SWP - Policy Interface
Home
Policies
Full Text Policies
Reports/Stats
Home
Policy Edit
Previous Policy
Policy
Next Policy
Policy Id:
SPR/SPA:
Risk:
2.21
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River
Significant
Implementing Body
Legal Effect
Policy Tool
Threat Type
Status
Comment
OMAFRA - NMS
Conform with
Prescribed Instruments
Existing
No response required/not applicable
NOTE: OMAFRA does not issue or review Nutrient Management Plans so answer will always be not applicable. However, guidance has been developed for Risk Management Officials, farmers and certified individuals that prepare Nutrient Management Plans to use to help determine if a prescribed instrument conforms to the significant drinking water threat policies. Guidance documents are available on nutrientmanagement.ca under the Resources section. Some training was also delivered by OMAFRA to certified preparers on requirements and responsibilities of incorporating source water protection into prescribed instruments (Nutrient Management Plans included).
OMAFRA - NMS
Conform with
Prescribed Instruments
Future
No response required/not applicable
NOTE: OMAFRA does not issue or review Nutrient Management Plans so answer will always be not applicable. However, guidance has been developed for Risk Management Officials, farmers and certified individuals that prepare Nutrient Management Plans to use to help determine if a prescribed instrument conforms to the significant drinking water threat policies. Guidance documents are available on nutrientmanagement.ca under the Resources section. Some training was also delivered by OMAFRA to certified preparers on requirements and responsibilities of incorporating source water protection into prescribed instruments (Nutrient Management Plans included).
Chatham-Kent Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Middlesex Centre Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
No progress made
not formally discussed with farmer
Perth East Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Perth South Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Point Edward Village of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Sarnia City of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
New Services Contract in place with UTRCA
St. Marys Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Stratford City of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Thames Centre Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
In progress/some progress made
We were able to enter into a RMP with all but one property owner/user who didn't respond to contact attempts.
West Perth Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Existing
Implemented
Chatham-Kent Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Middlesex Centre Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
No progress made
not formally discussed with farmer
Perth East Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Perth South Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Point Edward Village of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Sarnia City of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
New Services Contract in place with UTRCA
St. Marys Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Stratford City of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Thames Centre Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
ASM storage facilities require building permits. Future drinking water threats to be identified and assessed through that process.
West Perth Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 58 Risk Management Plans
Future
Implemented
Policy Text:
To reduce the risk to municipal drinking water sources from the application of agricultural source material (ASM), this activity shall be managed where it is or would be a significant drinking water threat.
This activity shall be designated for the purposes of Section 58 of the Clean Water Act and a Risk Management Plan shall be required. Nutrient Management Act principles (including NMA prohibitions) shall form the basis of the Risk Management Plan provided the Risk Management Official is satisfied these principles adequately manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat.
Any Prescribed Instrument related to the Application of ASM that is created, amended, or used as part of a notice for the purpose of a Section 61 exemption, shall manage the activity so that it ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking water threat. OMAFRA is expected to review all Prescribed Instruments issued under the Nutrient Management Act in areas where the activities they regulate are, or would be, significant drinking water threats to ensure the Prescribed Instruments contain such terms and conditions. This review is expected to include Prescribed Instruments that are not directly created or issued by OMAFRA, such as Nutrient Management Plans.
Further, OMAFRA and other Prescribed Instrument creators/issuers are expected to consult with the Risk Management Official with respect to any modifications or requirements that may need to be incorporated into the Prescribed Instruments under the Nutrient Management Act to ensure the activities they regulate cease to be or never become significant drinking water threats. However, nothing in this policy grants the Risk Management Official authority to specify requirements for a prescribed instrument issued under the Nutrient Management Act, or where a person is seeking an exemption from a risk management plan under section 61 of O.Reg 287/07.
Monitoring Text:
(5.03) Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs and all other implementers, shall establish monitoring programs as per Section 45 of the Clean Water Act. The information collected through these monitoring programs shall be included in a monitoring report that shall be submitted annually to the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority. The information submitted to the Conservation Authority shall be consistent with the guidance developed pursuant to policy 5.02. Monitoring reports are to be submitted by February 1 of each year following the first anniversary of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. Monitoring reports shall include information since the submission of the previous monitoring report to December 31 of the year previous to the deadline for report submission. For the first report, the information shall include information from the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
5.10: The Risk Management Official shall provide a report to the Source Protection Authority, by February 1 of each year, summarizing the actions
taken by the Risk Management Official and the Risk Management Inspector(s). The information that shall be contained in this report is
outlined within Sec. 65 (1) of O. Reg. 287/07.
content goes here