SWP - Policy Interface
Home
Policies
Full Text Policies
Reports/Stats
Home
Policy Edit
Previous Policy
Policy
Next Policy
Policy Id:
SPR/SPA:
Risk:
SAL-7
Central Lake Ontario, Credit Valley, Toronto
Significant
Implementing Body
Legal Effect
Policy Tool
Threat Type
Status
Comment
Amaranth Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
Implemented
Durham, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
No response required/not applicable
No handling of road salts threats.
East Garafraxa Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
Implemented
Erin Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
No response required/not applicable
This policy does not currently apply.
Halton, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
Implemented
Mono Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
Implemented
Orangeville Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
Implemented
Peel, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
Implemented
York, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future & Existing
Implemented
Amaranth Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Durham, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
No response required/not applicable
No handling of road salts threats.
East Garafraxa Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Erin Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
No response required/not applicable
This policy does not currently apply.
Halton, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
In progress/some progress made
Mono Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented: Policy outcome(s) evaluated - No further action(s) required
previously stated there may be one SDWT. I have reviewed, I don't know the property referred to, but will look into more.
Orangeville Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Peel, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
York, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Amaranth Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Durham, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
No response required/not applicable
No handling of road salts threats.
East Garafraxa Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Erin Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
No response required/not applicable
This policy does not currently apply.
Halton, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Mono Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Orangeville Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
No response required/not applicable
Policy SAL-7 does not identify scenarios where the future handling and storage of road salt would require an RMP.
Peel, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
York, Regional Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Policy Text:
Where the handling and storage of road salt is, or would be, a significant drinking water threat (excluding incidental quantities for personal use), the following actions shall be taken:
1) The handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act, and is therefore prohibited where the threat would be significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (future); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (future); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (future); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (future).
2) The handling and storage of road salt is designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans where the threat is significant in any of the following areas:
WHPA-A (existing); or
WHPA-B (VS = 10) (existing); or
WHPA-E (VS = 9) (existing); or
the remainder of an Issue Contributing Area for Sodium or Chloride (existing).
Timelines:
T-5: Activities (future) designated for the purpose of s.57 under the Clean Water Act are prohibited immediately upon the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
T-6: Activities (existing) designated for the purpose of s.58 under the Clean Water Act, requiring risk management plans shall be identified and confirmed within 1 year by the Risk Management Official. Risk management plans shall be established within 5 years from the date the Source Protection Plan takes effect.
Monitoring Text:
MON-2: The Risk Management Official shall, by February 1 of each year, undertake the reporting requirements specified in s. 65 of O. Reg. 287/07 under the Clean Water Act, 2006 on the actions taken in the previous calendar year to achieve the outcomes of the source protection policy. Reporting shall include information related to the effectiveness of the policies in ensuring a threat ceases to be, or does not become significant, and any actions required to respond to a drinking water threat during the reporting period.
content goes here