SWP - Policy Interface
Home
Policies
Full Text Policies
Reports/Stats
Home
Policy Edit
Previous Policy
Policy
Next Policy
Policy Id:
SPR/SPA:
Risk:
3.01
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River
Low, Moderate
Implementing Body
Legal Effect
Policy Tool
Threat Type
Status
Comment
Chatham-Kent Municipality of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
In progress/some progress made
Lakeshore Town of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
No progress made
Lambton, County of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
No response required/not applicable
Lambton Shores Municipality of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
In progress/some progress made
Properties are reviewed when planning act applications are submitted or building permits trigger review.
Middlesex Centre Municipality of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
Implemented
done
Perth, County of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
In progress/some progress made
Every Planning Application is reviewed for septic system location and proximity to WHPA so that any necessary risk assessment can be undertaken. We obtained some Hydrogeological training from Geoff Reuther. Planners were able to ask questions and relay some real world examples.
Perth South Township of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
No response required/not applicable
considered but no plan to implement
Sarnia City of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
In progress/some progress made
Review of those locations where residential septics may be within city boundaries. Very limited number where monitoring or a requirement to hook up my be required based on assessment results. All new development will require sewer connections as per policies.
St. Clair Township of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
No response required/not applicable
St. Marys Town of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
Implemented
Stratford City of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
In progress/some progress made
Thames Centre Municipality of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
No progress made
Due to staff turnover, we have not been able to implement a septic system maintenance inspection program.
West Perth Municipality of - (Municipality)
Strategic
Specify Actions to be taken to implement plan or achieve its objectives
Existing
No progress made
Policy Text:
To reduce the risk to drinking water sources from septic systems or septic system holding tanks in vulnerable areas where this activity is a low or moderate threat, the local approval agency of septic systems, under the authority of the Ontario Building Code (municipalities or the Board of Health), should consider including these septic systems as part of the discretionary maintenance inspection program outlined in O. Reg. 315/10. In considering these discretionary inspections, priority should be given to areas where septic systems are known to fail and where older septic systems are predominant. Further, special consideration should also be given to maintenance inspection of septic systems which are moderate or low drinking water threats in vulnerable areas where nitrate or phosphorous discharged from septic systems may contribute to identified issues.
Monitoring Text:
5.08: Municipalities, and all other implementers, shall establish monitoring
programs as per Section 45 of the Clean Water Act. The information
collected through these monitoring programs shall be included in a
monitoring report that shall be submitted annually to the Upper Thames
River Conservation Authority. The information submitted to the
Conservation Authority shall be consistent with the guidance developed
pursuant to policy 5.02 where that guidance identifies items required to
meet provincial reporting requirements of the implementer or SPA.
Aspects of the guidance which are beyond that which is necessary to
satisfy provincial reporting requirements shall be considered in submitting
the monitoring reports. Monitoring reports are to be submitted by February
1 of each year following the first anniversary of the effective date of the
Source Protection Plan. Monitoring reports shall include information since
the submission of the previous monitoring report to December 31 of the
year previous to the deadline for report submission. For the first report, the
information shall include information from the effective date of the Source
Protection Plan.
content goes here