To ensure any Future snow storage within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1 outside of a Chloride ICA never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-14.3 |
To ensure any Existing or Future snow storage ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the municipality shall develop and implement an education initiative about snow storage. The education program shall encourage the use of best management practices that reduce the impact on groundwater. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-14.4 |
To ensure any Future, below grade snow storage greater than 0.01 hectare in area or at or above grade snow storage greater than 1 hectare in area never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A in a Chloride ICA, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-14.5 |
To ensure any Existing or Future facility for snow storage ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a Chloride ICA, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where all of the following apply:
a. a prohibition policy does not apply;
b. Salt is or could be applied to the property;
c. the Salt Application Area is equal to or greater than 200 square metres or 8 parking spots; and
d. the property is used for any land uses except residential consisting of four units or fewer.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-15.1 |
To ensure the Existing and Future handling and storage of fuel more than 250 Litres
but not more than 2500 Litres ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking
water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat,
the municipality shall develop and implement an education and outreach program
for property owners with identified fuel oil tanks outlining the requirements under the
fuel oil code by the Technical Standards and Safety Authority and best
management practices that could be implemented. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-15.2 |
To ensure the handling and storage of fuel ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the following apply:
a. any Existing handling and storage of liquid fuel of more than 2,500 Litres; or
b. any Future handling and storage of liquid fuel of more than 2,500 Litres within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10).
For significant threats that are Technical Standards and Safety Authority regulated, the Risk Management Plan may be at a minimum scoped to address matters such as a contaminant management plan and any monitoring, reporting completed by the proponent/applicant and auditing requirements provided to the Technical Standards and Safety Authority. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-15.3 |
To ensure any Future handling and storage of liquid of more than 2,500 Litres never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited.
Notwithstanding this prohibition, fuel handling and storage required for emergency back-up generators within these vulnerable areas may be permitted subject to a Risk Management Plan in accordance with policy WC-CW-15.2.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-16.1 |
To ensure any Existing handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional or agricultural purposes ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan is required where the following apply:
a. Any quantity of dense non-aqueous phase liquid in a WHPA-A, WHPA-B or IPZ-1, with a vulnerability score of ten (10), including within an ICA for trichloroethylene (TCE); or
b. Any quantity of the following chlorinated solvents in a WHPA-B or WHPA-C, with a vulnerability score less than ten (10), including within an ICA for trichloroethylene, or within a WHPA-D in an ICA for trichloroethylene:
• Dioxane-1,4
• Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
• Trichloroethylene or another DNAPL that could degrade to Trichloroethylene
• Vinyl chloride or another DNAPL that could degrade to vinyl chloride; or
c. 25 Litres or greater of Poly Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a WHPA-B or WHPA-C, with a vulnerability score less than ten (10), including within an ICA for trichloroethylene, or within a WHPA-D in an ICA for trichloroethylene.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-16.2 |
To ensure any Future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial institutional or agricultural purposes never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within WHPA-A or IPZ-1, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-16.3 |
To ensure any Future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase liquid for industrial, commercial, institutional or agricultural purposes within a WHPA-B, C or TCE ICA, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the following apply:
a. Any quantity of dense non-aqueous phase liquid in a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score 10, including within an ICA for trichloroethylene; or
b. Any quantity of the following chlorinated solvents in a WHPA-B or WHPA-C, with a vulnerability score < 10, including within an ICA for trichloroethylene, or within a WHPA-D in an ICA for trichloroethylene:
• Dioxane-1,4
• Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
• Trichloroethylene or another DNAPL that could degrade to Trichloroethylene
• Vinyl chloride or another DNAPL that could degrade to vinyl chloride; or
c. 25 Litres or greater of Poly Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in a WHPA-B or WHPA-C, with a vulnerability score < 10, including within an ICA for trichloroethylene, or within a WHPA-D in an ICA for trichloroethylene.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-16.4 |
To ensure an Existing or Future handling and storage of a dense non-aqueous phase
liquid ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this
activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the municipality shall
develop and implement education and outreach programs to encourage the use of
alternative products where available and the proper handling/storage and disposal
procedures for these products. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-17.1 |
To ensure the handling and storage of an organic solvent ceases to be or never becomes significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where the following apply:
a. any Existing activity; or
b. any Future activity within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-17.2 |
To ensure any Future handling and storage of organic solvents never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within WHPA-A or IPZ-1, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-18.1 |
To ensure any Future airports where there could be runoff containing de-icing chemicals, never become a significant drinking threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-19.1 |
To ensure the use of land for Existing or Future livestock grazing or pasturing ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or IPZ-1, these activities shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-19.2 |
To ensure the use of land as a farm animal yard or an outdoor confinement area as defined in O. Reg. 267/03, for Existing or Future livestock operations, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a nutrient management plan and/or strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-19.4 |
To ensure the use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or farm animal yard ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a Nitrate ICA where the vulnerability score is less than 10, the municipality shall develop and implement an education initiative for this activity.
The education program shall encourage the use of best management practices that reduce the impact on groundwater.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-2.2 |
To ensure an Existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the EPA which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan is required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-2.4 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a Future waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the EPA which does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be, a significant drinking water threat this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-21.1 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking and/or any Recharge Reducing Activity cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats as prescribed by the CWA, the Township of Centre Wellington shall: develop, maintain and implement a long-term monitoring program of groundwater and surface water systems to assess potential groundwater and/or surface water impacts from Consumptive Water Takings and/or Recharge Reducing Activities within the Centre Wellington WHPA-Q. The design and implementation of this monitoring program shall consider the recommendations from the Centre Wellington Tier 3 Study, the Centre Wellington Water Supply Master Plan, future municipal exploratory drilling programs, Class Environmental Assessments for municipal wells, municipal wellfield capacity studies and / or other studies required through the Centre Wellington PTTW / Drinking Water Works Permit. The development, maintenance and implementation of this program, where possible shall be carried out by the Township of Centre Wellington in collaboration with the County, other potentially affected Municipalities, the MECP and the GRCA.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-21.2 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking and/or any Recharge Reducing Activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats as prescribed by the CWA, the GRCA, the Municipalities and the County shall mutually share information to collaboratively manage water resources within the Centre Wellington WHPA-Q. This may include, but is not limited to, the sharing of data, use, and/or management of the Tier 3 Model; and/or discussion related to Consumptive Water Takings, areas of recharge reduction and/or actions taken by the parties.
The Township of Centre Wellington shall develop, in cooperation with the County, GRCA, Municipalities and the MECP, an information-sharing document that includes requirements for meetings, including frequency, agendas and participants, and for the nature, format and types of information to be mutually shared. Consideration should also be given to linking in other groups such as Grand River Water Managers and / or Low Water Response Group to this process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-21.4 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking and/or Recharge Reducing Activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats as prescribed by the CWA, the Municipalities shall implement and maintain public education and outreach initiatives regarding water conservation and the use of best management practices that reduce the impact on groundwater recharge. Where possible, these education and outreach initiatives will be coordinated with other Municipalities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-22.4 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the Township of Centre Wellington shall use the Tier 3 Model and Tier 3 Study results / recommendations in Class Environmental Assessment processes for new or expanded municipal takings, where those new or expanded municipal takings could improve the assigned risk level for the Centre Wellington WHPA-Q. For context, this policy is meant to provide support, through the MECP PTTW processes to ensure the provision and distribution of municipal water supply to support County population and growth forecasts. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-22.5 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the Township of Centre Wellington shall promote water conservation and demand management to all Township of Centre Wellington municipal water users within the Centre Wellington WHPA-Q as outlined in the Township of Centre Wellington Water Supply Master Plan.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-22.6 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat the Township of Centre Wellington shall evaluate opportunities to optimize its water systems based on the source protection water quantity technical work, and where appropriate develop, maintain, and enhance water supply system optimization programs. The design and implementation of these programs shall consider, where appropriate, the recommendations from the Centre Wellington Tier 3 Study, the Centre Wellington Water Supply Master Plan, future municipal exploratory drilling programs, Class Environmental Assessments for municipal wells, municipal wellfield capacity studies and / or other studies required through the Centre Wellington PTTW / Drinking Water Works Permit.
Optimization strategies at Existing municipal well locations to be considered include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. optimizing existing capacity to realize existing permitted capacity;
b. exploring the potential for expanding the existing capacity beyond the current permitted capacity; and/ or
c. balancing the municipal pumping to optimize/maximize municipal water taking.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-23.6 |
To ensure that any Recharge Reducing Activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, Municipalities, where appropriate, shall develop and update design standards (e.g., development manuals, design guidelines) for maintaining and enhancing groundwater recharge. These shall include implementation of LID, minimizing impervious surfaces and / or lot level infiltration for the purposes of maintaining recharge function. The design standards shall consider water quality when recommending best management practices and address how recharge will be maintained and water quality will be protected including consideration of how water quality will be protected from application and storage of winter maintenance materials including Salt. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-3.1 |
To ensure Existing or Future onsite sewage systems and onsite holding tanks with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the municipality shall implement an on-site sewage system maintenance inspection program. Inspections shall be prioritized based on the proximity to the drinking water supply. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-3.2 |
To ensure Existing or Future onsite sewage systems and onsite holding tanks with a design flow of less than or equal to 10,000 Litres per day and subject to approval under the Ontario Building Code Act or the Ontario Water Resources Act cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the municipality shall develop and implement an education initiative about small onsite sewage systems and holding tanks. The education program shall encourage the use of beneficial management practices that reduce the impact on groundwater. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-3.8 |
To ensure any Existing or Future Stormwater Management Facility ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA, and a Risk Management Plan shall be required where all of the following apply:
a. the activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat;
b. the Stormwater Management Facility is located within a Chloride ICA; and
c. the Stormwater Management Facility does not require an Environmental Compliance Approval.
This policy does not apply if the Stormwater Management Facility and/or Sewage Works consists solely of measures used to infiltrate roof run-off and/or groundwater from foundation drains or sumps.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-4.1 |
To ensure the Existing or Future application of agricultural source material to land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-4.2 |
To ensure the Existing or Future application of agricultural source material to land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), or a Nitrate ICA outside of a WHPA-A, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required.
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a Nutrient Management Plan and/or strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-4.4 |
To ensure the Existing or Future application and storage of agricultural source material cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats, the municipality shall develop and implement an education initiative about the application and storage of agricultural source material. The education program shall encourage the use of beneficial management practices that reduce the impact on groundwater. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-5.1 |
To ensure any Future storage of agricultural source material on lands never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-5.2 |
To ensure the storage of agricultural source material ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan is required where the following apply:
a. any Existing activity within a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), IPZ-1, or a Nitrate ICA; or
b. any Future activity within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or a Nitrate ICA outside of a WHPA-A,
The requirements of the Risk Management Plan will generally be based on the requirements of a nutrient management plan and/or strategy under the Nutrient Management Act, but may also include any modifications or additional requirements deemed necessary or appropriate by the Risk Management Official.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-7.2 |
To ensure any Future handling and storage of non-agricultural source material never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1 this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-8.1 |
To ensure the Existing or Future application of commercial fertilizer to agricultural and non-agricultural land (excluding by an individual for personal or family use) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-8.3 |
To ensure the Existing or Future application of commercial fertilizer to agricultural land and non-agricultural lands (excluding by an individual for personal or family use) ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or a Nitrate ICA outside of a WHPA-A, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-8.4 |
To ensure the Existing and Future application or handling and storage of commercial fertilizer cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats, the Municipality shall develop and implement an education and outreach program targeted towards:
a. An individual for personal or family use to promote timely fertilizer application and best management practices in urban settings; and
b. Agricultural lands and non-agricultural lands to promote best management practices to safeguard water supplies from drinking water threats.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-9.1 |
To ensure the handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms of commercial fertilizer as defined in O. Reg. 267/03 ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, this activity is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the CWA and a Risk Management Plan is required where the following apply:
a. any Existing activity within a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), an IPZ-1, or a Nitrate ICA; or
b. any Future activity within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), or a Nitrate ICA outside of a WHPA-A. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW-9.2 |
To ensure the Future handling and storage of more than 2,500 kilograms of commercial fertilizer as defined in O. Reg. 267/03 never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A and IPZ- 1, this activity shall be designated for the purpose of Section 57 of the CWA and shall be prohibited. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-CW/NB-12.3 |
To ensure any Existing or Future application of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the County, municipality and the Ministry of Transportation should assess current road infrastructure and consider enhancing road design measures for modifying, widening or expanding existing roads and/or designing/developing new roads to minimize the impact from any application of Salt on roadways where the following apply:
a. In WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability is equal to ten (10); or
b. Within a Chloride ICA.
The assessment should make recommendations for enhanced measures to protect drinking water sources to be carried through detailed design and construction of the road. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-1.16 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the MECP shall
a. Ensure that all Prescribed Instruments issued for Condition sites include terms and conditions, as appropriate, to ensure that the risk to drinking water sources is managed. Appropriate conditions may include requirements for source control, remediation to provincial standards, monitoring and Contaminant Management Plans;
b. Ensure that Prescribed Instruments include a condition requiring the instrument holder to report on the actions taken and the status of the site to the MECP, Source Protection Authority and the municipality on an annual basis; and
c. Provide to the County and/or municipality a copy of the new or revised Prescribed Instrument.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-1.21 |
Any Prescribed Instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act that is created or amended or is used for the purposes of obtaining an exemption from a Risk Management Plan under section 61 of O. Reg. 287/07 shall incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, manage the activities they regulate such that those activities cease to be or never become, a significant drinking water threat. The OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions, including the Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by the OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-1.4 |
The County and/or Municipality shall amend, as required, their Official Plan and Zoning By-Laws to:
a. Identify the vulnerable areas in which drinking water threats prescribed under the CWA would be significant;
b. Indicate that within the areas identified, any use or activity that is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat is required to conform with all applicable Source Protection Plan policies and, as such, may be prohibited, restricted or otherwise regulated by those policies;
c. Incorporate any other amendments required to conform with the threat specific land use policies identified in this Source Protection Plan.
Consistent with the above policy direction, the County and/or Municipality shall amend, as required, their Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking and/or Recharge Reducing Activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-1.4.1 |
The County working with the Risk Management Official, shall prepare a terms of reference for Drinking Water Threat Disclosure Reports that outlines the information that applicants are required to provide within Drinking Water Threat Disclosure Reports which are required as part of a complete application or as a condition of site plan control for the development, redevelopment or site alteration of non-residential uses within a WHPA, IPZ or ICA as may be required pursuant of the Official Plans of the County of Wellington and other Municipalities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-12.01 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a system that collects, stores, transmits, treats or disposes of sewage, the application, handling or storage of road Salt, and the storage of snow never become significant drinking water threats,
a. the County of Wellington and Municipality shall generally require Future development to be designed using best management practices addressing these activities, and
b. the County shall provide appropriate Official Plan policies and study requirements for complete applications for Future developments within the Chloride ICA,
where all of the following apply:
i. the activities would be significant drinking water threats,
ii. within a Chloride Issues Contributing Area,
iii. in an area with any land use except residential consisting of four units or fewer, and
iv. the Salt Application Area is equal to or greater than 200 square metres or 8 parking spaces
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-15.4 |
To ensure any Existing or Future handling and storage of fuel on properties licensed under the ARA ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat,
a. The MNRF shall review all licenses, permits and site plans issued under the ARA and/or related regulations, standards and policies and, if necessary, include measures that, when implemented, will manage the risk so that these activities do not become or cease to be a significant drinking water threat.
b. The MNRF shall not issue new or amended licenses or permits and approve site plans under the ARA and/or related regulations, standards and policies unless measures that, when implemented, will manage the risk so that these activities do not become or cease to be a significant drinking water threat.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Existing, Existing, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-19.3 |
The OMAFRA shall review and, if necessary, amend the required Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy to ensure that such Plan/Strategy incorporates measures and/or terms and conditions deemed necessary to ensure the use of land as a farm animal yard or an outdoor confinement area as defined in O. Reg. 267/03, for Existing or Future livestock operations with an existing or requiring a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-2.1 |
To ensure an Existing waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the EPA that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the MECP shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to ensure that terms and conditions are incorporated that, when implemented, ensure that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-2.3 |
To ensure the establishment, operation or maintenance of a Future waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the EPA that is subject to an Environmental Compliance Approval, never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the MECP and Parks shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-22.1 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the MECP shall review and, if necessary, amend existing PTTWs and / or Drinking Water Works Permits to ensure that the Municipal Supply will not be adversely impacted, taking into consideration Tier 3 Study results / recommendations, water supply requirements for planned growth and prolonged drought outlined in Water Supply Master Plans and available data, reports and / or recommendations from monitoring programs established pursuant to policies in the County of Wellington Chapter of the Grand River Source Protection Plan. The MECP, where appropriate, shall consider establishing conditions in PTTWs and Drinking Water Works Permits to achieve this objective including but not limited to conditions which require:
a. groundwater and surface water monitoring related to municipal drinking water supplies;
b. assessment of demand management: water needs assessment (review of permitted maximum takings) and water efficiency measures;
c. a phased approach to assess impacts;
d. information sharing with the MECP, County, Municipalities and conservation authorities including a condition of approval for permit holders to provide Municipalities and conservation authorities technical reports and monitoring data gathered pursuant to a condition of the PTTW (as per bullet a.) above);
e. measures to increase the optimization of the municipal water supply system
where appropriate; and
f. drought management planning for drought sensitive wells/systems.
The MECP shall circulate Environmental Registry notices for proposed new or amended PTTWs and Drinking Water Works Permits to the County, Municipalities
and GRCA and have due regard for comments from the GRCA, County, and the Municipalities regarding proposed new or amended PTTWs and Drinking Water
Works Permits and new or revised conditions of approvals related thereto.
For new or expanded municipal takings that could improve the assigned risk level for the Centre Wellington WHPA-Q, the MECP shall ensure pre-consultation, engagement and information sharing with the County, any relevant Municipalities and the GRCA and shall include use of the Tier 3 Model, Tier 3 Study results / recommendations and Water Supply Master Plan results / recommendations to ensure the provision and distribution of municipal water supply to support County population and growth forecasts.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-22.10 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, Municipalities, when reviewing planning applications for New development requiring a new or amended PTTW for groundwater taking within a WHPA-Q, shall consult with the MECP to discuss any necessary approval conditions of the PTTW.
Municipalities shall consider the use of holding zone provisions or a community planning permit in order to ensure that a PTTW, if required, is in place prior to the commencement of any development activity.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-22.2 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the MECP shall issue PTTWs and / or Drinking Water Works Permits which ensure that the Municipal Supply will not be adversely impacted. To achieve this, the MECP, where appropriate, shall consider the following in its evaluation of PTTW and / or Drinking Water Works Permit applications:
i. requiring permit applicants to use the Tier 3 Model,
ii. Tier 3 Study results / recommendations;
iii. Water supply requirements for planned growth and prolonged drought outlined in Water Supply Master Plans; and
iv. available data, reports and/or recommendations from monitoring programs established pursuant to policies in the County of Wellington Chapter of the Grand River Source Protection Plan.
The MECP, where appropriate, shall consider establishing approval conditions in PTTWs and Drinking Water Works Permits to achieve this objective including but not limited to conditions which require:
a. groundwater and surface water monitoring related to municipal drinking water supplies;
b. assessment of demand management: water needs assessment (review of permitted maximum takings) and water efficiency measures;
c. a phased approach to assess impacts;
d. information sharing with the MECP, County, Municipalities and conservation authorities including a condition of approval for permit holders to provide Municipalities and conservation authorities technical reports and monitoring data gathered pursuant to a condition of the PTTW (as per bullet a.) above);
e. measures to increase the optimization of the municipal water supply system where appropriate; and
f. drought management planning for drought sensitive wells//systems.
The MECP shall circulate Environmental Registry notices to the County, Municipalities and GRCA and have due regard for comments from the GRCA, County and Municipalities regarding new or revised applications for PTTW and Drinking Water Works Permits and new or revised conditions of approvals related thereto.
Recognizing the results of the Tier 3 Study demonstrate that new municipal water supplies are required to meet planned growth, the MECP shall prioritize preconsultation, engagement and information sharing with the County, where appropriate, any relevant Municipalities and the GRCA for new or expanded municipal takings that could improve the assigned risk level for the Centre Wellington WHPA-Q. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-22.3 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the MNRF, in consultation with the MECP, County, Municipalities, conservation authorities and licensees, shall consider when issuing new ARA licenses, and amendments to existing sites proposing to lower the depth of extraction from above to below the water table, the results and recommendations of the Tier 3 Study, water supply requirements for planned growth and prolonged drought outlined in Water Supply Master Plans and available data, reports and/or recommendations from monitoring programs established pursuant to policies in the County of Wellington Chapter of the Grand River Source Protection Plan, as part of the process under the ARA for approval of ARA licences, licence conditions and site plans based on the technical reports and information required under the ARA. To achieve this and ensure that the quantity of Municipal Water Supply will not be adversely impacted, MNRF shall consider establishing approval conditions in ARA licenses and site plans including but not limited to:
a. operational controls;
b. measures that ensure that any below water extraction is protective of municipal drinking water supplies, including measures that restrict and/or
limit extraction activities below the water table; and
c. groundwater and surface water monitoring related to municipal drinking water supplies. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-22.7 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the County in consultation with the Municipalities, shall take into consideration water quantity constraints identified through the Tier 3 Study when allocating projected growth as part of a municipal comprehensive review. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-22.8 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the County in consultation with the Municipalities, shall only approve municipally serviced settlement area expansions within a WHPA-Q as part of a municipal comprehensive review or as otherwise provided by the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, where the following has been demonstrated: through the use of the Tier 3 Model or other equivalent means, and that the expansion will not adversely impact the aquifer’s ability to meet the municipal water supply requirements for current and planned service capacity. The required data-gathering and analysis to demonstrate no adverse impact should be completed through collaboration and coordination among the County, the affected Municipality(ies), the GRCA, Province and / or private developers. This policy does not apply to settlement area expansions with water supply sources outside of the WHPA-Q.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-22.9 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the County shall amend its Official Plan to establish policies, applicable to any New development that requires or could require water taking in excess of 50,000 litres per day for groundwater taking within a WHPA-Q. The County Official Plan policies shall require that it be demonstrated that such development will not adversely impact the Municipal Supply based on appropriate study including consideration of the Tier 3 Study results based on planned growth and prolonged drought conditions.
The Planning Approval Authority shall use its discretion to implement the requirements of this policy to the extent feasible and practicable given the specific circumstances of the proposed water taking.
The following requirements shall be added to the County Official Plan in order to provide further clarification to County Official Plan policy 4.9.5.4 (“Drinking Water Threat Disclosure Reports”) with respect to applications under the Planning Act for development, redevelopment and site alteration within a WHPA-Q:
a. that a Drinking Water Threat Disclosure Report be added to the list of studies in the Official Plan that may be required for a complete application;
b. that a Drinking Water Threat Disclosure Report and Hydrogeological Impact Assessment shall be a required component of a complete application under the Planning Act to be located within a WHPA-Q (i.e. official plan amendment, subdivision, condominium, rezoning or consent) where the development that is the subject of the application requires or could require water taking in excess of 50,000 litres per day; and
c. that a Drinking Water Threat Disclosure Report and Hydrogeological Impact Assessment shall be required for any development, which requires site plan approval pursuant to section 41 of the Planning Act, and which is located on lands within a WHPA-Q, where the development that is the subject of the application requires or could require water taking in excess of 50,000 litres per day. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-23.1 |
To ensure that any Recharge Reducing Activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the MECP shall review and amend, if necessary, Environmental Compliance Approvals for Stormwater Management Facilities and / or Sewage Works to incorporate conditions, where appropriate, to address groundwater recharge considerations. Where appropriate and feasible, the MECP shall encourage the implementation of measures for the maintenance of groundwater recharge functions including LID, minimizing impervious surfaces and lot level infiltration. Where appropriate and feasible, the MECP shall consider establishing approval conditions in the Environmental Compliance Approval to ensure the proper functioning of groundwater recharge measures including, but not limited to, conditions requiring or related to operations, inspection and maintenance of the Stormwater Management Facilities and / or Sewage Works, groundwater or surface water monitoring related to groundwater recharge, and documentation including manuals and maintenance records.
For Stormwater Management Facilities and / or Sewage Works located within a WHPA-Q in a Chloride, Sodium or Nitrate ICA, the MECP shall consider conditions that address how recharge will be maintained and water quality will be protected from application and storage of winter maintenance materials including Salt. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-23.2 |
To ensure that any Recharge Reducing Activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the MECP should, during any pre-submission consultation for Environmental Compliance Approvals for Stormwater Management Facilities and / or Sewage Works, encourage design and implementation measures for the maintenance of groundwater recharge functions including but not limited to LID, minimizing impervious surfaces and lot level infiltration.
The MECP shall issue Environmental Compliance Approvals for Stormwater Management Facilities and / or Sewage Works that, where appropriate, incorporate conditions that address groundwater recharge considerations. In addition, the MECP, where appropriate, shall consider incorporating conditions in the Environmental Compliance Approvals to address the proper functioning of groundwater recharge measures including, but not limited to, conditions requiring or related to operations, inspection and maintenance of the Stormwater Management Facilities and / or Sewage Works, groundwater or surface water monitoring related to groundwater recharge, and documentation including manuals and maintenance records.
For Stormwater Management Facilities and / or Sewage Works located within the WHPA-Q in a Chloride, Sodium or Nitrate ICA, the MECP shall consider conditions that require best management practices that address how recharge will be maintained and water quality will be protected from application and storage of winter maintenance materials including Salt. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-23.3 |
To ensure that any Recharge Reducing Activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the County, as the Planning Approval Authority, in consultation with the Municipalities, shall only approve settlement area expansions within a WHPA-Q as part of a municipal comprehensive review or as otherwise provided by the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, where it can be adequately demonstrated that recharge functions can be maintained or improved on lands designated Significant Groundwater Recharge Areas within a WHPA-Q. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-23.4 |
To ensure that any Recharge Reducing Activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the Planning Approval Authorities, within the WHPA-Q shall require that all site plan applications under the Planning Act, to facilitate New development not meeting the Major Development definition for new residential, commercial, industrial and institutional uses, implement best management practices such as LID with the goal to maintain predevelopment recharge. This shall include consideration of how recharge will be maintained and water quality will be protected such as from the application and storage of winter maintenance materials including Salt. Planning Approval Authorities shall also encourage implementation of best management practices for site plan applications related to agricultural uses, agriculture-related uses, or on-farm diversified uses provided that such measures are recognized to be voluntary, where the total impervious surface does not exceed 10 per cent of the lot. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-23.5 |
To ensure that any Recharge Reducing Activity never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the Planning Approval Authority shall require that all site plan, subdivision and vacant land condominium applications to facilitate Major Development for new residential, commercial, industrial and institutional uses provide a water balance assessment for the proposed development which addresses each of the following requirements:
a. maintain pre-development recharge to the greatest extent feasible through best management practices such as LID, minimizing impervious surfaces, and lot level infiltration;
b. where pre-development recharge cannot be maintained on site, implement and maximize off-site recharge enhancement (within the same WHPA-Q) to compensate for any predicted loss of recharge from the development; and
c. within a WHPA-Q in a Chloride, Sodium or Nitrate ICA, the water balance assessment must consider water quality when recommending best management practices and address how recharge will be maintained and water quality will be protected including consideration of how water quality will be protected from application and storage of winter maintenance materials including Salt.
The Planning Approval Authority shall use its discretion to implement the requirements of this policy to the extent feasible and practicable given the nature of the proposed development, specific circumstances of a site and off-site recharge opportunities.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-3.3 |
To ensure Existing or New onsite sewage systems with a design flow of greater than 10,000 Litres per day and regulated under the Ontario Water Resources Act cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the MECP shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, ensure that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The terms and conditions may include, as appropriate, requirements for the proponent/applicant to undertake mandatory monitoring of groundwater impacts, contingencies in the event that drinking water quality is adversely affected, regular and ongoing compliance monitoring, mandatory system inspections at least every five (5) years, and upgrading of these onsite sewage systems to current standards, if necessary.
In addition, the terms and conditions may include the proponent/applicant to provide annual reporting to the Source Protection Authority and Municipality of any monitoring and inspection programs required and their results. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-3.4 |
To ensure the establishment of Future sewage treatment plants with effluent and/or bypass discharge or Future sewage treatment plants with sewage storage tanks never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where these activities would be a significant drinking water threat, the MECP shall prohibit these activities within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process. This policy does not apply to the expansion, modification, optimization, re-rating, operation, maintenance or replacement of Existing sewage treatment plants. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-3.5 |
To ensure Existing or Future sanitary sewers and related pipes, industrial effluent discharge, treatment or holding tanks and/or Existing sewage treatment plants cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where these activities are, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, within a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or IPZ-1 or Nitrate or Chloride ICA, the MECP shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will ensure that these activities cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat.
The terms and conditions may include requirements for regular maintenance, monitoring and inspections conducted by the proponent.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-3.6 |
To ensure Future industrial effluent discharge to surface water or combined sewer discharge from a stormwater outlet never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat, within an IPZ1, the MECP shall prohibit this activity within the Environmental Compliance Approvals process.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-3.7 |
To ensure an Existing or Future Stormwater Management Facility that discharges stormwater ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the MECP shall review and, if necessary, amend Environmental Compliance Approvals to incorporate terms and conditions that, when implemented, will ensure that this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
The terms and conditions may include requirements for regular maintenance, monitoring and inspections conducted by the proponent. For Stormwater Management Facilities located within the WHPA-Q in a Chloride, Sodium or Nitrate ICA, the MECP shall consider conditions which require best management practices to protect water quality, and which address how recharge will be maintained and water quality will be protected including consideration of how water quality will be protected from application and storage of winter maintenance materials including Salt. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-4.3 |
To ensure the Existing or Future application of agricultural source material to land with an existing, or requiring, a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), the OMAFRA shall review and, if necessary, amend the Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy to ensure that such Plan/Strategy incorporates measures and/or terms and conditions deemed necessary to ensure this activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-5.3 |
The OMAFRA shall review and, if necessary, amend the Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy to ensure that such Plan/Strategy incorporates measures and/or terms and conditions deemed necessary to ensure that the storage of agricultural source material ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat for:
a. any Existing activity on lands phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-A or WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10), or IPZ-1; or
b. any Future activity on lands phased-in under the Nutrient Management Act within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10).
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-6.1 |
The OMAFRA or the MECP, as applicable, shall revoke or not approve any Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or any Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the EPA, to ensure the Existing and or Future application of non-agricultural source material to land ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-A or IPZ-1. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-6.2 |
The OMAFRA, or MECP, as applicable, shall review and, if necessary, amend the Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or an Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the EPA, to ensure that such Plans/Compliance Approvals incorporate measures and/or terms and conditions deemed necessary to ensure the Existing application of non-agricultural source material to land ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) and/or a Nitrate ICA outside of a WHPA-A. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-7.1 |
The OMAFRA, or MECP, as applicable, shall review and, if necessary, amend the Non-Agricultural Source Material (NASM) Plan in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act, or an Environmental Compliance Approval in accordance with the EPA to ensure that such Plans/Compliance Approvals incorporate measures and/or terms and conditions deemed necessary to ensure the handling and storage of non-agricultural source material cease to be or never become a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, for:
a. any Existing activity; or
b. any Future activity on lands within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10) or a Nitrate ICA but outside of a WHPA-A.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-MC-8.2 |
The OMAFRA shall review and, if necessary, amend the Nutrient Management Plan/Strategy to ensure that such Plan/Strategy incorporates measures and/or terms and conditions deemed necessary to ensure the Existing or Future application of commercial fertilizer to land with an existing or requiring a Nutrient Management Plan or Strategy in accordance with the Nutrient Management Act ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat within a WHPA-B with a vulnerability score equal to ten (10). |
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-1.17 |
To address Conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats, the MECP should prioritize abatement activities on Conditions Sites located within the WHPA-A, WHPA-B, and ICAs.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-1.18 |
To address conditions resulting from past activities that are significant drinking water threats the MECP and the County and/or Municipality(ies):
a. Shall meet at a minimum frequency of once a calendar year for the purpose of mutually sharing information on Condition sites;
b. Should mutually share information related, as appropriate, to technical investigations or remediation, technical data, actions taken by MECP or by the County and/or Municipality(ies), inspections, other relevant information; and
c. Should develop an Information-Sharing Process document including requirements, if any, for meeting agendas, participants, the nature and format for the types of information to be mutually shared, and the Information-Sharing Process document should be developed within six months from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
d. Should mutually share available documentation, as appropriate, for potential significant drinking water treats / Condition sites.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Existing, Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-1.19 |
To ensure spill prevention plans, contingency plans, and emergency response plans are updated for the purpose of protecting municipal drinking water sources with respect to spills that occur within a WHPA or IPZ along highways, or railway lines:
a. The County and/or Municipality is requested to incorporate the location of WHPAs and IPZs into their emergency response plans in order to protect municipal drinking water sources when a spill occurs along highways or rail lines; and
b. The MECP is requested to provide mapping of the identified vulnerable areas to assist the Spills Action Centre in responding to reported spills along transportation corridors.
|
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-1.20 |
To achieve the intent of the CWA, significant drinking water threats identified in the vicinity of a transport pathway shall be managed to reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources such that they do not become a significant threat and that a pathway reduces the risk to the source water of a municipal water supply. The County and/or Municipality are requested to support ongoing programs which encourage the decommissioning of abandoned wells as per O. Reg. 903 within all WHPA- A and IPZ-1 areas where there is or would be a significant drinking water threat. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-1.22 |
The OMAFRA, and other creators/issuers of Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act, are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into such Prescribed Instruments to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. |
Grand River |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-1.7 |
The MECP and other provincial ministries shall consider providing continued funding and support to protect existing and future drinking water sources and address significant drinking water threats under the Ontario Drinking Water Stewardship Program and Rural Water Quality Program. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-1.8 |
To reduce the risks to drinking water from an Existing activity, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat, the GRCA, in consultation with the County, will deliver available cost share incentive programs as long as the GRCA has such programs and outreach staff available, and work with affected land owners to implement best management practices for the following activities:
The application of agricultural source material to land;
The storage of agricultural source material; and,
The use of land as livestock grazing or pasturing land, an outdoor confinement area or a farm-animal yard.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-12.4 |
To ensure any Existing or Future application of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, and to minimize the impacts from this activity through Existing or Future transport pathways within a WHPA-A and WHPA-B where the vulnerability score is equal to ten (10), or within a Chloride ICA, the MECP should prioritize inspections and abatement activities related to well maintenance and abandonment pursuant to Ontario Regulation 903, Ontario Water Resources Act, 1990. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-12.6 |
To ensure any Existing or Future application of road Salt ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry of Transportation should review and, if necessary, revise or issue new Salt Management Plans for the application of Salt on roadways.
The Salt Management Plan should include, as a minimum, measures to ensure application rate, timing and location to reduce the potential for Salt-related surface water run-off and groundwater infiltration and meet the objectives of Environment Canada's Code of Practice for Environmental Management of Road Salts including the Salt vulnerable area mapping to include areas where significant threats can occur.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-20.1 |
To reduce the risks to municipal drinking water sources from the establishment and operation of a liquid hydrocarbon pipeline within the meaning of O. Reg. 210/01 under the Technical Safety and Standards Act or that is subject to the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat, the Canada Energy Regulator, Ontario Energy Board, and the pipeline proponent are encouraged to provide the Source Protection Authority and the Municipality the location of any Future proposed pipeline within the Municipality and/or Source Protection Area.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-21.3 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking and/or any Recharge Reducing Activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats as prescribed by the CWA, the MECP should mutually share information with the GRCA, the Municipalities and the County, to collaboratively manage water resources within the Centre Wellington WHPA-Q. This may include, but is not limited to, the sharing of data, use, and/or management of the Tier 3 Model; and/or discussion related to Consumptive Water Takings, areas of recharge reduction and/or actions taken by the parties.
|
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-21.5 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking and/or Recharge Reducing Activities cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats, where these activities are or would be significant drinking water threats as prescribed by the CWA, the MECP should consider providing ongoing funding to the GRCA and the Municipalities to maintain and update the following:
a. Tier 3 Models;
b. Tier 3 climate change assessment models;
c. updates to Tier 3 Study; and
d. long-term monitoring programs of groundwater and surface water systems to assess potential impacts from Consumptive Water Takings and / or Recharge Reducing Activities. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-22.11 |
To ensure that any Consumptive Water Taking ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the MNRF should continue to integrate source protection water quantity technical work into the aggregate policy framework and provincial standards. The MNRF should also enhance engagement with other water managers (e.g., Municipalities, conservation authorities, and the MECP in the ARA licensing process. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-22.12 |
To ensure that any consumptive water taking ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat where this activity is or would be a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the Clean Water Act, 2006, the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks and / or the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry, should ensure source protection is included as a risk factor of sites with Permits to Take Water (PTTW) and / or Aggregate Resources Act, 1990 Licenses in WHPA-Q Areas in the ministry local office riskbased inspection planning process and compliance response planning. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WC-NB-23.7 |
To ensure that any Recharge Reducing Activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat, where this activity is a significant drinking water threat as prescribed by the CWA, the MECP should ensure source protection is included as a risk factor of sites with Stormwater Management Facilities and / or Sewage Works in WHPA-Q Areas in the ministry local office risk-based inspection planning process and compliance response planning. |
Grand River |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WDS1 |
The Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall not issue any Environmental Compliance Approvals for a future waste disposal site within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act where the threat from the establishment, operation or maintenance of such a site could be significant.
For Environmental Compliance Approvals that exist in the areas where the threat could be significant for waste disposal sites within the meaning of Part V of the Environmental Protection Act, the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change shall review their terms within three years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect and amend the Approval as necessary to ensure that the terms of each Approval adequately addresses the threats to source water. The Director, as defined in the Environmental Protection Act or its Regulations, may determine another implementation date based on a prioritized review of Environmental Compliance Approvals that govern significant drinking water threat activities.
This policy applies for the named activities and threat subcategories in the following vulnerable areas:
Application of hauled sewage to land:
Callander IPZ-1, IPZ-2, and Issue Contributing Area (ICA only if
related to a circumstance containing phosphorus);
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
North Bay IPZ-1;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Discharges from
the storage and treatment of tailings from mines:
Callander IPZ-1 and Issue Contributing Area (ICA only if related to
a circumstance containing phosphorus);
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Landfarming of petroleum refining waste AND landfilling (hazardous waste)
AND storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial waste:
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Landfilling
(municipal waste) AND landfilling (solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial):
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A, B and C;
Powassan WHPA-A, B1/B2/B4 and C1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Liquid industrial waste injection into a well:
Mattawa WHPA-A, B and C; and
Powassan WHPA-A, B1/B2/B4 and C1. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Existing, Existing, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WDS2 |
When the Source Protection Plan takes effect, the Municipality shall prohibit the future use of land as a landfill, mine tailings pond, an area designated to be injected with liquid industrial waste, or an area for landfarming of petroleum refining waste where the threat from the activity would be significant. An official plan and zoning by-law in effect for the vulnerable areas shall be reviewed and amended, as necessary, as required under Section 26 of the Planning Act to implement this policy. This policy applies to the named activities and threat subcategories in the following vulnerable areas:
Storage of tailings from mines:
Callander IPZ-1 and Issue Contributing Area (ICA only if related to a circumstance containing phosphorus);
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1).
Landfarming of petroleum refining waste AND landfilling (hazardous waste)
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1).
Landfilling (municipal waste) AND landfilling (solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial):
Callander IPZ-1;
Mattawa WHPA-A, B and C;
Powassan WHPA-A, B1/B2/B4 and
C1; and
South River IPZ-1 with the exception of lands in Laurier Township (which are subject to LAU1). An area where liquid industrial waste is injected into a well:
Mattawa WHPA-A, B and C; and
Powassan WHPA-A, B1/B2/B4 and C1. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WDS3 |
Where there could be a threat from the existing or future storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste, hazardous waste as defined in (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of regulation 374 of the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), the Municipality shall plan and deliver an Education and Outreach program designed to ensure those involved in such activities are aware of the risks posed to source water, how to reduce those, and how to recognize and respond to a spill. The program shall be delivered within two years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect and shall be made available and updated as necessary on an ongoing basis as is deemed appropriate by the Municipality.
The program shall be delivered to all persons that could be engaged in the activity of storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste, waste as defined in (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of regulation 374 of the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) and PCBs where the threats could be significant.
This policy applies for the named activities and threat subcategories in the following vulnerable areas:
Storage of PCBs:
Mattawa WHPA-A and B; and
Powassan WHPA-A and B1.
Storage of hazardous waste or liquid industrial
waste:
Callander IPZ-1
Mattawa WHPA-A and B;
Powassan WHPA-A and B1; and
South River IPZ-1.
Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste (in Part V of the Environmental Protection Act):
Mattawa WHPA-A and B; and
Powassan WHPA-A and B1.
Additionally the program may be more broadly released to a whole Municipality or any part of the Source Protection Area, at the discretion of a municipal council. |
North Bay-Mattawa |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WL-1 |
In accordance with Section 22(7) of the Clean Water Act, the Ministry of Transportation, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Environment as well as in consultation with the Source Protection Authorities (SPAs), should design a sign to the appropriate Provincial standards, to identify the locations of Intake Protection Zones. The Ministry of Transportation should manufacture, install and maintain the signs along Provincial Highways within an Intake Protection Zone with a vulnerability score of 8 or higher. This policy will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan where it applies to the Ministry of Transportation.
For signs on the municipal roads, Niagara Region, in cooperation with the City of Welland will be responsible for the purchase, installation and maintenance of appropriate signs, designed by the Province in collaboration with the Source Protection Authority.
This policy, as it applies to municipal arterial roads will be implemented as part of an overall education and outreach plan by Niagara Region. This policy should be implemented within two years from the date the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Non-specific |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WL-2 |
Niagara Region, and the municipalities of Port Colborne, Welland and Thorold, shall update their Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) to include the following:
Maps that show the locations of the Welland Water Treatment Plant intake and its associated IPZ-3 and IPZ-1.
An up-to-date communications protocol showing the structure of command of the various agencies that would be contacted.
The ERPs shall be updated within two years from the time the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WL-3 |
St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC), Ontario Ministry of Environment (MOE) Spills Action Centre (SAC), and Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) are requested to update their Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) to include the following where applicable:
Maps that show the locations of the Welland Water Treatment Plant intake and its associated IPZ-3 and IPZ-1.
An up-to-date communications protocol showing the structure of command of the various agencies that would be contacted.
As it relates to railway corridors, Transport Canada is requested to ensure Emergency Response Plans under their jurisdiction are updated accordingly.
The ERP shall be updated within two years from the time the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WL-4 |
The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC) is requested to implement the following Risk Management Measures to address the potential impacts of a fuel spill on the raw water supply for the Welland Water Treatment Plant:
- Require that persons handling fuel follow a protocol that uses best management practices to prevent spills from occurring.
- Ensure that spill containment booms can be readily deployed in the event of a fuel spill.
The risk management measures should be updated within two years from the time the Source Protection Plan comes into effect. |
Niagara Peninsula |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WQ1EF-SA |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall develop and implement an action plan, including actions to be taken and an implementation schedule, to ensure that water takings from the municipal wells and aquifer recharge reduction cease to be significant drinking water threats.
The action plan may include:
Water conservation and water efficiency measures
Developing operational optimization scenarios and procedures, such as that shown in the Risk Management Measures Evaluation Report; the scenario in this report shows that the significant risk identified at the Linden well in Local Area A during periods of higher demand and drought conditions can be reduced; the same methodology can be used to help determine how the water supply can be sustained under different stresses and constraints
Establishing an aquifer level ""trigger ; to determine when to adjust pumping rates and use alternate operating strategies; this would include completing the instrumentation of all water supply wells and linking them to the operators information system (scada)
Increasing storage to help maintain the sustainability of the system during periods of peak demand
Reviewing the City's annual water main leak detection program to determine if it would be beneficial to consider the water quantity risk in the Valley system as a criterion for selecting areas for leak detection and water main repair
Reviewing options to maximize water conservation and maintenance of aquifer recharge
Developing an education and outreach program to inform property owners about actions that can be taken to reduce water consumption and maintain aquifer recharge (e.g downspout disconnection, low flow toilets, xeriscaping). The Municipality could create an incentive program (such as rebates for example) to encourage these best management practices.
Updating the Tier 3 water budget model to refine the water efficiency and/or conservation action plan as the City evaluates its effectiveness.
This policy will come into effect within three years of the source protection plan taking effect.
Monitoring policy M19 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WQ2EF-LUP |
The City of Greater Sudbury shall ensure that water takings and recharge reduction cease to be or do not become significant threats by only permitting Official Plan settlement boundary expansions where a detailed hydrogeological assessment of the aquifer, including but not limited to, an update of the current Tier Three Water Budget Model. The assessment must demonstrate that an increased taking or increased settlement areas will not adversely impact the aquifer's ability to meet municipal and other water supply requirements. Any new information, such as updated population forecasts, results of the groundwater monitoring program or infrastructure upgrades shall be taken into consideration.
Monitoring policy M20 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WQ3EF-PI |
The Ministry of the Environment shall ensure that groundwater Permit to Take Water Approvals that result in a net loss to the aquifer include appropriate terms and conditions to demonstrate that an increased taking will not adversely impact the aquifer's ability to meet municipal and other water supply requirements and demonstrate that future water takings do not become significant threats.
This policy exempts temporary permits to take water. This policy does not apply to the renewal of municipal permits to take water.
Monitoring policy M1 applies. |
Nickel District |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WST-1 |
The establishment, operation, or maintenance of a site used by the generator to store hazardous or liquid industrial waste which is not included in the small quantity exemption in Ontario Regulation 347 under the Environmental Protection Act, is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is, or would be, significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-7: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans, are prohibited until such time as a risk management plan is approved by the Risk Management Official, immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WST-2 |
The municipality shall deliver education and outreach materials and programs where the storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid or industrial waste is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat targeted towards ensuring that facilities that generate small quantities of waste manage the storage of these wastes so that they cease to be, or do not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future).
Where appropriate education and outreach materials prepared by the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks are available, the municipality shall deliver those materials.
Timeline:
T-10: Education and outreach (materials, programs, etc.) shall be developed and implemented within 2 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future & Existing |
2 |
False |
|
WST-3 |
1) The application of untreated septage to land shall be prohibited where the activity would be a significant drinking water threat in the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (future).
2) The application of untreated septage to land may continue only until the expiry of the current approval, after which time it shall be considered a future activity in any of the following areas:
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 8) (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Nitrates or Pathogens (existing).
Timelines:
T-2: Prescribed Instruments (existing), where prohibited, shall not be renewed when the current Prescribed Instrument expires, and the significant threat activity to which the Prescribed Instrument pertains, shall cease no later than 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WST-4 |
1) Waste disposal sites (future) shall be prohibited where the storage, generation or management of waste would be a significant drinking water threat, where these activities include:
a) Storage, treatment, and discharge of tailings from mines;
b) Landfarming of petroleum refining waste;
c) Landfilling (hazardous waste);
d) Landfilling (municipal waste);
e) Landfilling (solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste);
f) Liquid industrial waste injection into a well;
g) Storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste (large facilities such as landfills and transfer stations); and
h) Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste (large facilities such as landfills and transfer stations).
2) Where a waste disposal site (existing) is in an area where the storage, generation or management of waste is a significant drinking water threat, the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the activity shall be reviewed to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be a significant drinking water threat, where waste disposal sites include:
a) Storage, treatment, and discharge of tailings from mines;
b) Landfarming of petroleum refining waste;
c) Landfilling (hazardous waste);
d) Landfilling (municipal waste);
e) Landfilling (solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste);
f) Liquid industrial waste injection into a well;
g) Storage of hazardous liquid industrial waste (at large facilities such as landfills and transfer stations); and
h) Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste (at large facilities such as landfills and transfer stations).
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WST-5 |
The use of land for waste disposal (future) shall be prohibited where the storage or generation of waste would be a significant drinking water threat at the following types of waste disposal sites:
a) Storage, treatment, and discharge of tailings from mines;
b) Landfarming of petroleum refining waste;
c) Landfilling (hazardous waste);
d) Landfilling (municipal waste);
e) Landfilling (solid non-hazardous industrial or commercial waste);
f) Liquid industrial waste injection into a well;
g) Storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste (at large facilities such as landfills and transfer stations);
h) Storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t) or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste
(at large facilities such as landfills and transfer stations). |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |
|
WST-6 |
Where an approval under the Environmental Protection Act is not required, the establishment, operation or maintenance of a waste disposal site, including for the storage of PCB waste where it is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, will require the following actions to be taken:
1) The storage of PCB waste is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (future).
2) The storage of PCB waste is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing).
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
WST-7 |
Where a temporary waste destruction unit for PCBs is required in an area where the storage of PCB waste is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat, the Environmental Compliance Approval that governs the activity shall be reviewed or established to ensure appropriate terms and conditions are included so that the activity ceases to be, or does not become, a significant drinking water threat in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing, future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing, future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 10) (existing, future).
Timelines:
T-1: Prescribed Instruments (existing) shall be reviewed (and amended, as necessary) within 3 years of the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect, or such other date as the Director determines.
T-3: The relevant Ministry shall comply with the Prescribed Instrument policy (future) immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect. |
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto |
Significant |
Existing, Future |
2 |
False |
|
Y-1 |
Y-1(1): Permit to Take Water Policies in WHPA-Q1 with Significant Water Quantity Threats
Within the Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 where a water taking is or would be a significant water quantity threat, the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change shall ensure each water taking threat ceases to be, or does not become significant, through actions the Director considers appropriate on a case by case basis, such as:
1) Reviewing all existing Permits to Take Water, located within WHPA-Q1 with a significant risk level, in consultation with other Ministries (as required), the affected municipality, relevant conservation authorities, and permit holders, and amend the permits where necessary to ensure that:
a) municipal water supply requirements for the allocated and planned quantity (per the current approved population and employment projections of the most recent Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe) will be met on a sustainable basis; and
b) the hydrological integrity of municipal wells in the vulnerable areas will be maintained [NOTE: Policy Y-1(1)1) Reviewing all existing Permits to Take Water is not applicable to the Trent Source Protection Plan. Existing permits to take water are not significant drinking water threat as WHPA Q1 in TCC region is of a moderate risk level, and therefore references to existing water takings or significant risk levels do not apply within the WHPA Q1 in TCC region. This policy was included to retain consistency with the CTC Source Protection Plan policies and reduce cross boundary issues.]
2) Issuing Permits to Take Water for new or increased takings, located within WHPA-Q1 with moderate risk levels, only if it can be satisfactorily demonstrated, using the findings of the most recently approved Tier 3 Water Budget Model and other available data, where appropriate, that the taking:
a) can be maintained on a sustainable basis;
b) will not affect the ability of the aquifer to meet the municipal water supply requirements for the current and planned service capacity; and
c) will ensure the hydrological integrity of municipal wells will be maintained.
Y-1(2): Planning Policies in WHPA-Q1 with Significant Water Quantity Threats
Within the Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 where a water taking is or would be a significant water quantity threat, the relevant Planning Approval Authority shall ensure water taking does not become a significant drinking
water threat by:
1) Only permitting new development if the new development does not require a new or amended Permit to Take Water;
2) Only providing final approval for new development that requires a new or amended Permit to Take Water once the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change has determined that the proposed taking will not become a significant water quantity threat;
3) Only approving settlement area expansions within WHPA-Q1 as part of a municipal comprehensive review where the applicable provincial planning criteria have been met and the following has been demonstrated:
a) the aquifer has sufficient capacity to sustainably provide municipal water services to the expanded settlement area;
b) the expansion will not adversely impact the aquifers ability to meet the municipal water supply requirements for current and planned service capacity, for other permitted takings, or for wastewater receiving bodies; and
c) the hydrological integrity of municipal wells will be maintained.
Y-1(3): The municipality or planning authority shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies for the preceding calendar year, and make that report available to the applicable Municipalities and the Source Protection Authority.
Y-1(4): Growth Management/Planning Ministries to Review Growth in WHPA-Q1 with Significant Water Quantity Threats
Within a Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 identified as having significant water quantity threats, the Provincial Ministries specified below should undertake the following to ensure the provision and distribution of water supply for municipal population and employment growth forecasts does not create a new, or increase an existing, significant water quantity threat:
1) The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing in consultation with the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change and any affected municipalities should use the Tier 3 Water Budget information and other available data to ensure that municipal Official Plan growth forecasts and distributions will not result in creating or worsening a significant water quantity threat, given water quantity constraints identified in Tier 3 Water Budget model areas; and
2) The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing should take into consideration water quantity constraints identified through Tier 3 Water Budgets, and other available data, during its review of the population forecasts contained in the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, in consultation with relevant municipalities. [NOTE: Policy Y-1(4) is not applicable to the Trent Source Protection Plan as WHPA Q1 in TCC region is of a moderate risk level, and therefore references to Growth Management Plans for significant risk levels do not apply with the WHPA Q1 in TCC region. This policy was simply included to retain consistency with the CTC Source Protection Plan policies and reduce cross boundary issues.]
Y-1(5): The ministry shall prepare, by February 1 each year, an annual summary of the actions it has taken to achieve the outcomes of the source protection plan policies for the preceding calendar year, and make that report available to the applicable Source Protection Authority. Reporting shall include information related to the effectiveness of the policies in ensuring a threat ceases to be, or does not become significant, and any actions required to respond to a drinking water threat during the reporting period. [NOTE: Policy Y-1(5) is not applicable as a monitoring policy to policy Y-1(4) in the Trent Source Protection Plan as policy Y-1(4) is only applicable to significant drinking water threats and the WHPA Q1 in TCC region is of a moderate risk level. This policy is not applicable at this time and was included to retain consistency with the CTC Source Protection Plan policies and reduce cross boundary issues.]
Y-1(6): Municipal Water Conservation Plans
Municipalities responsible for the production, treatment, and storage of water, who have a municipal well and/or whose residents are served by a municipal water supply within the Tier 3 Water Budget WHPA-Q1 shall develop and/or update Water Conservation Plans to ensure they are an effective tool to support sustainable water quantity by reducing consumption and therefore the demand for water.
Y-1(7): Tier 3 Model Updates
The MOECC should adopt and fund a Tier 3 Water Budget Model in a WHPAQ1 identified as having a moderate or significant risk level and undertake the following to ensure it is maintained as the primary model to review existing and future Permits to Take Water, to allow municipalities and other provincial ministries (i.e., MMA and Ministry of Infrastructure) to evaluate growth projections and distributions, and to facilitate the review of planning applications by municipalities, where necessary, to ensure that these activities cease to be, or do not become, significant drinking water threats:
1) Through the PTTW program, require municipal takers in WHPA-Q1 to monitor water quantity and supply data on a regular basis to assist in the upkeep of the model to determine any increase or reduction in significant water quantity threats;
2) Use the model with the most up-to-date data as an analysis and decision making tool; and
3) When necessary, contribute to funding for new continuous flow gauging stations in key surface water features and enhance conservation authorities existing Hydrometric Network in WHPA-Q1 to monitor long term trends in surface water quantity, study impacts of urbanization and climate change on aquifer recharge, and facilitate calibration of the model
[NOTE: The references to significant risk level, exiting takings, and cease to be in Policy Y-1(7)(1) does not apply in the Trent SPP, and the policy is only applicable for the
WHPA Q1 with a moderate risk level, future takings. Policy Y-1(7) was included to retain consistency with the CTC Source Protection Plan policies and reduce cross
boundary issues.]
|
Crowe Valley, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future & Existing, Future, Future, Future, Future, Future |
2 |
False |
|
Z-1 |
Recharge Policy
For applications under the Planning Act within the Tier 3 Water Budget
WHPA-Q2 identified as having significant water quantity threats, the
relevant Planning Approval Authority shall ensure recharge reduction does
not become a significant drinking water threat by:
1) Requiring new development for lands zoned Low Density Residential
(excluding subdivisions) or zoned Agricultural to implement best
management practices such as Low Impact Development (LID) with the goal
to maintain predevelopment recharge.
2) Requiring that all site plan (excluding an application for one single family
dwelling) and subdivision applications for new residential, commercial,
industrial and institutional uses provide a water balance assessment for the
proposed development to the satisfaction of the Planning Approval
Authority which addresses each of the following requirements:
a) maintain pre-development recharge to the greatest extent
feasible through best management practices such as LID,
minimizing impervious surfaces, and lot level infiltration;
b) where pre-development recharge cannot be maintained on site,
implement and maximize off-site recharge enhancement (within
the same WHPA-Q2) to compensate for any predicted loss of
recharge from the development; and
3) Only approving settlement area expansions as part of a municipal
comprehensive review where it has been demonstrated that recharge
functions will be maintained on lands designated Significant Groundwater
Recharge Areas within WHPA-Q2.
4) Amending municipal planning documents to reference most current
Assessment Reports in regards to the Significant Groundwater Recharge
Areas within WHPA-Q2. |
Crowe Valley, Kawartha-Haliburton, Lower Trent, Otonabee-Peterborough |
Significant |
Future |
2 |
False |