SWP - Policy Interface
Home
Policies
Full Text Policies
Reports/Stats
Home
Policy Edit
Previous Policy
Policy
Next Policy
Policy Id:
SPR/SPA:
Risk:
1.07
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River
Significant
Implementing Body
Legal Effect
Policy Tool
Threat Type
Status
Comment
Chatham-Kent Municipality of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
In progress/some progress made
Very few development application within these areas
Essex, County of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
As new local Official Plans are submitted to the County for final approval we confirm with ERCA that appropriate policies are contained and mapping relating to Section 59, Restricted Land Uses of the Clean Water Act.
Lakeshore Town of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
Lambton, County of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
This is required to be addressed by the County's local municipal partners and their respective RMO.
Lambton Shores Municipality of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
No response required/not applicable
No such applications have been submitted in applicable areas.
Leamington Municipality of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
Implementing the written direction and including RMO on application reviews.
Middlesex Centre Municipality of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
In progress/some progress made
opa approved but under appeal. zba awaits final approval of opa
Perth East Township of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
Perth South Township of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
Planning and Building department staff, get approval from RMO for any applications within significant threat areas
Plympton-Wyoming Town of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
For Agricultural, Commerical and Industrial land uses.
Point Edward Village of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
Sarnia City of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
St. Clair Township of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
St. Marys Town of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
Stratford City of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
In progress/some progress made
In OP, Zoning By-Law adopted in 2021.
Thames Centre Municipality of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
West Perth Municipality of - (Municipality)
Conform with
Section 59 Restricted Land Uses
Future & Existing
Implemented
Policy Text:
In areas where Sections 57 or 58 of the Clean Water Act applies, all land uses identified within the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-laws, with the exception of residential uses, are hereby designated for the purposes of Section 59 (Restricted Land Uses). Activities identified as significant drinking water threats through event-based modelling are exempted from this policy (as they are covered by policy 1.08).
Within these designated land use categories and areas, a notice from the Risk Management Official in accordance with Section 59(2) of the Clean Water Act shall be required prior to approval of any Planning Act or Building Permit application.
Despite the above policy, a Risk Management Official may issue written direction specifying the situations under which a planning authority or building official may be permitted to make the determination that a site-specific land use is not designated for the purposes of Section 59. Where such direction has been issued, a site-specific land use that is the subject of an application for approval under the Planning Act or for a permit under the Building Code Act is not designated for the purposes of Section 59, provided that the planning authority or building official, as the case may be, is satisfied that:
* The application complies with the written direction from the Risk Management Official; and
* The applicant has demonstrated that a significant drinking water threat activity designated for the purposes of Section 57 or 58 will not be engaged in, or will not be affected by the application.
Monitoring Text:
5.08: Municipalities, and all other implementers, shall establish monitoring
programs as per Section 45 of the Clean Water Act. The information
collected through these monitoring programs shall be included in a
monitoring report that shall be submitted annually to the Upper Thames
River Conservation Authority. The information submitted to the
Conservation Authority shall be consistent with the guidance developed
pursuant to policy 5.02 where that guidance identifies items required to
meet provincial reporting requirements of the implementer or SPA.
Aspects of the guidance which are beyond that which is necessary to
satisfy provincial reporting requirements shall be considered in submitting
the monitoring reports. Monitoring reports are to be submitted by February
1 of each year following the first anniversary of the effective date of the
Source Protection Plan. Monitoring reports shall include information since
the submission of the previous monitoring report to December 31 of the
year previous to the deadline for report submission. For the first report, the
information shall include information from the effective date of the Source
Protection Plan.
content goes here