SWP - Policy Interface
Home
Policies
Full Text Policies
Reports/Stats
Home
Policy Edit
Previous Policy
Policy
Next Policy
Policy Id:
SPR/SPA:
Risk:
R.8.1, A.8.1, C.8.1
Ausable Bayfield, Maitland Valley
Significant
Implementing Body
Legal Effect
Policy Tool
Threat Type
Status
Comment
Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Bluewater Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Central Huron Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Huron East Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Huron-Kinloss Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Minto Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Morris-Turnberry Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
North Huron Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
North Perth Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Ashfield-Colborne-Wawanosh Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Bluewater Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Central Huron Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Huron East Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Huron-Kinloss Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Minto Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Morris-Turnberry Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
North Huron Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
North Perth Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Policy Text:
Within a wellhead protection area where the vulnerability score is 10 any existing and future road salt handling, storage or application where it is a significant drinking water threat is designated for the purpose of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act, and requires a Risk Management Plan. This includes, for example, but is not limited to the following (for full circumstance details refer to the MOE Tables of Circumstances):
a) application of road salt where the impervious surface is greater than 80%
b) storage of road salt where the vulnerability score is 10 and the quantity stored is greater than 5,000 tonnes.
The Risk Management Official shall negotiate or establish a Risk Management Plan with the person engaged in the designated threat activity within three years of the Plan coming into effect. The RMP is to contain, at a minimum, structural or management alterations (if any) which when implemented will ensure that existing operations continue to function in a manner which minimizes the risk to sources of municipal drinking water. Risk Management Plans are expected to be based on existing programs such as ""Smart About Salt ; for commercial properties and the ""Synthesis of Best Management Practices ; for municipal properties.
Monitoring Text:
Policy P.12.10 – Monitoring Policy for Policies where a Municipality or Principal Authority is named as an Implementing Body
By February 01, 2016, and then thereafter annually by February 01, where a policy of this plan prescribes that a municipality or a principal authority shall undertake an implementing action, the municipality and the principal authority shall complete and submit to the Source Protection Authority, the monitoring report in a form to be established (this includes reporting from Risk Management Officials).
content goes here