SWP - Policy Interface
Home
Policies
Full Text Policies
Reports/Stats
Home
Policy Edit
Previous Policy
Policy
Next Policy
Policy Id:
SPR/SPA:
Risk:
2.05
Lower Thames Valley, St. Clair Region, Upper Thames River
Significant
Implementing Body
Legal Effect
Policy Tool
Threat Type
Status
Comment
MECP – WDS – Hauled Sewage, Biosolids
Conform with
Prescribed Instruments
Future
Implemented
Since May 2015, the ministry screens all (including new and existing) hauled sewage, processed organic waste, and biosolids disposal site Environmental Compliance Approval applications in accordance with Source Water Protection Plans. This includes consideration of whether the proposed activity would be a drinking water threat as outlined in the relevant Source Water Protection Plan under the Clean Water Act. The ministry will not issue an Environmental Compliance Approval for a site deemed as a significant drinking water threat. For sites deemed as a low or moderate drinking water threat, the ministry will consider the application, but additional site restrictions may apply. The ministry’s review and approval process is included in the Standard Operating Procedure that can be found in Environmental Registry No. 012-2968 (https://ero.ontario.ca/archive/012-2968).
MECP - WDS - Landfilling and Storage
Conform with
Prescribed Instruments
Future
Implemented
As legally required, where a source protection policy that relies on a prescribed instrument (PI) to prohibit an activity that is a significant drinking water threat, the Ministry conforms to the policy by refusing to issue an instrument for the activity.
Chatham-Kent Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future
Implemented
Middlesex Centre Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future
No response required/not applicable
doesn't apply
Perth East Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future
Implemented
Perth South Township of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future
Implemented
St. Marys Town of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future
Implemented
Stratford City of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future
Implemented
Thames Centre Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future
No response required/not applicable
West Perth Municipality of - (RMO)
Conform with
Section 57 Prohibition
Future
Implemented
Policy Text:
With the exception of the following waste disposal site threat subcategories:
storage of wastes described in clauses (p), (q), (r), (s), (t), or (u) of the definition of hazardous waste, or in clause (d) of the definition of liquid industrial waste; or
storage of hazardous or liquid industrial waste,
where this activity would be a significant drinking water threat future waste disposal sites shall be designated for the purposes of Section 57 of the Clean Water Act so that so that the activity ceases to be or never becomes a significant drinking
Where this activity is subject to Environmental Compliance Approvals (ECAs), the Province (Ministry of Environment (MOE)) shall prohibit this activity through the ECAs.
Monitoring Text:
(5.04): Ministry of Environment, and all other implementers, shall establish monitoring programs as per Section 45 of the Clean Water Act. The information collected through these monitoring programs shall be included in a monitoring report that shall be submitted annually to the Upper Thames River Conservation Authority. The information submitted to the Conservation Authority shall be consistent with the guidance developed pursuant to policy 5.02 where that guidance identifies items required to meet provincial reporting requirements of the implementer or SPA. Aspects of the guidance which are beyond that which is necessary to satisfy provincial reporting requirements shall be considered in submitting the monitoring reports. Monitoring reports are to be submitted by February 1 of each year following the first anniversary of the effective date of the Source Protection Plan. Monitoring reports shall include information since the submission of the previous monitoring report to December 31 of the year previous to the deadline for report submission. For the first report, the information shall include information from the effective date of the Source Protection Plan.
5.10: The Risk Management Official shall provide a report to the Source Protection Authority, by February 1 of each year, summarizing the actions
taken by the Risk Management Official and the Risk Management Inspector(s). The information that shall be contained in this report is outlined within Sec. 65 (1) of O. Reg. 287/07.
content goes here